I object to Muslims within Australian showing no regard for our natural law,
common law and constitutional human rights--'THE RIGHT OF HUMANITY IN THEIR
OWN PERSON', engaging in unrestrained procreation.
PAPAL & NAZI GERMAN REICH'S 1933 CONCORDANT CLAIM TO NATURAL LAW
That there is implied within Jesus' [Matthew 18:34-35; 19:1-12] discourse on
'marriage', a Natural Law jurisprudent consideration upon whether the
essential root of our Being as Human Nature, has its beginning-ARCHE as
participation within the Divine Nature, a chronological hyponomic view of
the hypostasis:
Given Telos ('achariyth) = Arch (re'shiyth) + c©÷ such that:
22/7 as 3W1D ...
[7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092
days x 2 = 2184 days
x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756]
.... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9©÷+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41 centric on 13-17
September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762
As something altogether different to the Animal Nature--we exist to find a
mate and breed: "Natural sexual union takes place either in accordance with
mere animal nature (vaga libido, venus volgivaga, fornicatio) or in
accordance with law. Sexual union in accordance with law is marriage
(matrimonium), that is, the union of two persons of different sexes for
lifelong possession of each other's sexual attributes. The end of begetting
and bringing up children may be an end of nature, for which it implanted the
inclinations of the sexes for each other; but it is not requisite for human
beings who marry to make this their end in order for their union to be
compatible with rights [as in the circumstance of same-gender bonding
aspiratiions 'Lawful Sexual Activity'], for otherwise marriage would be
dissolved when procreation ceases." ([Kant 1724-1804, The Doctrine of Right,
The Metaphysics of Morals, para 25])
Given the neural linguistic connection (only 22 elements) how did a human
brain end up in an animal body? Isn't the regard for the Seventh-day Sabbath
also a consideration of Natural Law? If so, how then can the Papal Holy See
claim in its representations and protests to the governing authorities in
Germany, of the clear and energetic language as a mutual duty to respect and
fulfill the obligations of the natural law itself that were confirmed by the
Concordat?
Given the 'Male-Female-Number' paradigm as the 'order of male and female'
historically espoused by philosophy of religion is only drawn from symbolic
theology, there is expressed within the immediate context of Adolf Hitler's
four Nuremberg Laws introduced from 15 September 1935 as a Categorical
Imperative, an unnecessary repetition in the expression of an idea,
especially in the words 'marry/sexual intercourse' which fails to impart any
additional force or clearness as the basis for Natural Law's rule of
conduct:
Marriages between Jews and citizens of German or kindred blood are
forbidden. Marriages concluded in defiance of this law are void, even if,
for the purpose of evading this law, they were concluded abroad. Proceedings
for annulment may be initiated only by the Public Prosecutor.
Sexual relations outside marriage between Jews and nationals of German or
kindred blood are forbidden.
Jews will not be permitted to employ female citizens of German or kindred
blood as domestic servants.
Jews are forbidden to display the Reich and national flag or the national
colors.
Because human actions, which are the subject of laws, are individual and
innumerable, it is not possible to establish any law that may not sometimes
work out unjustly. Legislators, however, in passing laws, attend to what
commonly happens, though to apply the common rule will sometimes work
injustice and defeat the intention of the law itself. In such cases it is
bad to follow the law; it is good to set aside its letter and follow the
dictates of justice and the common good. Logically, chronologically, and
ontologically antecedent to all human society for which it provides the
indispensable basis, the natural or moral law is neither¡©as Hobbes, in
anticipation of the modern positivistic school, taught¡©a product of social
agreement or convention, nor a mere congeries of the actions, customs, and
ways of man, as claimed by the ethicists who, refusing to acknowledge the
First Cause as a Personality with whom one entertains personal relations,
deprive the law of its obligatory basis. It is a true law, for through it
the Divine Mind imposes on the subject minds of His rational creatures their
obligations and prescribes their duties. [Our Knowledge of the Natural Law,
New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia]
The obvious consideration is, whether after purging the party of its
'detrimental acts' in 30 June 1934, the German Reich could in reality be a
'legally constituted Government' under the terms of the Concordat Between
the Holy See & the German Reich on 20 July 1933--We also see here, that the
Roman Catholic Church and presumably other religious communities of faith
attitudes towards homosexuality as 'detrimental to family life' is identical
to the claim to piety as ecclesiastical oath prescribed within the Concordat
betweeen the Papal Authority and the German Reich. And may indeed be viewed
as a continuum of inter-related events. In that the Nazi party also
denounced homosexuality as not only detrimental to natural population
growth, but harmful to the nation's strength and family life. [Ref: ? 1997,
The Simon Wiesenthal Center]
There was also the "State's interest" associated to Natural Law and to which
the ecclesiastical authorities were required to swear allegiance: "Before
God and on the Holy Gospels I swear and promise as becomes a bishop, loyalty
to the German Reich and to the State of . . . I swear and promise to honor
the legally constituted Government and to cause the clergy of my diocese to
honor it. In the performance of my spiritual office and in my solicitude for
the welfare and the interests of the German Reich, I will endeavor to avoid
all detrimental acts which might endanger it." [Article 16 proscribing an
ecclesiastical oath -- Concordat Between the Holy See & the German Reich 20
July 1933].
The relationship between the Papal Holy See and the German Reich established
on Principles of Natural Law--was described as an intellectual battle
against the legitimacy of the Roman Catholic Church on these principles of
Natural Law:
"A war which has raged terribly and horribly, like none other in past epochs
of the history of humanity is at an end. ...At an end also is an
intellectual battle, the goal of which was the destruction of Christianity
and Church among our people; a campaign of lies and treachery against truth
and love, against divine and human rights, and against international law."
[A pastoral letter of the Archbishops and Bishops of Austria after
liberation, dated 17 October 1945]
"The struggle against the Church did, in fact, become ever more bitter;
there was the dissolution of Catholic organizations; the gradual suppression
of the flourishing Catholic schools, both public and private; the enforced
weaning of youth from family and Church; the pressure brought to bear on the
conscience of citizens, and especially of civil servants; the systematic
defamation, by means of a clever, closely- organized propaganda, of the
Church, the clergy, the faithful, the Church's institutions, teachings, and
history; the closing, dissolution, confiscation of religious houses and
other ecclesiastical institutions; the complete suppression of the Catholic
press and publishing houses ...
In the meantime the Holy See itself multiplied its representations and
protests to governing authorities in Germany, reminding them, in clear and
energetic language, of their duty to respect and fulfill the obligations of
the natural law itself that were confirmed by the Concordat. In these
critical years, joining the alert vigilance of a pastor to the
long-suffering patience of a father, our great predecessor, Pius XII,
fulfilled his mission as Supreme Pontiff with intrepid courage."
[International Military Tribunal "Blue Series," Vol. 4, p. 64,
http://www.holocaust-history.org/works/imt/04/htm/t064.htm ]
At issue then, is the ethical nature of public portrayals as to what
constitutes a valid, ethical and true Christian Identity and whether Article
16 proscribing an ecclesiastical oath within the Concordat Between the Papal
Holy See & the German Reich 20 July 1933, is an attempt to represent either
of them as being consistent with the ¡°Priest¡¯s Office Before God¡± or
¡°Officials of the Sanctuary and Officials of the House of God¡±.
--
- dolf
- <http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com>
.
|
