| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Robert B. Winn" |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2004 08:43:01 AM |
| Object: |
: Choice and Homosexuality |
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2v2r9aF2e7is5U5@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2uu6v2F2f3pt2U3@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2urvc8F2e8rr4U6@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2uofssF2c1sfdU1@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ulb36F2a3848U1@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ujs9eF2a6mqiU8@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ugkokF29fck3U13@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2u3ursF24v1a2U8@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote in message news:<61cfn0th3elniet2lu2eqkau7cb5afqflf@4ax.com>...
On 20 Oct 2004 15:00:10 -0700, (Robert B. Winn)
wrote:
Well, I used a definition given by Jesus Christ 2000 years ago. How
do you get that it is a new definition?
Robert B. winn
God defines a Bat as a Bird. It seems God got a few things wrong
what's your point?
James, Seattle
Well, I don't think so.
Robert B. Winn
OK, so how is a bat a bird?
Bats and various kinds of birds and shellfish were on a list of
creatures listed by Moses as being unclean. How are bats and birds
shellfish?
Robert B. Winn
The Bible never said shellfish are birds. It DOES say that bats are
birds. Nice attempt at a dodge. So how are bats birds?
You might want to ask someone in the field of biology. I do not
really care how they are birds.
Robert B. Winn
They aren't.
Well, if you want to eat them, go ahead. The law of Moses was
fulfilled when Christ was born.
Robert B. winn
I don't want to eat them. I want you to explain why God said bats are
birds when he supposedly knew better.
Well, my guess is that the verse was mis-translated.
Kinda like "with child"??
When Moses said
flying creatures, it was translated fowls.
Robert B. Winn
How was with child mistranslated? With child means the same thing as pregnant.
Robert B. Winn
The word "child" did not appear in the original writing. Inserting it is
a mistranslation.
Well, of course, you are welcome to your own opinion. I think it was
translated exactly right.
That's an opinion, and an uneducated one at that, not a fact.
Perhaps after the resurrection we can get
Luke's opinion about the translation.
'Fraid not.
He's staying dead.
Robert B. winn
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
17 Nov 2004 03:57:16 PM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I guess you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
17 Nov 2004 04:38:26 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
18 Nov 2004 06:59:55 AM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cngjrj$suj$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
18 Nov 2004 10:15:02 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411180459.6a34c8fb@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cngjrj$suj$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote
in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt
to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted
of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this
one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it
is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles
who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought
you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more
from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling
your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should
actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry.
I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in
the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right
answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly
owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I
am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I
guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Irrelevant. You cannot be frozen and remain viable life. You are
different.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
19 Nov 2004 04:55:20 AM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cnihot$c6s$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411180459.6a34c8fb@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cngjrj$suj$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote
in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt
to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted
of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this
one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it
is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles
who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought
you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more
from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling
your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should
actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry.
I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in
the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right
answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly
owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I
am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I
guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Irrelevant. You cannot be frozen and remain viable life. You are
different.
So what are you saying, a two-celled human is more alive than I am?
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
19 Nov 2004 08:25:28 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411190255.1a314417@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnihot$c6s$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411180459.6a34c8fb@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cngjrj$suj$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu>
wrote
in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com>
wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak
mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to
attempt
to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the
child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and
convicted
of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this
one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way
it
is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post
I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many
pedophiles
who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what
pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I
thought
you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected
more
from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone
calling
your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should
actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your
post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be
sorry.
I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you
read in
the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right
answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you
certainly
owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults,
so I
am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should
be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones
being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like
a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human.
I
guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come
out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Irrelevant. You cannot be frozen and remain viable life. You are
different.
So what are you saying, a two-celled human is more alive than I am?
I'm answering your question, what makes you different from a 2 celled human.
Any value judgement you are making from that is your own judgement, not
mine.
I think you are far more valuable than any 2 celled human.
That's just my opinion, though, and perhaps some people think differently.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
20 Nov 2004 12:30:47 AM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cnkvlk$od5$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411190255.1a314417@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnihot$c6s$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411180459.6a34c8fb@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cngjrj$suj$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411171357.29ef4fd1@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnes1d$aa6$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu>
wrote
in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com>
wrote in
message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak
mind to
make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to
attempt
to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the
child
tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and
convicted
of
the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this
one.
This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way
it
is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post
I've
read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many
pedophiles
who
would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what
pedophiles
would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I
thought
you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected
more
from
you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone
calling
your
post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should
actually
agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your
post
wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be
sorry.
I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you
read in
the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right
answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you
certainly
owe
me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults,
so I
am
not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should
be,
however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones
being
killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like
a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human.
I
guess
you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are
forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come
out.
Well, I have at least two cells. What is the difference you find
between the two-celled human and me?
You cannot be frozen and survive.
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Irrelevant. You cannot be frozen and remain viable life. You are
different.
So what are you saying, a two-celled human is more alive than I am?
I'm answering your question, what makes you different from a 2 celled human.
Any value judgement you are making from that is your own judgement, not
mine.
I think you are far more valuable than any 2 celled human.
That's just my opinion, though, and perhaps some people think differently.
Why would I be more valuable than a two celled human? You are the
first person to ever make that assessment.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
20 Nov 2004 08:42:47 AM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cnkvlk$od5$1@news.netins.net>...
X
I do not intend to be frozen. That is why I moved to Arizona.
Irrelevant. You cannot be frozen and remain viable life. You are
different.
So what are you saying, a two-celled human is more alive than I am?
I'm answering your question, what makes you different from a 2 celled human.
Any value judgement you are making from that is your own judgement, not
mine.
I think you are far more valuable than any 2 celled human.
That's just my opinion, though, and perhaps some people think differently.
So what are you saying about the two-celled human? If you can say,
This two-celled human does not deserve to live, and then you help kill
it, you have proven to yourself that you are more intelligent than the
two-celled human. I have noticed the same attitude in people who
steal. If they can steal something from another person, they feel
more intelligent than that person.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:20:54 PM |
|
|
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
So, let's see if you accept me as I am or if you try to change me.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 11:28:01 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
So, let's see if you accept me as I am or if you try to change me.
Robert B. Winn
You're wearing diapers?
Jack
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
04 Jan 2005 06:28:08 AM |
|
|
nJb <NoNHL@all.com> writes:
rbwinn3@juno.com wrote:
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
So, let's see if you accept me as I am or if you try to change me.
Robert B. Winn
You're wearing diapers?
He's matured *that* much?
(I can see where you get your username from...with the Gwizzlies in town, you
don't have the AHL either, this season. :-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Norfolk 1 (December 31)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, January 8 at Milwaukee, 1:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
04 Jan 2005 01:42:04 PM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey wrote:
nJb <NoNHL@all.com> writes:
rbwinn3@juno.com wrote:
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
So, let's see if you accept me as I am or if you try to change me.
Robert B. Winn
You're wearing diapers?
He's matured *that* much?
(I can see where you get your username from...with the Gwizzlies in town, you
don't have the AHL either, this season. :-)
Caught a game when the Griffins were in town. Even though the Grizz won
it was rather drab. A year ago last night I was at Joe Louis Arena
watching the Wings push the Ducks around. How things change.
Jack
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
04 Jan 2005 05:06:21 AM |
|
|
nJb wrote:
rbwinn3@juno.com wrote:
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
So, let's see if you accept me as I am or if you try to change me.
Robert B. Winn
You're wearing diapers?
Jack
LOL!!!!!
--
--sexkitten--
In Loving Memory of Jim Addison
9/18/71 - 12/30/04
Seeing you lie there,
no movement, no life, no soul
broke my heart and
pushed me to the ground.
I began to cry and reached for love
but the one i loved had gone away
leaving me alone
to face the ever trying day
My head knew you were gone for ever,
but my heart held onto the hope you were just sleeping
for the all moments I saw you alive,
was a treasured moment worth keeping.
Now I need to let go for good,
but it is the hardest thing to do,
to let something go you love,
to have nothing there and nothing to do.
I had never loved something so dear
and for days i let my tears flow
until the realization hit me,
I had to let you go.
- Jessica Millar
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:23:21 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Well, you are the one in favor
When you say "you" to whom are you referring?
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 06:18:29 PM |
|
|
On 3 Jan 2005 15:20:54 -0800, said in alt.atheism:
Well, you are the one in favor of pedophelia. I am not in favor of
pedophelia.
No, you're in favor of stupidity.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:15:26 PM |
|
|
By their actions. Their actions agree with your ideas.
Robert b. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 11:26:03 PM |
|
|
wrote:
By their actions. Their actions agree with your ideas.
Robert b. winn
Who the ***** are you talking to? Yourself?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:19:10 PM |
|
|
wrote:
By their actions. Their actions agree with your ideas.
Robert b. winn
When you say "their" and "your" to whom are you referring?
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:12:14 PM |
|
|
Well, I am sure you would like to see the police enforce homosexual
acts with children, but they are not that corrupted yet. Give them a
few more years.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:17:21 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Well, I am sure you would like to see
When you say "you" to whom are you referring? You should leave the message
header intact so that people will know to what, and who you are responding.
Why are you chisters always so stupid?
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kermit" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
19 Nov 2004 06:22:48 PM |
|
|
(Robert B. Winn) wrote in message news:<a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com>...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf73d8da6c76ed2989a88@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411061809.2424fbd7@posting.google.com>,
says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf69a761c33fd9e989a84@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411060643.38c1fc71@posting.google.com>,
says...
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer. Parents tell their kids
that santa is real also, but you need to grow out of that and you need
to grow out of your jesus fixation too.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
Well, no one can take away any choice to commit sin.
Sure they can, fool. All they have to do is to make it impossible to
perform certain acts. A choice is not solely a mental selection, but an
action or series of actions going along with it. If some of those
actions are no longer possible then those choices are closed off as
well. One might wish one could do certain things, but that is not the
same thing as being able to choose to do them.
However, suppose
someone chooses to commit the sin of murder.
OKay, I'll suppose that.
Even though they have
made the choice, they are often prevented from committing the actual
sin.
That's because the action very clearly causes harm and loss of rights to
others. As John Stuart Mill argued in _On Liberty_, the only
justification for depriving a person of his liberty should be when his
or her actions might reasonable endanger the rights of others. While
murder clearly does injure the rights of others, it is not clear that
homosexual acts do, at least in general.
By the same token, homosexuals are often prevented from
perpetrating their sin.
But you haven't shown that there is any legitimate justification for
this. You've simply admitted that homosexuals are deprived of
exercising freedoms that you've chosen to label "sins" according to your
ridiculous religious world views.
That is just the way it is.
'Fraid not, *****. Fortunately there is a constitution and a bill of
rights that protects us from assholes like you, who attempt to take away
the rights of others and say, "that is just the way it is" (like you're
some demented bruce hornsby impersonator or something).
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
So if a heterosexual priest or backwoods preacher wanted to have sex
with a twelve year-old girl, that would be OK with you?
What does statutory rape or child molesting have to do with
homosexuality?
Kermit
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Hawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
08 Nov 2004 11:15:43 AM |
|
|
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
09 Nov 2004 01:02:30 PM |
|
|
Charles Hawkins <chawkin2@NOSPAMwam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:<cmo9k1$pg$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
Out of interest, do you disapprove of any human activity that does not
directly violate anybody else's specific rights? Do you admit of any
such activity that is not 'good' for society in general?
Regards... Zinnic
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
09 Nov 2004 11:44:53 PM |
|
|
(Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411091102.60df3d75@posting.google.com>...
Charles Hawkins <chawkin2@NOSPAMwam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:<cmo9k1$pg$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
Out of interest, do you disapprove of any human activity that does not
directly violate anybody else's specific rights? Do you admit of any
such activity that is not 'good' for society in general?
Regards... Zinnic
I disapprove of abortions. Abortions directly violate the rights of
unborn children. I try to admit of activities that are "good" for
society in general.
For instance, growing food, building houses, etc.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zinnic" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
10 Nov 2004 05:47:09 AM |
|
|
(Robert B. Winn) wrote in message news:<a17e5e0e.0411092144.634d4ee@posting.google.com>...
zeenric2@gate.net (Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411091102.60df3d75@posting.google.com>...
Charles Hawkins <chawkin2@NOSPAMwam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:<cmo9k1$pg$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
Out of interest, do you disapprove of any human activity that does not
directly violate anybody else's specific rights? Do you admit of any
such activity that is not 'good' for society in general?
Regards... Zinnic
I disapprove of abortions. Abortions directly violate the rights of
unborn children. I try to admit of activities that are "good" for
society in general.
For instance, growing food, building houses, etc.
Robert B. Winn
I presume that you regard 'anybody' as inclusive of unborn children,
so your disapproval of abortion does not answer my question. Let me be
more specific.
Whose 'rights' are violated by activities such as polygamy,
prostitution, pornography, sexual activity or nakedness in public
places, depiction of violence, panhandling, student truancy,
foxhunting?
Do you approve of societal restriction of these activities?
Regards...Zinnic
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
10 Nov 2004 07:15:02 PM |
|
|
(Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411100347.7f82562e@posting.google.com>...
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message news:<a17e5e0e.0411092144.634d4ee@posting.google.com>...
(Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411091102.60df3d75@posting.google.com>...
Charles Hawkins <chawkin2@NOSPAMwam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:<cmo9k1$pg$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
Out of interest, do you disapprove of any human activity that does not
directly violate anybody else's specific rights? Do you admit of any
such activity that is not 'good' for society in general?
Regards... Zinnic
I disapprove of abortions. Abortions directly violate the rights of
unborn children. I try to admit of activities that are "good" for
society in general.
For instance, growing food, building houses, etc.
Robert B. Winn
I presume that you regard 'anybody' as inclusive of unborn children,
so your disapproval of abortion does not answer my question. Let me be
more specific.
Whose 'rights' are violated by activities such as polygamy,
prostitution, pornography, sexual activity or nakedness in public
places, depiction of violence, panhandling, student truancy,
foxhunting?
Do you approve of societal restriction of these activities?
Regards...Zinnic
Society has the right to restrict these activities. People who do not
like the society in which they live should consider moving to
different societies.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
10 Nov 2004 08:09:16 PM |
|
|
Robert B. Winn wrote:
zeenric2@gate.net (Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411100347.7f82562e@posting.google.com>...
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in message news:<a17e5e0e.0411092144.634d4ee@posting.google.com>...
zeenric2@gate.net (Zinnic) wrote in message news:<4ce617c0.0411091102.60df3d75@posting.google.com>...
Charles Hawkins <chawkin2@NOSPAMwam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:<cmo9k1$pg$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
It seems to me that this would be a case of society punishing someone
for participating in the crime of sexual contact with a child - that's
statutory rape. Society would also punish someone who did such a thing
with a child of the opposite sex. The crime here is not homosexuality.
It's sex with a minor, and nobody is arguing that this is acceptable.
Sexual contact between consenting adults is another matter. They are
not violating anybody else's rights.
Out of interest, do you disapprove | | | | | | |