| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Robert B. Winn" |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2004 08:43:01 AM |
| Object: |
: Choice and Homosexuality |
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2v2r9aF2e7is5U5@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2uu6v2F2f3pt2U3@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2urvc8F2e8rr4U6@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2uofssF2c1sfdU1@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ulb36F2a3848U1@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ujs9eF2a6mqiU8@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2ugkokF29fck3U13@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2u3ursF24v1a2U8@uni-berlin.de>...
Robert B. Winn wrote:
RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com> wrote in message news:<61cfn0th3elniet2lu2eqkau7cb5afqflf@4ax.com>...
On 20 Oct 2004 15:00:10 -0700, (Robert B. Winn)
wrote:
Well, I used a definition given by Jesus Christ 2000 years ago. How
do you get that it is a new definition?
Robert B. winn
God defines a Bat as a Bird. It seems God got a few things wrong
what's your point?
James, Seattle
Well, I don't think so.
Robert B. Winn
OK, so how is a bat a bird?
Bats and various kinds of birds and shellfish were on a list of
creatures listed by Moses as being unclean. How are bats and birds
shellfish?
Robert B. Winn
The Bible never said shellfish are birds. It DOES say that bats are
birds. Nice attempt at a dodge. So how are bats birds?
You might want to ask someone in the field of biology. I do not
really care how they are birds.
Robert B. Winn
They aren't.
Well, if you want to eat them, go ahead. The law of Moses was
fulfilled when Christ was born.
Robert B. winn
I don't want to eat them. I want you to explain why God said bats are
birds when he supposedly knew better.
Well, my guess is that the verse was mis-translated.
Kinda like "with child"??
When Moses said
flying creatures, it was translated fowls.
Robert B. Winn
How was with child mistranslated? With child means the same thing as pregnant.
Robert B. Winn
The word "child" did not appear in the original writing. Inserting it is
a mistranslation.
Well, of course, you are welcome to your own opinion. I think it was
translated exactly right.
That's an opinion, and an uneducated one at that, not a fact.
Perhaps after the resurrection we can get
Luke's opinion about the translation.
'Fraid not.
He's staying dead.
Robert B. winn
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 09:24:13 AM |
|
|
In article <a17e5e0e.0411060643.38c1fc71@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer. Parents tell their kids
that santa is real also, but you need to grow out of that and you need
to grow out of your jesus fixation too.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 12:50:47 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:24:13 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer.
Why is that, quib? Just because it's over your head doesn't mean we don't understand.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
The law of the land. You can be a queer if you want. Nobody's stopping you.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 08:43:47 PM |
|
|
In article <e57qo09c3lq8ngg1s575h039t5tsn2clr4@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:24:13 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer.
Why is that, quib? Just because it's over your head
You dumb sack of *****, flying reindeer are supposed to be over
everyone's head. But that fact that you're such a stupid ***** suggests
that theism is not at all due to intellect.
doesn't mean we don't understand.
You certainly don't understand, but more importantly, don't have the
intellectual capacity to understand. Your lifelong dishonesty has
completely atrophied your ability to think or analyze evidence.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
The law of the land.
Even the federal government, contrary to what Mr. Santorum might wish,
has not made homosexuality illegal. So it's not the law of the whole
land. There are specific states that try to regulate it. For that
matter there are theist mobs who try to take the law into their own
hands, as they did with people like Matthew Sheppard.
You can be a queer if you want.
I don't, but you quite obviously would like to be. I guess you're
afraid that your freddy kruger jesus would punish you.
As far as your claim, many right wing talibangelists and lawmakers are
absolutely trying everything they can to take away the rights of
homosexuals. States like texas, among others, have kept sodomy laws on
the books, specifically so that they can have a tool for imposing their
religious views upon others. So your claim rings rather hollow, as
usual.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 04:46:12 PM |
|
|
Many are called but few are chosen.
Robert b. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "rj" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:16:53 PM |
|
|
wrote in news:1104792372.733222.53550
@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Many are called but few are chosen.
Robert b. winn
Then why bother calling so many? Want a few, call a few.
r
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 04:56:48 PM |
|
|
On 3 Jan 2005 14:46:12 -0800, <> wrote:
Many are called but few are chosen.
Robert b. winn
Many are indoctrinated and taught not to think but
a few have enough braincells to overcome it.
You clearly are of the former catagory.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff North" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 04:00:22 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:50:47 -0600, in alt.politics.homosexuality duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
| On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:24:13 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
| >> Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
| >> Robert B. Winn
|
| >That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
| >sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer.
|
| Why is that, quib? Just because it's over your head doesn't mean we don't understand.
|
| >But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
| >discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
| >basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
|
| The law of the land. You can be a queer if you want. Nobody's stopping you.
Im know this isn't exactly what you are discussing but I couldn't
resist. Enjoy :-)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/11/04/tiger.bite.reut/index.html
'Come bite me!'
Lion complies with man's request
Friday, November 5, 2004 Posted: 5:32 AM EST (1032 GMT)
TAIPEI, Taiwan (Reuters) -- A man leaped into a lion's den at the
Taipei Zoo on Wednesday to try to convert the king of beasts to
Christianity, but was bitten in the leg for his efforts.
"Jesus will save you!" the 46-year-old man shouted at two African
lions lounging under a tree a few meters away.
"Come bite me!" he said with both hands raised, television footage
showed.
One of the lions, a large male with a shaggy mane, bit the man in his
right leg before zoo workers drove it off with water hoses and
tranquilizer guns.
Newspapers said that the lions had been fed earlier in the day,
otherwise the man might have been more seriously hurt ... or worse.
---------------------------------------------------------------
All I can say to the fundamentalist christians is:
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
jnorthau@yourpantsyahoo.com.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
07 Nov 2004 06:31:59 AM |
|
|
Jeff North <jnorth@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:<e7iqo0hoi0nd05cs3otc6foecktuub3sp7@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:50:47 -0600, in alt.politics.homosexuality duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
| On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:24:13 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
| >> Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
| >> Robert B. Winn
| >That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
| >sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer.
|
| Why is that, quib? Just because it's over your head doesn't mean we don't understand.
|
| >But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
| >discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
| >basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
|
| The law of the land. You can be a queer if you want. Nobody's stopping you.
Im know this isn't exactly what you are discussing but I couldn't
resist. Enjoy :-)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/11/04/tiger.bite.reut/index.html
'Come bite me!'
Lion complies with man's request
Friday, November 5, 2004 Posted: 5:32 AM EST (1032 GMT)
TAIPEI, Taiwan (Reuters) -- A man leaped into a lion's den at the
Taipei Zoo on Wednesday to try to convert the king of beasts to
Christianity, but was bitten in the leg for his efforts.
"Jesus will save you!" the 46-year-old man shouted at two African
lions lounging under a tree a few meters away.
"Come bite me!" he said with both hands raised, television footage
showed.
One of the lions, a large male with a shaggy mane, bit the man in his
right leg before zoo workers drove it off with water hoses and
tranquilizer guns.
Newspapers said that the lions had been fed earlier in the day,
otherwise the man might have been more seriously hurt ... or worse.
---------------------------------------------------------------
All I can say to the fundamentalist christians is:
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
BRING BACK THE LIONS BRING BACK THE LIONS
jnorthau@yourpantsyahoo.com.au : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Jeff.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
07 Nov 2004 09:35:25 AM |
|
|
(Robert B. Winn) writes:
Jeff North <jnorth@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:<e7iqo0hoi0nd05cs3otc6foecktuub3sp7@4ax.com>...
Im know this isn't exactly what you are discussing but I couldn't
resist. Enjoy :-)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/11/04/tiger.bite.reut/index.html
'Come bite me!' Lion complies with man's request Friday, November
5, 2004 Posted: 5:32 AM EST (1032 GMT)
TAIPEI, Taiwan (Reuters) -- A man leaped into a lion's den at the
Taipei Zoo on Wednesday to try to convert the king of beasts to
Christianity, but was bitten in the leg for his efforts.
"Jesus will save you!" the 46-year-old man shouted at two African
lions lounging under a tree a few meters away.
"Come bite me!" he said with both hands raised, television footage
showed.
One of the lions, a large male with a shaggy mane, bit the man in
his right leg before zoo workers drove it off with water hoses and
tranquilizer guns.
Newspapers said that the lions had been fed earlier in the day,
otherwise the man might have been more seriously hurt ... or
worse.
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Jeff.
Robert B. Winn
I should thank Jeff too. The story was hilarious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
07 Nov 2004 09:05:38 PM |
|
|
On 2004-11-08 02:35:25 +1100, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> said:
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) writes:
Jeff North <jnorth@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:<e7iqo0hoi0nd05cs3otc6foecktuub3sp7@4ax.com>...
Im know this isn't exactly what you are discussing but I couldn't
resist. Enjoy :-)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/11/04/tiger.bite.reut/index.html
'Come bite me!' Lion complies with man's request Friday, November
5, 2004 Posted: 5:32 AM EST (1032 GMT)
TAIPEI, Taiwan (Reuters) -- A man leaped into a lion's den at the
Taipei Zoo on Wednesday to try to convert the king of beasts to
Christianity, but was bitten in the leg for his efforts.
"Jesus will save you!" the 46-year-old man shouted at two African
lions lounging under a tree a few meters away.
"Come bite me!" he said with both hands raised, television footage
showed.
One of the lions, a large male with a shaggy mane, bit the man in
his right leg before zoo workers drove it off with water hoses and
tranquilizer guns.
Newspapers said that the lions had been fed earlier in the day,
otherwise the man might have been more seriously hurt ... or
worse.
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Jeff.
Robert B. Winn
I should thank Jeff too. The story was hilarious.
LOL, the story also shows how damaging that perverse Christian
lifestyle can be, with people throwing themselves into lion pits
because the "holy spirit told dem so".
Matty
--
"If a nation could not prosper without the enjoyment of perfect liberty
and perfect justice, there is not in the world a nation which could
ever have prospered." - The Wealth of Nations, Book IV, Chapter IX
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this
world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or
all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of
government except all those other forms that have been tried from time
to time." - Sir Winston Churchill, Hansard, November 11, 1947
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
07 Nov 2004 12:37:05 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:24:13 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer.
Why is that, quib? Just because it's over your head doesn't mean we
don't understand.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what
legal basis do others presume to take this choice away from an
individual?
The law of the land. You can be a queer if you want. Nobody's
stopping you.
That's the land Earl wants to live in. There are no federal laws that say
you can't be gay and even the law where he lives would have a hard time of
it.
(Louisiana still practices Napoleonic law rather than what the rest of the
USA does.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 08:09:28 PM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf69a761c33fd9e989a84@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411060643.38c1fc71@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer. Parents tell their kids
that santa is real also, but you need to grow out of that and you need
to grow out of your jesus fixation too.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
Well, no one can take away any choice to commit sin. However, suppose
someone chooses to commit the sin of murder. Even though they have
made the choice, they are often prevented from committing the actual
sin. By the same token, homosexuals are often prevented from
perpetrating their sin. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
06 Nov 2004 09:00:08 PM |
|
|
In article <a17e5e0e.0411061809.2424fbd7@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf69a761c33fd9e989a84@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411060643.38c1fc71@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer. Parents tell their kids
that santa is real also, but you need to grow out of that and you need
to grow out of your jesus fixation too.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
Well, no one can take away any choice to commit sin.
Sure they can, fool. All they have to do is to make it impossible to
perform certain acts. A choice is not solely a mental selection, but an
action or series of actions going along with it. If some of those
actions are no longer possible then those choices are closed off as
well. One might wish one could do certain things, but that is not the
same thing as being able to choose to do them.
However, suppose
someone chooses to commit the sin of murder.
OKay, I'll suppose that.
Even though they have
made the choice, they are often prevented from committing the actual
sin.
That's because the action very clearly causes harm and loss of rights to
others. As John Stuart Mill argued in _On Liberty_, the only
justification for depriving a person of his liberty should be when his
or her actions might reasonable endanger the rights of others. While
murder clearly does injure the rights of others, it is not clear that
homosexual acts do, at least in general.
By the same token, homosexuals are often prevented from
perpetrating their sin.
But you haven't shown that there is any legitimate justification for
this. You've simply admitted that homosexuals are deprived of
exercising freedoms that you've chosen to label "sins" according to your
ridiculous religious world views.
That is just the way it is.
'Fraid not, *****. Fortunately there is a constitution and a bill of
rights that protects us from assholes like you, who attempt to take away
the rights of others and say, "that is just the way it is" (like you're
some demented bruce hornsby impersonator or something).
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:01:33 PM |
|
|
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights do not do much these days. Right
to trial by jury began to be denied in the 1960's and is only granted
now in sensational cases that lawyers calculate will bring them more
business if publicized.
The ordinary citizen cannot get a trial by jury if charged with a crime
which is not one of these sensational cases.
That is just the way it is.
Remember, it was the choice of people like you to do away with
trial by jury, not mine.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 05:04:45 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights do not do much these days.
Blah, blah, blah....
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
03 Jan 2005 06:16:00 PM |
|
|
On 3 Jan 2005 15:01:33 -0800, said in alt.atheism:
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
And religiosity is the most profane thing that can come from the human
mouth.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
08 Nov 2004 08:09:45 AM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf73d8da6c76ed2989a88@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411061809.2424fbd7@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bf69a761c33fd9e989a84@news.individual.net>...
In article <a17e5e0e.0411060643.38c1fc71@posting.google.com>,
rbwinn3@juno.com says...
Well, let's just wait until Christ returns and see what he says then.
Robert B. Winn
Nothing, because he's still dead.
Resurrected. He arose from the tomb on the third day.
Robert B. Winn
That's just a ridiculous story, about as realistic as santa having a
sleigh of toys pulled by magic flying reindeer. Parents tell their kids
that santa is real also, but you need to grow out of that and you need
to grow out of your jesus fixation too.
But as far as the topic of the thread, which appears to have been
discarded long ago, if homosexuality is a "choice" then upon what legal
basis do others presume to take this choice away from an individual?
Well, no one can take away any choice to commit sin.
Sure they can, fool. All they have to do is to make it impossible to
perform certain acts. A choice is not solely a mental selection, but an
action or series of actions going along with it. If some of those
actions are no longer possible then those choices are closed off as
well. One might wish one could do certain things, but that is not the
same thing as being able to choose to do them.
However, suppose
someone chooses to commit the sin of murder.
OKay, I'll suppose that.
Even though they have
made the choice, they are often prevented from committing the actual
sin.
That's because the action very clearly causes harm and loss of rights to
others. As John Stuart Mill argued in _On Liberty_, the only
justification for depriving a person of his liberty should be when his
or her actions might reasonable endanger the rights of others. While
murder clearly does injure the rights of others, it is not clear that
homosexual acts do, at least in general.
By the same token, homosexuals are often prevented from
perpetrating their sin.
But you haven't shown that there is any legitimate justification for
this. You've simply admitted that homosexuals are deprived of
exercising freedoms that you've chosen to label "sins" according to your
ridiculous religious world views.
That is just the way it is.
'Fraid not, *****. Fortunately there is a constitution and a bill of
rights that protects us from assholes like you, who attempt to take away
the rights of others and say, "that is just the way it is" (like you're
some demented bruce hornsby impersonator or something).
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Stahl" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
08 Nov 2004 04:17:02 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at least a
week. Congrats, Robert!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
08 Nov 2004 09:21:10 PM |
|
|
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at least a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they agree with you.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
09 Nov 2004 12:52:50 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they agree with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or disagree
with?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
10 Nov 2004 07:17:07 PM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they agree with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
10 Nov 2004 08:20:26 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb would be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with your post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in how it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you as you
are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
11 Nov 2004 09:44:04 PM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb would be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with your post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in how it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you as you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
12 Nov 2004 07:02:07 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible. You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one. I said
I accept you as you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
15 Nov 2004 08:54:34 AM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime, even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible. You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one. I said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
15 Nov 2004 11:11:42 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible. You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one. I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
15 Nov 2004 08:58:34 PM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible. You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one. I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being killed by abortion.
Robert b. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
16 Nov 2004 07:38:52 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
16 Nov 2004 04:24:28 PM |
|
|
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "MrD" |
|
| Title: Re: : Choice and Homosexuality |
17 Nov 2004 12:45:49 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411161424.4aa29c29@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cncvrq$1fs$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411151858.8af8710@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cnanur$r7r$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411150654.5a471400@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cn2c6h$6kh$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411111944.71a5fbcc@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmui78$c20$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411101717.18496f2a@posting.google.com...
"MrD" <nachobiznez@all.com> wrote in message
news:<cmr3js$ngb$1@news.netins.net>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411081921.7dc96c8f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Stahl" <stahl@nospam.aecom.yu.edu> wrote in
message
news:<irednax66a5LchLcRVn-jA@giganews.com>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411080609.181b4799@posting.google.com...
Profanity is the attempt of a weak mind to make a
strong
statement.
Suppose that a homosexual were to attempt to
perpetrate
the
crime
of
homosexuality with a child. If the child tells
the
police
about
it,
the homosexual is arrested and convicted of the
crime,
even in
an
immoral pro-abortion society like this one. This
is
just
one
example
of how a homosexual is prevented from
participating in
the
sin
of
homosexuality. That is just the way it is.
Robert B. Winn
This is quite possibly the dumbest post I've read on
usenet
in
at
least
a
week. Congrats, Robert!
Well, I know that there are many pedophiles who would
say
they
agree
with
you.
Really, Robert? How do you know what pedophiles would
agree
or
disagree
with?
Pedophiles are in favor of pedophelia. I thought you
would be
able to
make that connection. Sorry if I expected more from you
than
was
there.
Sorry, but it doesn't follow that someone calling your post
dumb
would
be in
agreement with pedophiles. Pedophiles should actually agree
with
your
post
if it were correct. Are you saying that your post wasn't
correct in
how
it
protrayed pedophiles?
As to your expectations, you don't need to be sorry. I
accept
you
as
you
are.
Still trying to get an apology?
I see now why you keep misunderstanding what you read in the
bible.
You
can't read plainly spoken ideas and get the right answer.
I am not trying to get an apology, though you certainly owe me
one.
I
said
I accept you as you are.
Wonderful. Well, you accept all of my little faults, so I am not
going to worry about them around you.
I accept you as you are.
That shouldn't encourage you to be less than you should be, however.
I think we should all strive to be more moral animals.
Actually, I am a human being. You know, like the ones being killed by
abortion.
Human beings are also animals, Robert.
I really don't think you are like a fetus.
Why not? I have two arms and two legs. I can move just like a
fetus. What is the difference you see?
Ah, so you think a fetus has to have arms and legs to be human. I guess you
don't care about the embryo that is only a few cells. You are forwarding
your pro-abortion position now. I knew the truth would come out.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
