100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush



 Science > Abortion > 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "David W. Barnes"
Date: 30 Oct 2004 10:03:22 PM
Object: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush
Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm
Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.
.

User: "Navy Kurt"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 04 Nov 2004 12:57:50 AM
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.

if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.
.
User: "Elmo"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 12 Nov 2004 03:43:34 PM
In article <8b7b01f5.0411032257.76f3be3c@posting.google.com>, Navy Kurt
<navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.

People could say the same for us.
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 12 Nov 2004 09:34:00 PM
In article <121120041343344687%anto@sales.com>, Elmo <anto@sales.com>
wrote:

In article <8b7b01f5.0411032257.76f3be3c@posting.google.com>, Navy Kurt
<navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


People could say the same for us.

LOL! People DO say the same for us.
.


User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 04 Nov 2004 07:24:33 AM
Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.

"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves [days]
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Socialism is a Mental Disease"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 04 Nov 2004 11:38:37 AM
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:24:33 GMT,
(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves [days]
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."

Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right? What a retard
you are!
--
"A society that robs an individual of the product of his
effort... is... a mob held together by institutionalized
gang rule." -- Ayn Rand
.
User: "Matty"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 04 Nov 2004 06:46:45 PM
On 2004-11-05 04:38:37 +1100, Socialism is a Mental Disease
<root@localhost.> said:

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:24:33 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves [days]
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right? What a retard
you are!

About as democratic as Singapore.
Matty
--
"If a nation could not prosper without the enjoyment of perfect liberty
and perfect justice, there is not in the world a nation which could
ever have prospered." - The Wealth of Nations, Book IV, Chapter IX
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this
world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or
all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of
government except all those other forms that have been tried from time
to time." - Sir Winston Churchill, Hansard, November 11, 1947
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 04 Nov 2004 11:17:04 PM
Socialism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves [days]
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?

He is in Iraq.
He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.
Give him four more and he should be able to top Saddam's number easily.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Elmo"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 12 Nov 2004 03:44:54 PM
In article <cmf2cg$76o$1@bolt.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:

Socialism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and vote
for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves [days]
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.
Give him four more and he should be able to top Saddam's number easily.

He will also kill more Americans then Bin Laden.
.

User: "GoatChomper"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 05 Nov 2004 03:03:36 AM
Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmf2cg$76o$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Socialism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message

news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.

Proof?
.
User: "Yardpilot"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 05 Nov 2004 09:00:51 AM
"GoatChomper" <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:10omgfb74kdquf5@corp.supernews.com...


Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmf2cg$76o$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Socialism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message

news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?

He don' need no steenking proof!
.
User: "GoatChomper"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 05 Nov 2004 01:31:56 PM
Yardpilot <yardpilot@gorge.net> wrote in message
news:10on5g2r7pfipe0@corp.supernews.com...


"GoatChomper" <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:10omgfb74kdquf5@corp.supernews.com...


Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmf2cg$76o$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Socialism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Navy Kurt <navykurt@yahoo.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message

news:<301020042003220978%spam@aol.com>...

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


He don' need no steenking proof!

Yeah, I keep forgetting.....for libdems, denunciation is its own proof.
.


User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 05 Nov 2004 11:51:02 PM
GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?

As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.
Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Socialism is a Mental Disease"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 01:02:27 AM
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:51:02 GMT,
(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <

> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596

How is it asking for hard proof a sign of dumbness or ignorance? It
appears to me that asking for proof is a sign that the person is
unwilling to believe unsubstantiated crap, which, I suggest, is a sign
of intelligence.
--
"A society that robs an individual of the product of his
effort... is... a mob held together by institutionalized
gang rule." -- Ayn Rand
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 12:29:57 PM
Fascism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:51:02 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <

> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


How is it asking for hard proof a sign of dumbness or ignorance?

It's a sign that the neocon doesn't deal in reality and isn't even
aware of what's going on.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Yardpilot"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 02:05:30 PM
"Ray Fischer" <
> wrote in message
news:cmj574$qm4$1@bolt.sonic.net...

Fascism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:51:02 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <

> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life

and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


How is it asking for hard proof a sign of dumbness or ignorance?


It's a sign that the neocon doesn't deal in reality and isn't even
aware of what's going on.

Ah, so "Ray Fischer" doesn't need proof of anything, whatever he says is
good enough for him.
.

User: "Socialism is a Mental Disease"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 01:09:57 PM
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:29:57 GMT,
(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


Fascism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:51:02 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <

> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


How is it asking for hard proof a sign of dumbness or ignorance?


It's a sign that the neocon doesn't deal in reality and isn't even
aware of what's going on.

No one is 100% aware of what's going on. It's simply impossible. Our
sensory systems wouldn't be able to handle the load. As such, your
posture is one of ignorance and arrogance, not unlike what you accuse
the neocons of being.
--
"A society that robs an individual of the product of his
effort... is... a mob held together by institutionalized
gang rule." -- Ayn Rand
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:06:27 PM
Fascism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 18:29:57 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


Fascism is a Mental Disease <root@localhost.> wrote:

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 05:51:02 GMT,

(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <

> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves years
ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


How is it asking for hard proof a sign of dumbness or ignorance?


It's a sign that the neocon doesn't deal in reality and isn't even
aware of what's going on.


No one is 100% aware of what's going on. It's simply impossible. Our

That's no excuse for willful ignorance.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Socialism is a Mental Disease"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:26:56 PM
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:06:27 GMT,
(Ray
Fischer) wrote:


No one is 100% aware of what's going on. It's simply impossible. Our


That's no excuse for willful ignorance.

Yes, it is. For instance, I choose to be ignorant about brain surgery
because I have other competing interests. But thanks for confimring
you are indeed an ignorant, arrogant retard.
--
"A society that robs an individual of the product of his
effort... is... a mob held together by institutionalized
gang rule." -- Ayn Rand
.





User: "GoatChomper"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 02:45:03 AM
Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmhoo6$bom$1@bolt.sonic.net...

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596

We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 12:30:21 PM
GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of
violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.

Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "GoatChomper"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 02:55:53 PM
Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmj57s$qqv$1@bolt.sonic.net...

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate

of

violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life

and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.


Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?

As I never claimed there were any there, your statement is a non-sequitur as
well as a *****-poor attempt to dodge.
.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:07:39 PM
GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:


Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmj57s$qqv$1@bolt.sonic.net...

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate

of

violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life

and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush] themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.


Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?


As I never claimed there were any there, your statement is a non-sequitur as

I bet you also refuse to accept that 6,000,000 "undesirables" were
killed by the Nazis and 20,000,000 "enemies of the state" were killed
by Stalin.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "Scout"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:15:00 PM
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmjeeq$7ke$1@bolt.sonic.net...

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:


Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cmj57s$qqv$1@bolt.sonic.net...

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message

GoatChomper <GoatChomper@lycos.com> wrote:

Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message


Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate

of

violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq,
scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm

Pro-Life my *****. Every one of you who claim you are pro-life

and

vote

for Bush are hypocrites.


if the iraqis had balls they would have ousted sadam themselves

years

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice.


"If [Americans] had balls they would have ousted [Bush]
themselves

[days]

ago. they're paying the price for their cowardice."


Oh, I see, Bush is a dictator without opposition, right?


He is in Iraq.

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three
years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.


Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?


As I never claimed there were any there, your statement is a non-sequitur
as


I bet you also refuse to accept that 6,000,000 "undesirables" were
killed by the Nazis and 20,000,000 "enemies of the state" were killed
by Stalin.

<yawn>
The issue of contention is your claim that Bush "killed close to a hundred
thousand people in just three years"
Your attempt to divert attention and change the subject doesn't alter the
fact that you were asked to prove this claim and so far are trying
desperately to avoid doing so.
.
User: "Roy Blankenship"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:22:20 PM
Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:e_GdndVPeJ1LoxDcRVn-jg@adelphia.com...

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three
years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.


Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?


As I never claimed there were any there, your statement is a

non-sequitur

as


I bet you also refuse to accept that 6,000,000 "undesirables" were
killed by the Nazis and 20,000,000 "enemies of the state" were killed
by Stalin.


<yawn>

The issue of contention is your claim that Bush "killed close to a hundred
thousand people in just three years"

Your attempt to divert attention and change the subject doesn't alter the
fact that you were asked to prove this claim and so far are trying
desperately to avoid doing so.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2004-11-05/pols_capitol.html
.
User: "Scout"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 03:40:53 PM
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ggbjd.2346$_J2.72@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...


Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:e_GdndVPeJ1LoxDcRVn-jg@adelphia.com...

He's killed close to a hundred thousand people in just three
years.


Proof?


As expected, the neocon is dumb, ignorant, and proud of it.

Start here:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596


We want proof, not junk-science leftist samizdat.


Where's the proof of Iraq's WMD, hypocrite?


As I never claimed there were any there, your statement is a

non-sequitur

as


I bet you also refuse to accept that 6,000,000 "undesirables" were
killed by the Nazis and 20,000,000 "enemies of the state" were killed
by Stalin.


<yawn>

The issue of contention is your claim that Bush "killed close to a
hundred
thousand people in just three years"

Your attempt to divert attention and change the subject doesn't alter the
fact that you were asked to prove this claim and so far are trying
desperately to avoid doing so.


http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2004-11-05/pols_capitol.html

"extrapolating from that sample"
"researchers estimate"
"Making conservative assumptions"
In short your assertion is based on assumptions, estimates, and
extrapolations. It is based on a sample of 1,000 households which may or may
not be representative, and given some of those are going to be anti-invasion
they will inflate their numbers by claiming more deaths than occurred.
Further the number given includes deaths by means other than those caused by
US forces.
Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive than a
"poll".
.
User: "Roy Blankenship"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 06 Nov 2004 09:23:25 PM
Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:p--dnegqGYN62RDcRVn-1Q@adelphia.com...


"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ggbjd.2346$_J2.72@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...


http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2004-11-05/pols_capitol.html


"extrapolating from that sample"
"researchers estimate"
"Making conservative assumptions"

In short your assertion is based on assumptions, estimates, and
extrapolations. It is based on a sample of 1,000 households which may or

may

not be representative, and given some of those are going to be

anti-invasion

they will inflate their numbers by claiming more deaths than occurred.
Further the number given includes deaths by means other than those caused

by

US forces.

Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive than a
"poll".

Then do your own homework, you whiny litle pissant. Why don't you go count
the bodies yourself if you are so demanding of PROOF. We did a BAD fucking
thing over there, and more and more of this ***** is going to surface as we
go, and dumbshits like you are going to be sitting at your fucking little
computer demanding proof. ***** you.
.
User: "Scout"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 07 Nov 2004 05:19:44 PM
"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Nygjd.7246$Gm6.7076@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...


Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:p--dnegqGYN62RDcRVn-1Q@adelphia.com...


"Roy Blankenship" <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ggbjd.2346$_J2.72@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...


http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2004-11-05/pols_capitol.html


"extrapolating from that sample"
"researchers estimate"
"Making conservative assumptions"

In short your assertion is based on assumptions, estimates, and
extrapolations. It is based on a sample of 1,000 households which may or

may

not be representative, and given some of those are going to be

anti-invasion

they will inflate their numbers by claiming more deaths than occurred.
Further the number given includes deaths by means other than those caused

by

US forces.

Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive than a
"poll".


Then do your own homework, you whiny litle pissant.

I accept your admission that the assertion can't be supported by you.
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 07 Nov 2004 12:29:43 AM
Roy Blankenship <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:

Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message

Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive than a
"poll".


Then do your own homework, you whiny litle pissant. Why don't you go count
the bodies yourself if you are so demanding of PROOF. We did a BAD fucking
thing over there, and more and more of this ***** is going to surface as we
go, and dumbshits like you are going to be sitting at your fucking little
computer demanding proof. ***** you.

What really appalling is that Saddam is in prison because he killed
300,000 people imposing order in Iraq, and now Bush is doing the exact
same thing. He's killed 100,000 people and is about to kill thousands
more in Fallujah in order to impose order in Iraq.
No wonder Bush hates Saddam - he doesn't like the competition.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
User: "No One"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 07 Nov 2004 01:30:59 AM
(Ray Fischer) writes:

Roy Blankenship <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:

Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message


Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive than a
"poll".



What really appalling is that Saddam is in prison because he killed
300,000 people imposing order in Iraq, and now Bush is doing the exact
same thing. He's killed 100,000 people and is about to kill thousands
more in Fallujah in order to impose order in Iraq.

No wonder Bush hates Saddam - he doesn't like the competition.

Saddam's a rank amateur by comparision. It took him over 20 years to
kill 300,000 people. Bush has 1/3 that number less than 2 years.
.
User: "BOB"

Title: Re: 100,000 Dead at the Hand of GW Bush 07 Nov 2004 11:02:11 AM
No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in
news:m3actuxgl6.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:

Roy Blankenship <pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:

Scout <4guns@adelphia.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message


Sorry, but I'm going to ask for something a bit more conclusive
than a "poll".



What really appalling is that Saddam is in prison because he killed
300,000 people imposing order in Iraq, and now Bush is doing the exact
same thing. He's killed 100,000 people and is about to kill thousands
more in Fallujah in order to impose order in Iraq.

No wonder Bush hates Saddam - he doesn't like the competition.


Saddam's a rank amateur by comparision. It took him over 20 years to
kill 300,000 people. Bush has 1/3 that number less than 2 years.

And the so-called "pro-life" repugs are jumping for joy about it. Go
figure.
.


















  Page 1 of 5

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 


Related Articles
LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT - Americans Spent 2 Trillion $$$ On Bush's Oil War Based on Lies So We Could Pay 100% More at the Pumps & for OIL??????????????????????????????????
NPR is finally 100% Jew
The "Religious" Radical Right is WRONG almost 100% of the time.
I provide abortions for $100
I provide abortions for $100
100,000 dead in iraq
Re: Abortionist Morgentaler Featured in new CTV Movie-Makes $100's Millions From Killing Babies!!
100,000 Civilian Deaths Estimated in Iraq
Study: 100,000 civilian deaths due to Iraq invasion
Study Puts Iraqi Deaths of Civilians at 100,000
*post 100* >> GOOD NEWS! - Over 2000 years ago Jesus Christ suffered and died on a cross and rose from the dead so that we can be forgiven of our sins(misdeeds) and have a home in Heaven when this life has ended. Most people just don't know how to as
*post 100* >> GOOD NEWS! - Over 2000 years ago Jesus Christ suffered and died on a cross and rose from the dead so that we can be forgiven of our sins(misdeeds) and have a home in Heaven when this life has ended. Most people just don't know how to as
A ***** with a 100 Dollar Guarantee ... no strings !!!
Re: $100. Reward for real name & address for spartakus@my-deja.com
Re: $100. Reward for real name & address for spartakus@my-deja.com
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER