Science > Abortion > 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: NO SOCIETY HAS EVER ABORTED ITS WAY TO PROSPERITY
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Aug 2005 05:59:17 PM |
| Object: |
101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: NO SOCIETY HAS EVER ABORTED ITS WAY TO PROSPERITY |
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
I AM THE COWBOY RANGER, HERE TO EDUCATE MEN & LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD.
THE ULTIMATE RULE: NEVER BUY A RING It is well-known that America is
headed for a communistic matriarchal dictatorship. Women all favor big
government because they're used to getting fucked by any liar who
promises to pay for them.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
THE RULES OF ENAGEMENT: NO SOCIETY HAS EVER ABORTED ITS WAY TO
PROSPERITY
Right now women are aborting thousands of children every day so they
can buy more shoes and biggers SUVs to crash into other SUVs. Those
thousands of children--your kids--would have gone on to become
productive citizens, brain surgeons, inventors, leaders, and
entrepreneurs. But now they're dead, and so's your social security, and
your grand-children too.
NO SOCIETY HAS EVER ABORTED ITS WAY TO PROSPERITY
HEED THESE RULES OF ENAGEMENT, YOUNG MEN!!!!
THE ULTIMATE RULE: NEVER BUY A RING
It is well-known that America is headed for a communistic matriarchal
dictatorship.
Women all favor big government because they're used to getting fucked
by any liar who promises to pay for them.
CHAPTER 1: THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
0. A pickup line is only as good as the person using it.
1. If she dresses provacatively, treat her provacatively. She'll like
it.
2. If she flirts with other guys, look for other girls to flirt
with--you'll need to be active in this, just to keep up. Women flirt
passively, so you'll never beat her at her own game.
3. If she's had sex before you, and she doesn't want to have sex with
you, then you might just be a meal ticket while she rebounds. How does
it feel, punk--you buy her meals so she can afford drinks when she goes
out clubbing with her friends, so I can grind on her ***** for free, slip
that thong off later, and blast my white manlieless on her *****.
4. If she wears underwear for all to see, then never pay to see it.
5. If she's good friends with some guy she used to screw, sooner or
later you're gonna get screwed. Ask if you can watch.
6. If she drinks a lot, start looking for a different girl, but don't
tell her, as that would be confrontational and impolite--let her figure
it out when she's drunk off her ***** one night and sees you out with
her.
6.5 If she tells you she has a boyfriend, it means she'd fucking out of
wedlock. Go ahead and ***** her out of wedlock too. Or don't. Go find
some guy to go home with--I don't give a *****.
7. If she thinks that she's an artist or writer and her work sucks, be
careful--next thing you know she'll be thinking she's a virgin.
8. If she has credit card debt and college loans, let some other sucker
pay for it.
9. If things are getting serious and she needs to keep going out
clubbing with her friends, then things are not getting serious.
10. If she tries to spend the night but never puts out, ask her what
she's thinking. She'll think you're sensitive and put out. If she
doesn't, ask her to leave so you can whack off.
11. Never ask a girl to marry you unless, 1) she is debt free, and 2)
you want children. Do not marry a girl just to have a DVD-rental
partner.
12. If she ever lumps you in with "all men" in a snotty sort of way, or
condescendingly says, "all men are alike" chances are every other man
has fucked her to.
13. If she ever says that all men think about is sex, ask her why she's
the one wearing lacy bras and thong underwear. Is it just more
comfortable having a fishing line riding up her *****?
14. If she's been with more than three people, chances are you might be
the fourth, but you won't be the fifth through the seventeenth.
15. If she bitches and moans about evil conservatives on a date, make a
mental note to ditch her after you've spent a couple liberal nights
with her.
16. If she fucks one of your friends and wants another chance, you
might as well ***** her one more time.
17. Always go until a girl says stop--you can find out a lot about
where she's been and where she's going.
18. If she dresses provacatively, flirts, and then doesn't put out, ask
her out on a date and don't show up. If you meet her out later, she
will ***** you out of respect.
19. If she ever bitches about some guy who fucked and chucked her, then
you know how she was born to be treated. If she didn't see it coming
then, chances are she won't see it coming now.
20. If she discusses her feminist classes, you don't have to pay for
anything that night--in fact, wait for her to pay.
21. If you ask her out, and she doesn't mention her
boyfriend until after you've picked her up, chances are he's going to
be pissed if he ever finds out what happened after all of that.
22. If a girl brings up some guy who raped her, who she never pressed
charges against, and starts accusing all men of being rapists, call
911, hand her the phone, and tell her you're not a vigilante.
23. Always tell your friends that you don't mind sharing if they don't
mind going second.
24. If a girl has ever kissed another woman or been in a threesome,
then before you go any further, you should watch her in one of these.
Otherwise you'll go nuts trying to figure out the details.
25. When a girl tells you she slept with someone else, it is over if
you are half a man. But don't break up with her that night, as chances
are she only told you to get a rise. Kindof shrug, bang her a couple
more times, or until she thinks everything's cool, and then lose her
number. Remember this one ***** rule for woman you become close to.
26. Once upon a time drunk, easy women could only be found at brothels.
Thanks to feminism, they can now be found at colleges.
27. Women who flirt and don't follow up abuse their fleeting power.
It's exactly what they'll do in divorce court infront of the
bong-smoking judge, so get the hell out.
28. Until women all gather in a great big room and agree to stop acting
like sluts and tempting each-other's boyfriends, it ain't gonna change.
29. Far more women enjoy deconstructing Shakespeare and the Bible
rather than lamenting about the immorality of hiphop.
30. Most people lack the imagination to see how
relationships could be better, so girls live like animals. And guess
what--it's going to get worse until conservatives lead a renaissance.
31. If a girl is majoring in feminist studies and doesn't put out, ask
her if she's been taking notes
32. If she watches Sex and the City, you have full license to do
anything with her you see on the show. In fact it is your obligation
and duty. If you don't satiate her appetite, somebody else will.
Hell-I'll do it for you.
33. If she claims to be a Christian and then sings along to eminen's
"Superman," ask her if sometimes she feels overpowered by Satan. Never
disappoint Satan on a date, or Satan will make her ***** some other guy.
34. Always give a girl the benefit of the doubt-give her romantic
poetry, send her flowers, until you see her drunk. Then *****'n'chuck
her.
35. Time is on your side in all of this. Her clock's ticking-yours
isn't.
36. A "friend with benefits" is no longer a friend when the benefits
are gone. And how long does it take to get bored doing some chick who
doesn't respect herself?
37. Now that all girls take the pill, anal really isn't necessary, is
it?
38. Only the liberal elite and their "enlightened" republican brethren
and are allowed to make money off of porn and hold higher office.
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
11 Aug 2005 10:21:40 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a paying job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she meant, and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
The very same claim
that you then tried to dispute with your childish word games above.
Word games?
You seem not to have learned how to play that game.
Apparently, you never get tired of making yourself look like a stupid
*****.
Your forte, stupid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
11 Aug 2005 09:26:39 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a paying job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she meant, and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
The very same claim
that you then tried to dispute with your childish word games above.
Word games?
Quite pretending to be stupid. Or, maybe your aren't pretending.
You seem not to have learned how to play that game.
After seeing how immature and childish it makes you appear, why would I
have any interest in such things?
Apparently, you never get tired of making yourself look like a stupid
*****.
Your forte, stupid.
;) Still not tired I see.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
12 Aug 2005 12:22:05 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
The very same claim
that you then tried to dispute with your childish word games above.
Word games?
Quite pretending to be stupid. Or, maybe your aren't pretending.
I do not need to pretend that I am stupid because:
1. I am not stupid.
2. I am not Pro-Choice.
You seem not to have learned how to play that game.
After seeing how immature and childish it makes you appear, why would I
have any interest in such things?
Because you can't even deal with me on such a simple level.
You know you are defeated by men like me.
You have no option other than submitting to my will.
Apparently, you never get tired of making yourself look like a stupid
*****.
Your forte, stupid.
;) Still not tired I see.
Of making you into the fool?
Not even a little.
.
|
|
|
| User: "lukne" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
14 Aug 2005 02:54:14 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
The very same claim
that you then tried to dispute with your childish word games above.
Word games?
Quite pretending to be stupid. Or, maybe your aren't pretending.
I do not need to pretend that I am stupid because:
1. I am not stupid.
2. I am not Pro-Choice.
You seem not to have learned how to play that game.
After seeing how immature and childish it makes you appear, why would I
have any interest in such things?
Because you can't even deal with me on such a simple level.
You know you are defeated by men like me.
You have no option other than submitting to my will.
HEhehe! Love reading this little boy's psychopathic fantasy.
Soc.men(tals)continue to make me laugh. If nothing else, you boys are
quite entertaining.
Apparently, you never get tired of making yourself look like a stupid
*****.
Your forte, stupid.
;) Still not tired I see.
Of making you into the fool?
Not even a little.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
12 Aug 2005 12:40:38 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
The very same claim
that you then tried to dispute with your childish word games above.
Word games?
Quite pretending to be stupid. Or, maybe your aren't pretending.
I do not need to pretend that I am stupid because:
you are.
1. I am not stupid.
Many people in this newsgroup have proven otherwise. The fact that you
deny reality doesn't change things.
2. I am not Pro-Choice.
Which only goes to prove that there's at least one stupid pro-lifer in
the world.
You seem not to have learned how to play that game.
After seeing how immature and childish it makes you appear, why would I
have any interest in such things?
Because you can't even deal with me on such a simple level.
If you think not giving in to your hatred means I don't deal with you
on a simple level then I guess your statement is correct.
You know you are defeated by men like me.
I guess that explains why I'm still prochoice and you haven't convinced
me to start hating women and become a prolifer like you. This little
fact is a pretty good indication that you haven't defeated me at all.
You have no option other than submitting to my will.
LOL!!!!! If I had no other option than to submit to your will I'd be a
woman-hating prolifer like you. However, since I am prochoice AGAINST
your will, it looks like your statement about me having no option but
to submit to your will is just more "Johnny *****(tm)". But, if
that's what it takes for you to have the warm fuzzy feeling inside, you
keep telling yourself that and the rest of us will stick to dealing
with reality.
Apparently, you never get tired of making yourself look like a stupid
*****.
Your forte, stupid.
;) Still not tired I see.
Of making you into the fool?
Not even a little.
You don't have time to make anyone else look like a fool, you're too
busy coming up new ways of too keep that title for yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
13 Aug 2005 08:57:31 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
13 Aug 2005 12:47:11 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Cracklin claimed that you didn't work for a living and you didn't pay
taxes levied on wages. You claimed you did pay those taxes, but now we
see you arguing that the tax law doesn't require you to pay those
taxes. So, LIAR, which one of your statements do you want to stick
with, the one where you claim to pay taxes or the one where you claim
to not pay taxes? LOL!!
Next time, try to do a better job of keeping your lies straight.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
13 Aug 2005 03:32:20 PM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123955230.991008.161000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's
a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control
issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that
feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody
else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes
like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid
word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original
claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not
worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Cracklin claimed that you didn't work for a living and you didn't pay
taxes levied on wages.
Both of which would be lies.
You claimed you did pay those taxes,
I did. I still pay taxes.
but now we
see you arguing that the tax law doesn't require you to pay those
taxes.
Care to provide a direct quote where I said what you say I said? You false
accuser.
So, LIAR,
What you just did was lie.
which one of your statements do you want to stick
with,
The statements I made.
the one where you claim to pay taxes or the one where you claim
to not pay taxes?
The statements which you did not comprehend and which you misconstrued are
the statements I am sticking with.
LOL!!
You're delusional?
Next time, try to do a better job of keeping your lies straight.
I have no trouble with that since I do not lie.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
14 Aug 2005 12:54:52 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123955230.991008.161000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after. It's
a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control
issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that
feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody
else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes
like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play stupid
word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original
claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not
worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Cracklin claimed that you didn't work for a living and you didn't pay
taxes levied on wages.
Both of which would be lies.
Show that you currently hold a job and pay taxes levied against those
wages.
You claimed you did pay those taxes,
I did.
Did? We're not talking about the time before you took your little
hissy fit over you employer and refused to work to try to teach them a
lesson, you leach.
I still pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what is being
discussed. As usual, more word games.
but now we
see you arguing that the tax law doesn't require you to pay those
taxes.
Care to provide a direct quote where I said what you say I said? You false
accuser.
Johnny said, "I work, and I do pay taxes."
Pr0r3p said, "You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what
she meant, and
you know it."
Johnny said, "Read the tax code and see why."
So, you go from claiming to pay taxes to then stating that the tax code
doesn't require you to pay taxes, which is what I claimed. The facts
are right here in front of your eyes. What lie are you going to come
up with this time to try and backpedal you way out of this?
(the quotes above were take from this very thread, posts dated
10-Aug-2005 and 11-Aug-2005).
So, LIAR,
What you just did was lie.
No, I just provided the quotes you requested. That would make YOU the
liar.
which one of your statements do you want to stick
with,
The statements I made.
The statements you made contradict one another, therefore, one has to
be a lie.
the one where you claim to pay taxes or the one where you claim
to not pay taxes?
The statements which you did not comprehend and which you misconstrued are
the statements I am sticking with.
They contradict one another, which I just showed above. Keep
backpedaling, liar.
LOL!!
You're delusional?
Next time, try to do a better job of keeping your lies straight.
I have no trouble with that since I do not lie.
The facts that show you lied by claiming to pay taxes and then claiming
the tax code doesn't require you to pay taxes is directly above. Deal
with it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
14 Aug 2005 01:33:03 PM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124042092.196289.76680@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123955230.991008.161000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after.
It's
a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control
issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that
feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody
else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes
like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play
stupid
word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original
claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not
worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty
enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Cracklin claimed that you didn't work for a living and you didn't pay
taxes levied on wages.
Both of which would be lies.
Show that you currently hold a job and pay taxes levied against those
wages.
Why should I?
Where did I say I do?
I did. I observe and obey the tax codes.
You claimed you did pay those taxes,
I did.
Did?
Yes. You got a problem with english?
Sure seems like it.
We're not talking about the time before you took your little
hissy fit over you employer
What hissy fit?
and refused to work
When did I *refuse* to work?
to try to teach them a
lesson, you leach.
What lesson, leechboy.?
I still pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages,
And, you still don't understand the tax code?
which is what is being
discussed.
You can avoid taxes on wages by not earning any wages.
As usual, more word games.
From you?
I observe the tax codes.
Why are you bitching at me?
but now we
see you arguing that the tax law doesn't require you to pay those
taxes.
Care to provide a direct quote where I said what you say I said? You
false
accuser.
Johnny said, "I work, and I do pay taxes."
Which is true.
Pr0r3p said, "You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what
she meant, and
you know it."
Where did she say that, false accuser?
Johnny said, "Read the tax code and see why."
You understand it now?
So, you go from claiming to pay taxes to then stating that the tax code
doesn't require you to pay taxes,
Where did I type that *****?
which is what I claimed.
But, you are showing yourself to be a liar, a false accuser.
The facts
are right here in front of your eyes.
I see no facts to support any of your flase accusations against me.
What lie are you going to come
up with this time to try and backpedal you way out of this?
I did NOT lie to begin with.
Is it your practice to resort to lies since you can not handle living
truthfully now?
When did you decide to cash in your chips and go with lies as you already
did with me?
(the quotes above were take from this very thread, posts dated
10-Aug-2005 and 11-Aug-2005).
And, you have done nothing, nada, nil, zilch to prove that I lied at any
time in any manner whatsoever.
So, LIAR,
What you just did was lie.
No,
Sorry. You, as a liar, are forbidden from making that determination.
I just provided the quotes you requested.
Which quotes?
The ones where I told the truth, and another one where you veered off into
falsehoods.
That would make YOU the
liar.
You will never get by with me with that demeanor.
which one of your statements do you want to stick
with,
The statements I made.
The statements you made contradict one another, therefore, one has to
be a lie.
No, they don't.
The demonstrated habit of yours to make erroneous conclusions based upon
your ill-conceived notions without comrephending the actual words that were
written is what is evident.
the one where you claim to pay taxes or the one where you claim
to not pay taxes?
The statements which you did not comprehend and which you misconstrued
are
the statements I am sticking with.
They contradict one another,
They don't. Not even a little.
which I just showed above.
Your lack of understanding is what anyone can see, and your tendency to lash
out with false accusations are evident.
Keep
backpedaling, liar.
You're the liar, liar.
I told the truth.
I have an ace in the hole which should clue you in to stop making false
accusations against me.
LOL!!
You're delusional?
Next time, try to do a better job of keeping your lies straight.
I have no trouble with that since I do not lie.
The facts that show you lied
Another lie from you.
by claiming to pay taxes and then claiming
the tax code doesn't require you to pay taxes is directly above.
Show me where I typed that verbatiom, *****.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how little
you actually know about tax codes?
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
14 Aug 2005 09:06:07 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124042092.196289.76680@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123955230.991008.161000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123868437.951459.112970@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123813599.224424.204080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123768394.363863.198170@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123694673.480966.257380@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f82b41$0$16583$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:6IUJe.909$3p.94@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Sneekers" <Sneekers_loves_kitties@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:r0mef1l6m4hpd6tftf7m6ov6e71eo0khro@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:08:02 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote in message
news:42f6dcc3$0$16548$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
<rulesofengagement101@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123457227.542102.277980@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
No. Make no mistake. It's not revenge he's after.
It's
a
reckoning.
...
http://101rulesofengagement.blogspot.com/
There will be no peace until the feminists are
vanquished.
===================================
What's wrong with feminists? Do you have control
issues?
I guess so. The issues of the lack of control that
feminists
and
their
duped
men...
You little pantsy--you see fit to control everybody
else's
life
but
you don't have the balls to fix your own.
You're lying.
=========================
Then why aren't you out there working and paying taxes
like
other
able
bodied men?
I work,
She meant you don't work for a living, ie, you don't have a
paying
job.
Of course, you know what she meant but choose to play
stupid
word
games.
and I do pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what she
meant,
and
you know it.
Read the tax code and see why.
So, essentially this is an admission that Cracklin's original
claim
that you don't work for a living, was correct.
Your conclusion is not based on fact.
Your misconception is erroneous.
Lack of evidence to defend your claim is noted, and therefore not
worth
the time you took to write it. As though that's a big surprise.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty
enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Diversionary tactic noted. Keep running, fool.
My words and the law, which includes the tax code, are plenty enough,
abundantly so, to prove my statements.
Cracklin claimed that you didn't work for a living and you didn't pay
taxes levied on wages.
Both of which would be lies.
Show that you currently hold a job and pay taxes levied against those
wages.
Why should I?
Where did I say I do?
I did. I observe and obey the tax codes.
Look two posts up, retard.
You claimed you did pay those taxes,
I did.
Did?
Yes. You got a problem with english?
Sure seems like it.
No, you're the one with the english problem Einstein. "Did" is a
reference to something you DID in the past, we're talking about the
year 2005 idiotboy.
We're not talking about the time before you took your little
hissy fit over you employer
What hissy fit?
You know, when you took them to court, lost the case, and then refused
to work to try and make some kind of point. It appears you have memory
problems.
and refused to work
When did I *refuse* to work?
After you lost your court case with your employer, retard.
to try to teach them a
lesson, you leach.
What lesson, leechboy.?
See above, it's already been addressed. As usual, you act like you
don't know what anyone is referring to. Keep up the good work of
showing your "intelligence", idiotboy.
I still pay taxes.
You don't pay taxes levied against wages,
And, you still don't understand the tax code?
Which has what to do with the fact that you don't work for a living and
don't pay taxes levied against wages (which was the original claim)?
Let me save you the energy of firinig up that one functioning neuron,
the answer is NOTHING.
which is what is being
discussed.
You can avoid taxes on wages by not earning any wages.
Exactly, which is what Cracklin claims you do, she said you don't work
for a living, and don't pay wage taxes. This is the claim you started
arguing against, but now admit to. Damn, you are stupid.
As usual, more word games.
From you?
I observe the tax codes.
Why are you bitching at me?
but now we
see you arguing that the tax law doesn't require you to pay those
taxes.
Care to provide a direct quote where I said what you say I said? You
false
accuser.
Johnny said, "I work, and I do pay taxes."
Which is true.
Pr0r3p said, "You don't pay taxes levied against wages, which is what
she meant, and
you know it."
Where did she say that, false accuser?
Learn to read, *****. It's all in this very thread. You knew what
she was referring too, but chose to play childish word games instead.
Johnny said, "Read the tax code and see why."
You understand it now?
I've understood all along, it's you that keeps changing your mind about
whether you pay wage taxes or not.
So, you go from claiming to pay taxes to then stating that the tax code
doesn't require you to pay taxes,
Where did I type that *****?
Directly above in the quote, *****. Learn to read.
which is what I claimed.
But, you are showing yourself to be a liar, a false accuser.
Show me where. I've provided the quotes which show you claiming to
wage taxes and then claiming to not have too. You're the damn liar.
The facts
are right here in front of your eyes.
I see no facts to support any of your flase accusations against me.
That's because you're a moron who doesn't understand simple english.
What lie are you going to come
up with this time to try and backpedal you way out of this?
I did NOT lie to begin with.
One of your statements is a lie.
Is it your practice to resort to lies since you can not handle living
truthfully now?
One of your statements is a lie.
When did you decide to cash in your chips and go with lies as you already
did with me?
One of your statements is a lie. I've show it directly above.
(the quotes above were take from this very thread, posts dated
10-Aug-2005 and 11-Aug-2005).
And, you have done nothing, nada, nil, zilch to prove that I lied at any
time in any manner whatsoever.
I sure did. The quotes are directly above, and I even provided the
dates of the postings for easy reference in this thread. The fact that
you can't read and comprehend english doesn't change that.
So, LIAR,
What you just did was lie.
No,
Sorry. You, as a liar, are forbidden from making that determination.
I just provided the quotes you requested.
Which quotes?
The ones above, dipshit.
The ones where I told the truth, and another one where you veered off into
falsehoods.
You made two statements that contradict one another. One of them has
to be a lie, LIAR.
That would make YOU the
liar.
You will never get by with me with that demeanor.
Who cares, dipshit? I'm only here to expose your hatred and lying, and
it appears to be burning you ***** based on the backpedaling that you're
doing.
which one of your statements do you want to stick
with,
The statements I made.
The statements you made contradict one another, therefore, one has to
be a lie.
No, they don't.
The demonstrated habit of yours to make erroneous conclusions based upon
your ill-conceived notions without comrephending the actual words that were
written is what is evident.
I've shown the two statements that contradict one another, deal with
it.
the one where you claim to pay taxes or the one where you claim
to not pay taxes?
The statements which you did not comprehend and which you misconstrued
are
the statements I am sticking with.
They contradict one another,
They don't. Not even a little.
which I just showed above.
Your lack of understanding is what anyone can see, and your tendency to lash
out with false accusations are evident.
The only thing people are seeing is your lies. Keep up the good work.
Keep
backpedaling, liar.
You're the liar, liar.
I told the truth.
I have an ace in the hole which should clue you in to stop making false
accusations against me.
"Ace in the hole"? LOL!!!
LOL!!
You're delusional?
Next time, try to do a better job of keeping your lies straight.
I have no trouble with that since I do not lie.
The facts that show you lied
Another lie from you.
by claiming to pay taxes and then claiming
the tax code doesn't require you to pay taxes is directly above.
Show me where I typed that verbatiom, *****.
Verbatim? There's your problem dumbshit, you don't have to say it
verbatim to imply and/or infer the meaning. Your inability to get
beyond "verbatim" is the source of your reading comprehension problems.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Exactly, and the fact that you don't earn wages is what your arguing
against, which is obviously a stupid thing to do when you then admit
that you don't earn wages.
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
You STILL don't earn wages, which was Cracklin's original claim, that
went about arguing over.
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how little
you actually know about tax codes?
I don't disagree that you don't page taxes on wages you don't earn. My
claim has been that you don't earn wages and don't pay wage taxes.
Now, we see you admitting that you don't earn wages and pay wage taxes.
Why the hell did you go about arguing against that if that's the
truth?
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
And, given your stupidity, that's exactly what I would expect your
opinion to be. Keep up the good work Sherlock.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
15 Aug 2005 08:01:53 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124071567.053349.286520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
Show me where I typed that verbatim, *****.
Verbatim? There's your problem dumbshit, you don't have to say it
verbatim to imply and/or infer the meaning.
Wrong, you god-damned false accuser.
You are the god-damned false accuser who is inferring the wrong information
and assuming you can twist my words by doing such god-damned trickery.
Your inability to get
beyond "verbatim" is the source of your reading comprehension problems.
Your inability to comprehend verbatim language is what is putting you deeper
in a hole.
My ability to use verbatim language and support myself and to destroy your
lies is what is evident here.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Exactly,
Check.
and the fact that you don't earn wages is what your arguing
against,
Where, liar?
You, god-damned false accuser, are relying on distortion.
Your god-damned opinion is and misinference is NOT my mind or my words.
which is obviously a stupid thing to do when you then admit
that you don't earn wages.
You are the only person in this conversation that is showing yourself to be
wrong.
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
You STILL don't earn wages,
You are bitching about that?
Grow up.
Why don't you ***** at all retirees and everyone else that is on disability
that don't earn wages?
You numbskull.
which was Cracklin's original claim, that
went about arguing over.
Cracklin was spewing *****, acting as if people who do not earn wages are not
good enough.
Why don't you tell her to act better?
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how little
you actually know about tax codes?
I don't disagree that you don't page taxes on wages you don't earn. My
claim has been that you don't earn wages and don't pay wage taxes.
Now, we see you admitting that you don't earn wages and pay wage taxes.
I never said I pay wage taxes on non-wage income.
Why the hell did you go about arguing against that if that's the
truth?
Against what?
Against Cracklin's demeaning attitude toward people who do not pay wage
taxes?
I already told you how to avoid paying wage taxes.
If it upsets you so much do something to avoid being taxed on wages.
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
And, given your stupidity, that's exactly what I would expect your
opinion to be. Keep up the good work Sherlock.
LOL!
You did not deny it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
15 Aug 2005 08:44:49 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124071567.053349.286520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
Show me where I typed that verbatim, *****.
Verbatim? There's your problem dumbshit, you don't have to say it
verbatim to imply and/or infer the meaning.
Wrong, you god-damned false accuser.
You are the god-damned false accuser who is inferring the wrong information
and assuming you can twist my words by doing such god-damned trickery.
Nah, there was another person who read it just as I did.
Your inability to get
beyond "verbatim" is the source of your reading comprehension problems.
Your inability to comprehend verbatim language is what is putting you deeper
in a hole.
If I say, "I don't like vegetables", but a week later said "I like
beans", wouldn't you consider those two statements to be contradictory?
My ability to use verbatim language and support myself and to destroy your
lies is what is evident here.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Exactly,
Check.
and the fact that you don't earn wages is what your arguing
against,
Where, liar?
You, god-damned false accuser, are relying on distortion.
Your god-damned opinion is and misinference is NOT my mind or my words.
I showed you your quotes.
which is obviously a stupid thing to do when you then admit
that you don't earn wages.
You are the only person in this conversation that is showing yourself to be
wrong.
How could that be, when it was you that made the contradictory
statements.
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
You STILL don't earn wages,
You are bitching about that?
Only because you initially denied it.
Grow up.
Why don't you ***** at all retirees and everyone else that is on disability
that don't earn wages?
None of the retirees or people on disability that I know have claimed
to pay wage taxes and then turn around and deny it with the enthusiasm
that you have.
You numbskull.
which was Cracklin's original claim, that
went about arguing over.
Cracklin was spewing *****, acting as if people who do not earn wages are not
good enough.
You argued against her claim that you don't earn wages.
Why don't you tell her to act better?
Why should I? You're the one that's pissed about it, YOU tell her.
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how little
you actually know about tax codes?
I don't disagree that you don't page taxes on wages you don't earn. My
claim has been that you don't earn wages and don't pay wage taxes.
Now, we see you admitting that you don't earn wages and pay wage taxes.
I never said I pay wage taxes on non-wage income.
Yep, you did. I showed the replies where you did so.
Why the hell did you go about arguing against that if that's the
truth?
Against what?
What Cracklin said about you not earning wages.
Against Cracklin's demeaning attitude toward people who do not pay wage
taxes?
Who said anything about her attitude? There you go trying to change
the subject. We're talking about her claim that you don't earn wages.
I already told you how to avoid paying wage taxes.
If it upsets you so much do something to avoid being taxed on wages.
No thanks, I am quite capable of working and have far too much pride to
leech the system like that.
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
And, given your stupidity, that's exactly what I would expect your
opinion to be. Keep up the good work Sherlock.
LOL!
You did not deny it.
No, instead I merely pointed out that your stupidity leads you to have
many opinions about people that aren't based on any facts or reality.
And, as I stated directly above, that's exactly what I expected from
you, nothing but dishonest statements with no facts to back them up.
Keep up the good work Sherlock.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
15 Aug 2005 09:13:04 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124113489.532839.166670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124071567.053349.286520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
Show me where I typed that verbatim, *****.
Verbatim? There's your problem dumbshit, you don't have to say it
verbatim to imply and/or infer the meaning.
Wrong, you god-damned false accuser.
You are the god-damned false accuser who is inferring the wrong
information
and assuming you can twist my words by doing such god-damned trickery.
Nah, there was another person who read it just as I did.
Which means they are misinterpreting the words I wrote, too.
Your inability to get
beyond "verbatim" is the source of your reading comprehension problems.
Your inability to comprehend verbatim language is what is putting you
deeper
in a hole.
If I say, "I don't like vegetables", but a week later said "I like
beans", wouldn't you consider those two statements to be contradictory?
Not what I typed.
My ability to use verbatim language and support myself and to destroy
your
lies is what is evident here.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Exactly,
Check.
and the fact that you don't earn wages is what your arguing
against,
Where, liar?
You, god-damned false accuser, are relying on distortion.
Your god-damned opinion and misinference is NOT my mind or my words.
I showed you your quotes.
Yet, you never understood them verbatim.
which is obviously a stupid thing to do when you then admit
that you don't earn wages.
You are the only person in this conversation that is showing yourself to
be
wrong.
How could that be, when it was you that made the contradictory
statements.
Where are these imaginary contradictory statements you say I wrote?
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
You STILL don't earn wages,
You are bitching about that?
Only because you initially denied it.
Where?
Liar.
Grow up.
Why don't you ***** at all retirees and everyone else that is on
disability
that don't earn wages?
None of the retirees or people on disability that I know have claimed
to pay wage taxes and then turn around and deny it with the enthusiasm
that you have.
I typed I did pay taxes on wages, fool.
You numbskull.
which was Cracklin's original claim, that
went about arguing over.
Cracklin was spewing *****, acting as if people who do not earn wages are
not
good enough.
You argued against her claim that you don't earn wages.
Where?
Why don't you tell her to act better?
Why should I? You're the one that's pissed about it, YOU tell her.
I am pissed about it?
You are lying about me.
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how
little
you actually know about tax codes?
I don't disagree that you don't page taxes on wages you don't earn. My
claim has been that you don't earn wages and don't pay wage taxes.
Now, we see you admitting that you don't earn wages and pay wage taxes.
I never said I pay wage taxes on non-wage income.
Yep, you did.
Too bad you can not produce a quote where I said I did.
Why don't you give up, *****?
Show me the verbatim quotes where I said what you say I said, verbatim, or
shut your stupid, dishonest mouth.
I showed the replies where you did so.
You never showed any proof of your contentions against me.
Why the hell did you go about arguing against that if that's the
truth?
Against what?
What Cracklin said about you not earning wages.
Where is the quote, *****?
Against Cracklin's demeaning attitude toward people who do not pay wage
taxes?
Who said anything about her attitude?
Me.
There you go trying to change
the subject.
Not really.
You think you can control me?
You are wrong.
We're talking about her claim that you don't earn wages.
What about it?
I already told you how to avoid paying wage taxes.
If it upsets you so much do something to avoid being taxed on wages.
No thanks, I am quite capable of working and have far too much pride to
leech the system like that.
I am on disability. The SSA does not put people on disability that are not
disabled.
Check the codes again, buffoon, and see where I am not required to earn
wages.
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
And, given your stupidity, that's exactly what I would expect your
opinion to be. Keep up the good work Sherlock.
LOL!
You did not deny it.
No,
Wrong.
instead I merely pointed out that your stupidity leads you to have
many opinions about people that aren't based on any facts or reality.
It is your stupidity that is showing.
And, as I stated directly above, that's exactly what I expected from
you, nothing but dishonest statements with no facts to back them up.
Keep up the good work Sherlock.
I told you it was my opinion, *****.
Now you are acting as if I said it was a fact.
More erroneous rebuttals from you earns you less credibility.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: 101 Rules of Engagement: American Women Paving The Way To Hell: |
15 Aug 2005 09:36:35 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124113489.532839.166670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124071567.053349.286520@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
Show me where I typed that verbatim, *****.
Verbatim? There's your problem dumbshit, you don't have to say it
verbatim to imply and/or infer the meaning.
Wrong, you god-damned false accuser.
You are the god-damned false accuser who is inferring the wrong
information
and assuming you can twist my words by doing such god-damned trickery.
Nah, there was another person who read it just as I did.
Which means they are misinterpreting the words I wrote, too.
What are the chances? </sarcasm>
Your inability to get
beyond "verbatim" is the source of your reading comprehension problems.
Your inability to comprehend verbatim language is what is putting you
deeper
in a hole.
If I say, "I don't like vegetables", but a week later said "I like
beans", wouldn't you consider those two statements to be contradictory?
Not what I typed.
Just answer the question, are those two statements contradictory?
My ability to use verbatim language and support myself and to destroy
your
lies is what is evident here.
The tax code does not require taxes to be paid on non-existent wages.
Exactly,
Check.
and the fact that you don't earn wages is what your arguing
against,
Where, liar?
You, god-damned false accuser, are relying on distortion.
Your god-damned opinion and misinference is NOT my mind or my words.
I showed you your quotes.
Yet, you never understood them verbatim.
Quit with the verbatim *****. Language doesn't work that way, and only
an idiot would think so.
which is obviously a stupid thing to do when you then admit
that you don't earn wages.
You are the only person in this conversation that is showing yourself to
be
wrong.
How could that be, when it was you that made the contradictory
statements.
Where are these imaginary contradictory statements you say I wrote?
I already provided in an earlier reply. Look them up.
Deal
with it.
I did, and I still observe and obey the tax codes.
You STILL don't earn wages,
You are bitching about that?
Only because you initially denied it.
Where?
I already provided the quote in an earlier post, look it up.
Liar.
Grow up.
Why don't you ***** at all retirees and everyone else that is on
disability
that don't earn wages?
None of the retirees or people on disability that I know have claimed
to pay wage taxes and then turn around and deny it with the enthusiasm
that you have.
I typed I did pay taxes on wages, fool.
Nope. And, more than once person says you didn't.
You numbskull.
which was Cracklin's original claim, that
went about arguing over.
Cracklin was spewing *****, acting as if people who do not earn wages are
not
good enough.
You argued against her claim that you don't earn wages.
Where?
Already shown in an earlier post, look it up.
Why don't you tell her to act better?
Why should I? You're the one that's pissed about it, YOU tell her.
I am pissed about it?
You sure act like it.
You are lying about me.
No, it's an observation based on your behavior.
Any more ignorant statements you want to make to show everyone how
little
you actually know about tax codes?
I don't disagree that you don't page taxes on wages you don't earn. My
claim has been that you don't earn wages and don't pay wage taxes.
Now, we see you admitting that you don't earn wages and pay wage taxes.
I never said I pay wage taxes on non-wage income.
Yep, you did.
Too bad you can not produce a quote where I said I did.
Already provided.
Why don't you give up, *****?
Why don't you quit backpedaling?
Show me the verbatim quotes where I said what you say I said, verbatim, or
shut your stupid, dishonest mouth.
The enlgish language doesn't work "verbatim", *****. You should have
learned that in your early years in elementary school.
I showed the replies where you did so.
You never showed any proof of your contentions against me.
Yep, I did.
Why the hell did you go about arguing against that if that's the
truth?
Against what?
What Cracklin said about you not earning wages.
Where is the quote, *****?
Already provided in an earlier posting where you asked me to do so. Go
look it up.
Against Cracklin's demeaning attitude toward people who do not pay wage
taxes?
Who said anything about her attitude?
Me.
Only to try and change the subject. Quit with the diversionary
tactics.
There you go trying to change
the subject.
Not really.
You think you can control me?
You are wrong.
LOL!!! Only Johnny would twist this around into more "Johnny
*****(tm)".
We're talking about her claim that you don't earn wages.
What about it?
LOL!!! I guess you forgot what this discussion is about already. Big
surprise.
I already told you how to avoid paying wage taxes.
If it upsets you so much do something to avoid being taxed on wages.
No thanks, I am quite capable of working and have far too much pride to
leech the system like that.
I am on disability. The SSA does not put people on disability that are not
disabled.
*****. There are documented cases of people who have abused that
system. Why do you think they hire PI's to follow certian people
around?
Check the codes again, buffoon, and see where I am not required to earn
wages.
Who said you are "required to earn wages"? Show me a VERBATIM quote.
LOL!
My opinion of you now is that you have or had unpaid IRS tax bills.
And, given your stupidity, that's exactly what I would expect your
opinion to be. Keep up the good work Sherlock.
LOL!
You did not deny it.
No,
Wrong.
instead I merely pointed out that your stupidity leads you to have
many opinions about people that aren't based on any facts or reality.
It is your stupidity that is showing.
By forming opinions based on a lie? LOL! Sorry, that's you.
And, as I stated directly above, that's exactly what I expected from
you, nothing but dishonest statements with no facts to back them up.
Keep up the good work Sherlock.
I told you it was my opinion, *****.
Did I argue it wasn't? Show me a VERBATIM quote where I did.
Now you are acting as if I said it was a fact.
No, you act as if it was a fact. You'r | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
