| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Rev. Donald Spitz" |
| Date: |
27 Aug 2005 11:51:39 AM |
| Object: |
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
Watch `The Silent Scream'The news media are reporting that researchers =
at the University of California-San Francisco are saying they found =
unborn babies likely do not feel pain until the final months of =
pregnancy. We challenge these finding by inviting journalists and the =
researchers to watch the world renowned film The Silent Scream online =
which shows a 12-week-old baby in the womb screaming while being torn to =
pieces by an abortionist.=20
See Abortion Videos Online
AbortionTV
a.. The Silent Scream
a.. Hard Truth
a.. The Massacre of Innocence
Posted by Editor at August 24, 2005 09:45 AM=20
a..=20
In His Majesty's Service,
Danny D. Bunn, B.A.
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "...Ye must be born again."
http://www.ekkcom.com
--=20
=20
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell =
because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins =
and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and =
take away my sins and give me eternal life. http://www.ArmyofGod.com
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<H3 class=3Dtitle><A =
href=3D"http://www.silentscream.org/video1.htm"><B><FONT=20
color=3D#000000>12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!</FONT></B></A></H3><B>Watch =
`The Silent=20
Scream'</B>The news media are reporting that researchers at the =
University of=20
California-San Francisco are saying they found unborn babies likely do =
not feel=20
pain until the final months of pregnancy. We challenge these finding by =
inviting=20
journalists and the researchers to watch the world renowned film <I>The =
Silent=20
Scream</I> online which shows a 12-week-old baby in the womb screaming =
while=20
being torn to pieces by an abortionist.=20
<P><A href=3D"http://www.abortiontv.com/Movies/viewliveabortions.htm"=20
target=3D_blank><FONT color=3D#007700>See Abortion Videos=20
Online</FONT></A><BR><I>AbortionTV</I><BR>
<LI>The Silent Scream<BR>
<LI>Hard Truth<BR>
<LI>The Massacre of Innocence<BR><BR><A name=3Dmore></A><SPAN =
class=3Dposted><FONT=20
size=3D1>Posted by Editor at August 24, 2005 09:45 AM </FONT></SPAN>
<LI><SPAN class=3Dposted><FONT size=3D1></FONT></SPAN></FONT></LI></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In His Majesty's Service,<BR>Danny D. =
Bunn,=20
B.A.<BR>The Lord Jesus Christ said, "...Ye must be born again."<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.ekkcom.com">http://www.ekkcom.com</A></FONT></DIV></FO=
NT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR>-- <BR> <BR>SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear =
Jesus, I am a=20
sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you =
died on=20
the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask =
you now to=20
come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. <A=20
href=3D"http://www.ArmyofGod.com">http://www.ArmyofGod.com</A>=20
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60--
.
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 01:47:03 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1125423970.542197.238560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and
I are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards
is that a "yes" or a "no?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:34:57 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns96C29666D1D57keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>, james g.
keegan jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1125423970.542197.238560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and
I are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards
is that a "yes" or a "no?"
I think that is "No."
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
31 Aug 2005 08:23:59 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in news:300820051934579002%
dbarnes@aol.com:
In article <Xns96C29666D1D57keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>, james g.
keegan jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1125423970.542197.238560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
David W. Barnes wrote:
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and
I are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards
is that a "yes" or a "no?"
I think that is "No."
it's tough to get coward bobby to deal with some of his more despicable
lies when he hasn't even b egun to deal with his relatively minor lies
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:34:56 PM |
|
|
In article <1125423970.542197.238560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey
(lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre.
He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat
except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording."
The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman of
the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also
served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions, U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No - we'll deal with it now... You don't make the rules. You
"challenged" me. Great. Start with your accusations that Patrick and
I are convicted felons. And that I have to stay away from children as
a condition of my parole. And how I had to wear a leg shackle. And
how I work at Home Depot as a stock boy. Offer verifiable proof.
You are the big talker. You "challenged" me for a Moot Court.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 12:59:30 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording." The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman of the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions, U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No you won't. You never deal with your own filth.
Now, your claims.
Q.E.D.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 01:44:31 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording." The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman of the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions, U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No you won't. You never deal with your own filth.
He has my statement recorded in the post. I am fully prepared to defend
myself on that.
a) I did say that David Barnes committed a crime and I did provide
court documents to support that.
The David Barnes that posts in this newsgroup claimed his real name is
not David Barnes.
I never said that the David Barnes I claimed committed the crimes, in
which I also provided court documents, was the same David Barnes that
posts in this newsgroup.
Both of those kill Barne's argument. I didn't claim "he" committed any
crime or is a convicted felon. I only said that a David Barnes is.
The same goes for Patrick L. Humphrey.
His argument would be killed in less than 3 post.
Now, we must get on to Barnes claims. I will ask you a question at the
end, which you will avoid to answer directly.
First the myths (lies) then the facts
Myth
Barnes claims I applied for a Law Enforcement position with a Sheriff's
department.
Fact: I have never applied for ANY law enforcement position other than
with the DOC, which I was accepted for without any problem.
Myth:
Barnes claimes I was forced out of the Air Force
Fact: I wasn't. I volunteered to leave during the downsizing. Fact is,
I was actually asked by my squadron commander to stay; however, due to
family hardship at that time I elected to leave in order to fullfill my
responsibility with my children. Not that it is any of your business.
Myth:
Barnes claims that my disability is based upon a hearing loss and it is
not a valid claim.
Fact: My disability is not based on hearing loss, it is based on lung
damage aquired to body recovery during the Gander Air Crash.
Myth: Barnes claims I was dishonorably discharged
Fact: I was honorably discharged
Myth: Barnes claimes I was disciplined in the Air Force
Fact: I was never disciplined
The list goes on; however, Barnes is making the claims so therefore the
burden of proof lies entirely upon him.
Now, my questions to you or anyone else.
1) Have you EVER seen Barnes support his claims about me?
2) Do you believe claimes without supporting evidence?
3) Do you believe Barnes claims?
Now, your claims.
Q.E.D.
So you admit to being afraid to challenge Barnes to back up his claims?
You admit to wanting to hide your head in the sand and not see that
Barnes is lying? You admit to aiding and supporting a liar, which is
Barnes?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:34:57 PM |
|
|
In article <1125427471.382938.152300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in
message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey
(lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat
theatre. He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat
except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording
it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording."
The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially
during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month
five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman
of the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good
conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also
served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more
training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions,
U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was
on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are
no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No you won't. You never deal with your own filth.
He has my statement recorded in the post. I am fully prepared to defend
myself on that.
a) I did say that David Barnes committed a crime and I did provide
court documents to support that.
The David Barnes that posts in this newsgroup claimed his real name is
not David Barnes.
I never said that the David Barnes I claimed committed the crimes, in
which I also provided court documents, was the same David Barnes that
posts in this newsgroup.
Liar. You said I had to wear a leg shackle. That as a condition of my
parole I have to stay away from children and stop using computers.
Come on *****. This may work in the guard world but this is "Moot
Court," remember?
Both of those kill Barne's argument. I didn't claim "he" committed any
crime or is a convicted felon. I only said that a David Barnes is.
Liar. You are pathetic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:38:19 PM |
|
|
In article <1125427471.382938.152300@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c>
wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in
message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey
(lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat
theatre. He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat
except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording
it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording."
The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially
during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month
five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman
of the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good
conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also
served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more
training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions,
U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was
on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are
no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No you won't. You never deal with your own filth.
He has my statement recorded in the post. I am fully prepared to defend
myself on that.
a) I did say that David Barnes committed a crime and I did provide
court documents to support that.
The leg shackle.
The parole officer you spoke with.
Come on, *****! You have to go first!
Now, your claims.
Q.E.D.
So you admit to being afraid to challenge Barnes to back up his claims?
You admit to wanting to hide your head in the sand and not see that
Barnes is lying? You admit to aiding and supporting a liar, which is
Barnes?
Is this your idea of proof?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:05:51 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
We will deal with that afterwards, that's easy to beat.
No you won't. You never deal with your own filth.
He has my statement recorded in the post. I am fully prepared to defend
myself on that.
a) I did say that David Barnes committed a crime and I did provide
court documents to support that.
Documents which show you to be a sleazy liar.
Once again you do nothing but make excuses. You justify your lies
rather than dealing with them.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: David Barnes challenged |
30 Aug 2005 09:34:56 PM |
|
|
In article <300820050756374881%dbarnes@aol.com>, David W. Barnes
<dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
In article <1125413152.230709.176560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1125411860.358713.165440@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:48:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey
(lying
about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he
wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He
was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except
on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error...
...and then follow it up with a lame excuse, like "bad wording." The
fact is...is that you lied about what you did in the military.
I served in the 463 OMS
I served as a crew chief
I was on mobility, which is activated occasionally, especially during
war time.
I left as a Staff Sgt.
"Left" He means he was told he was un-needed. And an E5 after that
amount of time is hardly impressive.
I supervised more than 100 different people
*****
When we used to have APR's I had firewall nines
As did nearly everyone. APR's were a joke.
With the EPR I had fives
Another Joke.
I have several awards and decorations, inluding Crew of the month five
times, Crew of the Quarter twice, Crew of the Year twice, Airman of the
month six times and DCC Airman of the Quarter one time.
Ooooooh. Airman of the month? Note he didn't mention the good conduct
medal.
If you had read my DD214, it was on there. Obviously you didn't read
it, as well as the two Achievement Medals and two Accommodation medals,
and a list of others.
The one you admit modifying.
That is because he was disciplined.
I have a challenge for you.
I want to have a mock court set up in this newsgroup and your claims
brought forth. I want to challenge you to prove each claim with actual
evidence. Evidence that can be verified by anyone in the newsgroup.
Do you accept?
Who is the judge and jury, Mary?
I served with OMS both as crew chief and specialist with Aircraft
Maintenance Equipment. I also served with EMS as a NCOIC. I also served
as a Dorm Manager for a brief period until I had recieved my seven
level, at which time I was placed back on the line for more training.
I served on many special missions, including airdrop missions, U.S.S.
Iowa, Gander Air Crash, Libya, Panama, Honduras, Desert Storm.
I was a MEGP
I served during Desert Storm where I was activated, because I was on
mobility. I flew on many support missions as a MEGP.
Now, where is the lie?
You were drummed out...
Read my challenge above
You have proven many times in the past you "split hairs." There are no
doubt many lies here. For example, "brief period" could mean twenty
minutes to you.
Go away, Mary.
My challenge...yes or no?
Sure - no problem. Lets start with your accusations that Patrick and I
are convicted felons. Yes or No?
Is that crickets I hear?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 10:58:46 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 07:24:20 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
Now, where is the lie?
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 12:47:15 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error, and I did.
In fact you contiue to insist that you did not lie. That's not
admitting an error. That's trying to excuse it.
Your whine is as credible as a murderer trying to excuse his crime by
saying he didn't commit murder - he just made a poor choice of
actions.
It isn't a lie unless
it is intentional.
Oh look, the little baby is whining that he's not responsible for his
actions.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 01:17:03 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error, and I did.
In fact you contiue to insist that you did not lie. That's not
admitting an error. That's trying to excuse it.
Your whine is as credible as a murderer trying to excuse his crime by
saying he didn't commit murder - he just made a poor choice of
actions.
It isn't a lie unless
it is intentional.
Oh look, the little baby is whining that he's not responsible for his
actions.
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake in my
choice of words, which I did. You don't know the meaning of
responsibility.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 02:04:42 PM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he wouldn't do
any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He was
in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except on
CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error, and I did.
In fact you contiue to insist that you did not lie. That's not
admitting an error. That's trying to excuse it.
Your whine is as credible as a murderer trying to excuse his crime by
saying he didn't commit murder - he just made a poor choice of
actions.
It isn't a lie unless
it is intentional.
Oh look, the little baby is whining that he's not responsible for his
actions.
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
....and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 08:44:34 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he wouldn't
do any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He
was in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except
on CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error, and I did.
In fact you contiue to insist that you did not lie. That's not
admitting an error. That's trying to excuse it.
Your whine is as credible as a murderer trying to excuse his crime by
saying he didn't commit murder - he just made a poor choice of
actions.
It isn't a lie unless it is intentional.
Oh look, the little baby is whining that he's not responsible for his
actions.
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
....and a bad one, to boot.
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
31 Aug 2005 07:09:49 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 21:12:54 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Adam H. wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:45:07 -0500, "Cracklin'" <c@c.c> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96C0B8271CFAEkeegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
=========================
I'm just curious - how do you know he was lying?
Because he later let slip (I won't say "admitted" since he wouldn't
do any such thing) that he was never posted to a combat theatre. He
was in the military during Desert Storm, but never saw combat except
on CNN.
He asked you "how do you know he was lying"?
Because in your ***** way, you admitted to it..."by wording it"
improperly.
Unlike you, I can admit to an error, and I did.
In fact you contiue to insist that you did not lie. That's not
admitting an error. That's trying to excuse it.
Your whine is as credible as a murderer trying to excuse his crime by
saying he didn't commit murder - he just made a poor choice of
actions.
It isn't a lie unless it is intentional.
Oh look, the little baby is whining that he's not responsible for his
actions.
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
31 Aug 2005 11:06:42 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 07:07:53 AM |
|
|
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
03 Sep 2005 10:52:45 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Up to 29, but we'll hash that in e-mail.
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Torontans in Boston? What's the world coming to? ;-)
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Just let the in-laws know that their Marlies will be visiting Houston in
January (after being visited by our guys the Saturday before American
Thanksgiving), and it'll work out. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
04 Sep 2005 05:44:47 AM |
|
|
On 03 Sep 2005 22:52:45 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Up to 29, but we'll hash that in e-mail.
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Torontans in Boston? What's the world coming to? ;-)
Now I see where osprey got confused.
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Just let the in-laws know that their Marlies will be visiting Houston in
January (after being visited by our guys the Saturday before American
Thanksgiving), and it'll work out. ;-)
;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 08:55:42 AM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Trying to "validate" yourself? Who really cares about your
"brother-in-law", who are you trying to impress? If you wish to talk
about your family, and I seriously doubt anyone in here cares about
your family...god forbid they be like you..send an e-mail to patrick.
You seriously have a problem using a newsgroup to talk about personal
issues with others..it's a sick attempt to gain attention.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
03 Sep 2005 11:09:46 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Louise Mallard wrote:
[...]
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Trying to "validate" yourself? Who really cares about your
"brother-in-law", who are you trying to impress? If you wish to talk
about your family, and I seriously doubt anyone in here cares about
your family...god forbid they be like you..send an e-mail to patrick.
Question, prison babysitter: is anyone forcing you to read anything she
posts?
You seriously have a problem using a newsgroup to talk about personal
issues with others..it's a sick attempt to gain attention.
I suggest you get around to learning how to fix your news agent so you can
ignore anyone you want to. As long as you've been around Usenet, there's no
excuse for your overlooking that knowledge.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 11:57:06 AM |
|
|
On 1 Sep 2005 06:55:42 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Trying to "validate" yourself?
No--I am speaking to my friend, not to a newsgroup adversary I am
trying to impress--because you're not worth impressing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 12:06:50 PM |
|
|
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:ulceh1p91se6nc9ce7surieis4rn9pro4c@4ax.com...
On 1 Sep 2005 06:55:42 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for
himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Trying to "validate" yourself?
No--I am speaking to my friend, not to a newsgroup adversary I am
trying to impress--because you're not worth impressing.
You are trying to validate yourself, get the hint...no one really cares
about your little family in South Africa. Who are you trying to impress? Go
look for that friend you claimed is missing instead of trying to impress
people you don't know in a newsgroup. You get more pathetic by the day.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 06:07:08 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:H9adnbu4pLBPqYreRVn-rg@comcast.com:
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:ulceh1p91se6nc9ce7surieis4rn9pro4c@4ax.com...
No--I am speaking to my friend, not to a newsgroup adversary I am
trying to impress--because you're not worth impressing.
You are trying to validate yourself, get the hint...no one really
cares about your little family in South Africa.
coward bobby, even when you are blatantly projecting, your words carry the
stench of your smallminded dishonesty.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 12:23:16 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:06:50 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:ulceh1p91se6nc9ce7surieis4rn9pro4c@4ax.com...
On 1 Sep 2005 06:55:42 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for
himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are naturliazed Torntorians (and who are making the long
drive from Tornto), are coming to Boston, tomorrow! Woo-Hoo!
Unfortunately, none of my hockey-playing nephews will be coming in,
though one of my nephews received a hockey Scholarship to a University
in New York (details will be kept concealed in Usenet).
Trying to "validate" yourself?
No--I am speaking to my friend, not to a newsgroup adversary I am
trying to impress--because you're not worth impressing.
You are trying to validate yourself...
No--I was speaking to my friend, not to a newsgroup adversary I am
trying to impress to get back at my other enemies. You're not worth
impressing!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 12:20:21 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:ulceh1p91se6nc9ce7surieis4rn9pro4c@4ax.com...
On 1 Sep 2005 06:55:42 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 31 Aug 2005 23:06:42 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 20:44:34 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 30 Aug 2005 11:17:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
[...]
If I wasn't responsible I wouldn't have admitted to a mistake...
...and then excused it with a lame-***** reason.
That's been his SOP as long as I've seen him in here.
I know. :-(
Hey, you're an irresponsible crossdresser.
...and a bad one, to boot.
I have a few, nifty art software tricks I could use to...on second
thought...blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
The neighbors appreciate your decision.
;-)
(19 hits at the page, one of which was mine. Spud's popular. :-)
I hit about three times, I think, trying to access the Spud page.
It's up to 21 by now...and he still can't grow a spine and see for
himself
what his assumptions have gotten him.
;-)
Oh, guess what! Exciting news! My South African Brother-in-Law and
his wife, who are natu | | | | | | | | | | | |
