| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Rev. Donald Spitz" |
| Date: |
27 Aug 2005 11:51:39 AM |
| Object: |
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
Watch `The Silent Scream'The news media are reporting that researchers =
at the University of California-San Francisco are saying they found =
unborn babies likely do not feel pain until the final months of =
pregnancy. We challenge these finding by inviting journalists and the =
researchers to watch the world renowned film The Silent Scream online =
which shows a 12-week-old baby in the womb screaming while being torn to =
pieces by an abortionist.=20
See Abortion Videos Online
AbortionTV
a.. The Silent Scream
a.. Hard Truth
a.. The Massacre of Innocence
Posted by Editor at August 24, 2005 09:45 AM=20
a..=20
In His Majesty's Service,
Danny D. Bunn, B.A.
The Lord Jesus Christ said, "...Ye must be born again."
http://www.ekkcom.com
--=20
=20
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell =
because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins =
and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and =
take away my sins and give me eternal life. http://www.ArmyofGod.com
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<H3 class=3Dtitle><A =
href=3D"http://www.silentscream.org/video1.htm"><B><FONT=20
color=3D#000000>12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!</FONT></B></A></H3><B>Watch =
`The Silent=20
Scream'</B>The news media are reporting that researchers at the =
University of=20
California-San Francisco are saying they found unborn babies likely do =
not feel=20
pain until the final months of pregnancy. We challenge these finding by =
inviting=20
journalists and the researchers to watch the world renowned film <I>The =
Silent=20
Scream</I> online which shows a 12-week-old baby in the womb screaming =
while=20
being torn to pieces by an abortionist.=20
<P><A href=3D"http://www.abortiontv.com/Movies/viewliveabortions.htm"=20
target=3D_blank><FONT color=3D#007700>See Abortion Videos=20
Online</FONT></A><BR><I>AbortionTV</I><BR>
<LI>The Silent Scream<BR>
<LI>Hard Truth<BR>
<LI>The Massacre of Innocence<BR><BR><A name=3Dmore></A><SPAN =
class=3Dposted><FONT=20
size=3D1>Posted by Editor at August 24, 2005 09:45 AM </FONT></SPAN>
<LI><SPAN class=3Dposted><FONT size=3D1></FONT></SPAN></FONT></LI></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In His Majesty's Service,<BR>Danny D. =
Bunn,=20
B.A.<BR>The Lord Jesus Christ said, "...Ye must be born again."<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.ekkcom.com">http://www.ekkcom.com</A></FONT></DIV></FO=
NT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR>-- <BR> <BR>SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear =
Jesus, I am a=20
sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you =
died on=20
the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask =
you now to=20
come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. <A=20
href=3D"http://www.ArmyofGod.com">http://www.ArmyofGod.com</A>=20
</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C5AB06.113DBF60--
.
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 03:34:48 AM |
|
|
On 29 Aug 2005 12:38:38 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
Says the one who needs to make himself feel better by making fun of
people's personal looks.
You've supported the assholes who've come in here infrequently and
ranked on Patrick's wife--who the ***** are you kidding?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 08:46:00 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 29 Aug 2005 12:38:38 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
<clip>
Says the one who needs to make himself feel better by making fun of
people's personal looks.
You've supported the assholes who've come in here infrequently and
ranked on Patrick's wife--who the ***** are you kidding?
I'm assuming you mean, besides himself.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
28 Aug 2005 08:28:55 AM |
|
|
On 27 Aug 2005 12:16:33 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Rev. Donald Spitz" <Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> writes:
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
Watch `The Silent Scream'The news media are reporting that researchers at the
University of California-San Francisco are saying they found unborn babies
likely do not feel pain until the final months of pregnancy. We challenge
these finding by inviting journalists and the researchers to watch the world
renowned film The Silent Scream online which shows a 12-week-old baby in the
womb screaming while being torn to pieces by an abortionist.
A fetus can breathe at twelve weeks? You really need to put the crack pipe
down, Fake Reverend...
WTF?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
28 Aug 2005 02:52:46 PM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 27 Aug 2005 12:16:33 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Rev. Donald Spitz" <Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> writes:
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
Watch `The Silent Scream'The news media are reporting that researchers at
the University of California-San Francisco are saying they found unborn
babies likely do not feel pain until the final months of pregnancy. We
challenge these finding by inviting journalists and the researchers to
watch the world renowned film The Silent Scream online which shows a
12-week-old baby in the womb screaming while being torn to pieces by an
abortionist.
A fetus can breathe at twelve weeks? You really need to put the crack pipe
down, Fake Reverend...
WTF?
That's a common reaction to anything the Fake Reverend posts.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mark" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
27 Aug 2005 04:27:14 PM |
|
|
In article <qS0Qe.2434$8q.622@lakeread01>,
"Rev. Donald Spitz" <Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com> wrote:
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
must have realized it was gonna be born into "bush's" world....
--
mark
markjs1@*nospam*yahoo.com
"Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite."
-John Kenneth Galbraith
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 02:26:55 PM |
|
|
Rev. Donald Spitz wrote:
12-Week-Old Fetus Screams!
Watch `The Silent Scream'The news media are reporting that researchers
at the University of California-San Francisco are saying they found unborn
babies likely do not feel pain until the final months of pregnancy. We
challenge these finding by inviting journalists and the researchers to
watch the world renowned film The Silent Scream online which shows
a 12-week-old baby in the womb screaming while being torn to pieces
by an abortionist.
More bloviation from a crazed shitbag who's been buggering Jesus on the
cross for years.
In "The Silent Scream", right-to-liar Bernard Nathanson says, "There is
no question this child senses aggression." Nathanson then freezes the
stop-action image, revealing the child's tiny mouth opened wide in what
Nathanson's calls "the silent scream."
Have you ever noticed that when you sit in the bath tub, and push your
hand towards a floating object (like a rubber duck) that the floating
object moves away from you? Do you think this is because the rubber
duck "senses aggression" and wildly attempts to escape your hand? Or
is this simply a matter of fluid dynamics?
"Silent Scream" is irrefutable evidence that Bernard Nathanson does not
believe that abortion is murder. How could he participate in the
making of a film where the murder of an unborn person is committed, as
he states in his narration?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 05:31:17 AM |
|
|
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West. Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body, let alone inside), and that with the
progress of science we are close to a time when it will be legal to
abort children at an age when they could be medically saved. I cant see
how any moral system can justify this.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 11:07:00 AM |
|
|
"the Good Captain" <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1125311477.239856.60990@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West.
what exactly?
Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body,
really now?
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 07:31:05 AM |
|
|
On 29 Aug 2005 03:31:17 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125311477.239856.60990@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West.
Nonsense. It is a simple and safe medical procedure.
Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body, let alone inside),
Nonsense. Most abortions are done long before there is much
development at all.
and that with the
progress of science we are close to a time when it will be legal to
abort children at an age when they could be medically saved.
Irrelevant. Whether a fetus can or cannot be medically saved is not a
factor in allowing a woman to get an abortion if that is her choice.
Nor should it be.
I cant see
how any moral system can justify this.
Almost everybody who refers to "moral"
means "what I think that you should do".
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 09:03:36 AM |
|
|
Attila wrote:-
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West.
Nonsense. It is a simple and safe medical procedure.
Safe to whom?
Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body, let alone inside),
Nonsense. Most abortions are done long before there is much
development at all.
The brain and nervous system are functioning at about 8 weeks. The is
the key stage at which the child is defined as a foetus as opposed to
an 'embryo'. After this the foetus is able to feel pain.
"The structures needed to sense and feel pain are present and working
in the unborn child before 10 weeks gestation" - Foetal Sentience,
Peter McCullagh MD DPhil MRCP.
"Sensory and motor nerves start to work at eight weeks, when the
nervous system is already extensive. The movements of unborn children
at this stage are not all random but can be in response to stimuli.
Nerves, which carry sensation from the skin to the spinal cord, develop
by six or seven weeks" - Some observations on early human foetal
movements, J E Fitzgerald and W F Windle, Journal of Comparative
Neurology 1942 - 76, pages 159 to 167
According to the DoH's statistics for 2004, 60% of abortions take place
at 10 weeks or less. However, they fail to clarify figures before and
after the 8 week point.
"At 11 weeks the child moves around freely and is growing very fast.
The foetus is now bigger than the placenta, and the sac around the baby
fills with fluid to allow the growing baby to move around and exercise.
He or she can now respond to light, noise and pressure. He or she can
produce complex facial expressions and even smile..." (H B Valman and J
F Pearson, "What the foetus feels", British Medical Journal, 26 January
1980).
80% of neurologists who responded to a Daily Telegraph survey said that
unborn babies should be given pain relief during abortions from the
11th week of pregnancy - Daily Telegraph, 11 October 2000
28% of abortions are carried out at between 10 - 13 weeks gestation,
leaving 12% that are carried out at between 13 - 24 weeks
(unquantified).
"By 14 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in
all parts of the body (except in the skin on the back of the head)" -
V. Collins, S. Zielinski and T. Marzen, "Fetal Pain and Abortion: the
Medical Evidence", Studies in Law and Medicine, No 18, 1984. V.
Collins is Professor of Anaesthesiology at the University of Illinois.
Babies born at 23 weeks have a 17 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 24 weeks have a 39 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 25 weeks have a 50 per cent chance of survival
Twenty years ago, approx 20% of babies weighing less than 1,000gms (2lb
2oz) at birth survived. Nowadays, about 80% survive. (www.bliss.org.uk)
and that with the
progress of science we are close to a time when it will be legal to
abort children at an age when they could be medically saved.
Irrelevant. Whether a fetus can or cannot be medically saved is not a
factor in allowing a woman to get an abortion if that is her choice.
Nor should it be.
If you can describe the capacity of an unborn child to survive outside
the womb, let alone feel pain, as irrelevant to whether his/her life
should be legally terminated, you are effectively a bigot on this issue
and your views are of limited value. I quote the above for the
consideration of those reading who havent closed their minds on this
issue.
I cant see
how any moral system can justify this.
Almost everybody who refers to "moral"
means "what I think that you should do".
Quite right. And people who shy away from the word know they hold views
that they cant actually justify.
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 09:34:20 PM |
|
|
"the Good Captain" <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1125324216.704840.296030@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Attila wrote:-
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West.
Nonsense. It is a simple and safe medical procedure.
Safe to whom?
Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body, let alone inside),
Nonsense. Most abortions are done long before there is much
development at all.
The brain and nervous system are functioning at about 8 weeks.
Only as a paramecium might.. Try six months.
The is
the key stage at which the child is defined as a foetus as opposed to
an 'embryo'. After this the foetus is able to feel pain.
"The structures needed to sense and feel pain are present and working
in the unborn child before 10 weeks gestation" - Foetal Sentience,
Peter McCullagh MD DPhil MRCP.
"Sensory and motor nerves start to work at eight weeks, when the
nervous system is already extensive. The movements of unborn children
at this stage are not all random but can be in response to stimuli.
Nerves, which carry sensation from the skin to the spinal cord, develop
by six or seven weeks" - Some observations on early human foetal
movements, J E Fitzgerald and W F Windle, Journal of Comparative
Neurology 1942 - 76, pages 159 to 167
According to the DoH's statistics for 2004, 60% of abortions take place
at 10 weeks or less. However, they fail to clarify figures before and
after the 8 week point.
"At 11 weeks the child moves around freely and is growing very fast.
The foetus is now bigger than the placenta, and the sac around the baby
fills with fluid to allow the growing baby to move around and exercise.
He or she can now respond to light, noise and pressure. He or she can
produce complex facial expressions and even smile..." (H B Valman and J
F Pearson, "What the foetus feels", British Medical Journal, 26 January
1980).
80% of neurologists who responded to a Daily Telegraph survey said that
unborn babies should be given pain relief during abortions from the
11th week of pregnancy - Daily Telegraph, 11 October 2000
28% of abortions are carried out at between 10 - 13 weeks gestation,
leaving 12% that are carried out at between 13 - 24 weeks
(unquantified).
"By 14 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in
all parts of the body (except in the skin on the back of the head)" -
V. Collins, S. Zielinski and T. Marzen, "Fetal Pain and Abortion: the
Medical Evidence", Studies in Law and Medicine, No 18, 1984. V.
Collins is Professor of Anaesthesiology at the University of Illinois.
Babies born at 23 weeks have a 17 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 24 weeks have a 39 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 25 weeks have a 50 per cent chance of survival
Twenty years ago, approx 20% of babies weighing less than 1,000gms (2lb
2oz) at birth survived. Nowadays, about 80% survive. (www.bliss.org.uk)
and that with the
progress of science we are close to a time when it will be legal to
abort children at an age when they could be medically saved.
Irrelevant. Whether a fetus can or cannot be medically saved is not a
factor in allowing a woman to get an abortion if that is her choice.
Nor should it be.
If you can describe the capacity of an unborn child to survive outside
the womb, let alone feel pain, as irrelevant to whether his/her life
should be legally terminated, you are effectively a bigot on this issue
and your views are of limited value. I quote the above for the
consideration of those reading who havent closed their minds on this
issue.
I cant see
how any moral system can justify this.
Almost everybody who refers to "moral"
means "what I think that you should do".
Quite right. And people who shy away from the word know they hold views
that they cant actually justify.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 12:31:21 PM |
|
|
On 29 Aug 2005 07:03:36 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125324216.704840.296030@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:-
With or without a Christian perspective, there is something
fundamentally (no pun intended) wrong with a society that permits
abortion on the scale that is done in the West.
Nonsense. It is a simple and safe medical procedure.
Safe to whom?
The only person involved - the pregnant woman.
Especially given that
often an aborted foetus will often show signs of consciousness (such as
screaming when outside the body, let alone inside),
Nonsense. Most abortions are done long before there is much
development at all.
The brain and nervous system are functioning at about 8 weeks. The is
the key stage at which the child is defined as a foetus as opposed to
an 'embryo'. After this the foetus is able to feel pain.
"The structures needed to sense and feel pain are present and working
in the unborn child before 10 weeks gestation" - Foetal Sentience,
Peter McCullagh MD DPhil MRCP.
So? I disagree, but I don't see it matters.
"Sensory and motor nerves start to work at eight weeks, when the
nervous system is already extensive. The movements of unborn children
at this stage are not all random but can be in response to stimuli.
Nerves, which carry sensation from the skin to the spinal cord, develop
by six or seven weeks" - Some observations on early human foetal
movements, J E Fitzgerald and W F Windle, Journal of Comparative
Neurology 1942 - 76, pages 159 to 167
According to the DoH's statistics for 2004, 60% of abortions take place
at 10 weeks or less. However, they fail to clarify figures before and
after the 8 week point.
"At 11 weeks the child moves around freely and is growing very fast.
The foetus is now bigger than the placenta, and the sac around the baby
fills with fluid to allow the growing baby to move around and exercise.
He or she can now respond to light, noise and pressure. He or she can
produce complex facial expressions and even smile..." (H B Valman and J
F Pearson, "What the foetus feels", British Medical Journal, 26 January
1980).
80% of neurologists who responded to a Daily Telegraph survey said that
unborn babies should be given pain relief during abortions from the
11th week of pregnancy - Daily Telegraph, 11 October 2000
28% of abortions are carried out at between 10 - 13 weeks gestation,
leaving 12% that are carried out at between 13 - 24 weeks
(unquantified).
"By 14 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in
all parts of the body (except in the skin on the back of the head)" -
V. Collins, S. Zielinski and T. Marzen, "Fetal Pain and Abortion: the
Medical Evidence", Studies in Law and Medicine, No 18, 1984. V.
Collins is Professor of Anaesthesiology at the University of Illinois.
Babies born at 23 weeks have a 17 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 24 weeks have a 39 per cent chance of survival
Babies born at 25 weeks have a 50 per cent chance of survival
Twenty years ago, approx 20% of babies weighing less than 1,000gms (2lb
2oz) at birth survived. Nowadays, about 80% survive. (www.bliss.org.uk)
and that with the
progress of science we are close to a time when it will be legal to
abort children at an age when they could be medically saved.
Irrelevant. Whether a fetus can or cannot be medically saved is not a
factor in allowing a woman to get an abortion if that is her choice.
Nor should it be.
If you can describe the capacity of an unborn child to survive outside
the womb, let alone feel pain, as irrelevant to whether his/her life
should be legally terminated, you are effectively a bigot on this issue
and your views are of limited value. I quote the above for the
consideration of those reading who havent closed their minds on this
issue.
I cant see
how any moral system can justify this.
Almost everybody who refers to "moral"
means "what I think that you should do".
Quite right. And people who shy away from the word know they hold views
that they cant actually justify.
Exactly why should anyone be required to 'justify' something?
A woman is pregnant. She does not wish to be pregnant. A safe and
simple medical procedure is available to terminate her unwanted
pregnancy. Why should she not avail herself of this?
What is the big deal about this?
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 01:39:38 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
A woman is pregnant. She does not wish to be pregnant. A safe and
simple medical procedure is available to terminate her unwanted
pregnancy. Why should she not avail herself of this?
What is the big deal about this?
erm... guess
Not to sound patronising or anything, but how old are you ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 02:23:44 PM |
|
|
On 29 Aug 2005 11:39:38 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125340778.885594.322310@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
A woman is pregnant. She does not wish to be pregnant. A safe and
simple medical procedure is available to terminate her unwanted
pregnancy. Why should she not avail herself of this?
What is the big deal about this?
erm... guess
Not to sound patronising or anything, but how old are you ?
Probably much older than you are. I have been retired for 12 years.
After college and working for 30 years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 04:57:19 AM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Not to sound patronising or anything, but how old are you ?
Probably much older than you are. I have been retired for 12 years.
After college and working for 30 years.
Ahh the '60's man. What a generation. What a legacy you left us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 08:15:10 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 02:57:19 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125395839.153492.113480@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
Not to sound patronising or anything, but how old are you ?
Probably much older than you are. I have been retired for 12 years.
After college and working for 30 years.
Ahh the '60's man. What a generation. What a legacy you left us.
I will not take responsibility for the 60's. Or the 70's for that
matter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
29 Aug 2005 09:54:45 PM |
|
|
the Good Captain <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
A woman is pregnant. She does not wish to be pregnant. A safe and
simple medical procedure is available to terminate her unwanted
pregnancy. Why should she not avail herself of this?
What is the big deal about this?
erm... guess
You're a Taliban-wannabe who has a perverse need to subjugate women
and punish sex?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 05:43:28 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a Taliban-wannabe who has a perverse need to subjugate women
and punish sex?
It must be nice to have such a black and white view of the world. Saves
all that unpleasant thinking, you know how that gives you a headache.
But I'll spell it out, actions have consequences. If the consequence of
unprotected sex is a pregnancy then the child is a fact and its no more
morally acceptable to kill it than it would be to kill an adult human
who was preventing you doing what you wanted to do. QED: dont have
unprotected sex unless you want to concieve. Its nothing to do with
being anti-sex, there are plenty of contraceptive methods available.
Its about responsibility, respect for yourself and respect for life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 08:17:48 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 03:43:28 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125398608.127894.135810@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a Taliban-wannabe who has a perverse need to subjugate women
and punish sex?
It must be nice to have such a black and white view of the world. Saves
all that unpleasant thinking, you know how that gives you a headache.
But I'll spell it out, actions have consequences. If the consequence of
unprotected sex is a pregnancy then the child is a fact
Not for nine months.
and its no more
morally acceptable to kill it than it would be to kill an adult human
If you feel that way don't get an abortion. But don't try to force
your opinions on anyone else.
who was preventing you doing what you wanted to do. QED: dont have
unprotected sex unless you want to concieve.
That is not your rule to make. Nor to enforce.
Its nothing to do with
being anti-sex, there are plenty of contraceptive methods available.
Its about responsibility, respect for yourself and respect for life.
It is about people doing as they are told. Forget it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 10:45:21 AM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
If the consequence of
unprotected sex is a pregnancy then the child is a fact
Not for nine months.
during that nine month period the child is growing inside the woman's
womb... hence this debate. read up on it if you're not sure.
and its no more
morally acceptable to kill it than it would be to kill an adult human
If you feel that way don't get an abortion. But don't try to force
your opinions on anyone else.
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy. Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion. At
least I've tried to back up why I feel the way I do.
who was preventing you doing what you wanted to do. QED: dont have
unprotected sex unless you want to concieve.
That is not your rule to make. Nor to enforce.
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
Its nothing to do with
being anti-sex, there are plenty of contraceptive methods available.
Its about responsibility, respect for yourself and respect for life.
It is about people doing as they are told. Forget it.
We live by laws. When Rowe v Wade is overturned you can make your case
democratically in your local community, just as it should have been
done all along.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 12:59:33 PM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 08:45:21 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125416721.248215.46280@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
If the consequence of
unprotected sex is a pregnancy then the child is a fact
Not for nine months.
during that nine month period the child is growing inside the woman's
womb... hence this debate. read up on it if you're not sure.
There is no child before live birth. A z/e/f is developing.
and its no more
morally acceptable to kill it than it would be to kill an adult human
If you feel that way don't get an abortion. But don't try to force
your opinions on anyone else.
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
Do you think anyone really cares how you 'see' something? No human
being exists prior to live birth and your use of the word 'innocent'
shows you have a religious agenda.
You can be ignored on that basis alone.
Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion.
Why? What is the big deal? Are humans an endangered species? Isn't
it the business of those involved and not you?
At
least I've tried to back up why I feel the way I do.
Basically you want to force everyone to live according to your
dictates.
Forget is.
who was preventing you doing what you wanted to do. QED: dont have
unprotected sex unless you want to concieve.
That is not your rule to make. Nor to enforce.
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
I am a human being, I have a vote in this, and I am not alone either.
Its nothing to do with
being anti-sex, there are plenty of contraceptive methods available.
Its about responsibility, respect for yourself and respect for life.
It is about people doing as they are told. Forget it.
We live by laws. When Rowe v Wade is overturned you can make your case
democratically in your local community, just as it should have been
done all along.
Should have been in your opinion. And if R v W is reversed you are
going to see millions of outraged women throwing a lot of politicians
out of work.
Basically you have nothing new to say do you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 01:41:35 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
Do you think anyone really cares how you 'see' something? No human
being exists prior to live birth and your use of the word 'innocent'
shows you have a religious agenda.
You can be ignored on that basis alone.
'Innocent' is a word that pretty well fits the circumstances. The child
didnt ask to be concieved. If you dont care how I see things stop
trying to howl me down. You think I'm going to back down to your
torrent of bile?
Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion.
Why? What is the big deal? Are humans an endangered species? Isn't
it the business of those involved and not you?
I've already pointed out to you that the distinction between you and I,
and both sides of this argument generally, is that you see the foetus
as an adjunct of the woman's body; to be disposed of as she sees fit. I
see it as a human being with rights. I'm content to see this issue
argued out in public, whereas, like most of your kind, you seem content
to hide behind Rowe v Wade and howl down any dissent. I wonder why?
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
I am a human being, I have a vote in this, and I am not alone either.
Then recognise that you will need to argue rationally.
We live by laws. When Rowe v Wade is overturned you can make your case
democratically in your local community, just as it should have been
done all along.
Should have been in your opinion. And if R v W is reversed you are
going to see millions of outraged women throwing a lot of politicians
out of work.
The decision on R v W will not be made by politicians but by the
Supreme Court. While women dont seem to be taking part in this
particular usenet spat (they no doubt have much better things to do),
they will no doubt make their feelings felt on both sides of the
argument when the time comes.
Basically you have nothing new to say do you?
Niether do you. The arguments are well rehearsed
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
31 Aug 2005 05:00:11 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 11:41:35 -0700, "the Good Captain"
<concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> in alt.abortion with message-id
<1125427295.172922.18220@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
Do you think anyone really cares how you 'see' something? No human
being exists prior to live birth and your use of the word 'innocent'
shows you have a religious agenda.
You can be ignored on that basis alone.
'Innocent' is a word that pretty well fits the circumstances. The child
didnt ask to be concieved.
An appendix did not ask to be removed.
I notice you did not deny you have a religious agenda.
If you dont care how I see things stop
trying to howl me down. You think I'm going to back down to your
torrent of bile?
Probably not. The self-righteous always continue no matter what.
Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion.
Why? What is the big deal? Are humans an endangered species? Isn't
it the business of those involved and not you?
I've already pointed out to you that the distinction between you and I,
and both sides of this argument generally, is that you see the foetus
as an adjunct of the woman's body; to be disposed of as she sees fit. I
see it as a human being with rights.
And I have pointed out that how you 'see' something does not matter.
Society does not agree with you, a fetus is not a human being, and it
has no rights.
I'm content to see this issue
argued out in public, whereas, like most of your kind, you seem content
to hide behind Rowe v Wade and howl down any dissent. I wonder why?
No one is hiding anywhere. The current situation is the proper
situation and should remain in effect.
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
I am a human being, I have a vote in this, and I am not alone either.
Then recognise that you will need to argue rationally.
Why argue at all? I am satisfied with the current situation.
We live by laws. When Rowe v Wade is overturned you can make your case
democratically in your local community, just as it should have been
done all along.
Should have been in your opinion. And if R v W is reversed you are
going to see millions of outraged women throwing a lot of politicians
out of work.
The decision on R v W will not be made by politicians but by the
Supreme Court.
True, but since they are appointed and confirmed by politicians it is
the politicians who will bear the brunt of the anger. Millions of
young women do not bother to vote now, but if a fundamental right they
have had all their lives is removed they will demand satisfaction. And
reinstatement.
While women dont seem to be taking part in this
particular usenet spat (they no doubt have much better things to do),
they will no doubt make their feelings felt on both sides of the
argument when the time comes.
They do now - by getting an abortion if they need one.
Basically you have nothing new to say do you?
Niether do you. The arguments are well rehearsed
No arguments are needed. I am simply pointing out life as it has been
for a third of a century.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 09:11:06 PM |
|
|
the Good Captain <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
Do you think anyone really cares how you 'see' something? No human
being exists prior to live birth and your use of the word 'innocent'
shows you have a religious agenda.
You can be ignored on that basis alone.
'Innocent' is a word that pretty well fits the circumstances. The child
didnt ask to be concieved.
The woman didn't ask to be pregnant.
But you have an agenda and you want to make sure that it is the woman
who suffers.
Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion.
Why? What is the big deal? Are humans an endangered species? Isn't
it the business of those involved and not you?
I've already pointed out to you that the distinction between you and I,
and both sides of this argument generally, is that you see the foetus
as an adjunct of the woman's body; to be disposed of as she sees fit. I
see it as a human being with rights.
And what rights are those?
Be specific.
Do they include the right to use another person's body and cause them
harm and injury?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 01:03:23 PM |
|
|
the Good Captain <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
If the consequence of
unprotected sex is a pregnancy then the child is a fact
Not for nine months.
during that nine month period the child is growing inside the woman's
womb... hence this debate. read up on it if you're not sure.
and its no more
morally acceptable to kill it than it would be to kill an adult human
If you feel that way don't get an abortion. But don't try to force
your opinions on anyone else.
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
If I see you as an immoral, woman-hating hypocrite I'm not obligated
to silently stand by and let you kill women.
Nor am I likely to
refrain from supporting the saving of lives by preventing abortion.
Don't pretend that you give a ***** about human lives when it's obvious
that you're just using that as an excuse to make women suffer.
who was preventing you doing what you wanted to do. QED: dont have
unprotected sex unless you want to concieve.
That is not your rule to make. Nor to enforce.
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
And obviously you feel that pregnant women are not human being and
should be enslaved to your corrupt agenda.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 01:24:30 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
If I see you as an immoral, woman-hating hypocrite I'm not obligated
to silently stand by and let you kill women.
Jeez, how did you get so fucked up?
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
And obviously you feel that pregnant women are not human being and
should be enslaved to your corrupt agenda.
Have you ever actually kissed a girl?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
30 Aug 2005 08:55:48 PM |
|
|
"the Good Captain" <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
If I see abortion as the killing of an innocent human being, I am not
liable to shut up about it to keep you happy.
If I see you as an immoral, woman-hating hypocrite I'm not obligated
to silently stand by and let you kill women.
Jeez, how did you get so fucked up?
You should ask that of yourself before you start using that brush.
I'm a human being, I have a vote in this and I'm not alone.
And obviously you feel that pregnant women are not human being and
should be enslaved to your corrupt agenda.
Have you ever actually kissed a girl?
Well, son, Ray's at least been honest with his opinions...and I can see the
logic in his statement. Of course, I've only been pro-choice for 35 years by
now, which hasn't stopped me from being a husband, parent, and grandparent,
either. (You'll have to take your dead parrot away. This isn't Bolton.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
31 Aug 2005 02:34:29 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
If I see you as an immoral, woman-hating hypocrite I'm not obligated
to silently stand by and let you kill women.
Jeez, how did you get so fucked up?
You should ask that of yourself before you start using that brush.
Why do you all think that simply gainsaying what I've said is a witty
reposte?... I based my judgement of your pal Ray on his posts. He is
one cold hearted, paranoid, sad and sorry individual. I dont actually
care what you, he or any of the rest of you think of me for having the
temerity to stand up to your ***** in here.
Well, son,
Hi Pops
Ray's at least been honest with his opinions...and I can see the
logic in his statement.
Ray is honest in his opinions the way a small mongrel dog with twisted
nuts is honest with its opinions. And he makes about as much sense. He
yaps and barks at anything thinking he's mean but only causes
amusement. He thinks I want to kill women because I have some regard
for unborn life. He also thinks pain relief for unborns about to
undergo abortion is a waste of money. If thats a guy you feel the need
to defend then you need to rethink your position, Pops.
Of course, I've only been pro-choice for 35 years by
now, which hasn't stopped me from being a husband, parent, and grandparent,
either.
Im glad you have a happy home life, Pops, but does being pro-choice
mean you close your mind and your heart to the possibility that the
foetus feels pain and distress? That you can say that removing the
unborn child is the equivalent of having your toe amputated as another
'pro-choice' correspondent put it?
(You'll have to take your dead parrot away. This isn't Bolton.)
er... yeah
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
31 Aug 2005 11:42:57 PM |
|
|
"the Good Captain" <concerned_citizen77@hotmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
If I see you as an immoral, woman-hating hypocrite I'm not obligated
to silently stand by and let you kill women.
Jeez, how did you get so fucked up?
You should ask that of yourself before you start using that brush.
Why do you all think that simply gainsaying what I've said is a witty
reposte?... I based my judgement of your pal Ray on his posts. He is
one cold hearted, paranoid, sad and sorry individual. I dont actually
care what you, he or any of the rest of you think of me for having the
temerity to stand up to your ***** in here.
Oh, well, maybe someone will clue you in on how to ignore us heathens.
Well, son,
Hi Pops
Respect for your elders has its benefits.
Ray's at least been honest with his opinions...and I can see the
logic in his statement.
Ray is honest in his opinions the way a small mongrel dog with twisted
nuts is honest with its opinions. And he makes about as much sense. He
yaps and barks at anything thinking he's mean but only causes
amusement. He thinks I want to kill women because I have some regard
for unborn life. He also thinks pain relief for unborns about to
undergo abortion is a waste of money. If thats a guy you feel the need
to defend then you need to rethink your position, Pops.
Free clue, Sherlock: if you're going to pretend to be a mind-reader, you have
to be able to use your mind.
Of course, I've only been pro-choice for 35 years by
now, which hasn't stopped me from being a husband, parent, and grandparent,
either.
Im glad you have a happy home life, Pops, but does being pro-choice
mean you close your mind and your heart to the possibility that the
foetus feels pain and distress? That you can say that removing the
unborn child is the equivalent of having your toe amputated as another
'pro-choice' correspondent put it?
I'm concerned with the person you refuse to deal with: the woman who's
pregnant and might not want to be. It's her choice to make, and I don't
choose for her, but will defend her right to make her choice, regardless of
what it is. Your opinion is irrelevant at best.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Good Captain" |
|
| Title: Re: 12-Week-Old Fetus Screams! |
01 Sep 2005 04:56:57 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
I based my judgement of your pal Ray on his posts. He is
one cold hearted, paranoid, sad and sorry individual. I dont actually
care what you, he or any of the rest of you think of me for having the
temerity to stand up to your ***** in here.
Oh, well, maybe someone will clue you in on how to ignore us heathens.
I'm having too much fun at the moment. Dont worry, when I get bored
you'll be ignored
Well, son,
Hi Pops
Respect for your elders has its benefits.
Two way street. I didnt start this
Ray is honest in his opinions the way a small mongrel dog with twisted
nuts is honest with its opinions. And he makes about as much sense. >>He yaps and barks at anything thinking he's mean but only causes
amusement. He thinks I want to kill women because I have some regard
for unborn life. He also thinks pain relief for unborns about to
undergo abortion is a waste of money. If thats a guy you feel the need
to defend then you need to rethink your position, Pops.
Free clue, Sherlock: if you're going to pretend to be a mind-reader, you have
to be able to use your mind.
No, that one didnt work. My comment was clearly based on what you and
he have said.
does being pro-choice
mean you close your mind and your heart to the possibility that the
foetus feels pain and distress? That you can say that removing the
unborn child is the equivalent of having your toe amputated as another
'pro-choice' correspondent put it?
I'm concerned with the person you refuse to deal with: the woman who's
pregnant and might not want to be. It's her choice to make, and I don't
choose for her, but will defend her right to make her choice, regardless of
what it is. Your opinion is irrelevant at best.
She is free to choose between right and wrong. Once again I have never
said abortion shouldnt be available but it should be the last resort
and one of a range of options. You are speaking up for people who think
it has the same moral equivalence as having a tooth out. There are many
women who have had abortions who have been mentally scarred for life.
There is no doubt an unwanted pregnancy is a major event in a womans
life, for some it can be disastrous and a safety net should be there,
but using abortion as a retrospective form of contraception, when
contraception is freely available is plain wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
Development of the unborn ... Week 12... A Week of Bush Is Like A Year of Clinton After this week, do you believe Kerry flip-flops? During National Character Counts Week, Bush Stumps for Philanderer (Washington Post) "Floating on top was a 20-week-old foetus" -- BBC News J Young Christian Morality: Ted Haggard Rails Against "Lies and Deceptions" Last Week (GOP=Hypocrites and Liars) Ages of Iraqi "Insurgents" Killed by US Troops Last Week: 75, 30, 28, 23, 23, 22, 6, 5, 5, 3, 3 (GOP, The Party of Treason) The Hateful Liberal Quote Of The Week
| The Treasonous Liberal Quote Of The Week The Anti-American Liberal Quote Of The Week Macy's removes Pride Week display Re: In the past week nearly 5,000 members of the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS) have downloaded special 'megaphone' software that alerts them to anti-Israeli chatrooms or internet polls to enable them to post contrary viewpoints Supreme Court to Hear Major Abortion Case Next Week Re: 3rd U.S. Chopper Shot Down This Week! Re: In the past week nearly 5,000 members of the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS) have downloaded special 'megaphone' software that alerts them to anti-Israeli chatrooms or internet polls to enable them to post contrary viewpoints
|
|
|