| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"osprey" |
| Date: |
22 Jul 2005 06:09:30 PM |
| Object: |
A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
With the use of camera's London police were able to identify suspects
and follow them. The public was also able to see the images of the
suspects. Today, London police chased down and shot one of the
suspects.
We no longer live in the kind of world we once lived in prior to 9/11.
Today, we live in a world where we don't know who the enemy is or when
the enemy will strike. Freedom is a fragile thing and sometimes people
take it for granted. A right to privacy is expected in our homes;
however, when we walk in the public streets there is no expectation of
privacy.
The Fourth Amendment says that we shall not be subjected to unlawful
search and seizure. Using camera's on our public streets and in
buildings is not an unlawful search and/or seizure. In fact, we see
the benefits of the camera in London and we should realize that this is
the new world we live in today.
.
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
22 Jul 2005 08:21:49 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
===========================
I'm all for the use of cameras - as long as they're out on the streets and
in public places. Who cares if Big Brother is watching people on the
streets, in public buildings and subways? Stores have had cameras for years
now.
--
CR.......
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as
erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin."
[Cardinal Bellarmine 1615, during the trial of Galileo]
================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 05:26:41 AM |
|
|
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
off topic
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 07:55:04 AM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
<snip>
Don't go that route.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 12:51:15 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2005 05:55:04 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122123304.684927.5970@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
<snip>
Don't go that route.
Because you say so?
I say again:
Off topic
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 03:17:09 PM |
|
|
Attila wrote:
On 23 Jul 2005 05:55:04 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122123304.684927.5970@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
<snip>
Don't go that route.
Because you say so?
No, because it's an easy opportunity to show how hypocritical you can
be. You often times discuss many issues in alt.abortion that have
absolutely nothing to do with abortion. Example: Discussions on WWII,
where you and I both agree on the issue.
I am just trying to save you some embarrassment, but hey..if you want
to embarrass yourself and be hypocritical, be my guest. But don't be
surprised when others see your hypocrisy as well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 04:13:59 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2005 13:17:09 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122149829.542651.39030@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 23 Jul 2005 05:55:04 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122123304.684927.5970@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
<snip>
Don't go that route.
Because you say so?
No, because it's an easy opportunity to show how hypocritical you can
be. You often times discuss many issues in alt.abortion that have
absolutely nothing to do with abortion. Example: Discussions on WWII,
where you and I both agree on the issue.
I agree. However, that has nothing to do with pointing out other
posts which are also off topic.
I am just trying to save you some embarrassment, but hey..if you want
to embarrass yourself and be hypocritical, be my guest. But don't be
surprised when others see your hypocrisy as well.
I am not embarrassed at all. I agree I frequently participate in off
topic discussions here, but that does nothing to make them less off
topic. If you or anyone else wishes to point out they are also off
topic I have no problem with that being done.
And the origional post under this thread has nothing to do with
abortion and thus is off topic here.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sneekers" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 11:02:15 AM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2005 05:55:04 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[...]
Off-topic and irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Salah al-Din Yusuf Ibn Ayyub" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 11:22:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 06:26:41 -0400, Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1122073770.380764.12060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
off topic
Christ what a whiney *****.
Change your name, your a disgrace to Attila
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Salah al-Din Yusuf Ibn Ayyub" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 11:23:28 AM |
|
|
On 22 Jul 2005 16:09:30 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
With the use of camera's London police were able to identify suspects
and follow them. The public was also able to see the images of the
suspects. Today, London police chased down and shot one of the
suspects.
We no longer live in the kind of world we once lived in prior to 9/11.
Today, we live in a world where we don't know who the enemy is or when
the enemy will strike. Freedom is a fragile thing and sometimes people
take it for granted. A right to privacy is expected in our homes;
however, when we walk in the public streets there is no expectation of
privacy.
The Fourth Amendment says that we shall not be subjected to unlawful
search and seizure. Using camera's on our public streets and in
buildings is not an unlawful search and/or seizure. In fact, we see
the benefits of the camera in London and we should realize that this is
the new world we live in today.
I would have been more impressed if the cameras had stopped the
bombers. Other than that, good post.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cracklin" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
23 Jul 2005 10:00:24 PM |
|
|
"Salah al-Din Yusuf Ibn Ayyub" <jihadi1115@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oir4e1p7nub17sg1dulk0d02i1dgl9rqvq@4ax.com...
I would have been more impressed if the cameras had stopped the
bombers. Other than that, good post.
================
I was told the Christian god Jehovah is roasting those men (who hit the WTC
and bombed other innocents to death) in hellfire and brimstone. No 72
virgin anything for them.
--
CR...........
What the world needs is not dogma but an attitude of scientific
inquiry combined with a belief that the torture of millions is
not desirable, whether inflicted by Stalin or by a Deity imagined
in the likeness of the believer. ~ Bertrand Russell ~
~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ * ~~ ~~ * ~~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
26 Jul 2005 09:03:52 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
26 Jul 2005 10:31:37 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
some who might try it including other would be criminals.
You are the moron who can't understand the benefit's of using camera's
in public places.
The tragic incident that happened in London could not be prevented;
however, with the faces being displayed there is a better chance people
will be able to identify and they can be captured.
Moron
.
|
|
|
| User: "E. Dickenson " |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
27 Jul 2005 06:27:57 AM |
|
|
On 26 Jul 2005 20:31:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
some who might try it including other would be criminals.
It worked well in London. Not.
A suicide bomber who is comitted to his cause aren't going to care
what people on the pther side of that camera will see.
You are the moron who can't understand the benefit's of using camera's
in public places.
The tragic incident that happened in London could not be prevented;
however, with the faces being displayed there is a better chance people
will be able to identify and they can be captured.
Moron
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "E. Dickenson " |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
27 Jul 2005 06:50:00 AM |
|
|
On 26 Jul 2005 20:31:37 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
some who might try it including other would be criminals.
It worked well in London. Not.
A suicide bomber who is comitted to his cause isn't going to care what
people on the other side of that camera will see.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
26 Jul 2005 11:10:03 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
26 Jul 2005 11:38:26 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
While camera's will never totally prevent crime and terrorism can never
be totally prevented, camera's still offer the best solution by far in
helping to deter some crime and aiding criminal investigators in
capturing and prosecuting criminals.
Now I know you have a hard time reading and understanding so let me
point this out to you a little more clearly moron.
While camera's will never "totally" prevent crime.
No one said camera's will stop crime.
Now *****, do some research on the issue and get back to me.
Get lost moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ricky Ticket" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 12:21:33 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 0:38:26 -0400, osprey wrote
(in message <1122439106.686559.218940@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>):
*****
moron.
moron.
The words of your Mom and dad still echoing in your head Spud? :D
--
"Flew on combat missions" --Osprey (on one of the many things he did in the
military. The only problem is he never left the U.S.)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
27 Jul 2005 12:49:39 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
27 Jul 2005 07:31:07 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
little research on the topic *****.
This has nothing to do with "goose-stepping"; however, if there ever
was a goose stepper it would be you and all the others who rushed to
the theater as Michael Moore told you to.
Moron
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ricky Ticket" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 12:22:48 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 8:31:07 -0400, osprey wrote
(in message <1122467467.357046.157540@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>):
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
little research on the topic *****.
This has nothing to do with "goose-stepping"; however, if there ever
was a goose stepper it would be you and all the others who rushed to
the theater as Michael Moore told you to.
Moron
I like your new sig Osprey. :D
--
"You were the one stupid enough to take the bait, so don't call me a
moron" --Osprey (blaming the victim for his lies)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
27 Jul 2005 09:32:23 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
The moron ignores the facts and pretends that other people are stupid.
What an *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 09:25:26 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
The moron ignores the facts and pretends that other people are stupid.
What an *****.
Ignoring what facts *****?
Camera's are beneficial, they do help deter some crime and they do help
criminal investigators. Those are the facts *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 12:04:19 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
The moron ignores the facts and pretends that other people are stupid.
What an *****.
Ignoring what facts *****?
Camera's are beneficial, they do help deter some crime and they do help
Repeating your ***** doesn't make it true, *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 12:26:34 PM |
|
|
"Gay Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Are you ever going to stop posting your DNC propaganda?
How much do your masters at the DNC pay you anyway?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 03:22:13 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
The moron ignores the facts and pretends that other people are stupid.
What an *****.
Ignoring what facts *****?
Camera's are beneficial, they do help deter some crime and they do help
Repeating your ***** doesn't make it true, *****.
Do a little research on the benefits on the use of camera's on public
streets and how they have helped law enforcement find people, find
clues, identify criminals, and help solve cases.
Get back to me boy when you can do a little bit of research.
Oh...
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
28 Jul 2005 11:01:35 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Recently the debate in here has been over the use of surveillance
camera's. Some feel as if the Government is invading our privacy, some
say that the use of camera's on public streets and in buildings are not
an invasion of privacy.
Recent bombings in London have hightened our awareness once again and
reminded us of just how vunerable we are to terrorism. However, we can
see in London with the use of camera's that camera's do serve a
purpose.
Like preventing subway bombings?
Moron.
Moron,
Terrorism can not be prevented; however, with camera's we can deter
Sure doesn't look that way, *****. People who are willing to commit
suicide aren't going to be deterred by video cameras.
And the proof is the bombings in London.
*****, do a little research.
Lessee, there were dozens of people killed in London despite the
presense of cameras.
Looks like you're still a stupid goose-stepping control freak, *****.
Looks like you don't understand the issue and you are unable to do a
The moron ignores the facts and pretends that other people are stupid.
What an *****.
Ignoring what facts *****?
Camera's are beneficial, they do help deter some crime and they do help
Repeating your ***** doesn't make it true, *****.
Do a little research on the benefits on the use of camera's on public
You're just a goose-stepping fascist who wants a police state. To
hell with civil rights, you want to make the whole country into one of
your prisons.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: A good example of why camera's are beneficial |
29 Jul 2005 03:17:05 AM |
|
|
"Gay Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Are you ever going to stop posting your DNC propaganda?
How much do your masters at the DNC pay you anyway?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
