A natural copntraceptive? Sucking vs massaging breasts



 Science > Abortion > A natural copntraceptive? Sucking vs massaging breasts

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: ""
Date: 10 Mar 2006 06:20:50 PM
Object: A natural copntraceptive? Sucking vs massaging breasts
I have this notion that while making love, sucking the woman s breasts
would give her body the message that you dont want children, that she
is ALREADY feeding a baby and therefore the body would not prepare for
a new baby. On the contrary, if you only massage the breasts, it would
trigger in the body the idea that there-is-no-milk or, in other words,
that there is no baby. Of course there would be hormones or other
chemical messengers (an idea from Greniewsky's book on cybernetics)
being delivered to he reproductive system or the brain to further
propare other chemicals, etc that would make the woman s body more or
less likely to be impregnated. Can somebody point to studies in this
matter? This is amatter for a statistical study, not just an "I think
so" or "I dont think so" answer.
Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER