| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
28 Dec 2003 01:45:44 PM |
| Object: |
a NEW lie from coward bobby, #4 |
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:n9-dnX-0IKOOrHKiRVn-jg@comcast.com:
[...]
i am using your new lie in my .sig. i urge you to repost it as
often as possible.
--
"James Keegan has shown he does not favor and/or support
legalized abortion."
-coward bobby heishman lying as "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
news:1eednfCfCfJV3nOiRVn-hg@comcast.com:
.
|
|
| User: "golddodgearies" |
|
| Title: Re: a NEW lie from coward bobby, #4 |
28 Dec 2003 04:43:27 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns945F9626D874Dkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.167>...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:n9-dnX-0IKOOrHKiRVn-jg@comcast.com:
[...]
i am using your new lie in my .sig. i urge you to repost it as
often as possible.
I know this is probably asking too much of your warped little
murderer's 'mind', but the issue is whether the direct abortion of a
living child is objectively murder. (Notice the group names:
alt.abortion, talk.abortion. Pretty misleading, I know, but do your
best to overlook it, okay?)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: a NEW lie from coward bobby, #4 |
29 Dec 2003 07:38:41 AM |
|
|
On 28 Dec 2003 14:43:27 -0800, (golddodgearies) in
alt.abortion with message-id
<44e87bc2.0312281443.88c5fd0@posting.google.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns945F9626D874Dkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.167>...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:n9-dnX-0IKOOrHKiRVn-jg@comcast.com:
[...]
i am using your new lie in my .sig. i urge you to repost it as
often as possible.
I know this is probably asking too much of your warped little
murderer's 'mind', but the issue is whether the direct abortion of a
living child is objectively murder. (Notice the group names:
alt.abortion, talk.abortion. Pretty misleading, I know, but do your
best to overlook it, okay?)
I have asked several time what you mean by 'objectively murder' and how it
differs from simply murder but you won't answer. Why is that?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: a NEW lie from coward bobby, #4 |
29 Dec 2003 07:53:47 AM |
|
|
prochoice@killspam.bigfoot.com. wrote in
news:ggb0vvg6vm1fh5ulq1u2c5mcfe8le20dng@4ax.com:
On 28 Dec 2003 14:43:27 -0800, (golddodgearies)
in alt.abortion with message-id
<44e87bc2.0312281443.88c5fd0@posting.google.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns945F9626D874Dkeegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.167>...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:n9-dnX-0IKOOrHKiRVn-jg@comcast.com:
[...]
i am using your new lie in my .sig. i urge you to repost it as
often as possible.
I know this is probably asking too much of your warped little
murderer's 'mind', but the issue is whether the direct abortion of a
living child is objectively murder. (Notice the group names:
alt.abortion, talk.abortion. Pretty misleading, I know, but do your
best to overlook it, okay?)
I have asked several time what you mean by 'objectively murder' and how
it differs from simply murder but you won't answer. Why is that?
why indeed.
--
"James Keegan has shown he does not favor and/or support
legalized abortion."
-coward bobby heishman lying as "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
news:1eednfCfCfJV3nOiRVn-hg@comcast.com:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
