A simple question



 Science > Abortion > A simple question

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "vernonner3voltazim"
Date: 17 Mar 2006 10:00:00 AM
Object: A simple question
For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?
.

User: "osprey"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 11:41:10 AM
vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?

I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely. However, I
think as a civilized society and one that is supposed to care for life
and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.
I think abortion is wrong, so let me just get that out of the way.
While I can sympathize and certainly understand some of the arguments
for abortion, such as rape cases and incest, for the most part I think
99% of all abortions are just plain out wrong.
I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.
Such as...
A woman may not want to have the baby because she can not afford to
or
A woman may not want to be a mother just yet
or
A woman may have other plans and having a child at this point in time
would only interfere with her plans, such as finishing school.
The above reasons are reasons based on matters of convenience. It
would be an "inconvenience" if she was to carry out the pregnancy.
Now, I am sure there are tons of other reasons but I think those are
the top three.
So as a society that is supposed to be educated and responsible do we
look the other way and excuse irresponsible actions for irresponsible
behavior?
That's where I think that as a society we must work together, come to a
medium, and work on a resolution that can satisfy both sides.
I think there should be restrictions on abortion.
If a woman is past the first tri-mester I think that abortion should
not be allowed, unless the mothers life is truly in danger and the only
possible way to save her life is to abort the unborn child. The
chances of this happening though are VERY rare, almost unheard of in
our nation due to our excellent medical experts.
So while I can not think of a reason to "outlaw" abortion all together
I can think of reasons that it should be restricted.
I also support that minors who are pregnant and are seeking abortion,
that their parents and/or guardians are notified before. After all,
abortion really is no different than any other medical procedure or
surgical procedure and we always have to have parental and/or guardian
permission before any surgical procedure is done to a minor, unless
it's a life threatening emergency and doctors must act "now" or else
the minor will die. Then I think medical doctors have an obligation to
save her life.
So there is my opinion. Restrictred - yes Parental and/or guardian
notification - yes
Outlawed entirely - no Education to teach our kids to avoid getting
into a situation in which abortion may have to be considered - STRONGLY
AGREE. I support abstinence teaching as well as other safe methods
that prevent pregnancy.
Abortion is a legal choice, and as with any legal choice I will always
support a persons right to choose from one of those legal choices.
That does not mean I have to support "the choice".
And that goes for all legal choices, I don't isolate abortion to the
"pro-choice" agenda.
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 11:44:28 AM
In article <1142617270.230674.177100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.

your ill-informed and baseless opinions are meaningless.
.
User: "ritpg"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 01:01:39 PM
Instead of disagreeing, why don't you propose the real reason women
abort their babies. So you say it isn't for convenience. That's easy.
Now what's you reason women abort their young. And please try to
consider the record. We all know that it is not to save a life in vast
majority of cases.
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: A simple question 19 Mar 2006 05:59:58 PM
In article <1142622099.925681.260110@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:

Instead of disagreeing, why don't you propose the real reason women
abort their babies.

no woman has ever aborted a baby.
you need to learn what words mean before you misuse them
.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 10:11:04 PM
In article <1142622099.925681.260110@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:

Instead of disagreeing, why don't you propose the real reason women
abort their babies. So you say it isn't for convenience. That's easy.
Now what's you reason women abort their young. And please try to
consider the record. We all know that it is not to save a life in vast
majority of cases.

But that doesn't make it "convenience."
.

User: "Paul Anderson"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 04:35:53 PM
On 17 Mar 2006 11:01:39 -0800, "ritpg" <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:

Instead of disagreeing, why don't you propose the real reason women
abort their babies. So you say it isn't for convenience. That's easy.
Now what's you reason women abort their young. And please try to
consider the record. We all know that it is not to save a life in vast
majority of cases.

No one aborts babies. No one aborts their young.
m-w.com: Abortion: 1 : the termination of a pregnancy after,
accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the
embryo or fetus.
Repeat: the act of abortion is the termination of the pregnancy.
Women abort their pregnancies because they have no reason to continue
what is a great bodily harm and serious risk to health and life.
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 09:55:10 PM
ritpg <ritpg@hotmail.com> wrote:

Instead of disagreeing, why don't you propose the real reason women
abort

Childbirth is:
1) Expensive
2) Injurious
3) Painful
4) Expensive
5) Risky

So you say it isn't for convenience. That's easy.

And it's true.

Now what's you reason women abort their young.

They abort their pregnancies, pro-liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.



User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 10:11:04 PM
In article <1142617270.230674.177100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?


I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely. However, I
think as a civilized society and one that is supposed to care for life
and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.

Under the Bush White House, the future generation will be paying taxes
like they can hardly imagine. But the Republicans still want lower
taxes today by borrowing more and more.


I think abortion is wrong, so let me just get that out of the way.

Gee, you had us fooled until now.

While I can sympathize and certainly understand some of the arguments
for abortion, such as rape cases and incest, for the most part I think
99% of all abortions are just plain out wrong.

Incest is rape, dummy. What is this, "rape and incest?"


I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.

Propaganda.

Such as...

A woman may not want to have the baby because she can not afford to

But you want the child to be born to a family that can't afford it and
also have the child impact the current family - how "pro-life".

or
A woman may not want to be a mother just yet

Prove that.

or
A woman may have other plans and having a child at this point in time
would only interfere with her plans, such as finishing school.

And you feel you should be able to tell her what her priorities should
be.


The above reasons are reasons based on matters of convenience.

Propaganda.

It
would be an "inconvenience" if she was to carry out the pregnancy.

Is that why you had a unwanted child?


Now, I am sure there are tons of other reasons but I think those are
the top three.

Based on your desire to believe it.


So as a society that is supposed to be educated and responsible do we
look the other way and excuse irresponsible actions for irresponsible
behavior?

Why haven't you adopted?


That's where I think that as a society we must work together, come to a
medium, and work on a resolution that can satisfy both sides.

I think there should be restrictions on abortion.

Who cares?


If a woman ...

Your opinions are merely opinions. No reasoning or facts supporting
them.
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 02:38:13 PM
On 17 Mar 2006 09:41:10 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1142617270.230674.177100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> wrote:


vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?


I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely. However, I
think as a civilized society

Which means what?

and one that is supposed to care for life

As defined by who?

and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.

Says who?


I think abortion is wrong,

Right and wrong have no intrinsic values and will change from person
to person and over time.

so let me just get that out of the way.
While I can sympathize and certainly understand some of the arguments
for abortion, such as rape cases and incest, for the most part I think
99% of all abortions are just plain out wrong.

As defined by you.


I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.

So what? Many things are done for convenience. Or do you hunt and/or
grow your own food?

Such as...

A woman may not want to have the baby because she can not afford to

Is there anything you don't do because you can't afford it?

or
A woman may not want to be a mother just yet

Is there anything you don;t do because you don't want to?

or
A woman may have other plans and having a child at this point in time
would only interfere with her plans, such as finishing school.

Do you choose from conflicting desires when you decide what you are
going to do?


The above reasons are reasons based on matters of convenience. It
would be an "inconvenience" if she was to carry out the pregnancy.

So what?


Now, I am sure there are tons of other reasons but I think those are
the top three.

Of course, no one is required to give any reason or justification for
a decision made under the freedom of choice.


So as a society that is supposed to be educated and responsible do we
look the other way and excuse irresponsible actions for irresponsible
behavior?

Irresponsible as defined by you? I would consider either decision as
being responsible.


That's where I think that as a society we must work together, come to a
medium, and work on a resolution that can satisfy both sides.

As long as it agrees with what you want.


I think there should be restrictions on abortion.

There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion - she wants
it.
There is only one reason for a woman not to get an abortion - she
doesn't want it.


If a woman is past the first tri-mester I think

An activity for which you have demonstrated you are unqualified.

that abortion should
not be allowed, unless the mothers life is truly in danger and the only
possible way to save her life is to abort the unborn child. The
chances of this happening though are VERY rare, almost unheard of in
our nation due to our excellent medical experts.

So while I can not think of a reason to "outlaw" abortion all together
I can think of reasons that it should be restricted.

Mostly because you don't approve.


I also support that minors who are pregnant and are seeking abortion,
that their parents and/or guardians are notified before. After all,
abortion really is no different than any other medical procedure or
surgical procedure and we always have to have parental and/or guardian
permission before any surgical procedure is done to a minor, unless
it's a life threatening emergency and doctors must act "now" or else
the minor will die. Then I think medical doctors have an obligation to
save her life.

If a girl is able to become pregnant she should be allowed to make her
own decision.


So there is my opinion. Restrictred - yes

No.

Parental and/or guardian
notification - yes

No.

Outlawed entirely - no Education to teach our kids to avoid getting
into a situation in which abortion may have to be considered - STRONGLY
AGREE. I support abstinence teaching

Which does not work.

as well as other safe methods
that prevent pregnancy.

Abortion is a legal choice, and as with any legal choice I will always
support a persons right to choose from one of those legal choices.
That does not mean I have to support "the choice".

And that goes for all legal choices, I don't isolate abortion to the
"pro-choice" agenda.

.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 11:57:57 PM
Attila wrote:

On 17 Mar 2006 09:41:10 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1142617270.230674.177100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> wrote:


vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?


I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely. However, I
think as a civilized society


Which means what?

and one that is supposed to care for life


As defined by who?

and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.


Says who?


I think abortion is wrong,


Right and wrong have no intrinsic values and will change from person
to person and over time.

so let me just get that out of the way.
While I can sympathize and certainly understand some of the arguments
for abortion, such as rape cases and incest, for the most part I think
99% of all abortions are just plain out wrong.


As defined by you.

As it is my right to have my own opinion. Too bad you can't handle it.



I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.


So what? Many things are done for convenience. Or do you hunt and/or
grow your own food?


Such as...

A woman may not want to have the baby because she can not afford to


Is there anything you don't do because you can't afford it?

or
A woman may not want to be a mother just yet


Is there anything you don;t do because you don't want to?

or
A woman may have other plans and having a child at this point in time
would only interfere with her plans, such as finishing school.


Do you choose from conflicting desires when you decide what you are
going to do?


The above reasons are reasons based on matters of convenience. It
would be an "inconvenience" if she was to carry out the pregnancy.


So what?


Now, I am sure there are tons of other reasons but I think those are
the top three.


Of course, no one is required to give any reason or justification for
a decision made under the freedom of choice.


So as a society that is supposed to be educated and responsible do we
look the other way and excuse irresponsible actions for irresponsible
behavior?


Irresponsible as defined by you? I would consider either decision as
being responsible.


That's where I think that as a society we must work together, come to a
medium, and work on a resolution that can satisfy both sides.


As long as it agrees with what you want.

Do you know what "come to a medium" means?
Obviously you don't.
This is why most of you on the pro-choice side have to side with each
other in here, no one else will respect you.



I think there should be restrictions on abortion.


There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion - she wants
it.

There is only one reason for a woman not to get an abortion - she
doesn't want it.


If a woman is past the first tri-mester I think


An activity for which you have demonstrated you are unqualified.


that abortion should
not be allowed, unless the mothers life is truly in danger and the only
possible way to save her life is to abort the unborn child. The
chances of this happening though are VERY rare, almost unheard of in
our nation due to our excellent medical experts.

So while I can not think of a reason to "outlaw" abortion all together
I can think of reasons that it should be restricted.


Mostly because you don't approve.

Mostly because that's my opinion. You and your ilk sure have a problem
with opinions if they don't agree with you.



I also support that minors who are pregnant and are seeking abortion,
that their parents and/or guardians are notified before. After all,
abortion really is no different than any other medical procedure or
surgical procedure and we always have to have parental and/or guardian
permission before any surgical procedure is done to a minor, unless
it's a life threatening emergency and doctors must act "now" or else
the minor will die. Then I think medical doctors have an obligation to
save her life.


If a girl is able to become pregnant she should be allowed to make her
own decision.

If she is a minor, her parents and/or guardian should be notified as is
the case for almost every other medical prodecure and/or emergency.


So there is my opinion. Restrictred - yes


No.

Yes, but then again I value life and you don't.


Parental and/or guardian
notification - yes


No.

Yes, but then again I support parents rights and you don't.



Outlawed entirely - no Education to teach our kids to avoid getting
into a situation in which abortion may have to be considered - STRONGLY
AGREE. I support abstinence teaching


Which does not work.

It works 100% of the time when applied


as well as other safe methods
that prevent pregnancy.

Ooooh...Attila got quiet on this one.




Abortion is a legal choice, and as with any legal choice I will always
support a persons right to choose from one of those legal choices.
That does not mean I have to support "the choice".

And that goes for all legal choices, I don't isolate abortion to the
"pro-choice" agenda.

chirp..chirp...chirp...can't think of anything Attila?
.
User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: A simple question 18 Mar 2006 12:54:47 PM
In article <1142661477.874176.210510@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

as well as other safe methods
that prevent pregnancy.


Ooooh...Attila got quiet on this one.

He probably figures you are an idiot. Right on, Attila!
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: A simple question 18 Mar 2006 09:32:25 AM
On 17 Mar 2006 21:57:57 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1142661477.874176.210510@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> wrote:


Attila wrote:

On 17 Mar 2006 09:41:10 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1142617270.230674.177100@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> wrote:


vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?


I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely. However, I
think as a civilized society


Which means what?

and one that is supposed to care for life


As defined by who?

and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.


Says who?


I think abortion is wrong,


Right and wrong have no intrinsic values and will change from person
to person and over time.

so let me just get that out of the way.
While I can sympathize and certainly understand some of the arguments
for abortion, such as rape cases and incest, for the most part I think
99% of all abortions are just plain out wrong.


As defined by you.


As it is my right to have my own opinion. Too bad you can't handle it.

Of course you can. And I have a right to punch holes in that opinion
at my option.




I think the major reason women do abort are for matters of convenience.


So what? Many things are done for convenience. Or do you hunt and/or
grow your own food?


Such as...

A woman may not want to have the baby because she can not afford to


Is there anything you don't do because you can't afford it?

or
A woman may not want to be a mother just yet


Is there anything you don;t do because you don't want to?

or
A woman may have other plans and having a child at this point in time
would only interfere with her plans, such as finishing school.


Do you choose from conflicting desires when you decide what you are
going to do?


The above reasons are reasons based on matters of convenience. It
would be an "inconvenience" if she was to carry out the pregnancy.


So what?


Now, I am sure there are tons of other reasons but I think those are
the top three.


Of course, no one is required to give any reason or justification for
a decision made under the freedom of choice.


So as a society that is supposed to be educated and responsible do we
look the other way and excuse irresponsible actions for irresponsible
behavior?


Irresponsible as defined by you? I would consider either decision as
being responsible.


That's where I think that as a society we must work together, come to a
medium, and work on a resolution that can satisfy both sides.


As long as it agrees with what you want.


Do you know what "come to a medium" means?

I know what you mean, even if I have never heard it expressed quite
that way before.


Obviously you don't.

This is why most of you on the pro-choice side have to side with each
other in here, no one else will respect you.

The only resolution that will satisfy the fanatics in the anti-choice
faction is complete elimination of the freedom of choice. After all,
their god told them to do this and therefore no other action is
conceivable.





I think there should be restrictions on abortion.


There is only one reason for a woman to get an abortion - she wants
it.

There is only one reason for a woman not to get an abortion - she
doesn't want it.


If a woman is past the first tri-mester I think


An activity for which you have demonstrated you are unqualified.


that abortion should
not be allowed, unless the mothers life is truly in danger and the only
possible way to save her life is to abort the unborn child. The
chances of this happening though are VERY rare, almost unheard of in
our nation due to our excellent medical experts.

So while I can not think of a reason to "outlaw" abortion all together
I can think of reasons that it should be restricted.


Mostly because you don't approve.


Mostly because that's my opinion. You and your ilk sure have a problem
with opinions if they don't agree with you.

You problem is in having what you say analyzed and having what it is
clearly pointed out.





I also support that minors who are pregnant and are seeking abortion,
that their parents and/or guardians are notified before. After all,
abortion really is no different than any other medical procedure or
surgical procedure and we always have to have parental and/or guardian
permission before any surgical procedure is done to a minor, unless
it's a life threatening emergency and doctors must act "now" or else
the minor will die. Then I think medical doctors have an obligation to
save her life.


If a girl is able to become pregnant she should be allowed to make her
own decision.


If she is a minor, her parents and/or guardian should be notified as is
the case for almost every other medical prodecure and/or emergency.

The possibility of a parent or guardian being responsible for the
condition in the first place is not usually a factor.



So there is my opinion. Restrictred - yes


No.


Yes, but then again I value life and you don't.


Parental and/or guardian
notification - yes


No.


Yes, but then again I support parents rights and you don't.

No, I do not.




Outlawed entirely - no Education to teach our kids to avoid getting
into a situation in which abortion may have to be considered - STRONGLY
AGREE. I support abstinence teaching


Which does not work.


It works 100% of the time when applied

Which almost never happens. If it did the entire birth control
industry would be redundant.



as well as other safe methods
that prevent pregnancy.


Ooooh...Attila got quiet on this one.

No. I have no problem with any method that prevents unwanted
pregnancy. I have a problem with mandating one method to the
exclusion of all others.






Abortion is a legal choice, and as with any legal choice I will always
support a persons right to choose from one of those legal choices.
That does not mean I have to support "the choice".

And that goes for all legal choices, I don't isolate abortion to the
"pro-choice" agenda.



chirp..chirp...chirp...can't think of anything Attila?

You usual intelligent comment.
.

User: "Miriam Cohen"

Title: Re: A simple question 18 Mar 2006 09:21:50 AM
osprey LIED:

I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en


"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en

.



User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 10:49:57 PM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

vernonner3voltazim wrote:

For the pro-lifers....
What general statement can you make, that is provably Objectively True
(e.g. "The Earth is spherical"), from which it can be logically deduced
that abortions should be prohibited?


I dont' think abortion should be "outlawed" completely.

You've claimed you don't want it outlawed at all. Looks like you're
somewhat flexible in your claims. As usual.

However, I
think as a civilized society and one that is supposed to care for life
and for our future generation that we must assume some responsibility
in the protection of life, even the unborn.

Only the onborn since you right-winger really don't care what happens
to people who have been born.

I think abortion is wrong, so let me just get that out of the way.

For no better reason than you don't like it.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Miriam Cohen"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 01:22:51 PM
osprey LIED:

I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en


"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en

.

User: "vernonner3voltazim"

Title: Re: A simple question 17 Mar 2006 12:00:54 PM
osprey wrote:

I think as a civilized society and one that is supposed to
care for life and for our future generation that we must
assume some responsibility in the protection of life,
even the unborn.

Is that your statement? Where is the evidence that proves it
to be Objectively True? I say that the reason your statement
is NOT true is simple: The existence of abortions has not in
the slightest threathened the existence of civilized society.
That is, sufficient births have occurred, despite availiability
of abortion, to maintain the existence of civilized society.
Therefore it is not logical to prohibit abortions based on
the unproven claim that the prohibition allows civilized
society to continue to exist.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
A Simple Question --Take 2
Re: Simple question for Ray Fischer
A Simple Question
Re: Simple question for Robert Heishman
Re: The plain and simple Jewish truth......
Re: John Kerry - is an ANTI- CATHOLIC... Read and be enlightened to this simple, but profound fact
Re: Knock knock Steve Hayes, can you read SIMPLE American English?
Re: UPgraded || Knock knock Agamemnon, can you read SIMPLE American English?
Re: John Kerry - is an ANTI- CATHOLIC... Read and be enlightened to this simple, but profound fact
if you can read, you can know the truth. real simple!!!
Ree: Just Listen (real simple)
Re: John Kerry - is an ANTI- CATHOLIC... Read and be enlightened to this simple, but profound fact
Re: John Kerry - is an ANTI- CATHOLIC... Read and be enlightened to this simple, but profound fact
Failing Iraq, Bush Declares War on the Press (GOP=Treason. Pure and Simple)
Re: Knock knock Lazarus Cain, can you read SIMPLE American English?
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER