| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Sgt. America" |
| Date: |
03 Nov 2005 10:12:14 PM |
| Object: |
A truly unqualified SC Nominee |
....Ruth Bader Ginsburg!
Enjoy.....
http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/2004/roberts031704.htm
Radical Feminists on the U.S. Supreme Court
March 17, 2004
by Carey Roberts
Just five short days after President Bill
Clinton's nomination, Ruth Bader Ginsburg had
been confirmed by the Senate and sworn in as
Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court. That was
during the Dog Days of August 1993.
Obviously, the Clinton Administration wanted
to fast-track the process so no one would
have time to ask any embarrassing questions.
Because of her low-key manner, people
believed Ginsburg was a moderate. But if the
Senate had bothered to look into Ginsburg's
background, they would have been troubled,
indeed.
Ruth Ginsburg received her law degree from
Columbia Law School. In 1971 she established
the Women's Rights Project at the American
Civil Liberties Union. Throughout the 1970s
Ginsburg acquired a first-hand knowledge of
the workings of the Supreme Court as she
argued six cases - all feminist issues - to
the Justices.
Ruth Ginsburg made the same assumption as the
rest of the feminist movement. She accepted
without question the Marxist claim that women
's role as mothers and wives is inherently
oppressive. And she believed that equality of
opportunity should always translate into
identical social roles.
In 1977, Ginsburg wrote a report for the
Commission on Civil Rights titled "Sex Bias
in the U.S. Code". This report demanded 800
changes to federal laws in order to eliminate
any and all distinctions between men and
women.
For starters, the report claims that the Boy
Scouts perpetuate stereotyped sex roles, so
they must be gender-integrated or abolished.
You can't help but wonder if the current
Leftist hostility to the Boy Scouts stems
from this recommendation.
Then we are instructed to clean up our
speech: "manmade" must be changed to
"artificial," "midshipman" to
"midshipperson," and so forth. Why the report
fails to object to such obviously sexist
terms as "mother tongue," "Mother Nature,"
"ladybug," and "sister city," I can't
possibly guess.
But page 206 of this report is where it all
comes out. There we learn of Ginsburg's grand
vision to reshuffle the deck of the
traditional family. She proposes to do away
with the husband-as-primary-breadwinner
concept:
"Congress and the President should direct
their attention to the concept that pervades
the Code: that the adult world is (and should
be) divided into two classes--independent
men, whose primary responsibility is to win
bread for a family, and dependent women,
whose primary responsibility is to care for
children and household. This concept must be
eliminated from the Code if it is to reflect
the equality principle."
But we're still not done. On page 214
Ginsburg urges us to adopt Communist-style
day care services: "The increasingly common
two-earner family pattern should impel
development of a comprehensive program of
government-supported child care."
Radicals often moderate their stance as they
get older and wiser. But not Ruth Ginsburg.
On January 29, Justice Bader appeared at a
lecture sponsored by the National
Organization for Women Legal Defense Fund.
Over the years the NOW Legal Defense Fund has
used the cover of gender equality to promote
their agenda of destabilizing the family and
promoting Marxist ideals. Justice Ginsburg
not only appeared at the meeting, she
introduced the speaker for the 4th Annual
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Distinguished Lecture
Series on Women and the Law.
In that appearance, Ginsburg showed that she
remains ever-faithful to the Sisterhood.
Plus, she fostered the perception that she
lacks judicial impartiality and objectivity.
As Hofstra University law professor Monroe
Freedman remarked, "I think this crosses the
line."
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's writings reveal the
true intentions of radical feminism: achieve
a gender-less society and impose totalitarian
ideals on American society. And her recent
appearance at a NOW conference reveals she
still hews to the fem-socialist line.
Justice Ginsburg is now 70 years old, and may
step down from the bench in a few years. But
for now, radical feminists can rest assured
that they have a friend in very high places.
Carey Roberts
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
