| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james" |
| Date: |
17 Apr 2005 05:10:13 PM |
| Object: |
abortion |
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before. Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child. i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one. In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans. Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
.
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
17 Apr 2005 09:22:39 PM |
|
|
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term just to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted children in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18 and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of unwanted
children already here.
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 04:24:28 AM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426319f0$0$79453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
Gender biased.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term just to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted children
in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18 and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of unwanted
children already here.
Whne will you get off your SEXIST, GENDER BIASED agenda?
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion
that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
Bad advice from you.
Practice what you preach, wimpy.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
The USA is NOT Alberta.
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
Move away, because the people of the USA will impose whatever they want to
IMPOSE on underling wimps like you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 10:18:55 PM |
|
|
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
It isn't.
Gender biased.
It is cruel to force either man or woman or child to give birth.
There is no gender bias anywhere.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Wrong, lunatic.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 04:38:05 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:24:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<QWK8e.78573$f%4.4274@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426319f0$0$79453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
Gender biased.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Which does not apply outside of your opinion, which is unimportant.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term just to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted children
in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18 and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of unwanted
children already here.
Whne will you get off your SEXIST, GENDER BIASED agenda?
Do you mean not making women second class citizens?
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion
that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
Bad advice from you.
Not as bad as your's.
Practice what you preach, wimpy.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
The USA is NOT Alberta.
But it can learn from others.
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
Move away, because the people of the USA will impose whatever they want to
IMPOSE on underling wimps like you.
Only with people like you in charge. What a nightmare.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 05:07:28 AM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:1qv661hj4n2i65sokd5ebhj74ufk8dpjp0@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:24:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<QWK8e.78573$f%4.4274@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426319f0$0$79453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a
woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
Gender biased.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Which does not apply outside of your opinion, which is unimportant.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term just
to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted
children
in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18
and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of unwanted
children already here.
When will you get off your SEXIST, GENDER BIASED agenda?
Do you mean not making women second class citizens?
Why do you feel as if pregnancy makes women second-class citizens?
Why do you think abortion makes them equals?
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion
that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
Bad advice from you.
Not as bad as your's.
Not really.
Practice what you preach, wimpy.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
The USA is NOT Alberta.
But it can learn from others.
Learn what?
How to denigrate women and children further?
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
Move away, because the people of the USA will impose whatever they want to
IMPOSE on underling wimps like you.
Only with people like you in charge. What a nightmare.
To you it's a nightmare, huh?
To many others it means freedom from the unjust.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 08:46:48 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 06:07:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<8zL8e.78728$f%4.54097@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:1qv661hj4n2i65sokd5ebhj74ufk8dpjp0@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:24:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<QWK8e.78573$f%4.4274@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426319f0$0$79453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a
woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
Gender biased.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Which does not apply outside of your opinion, which is unimportant.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term just
to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted
children
in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18
and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of unwanted
children already here.
When will you get off your SEXIST, GENDER BIASED agenda?
Do you mean not making women second class citizens?
Why do you feel as if pregnancy makes women second-class citizens?
I didn't.
Why do you think abortion makes them equals?
I don't.
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion
that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
Bad advice from you.
Not as bad as your's.
Not really.
No, your's is much worse.
Practice what you preach, wimpy.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
The USA is NOT Alberta.
But it can learn from others.
Learn what?
The advantages of some programs.
How to denigrate women and children further?
Unnecessary - you are here to do that.
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
Move away, because the people of the USA will impose whatever they want to
IMPOSE on underling wimps like you.
Only with people like you in charge. What a nightmare.
To you it's a nightmare, huh?
It would be.
To many others it means freedom from the unjust.
Only to those who cannot stand for people not to do as they are told.
People like you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 09:59:27 AM |
|
|
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:6de761dl0glj8nmi40gpi09l7ikntcjrl7@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 06:07:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<8zL8e.78728$f%4.54097@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:1qv661hj4n2i65sokd5ebhj74ufk8dpjp0@4ax.com...
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:24:28 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<QWK8e.78573$f%4.4274@bignews1.bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426319f0$0$79453$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"james" <mr_grondin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c46cfffc.0504171410.746c02bf@posting.google.com...
Abortion is a tough subject to talk about im not sure if its the
right
or wrong thing to do. Before i researched the topic i was totally
against abortions but now after reading some information im not so
sure what i think. I believe under the right circumstance it can be
the right thing to do. For example if a women has been raped and
could
not bare the thought of having a child after what has happened or if
by having the child it would cause you harm then for sure they should
be able to get an abortion. But if your having an abortion because
you
don't feel like your ready to have a child then i think you should
have thought about that before.
It's not for YOU or anyone else but the mother to decide. Forcing a
woman
to bear an unwanted child is cruel to both woman and child.
A sexist approach you use.
Gender biased.
Illegal according to the Civil Rights Act.
Which does not apply outside of your opinion, which is unimportant.
Instead of having an abortion you are
able to put the baby up for adoption were some couple would love to
adopt the child.
Why should the woman take the risk and expense of carrying to term
just
to
please people like YOU? There are already thousands of unwanted
children
in
state care. Many go from one foster home to another until they're 18
and
leave the system. You haven't mentioned all these thousands of
unwanted
children already here.
When will you get off your SEXIST, GENDER BIASED agenda?
Do you mean not making women second class citizens?
Why do you feel as if pregnancy makes women second-class citizens?
I didn't.
If you think women are second class citizens without the gender biased right
to abort, then how do you not see pregnnacy as making them second class
citizens?
Why do you think abortion makes them equals?
I don't.
So, why do you say without abortion on demand they would be second class
citizens?
i think the government needs to make a law were you
must state the reason why you must have an abortion before you are
able to have one.
No one CARES what people like YOU think. If you're against abortion
that's
fine, don't get anyone pregnant unless she wants a child.
Bad advice from you.
Not as bad as your's.
Not really.
No, your's is much worse.
You are now saying that women were second class citizens before abortion on
demand?
Practice what you preach, wimpy.
In Alberta they make it to easy for you to be able
to have one they even cover abortions in hospitals under the
provincial health insurance plans.
Nothing wrong with that.
The USA is NOT Alberta.
But it can learn from others.
Learn what?
The advantages of some programs.
Be specific.
How to denigrate women and children further?
Unnecessary - you are here to do that.
LOL!!!!!!!!
You are too freaky.
Its hard for me to decide if im for
against abortions because i have never been in that situation were i
feel its absolutely necessary to have one.
Feel whatever you want, just don't impose it on others.
Move away, because the people of the USA will impose whatever they want
to
IMPOSE on underling wimps like you.
Only with people like you in charge. What a nightmare.
To you it's a nightmare, huh?
It would be.
Why?
To many others it means freedom from the unjust.
Only to those who cannot stand for people not to do as they are told.
People like you.
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told, instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 10:16:48 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told,
Like in the communist countries? Who decides who tells the people what they
can and cannot do? You and people like you?
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 02:22:02 AM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> writes:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
You have an unfair advantage over Johnny. You're sane. :-)
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told,
Like in the communist countries? Who decides who tells the people what they
can and cannot do? You and people like you?
That's his dream, given his expressed sentiments.
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
It's not likely to, but the corporate ideal being pushed by today's
kleptocrats is hardly any more appealing - in both cases, if you're not part
of the elite, you're to keep quiet and do as you're told, and don't ask
inconvenient questions. (Me, I'm a conservative - but one in early 1960s
terms, when the GOP was respectable...in contrast to the party that's been
hijacked by the American Taliban in this age. Fortunately, those loons may be
starting to run into resistance from mainstream Americans who are starting to
ask questions.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 11:03:33 AM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:4263cf60$0$79459$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
Gender bias again.
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told,
Like in the communist countries?
No. Like in democratic republics like the USA was before 1973.
Who decides who tells the people what they
can and cannot do?
The people decide it, not some miniscule body of nine persons without any
input from the people.
You and people like you?
The people decide.
You got a problem with the form of government of the USA?
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
I am not saying communism.
Why are you for unrepresentative courtroom decisions?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 05:57:55 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:4263cf60$0$79459$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
Gender bias again.
Nobody cares about your dementia, Wentzky. (Except your new pal Heishman, and
he's ripping your arguments off to try and claim them for himself.)
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told,
Like in the communist countries?
No. Like in democratic republics like the USA was before 1973.
How the hell would YOU know? Some of my elders didn't have much good to say
about Amendment XVIII, back in 1921. This is still a democratic republic,
even with the mind-boggling stupidity of the leaders we elect, these days.
Who decides who tells the people what they
can and cannot do?
The people decide it, not some miniscule body of nine persons without any
input from the people.
Tell that to your lord and master in the White House, then.
You and people like you?
The people decide.
If you're too insane to be allowed to vote, you're excluded from "the
people". Chew on that fact.
You got a problem with the form of government of the USA?
You obviously do.
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
I am not saying communism. Why are you for unrepresentative courtroom
decisions?
Why are you for ignoring the law if it gets in the way of your obsession?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 04:06:45 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:MNQ8e.71123$UW6.28517@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:4263cf60$0$79459$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
Gender bias again.
Whatever that means.
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you
are
told,
Like in the communist countries?
No. Like in democratic republics like the USA was before 1973.
Who decides who tells the people what they
can and cannot do?
The people decide it, not some miniscule body of nine persons without any
input from the people.
You and people like you?
The people decide.
You got a problem with the form of government of the USA?
The PEOPLE decide if a woman aborts or not? Since when? It's the woman's
choice, not the people's choice.
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
I am not saying communism.
When people are TOLD what to do, such as forcing them to abort a wanted
fetus, that's communism.
Why are you for unrepresentative courtroom decisions?
Why are YOU for telling women what to do with their own bodies? Get a
vasectomy and you'll never have to worry about abortion again.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 06:04:11 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> writes:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:MNQ8e.71123$UW6.28517@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:4263cf60$0$79459$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:sTP8e.95673$vK6.17017@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
So, why are you trying to tell people what to do?
He isn't. It's a woman's choice to abort or not.
Gender bias again.
Whatever that means.
Keep in mind you're dealing with someone who is doing a bang-up job of proving
that he's clinically insane. I don't envy his neighbors in South Carolina at
all.
We are ready for people like you to take a back seat and to do as you are
told,
Like in the communist countries?
No. Like in democratic republics like the USA was before 1973.
Who decides who tells the people what they can and cannot do?
The people decide it, not some miniscule body of nine persons without any
input from the people.
You and people like you?
The people decide. You got a problem with the form of government of the
USA?
The PEOPLE decide if a woman aborts or not? Since when? It's the woman's
choice, not the people's choice.
Johnny lives in his own fantasy world, and believes what he says should be
regarded as fact, with no questions allowed.
instead of expecting everyone else to do as you say to do.
Time to change the command.
Are you ready?
Communism would never get a foothold in the USA..... if I understand you
correctly.
I am not saying communism.
When people are TOLD what to do, such as forcing them to abort a wanted
fetus, that's communism.
More accurately, it's totalitarianism.
Why are you for unrepresentative courtroom decisions?
Why are YOU for telling women what to do with their own bodies? Get a
vasectomy and you'll never have to worry about abortion again.
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience with a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 06:44:39 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience with a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
================================
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 09:36:19 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience with a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
I suspect Anderson is in no way being deprived of its village idiot.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 06:53:04 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience with
a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
================================
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 09:37:39 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience with a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at least
you've got an insanity defense.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 09:41:57 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these
newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual experience
with a
woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 10:41:32 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with control
issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could possibly
be construed as a threat. LS will make his/her own conclusion on that,
though. I'm just pointing out details that you're too insane and/or stupid to
consider.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 10:54:42 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control
issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at
least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly
be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
18 Apr 2005 11:43:16 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
Precisely what does "controlled by the State" mean in that slumgullion of a
mind of yours?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 12:31:03 AM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk4qe3v0kb.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been
amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at
least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
Precisely what does "controlled by the State" mean in that slumgullion of
a
mind of yours?
You still don't understand what things were like prior to Roe V Wade?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 01:07:53 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk4qe3v0kb.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at
least you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
Precisely what does "controlled by the State" mean in that slumgullion of a
mind of yours?
You still don't understand what things were like prior to Roe V Wade?
That should be fairly obvious, since that was handed down not long before I
turned 18...and unlike you, I possess a functional memory.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 15)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 10:13:41 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:xE09e.97457$vK6.42135@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk4qe3v0kb.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been
amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated
so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at
least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
Precisely what does "controlled by the State" mean in that slumgullion
of
a
mind of yours?
You still don't understand what things were like prior to Roe V Wade?
=================================================
Of course we all do. Woman were forced to seek illegal abortions and many
died. You feel that's BETTER then legal abortions with a very low death
rate for the women? Explain how and why you feel illegal abortions are
better for women.
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 11:40:32 AM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42652025$0$79455$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:xE09e.97457$vK6.42135@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk4qe3v0kb.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szky8bfv3f7.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekd7xzik.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42644669$0$79458$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkmzrvk7pw.fsf@eris.io.com...
Judging from his ravings in the two or three years he's been
amusing
these newsgroups, I seriously doubt he's ever had -any- sexual
experience with a woman...and he was born in 1961.
Johnny sounds like a typical backwoods bible thumping loony with
control issues to me.
The day is coming, coward, when people such as you who demonstrated
so
little control of themselves will be controlled by the State.
That could be construed as a threat, South Carolina Cuckoo...but at
least
you've got an insanity defense.
Now, you think the State is making threats?
It'd help if you'd think at all. You made the statement which could
possibly be construed as a threat.
"Controlled by the State" is me making a threat?
Precisely what does "controlled by the State" mean in that slumgullion
of
a
mind of yours?
You still don't understand what things were like prior to Roe V Wade?
=================================================
Of course we all do. Woman were forced
Forced? By who?
Sounds to me like you and your buds were forcing them.
to seek illegal abortions and many
died.
You crying that wimpy sob story again?
Funny thing is murderers should die.
Why are you against women dying who try to kill their own child?
You know what?
Now we can get DNA and find out who knoecked her up.
Ready to stop your hidden agenda now?
When you decide to stop concentreating only on the women and USING and
ABUSING them as your shiled to cover up your own illicit actions, then we
can make some real progress.
Just like I told someone already, you CAN BE CONTROLLED!
We have the technology.
BYE, BYE, ROE V WADE!!!!!!!!
LOL!!!!
You feel that's BETTER then legal abortions with a very low death
rate for the women? Explain how and why you feel illegal abortions are
better for women.
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 12:12:13 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42652025$0$79455$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
[...]
Of course we all do. Woman were forced to seek illegal abortions and many
died.
Forced? By who? Sounds to me like you and your buds were forcing them.
You've already demonstrated, beyond any reasonable doubt, that what you hear
is very likely your own defective imagination.
You crying that wimpy sob story again? Funny thing is murderers should die.
Abortion isn't murder, and never has been prosecuted as such in this country.
So much for that pipe dream of yours, eh?
Why are you against women dying who try to kill their own child?
Why do you think you can read minds, when you can't even figure out the
purpose of yours?
You know what?
More than you're capable of, it appears.
Now we can get DNA and find out who knoecked her up.
....*if* there is reasonable cause to suspect the commission of a crime, of
course.
Ready to stop your hidden agenda now?
Ready to act like you're even fractionally sane?
When you decide to stop concentreating only on the women and USING and
ABUSING them as your shiled to cover up your own illicit actions, then we
can make some real progress.
When you're locked away in wherever the South Carolina state loony bin is,
we'll be making progress, indeed.
Just like I told someone already, you CAN BE CONTROLLED!
Not by brain-transplant donors like you.
We have the technology.
You have ***** in copious quantities, and damn all else.
BYE, BYE, ROE V WADE!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!
Get back on your meds, SC Cracked Head.
You feel that's BETTER then legal abortions with a very low death
rate for the women? Explain how and why you feel illegal abortions are
better for women.
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
Explain why you can't accept that you're talking *to* a woman.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 17)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 01:49:54 PM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y3ebsia.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
Explain why you can't accept that you're talking *to* a woman.
==========================
Patrick, this Johnny is either mentally ill or an alcoholic/drug abuser.
He's certainly not playing with a full deck. Someone must have dragged him
here from soc.men where so many bitter, misogynistic men seem to hang out.
What could have possibly made this Johnny so bitter towards women?
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 06:11:06 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y3ebsia.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
Explain why you can't accept that you're talking *to* a woman.
Patrick, this Johnny is either mentally ill or an alcoholic/drug abuser.
The former, definitely (for reasons I've illustrated in another article); the
latter, I hope not.
He's certainly not playing with a full deck. Someone must have dragged him
here from soc.men where so many bitter, misogynistic men seem to hang out.
What could have possibly made this Johnny so bitter towards women?
You've already seen my partial explanation, though I don't remember him
crossposting to soc.men any time in the years he's been annoying the regulars
here...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 17)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 04:21:18 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426552d1$0$79465$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y3ebsia.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
Explain why you can't accept that you're talking *to* a woman.
==========================
Patrick, this Johnny is either mentally ill or an alcoholic/drug abuser.
He's certainly not playing with a full deck. Someone must have dragged
him
here from soc.men where so many bitter, misogynistic men seem to hang out.
What could have possibly made this Johnny so bitter towards women?
Why do you think my brain ignores the fact that men are involved in
pregnancies?
Why does your brain fail to mention such a simple fact?
Why do you resort to the half-witted apeal to compassion for women when we
all know how they are getting pregnant?
What are you trying to hide?
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: abortion |
19 Apr 2005 06:13:38 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:426552d1$0$79465$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8y3ebsia.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
Explain why you think women are supposed to be your fucksluts from hell?
Explain why you can't accept that you're talking *to* a woman.
Patrick, this Johnny is either mentally ill or an alcoholic/drug abuser.
He's certainly not playing with a full deck. Someone must have dragged him
here from soc.men where so many bitter, misogynistic men seem to hang out.
What could have possibly made this Johnny so bitter towards women?
Why do you think my brain ignores the fact that men are involved in
pregnancies?
Probably because you go out of your way to foster that impression.
Why does your brain fail to mention such a simple fact?
Why do you complain about a biological fact?
Why do you resort to the half-witted apeal to compassion for women when we
all know how they are getting pregnant? What are you trying to hide?
Why should anyone allow you to force them to tell you anything? You are most
assuredly no authority on anything (except possibly insanity).
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Utah 4, Houston 3 (SO) (April 17)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, April 19 at Chicago, 7:05 (Game 1)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
