| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
18 Dec 2005 01:46:58 PM |
| Object: |
Abortion |
My boyfriend has told me his ex-girlfriend has had 3 abortions. I
think he is lying or has been lied to as I thought our laws only permit
a woman to have one abortion. I reside in Scotland, UK. Can he be
right or am I?
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 01:48:24 PM |
|
|
I also should have added that the reason she supposedly had the
abortions was because she didn't want to have the babies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 02:05:33 PM |
|
|
On 18 Dec 2005 11:48:24 -0800,
<global_assassin@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
My boyfriend has told me his ex-girlfriend has had 3 abortions. I
think he is lying or has been lied to as I thought our laws only permit
a woman to have one abortion. I reside in Scotland, UK. Can he be
right or am I?
The reason she supposedly had the abortions was because she
didn't want to have the babies [that otherwise could have resulted].
Even in *this* RRR-Cult-infested (and thus far too repressive) land
across the pond from you (the USA), there is NO requirement anywhere
a woman to provide a "reason" for seeking the remedy of abortion... nor
is she restricted as to the number of times she can do so.
Therefore, I sincerely HOPE that the UK -- which is generally FAR
more progressive than this benighted place -- would also have no such
restrictions. Restricting abortions would make precisely as little sense
as it would to restrict the number of times a person could take aspirins to
cure a headache.
When you find out whether or not your country does, please let us
know.
(BTW -- the sig I'm providing in this post, can help you show any
abortion opponent you may know just how utterly *ludicrous* their
stance is. You are welcome to print it out and distribute it freely, our
disseminate it via the Internet. Either wit or without credit for its
authorship.)
-- Craig Chilton
(To E-mail me, remove the "_".)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryos &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 04:18:01 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <> wrote in message
news:ajdbq19g9b1m8rta15n5odoehgdl53o36h@4ax.com...
On 18 Dec 2005 11:48:24 -0800,
<global_assassin@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
My boyfriend has told me his ex-girlfriend has had 3 abortions. I
think he is lying or has been lied to as I thought our laws only permit
a woman to have one abortion. I reside in Scotland, UK. Can he be
right or am I?
The reason she supposedly had the abortions was because she
didn't want to have the babies [that otherwise could have resulted].
Even in *this* RRR-Cult-infested (and thus far too repressive) land
across the pond from you (the USA), there is NO requirement anywhere
a woman to provide a "reason" for seeking the remedy of abortion... nor
is she restricted as to the number of times she can do so.
Therefore, I sincerely HOPE that the UK -- which is generally FAR
more progressive than this benighted place -- would also have no such
restrictions. Restricting abortions would make precisely as little sense
as it would to restrict the number of times a person could take aspirins
to
cure a headache.
When you find out whether or not your country does, please let us
know.
(BTW -- the sig I'm providing in this post, can help you show any
abortion opponent you may know just how utterly *ludicrous* their
stance is. You are welcome to print it out and distribute it freely, our
disseminate it via the Internet. Either wit or without credit for its
authorship.)
-- Craig Chilton
(To E-mail me, remove the "_".)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryos &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I've never seen someone say so little in so many words Craig. Thanks for the
comic relief.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 09:03:25 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:18:01 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
<global_assassin@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
My boyfriend has told me his ex-girlfriend has had 3 abortions. I
think he is lying or has been lied to as I thought our laws only permit
a woman to have one abortion. I reside in Scotland, UK. Can he be
right or am I?
The reason she supposedly had the abortions was because she
didn't want to have the babies [that otherwise could have resulted].
Even in *this* RRR-Cult-infested (and thus far too repressive) land
across the pond from you (the USA), there is NO requirement anywhere
a woman to provide a "reason" for seeking the remedy of abortion... nor
is she restricted as to the number of times she can do so.
Therefore, I sincerely HOPE that the UK -- which is generally FAR
more progressive than this benighted place -- would also have no such
restrictions. Restricting abortions would make precisely as little sense
as it would to restrict the number of times a person could take aspirins
to cure a headache.
When you find out whether or not your country does, please let us
know.
(BTW -- the sig I'm providing in this post, can help you show any
abortion opponent you may know just how utterly *ludicrous* their
stance is. You are welcome to print it out and distribute it freely, our
disseminate it via the Internet. Either with or without credit for its
authorship.)
-- Craig Chilton
(To E-mail me, remove the "_".)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryos &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I've never seen someone say so little in so many words Craig.
Yes, you do that constantly. You wouldn't know a FACT if you
tripped over it. Not that it would make any difference, since **no**
relevant facts even EXIST that support the loathsome stance of you
ludicrous and laughingstock Anti-Choice bigots.
Thanks for the comic relief.
To the contrary. Than YOU for making such a complete fool
and ***** of yourself, for everyone to see.
The faster society becomes fully aware that only IDIOTS could
ever be Anti-Choice/RRR Cult lemming/homophobic bigots, the
SOONER will come the backlash against that bigotry.
Works for me!!
Keep up the good work, moronic tool.
-- Craig Chilton <>
--
RRR cult lemmings... dumber than dirt.
America's mentally-challenged version of the Taliban.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 09:24:02 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <> wrote in message
news:4b5cq19jussq2hc5f6rib11ibtjofpv2ok@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:18:01 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
<global_assassin@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
My boyfriend has told me his ex-girlfriend has had 3 abortions.
I
think he is lying or has been lied to as I thought our laws only permit
a woman to have one abortion. I reside in Scotland, UK. Can he be
right or am I?
The reason she supposedly had the abortions was because she
didn't want to have the babies [that otherwise could have resulted].
Even in *this* RRR-Cult-infested (and thus far too repressive) land
across the pond from you (the USA), there is NO requirement anywhere
a woman to provide a "reason" for seeking the remedy of abortion... nor
is she restricted as to the number of times she can do so.
Therefore, I sincerely HOPE that the UK -- which is generally FAR
more progressive than this benighted place -- would also have no such
restrictions. Restricting abortions would make precisely as little
sense
as it would to restrict the number of times a person could take aspirins
to cure a headache.
When you find out whether or not your country does, please let us
know.
(BTW -- the sig I'm providing in this post, can help you show any
abortion opponent you may know just how utterly *ludicrous* their
stance is. You are welcome to print it out and distribute it freely,
our
disseminate it via the Internet. Either with or without credit for its
authorship.)
-- Craig Chilton
(To E-mail me, remove the "_".)
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryos &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by it's immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the 21st century to date,
in the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic
period of time for any nation in the entire history of the
world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I've never seen someone say so little in so many words Craig.
Yes, you do that constantly. You wouldn't know a FACT if you
tripped over it. Not that it would make any difference, since **no**
relevant facts even EXIST that support the loathsome stance of you
ludicrous and laughingstock Anti-Choice bigots.
Yet you have run from countless calls to prove anything you say with
documented proof from reputables sources. So far you have proven only that
you are consistant only in not showing any proof for anything you say.
Thanks for the comic relief.
To the contrary. Than YOU for making such a complete fool
and ***** of yourself, for everyone to see.
The faster society becomes fully aware that only IDIOTS could
ever be Anti-Choice/RRR Cult lemming/homophobic bigots, the
SOONER will come the backlash against that bigotry.
Works for me!!
Keep up the good work, moronic tool.
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 09:39:57 PM |
|
|
In article <KHppf.66290$sg5.2025@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
you'll need to cite several credible sources to back up that bit of
apparently crazed thinking. i don't believe i have seen a published
study ever that shows anything other than that the majority wants
abortion to remain legal.
go ahead and earn the "insanity" element of your alias.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 10:18:44 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
In article <KHppf.66290$sg5.2025@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
you'll need to cite several credible sources to back up that bit of
apparently crazed thinking. i don't believe i have seen a published
study ever that shows anything other than that the majority wants
abortion to remain legal.
go ahead and earn the "insanity" element of your alias.
They had their chance at instituting their fascist agenda and blew it
because their ***** is just too draconian.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
18 Dec 2005 11:26:40 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
Keep up the good work, moronic tool.
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
100,000 innocent people in Iraq, for example. No, wait, that was the
result of you neocons and your culture of killing.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
19 Dec 2005 05:07:32 AM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
What culture of death?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
19 Dec 2005 11:45:01 AM |
|
|
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
What culture of death?
His.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Abortion |
19 Dec 2005 01:11:28 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
You are fighting a losing war. From the appearance of things, you are but
one of the increasingly shriking minority that wants to continue a culture
of death,
What culture of death?
His.
It's amazing that these anti-choicers actually seem to believe that they
are the majority. :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
