Science > Abortion > ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" |
| Date: |
24 Sep 2003 05:43:25 PM |
| Object: |
ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
(Hint: Abortion Does Cause Breast Cancer)
By Karen Malec
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
May 20, 2003
-From The Pro-Life Infonet
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link By Karen Malec
[Pro-Life Infonet Note: Karen Malec is the president
of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer.]
An official list of "known human carcinogens" released by
the Department of Health and Human Services in December
2002 includes steroidal estrogens for the first time. The
Report on Carcinogens states that steroidal estrogens are
used in estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and common
abortifacient drugs. Both kinds of drugs have been widely
utilized by American women. The federal report is
available on the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences website. [1]
While certain pharmaceuticals might provide limited
medical benefits, women must balance these considerations
against the fact that breast cancer is the second
greatest cause of cancer among American women. Clearly,
the Report on Carcinogens presents a serious conflict for
the National Cancer Institute (NCI), an agency of the
Department of Health and Human Services. In February, a
panel of grant-dependent scientists chosen by the NCI
swept under the rug staggering biological and
epidemiological evidence supporting a causal relationship
between abortion and breast cancer which has been amassed
over the last 46 years.
What do ERT and abortifacient drugs have to do with the
abortion-breast cancer (ABC) link? Estrogen overexposure
provides the biological explanation for most of the risk
factors for breast cancer, including abortion. Estrogen
is known to increase the rate of cell division. It causes
normal and pre-cancerous cells to multiply. A few days
after conception, estrogen levels start climbing, so that
by the end of the first trimester, a mothers estrogen
level is increased 2000% and her breasts are swollen.
Scientists theorize that only a third trimester process,
differentiation (maturation of cells), neutralizes the
mothers exposure to estrogen and provides her with
increased protection against breast cancer.
A booklet published by the Breast Cancer Prevention
Institute, "Breast Cancer Risks and Prevention", explains
the critical importance of an early first full term
pregnancy (before age 25). This influences breast cell
maturity and, consequently, a womans lifetime risk for
the disease. The booklet says:
"If a woman does not have a full-term pregnancy (meaning
she is childless or nulliparous), she has increased risk
for breast cancer, since she never develops (mature,
cancer-resistant) type 3 and 4 lobules. If she has
children later in life (after age 30), she has increased
risk, because, for most of her menstrual life, her
estrogen has been stimulating immature (cancer-
vulnerable) type 1 and 2 breast lobules. If she has
children as a teenager, she has decreased risk of breast
cancer, since her breast tissue matures very early in her
menstrual life to type 3 and 4 lobules." [2]
Similarly, women who experience more menstrual periods
during their lives are at greater risk. Why? With each
monthly period, theyre exposed to more estrogen. This is
why the risk is greater for women who have fewer or no
children, who breastfeed little or not at all, who
experience late menopause or early onset of menstrual
periods and who delay their first full term pregnancies.
On the other hand, alcohol consumption, lack of exercise
and obesity each increase breast cancer risk because they
cause a womans estrogen levels to be elevated.
Use of diethylstilbestrol (DES) has been linked with
increased risk. It is a synthetic estrogen given to
diabetic pregnant women at risk for miscarriage starting
in the 1940s. For almost 25 years, researchers told women
there was no link between DES and breast cancer. However,
because the disease develops slowly over time, it took 20
years before researchers were able to detect a trend in
the direction of increased risk.
Chris Kahlenborn, M.D. wrote in his book, Breast Cancer:
Its Link to Abortion and the Birth Control Pill, that
"The risk of DES appears to be greatest in women older
than 60." [3]
A similar trend can be observed among women of the Roe v.
Wade generation. A Report to the Nation on the Status of
Cancer for the period 1973 to 1998 from the National
Cancer Institute and other agencies reveals that an
increasing incidence of breast cancer could be observed
starting in 1987 14 years after the legalization of
abortion. [4] A graph provided by the reports authors,
figure 3, clearly shows that the more than 40% increase
in breast cancer rates since 1987 was sustained solely by
the youngest of three generations the Roe v. Wade
generation.
Just as the risk of breast cancer increases as DES users
age, the incidence of the disease is just as likely to
rise as the Roe generation ages.
What's the bottom line? Women have become scientists
human guinea pigs. The National Cancer Institute and
private cancer organizations are to blame for the nations
out-of-control breast cancer rates. If they really wanted
women to know the truth about the ABC link, they would
have informed women of the existence of the ongoing
research in 1973 when abortion was legalized.
This is why the NCIs leaders were afraid to debate the
evidence during its workshop earlier this year. They knew
they would lose.
References 1. See
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/oc/news/10thrc.htm
(December 11, 2002) Visited May 20, 2003.
2. Lanfranchi A, Brind J. Breast Cancer Risks and
Prevention. Breast Cancer Prevention Institute (2002) P.
8.
3. Kahlenborn C. Breast Cancer: Its Link to Abortion and
the Birth Control Pill. One More Soul. New York, New
York. (2000) P. 183.
4. Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM,
Feigal EG, Edwards BK. Annual report to the nation on the
status of cancer, 1973 through 1998, featuring cancers
with recent increasing trends. J Natl Cancer Inst
2001;93:824-842.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Just more proof that women are being exploited
by the abortion industry. "Keep 'em ignorant!"
They're laughing all the way to the bank.
Posted by Saundra Duffy
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
End of forwarded messages
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Panchaang for 29 Bhadrapad 5104, Wednesday, September 24, 2003:
Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Jivana Ritau
Kanya Mase Krishna Pakshe Buddh Vasara Yuktayam
Poorvaphalguni Nakshatr Shubh Yog
Vishti-Shakuni Karan Chaturdashi Yam Tithau
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of
this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent
the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law
and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
are not necessarily those of the poster.
.
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: childbirth causes cancer |
24 Sep 2003 06:49:43 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:health-0922.20030924@news.mantra.com...
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast
Jai is still a lying sack of *****, but I found this article from MSNBC's
home page:
COPENHAGEN, Denmark, Sept. 24 - Women whose children develop cancerous
tumors early in life are more likely to suffer from breast cancer,
scientists said on Wednesday.
NEW RESEARCH presented at the ECCO 12 European Breast Cancer Conference
showed that if the child is diagnosed with certain cancers before the age of
five, the mother had double the normal risk of breast cancer in the first 10
years after the birth.
If the child is a boy the overall risk in the mother is elevated by 50
percent.
"This study indicates that there is an overall significant excess risk of
breast cancer among mothers of children with solid tumors," Dr. Dong Pang,
of the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital in England, said in an
interview.
The odds of the mother developing the disease are higher in the years after
the birth of the child with cancer.
In what is believed to be the first study showing a link between breast
cancer in a mother and solid tumors in her child, Pang and his team studied
2,064 women whose children had suffered from tumors of the muscle and bone,
brain, liver, kidney, skin and other cancers before they were 15 years old.
Drum roll, please........:
"We think that a combination of disruption of the normal role of p53 in cell
cycle control and hormonal disruption during pregnancy contributes to the
development of breast cancer in the mother and cancer in the child," Pang
added.
It appears, as usual, that the anti-choicers have the facts completely
OPPOSITE of what they truly are.
I will, of course, start a new thread with this information.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: childbirth causes cancer |
24 Sep 2003 06:57:57 PM |
|
|
Here's the link to the story:
Mother, child cancer risks linked:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/970696.asp?0cv=CB20
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahoo.com> wrote in
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
24 Sep 2003 06:25:53 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:health-0922.20030924@news.mantra.com...
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
(Hint: Abortion Does Cause Breast Cancer)
No it doesn't, and you're a liar.
This myth has been debunked ad infinitium, ad nauseum.
What field are you a "doctor" in? Or is this some ***** title you made up
to prop up your oversized ego and undersized penis?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
26 Sep 2003 04:15:29 PM |
|
|
In article <5Kpcb.91788$KW1.6781@twister.austin.rr.com>, the_donald_13
@yahoo.com says...
Subject: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com
From: "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, alt.abortion, alt.politics.bush, alt.support.cancer
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" <usenet@mantra.com> wrote in message
news:health-0922.20030924@news.mantra.com...
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
(Hint: Abortion Does Cause Breast Cancer)
No it doesn't, and you're a liar.
Correct.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
24 Sep 2003 06:56:18 PM |
|
|
The other Donaldwho hasn't read the alt.support.cancer Charter (yet) wrote:
No it doesn't, and you're a liar.
This myth has been debunked ad infinitium, ad nauseum.
What field are you a "doctor" in? Or is this some ***** title you made up
to prop up your oversized ego and undersized penis?
http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html
Please take the time to read this document, especially if you are new to
alt.support.cancer.
What is strictly prohibited on this newsgroup?
Troll posting (cross-postings directed to a.s.c from other newsgroups with the
express purpose of disrupting the a.s.c group), flame baiting or unwarranted
flaming
is prohibited.
Usenet/ISP AUP commercial posting violations will be prosecuted, one occurrence
will
be considered an offense.
The newsgroup will prosecute violations of the Charter or FAQ as deemed
necessary by
the group.
Cross-posting should be limited to other appropriate groups. []
My "read" on the latter is either other alt.support or cancer newsgroups.
HTH and FYI
J
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: My apolgies (Was Re: ABORTION....) |
24 Sep 2003 07:05:34 PM |
|
|
"J" <FakeE@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3F722F22.83E57D48@execulink.com...
The other Donaldwho hasn't read the alt.support.cancer Charter (yet)
wrote:
No it doesn't, and you're a liar.
<snip>
My apologies, J.
I neither had the desire to intentionally post in your forum, nor to insult
anyone there.
A poster by the name of "Dr. Jai Something-or-other" has a habit of adding
numerous, unrelated NG's when beginning post threads. He is but a troll, and
many of us often do not catch all of the NG's that he chooses at random.
One of his favorite is "screenplays." Two weeks ago, some moron was
cross-posting in a similar manner to the "D&D" forum.
I will make a greater effort to make sure I catch these cross-postings in
the future.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "J" |
|
| Title: Re: My apolgies (Was Re: ABORTION....) |
24 Sep 2003 07:17:09 PM |
|
|
The other Donald wrote:
"J" <FakeE@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3F722F22.83E57D48@execulink.com...
The other Donaldwho hasn't read the alt.support.cancer Charter (yet)
wrote:
<snip>
My apologies, J.
I neither had the desire to intentionally post in your forum, nor to insult
anyone there.
<snip - we're very familiar with Jay>
I will make a greater effort to make sure I catch these cross-postings in
the future.
Thank you.
Cancer patients have enough on their hands w/o having to filter everyone who
replies to Jay's troll-postings.
J
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
26 Sep 2003 04:17:12 PM |
|
|
In article <3F722F22.83E57D48@execulink.com>, FakeE@invalid.invalid
says...
Subject: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com
From: J <FakeE@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion, alt.politics.bush, alt.support.cancer
The other Donaldwho hasn't read the alt.support.cancer Charter (yet) wrote:
No it doesn't, and you're a liar.
This myth has been debunked ad infinitium, ad nauseum.
What field are you a "doctor" in? Or is this some ***** title you made up
to prop up your oversized ego and undersized penis?
http://www.cancersupporters.com/asc/charter.html
Please take the time to read this document, especially if you are new to
alt.support.cancer.
Why don't you address this to the person who introduced your group to
the crosspost list?
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!
news.alt.net!net
From: (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
Newsgroups: misc.writing.screenplays,alt.fan.jai-
maharaj,alt.abortion,alt.politics.bush,alt.support.cancer
Subject: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Followup-To: misc.writing.screenplays,alt.fan.jai-
maharaj,alt.abortion,alt.politics.bush,alt.support.cancer
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:43:25 GMT
Organization: Mantra Corporation
Lines: 190
Approved: Jai Maharaj
Message-ID: <health-0922.20030924@news.mantra.com>
Reply-To: (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01
X-Url: http://www.mantra.com/jai http://www.flex.com/~jai
X-Face: $M)`}Wbl$fT~*VA]$8SvsoJ4+I=#=hV:F<YRWa7`&;bx4Z3:2!
DpSRtQO;Qy'D=_LltURQ@zB0=Dy5U%>#:U=WD@ZNJKqZxeG8A*!Da.y*]ZdM.$+4#nRh>
$("RuQJ@Ie/sK_
X-Warning: Not for commercial use. Views expressed by others not
necessarily poster's.
Xref: uni-berlin.de misc.writing.screenplays:418700 alt.fan.jai-
maharaj:30314 alt.abortion:283230 alt.politics.bush:1435808
alt.support.cancer:98733
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
(Hint: Abortion Does Cause Breast Cancer)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "beber" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER www.abortionbreastcancer.com |
25 Sep 2003 11:41:28 PM |
|
|
all right idiot.
breat cancer rates prior to bc introduction.
afterwards?
do you know.
then shut up.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ABORTION DOES CAUSE BREAST CANCER (Pro-liar disinformation) |
25 Sep 2003 03:07:35 AM |
|
|
followups.
Dr. Jai Maharaj <usenet@mantra.com> wrote:
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com
Carcinogens and the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
(Hint: Abortion Does Cause Breast Cancer)
Pro-liar propaganda. According to the United States government's
National Cancer Institute there is no link between abortion and breast
cancer.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
