| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Mike" |
| Date: |
22 Jan 2004 01:58:23 PM |
| Object: |
"Abortion foes battle on" |
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
22 Jan 2004 02:23:38 PM |
|
|
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75% of the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
22 Jan 2004 11:37:15 PM |
|
|
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75% of the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to choose.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 06:14:31 AM |
|
|
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75% of the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's right to choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your lies?
.
|
|
|
| User: "pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 03:19:28 PM |
|
|
(osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>...
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
< > wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75% of the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's right to
choose?
Look at just about any of your postings regarding abortion and it's
obvious you would like to see the choice removed.
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your lies?
Whine, hypocrite, whine...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 08:14:40 PM |
|
|
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75% of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's right to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you. If you
believe, for one moment, that your reputation as the biggest liar on
this NG can be diluted one iota by trying to claims others are lying,
you are sadly mistaken. Even the other pro-lifers acknowledge you are
incredibly dishonest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 08:33:26 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's
right to choose?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 08:34:55 PM |
|
|
In article <Fv2dnTqhda6yRIzdRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately 75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's
right to choose?
Is that the standard you live by? You are a known liar. Why would I
be concerned about what you say?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 08:54:51 PM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041834552756%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Fv2dnTqhda6yRIzdRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support
for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election
year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more
are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately
75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions
applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's
right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your
lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a
woman's
right to choose?
Is that the standard you live by? You are a known liar. Why would I
be concerned about what you say?
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's right
to choose?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Me" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 10:19:43 PM |
|
|
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's right
to choose?
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 08:05:03 AM |
|
|
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-BE8D9D.23194323012004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's
right
to choose?
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES right
to ANY legal choice.
I also have said, I don't agree with the choice to abort.
Or are you going to say that I have to agree with the choice?
David has said that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 09:37:11 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 09:45:30 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:buu3f6$7nu$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES
right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
Not all abortions
Unfortunately people like you could care less if a woman aborts at 1 month
or 8 months
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 09:46:30 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES
right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
Not all abortions
Gesundheit.
Unfortunately people like you could care less if a woman aborts at 1 month
or 8 months
What happened to you to make you such a hate-filled liar?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 09:55:06 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:buu40m$8ba$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES
right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
Not all abortions
Gesundheit.
Unfortunately people like you could care less if a woman aborts at 1
month
or 8 months
What happened to you to make you such a hate-filled liar?
Why don't you care about a fetus being aborted at any stage?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 10:37:31 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support EVERYONES
right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
Not all abortions
Gesundheit.
Unfortunately people like you could care less if a woman aborts at 1
month
or 8 months
What happened to you to make you such a hate-filled liar?
Why don't you care about a fetus being aborted at any stage?
Why haven't you stopped molesting children?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 10:45:04 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:buu70a$b09$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Yes, and I have ALWAYS said that. As I have said I support
EVERYONES
right
to ANY legal choice.
Even the most rabid anti-choicer is willing to allow women the right
to "legal" choices.
They just don't want abortion to ever be a legal choice.
Not all abortions
Gesundheit.
Unfortunately people like you could care less if a woman aborts at 1
month
or 8 months
What happened to you to make you such a hate-filled liar?
Why don't you care about a fetus being aborted at any stage?
Why haven't you stopped molesting children?
Why haven't you stopped raping women and forcing them to abort?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 10:23:11 PM |
|
|
In article <srhi-BE8D9D.23194323012004@news-60.giganews.com>, Me
<srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>,
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's right
to choose?
Are you willing to say now that you agree that women have
the right to decide if they have an abortion and that it is
none of your business how they chose? Yes, or no?
Do you really expect him to answer? He doesn't live by his own rules.
Imagine life as his child....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 09:07:21 PM |
|
|
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041834552756%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Fv2dnTqhda6yRIzdRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from support
for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election
year.
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and more
are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken, approximately
75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions
applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a woman's
right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your
lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a
woman's
right to choose?
Is that the standard you live by? You are a known liar. Why would I
be concerned about what you say?
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's right
to choose?
Ask me again...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 08:02:22 AM |
|
|
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041907219493%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041834552756%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Fv2dnTqhda6yRIzdRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>,
osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from
support
for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a
political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election
year.
at
http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and
more
are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken,
approximately
75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions
applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right
to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a
woman's
right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your
lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a
woman's
right to choose?
Is that the standard you live by? You are a known liar. Why would I
be concerned about what you say?
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's
right
to choose?
Ask me again...
So above, you make the statement that I am a lying piece of ***** claiming I
support a woman's right to choose, but when called upon you want to run
away.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
24 Jan 2004 08:05:18 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 09:02:22 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041907219493%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <EYmdnfu7rOKtQ4zdRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041834552756%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <Fv2dnTqhda6yRIzdRVn-sA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David Barnes" <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:230120041814409832%dbarnes111@yahoo.com...
In article <8912d58d.0401230414.18fa4214@posting.google.com>,
osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
David Barnes <dbarnes111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<220120042137150926%dbarnes111@yahoo.com>...
In article <uK6dnQlYEsY5rY3dRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Mike" <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cd3bf67d.0401221158.44f4f48f@posting.google.com...
Abortion foes battle on
The American public appears to be turning away from
support
for
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a
political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election
year.
at
http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
There was a HUGE rally for pro-life. It appears more and
more
are
turning
against abortion on demand. If I am not mistaken,
approximately
75%
of
the
U.S. feels abortion should be regulated, and restrictions
applied.
Another victory for pro-life
Another defeat for pro-abortion
But the lying piece of ***** claims he supports a womans right
to
choose.
Can you show any evidence to state that I don't support a
woman's
right
to
choose?
Or are you going to be the one caught in yet another one of your
lies?
I've never been "caught in a lie," and certainly not by you.
So then you are willing to admit that I never said I don't support a
woman's
right to choose?
Is that the standard you live by? You are a known liar. Why would I
be concerned about what you say?
Are you willing to admit that I never said I don't support a woman's
right
to choose?
Ask me again...
So above, you make the statement that I am a lying piece of ***** claiming I
support a woman's right to choose...
But you made the admission to the affect you support people's right to
make their own legal choices. Does that exclude pregnant women?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
22 Jan 2004 11:27:02 PM |
|
|
Mike <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote:
at http://www.washtimes.com/culture/20040120-095144-1339r.htm
The Washington Times is a right-wing propaganda mill for the Moonies.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
22 Jan 2004 05:58:39 PM |
|
|
On 22 Jan 2004 11:58:23 -0800,
Mike <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote:
Abortion foes battle on.
Fruitlessly, fortunately. What a collection of ludicrous losers!
The American public appears to be turning away from support
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at...
Forget it. The Washington Times is a bias-saturated and hateful,
RRR-cult-oriented RAG.
And it's "abortion-upon-REQUEST," not demand. And that's just
the way it will ALWAYS be, forever more. The Pro-Choice majority will
always make sure of that. Abortion bans have the SAME chance of
ever returning as slavery and segrefation does. For the SAME reasons.
People like you need to take up something WORTHWHILE. Like,
perhaps, stamp collecting.
It'd be FAR less a waste of your time.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dori" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 02:25:17 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<401061a8.351484@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 22 Jan 2004 11:58:23 -0800,
Mike <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote:
Abortion foes battle on.
Fruitlessly, fortunately. What a collection of ludicrous losers!
The American public appears to be turning away from support
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at...
Forget it. The Washington Times is a bias-saturated and hateful,
RRR-cult-oriented RAG.
And it's "abortion-upon-REQUEST," not demand. And that's just
the way it will ALWAYS be, forever more. The Pro-Choice majority will
always make sure of that. Abortion bans have the SAME chance of
ever returning as slavery and segrefation does. For the SAME reasons.
People like you need to take up something WORTHWHILE. Like,
perhaps, stamp collecting.
It'd be FAR less a waste of your time.
-- Craig Chilton < >
Anything that a MAN has a say in an argument about abortion is
meaningless. Just shut up. It's not your business.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: "Abortion foes battle on" |
23 Jan 2004 09:56:48 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jan 2004 12:25:17 -0800,
Dori <dori_duz@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Mike <yared22311@yahoo.com> wrote:
Abortion foes battle on.
Fruitlessly, fortunately. What a collection of ludicrous losers!
The American public appears to be turning away from support
abortion on demand, but the issue promises to be a political,
legislative and cultural battleground again this election year.
at...
Forget it. The Washington Times is a bias-saturated and hateful,
RRR-cult-oriented RAG.
And it's "abortion-upon-REQUEST," not demand. And that's just
the way it will ALWAYS be, forever more. The Pro-Choice majority will
always make sure of that. Abortion bans have the SAME chance of
ever returning as slavery and segrefation does. For the SAME reasons.
People like you need to take up something WORTHWHILE.
Like, perhaps, stamp collecting.
It'd be FAR less a waste of your time.
Anything that a MAN has a say in an argument about
abortion is meaningless. Just shut up. It's not your business.
When I was a white Civil Rights activist in Mississippi in 1963,
I'd have been stunned if any of the blacks whose RIGHTS I was
working so hard -- as an egalitarian ALLY -- to defend, had come
up to me and said:
"Anything that a WHITE person has a say in an argument about
segregation is meaningless. Just shut up. It's not your business."
Now, Dori -- did you REALLY mean what you just said?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
