Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

=== Re-posted for the edification of Frank Dwyer, to the
groups in which he and I were having a discussion. ===

That's real nice Craig, but why bothing to make 4 posts of it
one right after another?

Your being ignorant enough to side with the loathsome and
anti-social agendas of the RRR cult makes it not a bit surprising
that your limited reading comprehension kept you from noticing
that each of those posts presented a DIFFERENT scenario...
and that each had only the introductory commentary in common.

Hey, I'm big enough to admit being wrong the few times that I am
actually wrong. I admit that I didn't even read them all because they
looked very similar... and as with almost all the the stuff you post,
were filled with crap.

...and as with almost all the the stuff you post, were filled with crap.

Updated BACKGROUND ---

Keystone Kops "terrorists" are a JOKE!
**Real** terrorists may very well not even EXIST.

Who knows what group of klowns has caused it, but compared
to *real* terrorists -- which seem more and more to be nonexistent
bogeymen -- some inept terrorist wanna-bes have managed to
fleetingly (as in, or only one day, in that resilient city) disrupt
London
on 7/7/05 by killing and injuring a handful of people in the city's
transportation system.

Yes -- I did say "handful.," because compared to what some
slightly more serious terrorists did in Madrid, Spain, 911 days after
"9/11," the London attacks comprised a tempest in a teapot.

And even Madrid was NOTHING compared to what **real**
terrorists could accomplish -- IF they were serious. Or even really
existed. Which they very well may not. We'll call those hypothetical
terrorists, "MAXI-Terrorists," vis-a-vis the "MINI-Terrorists" that are
all that the world has experienced to date.

REAL terrorists would be playing out such scenarios as dumping
anthrax from the tops of skyscrapers... spreading smallpox via aerosol
spray in busy world airports... perhaps playing out a scenario like the
"Santa Ana Firestorm" one (described below) that I speculated on
a month after 9/11, and which Hal Lindsey apparently saw and then
related in his TBN TV broadcast... or setting off a smuggled A-Bomb
or H-Bomb in a major city.

Today's ACTUAL would-be terrorists -- the MINI-Terrorists -- are
nothing but a sick JOKE!

NOT, of course, to that handful of victims of their vicious,
criminal,
and unconscionable acts in London, on July 7th, or to their families
and friends. And of course, just as happened after 9/11 and Madrid,
our hearts go out to them. ONE person killed or injured in so pointless
and despicable a manner is one too many.

But *Israelis* today, while no doubt also feeling that way about
this,
probably also are going "Ho-hum," as they recall the worse such very
prolonged siege that has played out almost routinely in their nation for
years. And things are worse *yet* in the Iraq-That-Bush-Made.

As this is written (on 7/8/05), we don't know who is responsible for
these loathsome attacks in London. But we will learn. And then it's
most important that overreaction in the form of nonsensical "Patriot
Acts," etc., which deprive NON-terrorists of legitimate rights, NOT be
allowed to occur, and erode any free nation's liberties.

On Oct. 30, 2001 (around 7 weeks after the 9/11 attacks, I posted
this in Usenet:

A couple of weeks ago, I responded to a government
request to all Americans (which was particularly targeted
to creative writers) for possible scenarios that terrorists
might employ. So far, I've come up with five... (1) The
"Powdered-Anthrax Dispersion from windows of tall build-
ings in multiple cities, simultaneously," scenario... (2) The
"Initiation of Nv CJD (New variant Creuzfeld Jacob Disease;
also spelled, "New variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease") into
meat distribution centers" scenario... (3) The "Simultaneous
Introduction of Hoof-and-Mouth Disease into beef cattle
ranches and dairy farms, nationwide" scenario... (4) The
"Smallpox-Dispersal at Hartsfield and O'Hare Airports"
(outside the secure areas) scenario... and (5) The
"Santa-Ana-Wind-Impelled Firestorm" scenario.

Three of these (except the Anthrax Dispersion one, and
the Hoof-and-Mouth Disease one, for which I could think
of no feasible defenses) included my suggestions for
possible defensive counter-measures that could be taken.

When one realizes what the terrorists COULD do, with
far less planning and personal risk/suicide, the Sept. 11th
attack PALES by comparison.

Some of these are presented herein, in different order from
the above. I just presented the first, in a different post -- "The
Santa Ana Wind-Impelled Firestorm" scenario. The next in this
series of scenarios that could be carried out by the apparently-
nonexistent NAXI-Terrorists is the following:

MAXI-Terrorist Scenario #4

"Smallpox-Dispersal via Aerosol
at Hartsfield and O'Hare Airports"

This is another *easy* scenario to envision and describe,
but -- again -- not the easiest for Maxi-Terrorists to carry out.
(That dubious "honor" goes to the "Santa Ana Winds-Impelled
Firestorm" one.)

In this one, the Maxi-Terrorists would need to obtain a
quantity of the smallpox pathogen, and then package it into
small, easily-concealable-under-clothing aerosol-dispersion
devices, without compromising the potency of the pathogen.
After THAT, it would be pretty easy for them to implement the
scenario.

Without even needing to attempt to pass through security,
or enter a plane, each Maxi-Terrorist would need only to acti-
vate the silent dispersal device while walking through a densely-
crowded area -- such as the long lines at some of the ticket
counters. In that case, hitting several different lines, so that the
infected people could be flying to points all over the world.

That would be a piece of cake from *either* the Atlanta or
Chicago airports. Doubly effective if done at both at once,
or if New York and LAX were to be included in their effort.

Within days, there would be a worldwide smallpox pandemic,
for which 'WAY too little vaccine would even exist. It would
be unstoppable, and could kill hundreds of millions, randomly,
worldwide. That would **truly** be MAXI-Terrorism.

= = = = = = =

Even though today's breed of Mini-Terrorists appear to
be DOLTS (as evidenced by their apparent inability to accom-
plish any sort of MASS damage, despite their apparent dedica-
tion, the above scenario almost surely has occurred to them.
So what's puzzling is the inexplicable question -- What deters
today's MINI-Terrorists from being MAXI-Terrorists? We can
all be thankful that they DO appear to be that gutless, but
since the penalty if they were to be captured probably would
be the same either way, one must wonder *what* is deterring
them. (???)

Here in these newsgroups, we participants can probably
come up with many OTHER scenarios to fulfill the military's
request for ideas. I encourage you to do with them as I have
done, and simultaneously e-mail your concepts to Secretary
of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld at:

http://www.defenselink.mil/faq/comment.html

Your concept can be entered on a form provided on that
page, and e-mailed directly from that website. (You might have
to make a few mouseclicks; that page morphs a lot.)

Meanwhile, others in these Usenet groups can consider
these concepts, and expand on the possibilities, in a HUGE
electronic "brainstorming" session on-line.

(I'd like to think that this has happened to some degree,
but between 2002 and now, I've seen nothing but abject
APATHY in Usenet, in that regard, instead. Incredible!!)

Forewarned is forearmed, in such a war as this. Vigilance
is prudent, but overreaction is extreme, and the latter would no
doubt be celebrated by terrorists.

Unfortunately, though, thanks to our Congress, we ALSO
have been forewarned against overreacting out of paranoia, as
we saw happen in the case of the perfidious (and probably
UN-Constitutional on *many* levels. It NEEDS a good strong
Constitutional challenge to be launched at it, and taken to the
U.S. Supreme Court, on its more extreme provisions. So far,
those capable of challenging it seem to have been too GUT-
LESS to do it -- unfortunately.

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

(Anyone who may wish for me to see any response they make to
this, or any other of my posts, needs to ensure that alt.abortion
remains in the cross-posting list -- since I regularly monitor that
specific group. Thanks.)