Science > Abortion > Alan L. Keyes: Hysterectomy and NFP Equal Sodomy of NASA
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"biniohas" |
| Date: |
02 Sep 2004 09:51:41 AM |
| Object: |
Alan L. Keyes: Hysterectomy and NFP Equal Sodomy of NASA |
Distillation or DOOM
Will it begin on October 5, 2004?
By Ambassador Alan L. Keyes
Eagle Forum
Why could this day be the beginning of death; of destruction?
This is not about a prophesy. The information contained herein is an
evaluation of historical occurrences that will be coupled with
culminating events --scheduled to take place on October 5, 2004-- that
could be considered by God as the final straw which will set off His
wrath.
THE EVENTS:
Sin entered the world when man (Adam) listened –acted upon without due
evaluation– to woman (Eve). By natural ability and by order of
creation man has the responsibility of decision making and leadership.
(The angel spoke to Mary concerning the bearing of a child, but spoke
to Joseph concerning the affairs of the family.) Man is called upon to
evaluate situations and to make determinations as to what is best for
those concerned regarding the present and the future. Among man's
greater life challenges is avoidance of being mesmerized by woman's
charm into accepting her presentations without due reflection in
regard to their real and moral value. Man has a special calling to
discern truth and justice and then to place learned values into
perspective.
Men should respect women for who and what they are, particularly for
their capacity of motherhood. Because of men's ineptitude in working
with women and failure to take care of their own responsibilities,
women for the most part are now out of control. Neither men nor women
any longer have a real relationship with God because of failure to
accept their assigned duties. Men deal neither honorably nor
responsibly toward women. And, women no longer have proper respect for
either men or themselves. Uncontrolled women become progressively more
destructive to themselves, their children, and the whole of society.
Their desires are never satiated.
The primal commandment of God to the human race was and is, "Be
fertile and multiply" (Gn. 1:28; 9:1). True monotheists believe in the
universal God, not just a planetary God. God is believed to be
unlimited and to have all knowledge, full understanding, and complete
wisdom in regard to what humans refer to as past, present, and future.
It has long been my belief that we humans are meant to populate or at
least travel throughout the universe and teach the Word of God to the
whole of creation. The need for population growth is astronomical. It
should therefore be understood that every sensual sexual act which in
anticipation or as a consequence is in opposition to procreation is
contrary to God's will. Also included would be avoidance of copulation
by married couples when the primary motive is derived from a
contraceptive mentality.
We know that during the time of Abraham the term sodomy came from
sexual practices in the region of Sodom and Gomorrah. These practices
were not conducive to procreation. However, the general concept of
sodomy has heretofore been quite limited. The essence of the evil of
an act of sodomy exists in the non-procreativity of selfish sexual
pleasuring, an offense against the primal commandment. (NOTE: A person
with homosexual orientation should not automatically be considered a
sodomite any more than a heterosexual should automatically be
considered a fornicator or an adulterer. Chastity –abstention from
immoral/unlawful sexual intercourse– is to be practiced by everyone
regardless of orientation or marital status.)
Is there a substantive problem with accepting that an active
contraceptive mentality is a graver sin than the mass murder of
multitudes of innocent unborn children? Aborted children, if one
believes in a truly "just" God, will somehow be given an opportunity
to share eternal life with God in Heaven. Non-existent –never
conceived-- children can never have the opportunity to be in Heaven
with God. God's desire is to have as many intelligent beings (the soul
is the seat of spiritual intelligence) share in eternal life that will
accept Him for who and what He is, on His terms. In justice, every
created human will be given an opportunity either to accept or to
reject Him.
Should it not be said that any sexual act which is intentionally
non-procreative is a sin of sodomy, or worse? A standard sodomite --if
this can be considered acceptable phraseology-- does not normally have
the intention of being non-procreative, but, the practical effect of
non-procreativity was still considered as a grave enough sin to bring
the hand of God upon the region of Sodom. What then can be said for
those who intentionally are offensive to the primal commandment. Are
they not committing a much graver form of sodomy? If sodomy were to be
categorized into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and perhaps 4th degrees, which form of
sodomy should be classified as the most offensive to God?
Other forms of sodomy would include but not necessarily be limited to
the following:
* Hysterectomies - This is surgical removal of the female
reproductive system. While often it is done for valid reasons, it is
also done because of a doctor's desire to sterilize, or an
individual's desire for sterilization. At times it is recommended by a
doctor as a means for financial gain. This procedure is
non-reversible.
* Vasectomy - A surgical procedure which severs or removes part or
all of a male's vas deferens. Within limitations this can often be
reversed. As an opinion it is morally obligatory for a repentant
sinner to make at least one effort at having a reversible
sterilization operation undone. (NOTE: As with all forms of abuse of
the male and female procreative systems, regardless of means used,
there are often medical complications such as cancer. A United Press
article, July 4, 1997, referred to a prior article on the fact that
San Francisco Bay –a region of very high promiscuity-- women have the
highest rate of breast cancer in the United States and possibly in the
world. Stanford University researchers now believe it's
lifestyle-related. They report that San Franciscan women have fewer
children and breast feed those children much less frequently.)
* Tubal ligation - the severing or tying of a females tubes. This
procedure is often reversible when the operation is performed by a
competent specialist. When and while there is a real financial problem
this may not be morally required.
* Mutual masturbation, oral, and anal sex.
* Using a male or female condom, a diaphragm, spermicide, or any
method which by desire has the effect of preventing conception. Sin
exists in the intention as well as in the accomplishment.
* Using an IUD or a chemical substance which prevents implantation
is always an instrument of murder. The use thereof has the dual effect
of being both murder and sodomy whether by fact or intention.
* Birth control pills and other chemical substances which either
act as an abortifacient or have the effect of preventing conception.
(NOTE: Continual usage of birth control pills should be considered as
having produced one or more abortions and any usage would subject a
knowledgeable Catholic to automatic excommunication as an abortion
could have taken place. So called low dosage birth control pills which
are now popularly used cause abortions at a substantially higher rate
than previously available high dosage pills.)
* Bestiality - any type of sexual relationship or satisfaction
with an animal. (A recent news article states that themes of three
current novels by top selling authors from Denmark, France, and
England respectively have a common fascination with serious crossbreed
love. That "coupling out" –romance with animals– is in. The French
novel shot to the top of the bestseller list and was quickly
translated into English. The descriptions given, about the contents of
the novels, are too vile to repeat. The news article stated that
Sigmund Freud dominated the 20th-century, and that maybe now it was
Charles Darwin's turn. A proofreader of this article states that
bestiality is being taught in some Public Schools --including to
Kindergarten kids-- and has been for several years.)
* NFP - Any method of what is referred to as Natural Family
Planning can be and often is another form of sodomy. NFP uses the
natural rhythms of a woman's cycle to determine when she is fertile.
Abstinence is then practiced until she has completed her period of
fertility. While there are a limited number of approved reasons for
using NFP, any time it is used with the contraceptive mentality it
equates with an act of sodomy.
* Accomplices - Anyone promoting or otherwise assisting either as
a means or as a consequence the avoidance of pregnancy is an
accomplice in each act of sodomy which follows. This includes
ministers and priests of all ranks who promote birth control (act) in
whatever fashion, or who fail to teach against it (omission) as they
are morally obliged to do regardless of religious belief. Politicians
and government agencies who have legalized, or who promote and even
pay for birth control procedures, are also high on the list of
accomplices in sodomy. Also included as accomplices are media personal
-owners, management, and staff-- who in any way promote birth or
population control. (NOTE: Birth control is both offensive to nature
and to God's primal command.)
"A woman's salvation is through the bearing of children..." 1 Timothy
2:15 -- (This of course would only apply to non-sterile --sterility of
husband included-- lawfully married women and to fornicators.) Note
that the term "children" is in the plural. Add to this the term
"multiply" from the primal commandment. Merely increasing or adding to
the population is not sufficient. CONSIDER: Doesn't two times two and
two plus two give the same result? Two times three might be seen as
fulfilling the letter of the law, but wouldn't a spiritual person want
to more than just fulfill the minimal requirement of law? The average
woman, even allowing for the full potential of the natural spacing of
breast feeding, easily would have eight or more children during her
child bearing years. (The current record, according to Guinness
Records, is sixty-nine for one woman. Unofficially there is one woman
in South America who is said to have had about 73 children and is
still married to the one who is the father of all of her children. He
is a janitor of very modest means.)
When the above is placed in conjunction with the Biblical admonition
against having sexual intercourse from the onset of menses to what is
normally the early part of a woman's fertility period, it should
become quite clear that procreation is extremely important to our God
of unlimited capacity. It might also be noted that by nature women,
rather they realize it or not, generally are more friendly, somewhat
more flirtatious or approachable during their fertile period of
approximately nine days.
The universe has tremendous capacity to absorb trillions of times the
present population of Earth. Joining the concept of the unlimited
capacity of the universe with the primal commandment of God should
cause anyone to have serious concern regarding the almost unrestrained
practices of birth control which in effect are graver than acts of
common sodomy or abortion.
* Scripture tells of a woman named Tamar. Her second husband,
Onan, was killed by God because he practiced a particularly evil form
of sodomy referred to as onanism. Tamar wanted to have children, but
whenever Onan had sexual intercourse with her he would withdraw from
her spilling his seed on the ground. God took his life for wasting
life-giving seed. (Gn. 38:9f)
Tamar's first husband, Onan's older brother, was Er. The crime for
which God took his life is not specified in Scripture. The crime was
considered so heinous that it was not to be formally acknowledged. The
all-knowing God understood that others might then be tempted to also
act in this fashion. Today what is believed to be this unmentionable
crime is now altogether too commonly practiced. All sodomy is opposed
to God's will, but most detestable of all could be the practice of
oral and anal intercourse by a husband and wife. Er's intention to
have oral or anal sex may have been sufficient to cause God's wrath,
for it is certain that Tamar wanted children.
How often must God give messages to the human race? In this life it is
not God's practice to punish each and every offense. Biblical history
however clearly demonstrates that He will only let evil progress so
far. At some point when the elect get too intractable God steps in
with corrective discipline. The necessary discipline would be severe
and include numerous deaths and much destruction. Until the very final
days of human existence this pattern can be expected to continue. God
placed man in charge of worldly affairs and expects him to do whatever
is necessary to insure justice according to His will.
Other signs of the existence of great moral decay in the Church and in
the world:
* Supreme Court Justice William Brennan, a liberal who voted
pro-abortion in the Supreme Court decision of Roe vs. Wade, was given
a Catholic funeral Mass at St. Matthew's Cathedral in Washington, D.C.
There has been no public indication that he ever repented of his evil
act. He can only be understood to have been a direct participant in
the crime of abortion murder and was therefore under the penalty of
automatic excommunication. The use of the Cathedral makes Archbishop
James Cardinal Hickey guilty of grave scandal and a participant in
procured abortions from that day forward, if he had not already been
accountable as an accomplice. A great opportunity to publicly
repudiate the crime of abortion has been lost.
* Fashion designer Gianni Versace, a well known sodomite, has been
twice honored by the Catholic Church with memorial Masses. First at
St. Patrick's in Miami Beach, Florida at a Mass presided over by
Auxiliary Bishop Augustin Roman. At the Mass Versace was remembered as
a man who lived life with gusto and brought pleasure to many. A Rev.
Patrick O'Neil is quoted as having said, "It was a splendid life."
Versace was said to be a leading light of Miami Beach, a trendy area
of night clubs, cafes, modeling agencies and art deco hotels popular
with fun-seekers from around the world and home to a large gay
community. Versace's recent male companion was Antonio d'Amico.
* The second memorial Mass for Versace was held in Milan, Italy's
600-year-old gothic cathedral. It was presided over by the Cathedral's
rector, the Rev. Angelo Majo. Many celebrities were in attendance
including Elton John, Sting, Princess Diana, and Carolyn Bessette
Kennedy, wife of John F. Kennedy, Jr. Celebrities that had been
dressed by Versace included Madonna, Elton John, Courtney Love, Demi
Moore, Boy George, Elizabeth Hurley and Princess Diana, as well as
most every supermodel. Princess Diana wore to the Mass a black
sleeveless, knee-length dress and white pearls, black tights and black
high-heeled shoes. At this time she said nothing to reporters but
earlier had said she was devastated by his murder. The designer had
named a handbag after her – the Lady Di.
* Female Sex Toys - In the September 2003 issue of a magazine,
having a goal of giving an international view of the world, was an
article in the business section entitled, "Selling Sex Toys to Women."
The article developed the theme that the selling of these objects in
England was now quite common and were to be found in local stores. The
article stated however that they were not yet deemed suitable for
front counter display. Another well established method of selling of
sex toys was to have women promote their sales at what is the
equivalent of "Tupperware Parties" in the United States. The company
promoting talking vibrators, nipple tassels, fish net stockings,
naughty nickers and bras among other things is now among Britain's top
250 most profitable companies. The company, now run by women, largely
sells to women, and employs 7,000 women to run its Tupperware-style
women only parties.
* Twenty years ago 9,000 people in Birmingham, England voted
against having a Porn Shop --as described above-- and 27 said they
did. Twenty years later the 27 became the majority. In 1996 women
bought approximately 400,000 vibrators, 450,000 naughty nickers, and
650,000 (naughty?) Bras. The parties illustrate the success of
feminism. They also indicate the growth of immorality among women when
they are left to their own devices.
Recently when speaking with a doctor friend of mine, I learned that
these Tupperware-style parties are also common in the United States.
Women are pushing to promote immoral products and it is not just the
sales women who are doing the pushing. It is an enduring quality of
Satan to get others to do his dirty work for him. Satan has gotten
millions of mindless immoral women involved in evil, and the numbers
are increasing. The parties are a success for feminism.
Men who ogle women are as mindless as they are. Though both men and
women are gravely guilty of sin, men have the greater moral
responsibility in bringing it to an end. NOTE: Last year Americans
spent $8 Billion on pornography and sex toys. Though a grave evil,
drugs are not responsible for the moral decay which has occurred in
Christian countries. Lack of leadership together with lack of desire
for leadership is responsible for moral decay. Few will risk being
scorned as Jesus was.
* Editorial Page editor, Frances Coleman --of the Mobile Register,
Mobile, Alabama– stated in her column on June 22, 1997, "As a
Catholic, I know something about what can happen when a church
hierarchy urges people to do something they don't want to do. The year
was 1967. Giovanni Battista Montini – Pope Paul VI – had been bishop
of Rome for only a few years when he issued his encyclical, Humanae
Vitae ("Of Human Life"). In it he condemned artificial birth control
and admonished his Catholic flock that marital sex must be open to
procreation."
"In the past, that teaching had been widely accepted among Catholics.
...."
"Who embraced "the pill"? Just about everybody, including Catholics,
and no stern words from Rome could stop them. By the mid-1990's,
surveys showed that more than three-fourths of Catholic couples were
using artificial birth control."
"Catholics don't take birth control pills out of a sense of defiance.
Nor will Southern Baptists continue to patronize Disney products out
of a sense of defiance. They will do it because they want to."
"It's the same reason I have two children instead of five, 10 or 12 –
and it's the reason the Disney boycott is destined to fail."
COMMENT: Ms. Coleman (the term Ms. is herein used as a derogatory
reference) errs when she states that encyclicals urge people to do –or
not do– something they don't --or do-- want to do. Encyclicals such as
Humanae Vitae instruct people on what is morally right or wrong. Their
purpose is to help people decide whether (in effect) they want to go
to Heaven or to Hell. Ms. Coleman –now an admitted sodomite– has now
publicly stated that she wants to go to Hell. That is her Choice. Her
bishop, Archbishop Oscar H. Lipscomb, by not publicly admonishing her
has illustrated his intention of joining her in Hell.
* A worldwide trend? - A record high 120,000 women in Bulgaria had
an abortion in the first five months of 1996, Trud and Kontinent
reported on 26 June, of which 100,000 were legal and the rest illegal.
According to official data, 150,000 pregnancies were interrupted in
1995, while only 72,000 babies were born. This means that almost 2.1
babies were murdered in 1995 for every one baby that was allowed to
live. Worldwide the ratio of children not allowed to have existence,
by reason of sodomy, is far greater. The average mother in the United
States has 2.0 children, in Japan 1.4 children, in Italy 1.3 children,
and in Hong Kong and Spain 1.2 children. Women now want careers. They
find raising children to be too time consuming. The time and cost of
child rearing they would rather use to fulfill their personal desires.
* The People's Princess - Early in the morning of August 30, 1997
Princess Diana was killed in a high speed automobile accident. Many
millions of people around the world were in grief and mourned her
death. Tens of thousands have presented flowers in her honor. She has
received one of the largest funeral parades and ceremonies in the
history of England. It is believed that half of the world's population
watched the televised events of her funeral. Her final resting place
is expected to become a major tourist attraction. It is said that she
is loved by all, but why? Was she the type of moral person that
children should look up to and emulate? Did she associate with
wholesome people?
As stated above she was a close friend of the well known sodomite
Gianni Versace who was killed by the gigolo sodomite and prostitute
Andrew Cunanan. Hillary Rodam Clinton –a lover of sodomites-- uses
deep personal association with Princess Diane as the reason for
attending Princess Diane's funeral in England. While association does
not make one guilty of sin, it does bring into question of whether she
was a person who exercised good judgement. She was also an admitted
adulteress. Perhaps to some degree she should not have full blame as
her husband had apparently been an adulterer for many years.
Another question that might be examined is just how Christian was she?
It is known that she had attempted suicide. News or television reports
were noticeably lacking in reports of her being a person active in
faith. Indeed it is said that she looked for peace in Eastern
philosophy, astrology and meditation, yet her funeral ceremonies where
that of the church of England, the Anglican Church.
"But if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the
law as transgressors. For whoever keeps the whole law, but falls short
in one particular, has become guilty in respect to all of it." (Jam
2:9f)
* Our mindless hedonistic society seems to be in love with those
who sin. It seems that the more notorious the person the greater the
partiality that is shown toward them and the higher they are placed
upon the imaginary pedestal. Many great sinners, for all practical
purposes, receive greater admiration and worship than God. The goddess
of adultery, Elizabeth Taylor, was given an opportunity to express her
admiration of Princess Di and to condemn the paparazzi on television.
Three of the better known public sinners are Elvis Presley, Marilyn
Monroe, and Erwin "Magic" Johnson, the basketball hero who tested
positive for HIV, November 7, 1991, and acknowledged having had sex
with over 2,000 women.
COMMENT: As the years of legalized abortion continues to increase, the
disrespect for all human life increases. The above are illustrations
of the growing evil in the world that can only be said to be at the
top of the tip of the iceberg. Without immediate repentance and rapid
action against evil can anyone truly expect God to keep out of the
affairs of the world?
The Space Shuttle Disaster
2003 A.D. – Barbara Morgan, a New Event ?
The Challenger Event - On January 28, 1986, "Just 73 seconds after
liftoff, the space shuttle Challenger exploded, killing all seven
astronauts aboard." Why?
For those who believe that God is active in human affairs, and that
nothing happens without His permission, it would seem plausible to
look into the lives of those who were killed.
The Challenger Crew
Front row, from left, Michael Smith, Francis "*****'' Scobee and Ronald
McNair.
Back row, from left, Ellison Onizuka, Christa McAuliffe, Gregory
Jarvis and Judith A. Resnik.
It was a diverse space shuttle crew male, female, white, black,
Asian-American, Christian, and Jewish.
A brief look at the seven who died aboard Challenger ten years later
(1996):
1. Gregory Jarvis: Hughes Aircraft Co. engineer in Los Angeles. Age
41. Married. No children. First shuttle flight.
2. Christa McAuliffe: A schoolteacher in Concord, N.H., and first
private citizen chosen to fly in space. Age 37. Married in 1970. Two
children, now 16 and 19. First shuttle flight.
3. Ronald McNair: Second African-American in space, physicist from
Lake City, S.C. Age 35. Married. Two children, now 11 and 13. Karate
instructor, jazz saxophonist. Second shuttle flight.
4. Ellison Onizuka: First Asian-American in space, Air Force
lieutenant colonel from Kealakekua, Kona, Hawaii. Age 39. Married. Two
children, now 20 and 26. Second shuttle flight.
5. Judith Resnik: Second American woman in space, electrical
engineer from Akron, Ohio. Age 36. Divorced. No children. Jewish.
Classical pianist. Second shuttle flight.
6. Francis "*****" Scobee, commander: Former Air Force and combat
pilot from Cle Elum, Wash. Age 46. Married. Two children, now 31 and
34. Second shuttle flight.
7. Michael Smith, pilot: Navy captain and former combat pilot from
Beaufort, N.C. Age 40. Married. Three children, now 18, 24 and 27.
First shuttle flight.
COMMENT: Referring only to the above information it can be stated with
some degree of probability that six of the seven had been practicing
some form of birth control. This would mean –using prior definition–
that there may have been six sodomites who were terminated in the
"accident." Was this a warning from God? This type of tie-in is sure
to be unpopular, but what if it is true? As for the 7th man, if he was
in grace then he is saved and his family provided for according to
God's will.
Christa Corrigan McAuliffe
Sharon Christa Corrigan was born September 2, 1948 in Boston. Steven
McAuliffe and Christa, married in 1970, had two children, Scott
Corrigan born September 11, 1976 and Caroline Corrigan born August 24,
1979. It seems probable that Christa practiced birth control before,
between, and after having children. If this is true, and it probably
is, then Christa had joined other billions in acts of sodomy.
Christa was selected by NASA to impart the human side of space travel.
In her application, Christa said she would keep a journal in which she
would humanize the experience and share it with all who were
interested. She planned to teach a series of lessons to be broadcast
live from space. "Imagine me teaching from space, all over the world,
touching so many people's lives. That's a teacher's dream! I have a
vision of the world as a global village, a world without boundaries.
Imagine a history teacher making history!" Christa called her
impending trip on the Challenger "The Ultimate Field Trip." She said,
"This is a very exciting time in my life, 36 exciting years behind me,
36 more ahead of me."
COMMENTS: Ms. McAuliffe was wrong. She did not have 36 more years
ahead of her. She made a false presumption concerning the will of God.
She had not fulfilled her role as woman and she was attempting to act
as God had not intended. (1 Tim. 2:12 "I do not permit a woman to
teach or to have authority over a man. She must be quiet.") Not only
was she acting against the will of God by teaching (to the world) but
she had the intention of doing so from the heavens – which at least in
one sense is the location for the throne of God.
SUMMARY: Christa McAuliffe, a probable unrepentant sodomite who had
left the care of her young children in the hands of others, was
intending to publicly teach --something forbidden to women-- from what
had heretofore generally been considered as the realm of God.
Should women be teachers? Response to E-mail received 6 November 1997.
In recent years, following what is commonly referred to as the advent
of women's liberation, women have been seeking temporal sameness with
men. As part of this sameness many so-called religious women have
developed desires to be priestesses (as many of these believe in
sexual equality they prefer to use the male --or what they consider as
a sexless term-- reference, priest). Many if not most of these women
are active lesbians. Many or most priests and bishops supporting their
cause are no doubt of homosexual orientation. The strong probability
exists that at least some, if not most, are active sodomites.
Many priests and more to the point, some bishops, have bought into the
feminists' theology. It is known that some bishops have
surreptitiously held ordination ceremonies for some trained feminists.
These feminists and some bishops and priests believe these ordinations
to be valid. Because of natural differences and goals of men and
women, God, both in the Old and New Testaments, chose only males for
ordination. What God has placed into effect neither man nor woman can
change. Women have never been, cannot now be, and never will be
validly ordained. From recent reports it seems that some of these
invalidly ordained women are intending to celebrate "critical masses"
or "women's eucharists." The dissidents describe themselves as
"feminists within the Roman Catholic tradition." The critical masses
they intend are to be celebrated as a direct challenge to the
Vatican's statement that women cannot be ordained priests. (1 Cor.
14:34 "As in all the churches of the holy ones, women should keep
silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should
be subordinate, as even the law says.") No one who claims to be
Christian can accept women as ministers or as priests. Heavens doors
are closed to those with such beliefs.
Their statement said the ritual will include "elements of the
traditional Mass," with "an inclusive liturgy with women's vision at
its heart." These women-celebrated liturgies are scheduled to be
celebrated in Oakland, California and throughout Switzerland and
Germany on the same day.
COMMENT: Theologically educated women (many of whom are lesbian) who
are invalidly ordained are presuming to teach in various churches,
using unapproved liturgies designed according to their feminist
agenda, in defiance of the teachings of the Church in which they
profess to be members. They are planning on this collective defiant
event to take place on October 5, 1997. I believe these planned events
may well be the straw, the culminating event, which will bring down
God's wrath upon a sinful world. The Challenger event is believed to
have been a prelude warning event to which few, if any, paid
attention.
After all is said and done, it would be well to remember that no one
is forced or even asked to make a special effort to have children. God
is the author of life and should be allowed to be the determining
factor in whether a woman does, or does not conceive. The number of
children that any couple has should remain dependant upon God's will.
God provides for those who leave matters of procreation in His hands.
Trust in God and the acceptance of His will is necessary for
salvation. To act in any fashion to avoid children is offensive to God
and nature and is mortally sinful. Unnatural acts in order to have
children are also sinful. And, some of these acts –including but not
limited to fertilizing many ovum and discarding those considered
unsuitable– are also acts of murder.
Corporations and governments should look toward the future and promote
space science and development. Population growth has always been a
major factor in developing and the settlement of new frontiers. The
concept of population control should be officially anathematized. It
is highly offensive to the primal commandment of God, "Be fertile and
multiply." God the Father had Jesus, His Son, teach, suffer, and die
for the sake of His children.
Bar 1:21f "For we did not heed the voice of the Lord, our God, in all
the words of the prophets whom he sent us, but each of us went off
after the devices of our own wicked hearts, served other gods, and did
evil in the sight of the Lord, our God."
1 Cor. 6:9f "Do you not know that the unjust will not inherit the
kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators nor idolaters
nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor practicing homosexuals... will
inherit the kingdom of God."
Heb 10:38 "But my just one shall live by faith, and if he draws back
I take no pleasure in him."
James 5:19f "My brothers, if anyone among you should stray from the
truth and someone bring him back, he should know that whoever brings
back a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death
and will cover a multitude of sins."
.
|
|
| User: "ChuckPFb" |
|
| Title: Re: Alan L. Keyes: Hysterectomy and NFP Equal Sodomy of NASA |
02 Sep 2004 10:59:52 AM |
|
|
"biniohas" <biniohas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Distillation or DOOM
I'll vote for distillation. I like Jack Daniels.
Will it begin on October 5, 2004?
Yes, that's when the sky will fall. Chicken Little was right!
By Ambassador Alan L. Keyes
Why could this day be the beginning of death; of destruction?
Well, for death and destruction, one day is as good as the next.
Why not Oct. 5?
This is not about a prophesy.
Good for you, at least you won't embarrass yourself there...
The information contained herein is an
evaluation of historical occurrences that will be coupled with
culminating events --scheduled to take place on October 5, 2004-- that
could be considered by God as the final straw which will set off His
wrath.
Another nutcase who talks to God, eh?
Sin entered the world when man (Adam) listened -acted upon without due
evaluation- to woman (Eve).
Ancient Sumerian myth, of Babylonian origin. Probably crept into the literature
during Israel's Bablylonian captivitiy.
By natural ability and by order of
creation man has the responsibility of decision making and leadership.
No, that's just the propaganda created by patriarchal culture, which believes
the female is a type of sub-human, to be treated as a slave and as personal
property. Wives were commonly listed as property in the Old Testament.
(The angel spoke to Mary concerning the bearing of a child, but spoke
to Joseph concerning the affairs of the family.) Man is called upon to
evaluate situations and to make determinations as to what is best for
those concerned regarding the present and the future.
With the woman's inferior brain and temperament, she cannot be counted
on to make decisions. That's why it was not until nearly a century ago
that females were considered smart enough to vote in the USA.
Among man's
greater life challenges is avoidance of being mesmerized by woman's
charm into accepting her presentations without due reflection in
regard to their real and moral value.
Yeah, we rednecks call that being "***** whipped." There's the old
navy saying about towing a battleship with a small cord woven out of
female pubic hair. For shame!
Man has a special calling to
discern truth and justice and then to place learned values into
perspective.
Yeah, those stupid, pathetic women!
Men should respect women for who and what they are, particularly for
their capacity of motherhood.
Yeah, keep them barefoot and pregnant. One in 'em and one on 'em.
Because of men's ineptitude in working
with women and failure to take care of their own responsibilities,
women for the most part are now out of control.
Hehe! Wild wymin! I love it!
Neither men nor women
any longer have a real relationship with God because of failure to
accept their assigned duties.
Either that, or there's the possibility this God you speak of is either
a myth or wishes to have no further contact with humanity. He's been
gone for a long time, nobody's seen hide or hair of Him.
Men deal neither honorably nor responsibly toward women.
Yeah, these days all men want is sex!
And, women no longer have proper respect for either men or themselves.
Yeah, all women want now is sex!
Uncontrolled women become progressively more
destructive to themselves, their children, and the whole of society.
Their desires are never satiated.
All they want is sex and a comfortable lifestyle. Materialistic nyphomaniacs, all
of them!
The primal commandment of God to the human race was and is, "Be
fertile and multiply" (Gn. 1:28; 9:1). True monotheists believe in the
universal God, not just a planetary God. God is believed to be
unlimited and to have all knowledge, full understanding, and complete
wisdom in regard to what humans refer to as past, present, and future.
Yeah, lets overpopulate ourselves into oblivion. Use up all our natural
resources, the future of our children be damned.
It has long been my belief that we humans are meant to populate or at
least travel throughout the universe and teach the Word of God to the
whole of creation.
Oh great. Space faring fundies! Just what the universe needs! Ignoramuses
and trailer trash flying around in space ships!
The need for population growth is astronomical. It
should therefore be understood that every sensual sexual act which in
anticipation or as a consequence is in opposition to procreation is
contrary to God's will.
Ok. You're a troll, right, just like I am? You can't be serious with this
post. Surely nobody is *this* dumb.
Also included would be avoidance of copulation
by married couples when the primary motive is derived from a
contraceptive mentality.
Why not just do what JC commanded and cut off your penis?
We know that during the time of Abraham the term sodomy came from
sexual practices in the region of Sodom and Gomorrah.
If Sodomy is great fun, I wonder what Gomorrahy is like?
These practices
were not conducive to procreation. However, the general concept of
sodomy has heretofore been quite limited. The essence of the evil of
an act of sodomy exists in the non-procreativity of selfish sexual
pleasuring, an offense against the primal commandment. (NOTE: A person
with homosexual orientation should not automatically be considered a
sodomite any more than a heterosexual should automatically be
considered a fornicator or an adulterer. Chastity -abstention from
immoral/unlawful sexual intercourse- is to be practiced by everyone
regardless of orientation or marital status.)
How do thinking humans maintain the above ***** in their minds?
Talk about being a brainwashed cultie! Why not just cut your dicks off
and get over it?
Is there a substantive problem with accepting that an active
contraceptive mentality is a graver sin than the mass murder of
multitudes of innocent unborn children? Aborted children, if one
believes in a truly "just" God, will somehow be given an opportunity
to share eternal life with God in Heaven.
That's right. Since the way to heaven is a narrow gate and few be that
find it, the best way to send souls to heaven is to ***** like rabbits and
abort 'em all straight to paradise. But fundies would rather those
souls go to hell.
Non-existent -never
conceived-- children can never have the opportunity to be in Heaven
with God. God's desire is to have as many intelligent beings (the soul
is the seat of spiritual intelligence) share in eternal life that will
accept Him for who and what He is, on His terms. In justice, every
created human will be given an opportunity either to accept or to
reject Him.
This post is a troll, right? Are there really people around stupid enough
to believe the crap in this post?
Should it not be said that any sexual act which is intentionally
non-procreative is a sin of sodomy, or worse?
Who is anyone to judge?
A standard sodomite --if
this can be considered acceptable phraseology--
Would a standard sodomite be a heterosexual couple that enjoy anal
sex?
does not normally have
the intention of being non-procreative, but, the practical effect of
non-procreativity was still considered as a grave enough sin to bring
the hand of God upon the region of Sodom.
Read your bible, you drooling, slack-jawed slope headed moron. Do
a word search in an electronic bible and see what God's real complaint
was regarding Sodom. Gluttony was one of the main complaints.
John Haggee and family are all obvious Sodomites, as is Jerry Fallwell.
What then can be said for
those who intentionally are offensive to the primal commandment. Are
they not committing a much graver form of sodomy? If sodomy were to be
categorized into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and perhaps 4th degrees, which form of
sodomy should be classified as the most offensive to God?
I can't believe that the writer of this post, Keyes, is really serious. I'm just having
fun here trolling, surely this post I'm responding to is merely flame bait.
If so, my troll-o-meter is just about pegged. My stupid-o-meter is
also registering about the same.
Good post, even though it's written by Mr. Keyes, supposedly.
<smirk>
Other forms of sodomy would include but not necessarily be limited to
the following:
No way I can respond to all the rest of this outrageous garbage, there's
just too much of it. No way to outstink a dung heap!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gomorgy" |
|
| Title: Re: Alan L. Keyes: Hysterectomy and NFP Equal Sodomy of NASA |
03 Sep 2004 01:45:59 PM |
|
|
ChuckPFb wrote:
"biniohas" <biniohas@hotmail.com> wrote in message
<snip>
We know that during the time of Abraham the term sodomy came
from sexual practices in the region of Sodom and Gomorrah.
If Sodomy is great fun, I wonder what Gomorrahy is like?
According to the Gay & Black Glossary (
http://mindprod.com/ggloss/gomorrahy.html ), "gomorrahy" is "the
Canadian legal term for fisting (both vaginal and anal insertion of a
hand), footing (both vaginal and anal), and stumping (both vaginal and
anal insertion of an amputated stump)." In other words, gomorrahy -
a.k.a. the Sin of Gomorrah - is extremity insertion (it being understood
that the penis is no more an extremity than it is a middle leg).
Gomorgy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
