| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"hate feminism" |
| Date: |
26 Apr 2004 05:16:14 PM |
| Object: |
Among the Pagan Ladies |
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing. They, for example, used placards to
convey the lament that Barbara Bush hadn't killed her son in
the womb. "If Only Barbara Bush Had Choice," read one sign.
"Barbara Chose Poorly," read another. Marchers were also
disappointed that the Pope's mother hadn't killed him in the
womb. "The Pope's Mother Had No Choice," said a sign.
The repulsive heretic Francis Kissling of the sham
"Catholics for Free Choice" named the Pope as "the worst
enemy of choice." Kissling called the vile event on the
national mall a "sacred place," the "place to be, not the
churches."
One could call the Sunday march a festival of paganism, but
that's probably not fair to ancient pagans. Worshippers of
Baal would have regarded it as a little too depraved for
their taste. If C-SPAN covered the event, it must have had
to black and beep out much of it. It sounded like a
sustained FCC violation and many of the placards were too
baldly obscene (usually twisting the president and vice
presidents' names in various vulgar concoctions) for any
newspaper to report.
Not that the dominant media would report them anyway. No
doubt they will cast the march as mainstream and American as
apple pie, a reflection of widespread bourgeois dismay with
the Bush administration. But few families could be found in
this crowd. The march should have been renamed a "March for
Lesbians' Lives." A group called the "Lesbian avengers" were
out in force, as were "Christian Dykes for Choice." There
was an awful lot of talk about "reproductive rights" from
people not known for reproducing. Though to be fair, the
crowd was a bit more polymorphous than that. "Bisexual
Breeders for Choice" made an appearance.
Upset at the growing perception that they are godless
degenerates, marchers tried to wrap themselves in religion
as much as possible. Planned Parenthood now has a chaplain.
And march organizers cobbled together other phony religious
fronts for abortion, such as "Religious Coalition for
Reproductive Choice." "You don't own religion," one speaker
said to the "religious reich." A female rabbi appeared on
the podium to say that she was "pro-God, pro-choice." The
marchers know that God blesses the abortion of unborn
children because God is a woman. "I asked God. She's
pro-choice," was a popular sign. And they are now
theological enough to place Satan on the same ticket as
George Bush -- the "Bush/Satan" administration.
Separation-of-church-state advocate Barry Lynn, whom the
media insist on calling a "reverend" but is obviously a
fraud, also described the protest as a "hallowed space." But
though they wanted to turn God into an abortion activist and
enlist the support of as many churches and religions as
possible -- "Episcopalians for Choice," "This Is What a
Jewish Feminist Looks Like" were signs seen in the crowd --
the marchers could not resist certain anti-religious chants.
"Tax the church, tax the church" followed the attacks of
Kissling and others on the Pope and the Catholic Church.
The emcee of the event told the crowd that "I wanted to be
your dominatrix this morning." Then, before introducing
Hillary Clinton, she said, "Estrogen levels on this mall
have reached levels we enjoy." A blast of applause greeted
Clinton. She was in head-counting ward-boss mode, urging
marchers to vote for the Democratic ticket in the fall.
"Thank you, President Clinton," the emcee said to her when
she finished.
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate). Just as the marchers used "preachers" as props of
credibility, they dragooned children into service as well.
Children festooned with pro-abortion pins wandered around.
And then there were the "respectable elderly," old fools
marching with signs like "Another Granny for Choice."
The anti-globalization march from Saturday supplied a few
stragglers to fill out Sunday's march, as evident in the
numerous socialist booths set up on the mall. The two
marches melded well enough. Marchers equated "choice" not
just with abortion but with all the government programs they
seek. They don't simply want abortion permitted but also
paid for. Marchers called for "free abortion on demand" and
held signs saying "abortion rights, welfare rights." Bush
was blamed for all their woes. They even blamed "eugenics
and sterilization" on the Bush administration -- a topic
Margaret Sanger might have advised them to avoid.
George Neumayr is managing editor of The American Spectator.
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=6482
.
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
26 Apr 2004 05:57:03 PM |
|
|
In article <408D8A2E.208889D4@gfd.spam>, hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam>
wrote:
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing.
The march in Washington was about the right of women to do
with they want with their bodies where abortion is concerned.
Abortion has nothing to do with murder any more than heart
surgery does, no matter how you pro-slavers spin it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
26 Apr 2004 06:03:18 PM |
|
|
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:srhi-0C32E1.18570226042004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <408D8A2E.208889D4@gfd.spam>, hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam>
wrote:
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing.
The march in Washington was about the right of women to do
with they want with their bodies where abortion is concerned.
Abortion has nothing to do with murder any more than heart
surgery does, no matter how you pro-slavers spin it.
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
If she doesn't want to be a mother or isn't ready, she can choose to
abort and get out of it right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
27 Apr 2004 04:04:56 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
27 Apr 2004 04:10:43 PM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404271304.1c98306a@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 09:03:43 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby. This is talk.abortion, and this is
an abortion-related question. You claim that a pregnant woman has an
obligation to become a mother. What creates that obligation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 10:00:29 AM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am in this instance, we can get back to the other issue when you
back up
your claim.
Are you running from your claim now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 11:13:31 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:EvGdnan0mLmQWhLdRVn-ig@comcast.com...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am in this instance, we can get back to the other issue when you
back up your claim.
"You can lead an Ostrich to the facts, but you can't make him learn."
Are you running from your claim now?
LOL. Given the amount of time you spend 'running', Bobspammer, it's hard to
believe you aren't *alot* more slender than your pictures betray.
LC~Wondering why Heishman continues to play the same weak hand expecting
different results.
"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and
stupidity."~Harlan Ellison
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 07:45:44 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:EvGdnan0mLmQWhLdRVn-
ig@comcast.com:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am
of course you are. what choice does the abortion newsgroups most prolific
liar have but to change the subject?
"Apparently, you feel that if someone doesn't believe your lies,
that you should continue to screech them over and over in an
attempt to convince someone that what you're saying has any
value. This isn't kindergarten Asspry, and no matter how many
times you screech your lies, they will continue to BE lies."
(pr0r3p) writing to coward osprey (bobby
heishman) in <1686c3b8.0401271759.27fa1e9e@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spartakus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 01:09:09 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped
out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
This is talk.abortion, and this is an abortion-related question.
You claim that a pregnant woman has an obligation to become
a mother. What creates that obligation?
*** end restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Oh but I am in this instance,
because you don't want to answer a simple question?
we can get back to the other issue when you back up
your claim. Are you running from your claim now?
You're projecting, Bobby. Again. And you are in no position to ask
anyone else to back up their claims, since you don't back up yours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 01:16:09 PM |
|
|
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404281009.17d5ac04@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up
too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped
out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Not afraid at all to answer it. I am going back to what you are afraid to
answer, LONG before this issue came up.
Where is your evidence on your claim I smoke crack?
This is talk.abortion, and this is an abortion-related question.
You claim that a pregnant woman has an obligation to become
a mother. What creates that obligation?
*** end restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Oh but I am in this instance,
because you don't want to answer a simple question?
I have no problem answering it.
But your claim, and my question for you to back it up came LONG before this
and you have been
avoiding it every since.
So if you want to discuss this issue, we must resolve the previous issue
first.
Where is your evidence on your claim?
Are you going to retract it now that you know you can't back it up?
we can get back to the other issue when you back up
your claim. Are you running from your claim now?
You're projecting, Bobby. Again. And you are in no position to ask
anyone else to back up their claims, since you don't back up yours.
Your choice, run or admit you made a false claim.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 01:26:50 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:16:09 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404281009.17d5ac04@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up
too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped
out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Not afraid at all to answer it.
So answer it!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 11:01:55 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404281009.17d5ac04@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up
too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped
out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Not afraid at all to answer it.
Yes you are, little coward.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 07:47:40 PM |
|
|
(Spartakus) wrote in
news:6ed74dfa.0404281009.17d5ac04@posting.google.com:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" < > wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" < > wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up
too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you
snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
This is talk.abortion, and this is an abortion-related question.
You claim that a pregnant woman has an obligation to become
a mother. What creates that obligation?
*** end restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Oh but I am in this instance,
because you don't want to answer a simple question?
we can get back to the other issue when you back up
your claim. Are you running from your claim now?
You're projecting, Bobby. Again. And you are in no position to ask
anyone else to back up their claims, since you don't back up yours.
remember this?
"If you are going to make the claim, prove it. "
coward bobby heishman posting as osprey
news:8912d58d.0307090126.4a25ab87@posting.google.com:
can anyone remember coward bobby backing up anything he posted, ever?
"You're like the child who has cake all over his face, yet denies
having eaten the cake." (pr0r3p) writing to
coward osprey (bobby heishman)
in <1686c3b8.0401290731.17ace3b1@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 07:49:24 PM |
|
|
On 29 Apr 2004 00:47:40 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
spartakus@my-deja.com (Spartakus) wrote in
news:6ed74dfa.0404281009.17d5ac04@posting.google.com:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up
too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you
snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
*** begin restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
This is talk.abortion, and this is an abortion-related question.
You claim that a pregnant woman has an obligation to become
a mother. What creates that obligation?
*** end restoration of the question Bobby is afraid to answer ***
Oh but I am in this instance,
because you don't want to answer a simple question?
we can get back to the other issue when you back up
your claim. Are you running from your claim now?
You're projecting, Bobby. Again. And you are in no position to ask
anyone else to back up their claims, since you don't back up yours.
remember this?
"If you are going to make the claim, prove it. "
coward bobby heishman posting as osprey
news:8912d58d.0307090126.4a25ab87@posting.google.com:
can anyone remember coward bobby backing up anything he posted, ever?
Not ever.
"You're like the child who has cake all over his face, yet denies
having eaten the cake." (pr0r3p) writing to
coward osprey (bobby heishman)
in <1686c3b8.0401290731.17ace3b1@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 10:05:54 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:00:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am in this instance, we can get back to the other issue when you
back up
your claim.
Are you running from your claim now?
Why are you evading the question, osprey?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 10:18:02 PM |
|
|
MyTwoAngels <krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.spamu.com> writes:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:00:29 -0400, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract", We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out
anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am in this instance, we can get back to the other issue when you
back up your claim.
Are you running from your claim now?
Why are you evading the question, osprey?
What else does he know how to do? You're dealing with someone who has an 4004
brain in a Xeon world.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
28 Apr 2004 11:01:20 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:6ed74dfa.0404280603.6a04f426@posting.google.com...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
"Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com> wrote...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
You still have unanswered claims that you have made to answer up too.
When you are able to answer them, or do as you said.."Document or
retract",
We can take on this discussion. Most of which you snipped out anyway.
Lets start with your "crack" claim
Don't change the subject, Bobby.
Oh but I am in this instance, we can get back to the other issue when you
***** Heishman runs away like a little boy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bobby H. tries debating abortion rights |
27 Apr 2004 06:08:33 PM |
|
|
(Spartakus) wrote in
news:6ed74dfa.0404271304.1c98306a@posting.google.com:
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote...
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
What creates an obligation to be a mother?
i guarantee you that coward bobby will run away from thsi question.
"You're like the child who has cake all over his face, yet denies
having eaten the cake." (pr0r3p) writing to
coward osprey (bobby heishman)
in <1686c3b8.0401290731.17ace3b1@posting.google.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
26 Apr 2004 08:56:10 PM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam>
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing.
The march in Washington was about the right of women to do
with they want with their bodies where abortion is concerned.
Abortion has nothing to do with murder any more than heart
surgery does, no matter how you pro-slavers spin it.
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
Wrong, moron. It frees her from forced servitude.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 05:13:32 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:c6kejp$cq1$1@bolt.sonic.net
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
Wrong moron. It frees her from forced servitude.
If that's the wrong moron, which moron are you?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 05:15:20 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:56:10 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam>
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing.
The march in Washington was about the right of women to do
with they want with their bodies where abortion is concerned.
Abortion has nothing to do with murder any more than heart
surgery does, no matter how you pro-slavers spin it.
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
Wrong, moron. It frees her from forced servitude.
(Don't pay the imposter any mind.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 08:30:14 PM |
|
|
"MyTwoAngels" <krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.spamu.com> wrote in message
news:0lcs80ts08ff4ok9t2q0gl0iiqjlb2qc3o@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:56:10 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote:
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Shawn Hearn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam>
Among the Pagan Ladies
By George Neumayr
Published 4/26/2004 12:09:14 AM
WASHINGTON -- Sunday's "March for Women's Lives" made
maximum usage of euphemism, invoking "choice" whenever
marchers meant killing.
The march in Washington was about the right of women to do
with they want with their bodies where abortion is concerned.
Abortion has nothing to do with murder any more than heart
surgery does, no matter how you pro-slavers spin it.
Abortion frees a woman from obligation of being a mother right?
Wrong, moron. It frees her from forced servitude.
(Don't pay the imposter any mind.)
I can't figure out if the imposter 1) actually wishes he was a woman; 2)
impersonates you to give himself a veneer of class; or 3) actually believes
that we don't know the ***** of Keister Sore as soon as we see it.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Bernath" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 08:57:08 PM |
|
|
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy. Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 09:05:47 PM |
|
|
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy. Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years, primarily
due to education.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as many
pro-aborts use to believe.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some of the
issues like late term abortions.
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice, are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes beyond the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially in this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already addresses that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes enslaved and
is against equal choices and rights.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 09:40:07 PM |
|
|
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy. Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years, primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some of the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice, are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes beyond the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially in this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors found
out...)
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already addresses that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes enslaved and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 09:47:39 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420041940071028%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy. Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years,
primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some of
the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice, are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes beyond
the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly
threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the
pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially in
this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors found
out...)
Correcting yet again another one of David Barnes lies
David Barnes will lie as he is doing above to trick people into responding
to him.
No supervisors of mine were ever contacted. None of them have ever heard of
David
Barnes.
As far as the comments about Patrick Humphrey and David Barnes being
criminals, I have provided
state documentation with sources to back it up.
The comments Barnes makes about contacting supervisors is a flat out lie.
Challenged to him before to back up, only for him to run away making some
excuse.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already addresses
that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes enslaved
and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Among the Pagan Ladies |
27 Apr 2004 10:18:21 PM |
|
|
In article <2rudnV8VCaaThhLdRVn-tA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420041940071028%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy. Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years,
primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some of
the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice, are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes beyond
the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly
threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the
pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially in
this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors found
out...)
Correcting yet again another one of David Barnes lies
In other words, loss of self control again. GO AWAY.
David Barnes will lie as he is doing above to trick people into responding
to him.
If so, it seems to be working on you.
No supervisors of mine were ever contacted. None of them have ever heard of
David
Barnes.
Never heard of me? You said you told them about me and they told you
to stop wasting your time. Having trouble keeping your lies straight?
As far as the comments about Patrick Humphrey and David Barnes being
criminals, I have provided
state documentation with sources to back it up.
L I A R.
The comments Barnes makes about contacting supervisors is a flat out lie.
Then how do I know so much about you?
Challenged to him before to back up, only for him to run away making some
excuse.
I always back up what I say.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already addresses
that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes enslaved
and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Correcting David Barnes lies |
27 Apr 2004 10:26:11 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420042018218692%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <2rudnV8VCaaThhLdRVn-tA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420041940071028%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your
friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great
time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was
smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy.
Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who
support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years,
primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy
and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as
many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some
of
the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice,
are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes
beyond
the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly
threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the
pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially
in
this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors found
out...)
Correcting yet again another one of David Barnes lies
In other words, loss of self control again. GO AWAY.
David Barnes will lie as he is doing above to trick people into
responding
to him.
If so, it seems to be working on you.
No supervisors of mine were ever contacted. None of them have ever
heard of
David
Barnes.
Never heard of me?
Not one single supervisor or administrator has spoken nor heard of any David
Barnes
You said you told them about me and they told you
to stop wasting your time. Having trouble keeping your lies straight?
As far as the comments about Patrick Humphrey and David Barnes being
criminals, I have provided
state documentation with sources to back it up.
L I A R.
I have provided documentation and sources to back up that Patrick Humphrey
and David Barnes both had been convicted of criminal charges.
The comments Barnes makes about contacting supervisors is a flat out
lie.
Then how do I know so much about you?
You don't
State the supervisors name then.
Challenged to him before to back up, only for him to run away making
some
excuse.
I always back up what I say.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already
addresses
that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes
enslaved
and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Correcting David Barnes lies |
27 Apr 2004 10:40:31 PM |
|
|
In article <2fednUsGWsWSuRLdRVn-jg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420042018218692%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <2rudnV8VCaaThhLdRVn-tA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420041940071028%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your
friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a great
time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone was
smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy.
Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who
support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years,
primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the pregnancy
and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as
many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against some
of
the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and pro-choice,
are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes
beyond
the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly
threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the
pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice side..especially
in
this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors found
out...)
Correcting yet again another one of David Barnes lies
In other words, loss of self control again. GO AWAY.
David Barnes will lie as he is doing above to trick people into
responding
to him.
If so, it seems to be working on you.
No supervisors of mine were ever contacted. None of them have ever
heard of
David
Barnes.
Never heard of me?
Not one single supervisor or administrator has spoken nor heard of any David
Barnes
So you admit you are a liar.
You said you told them about me and they told you
to stop wasting your time. Having trouble keeping your lies straight?
As far as the comments about Patrick Humphrey and David Barnes being
criminals, I have provided
state documentation with sources to back it up.
L I A R.
I have provided documentation and sources to back up that Patrick Humphrey
and David Barnes both had been convicted of criminal charges.
David W. Barnes? Heishman thinks that if he finds some person with a
similar name and claims it is us it relives him from his reckless
conduct as a guard.
The comments Barnes makes about contacting supervisors is a flat out
lie.
Then how do I know so much about you?
You don't
State the supervisors name then.
Ever hear of privacy? He asked that I not divulge that. Tell us your
social security number.
Challenged to him before to back up, only for him to run away making
some
excuse.
I always back up what I say.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already
addresses
that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes
enslaved
and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Correcting David Barnes lies |
27 Apr 2004 10:48:31 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420042040318491%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <2fednUsGWsWSuRLdRVn-jg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420042018218692%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <2rudnV8VCaaThhLdRVn-tA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <VoteKerry@dbarnes.com> wrote in message
news:270420041940071028%VoteKerry@dbarnes.com...
In article <vomdnXvi9_LVjBLdRVn-vg@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Greg Bernath" <gregignoresthis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:333u809695rme0amfio09guv6h26d8r5tj@4ax.com...
hate feminism <fdsa@gfd.spam> wrote:
Speakers called the event the largest "march in history,"
and claimed a "million marchers." They were only off by
about 700,000 (if the press's generous 300,000 figure is
accurate).
Who is this mysterious "press"? Oh, that's right, it's your
friends at
pulleditoutofmyass.com
The DC police called it 800,000. They usually underestimate.
Organizers registered 1.1 million. Everyone who went had a
great
time,
the organization was fantastic, as was the weather. Someone
was
smart
enough not to schedule a rally in DC in August.
It was biggest march in history in DC. Deal with it, pink boy.
Your
side is heading towards historical footnote status, to be
listed
alongside slavers and segregationists in the "evils of the
past"
category.
Greg Bernath
I have already shown where it is actually the pro-choicers who
support
enslavement
Deal with this
More people are turning against abortion than in previous years,
primarily
due to education.
Studies prove the more educated one is the less likely they are to
be
pro-life. The less educated one is, the more likely they are to
be
pro-life.
People are becoming more educated as to the stages of the
pregnancy
and
realizing through modern
medical technology that the fetus isn't just a glob of tissue as
many
pro-aborts use to believe.
Too bad those facts keep getting in the way.
More people are changing their attitudes, and turning against
some
of
the
issues like late term abortions.
So, instead of a dozen, like last year, now we have two dozen?
I think most reasonable people, including pro-life and
pro-choice,
are
willing to agree that if a woman wants
to abort that she do it at the earliest stage. That if it goes
beyond
the
first tri-mester we have gone into a point
where it should be too late to decide to abort, UNLESS it truly
threatens
her life and other methods are not
available.
Think again.
As far as segregation goes, I personally see more of that on the
pro-choice
side. Instead of wanting to unite and
come together on the issues, many on the pro-choice
side..especially
in
this
NG want to seperate and attack others
who don't agree.
Not like you, right? Remember all those stories you made up about
how
Patrick and I were convicted criminals? (Until your supervisors
found
out...)
Correcting yet again another one of David Barnes lies
In other words, loss of self control again. GO AWAY.
David Barnes will lie as he is doing above to trick people into
responding
to him.
If so, it seems to be working on you.
No supervisors of mine were ever contacted. None of them have ever
heard of
David
Barnes.
Never heard of me?
Not one single supervisor or administrator has spoken nor heard of any
David
Barnes
So you admit you are a liar.
You said you told them about me and they told you
to stop wasting your time. Having trouble keeping your lies straight?
As far as the comments about Patrick Humphrey and David Barnes being
criminals, I have provided
state documentation with sources to back it up.
L I A R.
I have provided documentation and sources to back up that Patrick
Humphrey
and David Barnes both had been convicted of criminal charges.
David W. Barnes? Heishman thinks that if he finds some person with a
similar name and claims it is us it relives him from his reckless
conduct as a guard.
I have provided documents and sources to back it up.
The comments Barnes makes about contacting supervisors is a flat out
lie.
Then how do I know so much about you?
You don't
State the supervisors name then.
Ever hear of privacy? He asked that I not divulge that. Tell us your
social security number.
David Barnes has never spoken to one single supervisor of mine.
Fact is, I have already contacted my IA department and all my supervisors in
my chain of command
and they are now well aware of David Barnes activities and what he has said
on here.
David Barnes has permission to release the name of the person he claims to
have spoken with.
Go ahead Barnes, we are all waiting.
Fact: Not one single supervisor in my department has ever spoken or heard of
David Barnes
other than what I have already released to them.
David Barnes has no other excuses left to cover this lie he has been telling
for several months now.
Go ahead Barnes, give the last name at least.
Challenged to him before to back up, only for him to run away making
some
excuse.
I always back up what I say.
As far as enslavement goes, another post I have made already
addresses
that
and points out that in most cases it is
usually the pro-choicer who is willing to see one of the sexes
enslaved
and
is against equal choices and rights.
"Willing to see" really means "willing to point out."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
