| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
20 Jul 2004 09:15:35 AM |
| Object: |
Anonymity ( and respect ) |
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkoembfmm7.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[..........................]
My province? You're the one calling these people killers, not me.
Sorry, but that's your selective reading problem, as usual. I'm just
stating a fact -- your little charade won't be appreciated by those
people you're so eager to smear because of my association with them.
You can run away again, anonymous coward.
I don't know what you're association is but my sympathies are with the
people of Hazard. What exactly do consider anonymous? Perhaps I could
change my name to Somekindofwriter, or Snake955, or Loosebowels. If I
posted along your line of thinking, that wouldn't be an issue, would
it? You're a full of crap person who gets exposed a little more each
time you write.
I doubt anyone in Hazard, or anywhere else in the region, could care less
about your mental "disability". One detail you overlook in your rant,
though: "Somesappywriter" has a real name, and I know it. (For reasons
obvious to everyone but you and your comrades, she's not giving it out to
just anyone, and I'm not betraying her trust in me by revealing it. I look
forward to your creating some extensive *and* fact-free fantasies about
that information.)
Guess what, everybody has a real name. What I need to know is why when
people agree with you, anonymity is okay "for obvious reasons", but if
someone disagrees with you, they're "anonymous cowards"( even if they
post their real name but don't post all the information any good ID
theft person could use ).Also, I'm not asking for Kris Blake's real
name; if she wants to reveal it, that's her business.This is a
discussion group, we're not signing any legal documents in this forum.
Even a schmuck like *you* might have a legitimate reason for hiding behind an
alias, but since all appearances point to the conclusion that you're just
interested in trying to annoy people while ducking the responsibility for your
actions, even you should be able to figure out why you get very little
respect. That you don't isn't anyone else's problem, little dropout.
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
.
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 05:21:06 PM |
|
|
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261243.59c66530@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<%68Nc.15784$mL5.6383@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbri35pf4.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> writes:
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
LC~ KU Klux Krazy: Still obsessing, still compulsive and, as always,
disordered.
"Of course I've done bad things, said bad things..etc. However, I am
forgiven of previous sins by repentance. Don't believe me? Use my
shovel to dig for improper posts after I claimed to be a
Christian."~Krazy K, lying again.
<5dbdf251.0406111518.2adb199d@posting.google.com>
I think he's using a classic excuse: Jesus died for our sins, so why
make his sacrifice meaningless if he doesn't at least commit a few?
Indeed. Ku Klux Kent is practicing a timeless circle jerk: Be a mindless
f**k up, say prayer, be forgiven. Repeat, ad infinitum. Hope it works.
<only mindless non sequiturs snipped. If there was a point, it remains>
[...]
LC~ As usual, Ku Klux Krazy forgot to make a point.
"I have to learn to do the Christian thing."~KKKent, liar, hypocrite, and
slow learner.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
27 Jul 2004 08:16:36 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<mtfNc.16168$mL5.7878@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261243.59c66530@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<%68Nc.15784$mL5.6383@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbri35pf4.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> writes:
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
LC~ KU Klux Krazy: Still obsessing, still compulsive and, as always,
disordered.
"Of course I've done bad things, said bad things..etc. However, I am
forgiven of previous sins by repentance. Don't believe me? Use my
shovel to dig for improper posts after I claimed to be a
Christian."~Krazy K, lying again.
<5dbdf251.0406111518.2adb199d@posting.google.com>
I think he's using a classic excuse: Jesus died for our sins, so why
make his sacrifice meaningless if he doesn't at least commit a few?
Indeed. Ku Klux Kent is practicing a timeless circle jerk: Be a mindless
f**k up, say prayer, be forgiven. Repeat, ad infinitum. Hope it works.
<only mindless non sequiturs snipped. If there was a point, it remains>
Of course you'll call 'em 'non sequiturs'; makes it much easier to
evade. Buh-bye, Nut-Puppet. Nnneexxtttt!!!
Ye Superior, in all regards
KK
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 05:35:59 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<hVYMc.16340$Qu5.2150@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
Sure, pampers, sure. LOL.
LC~ KU Klux Krazy: Still obsessing, still compulsive and, as always,
disordered.
All because you say so. Now, where's 'at grain of salt?
"Of course I've done bad things, said bad things..etc. However, I am
forgiven of previous sins by repentance. Don't believe me? Use my
shovel to dig for improper posts after I claimed to be a Christian."~Krazy
K, lying again.
<5dbdf251.0406111518.2adb199d@posting.google.com>
Nope. Your schtick won't work. You still haven't found the thread
where I claim to be a Christian. It's out there, so Keep pullin' up
'em roots; you're bound to find something besides wild cabbage. LOL.
Next.
Ye Master & Commander
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 09:29:28 AM |
|
|
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407260235.67a54198@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<hVYMc.16340$Qu5.2150@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
Sure, pampers, sure. LOL.
Glad you're finally coming out of that drug-induced fog, KKKronic.
Remember, drugs are for people who can't handle reality.
LC~ KU Klux Krazy: Still obsessing, still compulsive and, as always,
disordered.
All because you say so.
Now you're getting it, Dancing Devine.
Now, where's 'at grain of salt?
In your crack pipe (old habits apparently die hard).
LC~ Always trying to help misguided addicts find their way back.
"My main diversion is dope and food."~Ku Klux Krazy, in
1791-3E2C17A8-38@storefull-2116.public.lawson.webtv.net
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
27 Jul 2004 12:19:14 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> writes:
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407260235.67a54198@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<hVYMc.16340$Qu5.2150@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
Sure, pampers, sure. LOL.
Glad you're finally coming out of that drug-induced fog, KKKronic.
Remember, drugs are for people who can't handle reality.
Don't forget his "Rehab is for Quitters!" shirt.
LC~ KU Klux Krazy: Still obsessing, still compulsive and, as always,
disordered.
All because you say so.
Now you're getting it, Dancing Devine.
Actually, he's had it. By George, he's had it!
Now, where's 'at grain of salt?
In your crack pipe (old habits apparently die hard).
LC~ Always trying to help misguided addicts find their way back.
....to whatever planet they illegaly emigrated here from.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 03:56:59 PM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<cz8Nc.15806$mL5.6820@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407260235.67a54198@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<hVYMc.16340$Qu5.2150@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407241425.7fcfb88b@posting.google.com...
<nothing coherent, much less "Christian">
Sure, pampers, sure. LOL.
Glad you're finally coming out of that drug-induced fog, KKKronic.
Remember, drugs are for people who can't handle reality.
Including those that have a terminal illness and wish for drugs
(euthanasia anyone?)to end their pain? What a hypocritical stooge you
am, Puppet:
<llYRb.660$jH6.538@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"In a "perfect world" no one would be consigned, via any number of
terminal
diseases, to die a painful death. There would be no need to consider
end of
life issues like euthanasia".
But, don't you want *me* to die? Yes:
<CMDCc.16150$Wr.14534@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
"Sounds like a miserable existence you lead, Krazy. Take your meds,
KKKent!
Or, better still, kill yourself. You won't be missed".
Looks like your statement is rather redundant, Puppet. Now fly away
with what little dignity I'll allow you. Nnneexxttt.
Ye Cyber Lord
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 05:06:36 PM |
|
|
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
LC~ And he has a Popeye complex.
"When I'm at work I, after the weekend sensation fades away, eventually
want to kill a few of my co-workers."~Krazy Psycho Kent, feeling the love,
in <9156-3B3F3618-59@storefull-174.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
27 Jul 2004 12:21:25 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> writes:
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
Because he's cheaper than using a goat.
LC~ And he has a Popeye complex.
"When I'm at work I, after the weekend sensation fades away, eventually
want to kill a few of my co-workers."~Krazy Psycho Kent, feeling the love,
in <9156-3B3F3618-59@storefull-174.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
Such are the drawbacks to getting pounded senseless in the ring for a living.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
27 Jul 2004 08:13:07 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<MffNc.16156$mL5.8914@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
....And why Puppet chose posting anonymously to Usenet, o'er finding a
cure for cancer. LOL. Nnneexxxtttt.
Ye Better
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
27 Jul 2004 08:59:30 AM |
|
|
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407270513.64cf0207@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<MffNc.16156$mL5.8914@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
...And why Puppet chose posting anonymously to Usenet
[...]
Says the diagnosed mental case that goes by "Krazy".
Too funny.
LC~ Thinks Kent the janitor has been snorting dirt off the factory floor.
That *could* explain why he keeps walking into walls of his own making.
"One of these days I'm scared that I might use my hacker pal to locate
one of these loud mouth bastards. Then, in the almost worst case
scenario, some ***** like "Hazel" gets the beatdown of a lifetime,
resulting in permanent disability. Do you wanna know the "worst case
scenario"?~KrAzY k, anonymous poster, slipping a cog, in
<18663-3D25C649-48@storefull-2112.public.lawson.webtv.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
28 Jul 2004 07:48:47 AM |
|
|
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<6dtNc.183$9Y6.147@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407270513.64cf0207@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<MffNc.16156$mL5.8914@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" <Groundandpound64@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
...And why Puppet chose posting anonymously to Usenet
[...]
Says the diagnosed mental case that goes by "Krazy".
Too funny.
LOL. Runnin' low on comebacks, eh? Amusing.
LC~ Thinks Kent the janitor has been snorting dirt off the factory floor.
That *could* explain why he keeps walking into walls of his own making.
Says the drug-addled, bigoted hypocrite:
Message-ID: <3ede69f6_3@newsfeed>
"I spent some time visiting the 'free state' of Christiana, in
Copenhagen, a
few summers back. Small quantities of soft drugs are readily available
for purchase and consumption there."
But, Puppet, I thought you lived clean? ROTF:
Message-ID: <y9CGc.6738$R36.1355@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
"Again, you've made a bold proclamation devoid of any evidence. For
the
record, I take *no* prescribed meds, as if that matters. Just good
genes and
clean livin', two attributes you clearly cannot claim".
Hmmm. Abusing "soft" drugs might declare you kinda hypocritical, so we
better blame it on your genes, which btw aren't good at all. LMAO.
Nnnneeexxxttt!
Ye Better
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
30 Jul 2004 05:22:41 AM |
|
|
On 28 Jul 2004 05:48:47 -0700, (Krazy K)
wrote:
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message news:<6dtNc.183$9Y6.147@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" < > wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407270513.64cf0207@posting.google.com...
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com> wrote in message
news:<MffNc.16156$mL5.8914@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
"Krazy K" < > wrote in message
news:5dbdf251.0407261256.4716a82d@posting.google.com...
<rants of a diagnosed mental patient snipped>
What a hypocritical stooge you am, Puppet:
[...]
Thus answering the question of why Ku Klux Kent ended up as the factory
janitor.
...And why Puppet chose posting anonymously to Usenet
[...]
Says the diagnosed mental case that goes by "Krazy".
Too funny.
LOL. Runnin' low on comebacks, eh? Amusing.
You did admit to having OCD and anger problems, did you not?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
21 Jul 2004 10:12:27 PM |
|
|
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkzn5uz0st.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkoembfmm7.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[..........................]
My province? You're the one calling these people killers, not me.
Sorry, but that's your selective reading problem, as usual. I'm
just stating a fact -- your little charade won't be appreciated by
those people you're so eager to smear because of my association
with them. You can run away again, anonymous coward.
I don't know what you're association is but my sympathies are with
the people of Hazard. What exactly do consider anonymous? Perhaps I
could change my name to Somekindofwriter, or Snake955, or
Loosebowels. If I posted along your line of thinking, that wouldn't
be an issue, would it? You're a full of crap person who gets exposed
a little more each time you write.
I doubt anyone in Hazard, or anywhere else in the region, could care
less about your mental "disability". One detail you overlook in your
rant, though: "Somesappywriter" has a real name, and I know it.
(For reasons obvious to everyone but you and your comrades, she's not
giving it out to just anyone, and I'm not betraying her trust in me
by revealing it. I look forward to your creating some extensive
*and* fact-free fantasies about that information.)
Guess what, everybody has a real name. What I need to know is why when
people agree with you, anonymity is okay "for obvious reasons", but if
someone disagrees with you, they're "anonymous cowards"( even if they
post their real name but don't post all the information any good ID
theft person could use ).Also, I'm not asking for Kris Blake's real
name; if she wants to reveal it, that's her business.This is a
discussion group, we're not signing any legal documents in this forum.
Even a schmuck like *you* might have a legitimate reason for hiding
behind an alias, but since all appearances point to the conclusion that
you're just interested in trying to annoy people while ducking the
responsibility for your actions, even you should be able to figure out
why you get very little respect. That you don't isn't anyone else's
problem, little dropout.
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
Nice rant, anonymous kindergarten reject...a long line of uneducated
hillbillies? Hmmm...my maternal grandfather was a postmaster of the coal
camp in which I was born, and later the operator of the town's...
<snip>
LOL. Spare us the scenes from "my humble life", 'kay? You've *nothing*
to be proud of; you support the death of innocent human beings via
abortion, you effeminately dance with queers during gay pride events,
and you've been accused of being a child molester. Now that we know
your resume, and your schtick, why don't you concentrate on building
your name back up so that your ancestors can get some sleep? Luckily,
you're as impotent as your hopping-mad nut-puppet, Pampers. Next.
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's been
born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having -- to
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You really
need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're feeding you
fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions I've expressed
in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an apology in any case.
Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "somesappywriter " |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
23 Jul 2004 03:06:35 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's been
born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having -- to
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
:-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
23 Jul 2004 05:24:31 PM |
|
|
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's been
born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having -- to
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 05:23:28 AM |
|
|
On 23 Jul 2004 17:24:31 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's been
born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having -- to
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
Just that one little smiley represents a whole lot of agreement,
Patpack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 07:59:20 AM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 23 Jul 2004 17:24:31 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having
-- to make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
Just that one little smiley represents a whole lot of agreement,
Patpack.
....and more than a little added frustration for an anonymous crank or two.
Here's my contribution for this morning: :-{) (mustache included)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 08:16:37 AM |
|
|
On 24 Jul 2004 07:59:20 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 23 Jul 2004 17:24:31 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having
-- to make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
Just that one little smiley represents a whole lot of agreement,
Patpack.
...and more than a little added frustration for an anonymous crank or two.
Here's my contribution for this morning: :-{) (mustache included)
LOL 8-) (reading spectacles included).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 11:40:19 PM |
|
|
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 24 Jul 2004 07:59:20 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 23 Jul 2004 17:24:31 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her
having -- to make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your
caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
Just that one little smiley represents a whole lot of agreement,
Patpack.
...and more than a little added frustration for an anonymous crank or two.
Here's my contribution for this morning: :-{) (mustache included)
LOL 8-) (reading spectacles included).
That's a relief -- for a second, I thought some bug had decided to shuffle off
this mortal coil on my monitor screen...;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somesappywriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
25 Jul 2004 05:14:59 AM |
|
|
On 24 Jul 2004 23:40:19 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 24 Jul 2004 07:59:20 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somesappywriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 23 Jul 2004 17:24:31 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
somesappywriter <> writes:
On 21 Jul 2004 22:12:27 -0500, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her
having -- to make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your
caterwauling.
:-)
That'll torque him that extra bit more. ;-)
Just that one little smiley represents a whole lot of agreement,
Patpack.
...and more than a little added frustration for an anonymous crank or two.
Here's my contribution for this morning: :-{) (mustache included)
LOL 8-) (reading spectacles included).
That's a relief -- for a second, I thought some bug had decided to shuffle off
this mortal coil on my monitor screen...;-)
HAHAHAHA. Nope.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
22 Jul 2004 10:01:50 AM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkzn5uz0st.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkoembfmm7.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[..........................]
My province? You're the one calling these people killers, not me.
Sorry, but that's your selective reading problem, as usual. I'm
just stating a fact -- your little charade won't be appreciated by
those people you're so eager to smear because of my association
with them. You can run away again, anonymous coward.
I don't know what you're association is but my sympathies are with
the people of Hazard. What exactly do consider anonymous? Perhaps I
could change my name to Somekindofwriter, or Snake955, or
Loosebowels. If I posted along your line of thinking, that wouldn't
be an issue, would it? You're a full of crap person who gets exposed
a little more each time you write.
I doubt anyone in Hazard, or anywhere else in the region, could care
less about your mental "disability". One detail you overlook in your
rant, though: "Somesappywriter" has a real name, and I know it.
(For reasons obvious to everyone but you and your comrades, she's not
giving it out to just anyone, and I'm not betraying her trust in me
by revealing it. I look forward to your creating some extensive
*and* fact-free fantasies about that information.)
Guess what, everybody has a real name. What I need to know is why when
people agree with you, anonymity is okay "for obvious reasons", but if
someone disagrees with you, they're "anonymous cowards"( even if they
post their real name but don't post all the information any good ID
theft person could use ).Also, I'm not asking for Kris Blake's real
name; if she wants to reveal it, that's her business.This is a
discussion group, we're not signing any legal documents in this forum.
Even a schmuck like *you* might have a legitimate reason for hiding
behind an alias, but since all appearances point to the conclusion that
you're just interested in trying to annoy people while ducking the
responsibility for your actions, even you should be able to figure out
why you get very little respect. That you don't isn't anyone else's
problem, little dropout.
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
Nice rant, anonymous kindergarten reject...a long line of uneducated
hillbillies? Hmmm...my maternal grandfather was a postmaster of the coal
camp in which I was born, and later the operator of the town's...
<snip>
LOL. Spare us the scenes from "my humble life", 'kay? You've *nothing*
to be proud of; you support the death of innocent human beings via
abortion, you effeminately dance with queers during gay pride events,
and you've been accused of being a child molester. Now that we know
your resume, and your schtick, why don't you concentrate on building
your name back up so that your ancestors can get some sleep? Luckily,
you're as impotent as your hopping-mad nut-puppet, Pampers. Next.
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's been
born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having -- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You really
need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're feeding you
fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions I've expressed
in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an apology in any case.
Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
23 Jul 2004 08:22:10 PM |
|
|
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkzn5uz0st.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[...]
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
Nice rant, anonymous kindergarten reject...a long line of uneducated
hillbillies? Hmmm...my maternal grandfather was a postmaster of the coal
camp in which I was born, and later the operator of the town's...
<snip>
LOL. Spare us the scenes from "my humble life", 'kay? You've *nothing*
to be proud of; you support the death of innocent human beings via
abortion, you effeminately dance with queers during gay pride events,
and you've been accused of being a child molester. Now that we know
your resume, and your schtick, why don't you concentrate on building
your name back up so that your ancestors can get some sleep? Luckily,
you're as impotent as your hopping-mad nut-puppet, Pampers. Next.
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having
-- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the woman --
that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to make her own
choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving birth *is* a choice,
too, whether you understand it or not. How do you explain the existence of
pro-choice parents?)
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my supposed
morality? That's my business.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You
really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're
feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions
I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an
apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a remotely
credible job of fleecing any flock.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 05:55:23 PM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkk6wumc71.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkzn5uz0st.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[...]
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
Nice rant, anonymous kindergarten reject...a long line of uneducated
hillbillies? Hmmm...my maternal grandfather was a postmaster of the coal
camp in which I was born, and later the operator of the town's...
<snip>
LOL. Spare us the scenes from "my humble life", 'kay? You've *nothing*
to be proud of; you support the death of innocent human beings via
abortion, you effeminately dance with queers during gay pride events,
and you've been accused of being a child molester. Now that we know
your resume, and your schtick, why don't you concentrate on building
your name back up so that your ancestors can get some sleep? Luckily,
you're as impotent as your hopping-mad nut-puppet, Pampers. Next.
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her having
-- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the woman --
that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to make her own
choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving birth *is* a choice,
too, whether you understand it or not. How do you explain the existence of
pro-choice parents?)
Irrelevant. When the result of the woman's choice means certain doom
for a human being, Heir Humphrey, it becomes an issue of life & death,
whether you like it or not.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my supposed
morality? That's my business.
Not really. If it's your business to post support of human depravity,
then it's "our" (Usenet) right to distinguish you by such. Everyone
deserves to know of your vile, cold ways.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You
really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're
feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions
I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an
apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a remotely
credible job of fleecing any flock.
Coming from someone that supports the cold-blooded murder of the
unborn says a lot. Stooge. Your type's a dime a dozen, Heir Humphrey;
you'll always hate Christians because it's in your tainted blood.
Next.
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
24 Jul 2004 11:54:41 PM |
|
|
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkk6wumc71.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her
having -- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the woman
-- that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to make her
own choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving birth *is* a
choice, too, whether you understand it or not. How do you explain the
existence of pro-choice parents?)
Irrelevant. When the result of the woman's choice means certain doom
for a human being, Heir Humphrey, it becomes an issue of life & death,
whether you like it or not.
You don't get to define that for anyone but your befuddled self, OCD Boy. You
couldn't care less about the woman unless she has the audacity to choose what
you don't approve of. It's her decision, and you're not in the loop. Welcome
to reality.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my
supposed morality? That's my business.
Not really. If it's your business to post support of human depravity,
then it's "our" (Usenet) right to distinguish you by such. Everyone
deserves to know of your vile, cold ways.
Nice self-righteous rant, Old Turkey Boy -- wouldn't it be a shame if you
didn't even believe your own slobbering? (If you really did, you'd have
called everyone from the local cops to the World Court by now. That you
haven't shows how seriously you take your own pontificating -- which is barely
more than I take it.)
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You
really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're
feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions
I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an
apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a
remotely credible job of fleecing any flock.
Coming from someone that supports the cold-blooded murder of the
unborn says a lot. Stooge. Your type's a dime a dozen, Heir Humphrey;
you'll always hate Christians because it's in your tainted blood.
Next.
Really? I'm married to one, and I have more than a few friends who are.
Unlike you, they actually bother to spend some time living in *this* world.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
25 Jul 2004 08:13:35 PM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksmbgelf2.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkk6wumc71.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman -- who's
been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand her
having -- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the woman
-- that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to make her
own choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving birth *is* a
choice, too, whether you understand it or not. How do you explain the
existence of pro-choice parents?)
Irrelevant. When the result of the woman's choice means certain doom
for a human being, Heir Humphrey, it becomes an issue of life & death,
whether you like it or not.
You don't get to define that for anyone but your befuddled self, OCD Boy.
Nope. Irrelevant. It doesn't *need* defining, unless you're incapable
of grasping the notion of pre-meditated murder, Mr. Lester.
You
couldn't care less about the woman unless she has the audacity to choose what
you don't approve of. It's her decision, and you're not in the loop. Welcome
to reality.
You're confusing morality with bigotry it seems. Opinions mean little
when the truth is displayed for all to see: underdeveloped human
beings -- slaughtered by uncaring, selfish mothers who were taught
those "values" from the immorally depraved.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my
supposed morality? That's my business.
Not really. If it's your business to post support of human depravity,
then it's "our" (Usenet) right to distinguish you by such. Everyone
deserves to know of your vile, cold ways.
Nice self-righteous rant, Old Turkey Boy --
Thanks, molester man.
wouldn't it be a shame if you
didn't even believe your own slobbering? (If you really did, you'd have
called everyone from the local cops to the World Court by now. That you
haven't shows how seriously you take your own pontificating -- which is barely
more than I take it.)
I'm not sure why you think I'd have to call someone as proof that I
hate abortions. You need to get away from them low-budget rat-holes,
Heir Humphrey.
LOL.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling. You
really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well -- they're
feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of the opinions
I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be considered for an
apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a
remotely credible job of fleecing any flock.
Coming from someone that supports the cold-blooded murder of the
unborn says a lot. Stooge. Your type's a dime a dozen, Heir Humphrey;
you'll always hate Christians because it's in your tainted blood.
Next.
Really? I'm married to one, and I have more than a few friends who are.
LMAO. Dale Ann is no Christian if she callously believes abortion is
practical. Also, if she supports queerdom, then she's a faux Christian
indeed. Funny.
Unlike you, they actually bother to spend some time living in *this* world.
That & a penny'll get ya squat, liar king. Next.
KK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 12:04:00 AM |
|
|
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksmbgelf2.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkk6wumc71.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
(Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman --
who's been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand
her having -- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the
woman -- that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to
make her own choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving
birth *is* a choice, too, whether you understand it or not. How do you
explain the existence of pro-choice parents?)
Irrelevant. When the result of the woman's choice means certain doom
for a human being, Heir Humphrey, it becomes an issue of life & death,
whether you like it or not.
You don't get to define that for anyone but your befuddled self, OCD Boy.
Nope. Irrelevant. It doesn't *need* defining, unless you're incapable
of grasping the notion of pre-meditated murder, Mr. Lester.
You don't get to define an embryo as a person, Klan Kook. The law says you're
out in left field.
You couldn't care less about the woman unless she has the audacity to
choose what you don't approve of. It's her decision, and you're not in the
loop. Welcome to reality.
You're confusing morality with bigotry it seems. Opinions mean little
when the truth is displayed for all to see: underdeveloped human
beings -- slaughtered by uncaring, selfish mothers who were taught
those "values" from the immorally depraved.
So, you've been dumped on your head too many times to figure out that your
opinion doesn't automatically equate to fact. Just because you can't be a
father is a poor excuse for your attitude.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my
supposed morality? That's my business.
Not really. If it's your business to post support of human depravity,
then it's "our" (Usenet) right to distinguish you by such. Everyone
deserves to know of your vile, cold ways.
Nice self-righteous rant, Old Turkey Boy --
Thanks, molester man.
Don't think you'll ever cause me any actual damage by your attempted libel.
You already destroyed your credibility. (Google isn't your friend.)
wouldn't it be a shame if you didn't even believe your own slobbering? (If
you really did, you'd have called everyone from the local cops to the World
Court by now. That you haven't shows how seriously you take your own
pontificating -- which is barely more than I take it.)
I'm not sure why you think I'd have to call someone as proof that I
hate abortions. You need to get away from them low-budget rat-holes,
Heir Humphrey.
You need to quit hitting the bottle and check out reality for once, Ku Klux
Kook.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
You really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well --
they're feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of
the opinions I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be
considered for an apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical
DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a
remotely credible job of fleecing any flock.
Coming from someone that supports the cold-blooded murder of the
unborn says a lot. Stooge. Your type's a dime a dozen, Heir Humphrey;
you'll always hate Christians because it's in your tainted blood.
Next.
Really? I'm married to one, and I have more than a few friends who are.
LMAO. Dale Ann is no Christian if she callously believes abortion is
practical. Also, if she supports queerdom, then she's a faux Christian
indeed. Funny.
Not all Christians are the arrogant little ***** that you act like, Kent.
Maybe you should actually read that bible, for once.
Unlike you, they actually bother to spend some time living in *this* world.
That & a penny'll get ya squat, liar king. Next.
A penny is a gross overestimation of the worth of *your* dreck.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krazy K" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
26 Jul 2004 06:56:06 AM |
|
|
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkfz7f5phb.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksmbgelf2.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkk6wumc71.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
Groundandpound64@hotmail.com (Krazy K) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk8ydcvip0.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
[...]
Projection becomes you, Kook Klux Kent. I support of the woman --
who's been born and is obviously a person with rights you can't stand
her having -- to
Yep. You, molester boy, support women that support the death of their
unborn.
You're not even a very good idiot, KKKent. I stand in support of the
woman -- that person you can't even acknowledge the existence of -- to
make her own choice, whether it's to abort or to give birth. (Giving
birth *is* a choice, too, whether you understand it or not. How do you
explain the existence of pro-choice parents?)
Irrelevant. When the result of the woman's choice means certain doom
for a human being, Heir Humphrey, it becomes an issue of life & death,
whether you like it or not.
You don't get to define that for anyone but your befuddled self, OCD Boy.
Nope. Irrelevant. It doesn't *need* defining, unless you're incapable
of grasping the notion of pre-meditated murder, Mr. Lester.
You don't get to define an embryo as a person, Klan Kook. The law says you're
out in left field.
Nope. Human law means nothing, Mo, compared to the universal truth of
the matter: zefs are fully human entities, in an underdeveloped state.
That's why we cringe when we're reminded of our ancestors deeds:
slavery, Indian massacre..etc. I'm sure our future descendants will
learn from our mistakes too: abortion, gay marriage..etc. Of course,
it may take *your* tainted bloodline a few thousand years, but it'll
be worth the wait for those that'll have to suffer their existence.
You couldn't care less about the woman unless she has the audacity to
choose what you don't approve of. It's her decision, and you're not in the
loop. Welcome to reality.
You're confusing morality with bigotry it seems. Opinions mean little
when the truth is displayed for all to see: underdeveloped human
beings -- slaughtered by uncaring, selfish mothers who were taught
those "values" from the immorally depraved.
So, you've been dumped on your head too many times to figure out that your
opinion doesn't automatically equate to fact. Just because you can't be a
father is a poor excuse for your attitude.
Actually, it isn't just *my* opinion; it's the verifiable truth. If
you don't agree, please prove that a zef is *not* human. Of course you
won't, 'cause ya can't. That's the magic of reality, it'll set you
free from the burden of ignorance, if you'll just let it.
You're as shameful as your queer buddy, Pampers, and every bit as
derelicted in your sense of morality.
Why should I care what some illiterate sot in Louisville thinks of my
supposed morality? That's my business.
Not really. If it's your business to post support of human depravity,
then it's "our" (Usenet) right to distinguish you by such. Everyone
deserves to know of your vile, cold ways.
Nice self-righteous rant, Old Turkey Boy --
Thanks, molester man.
Don't think you'll ever cause me any actual damage by your attempted libel.
You already destroyed your credibility. (Google isn't your friend.)
LOL. Nope. You've done enormous damage to yourself, by allowing your
stalking victims to capitalize on *your* muck-ups. You've been exposed
and now you're paying for it. As several posters pointed out, you're a
"flagrant liar" that supports the choice to "murder the unborn".
You're also a "$$$ moocher", and you're "hand-in-hand", literally,
with the queer agenda. Plus, you seem to enjoy "stalking hapless
victims". Throw all 'at in a pot, add vinegar, some yellow food
coloring, and you may be able to market it to the skanks,
whoremongers, murderers and other child molesters of the underworld.
You're about as shameful as your nut-Puppet, Pampers, 'cept he's too
much of a craven coward to post his real name, like you say. Of
course, I'd rather be a coward than for all of Usenet to know my every
move, so he gets a few brownie points. Poor Heir Humphrey. Sucks to be
you.
wouldn't it be a shame if you didn't even believe your own slobbering? (If
you really did, you'd have called everyone from the local cops to the World
Court by now. That you haven't shows how seriously you take your own
pontificating -- which is barely more than I take it.)
I'm not sure why you think I'd have to call someone as proof that I
hate abortions. You need to get away from them low-budget rat-holes,
Heir Humphrey.
You need to quit hitting the bottle and check out reality for once, Ku Klux
Kook.
Hint: pick the roaches *out* of the oatmeal *before* you eat it. Of
course, that's only an option for people compelled to reside in
low-rent apartments in the poorest parts of town. LOL. Sucks to be
you, college drop-out.
make her own decisions if she chooses to ignore your caterwauling.
You really need to pay the stalkers you hire a lot better, as well --
they're feeding you fantasies. I don't have to apologize for any of
the opinions I've expressed in this newsgroup, and you wouldn't be
considered for an apology in any case. Back to your bottle, Chemical
DeRanger...
Your morbid sense of dignity & integrity are noted. One of these days,
hopefully, before the final judgement, I pray you'll understand the
value of human life, no matter how small. Next.
Still pretending to be Christian, Reverend Oral? You're not doing a
remotely credible job of fleecing any flock.
Coming from someone that supports the cold-blooded murder of the
unborn says a lot. Stooge. Your type's a dime a dozen, Heir Humphrey;
you'll always hate Christians because it's in your tainted blood.
Next.
Really? I'm married to one, and I have more than a few friends who are.
LMAO. Dale Ann is no Christian if she callously believes abortion is
practical. Also, if she supports queerdom, then she's a faux Christian
indeed. Funny.
Not all Christians are the arrogant little ***** that you act like, Kent.
Maybe you should actually read that bible, for once.
I have. No where in it states that killing the unborn is favorable in
God's eyes. In fact, God places significance on the unborn; more
significance than your alleged "X-tian" wife has for them. Dale Ann is
no Christian, and you're a reprobate. Yep, sucks to be you or your
faux "X-tian" wife.
Unlike you, they actually bother to spend some time living in *this* world.
That & a penny'll get ya squat, liar king. Next.
A penny is a gross overestimation of the worth of *your* dreck.
Then stop buying it from me. As long as you want me to spoon-feed ya,
I will. Next.
KK
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "somesappywriter " |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
23 Jul 2004 03:05:31 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jul 2004 06:21:21 -0700, (Krazy K)
wrote:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkzn5uz0st.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkoembfmm7.fsf@fnord.io.com>...
youngopinions@aol.com (J Young) writes:
[..........................]
My province? You're the one calling these people killers, not me.
Sorry, but that's your selective reading problem, as usual. I'm just
stating a fact -- your little charade won't be appreciated by those
people you're so eager to smear because of my association with them.
You can run away again, anonymous coward.
I don't know what you're association is but my sympathies are with the
people of Hazard. What exactly do consider anonymous? Perhaps I could
change my name to Somekindofwriter, or Snake955, or Loosebowels. If I
posted along your line of thinking, that wouldn't be an issue, would
it? You're a full of crap person who gets exposed a little more each
time you write.
I doubt anyone in Hazard, or anywhere else in the region, could care
less about your mental "disability". One detail you overlook in your
rant, though: "Somesappywriter" has a real name, and I know it. (For
reasons obvious to everyone but you and your comrades, she's not giving
it out to just anyone, and I'm not betraying her trust in me by
revealing it. I look forward to your creating some extensive *and*
fact-free fantasies about that information.)
Guess what, everybody has a real name. What I need to know is why when
people agree with you, anonymity is okay "for obvious reasons", but if
someone disagrees with you, they're "anonymous cowards"( even if they
post their real name but don't post all the information any good ID
theft person could use ).Also, I'm not asking for Kris Blake's real
name; if she wants to reveal it, that's her business.This is a
discussion group, we're not signing any legal documents in this forum.
Even a schmuck like *you* might have a legitimate reason for hiding behind
an alias, but since all appearances point to the conclusion that you're
just interested in trying to annoy people while ducking the responsibility
for your actions, even you should be able to figure out why you get very
little respect. That you don't isn't anyone else's problem, little
dropout.
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
Nice rant, anonymous kindergarten reject...a long line of uneducated
hillbillies? Hmmm...my maternal grandfather was a postmaster of the coal camp
in which I was born, and later the operator of the town's...
<snip>
LOL. Spare us the scenes from "my humble life", 'kay? You've *nothing*
to be proud of;
Oh, no? Why shouldn't be proud of the fact that he's a wonderful human
being, with a heart and compassion the size of Texas?
(
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
20 Jul 2004 12:19:00 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in
news:9c2d0f9a.0407200615.3860331c@posting.google.com:
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity.
perhaps that's how *you* saw it.
but then you refused to comment on many occasions when, aftr catching you in
a blatant lie or misrepresentation, i politely asked you to back your false
claim (thus giving you the chance to gracefully withdraw it). how would you
describe your actions?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marie Antoinette" |
|
| Title: Re: Anonymity ( and respect ) |
21 Jul 2004 12:58:04 PM |
|
|
(J Young) wrote in message news:<9c2d0f9a.0407200615.3860331c@posting.google.com>...
There you have it. Pat Humphrey offers some babbling ***** when
asked a direct question about anonymity. Bottom line for Pat Humphrey
is anonymity is okay if you agree with HIS point of view, or if you're
some trailer trash that he has an on-line relationship with. All
others are cowards. Respect? Let's see. He comes from a long line of
uneducated hillbillies and acts as if going to college was some big
deal.He deserts his community as soon as he does "better" himself,
returning only to visit; hence the Houston address. Takes a job,
instead of going into business for himself, and promptly leaves his
post for unknown reasons. Now he lives with his truck-driver wife,
with no kids of his own, hundreds of miles from the place he calls
home. This somehow is not the kind of person from whom I would seek
respect.Best if he starts respecting himself.Sorry I will not be able
to respond immediately to some predictable "counter-points", but I
will be away a few days( taking care of some REAL business)
You nailed 'er, JY. But this is only the half of it. The first thing
they do to their political enemies in here is to start in with a
forensic examination of posting data and forwarding bogus complaints
to IPs like a Tag Team on crystal meth. The "cliques" which form in
these newsgroups, and talk.abortion is not unique here, are, as gramps
used to tell me, as tight as a bull's ***** at fly time.
Anyway, it would appear that these leftist "love-ins" in these
newsgroups lack only condoms and a crash pad to consummate the
arrangements. Hee hee! I have a hunch that between about a dozen of
'em, more private e-mails fly every day than snowflakes on Everest.
This is w | |
