| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
08 Jul 2005 02:51:36 PM |
| Object: |
another whute house press scandal ??? |
a major white house figure is involved in a major scandal.
why is the white house press corps ignoring the story?
for the 4th time AFTER his lawyer admitted carl rove was one of cooper's
sources, no member of the white house press corps has asked a question
about rove's role.
this is what happens when the government controls the press.
.
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
08 Jul 2005 07:27:52 PM |
|
|
On 8 Jul 2005 19:51:36 GMT,
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
A major white house figure is involved in a major scandal.
Why is the white house press corps ignoring the story?
For the 4th time AFTER his lawyer admitted carl rove was one
of Cooper's sources, no member of the white house press corps
has asked a question about Rove's role.
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
AND, of course, there is the orchestrated THUGGERY done for
Bush on Thanksgiving, 2000, in which vote-counters in Dade County
were *intimidated* out of continuing the count --- which was far WORSE
and *more* criminal that Watergate. Mentioned ONCE on ABC's Nightly
News, and then dropped like a hot coal by the media.
Where were Woodward & Bernstein when the country REALLY
needed them -- more than ever???
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
= = = =
Of paramount relevance to all Americans:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/18/131144/051
http:/downingstreetmemo.com/
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/
Some GOOD news!! While in Washington State last week,
I was heartened to see that voting booths are being SCRAPPED
altogether, and that ALL ballots henceforth must be MAILED in.
And if *that* spreads nationwide, that will put an END to "Black
Box Voting!"
I'm not sure if that only applied to Yakima County (where I
saw the piece on TV), or was a statewide action... but either
way, it's a great start!!
Encourage your state to follow that vital lead!
Let's make our elections HONEST!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
08 Jul 2005 10:14:59 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
AND, of course, there is the orchestrated THUGGERY done for
Bush on Thanksgiving, 2000, in which vote-counters in Dade County
were *intimidated* out of continuing the count --- which was far WORSE
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link, Childunce.
and *more* criminal that Watergate. Mentioned ONCE on ABC's Nightly
News, and then dropped like a hot coal by the media.
Where were Woodward & Bernstein when the country REALLY
needed them -- more than ever???
Boohooo! That rotten VRWC now secretly controls ALL of
the media!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
08 Jul 2005 11:14:16 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
Fascists hate a free press.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
08 Jul 2005 11:35:47 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
Fascists hate a free press.
Exactly how is anybody's freedom to publish or
broadcast anything being blocked in any way? FYI
freedom of the press doesn't require others to act as
patsies for particular members of the press.
You alarmist libs accuse people of fascism simply
because they don't invite more shrill insults. And you
wonder why nobody takes your allegations seriously.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 11:31:48 AM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
Fascists hate a free press.
Exactly how is anybody's freedom to publish or
broadcast anything being blocked in any way?
"should have had her press pass revoked"
FYI
freedom of the press doesn't require others to act as
patsies for particular members of the press.
Apparently it does.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 12:01:08 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
Fascists hate a free press.
Exactly how is anybody's freedom to publish or
broadcast anything being blocked in any way?
"should have had her press pass revoked"
That wouldn't stop her from writing, dumbass. Just that
she'd no longer get front row seats and be handed
mudpiles to sling at Bush.
FYI
freedom of the press doesn't require others to act as
patsies for particular members of the press.
Apparently it does.
No it doesn't. If somebody comes to your house and
shits on the dinner table, they can't expect to be invited
back again, can they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 01:42:51 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, but she tries to pass
herself off as a reporter. That crusty old battleax should
have had her press pass revoked long ago.
Fascists hate a free press.
Exactly how is anybody's freedom to publish or
broadcast anything being blocked in any way?
"should have had her press pass revoked"
That wouldn't stop her from writing, dumbass.
Censorship doesn't prevent newspapers from publishing.
It limits the content.
Just that
she'd no longer get front row seats and be handed
mudpiles to sling at Bush.
Maybe Bush should stop providing so many mudpiles.
FYI
freedom of the press doesn't require others to act as
patsies for particular members of the press.
Apparently it does.
No it doesn't.
And yet we see the neocons controlling the media and limiting what is
published.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 03:23:27 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:14:59 -0700,
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, ...
ROTFL!!!!!! Any 10 words of "left-wing" *opinion* is worth more
than any given 1,000 words of *right-wing* hate-swill and cluelessness.
...but she tries to pass herself off as a reporter.
Yeah. Funny how real reporters manage to DO that. (LOL!!!)
That crusty old battleax should have had her press pass revoked
long ago.
LOL!!! The TRUTH hurts, doesn't it? That's what you get for
subscribing to the idiocies of today's "conservatives."
AND, of course, there is the orchestrated THUGGERY done for
Bush on Thanksgiving, 2000, in which vote-counters in Dade County
were *intimidated* out of continuing the count --- which was far WORSE
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
...and *more* criminal that Watergate. Mentioned ONCE on ABC's
Nightly News, and then dropped like a hot coal by the media.
Where were Woodward & Bernstein when the country REALLY
needed them -- more than ever???
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
= = = =
Of paramount relevance to all Americans:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/18/131144/051
http:/downingstreetmemo.com/
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/
Some GOOD news!! While in Washington State last week,
I was heartened to see that voting booths are being SCRAPPED
altogether, and that ALL ballots henceforth must be MAILED in.
And if *that* spreads nationwide, that will put an END to "Black
Box Voting!"
I'm not sure if that only applied to Yakima County (where I
saw the piece on TV), or was a statewide action... but either
way, it's a great start!!
Encourage your state to follow that vital lead!
Let's make our elections HONEST!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 11:45:00 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, ...
ROTFL!!!!!! Any 10 words of "left-wing" *opinion* is worth more
than any given 1,000 words of *right-wing* hate-swill and cluelessness.
...but she tries to pass herself off as a reporter.
Yeah. Funny how real reporters manage to DO that. (LOL!!!)
THAT is what you call a real reporter?!!? A sour old *****
with a pad and pencil? LOL
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link, you lazy fart. And it had better have some
credible sources if you expect to be taken seriously.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
09 Jul 2005 12:19:54 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 09:45:00 -0700,
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Good riddance to that cackling old hag. The crap she
writes is pure left-wing opinion, ...
ROTFL!!!!!! Any 10 words of "left-wing" *opinion* is worth
more than any given 1,000 words of *right-wing* hate-swill and
cluelessness.
...but she tries to pass herself off as a reporter.
Yeah. Funny how real reporters manage to DO that. (LOL!!!)
THAT is what you call a real reporter?!!? A sour old *****
with a pad and pencil? LOL
No. A very ASTUTE and EXPERIENCED reporter who knows
how to ask pointed and relevant questions. The moral equivilant of
that which would have you shunning crosses, sunlight, and wooden
stakes if you were Dracula. Bigots can't STAND relevant & pointed
questions... and FACTS.
She's infinitely beyond the league of losers like you who are
IGNORANT enough to fall for the lies and bigotries of today's
neocons.
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
= = = =
Of paramount relevance to all Americans:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/18/131144/051
http:/downingstreetmemo.com/
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/
Some GOOD news!! While in Washington State in late
June, 2005, I was heartened to see that voting booths are
being SCRAPPED altogether, and that ALL ballots hence-
forth must be MAILED in. And if *that* spreads nationwide,
that will put an END to "Black Box Voting!"
I'm not sure if that only applied to Yakima County (where I
saw the piece on TV), or was a statewide action... but either
way, it's a great start!!
Encourage your state to follow that vital lead!
Let's make our elections HONEST!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:17:29 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
You expect me to search though Google to find your anti-
Republican mudslinging?!?
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:19:45 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in
news:43p2d1pl3ucmiagvnidpelqmvled5sng5f@4ax.com:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
You expect me to search though Google to find
he posted proof of his claim. your response demonstrated your dishonesty.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:33:16 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
You expect me to search though Google to find
he posted proof of his claim.
Where? All I see is a headline. Admittedly my news
server sometimes misses posts. But after I asked for a
link, he said "No need".
your response demonstrated your dishonesty.
No, his "No need" response demonstrated his laziness.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:49:14 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in
news:n5q2d1p3uvsmta1ie4mfbhigcumnk17mkk@4ax.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to
ignore, since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of
Watergate has become.
You expect me to search though Google to find
he posted proof of his claim.
Where?
he told you already, as did others.
you'd appear less dishonest if you just ran away since i doubt anyone
expects you to demonstrate any character.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:46:54 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in
news:n5q2d1p3uvsmta1ie4mfbhigcumnk17mkk@4ax.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to
ignore, since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of
Watergate has become.
You expect me to search though Google to find
he posted proof of his claim.
Where? All I see is a headline. Admittedly my news
server sometimes misses posts. But after I asked for a
link, he said "No need".
your response demonstrated your dishonesty.
No, his "No need" response demonstrated his laziness.
and your stupidity...
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:50:08 PM |
|
|
BOB <sd@sd.net> wrote in news:Xns968F77DA1CD6BSD@68.6.19.6:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in
news:n5q2d1p3uvsmta1ie4mfbhigcumnk17mkk@4ax.com:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to
ignore, since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of
Watergate has become.
You expect me to search though Google to find
he posted proof of his claim.
Where? All I see is a headline. Admittedly my news
server sometimes misses posts. But after I asked for a
link, he said "No need".
your response demonstrated your dishonesty.
No, his "No need" response demonstrated his laziness.
and your stupidity...
Oops, that should have said "or', not "and". My goof.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 02:11:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:17:29 -0700,
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
You expect me to search though Google...
No. I expect you to have enough of a working brain to find the post i
just named, above, which has been posted within the last day or so to
these SAME crossposted groups.
However, since you're enough of a social retard to have no regard for
personal liberties, I guess having that capability would be asking too
much of you.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 01:28:15 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:17:29 -0700, Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Foxtrot" <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Oooh goody, another zany liberal conspiracy theory! Let's
see a link.
<sigh> No matter HOW many times I post it, you loons live in
DENIAL of it. It's no "theory," idiot. ABC's report put OMELET
all over that act of vicious and dishonest thuggery.
See my post entitled:
REPUBLICAN DIRTY TRICKS
BOMBSHELL !!!
It contains all the proof than any HONEST person would need.
Post a link.
No need. I've put up the ENTIRE post, verbatim, just as the
story was aired.. Which I'm sure you'll dishonestly continue to ignore,
since it shows just how rotten-to-the-core the party of Watergate has
become.
You expect me to search though Google to find your anti-
Republican mudslinging?!?
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to search
through Google to find a post when the subject has been given to you,
Google has a search engine to do that for you. (It took all of 0.12
seconds, by the way.) If you are too lazy to fill out the search
parameters for Google, here is the exact link:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=TALK.ABORTION&as_usubject=REPUBLICAN+DIRTY+TRICKS+BOMBSHELL&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=10&as_maxm=7&as_maxy=2005&safe=off
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 02:22:06 PM |
|
|
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to search
through Google to find a post when the subject has been given to you,
When somebody asks you for a link to back up a
claim, you post the link. What's wrong with that?
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Does posting a bunch of acronyms after your name
make you feel important? Let me guess. National
pool of Dipshits, Jokers with Fat Rear-ends and Goofs
with Whopping Attitudes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 02:35:08 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:22:06 -0700, Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Galen Hekhuis < > wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to search
through Google to find a post when the subject has been given to you,
When somebody asks you for a link to back up a
claim, you post the link. What's wrong with that?
Well, when they supply an actual link, you still have to click on it or
look it up or something. Posting the subject does involve another step, I
grant you, but in my mind there is little difference between them other
than that. It's kind of like asking for a news report and instead someone
supplies you with the name of the article and the publication in which it
appeared. It may not be precisely what you asked for but it certainly
allows you to find it. Of course, if your main objective is to whine
rather than to find things out, I can see where that would be an opening.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Does posting a bunch of acronyms after your name
make you feel important? Let me guess. National
pool of Dipshits, Jokers with Fat Rear-ends and Goofs
with Whopping Attitudes.
Not even close.
NpD My first and most cherished degree. Actually it stands for No
particular Degree. When they put together the University of Virginia phone
book they had a blank for honorifics and such. One doctor tried "Wizard,:"
but that was too obvious and they caught it. The more subtle NpD made it
however, and it sure did impress the post-docs on the floor.
JFR I am a Junior Forest Ranger with a badge from Smokey (the) Bear
Headquarters to prove it.
GWA Gimps With Attitude Hey, we didn't earn our disability checks, but
you better not be late with them. Enough said.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 05:03:34 PM |
|
|
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:0lt2d1h9kcpdno29fvf32b7rguin5cbj9q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:22:06 -0700, Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to
search through Google to find a post when the subject has been given
to you,
When somebody asks you for a link to back up a
claim, you post the link. What's wrong with that?
Well, when they supply an actual link, you still have to click on it
or look it up or something. Posting the subject does involve another
step, I grant you, but in my mind there is little difference between
them other than that. It's kind of like asking for a news report and
instead someone supplies you with the name of the article and the
publication in which it appeared. It may not be precisely what you
asked for but it certainly allows you to find it. Of course, if your
main objective is to whine rather than to find things out, I can see
where that would be an opening.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Does posting a bunch of acronyms after your name
make you feel important? Let me guess. National
pool of Dipshits, Jokers with Fat Rear-ends and Goofs
with Whopping Attitudes.
Not even close.
NpD My first and most cherished degree. Actually it stands for No
particular Degree. When they put together the University of Virginia
phone book they had a blank for honorifics and such. One doctor tried
"Wizard,:" but that was too obvious and they caught it. The more
subtle NpD made it however, and it sure did impress the post-docs on
the floor.
JFR I am a Junior Forest Ranger with a badge from Smokey (the) Bear
Headquarters to prove it.
GWA Gimps With Attitude Hey, we didn't earn our disability checks,
but you better not be late with them. Enough said.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
ghekhuis@earthlink.net
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
You are A-OK in my book Galen, with or without the "degrees". I'm
certainly glad to have you with us on the pro-choice side. Your posts
and responses rule! Keep up the good work for the good cause. :O))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 05:16:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:03:34 GMT, BOB <sd@sd.net> wrote:
Galen Hekhuis < > wrote in
news:0lt2d1h9kcpdno29fvf32b7rguin5cbj9q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:22:06 -0700, Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Galen Hekhuis < > wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to
search through Google to find a post when the subject has been given
to you,
When somebody asks you for a link to back up a
claim, you post the link. What's wrong with that?
Well, when they supply an actual link, you still have to click on it
or look it up or something. Posting the subject does involve another
step, I grant you, but in my mind there is little difference between
them other than that. It's kind of like asking for a news report and
instead someone supplies you with the name of the article and the
publication in which it appeared. It may not be precisely what you
asked for but it certainly allows you to find it. Of course, if your
main objective is to whine rather than to find things out, I can see
where that would be an opening.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Does posting a bunch of acronyms after your name
make you feel important? Let me guess. National
pool of Dipshits, Jokers with Fat Rear-ends and Goofs
with Whopping Attitudes.
Not even close.
NpD My first and most cherished degree. Actually it stands for No
particular Degree. When they put together the University of Virginia
phone book they had a blank for honorifics and such. One doctor tried
"Wizard,:" but that was too obvious and they caught it. The more
subtle NpD made it however, and it sure did impress the post-docs on
the floor.
JFR I am a Junior Forest Ranger with a badge from Smokey (the) Bear
Headquarters to prove it.
GWA Gimps With Attitude Hey, we didn't earn our disability checks,
but you better not be late with them. Enough said.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
You are A-OK in my book Galen, with or without the "degrees". I'm
certainly glad to have you with us on the pro-choice side. Your posts
and responses rule! Keep up the good work for the good cause. :O))
Thanks. I have to admit I get a little tickled when some blowhard gets all
huffy and starts sneering and making fun of the letters after my name. It
does seem to shut them up, though. I didn't expect that when I began
tacking on the letters.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 06:40:24 PM |
|
|
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:k573d1lbuv3tm3cui6ov8ltk86v3uhvcrj@4ax.com:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:03:34 GMT, BOB <sd@sd.net> wrote:
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:0lt2d1h9kcpdno29fvf32b7rguin5cbj9q@4ax.com:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:22:06 -0700, Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com>
wrote:
Galen Hekhuis <ghekhuis@earthlink.net> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Let me explain something to you, Childunce. Traditionally
when somebody wants to make a point, they present
their case to the other side. They don't make whopping
allegations then tell others to find the evidence. Sheesh
Let me explain something to *you*, "foxtrot." You don't have to
search through Google to find a post when the subject has been
given to you,
When somebody asks you for a link to back up a
claim, you post the link. What's wrong with that?
Well, when they supply an actual link, you still have to click on it
or look it up or something. Posting the subject does involve
another step, I grant you, but in my mind there is little difference
between them other than that. It's kind of like asking for a news
report and instead someone supplies you with the name of the article
and the publication in which it appeared. It may not be precisely
what you asked for but it certainly allows you to find it. Of
course, if your main objective is to whine rather than to find
things out, I can see where that would be an opening.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
Does posting a bunch of acronyms after your name
make you feel important? Let me guess. National
pool of Dipshits, Jokers with Fat Rear-ends and Goofs
with Whopping Attitudes.
Not even close.
NpD My first and most cherished degree. Actually it stands for No
particular Degree. When they put together the University of
Virginia phone book they had a blank for honorifics and such. One
doctor tried "Wizard,:" but that was too obvious and they caught it.
The more subtle NpD made it however, and it sure did impress the
post-docs on the floor.
JFR I am a Junior Forest Ranger with a badge from Smokey (the) Bear
Headquarters to prove it.
GWA Gimps With Attitude Hey, we didn't earn our disability checks,
but you better not be late with them. Enough said.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
ghekhuis@earthlink.net
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
You are A-OK in my book Galen, with or without the "degrees". I'm
certainly glad to have you with us on the pro-choice side. Your posts
and responses rule! Keep up the good work for the good cause. :O))
Thanks. I have to admit I get a little tickled when some blowhard
gets all huffy and starts sneering and making fun of the letters after
my name. It does seem to shut them up, though. I didn't expect that
when I began tacking on the letters.
Ignore the idiots.
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
ghekhuis@earthlink.net
Illiterate? Write for FREE help
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 06:15:31 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005 19:51:36 GMT,
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
A major white house figure is involved in a major scandal.
Why is the white house press corps ignoring the story?
For the 4th time AFTER his lawyer admitted carl rove was one
of Cooper's sources, no member of the white house press corps
has asked a question about Rove's role.
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Likewise, your opinion that the
media supports Bush says more about you than it does about them.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
ROFLMAO! The biggest White House press corps tradition was her peers
laughing AT her, since JFK.
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
Just like you probably got sent to the back of the room in the third
grade for saying "pee-pee" and giggling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 09:24:35 PM |
|
|
<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005 19:51:36 GMT,
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
A major white house figure is involved in a major scandal.
Why is the white house press corps ignoring the story?
For the 4th time AFTER his lawyer admitted carl rove was one
of Cooper's sources, no member of the white house press corps
has asked a question about Rove's role.
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Likewise, your opinion that the
media supports Bush says more about you than it does about them.
It's pretty obvious that the media is pro-Bush. Just look at all the
coverage the Downing Street memo has received in the media.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
ROFLMAO! The biggest White House press corps tradition was her peers
laughing AT her, since JFK.
And so the right-wing moron betrays his bigotry.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: another whute house press scandal ??? |
10 Jul 2005 06:40:21 PM |
|
|
On 10 Jul 2005 16:15:31 -0700,
<awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
James G. Keegan Jr. <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
A major white house figure is involved in a major scandal.
Why is the white house press corps ignoring the story?
For the 4th time AFTER his lawyer admitted carl rove was one
of Cooper's sources, no member of the white house press corps
has asked a question about Rove's role.
This is what happens when the government controls the press.
And does it ever! The press is right squarely in the Republicans'
(and Bush's) pocket.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Likewise, your opinion that the
media supports Bush says more about you than it does about them.
Yeah. It says that I'm far more *astute* than they are, or they'd
have the guts to take him to task for his warmongering and all his
other fiascos and anti-personal-liberty/RRR cult-coddling ideologies.
For example, look at Helen Thomas, who for decades was in the
front tier of Presidential press conferences, and able to ask the
first question. It had become a tradition.
ROFLMAO! The biggest White House press corps tradition
was her peers laughing AT her, since JFK.
Uh-huh. And just what reputable CITE of such a thing (not counting
Fox News or some other such Bush-toadying outfit) can you provide us?
But after she spoke her mind -- and the TRUTH -- that G.W. Bush
is the **worst** President America has ever had... thin-skinned and
cowardly Bush had her relegated to the BACK of the room, and she
*never* is called upon anymore.
<Stupidity-flush. No facts lost.>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
= = = =
Of paramount relevance to all Americans:
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/18/131144/051
http:/downingstreetmemo.com/
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/
Some GOOD news!! While in Washington State last week,
I was heartened to see that voting booths are being SCRAPPED
altogether, and that ALL ballots henceforth must be MAILED in.
And if *that* spreads nationwide, that will put an END to "Black
Box Voting!"
I'm not sure if that only applied to Yakima County (where I
saw the piece on TV), or was a statewide action... but either
way, it's a great start!!
Encourage your state to follow that vital lead!
Let's make our elections HONEST!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
