| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
16 Jul 2003 10:05:34 AM |
| Object: |
ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:39:48 GMT,
"Renêï" <Anti-Choice_Ignorance_Unabated@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
If you were actually "pro-choice" (and clearly you are not)...
...then you would respect that CHOICE.
Opting to impose HARDSHIP upon people is NOT a valid choice.
Too bad you're too short of neurons to be able to comprehend that.
But guess what? MOST people have NO trouble understanding that.
And you think deciding to TERMINATE a person's life (as you
[Pro-Choicers] approve of) DOESN'T impose any hardship upon them??
(1) The ONLY person present is the woman whose life is put
BACK on track -- her well-being and full range of future
opportunities fully and immediately RESTORED to PRE-
ill-rimed-pregnancy levels -- by the beneficial REMEDY
of abortion.
(2) The ONLY thing that gets "terminated" is an entitiy that is
the EQIVALENT, in all significant ways, to the QUADRILLION
gametes (Stage One of the reproductive process) which are
willfully aborted DAILY, worldwide, via male masturbation.
Which ALSO... *just* like the z/e/f stages, are human, unique,
**alive** (SO MUCH for the Anti-Choicer's *stupid* claim that
life begins at fertilization!), and POTENTIAL people.
(3) Since z/e/fs that normally get aborted are terminated 'WAY
before conscious awareness becomes possible, they most
ASSUREDLY don't give a rat's ***** about that, much LESS
undergo any (LOL!!!) "hardship."
However, YOU and your hateful and ignorant ilk support a truly
LOATHESOME agenda that seeks to impose IMMENSE hardship
upon no fewer than tens of MILLIONS of **real** people --women --
by FORCING childbirth upon them. AGAINST their will.
Resulting in the DENIAL of their rights... their RELEGATION to
second-class-citizen status... their INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE to
mere, NON-sentient developing entities which are, in all important
ways, equivalent to sperm and ova (human, unique, NON-sentient,
a stage of development without which NO births would occur --
and alive); entities which the WOMEN would very properly, under
the circumstances, regard to be parasitic. Further manifestations of
that hardship would be the DISRUPTION of their well-being, both
short-term and long-term (as in, for decades or a lifetime)... and
the DESTRUCTION of countless of their opportunities.
Thus, you are UTTERLY without excuse, in your support of such
a scum-of-the-earth agenda.
One cannot help but be AMAZED that anyone ignorant enough
to be oblivious to ALL these facts (below) could even function in
modern society. Or could be so very HATEFUL.
-- Craig Chilton
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
-- Originally posted to alt.abortion & talk.abortion
on Aug. 13, 2000, and updated since.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
| User: "Mizzyandrea" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 12:49:28 AM |
|
|
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
******************************************************************
True...... America has evolved and individual rights are respected. That's why
abortion is LEGAL........ to criminalize it would turn women into slaves of
their own biology.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
16 Jul 2003 11:07:44 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:52:45 GMT,
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Blacks are PEOPLE. G/z/e/fs are NOT.
Not AT ALL bright, are you?
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Galen Hekhuis" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 08:37:11 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 01:52:45 GMT, "Barbara Walker"
<barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote:
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
And I'll wager that Barbara would have owned some if she were around then.
The hell with personal responsibility, "everyone else was doing it."
Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA
A penny saved gathers no moss
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Sanders-" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 01:00:17 PM |
|
|
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master. Humm
sounds just like what your lot want to bring back. To force woman
into servitude to be incubators for the states mandated breeding
stock. Gee we have come a long way baby. The problem is the time
is going backwards not forwards.
The 13-15 Amendment were expressly made to not allow your lot
to force them to be incubators or enslaved, your lot want to bring it
back, on women.
Isn't that special.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 02:42:12 PM |
|
|
"David Sanders-" <Sandrss@tquest.com> wrote in message
news:3F16DA79.8DCECF7A@tquest.com...
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master.
That's a bit of a stretch on your part, but sufficiently close enough to
continue the discussion.
So the next thing that happened is that society, which had formerly viewed
slavery as morally acceptable, decided that it was no longer acceptable, and
decided to outlaw the practice. Similarly, the long-term plan (which the
pro-abortionists oppose, of course) is to do with abortion what we did with
our laws allowing the ownership of slaves - make it illegal.
Barbara Walker
Irving, Tx..
.
|
|
|
| User: "JC Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
21 Jul 2003 08:28:10 PM |
|
|
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:o_CRa.84642$H17.26352@sccrnsc02...
"David Sanders-" <Sandrss@tquest.com> wrote in message
news:3F16DA79.8DCECF7A@tquest.com...
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master.
That's a bit of a stretch on your part, but sufficiently close enough to
continue the discussion.
So the next thing that happened is that society, which had formerly viewed
slavery as morally acceptable, decided that it was no longer acceptable,
and
decided to outlaw the practice.
No, us yanks had to kick your confederate ***** to get you to give up your
slaves. And you still treated blacks as sub-humans for decades to follow.
-JC
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 02:59:06 PM |
|
|
"Barbara Walker" <barbara.walker4@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:o_CRa.84642$H17.26352@sccrnsc02...
"David Sanders-" <Sandrss@tquest.com> wrote in message
news:3F16DA79.8DCECF7A@tquest.com...
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master.
That's a bit of a stretch on your part, but sufficiently close enough to
continue the discussion.
So the next thing that happened is that society, which had formerly viewed
slavery as morally acceptable, decided that it was no longer acceptable,
and
decided to outlaw the practice. Similarly, the long-term plan (which the
pro-abortionists oppose, of course) is to do with abortion what we did
with
our laws allowing the ownership of slaves - make it illegal.
Barbara Walker
Irving, Tx..
In case you missed it, your feeble assault failed miserably just a couple
weeks ago.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Sanders-" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 04:34:07 PM |
|
|
Barbara Walker wrote:
"David Sanders-" <Sandrss@tquest.com> wrote in message
news:3F16DA79.8DCECF7A@tquest.com...
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master.
That's a bit of a stretch on your part, but sufficiently close enough to
continue the discussion.
So the next thing that happened is that society, which had formerly viewed
slavery as morally acceptable, decided that it was no longer acceptable, and
decided to outlaw the practice. Similarly, the long-term plan (which the
pro-abortionists oppose, of course) is to do with abortion what we did with
our laws allowing the ownership of slaves - make it illegal.
Your cutting posts is contextual subterfuge, is nothing less than lying
Babs, but then you have been caught in more lies in just this thread.
The fact is you want to make women into slaves for some obsession
over tissue that one day would become a baby, and your obsession is
the Ahhhh factor. You see these little squirming ***** factories as
obsessively cute, and wish to assign special rights to this tissue over
the slave made to carry it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lou Lou" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
18 Jul 2003 06:32:34 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:34:07 GMT, David Sanders- <Sandrss@tquest.com>
wrote:
Barbara Walker wrote:
"David Sanders-" <Sandrss@tquest.com> wrote in message
news:3F16DA79.8DCECF7A@tquest.com...
Barbara Walker wrote:
"James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message
Rape and murder are crimes. Abortion is not.
At one time keeping black slaves wasn't a crime either.
Yes the were thought of as nothing more than incubators for the masters
children, and breeding stock to raise children for the master.
That's a bit of a stretch on your part, but sufficiently close enough to
continue the discussion.
So the next thing that happened is that society, which had formerly viewed
slavery as morally acceptable, decided that it was no longer acceptable, and
decided to outlaw the practice. Similarly, the long-term plan (which the
pro-abortionists oppose, of course) is to do with abortion what we did with
our laws allowing the ownership of slaves - make it illegal.
Your cutting posts is contextual subterfuge, is nothing less than lying
Babs, but then you have been caught in more lies in just this thread.
The fact is you want to make women into slaves for some obsession
over tissue that one day would become a baby, and your obsession is
the Ahhhh factor. You see these little squirming ***** factories as
obsessively cute, and wish to assign special rights to this tissue over
the slave made to carry it.
Virtually all snipping I've seen in usenet is plain penis envy. And it
doesn't come from women. Yo, Barbara, it's about time to slap your
***** onto the scanner.
-
Lou Ziffer
BBQs'r'us
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jake Nichols" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
16 Jul 2003 09:40:00 PM |
|
|
RenêÄ wrote:
But of course you pro-abortionists
don't consider any sort of a hardship upon that little person to terminate
his or her life, eh Craig?
Rene.. I am going to tell you a little story.. I hope that you will
actually read and follow along with me, okay?
Starting before I can remember, I was raped by my father... it didn't
stop when he was arrested.. it didn't stop when the military oh so
kindly put him in jail for 2 years and it didn't stop when the military
bounced his rank down 2 levels.. it didn't stop when he got back out of
prison and started having contact with the family again.
It DID finally stop when I was about 15.. after I started getting my
period.
WHat do YOU think should have happened had he gotten me pregnant? Do you
think that a 15 year old who had been the victim of his abuse for YEARS
should have been *FORCED* to carry that pregnancy to term and given
birth to his child?
What do you think would have mentally happened to that 15 year old girl?
Do you think she would have lived 9 months knowing that not only was she
the victim of HIS abuse.. but that she now had to give birth to his child?
Do you think that 15 year old kid would have had any love for that
child? How do you think that 15 year olds mother would have felt knowing
that her little girl was FORCED to give birth to the child of the man
who systematically raped her for years?
What do you think might have happened to that child? The bilogical
mother would have hated it.. the grandmother would have hated it.. the
courts would have had additional proof that the abuse was taking place.
in the end, the child would have been given up to an agency who KNEW,
thanks to the courts, that the child was the result of a man raping his
daughter and getting her pregnant.
What would have happened to that child, 20/30 years later, when they
tried to find their biological mother and father? What do YOU think
would have happened to their mental well-being to learn that their
mother was a 15 year old raped by her father, and that the child was now
an inbred who was unwanted and unloved by the family because of the
stigma and psychological issues with how that kid was concieved?
What damage do you think would have happened to that child? or to that
child's adoptive family once they learned the story behind their birth?
In the case above, luckily I never got pregnant.
But take that case and turn it around onto someone who does NOT want the
child no matter what the circumstances surrounding the conception are.
Why do you feel they should be FORCED to go through with a pregnancy
when they do NOT want that child?
How do you think they will feel for that kid? Do you think, majically,
that they will love it just because they gave birth to it?
Nice dream world.. but it doesn't happen.. and why should many people's
lives be ruined by it, when long before it becomes a viable human being,
the pregnancy can be terminated?
Especially when there are already so many children out there in need of
parents and adopting?
20/20 did and interview with Anjelinia Jolie the other night.. and while
many people may not give what she says much thought, she did say
something that everone should take to heart.
Since she adopted Maddox, Barbara Walters asked her if she would want to
have children of her own. Her, AJ's reply was.. no, because that would
be one less child already out there that she could adopt.
My best friend was adopted.. she was given up for who knows what
reason.. but one of her brothers was adopted to.. him because the family
asked her adoptive father to take their child and give him a good family
since they couldn't.
What do you think would have happened in either case had they been left
with their biological families?
You MIGHT think this is an arguement for giving birth and then giving up
the child, but it isn't. It is just the opposite.
With so many kids already out there that need adoption.. WHY would you
advocate bringing MORE into the world who might end up being abused
themselves or given up to the state in the hopes that there will come
along a family who can or is willing to take care of them?
Rene.. how many children do you take care of as a foster parent? How
many have you adopted? If none, then maybe you should start there.. if
you have, then why do you feel that more kids should be brought into the
world just so society or other people should be forced to deal with
them, cause guess what.. the State is a shitty parent.
JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mizzyandrea" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 12:43:10 AM |
|
|
Why do you feel they should be FORCED to go through with a pregnancy
when they do NOT want that child?
*****************************************
PUNISHMENT........ they want to punish women for sex. Their use of terms like
"*****" and "*****" are dead giveaways, as to the motive behind this "embryo
love". They don't care about women.......and they don't care about children.
I don't even believe they care about embryos because you never see any of
those cocksuckers protesting around fertility clinics were thousands of frozen
embryos get destroyed all the time..........NO. What plages them is the idea
of women being sexually liberated.
You will notice that the same flaming assholes who are against abortion,
also get their gonands in knotts bitching about homosexuals.......WHY? Why
would they care? Know of any gay guys having abortions?
You would think they would have a profound reverence for gays since a gay man
is the LEAST likely male to cause the circumstances that would result in
abortions.
NO......it's all about controling the sex lives of strangers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 12:48:21 AM |
|
|
"Mizzyandrea" <mizzyandrea@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030717014310.02307.00000074@mb-m21.aol.com...
Why do you feel they should be FORCED to go through with a pregnancy
when they do NOT want that child?
*****************************************
PUNISHMENT........ they want to punish women for sex. Their use of terms
like
"*****" and "*****" are dead giveaways, as to the motive behind this
"embryo
love". They don't care about women.......and they don't care about
children.
I don't even believe they care about embryos because you never see any of
those cocksuckers protesting around fertility clinics were thousands of
frozen
embryos get destroyed all the time..........NO. What plages them is the
idea
of women being sexually liberated.
You will notice that the same flaming assholes who are against abortion,
also get their gonands in knotts bitching about homosexuals.......WHY?
Why
would they care? Know of any gay guys having abortions?
You would think they would have a profound reverence for gays since a gay
man
is the LEAST likely male to cause the circumstances that would result in
abortions.
Or how about the gay women? If a lesbian is pregnant, you KNOW it was
fucking planned!
NO......it's all about controling the sex lives of strangers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mizzyandrea" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 01:17:20 AM |
|
|
Or how about the gay women? If a lesbian is pregnant, you KNOW it was
fucking planned
*********************************************
Well, one of the problems I have with anti choicers is that they keep whining
about childless couples.............
There are thousands of children (REAL born children) residing in foster care
and institutions throughout the United States as of now......... not only do
these "childless couples" NOT want the older kids......... THESE cocksucking
maggot-fucking, anal fistulas are opposed to the adoption of children by gay
couples....... WHY?
BECAUSE they don't care about real children........or real women........or
real (born) human beings. They only care about their own pro-control
agendas....... they're BODY NAZIS........ they want to control the bodies of
total strangers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MyTwoAngels" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
18 Jul 2003 08:18:38 AM |
|
|
(Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307171053.54fe6a4d@posting.google.com>...
[...]
As usual, Mizzy, you have it ***** backwards.
Considering where you're coming from, emotionally, I'd say your world
is as small and ignisgificant as your ever pertruding hemorroids on
the ***** of which you refer to as your brain.
We're asking these women
No, you are DEMANDING these women...
to control their own bodies
to do as you wish...
before the fact, not after.
And just who the ***** are you to demand these women to do with their
bodies as you wish, wombless? Don't you have enough control over your
own body than to concern yourself with what other women do? Or is the
baroness of your womanhood getting the better of you?
Someone from
the Andromeda Galaxy reading the posts of you abortionists could only
conclude that these victimized women you refer to are all being
inseminated by dust mites in their mattresses or some such thing.
And why would their sex life be any concern of yours? You haven't one
to speak of? Or is it your over-sexed past is catching up to you in
the way of infertility and sexual prudery, and you need to pass the
baton of responsibility off to somebody else?
No,
Mizzy, the bottom line is your crowd wants avoid the natural
consequences of their own bad decisions and selfishness,
Since when is accepting the responsibility of parenthood such a bad
thing? The majority of us are proud parents, and for some,
grandparents too.
even if it
means killing another innocent human being.
That's YOUR delusion, and not our proclamation.
And you do this by using
words like "choice" and "fetus,"
Unlike you, we realise that pregnant women are the only individuals
that can truly assess their circumstances and decide for their given
situation, accordingly.
< words designed with one only purpose
in mind: To hide and obscure the horror and enormous evil that's in
fact taking place.
Defying you? Oh, heavens!
As for the issue of control of people's bodies, Mizzy, society does
that all the time.
But what makes your right to choose your own course of pregnancy
any more significant than my right to choose my own course of
pregnancy?
[...]
**Krisblake**
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Sanders-" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choice Craig blows a pro-abortion gasket again |
17 Jul 2003 12:55:17 PM |
|
|
RenêÄ wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3f18695a.9873898@netnews.mchsi.com...
Opting to impose HARDSHIP upon people is NOT a valid choice.
Too bad you're too short of neurons to be able to comprehend that.
But guess what? MOST people have NO trouble understanding that.
And you think deciding to TERMINATE a person's life (as you
[Pro-Choicers] approve of) DOESN'T impose any hardship upon them??
(1) The ONLY person present is the woman
No, there's also the abortionist-for-hire present, in addition to the small
person in the womb that he murders. But of course you pro-abortionists
don't consider any sort of a hardship upon that little person to terminate
his or her life, eh Craig?
Then again you have no problem with the forcing of the rape of
a woman for nine months, to have a fetus be in her without
ther consent. Just as the male who would not leave the female
when she said stop, and found that was rape.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tom_terrific" |
|
| Title: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ANTI-Choicer_"Ren=EA=EF"_PROVES_Her_Abject_Ignorance.?= |
18 Jul 2003 11:58:04 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton)made an attempt at logic when he wrote in message news:<3f18695a.9873898@netnews.mchsi.com>...
However, YOU and your hateful and ignorant ilk support a truly
LOATHESOME agenda that seeks to impose IMMENSE hardship
upon no fewer than tens of MILLIONS of **real** people --women --
by FORCING childbirth upon them. AGAINST their will.
Resulting in the DENIAL of their rights... their RELEGATION to
second-class-citizen status... their INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE to
mere, NON-sentient developing entities which are, in all important
ways, equivalent to sperm and ova (human, unique, NON-sentient,
a stage of development without which NO births would occur --
and alive); entities which the WOMEN would very properly, under
the circumstances, regard to be parasitic. Further manifestations of
that hardship would be the DISRUPTION of their well-being, both
short-term and long-term (as in, for decades or a lifetime)... and
the DESTRUCTION of countless of their opportunities.
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
first place huh Craigie. These women did it to themselves and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
impose a hardship on them. Now let's look at these alleged facts you
say are posted below.
Thus, you are UTTERLY without excuse, in your support of such
a scum-of-the-earth agenda.
One cannot help but be AMAZED that anyone ignorant enough
to be oblivious to ALL these facts (below) could even function in
modern society. Or could be so very HATEFUL.
-- Craig Chilton
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
What makes you think they have never experienced conscious awareness?
Remember, you are posting this as fact. You're looking at conjecture,
not fact.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
-- Originally posted to alt.abortion & talk.abortion
on Aug. 13, 2000, and updated since.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
I just love it when somebody throws facts at me and then blows it all
when they attempt to draw preconceived conclusions. You would have
done us all a favor if the fetus of your conclusions had been aborted
prior to committing it to print. People of your ilk are loathsome in
their attempt to justify murder when they should be protecting all
life rather than just life they approve of. You, sir, are the
parasite. Do we understand each other now.
In case you don't understand me, I won't ask for legislation
disallowing abortions but neither will I support legislation that
supports abortions. If people want to murder babies, then let their
ilk dispose of them in the manner they did before modern science gave
them an alternative.
Tom
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mizzyandrea" |
|
| Title: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ANTI-Choicer_"Ren=EA=EF"_PROVES_Her_Abject_Ignorance.?= |
18 Jul 2003 08:03:03 PM |
|
|
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
first place huh Craigie. These women did it to themselves and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
impose a hardship on them. Now let's look at these alleged facts you
say are posted below.
*******************************
No *****.......men get women pregnant and if you really wanna stop all
abortions, then you must take up the banner for mass castration! NO nutz, no
spermies to make women pregers........... IF you really wanna save all those
itty bitty "baaaaaaaaaaaabies", then start a movement to get all men
castrated........AND set the example!
Tell ya what, I'll help you out........ I'm sure I've get a set of nail
clippers....... I could lop off your little peas faster 'n spit dances on a hot
griddle.......AND from the sound of things, you'll never even miss 'm........
Listen, you misserable scab on the ***** of a syphilletic dog fucker........ It
does not matter how or why women become pregnant. If we don't want to be
pregnant......we will have abortions. Don't like it?..... go suck the snots
out of a mule's nose..........
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ANTI-Choicer_"Ren=EA=EF"_PROVES_Her_Abject_Ignorance.?= |
19 Jul 2003 01:13:12 PM |
|
|
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
first place huh Craigie.
No, but you want to impose the hardship of childbirth.
These women did it to themselves
Nope.
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Flannigan" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
19 Jul 2003 03:11:17 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfc1nn$apf$1@bolt.sonic.net...
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
first place huh Craigie.
No, but you want to impose the hardship of childbirth.
These women did it to themselves
Nope.
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of contempt -
as mindless wildebeest with no control over themselves or their own actions?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
19 Jul 2003 07:37:15 PM |
|
|
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
19 Jul 2003 10:12:34 PM |
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
Unless it's your pregnancy, you need to MYOFB.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we called
it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Busybody.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
19 Jul 2003 11:28:50 PM |
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in
news:e1oSa.95703$TJ.5487088@twister.austin.rr.com:
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
Unless it's your pregnancy, you need to MYOFB.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called
it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Busybody.
This abortion thread is the most boring and useless exchange I've ever
involved myself with.
Your anti-choice contributions undoubtedly added a lot to the boredom and
ussless exchanges.
I miss my old leftist friends from government and
philosophy issues. Honest people with brains.
Then you are obviously out of your element among them.
Goodbye.
Good riddance.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
20 Jul 2003 11:47:50 AM |
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:e1oSa.95703$TJ.5487088@twister.austin.rr.com...
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
Unless it's your pregnancy, you need to MYOFB.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called
it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Busybody.
This abortion thread is the most boring and useless exchange I've ever
involved myself with. I miss my old leftist friends from government and
philosophy issues. Honest people with brains. Goodbye.
Door... hit... *****...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ANTI-Choicer_"Ren=EA=EF"_PROVES_Her_Abject_Ignorance.?= |
20 Jul 2003 12:37:02 AM |
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message news:<n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Flannigan" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
20 Jul 2003 12:44:55 AM |
|
|
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate.
Thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Lampert" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
20 Jul 2003 10:36:06 PM |
|
|
Mike Flannigan wrote:
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate.
Thank you.
True to your lots continuos lying ways you're back.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Lampert" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
20 Jul 2003 11:02:35 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message news:<n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate
You two want to get a room, we don't want to see your redneck
mating calls, or you sexual displays.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
21 Jul 2003 07:47:33 AM |
|
|
"David Lampert" <Lampert@ubethere.com> wrote in message
news:3F1B68A5.C85D4F7C@ubethere.com...
osprey wrote:
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in
the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it
would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than
screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making
their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate
You two want to get a room, we don't want to see your redneck
mating calls, or you sexual displays.
Ever notice liberals get upset when two other people are in agreement, that
isn't in agreement with them. ROFL
You all are so much alike.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Lampert" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
22 Jul 2003 01:59:55 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"David Lampert" <Lampert@ubethere.com> wrote in message
news:3F1B68A5.C85D4F7C@ubethere.com...
osprey wrote:
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these women in
the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because it
would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than
screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making
their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of the
mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate
You two want to get a room, we don't want to see your redneck
mating calls, or you sexual displays.
Ever notice liberals get upset when two other people are in agreement, that
isn't in agreement with them. ROFL
You all are so much alike.
Ever notice how rednecks need to lump everyone into a box
so their tiny brains can put a label on them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: ANTI-Choicer "Renêï" PROVES Her Abject Ignorance. |
22 Jul 2003 03:29:23 PM |
|
|
"David Lampert" <Lampert@ubethere.com> wrote in message
news:3F1D8C13.50BDA9F8@ubethere.com...
Osprey wrote:
"David Lampert" <Lampert@ubethere.com> wrote in message
news:3F1B68A5.C85D4F7C@ubethere.com...
osprey wrote:
"Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<n4mSa.88546$hV.6259981@twister.austin.rr.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:bfco7q$7c8$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike Flannigan <mflannigan@jam.rr.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
tom_terrific <tomseaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I suppose we imposed the hardship of pregnancy on these
women in
the
and now you
want to excuse their murdering of their own infants because
it
would
Notice that the anti-abortion fanatic can do little more than
screech
hatred and lies and contempt for other people.
Notice how the pro-abortion fanatic's opinion of women is that
of
contempt -
By treating them with respect and like adults capable of making
their
own choices.
You're just another pro-liar *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
If she wants to make that choice then she needs to make it within
at
least
the first trimester, or later in cases that threaten the life of
the
mother.
But if you're going to try and tell me that a viable nine month
old is
expendable trash one minute and a miracle the next just because we
called it
a fetus before and a baby now because it just experienced a change
of
location then I'm afraid your going to have to sell that snake oil
to
the
fanatical morons on your side. *****.
Very well said, and very accurate
You two want to get a room, we don't want to see your redneck
mating calls, or you sexual displays.
Ever notice liberals get upset when two other people are in agreement,
that
isn't in agreement with them. ROFL
You all are so much alike.
Ever notice how rednecks need to lump everyone into a box
so their tiny brains can put a label on them.
redneck?
Oh brother...another bigot...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|