| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Dutch" |
| Date: |
25 Jan 2006 02:47:53 AM |
| Object: |
Are there any legitimate people here? |
I just wasted a couple days wrestling with a bunch of two-bit sophist trolls
who inhabit this newsgroup. Now that I have most of them them tucked away in
my killfile, are there any adults who are interested in having a serious,
adult discussion on some of the issues surrounding abortion?
.
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 08:59:41 AM |
|
|
On 26 Jan 2006 05:56:47 -0800, in alt.abortion with
message-id <1138283807.886488.76210@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
Great! I would classify myself as very reluctantly pro-choice. I am
absolutely of the belief that a fetus is a human being, I wish I didn't
think that way, but I can't help it. It seems as plain as the sun in the
sky.
Dutch, having a strong belief like that counts for nothing in this
newsgroup which is populated in part by people whose belief systems are
on different foundations from yours.
Here, you have to back up your assertions with facts and conclusions
deduced from facts, not from beliefs.
I'd be interested to know which of the following statements are
accepted by everyone here as facts, and which are disputed:
1. A child inherits half its DNA from its mother and the other half
from its father.
FAct.
2. A child's DNA is not identical to either its mother's or its
father's.
Fact
3. Every cell in a child's body contains the same DNA.
Normally fact.
4. The birth process does not alter a child's DNA.
Fact
5. The DNA of a fetus in the womb is the same as that of the child when
it is born.
Fact
6. The DNA of a fetus is fixed from the moment of conception, and
remains unaltered while in the womb.
Fact
7. A fetus develops from a zygote which has a full set of paired
chromosomes.
Not an issue
8. A zygote is formed by the union of two haploid cells which each
possess a single set of unpaired chromosomes.
Not an issue.
9. It is in the nature of a zygote to develop into a fetus which, if
carried to term, will result in a child being born.
Fact
10. Abortion involves interfering with the natural development so that
the pregnancy terminates early.
Fact
11. Medical staff performing the procedure to effect that interference
are protected against criminal prosecution for damage to the fetus or
the mother provided they comply with the law of the land regarding
abortions.
Belief. They cannot be prosecuted for performing an abortion but all
other medical standards apply.
12. The pregnant woman who consents to this procedure is protected
against criminal prosecution provided she complies with the law of the
land regarding abortions.
Fact
13. With the exception of China, no nation state forces a pregnant
woman to undergo an abortion.
Irrelevant. They do not where I live.
14. Every abortion represents, barring accident or miscarriage, at
least one less person walking this earth.
Fact. So does every menstrual period.
If it were possible for both sides of this argument to agree on some
facts, then it would be worth while to see what conclusions might be
deduced from those facts.
Unlikely, since one side is not interested in the facts.
Bryn
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
31 Jan 2006 02:55:46 PM |
|
|
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 05:56:47 -0800, wrote:
3. Every cell in a child's body contains the same DNA.
Normally fact.
Would you care to clarify that I might rephrase no 3 in a form that we
can agree on?
7. A fetus develops from a zygote which has a full set of paired
chromosomes.
Not an issue
8. A zygote is formed by the union of two haploid cells which each
possess a single set of unpaired chromosomes.
Not an issue.
I was listing facts prior to drawing any conclusions or inferences.
11. Medical staff performing the procedure to effect that interference
are protected against criminal prosecution for damage to the fetus or
the mother provided they comply with the law of the land regarding
abortions.
Belief. They cannot be prosecuted for performing an abortion but all
other medical standards apply.
Could you clarify what impact "other medical standards" have on
statement 11?
13. With the exception of China, no nation state forces a pregnant
woman to undergo an abortion.
Irrelevant. They do not where I live.
Again, I was simply listing facts prior to drawing any conclusions or
inferences. Until some inferences are made, how can anyone judge the
relevance of a statement?
14. Every abortion represents, barring accident or miscarriage, at
least one less person walking this earth.
Fact. So does every menstrual period.
Are you referring here to the loss during menstruation of a haploid
cell - the ovum, or a fertilised cell - the zygote?
Bryn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
31 Jan 2006 05:03:25 PM |
|
|
On 31 Jan 2006 12:55:46 -0800, in alt.abortion with
message-id <1138740946.653132.269850@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 05:56:47 -0800, wrote:
3. Every cell in a child's body contains the same DNA.
Normally fact.
Would you care to clarify that I might rephrase no 3 in a form that we
can agree on?
I know there are conditions under which DNA from different parts of
the body can differ. What causes this and what the conditions are I
have no idea. I could be wrong on this.
7. A fetus develops from a zygote which has a full set of paired
chromosomes.
Not an issue
8. A zygote is formed by the union of two haploid cells which each
possess a single set of unpaired chromosomes.
Not an issue.
I was listing facts prior to drawing any conclusions or inferences.
OK. I simply don't get involved at this level. It can be a kumquat
for all I care.
11. Medical staff performing the procedure to effect that interference
are protected against criminal prosecution for damage to the fetus or
the mother provided they comply with the law of the land regarding
abortions.
Belief. They cannot be prosecuted for performing an abortion but all
other medical standards apply.
Could you clarify what impact "other medical standards" have on
statement 11?
There are certain standards such as hygiene, using the proper
instruments, and so forth that are usually too mundane to be
considered, but with this issue it seems nothing is too mundane to be
attacked or involved. They would need to comply not just with
abortion procedures but any other laws on anything medical that may
become involved. Nothing should be assumed here.
13. With the exception of China, no nation state forces a pregnant
woman to undergo an abortion.
Irrelevant. They do not where I live.
Again, I was simply listing facts prior to drawing any conclusions or
inferences. Until some inferences are made, how can anyone judge the
relevance of a statement?
I am not familiar with every law in every country os I cannot comment
on them. I can only discuss the one I am familiar with.
There may be many small countries that have this as a policy. I
simply do not know.
14. Every abortion represents, barring accident or miscarriage, at
least one less person walking this earth.
Fact. So does every menstrual period.
Are you referring here to the loss during menstruation of a haploid
cell - the ovum, or a fertilised cell - the zygote?
Simply the fact that every time a woman for any reason fails to give
birth at every possible opportunity the result is one less person that
otherwise could possibly exist.
Bryn
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
04 Feb 2006 03:59:57 AM |
|
|
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On 31 Jan 2006 12:55:46 -0800, in alt.abortion with
message-id <1138740946.653132.269850@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Attila <prochoice@here.now> wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 05:56:47 -0800, wrote:
11. Medical staff performing the procedure to effect that interference
are protected against criminal prosecution for damage to the fetus or
the mother provided they comply with the law of the land regarding
abortions.
Belief. They cannot be prosecuted for performing an abortion but all
other medical standards apply.
Could you clarify what impact "other medical standards" have on
statement 11?
There are certain standards such as hygiene, using the proper
instruments, and so forth that are usually too mundane to be
considered, but with this issue it seems nothing is too mundane to be
attacked or involved. They would need to comply not just with
abortion procedures but any other laws on anything medical that may
become involved. Nothing should be assumed here.
How about this:
11. Medical staff performing the procedure to effect that interference
are protected against criminal prosecution for damage to the fetus or
the mother provided they comply with the law of the land regarding
abortions and with standard medical procedures.
14. Every abortion represents, barring accident or miscarriage, at
least one less person walking this earth.
Fact. So does every menstrual period.
Are you referring here to the loss during menstruation of a haploid
cell - the ovum, or a fertilised cell - the zygote?
Simply the fact that every time a woman for any reason fails to give
birth at every possible opportunity the result is one less person that
otherwise could possibly exist.
Would this be a fact that addresses your point?
15. In every menstruation, a woman loses an ovum along with the lining
of her womb, which represents a lost opportunity to bring to birth a
human being.
Bryn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
25 Jan 2006 05:24:54 AM |
|
|
Dutch wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
Dutch wrote:
I just wasted a couple days wrestling with a bunch of two-bit sophist
trolls
who inhabit this newsgroup. Now that I have most of them them tucked away
in
my killfile, are there any adults who are interested in having a serious,
adult discussion on some of the issues surrounding abortion?
I know exactly how you feel. This newsgroup is completely over-run by
some very childish people who have absolutely no respect for anyone
else and enjoy lying. I have tried relentlessly. I have lost all hope
that there is anyone in this newsgroup mature enough and capable of
handling a good discussion and still respecting differences.
I hope you have found that person in me. I promise not to screech "Liar" if
you disagree with me.
Great, it's refreshing. I think people do that because they have no
argument or they are not really serious in discussing the issue.
If you would like to discuss the issue, I would be more than happy to.
Great! I would classify myself as very reluctantly pro-choice. I am
absolutely of the belief that a fetus is a human being, I wish I didn't
think that way, but I can't help it.
Then we are on the same page. While I recognize that the law defines
person, I do believe and see the fetus as a human being. There is a
difference between person and human being.
It seems as plain as the sun in the
sky. Nonetheless I cannot bring myself to dictate to any woman how she can
or cannot deal with an unwanted pregnancy.
I agree. While I will always feel that abortion is morally wrong, it's
not my place or anyone elses place to tell a woman what she should do.
Now, if I am asked for my opinion I will state it.
I wish that people would stop
treating vaginal intercourse so casually so all these unwanted pregnancies
would stop, and I hope for every girl or woman who becomes "accidentally"
pregnant to realize what a mistake she has made, and face the fact that she
is carrying a human life inside her, not some undifferentiated tissue. If
she does so honestly and soberly and still would prefer to kill it than face
the prospect of a pregnancy then no court of law should stand in her way.
Most of all I wish "guys", and I don't call them "men", because they act
like dogs, would keep their dicks under control and quit pressuring girls
and women to have vaginal penetration. I know this seems like I am confused
and conflicted, I am, and in the middle, with parts of both "camps" but I
can't be any other way. I agree with some of what Roe v Wade judges have to
say, but a lot of it seems like fuzzy quasi-political language aimed at
placating as many people as possible. I have had some personal and indirect
involvement with this issue years ago, but who hasn't? Where do you stand?
Abortion, in my opinion, is an act out of desperation. It's normally
done out of convenience. A woman can freely choose to walk away from
parenthood by simply paying someone to kill her unborn child. She could
use any one of the following reasons to justify abortion. a) she is
not financially prepared, b) she doesn't want to be a mother, or c) she
has other plans in life and having a baby will only get in her way.
Now, a man could have the same reasons for not wanting to have to raise
and/or support a child. The only choice he has is to either pay or go
to jail. My personal opinion, a man will step up to the plate and want
to raise his child and be a father.
I think that abortion is used as a birth control method and that's just
plain out wrong. Our society has somehow gone morally bankrupt by
turning it's head and not valuing life.
While I will never stand in a womans way, nor try to force her one way
or another; I will never give aid to a woman to have an abortion. I
would give aid to help her find a way to keep her child, if asked to do
so.
Abortion is not murder; however it is homicide in my opinion. It's
morally wrong.
Instead of bashing women though for having abortions, I think we should
work together in helping to educate our younger generation to not be so
irresponsible and to value life. I believe in all forms of birth
control education, including abstinence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
25 Jan 2006 03:29:43 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-25 03:24:54 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> said:
Dutch wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
Dutch wrote:
I just wasted a couple days wrestling with a bunch of two-bit sophist
trolls
who inhabit this newsgroup. Now that I have most of them them tucked away
in
my killfile, are there any adults who are interested in having a serious,
adult discussion on some of the issues surrounding abortion?
I know exactly how you feel. This newsgroup is completely over-run by
some very childish people who have absolutely no respect for anyone
else and enjoy lying. I have tried relentlessly. I have lost all hope
that there is anyone in this newsgroup mature enough and capable of
handling a good discussion and still respecting differences.
I hope you have found that person in me. I promise not to screech "Liar" if
you disagree with me.
Great, it's refreshing. I think people do that because they have no
argument or they are not really serious in discussing the issue.
If you would like to discuss the issue, I would be more than happy to.
Great! I would classify myself as very reluctantly pro-choice. I am
absolutely of the belief that a fetus is a human being, I wish I didn't
think that way, but I can't help it.
Then we are on the same page. While I recognize that the law defines
person, I do believe and see the fetus as a human being. There is a
difference between person and human being.
It seems as plain as the sun in the
sky. Nonetheless I cannot bring myself to dictate to any woman how she can
or cannot deal with an unwanted pregnancy.
I agree. While I will always feel that abortion is morally wrong, it's
not my place or anyone elses place to tell a woman what she should do.
Now, if I am asked for my opinion I will state it.
I wish that people would stop
treating vaginal intercourse so casually so all these unwanted pregnancies
would stop, and I hope for every girl or woman who becomes "accidentally"
pregnant to realize what a mistake she has made, and face the fact that she
is carrying a human life inside her, not some undifferentiated tissue. If
she does so honestly and soberly and still would prefer to kill it than face
the prospect of a pregnancy then no court of law should stand in her way.
Most of all I wish "guys", and I don't call them "men", because they act
like dogs, would keep their dicks under control and quit pressuring girls
and women to have vaginal penetration. I know this seems like I am confused
and conflicted, I am, and in the middle, with parts of both "camps" but I
can't be any other way. I agree with some of what Roe v Wade judges have to
say, but a lot of it seems like fuzzy quasi-political language aimed at
placating as many people as possible. I have had some personal and indirect
involvement with this issue years ago, but who hasn't? Where do you stand?
Abortion, in my opinion, is an act out of desperation. It's normally
done out of convenience.
Your wife had an abotion.
A woman can freely choose to walk away from
parenthood by simply paying someone to kill her unborn child.
Like your wife did.
She could
use any one of the following reasons to justify abortion. a) she is
not financially prepared, b) she doesn't want to be a mother, or c) she
has other plans in life and having a baby will only get in her way.
Or any other reason - the choice is hers.
Now, a man could have the same reasons for not wanting to have to raise
and/or support a child. The only choice he has is to either pay or go
to jail.
You feel it is wrong that the man has no other choice so you want to
force women to have no other choice. This is all about revenge for you.
My personal opinion, a man will step up to the plate and want
to raise his child and be a father.
Instead of going to jail. Is that why you "stepped up to the plate?"
Fear of jail?
I think that abortion is used as a birth control method and that's just
plain out wrong.
The only experience you have of this is your wife. Is that how she used it?
Our society has somehow gone morally bankrupt by
turning it's head and not valuing life.
In Iraq.
While I will never stand in a womans way, nor try to force her one way
or another; I will never give aid to a woman to have an abortion. I
would give aid to help her find a way to keep her child, if asked to do
so.
So you have adopted?
Abortion is not murder; however it is homicide in my opinion.
In my opinion a guard is a waste of the taxpayer's money.
It's
morally wrong.
In your morally bankrupt opinion.
Instead of bashing women though for having abortions, I think we should
work together in helping to educate our younger generation to not be so
irresponsible and to value life.
Start in your own back yard.
I believe in all forms of birth
control education, including abstinence.
Just not for you ;=)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 02:25:16 AM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
25 Jan 2006 09:06:59 PM |
|
|
In article <2006012513294343658%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:
On 2006-01-25 03:24:54 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> said:
Dutch wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
Dutch wrote:
I just wasted a couple days wrestling with a bunch of two-bit sophist
trolls
who inhabit this newsgroup. Now that I have most of them them tucked away
in
my killfile, are there any adults who are interested in having a serious,
adult discussion on some of the issues surrounding abortion?
I know exactly how you feel. This newsgroup is completely over-run by
some very childish people who have absolutely no respect for anyone
else and enjoy lying. I have tried relentlessly. I have lost all hope
that there is anyone in this newsgroup mature enough and capable of
handling a good discussion and still respecting differences.
I hope you have found that person in me. I promise not to screech "Liar" if
you disagree with me.
Great, it's refreshing. I think people do that because they have no
argument or they are not really serious in discussing the issue.
If you would like to discuss the issue, I would be more than happy to.
Great! I would classify myself as very reluctantly pro-choice. I am
absolutely of the belief that a fetus is a human being, I wish I didn't
think that way, but I can't help it.
Then we are on the same page. While I recognize that the law defines
person, I do believe and see the fetus as a human being. There is a
difference between person and human being.
It seems as plain as the sun in the
sky. Nonetheless I cannot bring myself to dictate to any woman how she can
or cannot deal with an unwanted pregnancy.
I agree. While I will always feel that abortion is morally wrong, it's
not my place or anyone elses place to tell a woman what she should do.
Now, if I am asked for my opinion I will state it.
I wish that people would stop
treating vaginal intercourse so casually so all these unwanted pregnancies
would stop, and I hope for every girl or woman who becomes "accidentally"
pregnant to realize what a mistake she has made, and face the fact that she
is carrying a human life inside her, not some undifferentiated tissue. If
she does so honestly and soberly and still would prefer to kill it than
face
the prospect of a pregnancy then no court of law should stand in her way.
Most of all I wish "guys", and I don't call them "men", because they act
like dogs, would keep their dicks under control and quit pressuring girls
and women to have vaginal penetration. I know this seems like I am confused
and conflicted, I am, and in the middle, with parts of both "camps" but I
can't be any other way. I agree with some of what Roe v Wade judges have to
say, but a lot of it seems like fuzzy quasi-political language aimed at
placating as many people as possible. I have had some personal and indirect
involvement with this issue years ago, but who hasn't? Where do you stand?
Abortion, in my opinion, is an act out of desperation. It's normally
done out of convenience.
Your wife had an abotion.
A woman can freely choose to walk away from
parenthood by simply paying someone to kill her unborn child.
Like your wife did.
She could
use any one of the following reasons to justify abortion. a) she is
not financially prepared, b) she doesn't want to be a mother, or c) she
has other plans in life and having a baby will only get in her way.
Or any other reason - the choice is hers.
Now, a man could have the same reasons for not wanting to have to raise
and/or support a child. The only choice he has is to either pay or go
to jail.
You feel it is wrong that the man has no other choice so you want to
force women to have no other choice. This is all about revenge for you.
My personal opinion, a man will step up to the plate and want
to raise his child and be a father.
Instead of going to jail. Is that why you "stepped up to the plate?"
Fear of jail?
I think that abortion is used as a birth control method and that's just
plain out wrong.
The only experience you have of this is your wife. Is that how she used it?
Our society has somehow gone morally bankrupt by
turning it's head and not valuing life.
In Iraq.
While I will never stand in a womans way, nor try to force her one way
or another; I will never give aid to a woman to have an abortion. I
would give aid to help her find a way to keep her child, if asked to do
so.
So you have adopted?
Abortion is not murder; however it is homicide in my opinion.
In my opinion a guard is a waste of the taxpayer's money.
It's
morally wrong.
In your morally bankrupt opinion.
Instead of bashing women though for having abortions, I think we should
work together in helping to educate our younger generation to not be so
irresponsible and to value life.
Start in your own back yard.
I believe in all forms of birth
control education, including abstinence.
Just not for you ;=)
I'd say you have his number!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
25 Jan 2006 07:40:38 AM |
|
|
osprey lied:
I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 02:24:18 AM |
|
|
"Mimi Cohen" <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
25 Jan 2006 05:54:11 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
[...]
Abortion, in my opinion, is an act out of desperation. It's normally
done out of convenience. A woman can freely choose to walk away from
parenthood by simply paying someone to kill her unborn child.
Like your wife.
Abortion is not murder; however it is homicide in my opinion.
Your second wife is at least responsible for one homocide (that you
know of).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 02:23:41 AM |
|
|
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 08:18:54 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Peoria 3, Houston 0 (January 24)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, January 26 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 09:24:49 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 10:01:58 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
....for a very personal definition of "civilized debate".
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Peoria 3, Houston 0 (January 24)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, January 26 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 01:53:03 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
...for a very personal definition of "civilized debate".
I admit to losing my temper a little there, I didn't want the thread I
started to become just another vehicle for mudslinging.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 12:30:25 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
...for a very personal definition of "civilized debate".
I admit to losing my temper a little there, I didn't want the thread I
started to become just another vehicle for mudslinging.
I can accept that...but to be truthful, this newsgroup has been this way since
I first wandered in here, and that was in 1989.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 6, Houston 4 (January 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 27 at Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 02:54:43 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkirs5a5ha.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
...for a very personal definition of "civilized debate".
I admit to losing my temper a little there, I didn't want the thread I
started to become just another vehicle for mudslinging.
I can accept that...but to be truthful, this newsgroup has been this way
since
I first wandered in here, and that was in 1989.
Of course it is, I must have been delusional to think it would be anything
else.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 10:57:20 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkirs5a5ha.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
...for a very personal definition of "civilized debate".
I admit to losing my temper a little there, I didn't want the thread I
started to become just another vehicle for mudslinging.
I can accept that...but to be truthful, this newsgroup has been this way
since I first wandered in here, and that was in 1989.
Of course it is, I must have been delusional to think it would be anything
else.
Might as well get used to it, then, if you choose to hang around. That's the
nature of the beast.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Peoria 1 (January 27)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, January 28 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 10:56:16 PM |
|
|
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 11:14:53 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Peoria 3, Houston 0 (January 24)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, January 26 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 01:55:12 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few other
ranters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 12:32:15 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few other
ranters.
A ranter, Ray isn't. Be glad you didn't get some of the certifiables who
wandered through here in the early 1990s - David J. Rasmussen, Kevin Darcy,
and Suzanne Forgach, to name a few.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Iowa 6, Houston 4 (January 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 27 at Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dutch" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 02:59:50 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkek2ta5e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few other
ranters.
A ranter, Ray isn't.
Maybe you think that because he's on the same side of the issues as you, but
he shouted "Liar" and a number of other insults at me more times than I can
count in just two days, and I never lied once. It completely shuts down any
possibility of fruitful dialogue. If that's not ranting a discussion into
the ground what is?
Be glad you didn't get some of the certifiables who
wandered through here in the early 1990s - David J. Rasmussen, Kevin
Darcy,
and Suzanne Forgach, to name a few.
Let me take a wild guess, they were all pro-lifers, right? You don't scream
Liar when someone disagrees with you, do you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 11:03:37 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkek2ta5e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few other
ranters.
A ranter, Ray isn't.
Maybe you think that because he's on the same side of the issues as you,
Maybe I don't. Feel free to dig up any lies he may have stated, and take it
up with him. I don't speak for him any more than he does for me, but then
we're individuals who happen to agree on some issues, occasionally.
but he shouted "Liar" and a number of other insults at me more times than I
can count in just two days, and I never lied once. It completely shuts down
any possibility of fruitful dialogue. If that's not ranting a discussion into
the ground what is?
Stick around, and you'll see some flagrant examples. The trolls will always
be here, in one guise or another, and you can filter them out. There are no
censors to shield you from what you don't want to read - that's entirely your
responsibility. (It works.)
Be glad you didn't get some of the certifiables who wandered through here
in the early 1990s - David J. Rasmussen, Kevin Darcy, and Suzanne Forgach,
to name a few.
Let me take a wild guess, they were all pro-lifers, right? You don't scream
Liar when someone disagrees with you, do you?
No, but I tend to point it out when they're lying. That's just the way this
ridge-runner from a Kentucky coal camp was brought up.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Peoria 1 (January 27)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, January 28 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 05:00:35 PM |
|
|
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote in news:aRvCf.232979$tl.68372@pd7tw3no:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkek2ta5e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have
attempted to maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few
other ranters.
A ranter, Ray isn't.
Maybe you think that because he's on the same side of the issues as
you, but he shouted "Liar" and a number of other insults at me more
times than I can count in just two days, and I never lied once.
Substituting your words as if the other poster wrote them is lying and
forging, Crutch, and you have admittedly done that numerous times in
these ngs. Falsely claiming that you don't lie and forge just makes you
a multiple liar. Slimebag.
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
27 Jan 2006 03:13:45 PM |
|
|
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkek2ta5e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) writes:
Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
Are you suffering from dementia?
Obviously not. He's enjoying every minute of it.
Actually not at all, which is why I have killfiled Fischer and a few other
ranters.
A ranter, Ray isn't.
Maybe you think that because he's on the same side of the issues as you, but
he shouted "Liar" and a number of other insults at me more times than I can
count in just two days, and I never lied once.
LOL! The liar insisted, repeatedly, that a fetus is a human being,
despite numerous correction. The cretin started fabricating quotes.
It completely shuts down any
possibility of fruitful dialogue.
You don't do dialog, moron. You issue edicts and expect people to
accept them.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
28 Jan 2006 12:22:13 PM |
|
|
In article <5ogCf.228125$tl.49542@pd7tw3no>, "Dutch" <no@email.com>
wrote:
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
blatantly lying like that doesn't improve your image.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
26 Jan 2006 09:37:37 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:24:49 GMT, "Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote
"Dutch" <no@email.com> writes:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively or shut your yap.
Do as you say, not as you do.
Against a tide of verbal abuse and personal insults I have attempted to
maintain a civilized debate here.
No, you have not. You've gone out of your way to insult people that
haven't insulted you.
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Are there any legitimate people here? |
28 Jan 2006 02:02:07 PM |
|
|
Dutch wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote garbage
Contribute constructively
"Do as I say, not as I do."
or shut your yap.
So much for your proposal for constructive contributions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|