| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2006 08:53:10 PM |
| Object: |
Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
God help us all!
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/102006h.asp
....A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008. The political observer believes the former first lady has her sights
on another objective. With the midterm elections now out of the way, Joe
Glover of the Family Policy Network expects the attention to now turn to the
2008 presidential sweepstakes. Glover is convinced the junior senator from
New York really wants a seat on the Supreme Court, which makes decisions
that are not overturned when a president leaves office. He says when the
high court hands down "landmark" decisions, those decisions have
"longstanding impacts on generations" to come. The FPN president claims to
have seen some subtle evidence of Mrs. Clinton's plans. "You look at the
friends she's making," he notes: "[It's a] funny thing -- they're all on the
Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle." He sees that as a
clear indication of preparation for seeking a chair in the Supreme Court.
"She doesn't want to go to the White House," he adds. Glover says a Supreme
Court seat would allow Clinton to make decisions without having to fight
Congress -- and would protect her from the constant scrutiny of the media.
--
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
10 Nov 2006 09:08:37 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
God help us all!
Assuming he exists to begin with, he could help the rest of us by giving you
the honesty you badly need.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Iowa 1 (end of 2nd, November 10)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 15 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
10 Nov 2006 11:24:45 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
God help us all!
Assuming he exists to begin with, he could help the rest of us by giving you
the honesty you badly need.
Ha. That'd be a real miracle..
PDW
http://www.geocities.com/incognito_press
Second issue out!
See our website for details!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 01:54:21 AM |
|
|
"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
God help us all!
Assuming he exists to begin with, he could help the rest of us by giving you
the honesty you badly need.
Ha. That'd be a real miracle..
It would definitely shock readers of a few thousand newsgroups he's been doing
this in for years...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Iowa 1 (November 10)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 15 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 02:09:44 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator schrieb:
"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
God help us all!
Assuming he exists to begin with, he could help the rest of us by giving you
the honesty you badly need.
Ha. That'd be a real miracle..
It would definitely shock readers of a few thousand newsgroups he's been doing
this in for years...
Seriously, could you imagine sending every day for years the same
nonsense... What kind of life this J Young has!?! Is this his only
purpose: getting insulted by us?
I can understand playing this game for a few days, a few weeks even,
but years!?!
What a pathetic moron!
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Iowa 1 (November 10)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 15 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 02:31:03 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator schrieb:
"Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
God help us all!
Assuming he exists to begin with, he could help the rest of us by giving
you the honesty you badly need.
Ha. That'd be a real miracle..
It would definitely shock readers of a few thousand newsgroups he's been
doing this in for years...
Seriously, could you imagine sending every day for years the same
nonsense... What kind of life this J Young has!?! Is this his only
purpose: getting insulted by us?
Apparently, if Google's any indication.
I can understand playing this game for a few days, a few weeks even, but
years!?! What a pathetic moron!
Maybe he wants to be the closing mention on Paul Harvey's midday twenty
minutes...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Iowa 1 (November 10)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 15 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
10 Nov 2006 08:56:28 PM |
|
|
In article <2rmdnXK5-6EcpsjYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/102006h.asp
...A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008. The political observer believes the former first lady has her sights
on another objective. With the midterm elections now out of the way, Joe
Glover of the Family Policy Network expects the attention to now turn to the
2008 presidential sweepstakes. Glover is convinced the junior senator from
New York really wants a seat on the Supreme Court, which makes decisions
that are not overturned when a president leaves office. He says when the
high court hands down "landmark" decisions, those decisions have
"longstanding impacts on generations" to come. The FPN president claims to
have seen some subtle evidence of Mrs. Clinton's plans. "You look at the
friends she's making," he notes: "[It's a] funny thing -- they're all on the
Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle." He sees that as a
clear indication of preparation for seeking a chair in the Supreme Court.
"She doesn't want to go to the White House," he adds. Glover says a Supreme
Court seat would allow Clinton to make decisions without having to fight
Congress -- and would protect her from the constant scrutiny of the media.
Sounds good to me. Bill would be a great choice, too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 10:47:13 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <2rmdnXK5-6EcpsjYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/102006h.asp
...A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008. The political observer believes the former first lady has her sights
on another objective. With the midterm elections now out of the way, Joe
Glover of the Family Policy Network expects the attention to now turn to the
2008 presidential sweepstakes. Glover is convinced the junior senator from
New York really wants a seat on the Supreme Court, which makes decisions
that are not overturned when a president leaves office. He says when the
high court hands down "landmark" decisions, those decisions have
"longstanding impacts on generations" to come. The FPN president claims to
have seen some subtle evidence of Mrs. Clinton's plans. "You look at the
friends she's making," he notes: "[It's a] funny thing -- they're all on the
Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle." He sees that as a
clear indication of preparation for seeking a chair in the Supreme Court.
"She doesn't want to go to the White House," he adds. Glover says a Supreme
Court seat would allow Clinton to make decisions without having to fight
Congress -- and would protect her from the constant scrutiny of the media.
Sounds good to me. Bill would be a great choice, too.
Has he gotten his license back yet? I know his suspension for contempt
ended earlier this year, but I haven't heard much about it.
Can he serve on the SCOTUS if he is barred from arguing cases in their
court (which he is)?
Has any SCOTUS Justice ever had their license suspended prior to their
getting a seat?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 11:34:54 PM |
|
|
Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sounds good to me. Bill would be a great choice, too.
Has he gotten his license back yet? I know his suspension for contempt
ended earlier this year, but I haven't heard much about it.
Can he serve on the SCOTUS if he is barred from arguing cases in their
court
Anybody can be a supreme court justice. The only qualifications are
nomination by the president and confirmation by the senate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Juanjo" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
12 Nov 2006 10:55:53 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4556b27e$0$34488$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Vandar <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sounds good to me. Bill would be a great choice, too.
Has he gotten his license back yet? I know his suspension for contempt
ended earlier this year, but I haven't heard much about it.
Can he serve on the SCOTUS if he is barred from arguing cases in their
court
Anybody can be a supreme court justice. The only qualifications are
nomination by the president and confirmation by the senate.
True, look at Clarence Thomas
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 08:09:14 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:56:28 +0000, David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <2rmdnXK5-6EcpsjYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com>, J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/102006h.asp
...A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008. The political observer believes the former first lady has her sights
on another objective. With the midterm elections now out of the way, Joe
Glover of the Family Policy Network expects the attention to now turn to the
2008 presidential sweepstakes. Glover is convinced the junior senator from
New York really wants a seat on the Supreme Court, which makes decisions
that are not overturned when a president leaves office. He says when the
high court hands down "landmark" decisions, those decisions have
"longstanding impacts on generations" to come. The FPN president claims to
have seen some subtle evidence of Mrs. Clinton's plans. "You look at the
friends she's making," he notes: "[It's a] funny thing -- they're all on the
Judiciary Committee on the Republican side of the aisle." He sees that as a
clear indication of preparation for seeking a chair in the Supreme Court.
"She doesn't want to go to the White House," he adds. Glover says a Supreme
Court seat would allow Clinton to make decisions without having to fight
Congress -- and would protect her from the constant scrutiny of the media.
Sounds good to me. Bill would be a great choice, too.
I don't know how good he would be at it but the explosion of right winger
heads at the mere suggestion would be worth it...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"...otherwise, we're looking at the potential
of this kind of world:.... a world in which
oil reserves are controlled by radicals in order
to extract blackmail from the West..." [George Bush]
Wait... oil reserves?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 10:53:45 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
...A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008.
....
Glover says a Supreme
Court seat would allow Clinton to make decisions without having to fight
Congress -- and would protect her from the constant scrutiny of the media.
<LOL!> Is Glover one of those pesky illegals we keep hearing about? Too
bothered with making a living to realize that there's something known as
a Confirmation Hearing? Too illiterate to know that the Supreme Court
has it's every ruling analyzed and reported seven ways from Sunday the
moment the gavel falls?
Is he so out of the loop within his own organization to know that they
harp on the Supreme Court at the drop of a hat, and constantly wring
their hands -- in prayer mind -- over the "what if" question of another
Justice leaving while the shrub is still in office?
"HR... Paging HR... There's a blubbering idiot on the payroll..."
Um. Wait...
Nevermind.
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
"It is one thing to believe, as I do, that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. It is quite another to believe that committed same-sex relationships ... should not be recognized by society.
"We cannot prohibit or ban these relationships, and we shouldn't use our law to attempt to do so."
-- Denver, Colorado, Governor Roy Romer, 3/25/96
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Associate Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton (?) |
11 Nov 2006 08:52:05 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
God help us all!
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/11/102006h.asp
...A Virginia-based pro-family activist says he disagrees with the
traditional wisdom that Senator Hillary Clinton will seek the White House in
2008. The political observer believes...
I believe he's full of *****, and using religious whacko logic I must be
right simply because I believe it, all facts be damned.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
