Science > Abortion > Atheist might squirm on this - Mathematics Proves Christ's Resurrection?
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"osprey" |
| Date: |
29 Aug 2005 01:12:49 AM |
| Object: |
Atheist might squirm on this - Mathematics Proves Christ's Resurrection? |
It is faith, not proof, that makes Christians believe in Jesus Christ's
resurrection, the central tenet of the religion. Until now. Oxford
University professor Richard Swinburne, a leading philosopher of
religion, has seemingly done the impossible. Using logic and
mathematics, he has created a formula that he says shows a 97 percent
certainty that Jesus Christ was resurrected by God the Father, report
The Age and Catholic News.
This stunning conclusion was made based on a series of complex
calculations grounded in the following logic:
1. The probably of God's existence is one in two. That is, God either
exists or doesn't.
2. The probability that God became incarnate, that is embodied in human
form, is also one in two.
3. The evidence for God's existence is an argument for the
resurrection.
4. The chance of Christ's resurrection not being reported by the
gospels has a probability of one in 10.
5. Considering all these factors together, there is a one in 1,000
chance that the resurrection is not true
"New Testament scholars say the only evidences are witnesses in the
four gospels. That's only five percent of the evidence," Swinburne said
in a lecture he gave at the Australian Catholic University in
Melbourne. "We can't judge the question of the resurrection unless we
ask first whether there's reason to suppose there is a God. Secondly,
if we have reason to suppose he would become incarnate, and thirdly, if
he did, whether he would live the sort of life Jesus did." He says that
even Jesus' life is not enough proof. However, the resurrection is
"God's signature," which shows "his approval of Jesus' teaching." The
calculations that Swinburne says prove the resurrection are detailed in
his book, "The Resurrection of God Incarnate."
Has proof of part of the New Testament been found? Check out what
archaeologists discovered in a cave in Israel.
Archaeologists have found a cave where they believe John the Baptist
anointed many of his disciples, offering extraordinary proof of a
central New Testament figure and his theology.
The Associated Press reports that the cave is located on the Kibbutz
Tzuba, which is 2-1/2 miles from Ein Kerem, John the Baptist's hometown
that is now part of Jerusalem. The cave includes a huge cistern with 28
steps that lead to an underground pool of water. Some 250,000 pottery
shards were also found and are presumed to be remnants of small water
jugs used in the Christian baptismal ritual performed by the fiery New
Testament preacher. Wall carvings etched into the cave tell John's life
story; they were likely made by monks in the fourth or fifth century.
In addition, a stone was found in the cave that researchers believe was
used for ceremonial foot washing.
"John the Baptist, who was just a figure from the Gospels, now comes to
life," British archaeologist Shimon Gibson, who supervised the dig
outside Jerusalem, exclaimed to AP. He is the head of the private
Jerusalem Archaeological Field Unit and has written a book on the
subject titled "The Cave of John the Baptist." In a separate interview,
Gibson told Reuters, "Nothing like this has been found elsewhere. It is
the first time we have finds from the early baptismal period. It is an
amazing discovery that happens to an archeologist once in a lifetime."
But because there were no inscriptions found in the cave, some experts
insist there is no proof that John the Baptist ever set foot in it.
Instead, they think Byzantine-era monks commemorated John at this site
linked to him by local tradition. Gibson heartily disagrees, insisting
the carvings, foot washing stone, and other artifacts provide strong
circumstantial evidence that the cave was actually used by John and is
not just a memorial to him.
John the Baptist was a contemporary of Jesus Christ and was known as a
somewhat bizarre, long-haired character who preached a message of
redemption. Since he is considered one of the most important figures in
Christianity, the discovery--if it can be confirmed--would be among the
most significant breakthroughs for biblical scholars in memory, reports
AP.
Gibson thinks the cave appealed to John because it contained an
immersion pool. "It apparently was adopted by John the Baptist, who
wanted a place where he could bring people to undergo their rituals,
pertaining to his ideas of baptism," he told AP. The baptismal
candidates would have walked down the 28 stone steps, discarded their
clothes in a niche carved into the wall, and then placed their right
foot onto a stone that contained an imprint of a foot. A small
depression to the right of the imprint would have contained oil, to be
poured over the foot for cleansing.
Gibson thinks John the Baptist used the cave in the early years of his
ministry when he sought solitude in the wilderness. "In addition to
John the Baptist, there's a possibility that Jesus used this cave as
well," Gibson explained to Reuters.
.
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
08 Sep 2005 03:08:15 AM |
|
|
On 07 Sep 2005 23:01:44 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
louisemallard@journalist.com writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 6 Sep 2005 03:22:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
So Louise, do you think you will be coming to Delaware anytime soon? It
would be great to meet you in person and have dinner or something. My
treat of course.
It would be nice to meet a person like yourself who has a great sense
of humor and a sharp mind. I truely respect you and your opinions.
LOL!
Somebody here is playing a nasty joke on spud. (Thank you, whoever it
is.)
He's having a high old time, playing with himself.
So it seems, Patrick. I love it when osprey collapses online.
Spud's procedure seems to be: when caught lying, keep lying. Repeat as
necessary.
--and then call an apologetic truce when the consequences of his
*****'s to difficult to bear.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
09 Sep 2005 02:48:00 AM |
|
|
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 07 Sep 2005 23:01:44 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
louisemallard@journalist.com writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Louise Mallard <readmydigs@booknut.com> writes:
On 6 Sep 2005 03:22:46 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
So Louise, do you think you will be coming to Delaware anytime soon? It
would be great to meet you in person and have dinner or something. My
treat of course.
It would be nice to meet a person like yourself who has a great sense
of humor and a sharp mind. I truely respect you and your opinions.
LOL!
Somebody here is playing a nasty joke on spud. (Thank you, whoever it
is.)
He's having a high old time, playing with himself.
So it seems, Patrick. I love it when osprey collapses online.
Spud's procedure seems to be: when caught lying, keep lying. Repeat as
necessary.
--and then call an apologetic truce when the consequences of his
*****'s to difficult to bear.
Same old song in an apparent infinite loop...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 05:48:01 AM |
|
|
You are quite welcome!!!!! Isn't this fun?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
07 Sep 2005 01:21:44 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
You are quite welcome!!!!! Isn't this fun?
Of course! Raise your aim higher than your feet!
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 05:50:06 AM |
|
|
On 6 Sep 2005 03:48:01 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You are quite welcome!!!!! Isn't this fun?
Did Dwyer give you pointers?
<smile>
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 06:07:48 AM |
|
|
no.....but if you want information e-mail at
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 06:15:50 AM |
|
|
On 6 Sep 2005 04:07:48 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
no.....
<smirk>
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 06:21:06 AM |
|
|
Everyone please forgive me as I wasn't my normal self tonight. I was
having some kind of outta body experience. I promise to be myself
tonight like the true "osprey" I am!
Louise it was nice meeting you!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
07 Sep 2005 01:23:11 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Everyone please forgive me as I wasn't my normal self tonight. I was
having some kind of outta body experience. I promise to be myself
tonight like the true "osprey" I am!
Louise it was nice meeting you!
Spud, you'd better not try and register your multiple personalities. You only
get one vote, no matter how many people are living in your head.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 06:26:05 AM |
|
|
On 6 Sep 2005 04:21:06 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Path: border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.abortion,talk.abortion
Subject: Re: departing spud?
Date: 6 Sep 2005 04:21:06 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <1126005666.822477.47080@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <e49oh194a7u1d2pckubk5ehiv189ciaeaa@4ax.com>
<szku0gz8m34.fsf@eris.io.com>
<43cph194daurf0if2l10fc5hcmqs2p24qc@4ax.com>
<szkll2bnibj.fsf@eris.io.com>
<1blqh1dmfit44irb3nj6cpt4nc1p6t5jh6@4ax.com>
<1126002166.887235.317400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
<nnsqh1ddggi8r3t7rmcpvke7taiadd8v1b@4ax.com>
<1126003681.533896.250130@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<a0tqh1l2nia1u58vtcf4o5ok4c81vc782h@4ax.com>
<1126004868.603005.151750@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<kiuqh1honv2p9tdpq3bismmusnkv2ue7hk@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 167.21.1.225
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1126005671 20780 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2005 11:21:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <kiuqh1honv2p9tdpq3bismmusnkv2ue7hk@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=167.21.1.225;
posting-account=uc2VKwwAAAB71DC5b_mHt0cE57XxAPdB
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.abortion:843147 talk.abortion:937679
Everyone please forgive me as I wasn't my normal self tonight. I was
having some kind of outta body experience. I promise to be myself
tonight like the true "osprey" I am!
Louise it was nice meeting you!
<smirk>
Desperate osprey's trying to prove somebody to another USENET person
posting here. Pity, like Dwyer, shot himself in the feet.
Heh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 06:32:16 AM |
|
|
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
07 Sep 2005 01:24:04 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
Wait until you see what he's capable of online...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 07:21:35 AM |
|
|
On 6 Sep 2005 04:32:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
<smirk>
Rheish, there isn't any reason to pretend you're somebody else.
You've earned the reputation of being a liar, cheat, and thief and
everybody here already knows it.
Heh.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 08:30:13 AM |
|
|
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:5c2rh1hv637m3j66it6thkapq28kuvci81@4ax.com...
On 6 Sep 2005 04:32:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
<smirk>
Rheish, there isn't any reason to pretend you're somebody else.
You've earned the reputation of being a liar, cheat, and thief and
everybody here already knows it.
Heh.
Actually, that was not me. I have no idea who is doing that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
07 Sep 2005 01:34:23 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:5c2rh1hv637m3j66it6thkapq28kuvci81@4ax.com...
On 6 Sep 2005 04:32:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
<smirk>
Rheish, there isn't any reason to pretend you're somebody else.
You've earned the reputation of being a liar, cheat, and thief and
everybody here already knows it.
Heh.
Actually, that was not me. I have no idea who is doing that.
Good one, Uncle Spud! Got any more fantasies?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: departing spud? |
06 Sep 2005 02:18:51 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:30:13 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Louise Mallard" <readmydigs@booknut.com> wrote in message
news:5c2rh1hv637m3j66it6thkapq28kuvci81@4ax.com...
On 6 Sep 2005 04:32:16 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise this is somebody else.....we work with Bob so we (or should I
say I) decided to play a joke on Bob. We are just having a little fun
with Bob...it gets a little wound up to tight at times but overall is a
very good person.
<smirk>
Rheish, there isn't any reason to pretend you're somebody else.
You've earned the reputation of being a liar, cheat, and thief and
everybody here already knows it.
Heh.
Actually, that was not me. I have no idea who is doing that.
Tell somebody who doesn't know you're a pathelogical liar.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 06:34:15 PM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 16:26:47 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 15:51:05 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 15:13:12 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 14:57:27 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
LC wrote:
<snip>
<clip>
If you got something to say to me,
http://www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/spud.php
Butt ugly.
Oh well, life goes on.
Patrick got smart..there is nothing there.
Click on it--you'll see that it is, SPUD. ;-)
(Apparently you didn't bother to read the link clearly.)
No,
Of course not. Have you visited the the above link, yet?
<chuckles>
what I am doing is sending all post that are about that topic
I am going to forever mock you about the atrocious image in that
photo, and there is absolutely *****-all you can do about it.
Knock yourself out. If that is what you feel you must do, then do what
you think you must do.
So, have you visited the link? 'Cause I'll ask Patrick and he'll tell
me if you have or haven't.
to
the photographer and to my lawyer, William Hudson in Dover.
Oooooo--I'm tremblin' in my boots.
I am not interested; however, if they report back to me anything that
opens up a law suit, I intend to go forward with it.
Be my guest.
Patrick is not that stupid.
None of us will shut up about your filth, osprey.
What ever knocks your socks off. Personally I am tired of wasting time
with you and your loon's.
LOONS dumby--as in plural.
Yes, I will most likely be moving on to
another newsgroup...
Bon Voyage!
<Snipped irrelevance>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 08:55:27 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 06:47:08 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was
looking for... "Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no
evidence as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the
person who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
Your own tail, as usual.
Just because I posted it doesn't mean I support or believe it. So tell
me what it is that I supposably bit?
Riiiight, Spud. Thanks for confirming you've taken another kick to the
head.
I posted it for one reason and only one reason, and the reason was in
the title.
You're either lying, or still too stupid to understand basic Usenet
conventions, Spud...which is why I still recommend you avoid the URL I
put up with your ugly mug featured.
Personally, I don't care what you think about me. However, you are
posting a picture without permission. The photographer and my attorney
may take some interest in this. I would advise you get smart, quickly.
You haven't even looked at it yet.
That's right, I don't have any intention to visit any of your sites.
You should have learned that last time you tried to lure me to your
worthless website.
Paranoia becomes you, Spud.
However, I have your post and I have a line to my attorney and to the
photographer, with your admission to posting it.
If you are stupid enough, I don't mind taking your money.
You might want to take a look at it before you start whining again. Where
does it say anything about whose picture is featured?
End of subject, it's going to the photographers hands and my attorneys
now. If you did post it and you removed it...good boy..you got smart.
Have fun...because nothing's going to happen.
I have just been advised to not say any more on this issue with you...
Stop threatening people, you moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 09:14:03 AM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:47:08 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was
looking for... "Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no
evidence as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the
person who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
Your own tail, as usual.
Just because I posted it doesn't mean I support or believe it. So tell
me what it is that I supposably bit?
Riiiight, Spud. Thanks for confirming you've taken another kick to the
head.
I posted it for one reason and only one reason, and the reason was in
the title.
You're either lying, or still too stupid to understand basic Usenet
conventions, Spud...which is why I still recommend you avoid the URL I
put up with your ugly mug featured.
Personally, I don't care what you think about me. However, you are
posting a picture without permission. The photographer and my attorney
may take some interest in this. I would advise you get smart, quickly.
You haven't even looked at it yet.
That's right, I don't have any intention to visit any of your sites.
You should have learned that last time you tried to lure me to your
worthless website.
Paranoia becomes you, Spud.
However, I have your post and I have a line to my attorney and to the
photographer, with your admission to posting it.
If you are stupid enough, I don't mind taking your money.
You might want to take a look at it before you start whining again. Where
does it say anything about whose picture is featured?
End of subject, it's going to the photographers hands and my attorneys
now. If you did post it and you removed it...good boy..you got smart.
Have fun...because nothing's going to happen.
I have just been advised to not say any more on this issue with you...
Stop threatening people, you moron.
I don't threaten dunderhead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 09:37:54 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 07:14:03 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 06:47:08 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was
looking for... "Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no
evidence as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the
person who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
Your own tail, as usual.
Just because I posted it doesn't mean I support or believe it. So tell
me what it is that I supposably bit?
Riiiight, Spud. Thanks for confirming you've taken another kick to the
head.
I posted it for one reason and only one reason, and the reason was in
the title.
You're either lying, or still too stupid to understand basic Usenet
conventions, Spud...which is why I still recommend you avoid the URL I
put up with your ugly mug featured.
Personally, I don't care what you think about me. However, you are
posting a picture without permission. The photographer and my attorney
may take some interest in this. I would advise you get smart, quickly.
You haven't even looked at it yet.
That's right, I don't have any intention to visit any of your sites.
You should have learned that last time you tried to lure me to your
worthless website.
Paranoia becomes you, Spud.
However, I have your post and I have a line to my attorney and to the
photographer, with your admission to posting it.
If you are stupid enough, I don't mind taking your money.
You might want to take a look at it before you start whining again. Where
does it say anything about whose picture is featured?
End of subject, it's going to the photographers hands and my attorneys
now. If you did post it and you removed it...good boy..you got smart.
Have fun...because nothing's going to happen.
I have just been advised to not say any more on this issue with you...
Stop threatening people, you moron.
I don't threaten dunderhead.
You don't threaten "dunderhead"...?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 12:12:10 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Just because I posted it doesn't mean I support or believe it.
Smirk. Run away, Katie.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist might squirm on this - So far eight (8) in less than 12 hours |
30 Aug 2005 12:18:54 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
Just because I posted it doesn't mean I support or believe it.
Smirk. Run away, Katie.
Well, that ended your little charade. Looks like you ran out of lies.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 12:32:42 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 01:10:06 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm". I
never said it was any threat, and I never said I agreed with it.
You were wrong...again...no news at 11
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 08:32:46 AM |
|
|
On 29 Aug 2005 23:10:06 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm". I
never said it was any threat, and I never said I agreed with it.
You were wrong...again...no news at 11
You're posting your lies, again--and this time, from work. Say
something really inflammatory.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Somewriter once again not knowing what she is talking about |
30 Aug 2005 08:36:22 AM |
|
|
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 23:10:06 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm". I
never said it was any threat, and I never said I agreed with it.
You were wrong...again...no news at 11
You're posting your lies, again--and this time, from work. Say
something really inflammatory.
Like what? You see, one of the reasons you lunatics have not gotten
what you wanted is because when I post, I post from an area that is not
within my work confines...something you were not aware of and something
you don't know anything about. There are areas, such as break rooms,
library's, and so forth from where we can post.
Keep crying.
Now, if you will excuse me a certain person in this newsgroup has
gotten my attorney's attention and a photographer's.
Might pay off..:o)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Louise Mallard" |
|
| Title: Re: Somewriter once again not knowing what she is talking about |
30 Aug 2005 08:39:40 AM |
|
|
On 30 Aug 2005 06:36:22 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Louise Mallard wrote:
On 29 Aug 2005 23:10:06 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm". I
never said it was any threat, and I never said I agreed with it.
You were wrong...again...no news at 11
You're posting your lies, again--and this time, from work. Say
something really inflammatory.
Like what?
Poor *****.
He's having another one of his noxious meltdowns.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 12:48:56 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm".
Because you believed it.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 01:14:53 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm".
Because you believed it.
Your proof?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Heishman might squirm on this |
30 Aug 2005 09:08:44 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Attila wrote:
And I even put it in the headers as a clue as to what I was looking
for...
"Atheist might squirm on this"
Man, you guys will jump at anything.
Even things that sound utterly off the wall.
Sounding utterly off the wall is business as usual for religious
fanatics. If they will accept the concept of a god with no evidence
as all they will accept anything.
And that is probably a statement FAR MORE off the wall than the person
who did that research.
There was no "research". It's all religious propaganda with no basis
in fact or mathematics.
And you were stupid enough to bite.
Bite what?
The propaganda you posted, moron.
Moron, who said I "bit" it?
You posted it, *****. You pretended like it would be some threat to
atheists, cretin.
No moron, I posted it because I knew a few atheist would "squirm".
Because you believed it.
Your proof?
Your belief that atheists would be bothered by it.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
