Science > Abortion > Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason)
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
24 Dec 2005 04:57:21 PM |
| Object: |
Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB113538491760731012.html
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2160 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 03:53:41 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:45 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
Or was you "point" that you have no proof to support your lies?
I think his point was that he wanted to type "Q.E.D." and this looked
like as good a place as any.
The point is that the two of you are apparently either unable to read
for comprehension, or there's the possibility that you're actually
leftists trying to make right-wingers look ignorant.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 02:27:11 PM |
|
|
¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
Or was you "point" that you have no proof to support your lies?
I think
You lie, you've never had an independent thought in your life because
you don't have the number of functioning brain cells to accomplish it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 02:25:58 PM |
|
|
Moron Davis wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
Or was you "point" that you have no proof to support your lies?
Just out of curiosity are you calling Raven a "point" or are you too
illiterate to understand (twice isn't a typo) to use the correct word
for someone else possessive "youR"? you fucking moron go back to 2nd
grade and learn to read and write properly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 02:30:15 PM |
|
|
"Mimi Cohen" <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hfDrf.951$ZA5.799@fed1read05...
Moron Davis wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
Or was you "point" that you have no proof to support your lies?
Just out of curiosity are you calling Raven a "point" or are you too
illiterate to understand (twice isn't a typo) to use the correct word
for someone else possessive "youR"? you fucking moron go back to 2nd
grade and learn to read and write properly.
Insults are all youR kind ever have
<plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 03:50:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:11:15 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
LOL! Do you know what "hoist by your own petard" means? I thought not.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 03:53:47 PM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:2u4uq1l8ff9nudvjsarecfo44tmpn4tmoh@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:11:15 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that
Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false,
however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
LOL! Do you know what "hoist by your own petard" means? I thought not.
<plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 07:33:39 PM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:11:15 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:kqetq19l5jud7kiuvk2mnsmlnc3la9angm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however,
it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
You "point" being that you're a FUCKTARD?
LOL! Do you know what "hoist by your own petard" means? I thought not.
Moron Davis surely lives up er down to his name.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 09:48:05 AM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 10:06:11 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 10:22:06 AM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you? Maybe
you should stay off your Christmas computer until you learn how to use
it. LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 03:53:46 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all. I mentioned that Republicans keep resorting to the "So's
your old man" form of argument, and you demonstrated my point right
away by immediately attacking Bill Clinton. Is that hole deep enough
for you yet, or are you going to keep digging?
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 04:28:07 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 06:21:41 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:07 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
Apparently you have a problem with honesty as well as reading
comprehension. Here's what you snipped:
"I mentioned that Republicans keep resorting to the "So's
your old man" form of argument, and you demonstrated my point right
away by immediately attacking Bill Clinton. Is that hole deep enough
for you yet, or are you going to keep digging?"
I'm seriously beginning to think you really *are* a leftist trying to
make the right-wing look bad.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 07:33:01 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:07 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
Apparently you have a problem with
getting through to you. I suspect you have brain damage of some kind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 02:13:34 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:33:01 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:07 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
Apparently you have a problem with
getting through to you. I suspect you have brain damage of some kind.
Again, I strongly suspect you're a leftist trying to make the right
look like dishonest idiots.
<plonk>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 07:03:46 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:33:01 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:07 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
Apparently you have a problem with
getting through to you. I suspect you have brain damage of some kind.
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect. You're all a bunch of paranoid whackos
anyway.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 07:56:50 PM |
|
|
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond. you apepar to care a lot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 08:00:08 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com>
wrote:
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond.
Clearly false. I'm just bored. Reply, and I'll spank you again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
28 Dec 2005 07:30:47 AM |
|
|
In article <fcs3r1tdppca6tsoir2q22o54hpidfpp35@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com>
wrote:
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond.
Clearly false.
denial of the obvious is a sign that not all things are well, child.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 09:36:07 PM |
|
|
¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com>
wrote:
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond.
Clearly false. I'm just bored. Reply, and I'll spank you again.
*YOU* spank him? You lying, moronic *****, you've been being spanked
from the moment you fell into this newsgroup, you're just too stupid to
know it.
you spanked him HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
HAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAhaHAha
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 10:06:27 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:56:50 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond. you apepar to care a lot.
And he's apparently too stupid to understand what "<plonk>" means.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
27 Dec 2005 10:39:43 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:56:50 -0500, "james g. keegan jr."
<jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <a2p3r1l1s1t76oq2vn1ult4592svi8g9mn@4ax.com>,
"¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Again, I strongly suspect
no one cares what you suspect.
clearly false. you cared enough to respond. you apepar to care a lot.
And he's apparently too stupid to understand what "<plonk>" means.
I know you're still reading, you loon. You can't help yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 07:37:07 PM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:07 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all.
LOL Yeah, apparently you are.
Apparently you have a problem with honesty as well as reading
Honest RRRwingnut would be the *ULTIMATE* oxymoron.
comprehension. Here's what you snipped:
"I mentioned that Republicans keep resorting to the "So's
your old man" form of argument, and you demonstrated my point right
away by immediately attacking Bill Clinton. Is that hole deep enough
for you yet, or are you going to keep digging?"
I'm seriously beginning to think you really *are* a leftist trying to
make the right-wing look bad.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
26 Dec 2005 07:35:42 PM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:22:06 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:48:05 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:06:35 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:grasq15kd56c08864et66a0a2e4pj24eqb@4ax.com...
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
The "argument" that George Walker Bush was EVER AWOL is false, however, it
is TRUE that William Jefferson Clinton is a draft dodger.
Q.E.D.
So far that's two people jumping in to prove my point, any other
takers...?
Was your point that Clinton went out of his way to avoid military
service in Vietnam, and therefore must be as much of a coward as
liberals claim G.W. Bush is?
You're welcome!
You need to re-read for comprehension.
Also, I don't recall ever mentioning being a fan of Bill Clinton. Did
you have a reason for bringing him up, other than to prove my point?
You're having a bit of trouble following the thread, aren't you?
Not at all. I mentioned that Republicans keep resorting to the "So's
your old man" form of argument, and you demonstrated my point right
away by immediately attacking Bill Clinton. Is that hole deep enough
for you yet, or are you going to keep digging?
He'll keep digging it because he's too much of a moron to even know he's
digging. You're absolutely correct about the "so's yer ole man" excuse.
That and "he did it first" is their whole "argument". It must suck to be
them.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
24 Dec 2005 11:33:08 PM |
|
|
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
So you're saying that Bill Clinton's avoidance of Vietnam was
indefensible? Interesting! Thanks!
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
24 Dec 2005 11:44:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:33:08 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
So you're saying that Bill Clinton's avoidance of Vietnam was
indefensible? Interesting! Thanks!
Q.E.D.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 10:19:17 AM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:33:08 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
So you're saying that Bill Clinton's avoidance of Vietnam was
indefensible? Interesting! Thanks!
Q.E.D.
He's not smart or literate enough to get the reference.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 10:18:31 AM |
|
|
¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
So you're saying that Bill Clinton's avoidance of Vietnam was
indefensible? Interesting! Thanks!
and yet again you prove your inability to read for comprehension and
mistake or intentionally mislead readers of your pitiful excuses of
posts by lying about what Raven said. So which is it are you too
ignorant to understand what Raven really said or are you so dishonest as
to try and change what was really written into something NOT said or
even implied?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
25 Dec 2005 10:15:43 AM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:44:59 -0800, "¿mÿ§t뮦@n?" <?@?.com> wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
This is, of course, the "so's your old man" argument that Republicans
inevitably resort to when faced with defending the indefensible...
No, it's worse than that; this moron cut part of Yang's sig and
pretended that it's a quote from former President Clinton when in fact
it's a quote from doofus "duke" Catholic accused child molester. This
loser you replied to admitted he wasn't pretending and by implication (a
word he won't know its definition) he admitted to being a craven
dishonest forger and all round loser.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barrons: Impeach the ***** (GOP: The Party of Treason) |
24 Dec 2005 10:03:16 PM |
|
|
¿mÿ§t뮦@n? wrote:
In talk.politics.guns "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
- Bill Clinton
Thank you for publicly demonstrating your basic dishonesty. Only
dishonest craven liars change other people's posts and pretend they
didn't. Apparently you're too stupid to realize that about 99% of usenet
has read and knows Yang's sig and because of that we all know that the
quote is actually that of "duke" the child molesting RRRwingnut draft
dodger so of course because you're as morally, ethically and
intellectually as bankrupt as he is you'd stick up for and try to cover
for him.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Barrons: Time to Consider Impeachment (GOP, The Party of Treason)
New Time Article Shows that GOP is the Party of Treason
RoveGate Update (GOP, the Party of Treason)
GOP, The Party of Excuses, Incompetenece, and Treason
Gee, I Wonder Why Blacks Won't Vote Republicans? (GOP, The Party of treason)
GOP Lies fo the Day: The Entire Bush Speech (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Brian Williams reports: Power ON for Bush's speach, DARKNESS 1 hour later (GOP, The Party of Treason)
GAO, Bush Broke Law By Diseminating Propaganda in the US (GOP, The Party of Treason)
| Cheney Claimed Iraq Was Providing WMD Training To Al-Qaeda Months After Source Recanted (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Fox News Pegs Bush at 36% (GOP, The Party of Treason)
2 More Countries Leave the Coalition of the Decieved (GOP, The Party of Treason)
Oops, Rightwing Professor Caught Lying About Military Service, Forced to Resign (GOP, The Party of Treason)
FOX News Blame Jews For "War on Christmas" (GOP, The Party of Treason and Anti-Semitism
GOP to Waste HALF A TRILLION on Iraq (GOP, The Party of Treason)
FISA Judges: Bush's Illegal Acticity Undermines War on Terror (GOP, The Party of Treason)
|
|
|
