In article <1202nt9726j4l4e@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-F72FE4.19400425022006@individual.net...

In article <1201s6gv133ade@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-6B4FF3.20570924022006@individual.net...

In article <11vve6fqpgt64d6@news.supernews.com>,
"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote

"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:

"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote

"Dutch" <no@email.com> wrote:

Next, they will outlaw contraception, as a 1/2 slaying.

The Catholic church already calls it a mortal sin.

All part of their plot to instigate Gestation Slavery.

Ah yes, the "enslave women" conspiracy theory.. an overused
strawman.

that's the company line from the mispogynist side, anyway.

That is "pro-choice goon" strawman used to divert attention from
the
real
issues

that is the anti-choice, misogynist statement from a creep who
thinks
women are no better than breeding stock.

Another "pro-choice goon" strawman used to divert attention from
the
real
issues.

another anti-choice, misogynist statement from a creep who thinks
women are no better than breeding stock.

Another "pro-choice goon" strawman used to divert attention

another anti-choice, misogynist statement from a creep who thinks
women are no better than breeding stock.

Another "pro-choice goon" strawman used to divert attention from the
issue.

another anti-choice, misogynist statement from a creep who thinks
women are no better than breeding stock.

My diety? lol... you already got me judged as someone else!

Look, in my opinion, there is only 1 God.

There might be many religions that
are there to try and decipher God, or if you prefer: our Creator.

But that fact is that all religions have a common trend, and that is to
create law and order.

And yes, I know that mankind has a habbit of having
different interpretations.

I am roman catholic by the way, and so I have no so called 'diety'. This
means, I believe in God and Jesus Christ. Ok?

thanks for coming out!

My diety? lol... you already got me judged as someone else!

Look, in my opinion, there is only 1 God.

There might be many religions that
are there to try and decipher God, or if you prefer: our Creator.

But that fact is that all religions have a common trend, and that is to
create law and order.

And yes, I know that mankind has a habbit of having
different interpretations.

I am roman catholic by the way,

and so I have no so called 'diety'.

This
means, I believe in God and Jesus Christ. Ok? thanks for coming out!

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1140138554.216553.79070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Daniel wrote:

Moses was not perfect remember. God actually punished him due to the
complaints of God's people, and Moses was only ordered by God to lead the
people to the promise land. Not kill people. And so, God told Moses
that
he himself could not enter the land and would stay up in the moutains
overlooking it instead.

And why should I care what your deity says? Which deity of the
hundreds of thousands available to choose from are you referring to?

Where in my statement did you decipher a lie?

Where you say that the commandment is correctly translated as "Thou
shall not kill." And the implied lie that I should care about what
your religion says, one that you are still making.

You point the finger at me
and judge me a lier? And..... who are you again?

Mark Sebree. Having trouble reading? I signed my name to my post.

Where in the commandent "thou shalt not kill" does it say "thou shalt not
kill..... 10 people max."... "thou shalt not kill.... 20 people max".

It does not say "Thou shall not kill". It is obviously a poor
translation. Especially when taken in context of all the death
penalties in their laws and genocidal wars that were engaged in.

What I meant by the content of my opinion was that killing is wrong no
matter how big or little someone may kill.

Then you must hate the Bible, since people are killed in it at the
command of your hypocritical imaginary deity all the time.

However, in the case of abortion, nobody is killed. What's more, women
are not slaves, and you cannot force them to act as incubators and life
support for something if they do not willingly consent to it, and
continue giving their consents.

By the way, top posting is considered to be bad form and poor
netiquette.

Mark Sebree

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1140104152.452424.70760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Daniel wrote:

Not to start a big debate, but whether you kill 1 person or 2... "Thou
shalt
not kill" does not have any specific number of people you are allowed
or
not
allowed to kill. It means: no killing and that's final

First, why should anyone else be forced to accept or follow your
beliefs since we have Freedom of Religion in this country?

Second, your interpretation is easy to prove a lie, or at least not in
line with what the Bible says. Dueteronomy and Leviticus contain many
things that warrent the death penalty. And Joshua, Moses's chosen
successor, immediately went to war and started attacking the
surrounding cities and tribes and wiping them out.

Therefore, given that it was the same people that wrote the Ten
Commandments that also wrote the laws for the Hebrews, and the next
generation after than that went to war, it is unlikely that the
commandment that you are referring to actually means what you think it
means.

Mark Sebree

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Oq6dnW0Uf5HQj2neRVn-qA@giganews.com...

The Georgia legislature should take matters one step further;
killing
only
the pre-born child at any stage should also constitute homicide.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/0214metlegabortion.html

Bill makes killing a pregnant woman at any stage a double slaying

A woman uses a test at home and finds that she is pregnant. Later in
the
day, she is shot to death. Has one person been killed - or two?
That question is one Georgia lawmakers are likely to debate soon.

Bills in the House and headed for the Senate would change Georgia's
feticide
laws to allow for the prosecution of anyone who causes the death of
an
unborn child, regardless of the stage of pregnancy.

"I consider a fetus to be a person, and you're killing two people,"
said
Sen. Renee Unterman (R-Buford), who plans to push a Senate bill
aimed
at
changing the state's feticide laws. "So you should be punished for
killing
two people."

My diety? lol... you already got me judged as someone else!

Look, in my opinion, there is only 1 God. There might be many religions that
are there to try and decipher God, or if you prefer: our Creator.

But that fact is that all religions have a common trend, and that is to
create law and order. And yes, I know that mankind has a habbit of having
different interpretations.

I am roman catholic by the way, and so I have no so called 'diety'. This

means, I believe in God and Jesus Christ. Ok? thanks for coming out!

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1140138554.216553.79070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Daniel wrote:

Moses was not perfect remember. God actually punished him due to the
complaints of God's people, and Moses was only ordered by God to lead the
people to the promise land. Not kill people. And so, God told Moses
that
he himself could not enter the land and would stay up in the moutains
overlooking it instead.

And why should I care what your deity says? Which deity of the
hundreds of thousands available to choose from are you referring to?

Where in my statement did you decipher a lie?

Where you say that the commandment is correctly translated as "Thou
shall not kill." And the implied lie that I should care about what
your religion says, one that you are still making.

You point the finger at me
and judge me a lier? And..... who are you again?

Mark Sebree. Having trouble reading? I signed my name to my post.

Where in the commandent "thou shalt not kill" does it say "thou shalt not
kill..... 10 people max."... "thou shalt not kill.... 20 people max".

It does not say "Thou shall not kill". It is obviously a poor
translation. Especially when taken in context of all the death
penalties in their laws and genocidal wars that were engaged in.

What I meant by the content of my opinion was that killing is wrong no
matter how big or little someone may kill.

Then you must hate the Bible, since people are killed in it at the
command of your hypocritical imaginary deity all the time.

However, in the case of abortion, nobody is killed. What's more, women
are not slaves, and you cannot force them to act as incubators and life
support for something if they do not willingly consent to it, and
continue giving their consents.

By the way, top posting is considered to be bad form and poor
netiquette.

Mark Sebree

"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1140104152.452424.70760@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Daniel wrote:

Not to start a big debate, but whether you kill 1 person or 2... "Thou
shalt
not kill" does not have any specific number of people you are allowed
or
not
allowed to kill. It means: no killing and that's final

First, why should anyone else be forced to accept or follow your
beliefs since we have Freedom of Religion in this country?

Second, your interpretation is easy to prove a lie, or at least not in
line with what the Bible says. Dueteronomy and Leviticus contain many
things that warrent the death penalty. And Joshua, Moses's chosen
successor, immediately went to war and started attacking the
surrounding cities and tribes and wiping them out.

Therefore, given that it was the same people that wrote the Ten
Commandments that also wrote the laws for the Hebrews, and the next
generation after than that went to war, it is unlikely that the
commandment that you are referring to actually means what you think it
means.

Mark Sebree

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Oq6dnW0Uf5HQj2neRVn-qA@giganews.com...

The Georgia legislature should take matters one step further;
killing
only
the pre-born child at any stage should also constitute homicide.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/0214metlegabortion.html

Bill makes killing a pregnant woman at any stage a double slaying

A woman uses a test at home and finds that she is pregnant. Later in
the
day, she is shot to death. Has one person been killed - or two?
That question is one Georgia lawmakers are likely to debate soon.

Bills in the House and headed for the Senate would change Georgia's
feticide
laws to allow for the prosecution of anyone who causes the death of
an
unborn child, regardless of the stage of pregnancy.

"I consider a fetus to be a person, and you're killing two people,"
said
Sen. Renee Unterman (R-Buford), who plans to push a Senate bill
aimed
at
changing the state's feticide laws. "So you should be punished for
killing
two people."