David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <HMOdnQd4xYh-Y_DcRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:131020042117315721%spam@aol.com...

In article <W-KdnTh5keceZvDcRVn-iA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:131020042102160851%spam@aol.com...

In article <416DF82E.7030709@hotmail.com>, Tempest
<tempest@hotmail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <v6-dnW68-s_AbPDcRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"DemsRock" <DemsRock@Someplace.com> wrote in message
news:K_-dnejWVsi8bfDcRVn-rw@comcast.com...

"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1097723240.KsBVPmgB7OC1O2ZS0dmvpg@bubbanews...

In the first debate, Kerry's harsh prosecutorial manner was
effective. In
the second, it was boring. In the third, it's backfiring.

Kerry comes off as an arch-pessimist, reciting a litany of woes
that
could
depress anyone. Meanwhile, Bush is cheerfully celebrating the fact
that a
19-year-old girl was the first democratic voter in the history of
Afghanistan.

Americans like optimists. This election is over. Bush wins.

Not according to any poll, I've seen! ;-)

Take a look at the Electorial maps...Bush is winning.

Hate sells.

The electorial maps wildly fluctuate.

Just two days ago they had Kerry winning 302 votes.

They're about as accurate as throwing a dart at a wall.

I agree, but this needs to be remembered. If Bush wins, it will be
because he lied about Kerry and convinced the less sophisticated and
less educated to be afraid. Think about it! Bush was a coward during
Vietnam and has convinced many the HE is the hero and Kerry the coward.
Bush claims to be strong on terrorism, but he convinces the American
public they should be afraid.

Kerry stands tall and says We Will Not Be Afraid and will deal with
terrorists.

Naa, he just says we will make them a nuisance instead of defeating them.

That is what the REPUBLICANS said years ago, moron. It is a perfect
example of an out of context statement and lies that Bush tells. And
think the piece of ***** is a good president.

This is for anyone who doesn't know Barnes or is following Barnes (Elmo)
postings
Take note: Everytime someone is able to show where a Democrat or a Liberal
said something Barnes doesn't like...or show where Barnes said something
that makes him look foolish (which is about 98% of the time) he always
falls
back on the excuse that it was taken out of context.

Osprey doesn't understand what "out of context" means. Here is what
Kerry ACTUALLY said:

"We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the
focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance. As a former
law-enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution.
We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce
it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't
threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something
that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your
life."

Osprey is just a liar. <YAWN> But you all know that...

Also, Kerry wasn't the first person to speak of this. Brent Scowcroft,
the national security adviser in the FIRST BUSH ADMINISTRATION, said
the United States can break the back of terrorism "so that it is a
horrible nuisance, and not a paralyzing influence."

I love making Osprey look like a fool. :-)

You talk as if it's some difficult feat. ;-)

In our last episode, David Barnes began showing a mental breakdown with his
obsession over Osprey..
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:131020042133303296%spam@aol.com...

In article <HMOdnQd4xYh-Y_DcRVn-jw@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:131020042117315721%spam@aol.com...

In article <W-KdnTh5keceZvDcRVn-iA@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:131020042102160851%spam@aol.com...

In article <416DF82E.7030709@hotmail.com>, Tempest
<tempest@hotmail.com> wrote:

David W. Barnes wrote:

In article <v6-dnW68-s_AbPDcRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

"DemsRock" <DemsRock@Someplace.com> wrote in message
news:K_-dnejWVsi8bfDcRVn-rw@comcast.com...

"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1097723240.KsBVPmgB7OC1O2ZS0dmvpg@bubbanews...

In the first debate, Kerry's harsh prosecutorial manner was
effective. In
the second, it was boring. In the third, it's backfiring.

Kerry comes off as an arch-pessimist, reciting a litany of woes
that
could
depress anyone. Meanwhile, Bush is cheerfully celebrating the
fact
that a
19-year-old girl was the first democratic voter in the history
of
Afghanistan.

Americans like optimists. This election is over. Bush wins.

Not according to any poll, I've seen! ;-)

Take a look at the Electorial maps...Bush is winning.

Hate sells.

The electorial maps wildly fluctuate.

Just two days ago they had Kerry winning 302 votes.

They're about as accurate as throwing a dart at a wall.

I agree, but this needs to be remembered. If Bush wins, it will be
because he lied about Kerry and convinced the less sophisticated and
less educated to be afraid. Think about it! Bush was a coward
during
Vietnam and has convinced many the HE is the hero and Kerry the
coward.
Bush claims to be strong on terrorism, but he convinces the American
public they should be afraid.

Kerry stands tall and says We Will Not Be Afraid and will deal with
terrorists.

Naa, he just says we will make them a nuisance instead of defeating
them.

That is what the REPUBLICANS said years ago, moron. It is a perfect
example of an out of context statement and lies that Bush tells. And
think the piece of ***** is a good president.

This is for anyone who doesn't know Barnes or is following Barnes (Elmo)
postings
Take note: Everytime someone is able to show where a Democrat or a
Liberal
said something Barnes doesn't like...or show where Barnes said something
that makes him look foolish (which is about 98% of the time) he always
falls
back on the excuse that it was taken out of context.

Osprey doesn't understand what "out of context" means. Here is what
Kerry ACTUALLY said:

"We have to get back to the place we were,

And back then Terrorist were not defeated. You lost in the very first
sentence Barnes.

where terrorists are not the

focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance.

Damn...and what did I say earlier???? Barnes is really this stupid

As a former

law-enforcement person, I know we're never going to end prostitution.
We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce
it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't
threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something
that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your
life."

Osprey is just a liar. <YAWN> But you all know that...

Yet I said he just says we will make them a nuisance instead of defeating
them
and you supported it..ROFL

Also, Kerry wasn't the first person to speak of this. Brent Scowcroft,
the national security adviser in the FIRST BUSH ADMINISTRATION, said
the United States can break the back of terrorism "so that it is a
horrible nuisance, and not a paralyzing influence."

I love making Osprey look like a fool. :-)

When are you going to start?

Watch the next episode of Barne's breakdown

And he lies about his wanting Tort reform, when he voted against it.

Black and white thinking from the simple minded Republican.

Use your own source to check on his lies, mistruths,
distortions...factcheck.org

Good idea! Lets see:

The ad by the pro-Bush group Progress for America Voter Fund claims the
economy was already in a recession when Bush took office, but the
National Bureau of Economic Research (which dates business cycles)
says the recession actually began in March 2001, after Bush took office
in January.

Fact Check: It's not quite true, as the ad claims, that Bush inherited
"an economy already in recession." It would have been accurate to say
Bush inherited "an economy on the verge of recession."

The National Bureau of Economic Research, a non-partisan group of
mostly academic economists, set the start date of the recession as
March 2001, weeks after Bush took office on Jan 20.

How many times have you lied about that?

Now, why don't you show what they say about Kerry...or are you going to
"choose" to be a blind liberal?

Why don't you admit to lying about this?

I didn't lie

Why don't you admit that the source shows where Kerry has told mistruths,
distortions, misleading statements and so forth?

Good boy...is that what your Democrats say to you when you behave like a
good little democrat?

Stop with the whining...

Bush says that is weak. It is strong to be afraid, weak

to stand tall. Amazing. And people buy it.

The problem is clear to me. Like Osprey,

Damn, I really got to you. You are on this little rampage again where
you
are going to refer to me in every single one of your post again.

Stop whining.

and I only pick on him

because

You have no life
You can't win on a debate
You can't defeat me
You are obsessed.

The list goes on.

LOL! In your little mind.