| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2006 08:13:24 PM |
| Object: |
Bush is a failure |
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 06:26:01 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd9884$0$58073$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a
failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most
of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than
the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had
already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an
alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore
could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you
want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the
fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and
delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot
you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron.
Hmmm. Five years of gross incompetance compared with no experience as
president in one case and four years as vice president in another.
A log would have done a better job than Bush.
He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore.
Because you're stupid.
No, actually because I don't like the UN running the show for us.
ROFL! Black Helicopters! UN control!
Not to
mention I don't like the idea of appealing to terrorists.
Sure you do. That's why you support Bush.
At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us.
Like they feared the Nazis.
Not really,
Yes, really.
but from your response I am guessing that you want America to be
attacked again.
Ooooo! The paranoid coward trots out the terrorist bogeyman!
Booo!
Here's a clue: Bush is responsible for about as many American deaths
as is al Qaeda.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 08:15:02 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43deae99$0$58056$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd9884$0$58073$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned
Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are
more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections
who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a
failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this?
Most
of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than
the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had
already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an
alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore
could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you
want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change
the
fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing
otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and
delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot
you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no
wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush
was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative
was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to
look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron.
Hmmm. Five years of gross incompetance compared with no experience as
president in one case and four years as vice president in another.
A log would have done a better job than Bush.
He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore.
Because you're stupid.
No, actually because I don't like the UN running the show for us.
ROFL! Black Helicopters! UN control!
You're obviously as idiotic as I've always thought.
Not to
mention I don't like the idea of appealing to terrorists.
Sure you do. That's why you support Bush.
Liberals are the ones with a history of appeasing those who seek to destroy
us. They give up America inch by inch.
At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us.
Like they feared the Nazis.
Not really,
Yes, really.
Not in the real world.
but from your response I am guessing that you want America to be
attacked again.
Ooooo! The paranoid coward trots out the terrorist bogeyman!
Booo!
Here's a clue: Bush is responsible for about as many American deaths
as is al Qaeda.
Obviously in your world the twin towers were never attacked. This is why the
mentality of liberals will never make it. In your world, no one is out to
get us. In your world, everyone of every different belief can be friends.
Sadly, that isn't the real world. In the real world America has enemies that
will not back down until we are crunched by the totalitarian regime of
Islam.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 11:08:53 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Because you're stupid.
No, actually because I don't like the UN running the show for us.
ROFL! Black Helicopters! UN control!
You're obviously as idiotic as I've always thought.
Paranoid schizophrenics are incapable of realizing that they're wrong.
Not to
mention I don't like the idea of appealing to terrorists.
Sure you do. That's why you support Bush.
Liberals are the ones with a history of appeasing those who seek to destroy
us.
The usual political bigotry. Right now it is the neocons who are
creating terrorism. It is people like you who promote killing.
but from your response I am guessing that you want America to be
attacked again.
Ooooo! The paranoid coward trots out the terrorist bogeyman!
Booo!
Here's a clue: Bush is responsible for about as many American deaths
as is al Qaeda.
Obviously in your world the twin towers were never attacked.
I accounted for them, moron. 2900 people died. That's just about as
many Americans as has died in Bush's wars. And in addition to that,
another 120,000 innocent Iraqis have died. And while the 9/11 attack
cost the US several biliion dollars, Bush's wars has cost the US
several HUNDRED BILLION dollars.
This is why the
mentality of liberals will never make it.
You dumbshit bigots never seem to know what's really going on the
world. All you can understand is "us good them bad". A mindless
binary worldview.
In your world, no one is out to
get us.
All you understand is killing. Anybody you don't like needs to be
killed. "Terrorists", "liberals", "Muslims", whatever. And you
justify it with appalling ignorance.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
31 Jan 2006 06:02:58 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43def0e5$0$58109$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Because you're stupid.
No, actually because I don't like the UN running the show for us.
ROFL! Black Helicopters! UN control!
You're obviously as idiotic as I've always thought.
Paranoid schizophrenics are incapable of realizing that they're wrong.
Don't they have medication to help you with this problem?
Not to
mention I don't like the idea of appealing to terrorists.
Sure you do. That's why you support Bush.
Liberals are the ones with a history of appeasing those who seek to
destroy
us.
The usual political bigotry. Right now it is the neocons who are
creating terrorism. It is people like you who promote killing.
I happen to like the killing of terrorists. Obviously you support them.
but from your response I am guessing that you want America to be
attacked again.
Ooooo! The paranoid coward trots out the terrorist bogeyman!
Booo!
Here's a clue: Bush is responsible for about as many American deaths
as is al Qaeda.
Obviously in your world the twin towers were never attacked.
I accounted for them, moron.
Really? So are you admitting that the terrorist threat is a wee bit more
than a boogie man?
2900 people died. That's just about as
many Americans as has died in Bush's wars. And in addition to that,
another 120,000 innocent Iraqis have died. And while the 9/11 attack
cost the US several biliion dollars, Bush's wars has cost the US
several HUNDRED BILLION dollars.
As fot the war in Iraq, I don't support it so trying to bring that against
me is like using cheese to fight mice.
This is why the
mentality of liberals will never make it.
You dumbshit bigots never seem to know what's really going on the
world. All you can understand is "us good them bad". A mindless
binary worldview.
At least there is a bad in our world. We don't consider our enemies to be
friends. In your world everyone loves one another.
In your world, no one is out to
get us.
All you understand is killing. Anybody you don't like needs to be
killed. "Terrorists", "liberals", "Muslims", whatever. And you
justify it with appalling ignorance.
It's either killed or be killed. Are you going to allow yourself to be the
first in line to die? If not, shut up hypocrite.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
31 Jan 2006 11:00:29 AM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Because you're stupid.
No, actually because I don't like the UN running the show for us.
ROFL! Black Helicopters! UN control!
You're obviously as idiotic as I've always thought.
Paranoid schizophrenics are incapable of realizing that they're wrong.
Don't they have medication to help you with this problem?
You're the one worrying about the UN taking over the US.
Not to
mention I don't like the idea of appealing to terrorists.
Sure you do. That's why you support Bush.
Liberals are the ones with a history of appeasing those who seek to
destroy
us.
The usual political bigotry. Right now it is the neocons who are
creating terrorism. It is people like you who promote killing.
I happen to like the killing of terrorists.
So there isn't any difference between you and a terrorist. You both
like killing people.
but from your response I am guessing that you want America to be
attacked again.
Ooooo! The paranoid coward trots out the terrorist bogeyman!
Booo!
Here's a clue: Bush is responsible for about as many American deaths
as is al Qaeda.
Obviously in your world the twin towers were never attacked.
I accounted for them, moron.
Really? So are you admitting that the terrorist threat is a wee bit more
than a boogie man?
I'm more worried about some idiot driving while talking on a cell
phone than about your sily bogeyman.
2900 people died. That's just about as
many Americans as has died in Bush's wars. And in addition to that,
another 120,000 innocent Iraqis have died. And while the 9/11 attack
cost the US several biliion dollars, Bush's wars has cost the US
several HUNDRED BILLION dollars.
As fot the war in Iraq, I don't support it so trying to bring that against
me is like using cheese to fight mice.
You support Bush, you support the war.
This is why the
mentality of liberals will never make it.
You dumbshit bigots never seem to know what's really going on the
world. All you can understand is "us good them bad". A mindless
binary worldview.
At least there is a bad in our world.
Anybody you don't like.
It's the mentality of the terrorist. Kill people you don't like.
In your world, no one is out to
get us.
All you understand is killing. Anybody you don't like needs to be
killed. "Terrorists", "liberals", "Muslims", whatever. And you
justify it with appalling ignorance.
It's either killed or be killed.
He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 11:09:12 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:43dd9884$0$58073$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" < > wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned
Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned
Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
message news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are
more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections
who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a
failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/i
ndex.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this?
Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better
than the alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had
already served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an
alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore
could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus
together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what
you want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change
the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing
otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and
delusions and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses
or something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged
parrot you sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no
wonder you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush
was better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative
was first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to
look back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron.
Hmmm. Five years of gross incompetance compared with no experience as
president in one case and four years as vice president in another.
A log would have done a better job than Bush.
He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore.
Because you're stupid.
At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us.
Like they feared the Nazis.
Or like fearing a xtian fanatic with his finger on the nuclear trigger.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 11:25:34 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron. He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore.
Never mind his groos incompetance.
At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us.
What you haven't been smart enough to figure out yet is that you also
now have a reason to fear the US government. From illegal spying on
you to throwing people in prison without trial to raiding the treasury
in order to benefit political patrons, your government is not on your
side. Bush is not your friend and not your ally.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 06:06:38 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 06:43:20 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dab58e$0$58112$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush. He is still better than the alternative
though. You don't seem to be able to comprehend that. You are as much an
idiot as George.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:54:17 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dab58e$0$58112$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:48:15 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dacec9$0$58115$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dab58e$0$58112$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
You seem to keep missing the memo Ray, thus proving yourself too stupid to
have a conversation with. Go back to china communist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 12:13:54 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
You seem to keep missing the memo Ray, thus proving yourself too stupid to
have a conversation with. Go back to china communist.
Smirk. "Declare victory and retreat".
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 01:01:07 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dbb462$0$58084$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
You seem to keep missing the memo Ray, thus proving yourself too stupid to
have a conversation with. Go back to china communist.
Smirk. "Declare victory and retreat".
There is never a need to declare a victory when there is no war. You keep
calling him the leader of "my cult" but I've never supported Bush. I've just
supported him more than the alternative. You have never produced evidence to
prove otherwise. You are nothing but a troll, not to mention dishonest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 01:11:21 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dbb462$0$58084$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
You seem to keep missing the memo Ray, thus proving yourself too stupid to
have a conversation with. Go back to china communist.
Smirk. "Declare victory and retreat".
There is never a need to declare a victory when there is no war.
That's one approach: If yo're liosing then declare that there was
never any battle.
You keep
calling him the leader of "my cult" but I've never supported Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
I've just
supported him more than the alternative.
LOL!
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:40:09 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dbc1d9$0$58105$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dbb462$0$58084$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
In other words, you're such an irrational cultist that you'll
support
your cult's leader even as he screws you over.
Note to Ray...I don't support Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
He is still better than the alternative
though.
Because he's the leader of your cult? Because he's screwup up
everything he's touched? Because he's a liar? Because he's trying
to circumvent the Constitution and make himself dictator?
You seem to keep missing the memo Ray, thus proving yourself too stupid
to
have a conversation with. Go back to china communist.
Smirk. "Declare victory and retreat".
There is never a need to declare a victory when there is no war.
That's one approach: If yo're liosing then declare that there was
never any battle.
Learn to type troll
You keep
calling him the leader of "my cult" but I've never supported Bush.
"Still better than the alternative"
I've just
supported him more than the alternative.
Opting for the lesser of two evils is not support.
LOL!
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Nice Ray, mutilate my post and then declare victory. Typical of someone who
has no facts to back his case.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 04:43:03 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
Ouch!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:47:27 PM |
|
|
In article <1138401783.305154.167540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
Ouch!!!
Good one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:33:11 PM |
|
|
osprey lied:
Ouch
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 08:55:09 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:43:14 AM |
|
|
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever. Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 07:40:17 PM |
|
|
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever.
lying is a sin, child.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
you've been reading those magazines hidden under your momma's bed
again, haven't you child?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 08:49:03 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-4F428D.20401729012006@individual.net...
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my *****
now
or ever.
lying is a sin, child.
Then why do you do it so much? That sounds like an awefully religious term
you are using for someone who seems to hate religion is all it's forms,
especially Christianity.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
you've been reading those magazines hidden under your momma's bed
again, haven't you child?
Unlike you, I dont still live with my mama. I'm sure she hopes even more
than I do that you grow up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 04:06:56 PM |
|
|
In article <Z8fDf.299$c64.199@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-4F428D.20401729012006@individual.net...
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my *****
now
or ever.
lying is a sin, child.
Then why do you do it so much?
that you are projecting speaks ill of you.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
you've been reading those magazines hidden under your momma's bed
again, haven't you child?
Unlike you, I dont still live with my mama.
lying is a sin child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 04:22:34 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-932703.17065630012006@individual.net...
In article <Z8fDf.299$c64.199@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-4F428D.20401729012006@individual.net...
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked,
by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my
*****
now
or ever.
lying is a sin, child.
Then why do you do it so much?
that you are projecting speaks ill of you.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
you've been reading those magazines hidden under your momma's bed
again, haven't you child?
Unlike you, I dont still live with my mama.
lying is a sin child.
Sounds like awefully religious terms you are using for someone who hates
religion so much. However, if you do indeed beleive it is a sin, why do you
lie so much?
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
31 Jan 2006 04:38:05 PM |
|
|
In article <MkwDf.362$c64.301@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-932703.17065630012006@individual.net...
In article <Z8fDf.299$c64.199@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-4F428D.20401729012006@individual.net...
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked,
by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my
*****
now
or ever.
lying is a sin, child.
Then why do you do it so much?
that you are projecting speaks ill of you.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
you've been reading those magazines hidden under your momma's bed
again, haven't you child?
Unlike you, I dont still live with my mama.
lying is a sin child.
Sounds like awefully religious terms you are using for someone who hates
religion so much.
are you now claiming to hate religion?
or were you lying again by suggesting that i do?
However, if you do indeed beleive it is a sin, why do you
lie so much?
i see you are lying again.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 10:06:02 AM |
|
|
In article <G2HCf.77$c64.49@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up. David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever. Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
Bragging about kicking your ***** would be like bragging that I kicked
the ***** of the 10 year old kid down the street.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 01:16:55 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up.
I won't do YOU the favour. ;-)
David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever.
Okay--he hurt your feelings.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
No--but I suggest David better watch his; osprey and you seem desperate
to ride it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:36:39 PM |
|
|
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138475815.060550.240720@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up.
I won't do YOU the favour. ;-)
You'd be doing yourself a favor. You only continue to make yourself look
like a dumbass by not doing it.
David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever.
Okay--he hurt your feelings.
Nope
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
No--but I suggest David better watch his; osprey and you seem desperate
to ride it.
Good comeback...say almost the exact same thing back to me...next time get
some help with that gaia. You might actually sound intelligent if you do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia Barclay" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 04:09:00 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138475815.060550.240720@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked, by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up.
I won't do YOU the favour. ;-)
You'd be doing yourself a favor.
I won't do YOU the favour--since it is YOU who is demanding I "shut the
***** up."
You only continue to make yourself look
like a dumbass by not doing it.
By all means continue to make yourself look like a dumbass, everytime
you allow the obvious to defy you. ;-) (Please read above, for that
indication.)
David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever.
Okay--he hurt your feelings.
Nope
Yup.
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
No--but I suggest David better watch his; osprey and you seem desperate
to ride it.
Good comeback...
No--just an observation I felt like sharing.
say almost the exact same thing back to me...next time get
some help with that gaia. You might actually sound intelligent if you do.
What?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 04:45:42 PM |
|
|
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138486140.917238.268910@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138475815.060550.240720@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"Gaia Barclay" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1138416909.940430.92190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
Reasoned Insanity wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
Ouch!!!
That scream came from "Reasoned Insanity" whose ***** was just kicked,
by
David Barnes.
Gaia..do yourself a favor and shut the ***** up.
I won't do YOU the favour. ;-)
You'd be doing yourself a favor.
I won't do YOU the favour--since it is YOU who is demanding I "shut the
***** up."
I'm only telling you to do so for your own good. If you want to make
yourself look like more of an idiot, continue talking.....
You only continue to make yourself look
like a dumbass by not doing it.
By all means continue to make yourself look like a dumbass, everytime
you allow the obvious to defy you. ;-) (Please read above, for that
indication.)
David didn't kick my ***** now
or ever.
Okay--he hurt your feelings.
Nope
Yup.
So you can feel my feelings now huh?
Maybe you should check your own ***** though...he seems to be riding
it very closely.
No--but I suggest David better watch his; osprey and you seem desperate
to ride it.
Good comeback...
No--just an observation I felt like sharing.
Right...Idiot.
say almost the exact same thing back to me...next time get
some help with that gaia. You might actually sound intelligent if you do.
What?
I would enlighten you, but you still wouldn't get it. You don't have the
intelligence to get it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kashmir" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 05:24:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:13:24 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
That Jesus is on GHWB's side...
It's the frigging moral majority, man.
--
Kashmir
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
