| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2006 08:13:24 PM |
| Object: |
Bush is a failure |
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
.
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 04:30:32 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:47:26 PM |
|
|
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative though.
What alternative is that?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:49:10 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747276632%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
What alternative is that?
Gore and then later Kerry...Duh. Idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 10:06:02 AM |
|
|
In article <A5HCf.80$c64.43@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747276632%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
What alternative is that?
Gore and then later Kerry...Duh. Idiot.
And you feel lies, infringements on civil liberties, failing economies,
bribes to government officials, government sanctioned torture, and
pre-textual wars are preferable to what (that Gore and Kerry would have
implemented)?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 11:20:10 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806019673%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <A5HCf.80$c64.43@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747276632%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
What alternative is that?
Gore and then later Kerry...Duh. Idiot.
And you feel lies, infringements on civil liberties, failing economies,
bribes to government officials, government sanctioned torture, and
pre-textual wars are preferable to what (that Gore and Kerry would have
implemented)?
Absolutely, and to be quite honest the only reason the economy looks bad is
because of this unneeded war in Iraq. The economy is growing at a faster
pace than it ever has. The only problem is that Bush is still spending it
faster. One thing that is often not mentioned is that the Clinton economy
was rolling down hill for the last 6 months before Bush took office.
To address government torture, there is nothing wrong with it as long as it
is being used only for the reason of extracting information from foriegn
alliences. They are not under our constitution and have no rights under our
laws. Not to mention, their leaders wouldn't think twice about doing it to
us.
As for civil liberties, the only right I've seen of mine that has been
infringed on is my right to privacy regarding the illegal wiretaps. I
haven't made any out of country calls in the last 10 years though and I've
never made calls to any terrorists so I don't suspect that my calls were
interesting enough for them to tap me.
The bribes to government officials ***** me off, but we seem to get them no
matter who we have in office. That's what lobbist's exist to do. They bribe
officials. It's been that way for years.
To answer your question though, I believe that we would be in a hell of a
lot worse shape were Kerry or Gore elected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 12:15:35 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806019673%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <A5HCf.80$c64.43@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747276632%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
What alternative is that?
Gore and then later Kerry...Duh. Idiot.
And you feel lies, infringements on civil liberties, failing economies,
bribes to government officials, government sanctioned torture, and
pre-textual wars are preferable to what (that Gore and Kerry would have
implemented)?
Absolutely,
Cultist.
and to be quite honest the only reason the economy looks bad is
because of this unneeded war in Iraq.
The unneeded war that's Bush's doing.
The economy is growing at a faster
pace than it ever has.
The economy has finally been able to adapt to Bush's screwups.
The only problem is that Bush is still spending it
faster. One thing that is often not mentioned is that the Clinton economy
was rolling down hill for the last 6 months before Bush took office.
Except that that's just Bush administration revisionism.
To address government torture, there is nothing wrong with it
And there is the appalling lack of morality that is typical of the
right wing idiot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 01:12:15 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dbb4c7$0$58084$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806019673%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <A5HCf.80$c64.43@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747276632%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <PcxCf.17$c64.12@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
What alternative is that?
Gore and then later Kerry...Duh. Idiot.
And you feel lies, infringements on civil liberties, failing economies,
bribes to government officials, government sanctioned torture, and
pre-textual wars are preferable to what (that Gore and Kerry would have
implemented)?
Absolutely,
Cultist.
Just because someone has a view that is different than yours does not mean
they are a cultist Ray. This is probably one of the many things that you
will never understand given your hate for those that are different than you.
and to be quite honest the only reason the economy looks bad is
because of this unneeded war in Iraq.
The unneeded war that's Bush's doing.
No ***** Sherlock. Didn't I just say that?
The economy is growing at a faster
pace than it ever has.
The economy has finally been able to adapt to Bush's screwups.
If you truly believe that the economy is not growing because of what Bush
has done with it you are more of a moron than I first realized. In your
little world Bush probably doesn't even take a ***** correctly. That looks a
lot like the cultism that you so actively accuse others of being followers
of.
The only problem is that Bush is still spending it
faster. One thing that is often not mentioned is that the Clinton economy
was rolling down hill for the last 6 months before Bush took office.
Except that that's just Bush administration revisionism.
The biggest revisionist I know of is you Ray. I guess Bush changed all the
history books too didn't he?
To address government torture, there is nothing wrong with it
And there is the appalling lack of morality that is typical of the
right wing idiot.
Several months ago there was a case of a soldier firing his gun in the air
to intimidate a captured terrorist. As a result several lives were saved.
War is not moral and there are no rules. To save fellow patriots lives you
sometimes have to play by the same rules the terrorists play by. I guess you
would have been happier had more American died. It would have given you more
to ***** about in your troll like antics.
Nothing wrong with being right wing...the key word here is "Right". You
obviously don't belong to the left wing, but judging from all your comments
you must belong to the "wrong" wing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 04:57:04 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative though.
Clinton was the alternative. Everything went well with him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:47:27 PM |
|
|
In article <2006012714570450073%ggains@waddfredu>, George
<ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote:
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative though.
Clinton was the alternative. Everything went well with him.
And will again.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 04:59:08 PM |
|
|
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 05:13:55 PM |
|
|
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're an
idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
27 Jan 2006 07:47:28 PM |
|
|
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 03:45:59 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 10:06:02 AM |
|
|
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 11:08:25 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes. Thanks for confirming my suspicions
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 05:43:05 PM |
|
|
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative. You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
28 Jan 2006 08:46:41 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact that
it's true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 02:49:20 PM |
|
|
In article <B2WCf.181$c64.74@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact that
it's true.
If it were true.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 04:12:10 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:290120061249202897%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <B2WCf.181$c64.74@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
If it were true.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I'm not
going to be the one to call it a walrus. It is true dispite your irrational
denials.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
31 Jan 2006 10:47:19 AM |
|
|
In article <w4bDf.266$c64.49@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:290120061249202897%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <B2WCf.181$c64.74@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
If it were true.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I'm not
going to be the one to call it a walrus.
If
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 01:01:43 AM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 01:38:51 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you sound.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 06:42:33 AM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 08:42:19 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was first
Gore and then Kerry. You are no one to speak concerning being rational. You
are one of the most irrational of the lefties here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 12:45:13 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise. It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that. All you have is your cherishhed
prejudices. YOu're just an ignorant cultist looking for
justification.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 01:34:53 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on. If he sucks in the senate, I'm sure as hell not going to make him
my president if I can do anything to stop it. We had to deal with Gore as
vice president so I we learned quite a bit about him there. As I said before
(as you so kindly deleted), you are the irrational one here. It's just been
proven once again. I am completely justified in believing what I do about
them. Unlike you, I don't exonerate them just because they are democrats.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 01:42:39 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 04:11:59 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an
alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you
want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the
fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron. He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore. At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us. Guys like Kerry and Gore seem to like it up the
***** and would practically invite the takeover of America by foreign powers.
By continuing to defend your ridiculousness, you are only serving to make
yourself look dumber.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
29 Jan 2006 10:39:32 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dc6857$0$58070$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120061543052491%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <ZANCf.102$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120060806029726%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <G2HCf.78$c64.46@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:270120061747286718%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <yOxCf.19$c64.16@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"George" <ggains@waddfr.edu> wrote in message
news:200601271459088930%ggains@waddfredu...
On 2006-01-27 14:30:32 -0800, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com>
said:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:260120061813245465%dbarnes@aol.com...
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more
likely
to
vote
for
a candidate in November's congressional elections who
opposes
President
Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure
so
far,
according to a poll released Thursday.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html
What I can't figure out is what the other 42% are
thinking.
You think we need a new station to tell us this? Most of
us
already
knew
that Bush, like you, is a failure. Still better than the
alternative
though.
The last part of your name seems accurate.
Maybe accurate for you, but not for me. Clinton had already
served
two
terms
therefore could not serve another. He was not an
alternative.
You're
an
idiot.
The other Clinton perhaps?
The other Clinton has never ran for president therefore could
not
have
been
an alternative. You and George ride the short bus together
didn't
you?
You are lost.
I take that as a yes.
Of course you do. You Right Wing assholes always see what you
want
to
see.
Even if I did see things the way I wanted, it wouldn't change the
fact
that
it's true.
Of course it's not true, and you have no way of knowing otherwise.
It's
your opinion and an opinion based upon the prejudices and delusions
and ignorance of a right-wing ideologue.
Do you hire a left wing speech writer to do all your responses or
something?
The more I read what you post, the more like a left winged parrot you
sound.
If that's the best response you can come up with then it's no wonder
you think Bush is better than anybody.
You're just an irrational cultist.
Excuse me dumbass...yes I'm talking to you Ray. I never said Bush was
better
than anybody. He was better than the alternative. The alternative was
first
Gore and then Kerry.
You have no way of knowing that.
Sure I do. I have a 20 some odd year of senate history for Kerry to look
back on.
And we have 5 years of appalling incompetance to compare with.
Doesn't change the fact that you are a irrational moron.
Hmmm. Five years of gross incompetance compared with no experience as
president in one case and four years as vice president in another.
A log would have done a better job than Bush.
He still gets my
vote over Kerry or Gore.
Because you're stupid.
At least with him, other countries have reason to
fear us and won't attack us.
Like they feared the Nazis.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush is a failure |
30 Jan 2006 06:08:26 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd9884$0$58073$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd1aaf$0$58106$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dd0d39$0$58082$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43dcb839$0$58037$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.c | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
