| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2004 11:54:09 AM |
| Object: |
Bush The Baby Killer |
Baby Bush was aborted.
||||||||||||||||||||||
During 1971, Bush got his girlfriend pregnant and arranged an illegal abortion.
This happened about two years BEFORE the Roe-v-Wade decision.
Arrangements were made for the abortion at Twelve Oaks Hospital in Houston, Texas.
This hospital was later renamed the Bayou City Medical Center.
A witness visited the girlfriend at the hospital after the abortion.
But this is not the word of just one witness.
There exists the affidavits of four witnesses.
Details of Bush's romance with his girlfriend plus the details of the subsequent abortion are on record.
The identity of the girlfriend is on record.
The identity of the doctor who performed the abortion is on record.
Bush is now President.
And he now takes a position on the abortion issue.
Bushites claim that this abortion never happened.
They say it's a liberal lie.
___________________________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
05 Aug 2004 12:00:02 PM |
|
|
<grub@internet.charitydays.uk.co> wrote in message
news:hgp4h05huraj184nh0dih3tbbtlkqu8rgp@4ax.com...
Baby Bush was aborted.
||||||||||||||||||||||
During 1971, Bush got his girlfriend pregnant and arranged an illegal
abortion.
This happened about two years BEFORE the Roe-v-Wade decision.
Arrangements were made for the abortion at Twelve Oaks Hospital in
Houston, Texas.
This hospital was later renamed the Bayou City Medical Center.
A witness visited the girlfriend at the hospital after the abortion.
But this is not the word of just one witness.
There exists the affidavits of four witnesses.
Details of Bush's romance with his girlfriend plus the details of the
subsequent abortion are on record.
The identity of the girlfriend is on record.
The identity of the doctor who performed the abortion is on record.
Bush is now President.
And he now takes a position on the abortion issue.
Bushites claim that this abortion never happened.
They say it's a liberal lie.
I personally believe Bush is a lying sack of ***** and a moron, but it would
help if you'd throw out some cites and/or sites that corroborate what you're
saying.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
05 Aug 2004 06:01:36 PM |
|
|
On 5-Aug-2004, wrote:
A witness visited the girlfriend at the hospital after the abortion.
But this is not the word of just one witness.
There exists the affidavits of four witnesses.
Details of Bush's romance with his girlfriend plus the details of the
subsequent abortion are on record.
The identity of the girlfriend is on record.
The identity of the doctor who performed the abortion is on record.
That's great... who's records, where?
Bush is now President.
And he now takes a position on the abortion issue.
Making the assumption that what you say is true, then making a mistake in
the past should not prevent him from doing the right thing now.
Bushites claim that this abortion never happened.
They say it's a liberal lie.
Well, they (liberals) have been known to... uh... 'stretch' the truth from
time to time. Ever see a Moore film?
H
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
05 Aug 2004 08:40:04 PM |
|
|
<hughbetcha@yessiree.ca> wrote in message
news:z-2dnW2Vs67NIY_cRVn-jA@giganews.com...
On 5-Aug-2004, wrote:
A witness visited the girlfriend at the hospital after the abortion.
But this is not the word of just one witness.
There exists the affidavits of four witnesses.
Details of Bush's romance with his girlfriend plus the details of the
subsequent abortion are on record.
The identity of the girlfriend is on record.
The identity of the doctor who performed the abortion is on record.
That's great... who's records, where?
Bush is now President.
And he now takes a position on the abortion issue.
Making the assumption that what you say is true, then making a mistake in
the past should not prevent him from doing the right thing now.
No.
What it means is that he and his girlfriend got to make a choice that he now
wants to take away.
That means hypocrite any way you slice it.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
08 Aug 2004 06:44:32 PM |
|
|
On 5-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
Making the assumption that what you say is true, then making a mistake in
the past should not prevent him from doing the right thing now.
No.
What it means is that he and his girlfriend got to make a choice that he
now
wants to take away.
That means hypocrite any way you slice it.
I know of a man in my home city here, who did hard time for a few very bad
things... Now, having served his sentence, he is an ordained Brother,
helping cons and ex-cons go and stay straight. By your logic, he's a
hypocrite.
H
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 06:55:46 AM |
|
|
<hughbetcha@yessiree.ca> wrote in message
news:4tqdneh6vYJFJ4vcRVn-ow@giganews.com...
On 5-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
Making the assumption that what you say is true, then making a mistake
in
the past should not prevent him from doing the right thing now.
No.
What it means is that he and his girlfriend got to make a choice that he
now
wants to take away.
That means hypocrite any way you slice it.
I know of a man in my home city here, who did hard time for a few very bad
things... Now, having served his sentence, he is an ordained Brother,
helping cons and ex-cons go and stay straight. By your logic, he's a
hypocrite.
H
So now you equate "crime" with "women chosing the course of their own lives
without interference."
By your logic, your a Dumbass.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cody" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 07:05:01 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote
By your logic, your a Dumbass.
-Donald in Austin
You're calling people a "dumbass" and you admit you live in Texas!?
Cody
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 11:03:08 AM |
|
|
"Cody" <highwayshoes@hotmail.com.net> wrote in message
news:NLJRc.1003$Ul5.1713260@news.ono.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote
By your logic, your a Dumbass.
-Donald in Austin
You're calling people a "dumbass" and you admit you live in Texas!?
Cody
Damn right, Dumbass. Better yet, I live in Austin....
There's two kinds of people: those that live in Austin, and those that wish
they did.
.....and....
If a man's from Texas, he'll tell you. If not, don't embarass him by asking
where he's from.
You're jealous, aren't you Dumbass?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cody" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 11:37:28 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote
"Cody" <highwayshoes@hotmail.com.net> wrote in message
news:NLJRc.1003$Ul5.1713260@news.ono.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote
By your logic, your a Dumbass.
-Donald in Austin
You're calling people a "dumbass" and you admit you live in Texas!?
Cody
Damn right, Dumbass. Better yet, I live in Austin....
There's two kinds of people: those that live in Austin, and those that
wish
they did.
....and....
If a man's from Texas, he'll tell you. If not, don't embarass him by
asking
where he's from.
You're jealous, aren't you Dumbass?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
I lived in Austin and, unlike you, I was smart enough to leave so, no, I am
not "jealous". I didn't care for living in a oven full of bugs in the summer
and freezing my ***** off in the winter. Not to mention the fact that
listening to a Texas accent is worse than listening to the sound of
someone's finger nails scratching a black board.
Cody
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 04:34:02 PM |
|
|
On 9-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
I know of a man in my home city here, who did hard time for a few very
bad
things... Now, having served his sentence, he is an ordained Brother,
helping cons and ex-cons go and stay straight. By your logic, he's a
hypocrite.
H
So now you equate "crime" with "women chosing the course of their own
lives
without interference."
Actually, yes. A woman may certainly choose the course of her own life, but
she cannot abdicate responsibility, either. A child in-utero is her
responsibilty, and killing it is a crime.
By your logic, your a Dumbass.
Okay, maybe I fit the definition of dumbass in Austin. Where I'm from, It's
a little different.
H
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 04:57:38 PM |
|
|
<hughbetcha@yessiree.ca> wrote in message
news:SImdnR1ZwK5dcIrcRVn-rg@giganews.com...
On 9-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
I know of a man in my home city here, who did hard time for a few very
bad
things... Now, having served his sentence, he is an ordained Brother,
helping cons and ex-cons go and stay straight. By your logic, he's a
hypocrite.
H
So now you equate "crime" with "women chosing the course of their own
lives
without interference."
Actually, yes. A woman may certainly choose the course of her own life,
I'm glad we agree.
but
she cannot abdicate responsibility, either.
She doesn't ask you for money, help, nothing. She takes FULL responsibility
for her actions, and lives with her own decisions. By definition, she has
abdicated nothing.
She just makes a choice that you don't like, and that pisses you off. Deal
with your control issues on your own time, and leave women alone to
determine the course of their own lives.
Adoption, on the other hand, is a completely different story. Giving birth
to a child, and then letting someone else raise it....*THAT* is abdicating
responsibility.
A child in-utero
Is a fantasy on your part, and has nothing to do with reality.
is her
responsibilty,
Already addressed. Since you're all for "responsibility," why don't you push
for a ban on adoption?
and killing it is a crime.
Have you called the police to report this 'crime?'
No?
Then I guess it is obvious that you know what the truth really is, and
further, that you are full of *****.
By your logic, you're a Dumbass.
Okay, maybe I fit the definition of dumbass in Austin. Where I'm from,
It's
a little different.
Anyone else would call you a stupid *****, but I *was* trying to be
polite.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 06:03:21 PM |
|
|
On 9-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
Actually, yes. A woman may certainly choose the course of her own life,
I'm glad we agree.
but
she cannot abdicate responsibility, either.
She doesn't ask you for money, help, nothing. She takes FULL
responsibility
for her actions, and lives with her own decisions. By definition, she has
abdicated nothing.
She IS abdicating responsibilty for the life that she has helped create.
Killing it and flushing it down the drain is NOT accepting responsibilty.
Adoption, on the other hand, is a completely different story. Giving birth
to a child, and then letting someone else raise it....*THAT* is abdicating
responsibility.
It is baffling how you can rationalize that. Killing it is better than
giving it to a family that will love it, raise it and give it a life?
A child in-utero
Is a fantasy on your part, and has nothing to do with reality.
Are you suggesting that it is not a child? Does something magical happen at
the moment it's born that makes it a person and not an inconvinience? Or,
are you are in favour of killing newborns as well, one must wonder.
is her
responsibilty,
Already addressed. Since you're all for "responsibility," why don't you
push
for a ban on adoption?
What of the adoptive parents? Are they responsible? Is their willingness to
commit their lives to raising an unwanted child make them generous, or
fools?
and killing it is a crime.
Have you called the police to report this 'crime?'
No?
Then I guess it is obvious that you know what the truth really is, and
further, that you are full of *****.
Of course, an act of Congress has determined that an unborn child is not a
person, and not entilted to the protection of the law. Part of a social
trend that is trying to turn a woman's reproductive power into a non-issue,
and reduce her back to the status of sex object. How's them apples?
By your logic, you're a Dumbass.
Okay, maybe I fit the definition of dumbass in Austin. Where I'm from,
It's
a little different.
Anyone else would call you a stupid *****, but I *was* trying to be
polite.
Ah, yes, that famous Texas cordiality.
H
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cody" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
09 Aug 2004 06:38:32 PM |
|
|
The old "when life begins" argument. Here's the truth:
A Catholic priest, a medical doctor and a Rabbi were discussing when "life
begins":
Doctor: Life begins at birth.
Catholic priest: No, no, life begins at conception!
Rabbi: You're both wrong. Life begins when the kids leave home and the dog
dies.
Cody
<hughbetcha@yessiree.ca> wrote in message
news:ws6dnRIiOrgyn4XcRVn-sg@giganews.com...
On 9-Aug-2004, "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote:
Actually, yes. A woman may certainly choose the course of her own
life,
I'm glad we agree.
but
she cannot abdicate responsibility, either.
She doesn't ask you for money, help, nothing. She takes FULL
responsibility
for her actions, and lives with her own decisions. By definition, she
has
abdicated nothing.
She IS abdicating responsibilty for the life that she has helped create.
Killing it and flushing it down the drain is NOT accepting responsibilty.
Adoption, on the other hand, is a completely different story. Giving
birth
to a child, and then letting someone else raise it....*THAT* is
abdicating
responsibility.
It is baffling how you can rationalize that. Killing it is better than
giving it to a family that will love it, raise it and give it a life?
A child in-utero
Is a fantasy on your part, and has nothing to do with reality.
Are you suggesting that it is not a child? Does something magical happen
at
the moment it's born that makes it a person and not an inconvinience? Or,
are you are in favour of killing newborns as well, one must wonder.
is her
responsibilty,
Already addressed. Since you're all for "responsibility," why don't you
push
for a ban on adoption?
What of the adoptive parents? Are they responsible? Is their willingness
to
commit their lives to raising an unwanted child make them generous, or
fools?
and killing it is a crime.
Have you called the police to report this 'crime?'
No?
Then I guess it is obvious that you know what the truth really is, and
further, that you are full of *****.
Of course, an act of Congress has determined that an unborn child is not a
person, and not entilted to the protection of the law. Part of a social
trend that is trying to turn a woman's reproductive power into a
non-issue,
and reduce her back to the status of sex object. How's them apples?
By your logic, you're a Dumbass.
Okay, maybe I fit the definition of dumbass in Austin. Where I'm from,
It's
a little different.
Anyone else would call you a stupid *****, but I *was* trying to
be
polite.
Ah, yes, that famous Texas cordiality.
H
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Tirebiter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush The Baby Killer |
05 Aug 2004 09:50:57 PM |
|
|
In article <z-2dnW2Vs67NIY_cRVn-jA@giganews.com>,
wrote:
On 5-Aug-2004, wrote:
A witness visited the girlfriend at the hospital after the abortion.
But this is not the word of just one witness.
There exists the affidavits of four witnesses.
Details of Bush's romance with his girlfriend plus the details of the
subsequent abortion are on record.
The identity of the girlfriend is on record.
The identity of the doctor who performed the abortion is on record.
That's great... who's records, where?
This is a rumor that has been floating around the internet for ages. I have
never seen anything to indicate that anyone has ever investigated it,
confirmed any of it or refuted any of it. Nor have I ever heard any Bush
person address it or deny it.
http://www.bartcop.com/bushabortion.htm
http://andymatic.com/archives/000205.html
http://www.nola.com/forums/soundoff/index.ssf?artid=279078
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
