BYE IDIOTS!



 Science > Abortion > BYE IDIOTS!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "John D.Wentzky"
Date: 16 Aug 2006 08:06:05 PM
Object: BYE IDIOTS!
Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.
.

User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 11:24:22 AM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Translation: you'll be back after you've forgotten this latest proclamation.
(I give it fifteen minutes at best.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 12:33:32 PM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk1wrfpbyh.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.


Translation: you'll be back after you've forgotten this latest
proclamation.
(I give it fifteen minutes at best.)

Well, a temporary goodbye is better than none, right?
I didn't get back in time to add to my post.
I am tired of calling people idiots, are you?


--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 10:32:08 PM
On 17/08/2006 "John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk1wrfpbyh.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Translation: you'll be back after you've forgotten this latest
proclamation.
(I give it fifteen minutes at best.)

Well, a temporary goodbye is better than none, right?
I didn't get back in time to add to my post.
I am tired of calling people idiots, are you?

You'll revert about as soon as you dump your response to NNTP.
begin 644 .signature
M("!0871R:6-K(")4:&4@0VAI968@26YS=&EG871O<B(@2'5M<&AR97D@*'!A
M=')I8VM`:6\N8V]M*2`@2&]U<W1O;BP@5&5X87,*("`@("!W=W<N8VAI969I
M;G-T:6=A=&]R+G5S+G1T+V%E<F]S+G!H<"`@*%1#22=S(#(P,#0M,#4@2&]U
M<W1O;B!!97)O<RD*("`@("`@("`@("`@("`@($Q!4U0@1T%-13H@0VEN8VEN
M;F%T:2`S+"!(;W5S=&]N(#`@*$%P<FEL(#@I"B`@("`@("`@("`@("!.15A4
M($=!344Z("!3871U<F1A>2P@07!R:6P@.2!A="!386X@06YT;VYI;RP@-CHS
!-4=!
`
end
.



User: "Anamika"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 12:45:24 PM
John D.Wentzky wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Bye, fuckwit.
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 03:14:03 PM
"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1155836724.608728.55770@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...


John D.Wentzky wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.


Bye, fuckwit.

Does that mean that Pro-Choicers are abstinent?
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 06:23:43 PM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1155836724.608728.55770@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

John D.Wentzky wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Bye, fuckwit.

Does that mean that Pro-Choicers are abstinent?

It means you can't read and understand.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.

User: "Anamika"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 04:36:43 PM
John D.Wentzky wrote:

"Anamika" <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote in message
news:1155836724.608728.55770@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...


John D.Wentzky wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.


Bye, fuckwit.


Does that mean that Pro-Choicers are abstinent?

It means goodbye in response to your "BYE IDIOTS" post, dimwit.
.



User: "robpar"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 11:57:50 AM
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 12:37:44 PM
"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.

Oh. I didn't know that.
At least you are against liars, right?
Imo, if you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will
find lies in them.
part of government interference comes from such things.
Part of the problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things;
which causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.
They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at times,
or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but then
again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.
I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their agendas
in the face of so much opposition.
Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be in
jeopardy.
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 06:23:11 PM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.

Oh. I didn't know that.
At least you are against liars, right?
Imo, if you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will
find lies in them.

What if he investigates your agenda?

part of government interference comes from such things.
Part of the problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things;
which causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.

If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at times,
or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but then
again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.

You don't need to be, if they are.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their agendas
in the face of so much opposition.

....which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be in
jeopardy.

You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 06:55:57 PM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:


Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.


Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.


Oh. I didn't know that.
At least you are against liars, right?
Imo, if you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will
find lies in them.


What if he investigates your agenda?

What is my agenda?
Why would I be afraid of him?
He isn't into lying to the public either it seems.

part of government interference comes from such things.
Part of the problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such
things;
which causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as
a
threat to their security.


If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

Me paranoid?
Is that why I don't like lying to the public?

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times,
or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but then
again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.


You don't need to be, if they are.

Maybe so.
Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of the time.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas
in the face of so much opposition.


...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.

Really?

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be
in
jeopardy.


You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.

So, what next?
Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?
If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations will be
reluctant to sponsor them.
Do you think the people in the towns where they do those parades are wanting
riots in their towns?


--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 17 Aug 2006 08:56:57 PM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage types.

Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.

Oh. I didn't know that.
At least you are against liars, right?
Imo, if you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will
find lies in them.

What if he investigates your agenda?

What is my agenda?
Why would I be afraid of him?
He isn't into lying to the public either it seems.

*yawn* Just admit you have no idea of what you're babbling about, for once in
your life.

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things; which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.

If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?

Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops, as well as branding people as
criminals for nothing other than disagreeing with you, is respectable? Maybe
in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this planet.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at times,
or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but then
again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.

You don't need to be, if they are.

Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of the
time.

Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their agendas
in the face of so much opposition.

...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.

Really?

"so much opposition"...in your opinion? That can be laughed at safely.

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be in
jeopardy.

You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.

So, what next?
Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?

No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations will be
reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns where they
do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?

So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million? Consider
that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000 or so
heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route, enjoying a
mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a summer Saturday
night along the road that used to lead to Max Westheimer's farm way out in the
western wilderness, back when the city extended all of two miles away from
downtown.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 18 Aug 2006 08:24:38 AM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:


Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage
types.


Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.


Oh. I didn't know that.
At least you are against liars, right?
Imo, if you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you
will
find lies in them.


What if he investigates your agenda?


What is my agenda?
Why would I be afraid of him?
He isn't into lying to the public either it seems.


*yawn* Just admit you have no idea of what you're babbling about, for
once in
your life.

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things; which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.


If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.


Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?


Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,

What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.
The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.

as well as branding people as criminals for nothing other than disagreeing
with you, is respectable?

Maybe in your world it isn't.
If you would pay attention and notice when the former Attorney General
himself, Ashcroft, called the Justice Department, the "Criminal" Justice
Department, maybe you would know there are too many criminals in government.
And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic records?
Huh?
Why are they so afriad to turn them over?
LOL!
If they were innocent they wouldn't resist so much.

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this planet.

Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.
Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status quo,
too.
When you gonna stop denying the duopoly exists in the USA and start acting
like an E Pluribus Unum type?
When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it is
written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens, instead
of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily shown to be
part of the United States?
When will you become a bonafide U.S. Citizen?

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times,
or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but then
again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.


You don't need to be, if they are.


Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of
the
time.


Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.

You telling me to be accurate?
Why don't you do some research and try to conform to the principles of the
USA instead of avoiding them?

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas
in the face of so much opposition.


...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.


Really?


"so much opposition"...in your opinion?

So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade are
you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?

That can be laughed at safely.

Funny thing is the people who get the last laugh are alive.

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be
in
jeopardy.


You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.


So, what next?
Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?


No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.

What sort of Pride Parade?
How about that racist organization called HispanicAIDSForum that got their
suit slapped down already?
Why is it men don't like dragqueens in their bathrooms and women don;t like
them in their bathrooms either?
Think about it.
When it says Men on the door you are expected to look like a man and dress
like a man.
When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman.
If you can not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the bitches
those who ***** are?

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations will
be
reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns where
they
do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?


So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million?

I have no idea and I am not sure what disctrict such a parade is in there.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000 or
so
heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route, enjoying
a
mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a summer
Saturday
night along the road that used to lead to Max Westheimer's farm way out in
the
western wilderness, back when the city extended all of two miles away from
downtown.

I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two towns
already.
If you are a real liberty advocate you should read the law and stop acting
like every person has a right to do what it termed to be legal here.
There are a quite a few things in practice in the USA now that are not in
line with overriding mandates.
Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.


--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 18 Aug 2006 08:52:42 AM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:

Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage
types.

Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.

Oh. I didn't know that. At least you are against liars, right? Imo, if
you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will find
lies in them.

What if he investigates your agenda?

What is my agenda? Why would I be afraid of him? He isn't into lying to
the public either it seems.

*yawn* Just admit you have no idea of what you're babbling about, for once
in your life.

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things; which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.

If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?

Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,

What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.

You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations from on
high.

The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.

Cops are busy being in real life, moron.

as well as branding people as criminals for nothing other than disagreeing
with you, is respectable?

Maybe in your world it isn't.

....and it's just a coincidence that you've excluded yourself from that world.

If you would pay attention and notice when the former Attorney General
himself, Ashcroft, called the Justice Department, the "Criminal" Justice
Department, maybe you would know there are too many criminals in government.

If you could understand what you read, you wouldn't be the foaming kook who's
been nominated for the Looney Maroon Award.

And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic records?
Huh? Why are they so afriad to turn them over? LOL! If they were innocent
they wouldn't resist so much.

Where's your proof? (No, not the bottle with the "102" on it.)

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this planet.

Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.

That's in your imagination.

Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status quo,
too.

It's normal, as far as I'm concerned. Better not get near Canada *or*
Massachusetts, if you really believe your own hallucinations.

When you gonna stop denying the duopoly exists in the USA and start acting
like an E Pluribus Unum type?

I've been doing that most of my life...and I don't bow to mentally defective
slobs like you who have no authority over anything.

When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it is
written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens, instead
of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily shown to be
part of the United States?
When will you become a bonafide U.S. Citizen?

I've only been one since I was born, unlike you.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times, or they get that feeling more often than I think they should, but
then again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.

You don't need to be, if they are.

Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of the
time.

Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.

You telling me to be accurate? Why don't you do some research and try to
conform to the principles of the USA instead of avoiding them?

Been there, done that...you're still a raving crackpot.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas in the face of so much opposition.

...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.

Really?

"so much opposition"...in your opinion?

So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade are
you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?

I'm sorry for Furman's image being slimed by your association with them.

That can be laughed at safely.

Funny thing is the people who get the last laugh are alive.

You laugh at just about everything you don't understand, in this forum...which
means you laugh at just about everything.

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to be
in jeopardy.

You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.

So, what next? Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?

No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.

What sort of Pride Parade?

What the ***** do you think? It's Gay Pride.

How about that racist organization called HispanicAIDSForum that got their
suit slapped down already?

How about you dragging in irrelevancies when you notice your argument is the
same ***** as it has been since you were first let out of the Home?

Why is it men don't like dragqueens in their bathrooms and women don;t like
them in their bathrooms either?
Think about it.

You obviously spend a lot of your time thinking about it. I've got better
things to do.

When it says Men on the door you are expected to look like a man and dress
like a man.

Do you have a point, or are you just mumbling?

When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman.
If you can not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the bitches
those who ***** are?

Could you be bothered to explain what the hell you're trying to say, for once?

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations will
be reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns where
they do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?

So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million?

I have no idea and I am not sure what disctrict such a parade is in there.

You can't read to save your worthless life, Wentzky. I told you where it is.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000 or
so heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route,
enjoying a mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a
summer Saturday night along the road that used to lead to Max Westheimer's
farm way out in the western wilderness, back when the city extended all of
two miles away from downtown.

I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two towns
already.

So what? Two towns in 30-odd years...that's a safer record than you'll ever
be able to boast.

If you are a real liberty advocate you should read the law and stop acting
like every person has a right to do what it termed to be legal here.
There are a quite a few things in practice in the USA now that are not in
line with overriding mandates.

No one gives a damn about your delusions of adequacy.

Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.

Ergo, you're AWOL from the Home yet again.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 18 Aug 2006 12:45:09 PM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpseyf8wl.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"robpar" <robpar@netportusa.com> wrote in message
news:fr79e2171la1rf4psio7rqigrp3sdin4k2@4ax.com...

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:06:05 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:


Except for robpar and the other pro-lifers and anti-gay marriage
types.


Is this some troll using a stolen name?
John knows I am pro-choice, and support gay rights, and
oppose government interference in the lives of people.


Oh. I didn't know that. At least you are against liars, right? Imo,
if
you investigate the pro-choice and gay sectarian agendas you will find
lies in them.


What if he investigates your agenda?


What is my agenda? Why would I be afraid of him? He isn't into lying
to
the public either it seems.


*yawn* Just admit you have no idea of what you're babbling about, for
once
in your life.


part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things; which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.


If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.


Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?


Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,


What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.


You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations from on
high.

Does that mean anything that doesn't align with the Constitution?

The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.


Cops are busy being in real life, moron.

Isn't that the objective?
So, they can be in real life with the rest of us?

as well as branding people as criminals for nothing other than
disagreeing
with you, is respectable?


Maybe in your world it isn't.


...and it's just a coincidence that you've excluded yourself from that
world.

If you would pay attention and notice when the former Attorney General
himself, Ashcroft, called the Justice Department, the "Criminal" Justice
Department, maybe you would know there are too many criminals in
government.


If you could understand what you read, you wouldn't be the foaming kook
who's
been nominated for the Looney Maroon Award.

And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic
records?
Huh? Why are they so afriad to turn them over? LOL! If they were
innocent
they wouldn't resist so much.


Where's your proof? (No, not the bottle with the "102" on it.)

My proof of their innocence?
Do you think they resist because they would prove their innocence if they
turned over the records?

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this planet.


Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.


That's in your imagination.

You think it isn't the status quo now?
Try to understand what Pro-Choice means now, without denying the choice to
abort.

Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status quo,
too.


It's normal, as far as I'm concerned.

So much so that HIV has been eradicated already?

Better not get near Canada *or*
Massachusetts, if you really believe your own hallucinations.

When you gonna stop denying the duopoly exists in the USA and start acting
like an E Pluribus Unum type?


I've been doing that most of my life...and I don't bow to mentally
defective
slobs like you who have no authority over anything.

When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it
is
written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens, instead
of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily shown to
be
part of the United States?
When will you become a bonafide U.S. Citizen?


I've only been one since I was born, unlike you.

That's all it takes per the Constitution's requirement for citizenship, I
know; but, there are many others words in print here that are designed to
make the USA a good nation.
If you think you are supposed to pick the ones that work for you and ignore
the ones that you don't like because of your personal opinion, then how do
you expect to be recognized as a real American?

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times, or they get that feeling more often than I think they should,
but
then again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing them.


You don't need to be, if they are.


Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of
the
time.


Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.


You telling me to be accurate? Why don't you do some research and try to
conform to the principles of the USA instead of avoiding them?


Been there, done that...you're still a raving crackpot.

Oh, well. You still doing it I assume, right?

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas in the face of so much opposition.


...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.


Really?


"so much opposition"...in your opinion?


So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade
are
you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?


I'm sorry for Furman's image being slimed by your association with them.

Furman's image is slimed by Gay Pride Parades which incite riots?

That can be laughed at safely.


Funny thing is the people who get the last laugh are alive.


You laugh at just about everything you don't understand, in this
forum...which
means you laugh at just about everything.

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to
be
in jeopardy.


You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.


So, what next? Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?


No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.


What sort of Pride Parade?


What the ***** do you think? It's Gay Pride.

Wow. I wonder just how much the people trust HPD then?
Good thing you told us. Maybe there will be some emigration from Enron
addled Houston soon.
Maybe the NASD will send me enouigh cash so normal people can have a safe
place to live.

How about that racist organization called HispanicAIDSForum that got their
suit slapped down already?


How about you dragging in irrelevancies when you notice your argument is
the
same ***** as it has been since you were first let out of the Home?

You don't like the judges decision in that case?

Why is it men don't like dragqueens in their bathrooms and women don;t
like
them in their bathrooms either?
Think about it.


You obviously spend a lot of your time thinking about it. I've got better
things to do.

Like dressing in drag to visit women's rest rooms?

When it says Men on the door you are expected to look like a man and dress
like a man.


Do you have a point, or are you just mumbling?

Yes. Men are not comfortable with people coming into their bathroom dressed
like women.

When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman.
If you can not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the
bitches
those who ***** are?


Could you be bothered to explain what the hell you're trying to say, for
once?

Do you think those queenieboy types can act like men so people will treat
them like men?

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations
will
be reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns
where
they do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?


So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million?


I have no idea and I am not sure what district such a parade is in there.


You can't read to save your worthless life, Wentzky. I told you where it
is.

In the paragraph immediately below?
I thought you would say something like 2nd Avenue or whatever the street is.
Not to worry, though. I am sure people can find the exact location online.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000
or
so heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route,
enjoying a mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a
summer Saturday night along the road that used to lead to Max
Westheimer's
farm way out in the western wilderness, back when the city extended all
of
two miles away from downtown.


I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two towns
already.


So what? Two towns in 30-odd years...that's a safer record than you'll
ever
be able to boast.

Two towns within two years is more the case.

If you are a real liberty advocate you should read the law and stop acting
like every person has a right to do what it termed to be legal here.
There are a quite a few things in practice in the USA now that are not in
line with overriding mandates.


No one gives a damn about your delusions of adequacy.

Do delusions come from not whining for special/unequal protections in law?

Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.


Ergo, you're AWOL from the Home yet again.

The Home?


--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 18 Aug 2006 05:16:36 PM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpseyf8wl.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

[...]

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things; which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as a
threat to their security.

If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?

Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,

What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.

You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations from on
high.

Does that mean anything that doesn't align with the Constitution?

Learn to read for context, and you'll have your answer.

The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.

Cops are busy being in real life, moron.

Isn't that the objective?
So, they can be in real life with the rest of us?

You're truly brain-damaged, son...they're out there to protect and serve.
[...]

If you would pay attention and notice when the former Attorney General
himself, Ashcroft, called the Justice Department, the "Criminal" Justice
Department, maybe you would know there are too many criminals in
government.

If you could understand what you read, you wouldn't be the foaming kook
who's
been nominated for the Looney Maroon Award.

And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic records?
Huh? Why are they so afriad to turn them over? LOL! If they were
innocent they wouldn't resist so much.

Where's your proof? (No, not the bottle with the "102" on it.)

My proof of their innocence?
Do you think they resist because they would prove their innocence if they
turned over the records?

Idiot! Your proof that they have something to hide. Of course, if you're so
goddamned sure of yourself, when may we expect you to post YOUR medical
records?

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this planet.

Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.

That's in your imagination.

You think it isn't the status quo now?

I live in reality. You don't.

Try to understand what Pro-Choice means now, without denying the choice to
abort.

You have no idea what pro-choice is about...and you've only spent the better
part of a decade in proving that.

Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status quo,
too.

It's normal, as far as I'm concerned.

So much so that HIV has been eradicated already?

Would you mind putting the crack pipe down?
[...]

When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it is
written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens, instead
of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily shown to
be part of the United States? When will you become a bonafide
U.S. Citizen?

I've only been one since I was born, unlike you.

That's all it takes per the Constitution's requirement for citizenship, I
know; but, there are many others words in print here that are designed to
make the USA a good nation.
If you think you are supposed to pick the ones that work for you and ignore
the ones that you don't like because of your personal opinion, then how do
you expect to be recognized as a real American?

I couldn't care less whether John D. Wentzky, the official lunatic of
Anderson, South Carolina, thinks I'm a real American or not...because you
don't get to decide that for anyone.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times, or they get that feeling more often than I think they should,
but then again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing
them.

You don't need to be, if they are.

Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of
the time.

Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.

You telling me to be accurate? Why don't you do some research and try to
conform to the principles of the USA instead of avoiding them?

Been there, done that...you're still a raving crackpot.

Oh, well. You still doing it I assume, right?

I'm still defending my country from morons like you.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas in the face of so much opposition.

...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that shredded
imagination of yours.

Really?

"so much opposition"...in your opinion?

So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade are
you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?

I'm sorry for Furman's image being slimed by your association with them.

Furman's image is slimed by Gay Pride Parades which incite riots?

Furman's image is not being helped by your insanity being posted under their
name. (Dance all you want to, but furman.edu is part of your e-mail address.
They'll get around to asking you to find somewhere else to abuse, sooner or
later.)
[...]

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to
be in jeopardy.

You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.

So, what next? Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?

No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.

What sort of Pride Parade?

What the ***** do you think? It's Gay Pride.

Wow. I wonder just how much the people trust HPD then?

More so than they'd trust you.

Good thing you told us. Maybe there will be some emigration from Enron
addled Houston soon.

Maybe you're smoking crack again...since Enron was five years ago, and Houston
has more people here now than then. Sorry to poke a hole in that dream of
yours, but such is reality.

Maybe the NASD will send me enouigh cash so normal people can have a safe
place to live.

Maybe they'll send you back to the Home.

How about that racist organization called HispanicAIDSForum that got their
suit slapped down already?

How about you dragging in irrelevancies when you notice your argument is
the same ***** as it has been since you were first let out of the Home?

You don't like the judges decision in that case?

I'd have to read it before I decided.

Why is it men don't like dragqueens in their bathrooms and women don;t like
them in their bathrooms either? Think about it.

You obviously spend a lot of your time thinking about it. I've got better
things to do.

Like dressing in drag to visit women's rest rooms?

Why would you be interested in that? I'm not.

When it says Men on the door you are expected to look like a man and dress
like a man.

Do you have a point, or are you just mumbling?

Yes. Men are not comfortable with people coming into their bathroom dressed
like women.

So, maybe you shouldn't do it, then.

When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman. If you can
not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the bitches those who
***** are?

Could you be bothered to explain what the hell you're trying to say, for
once?

Do you think those queenieboy types can act like men so people will treat
them like men?

Do you think APD appreciates having to keep an eye on you because of your
hatred of homosexuals?

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations will
be reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns where
they do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?

So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million?

I have no idea and I am not sure what district such a parade is in there.

You can't read to save your worthless life, Wentzky. I told you where it
is.

In the paragraph immediately below?

Bingo.

I thought you would say something like 2nd Avenue or whatever the street is.
Not to worry, though. I am sure people can find the exact location online.

Normal people can. You, I'd doubt.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000
or so heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route,
enjoying a mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a
summer Saturday night along the road that used to lead to Max
Westheimer's farm way out in the western wilderness, back when the city
extended all of two miles away from downtown.

I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two towns
already.

So what? Two towns in 30-odd years...that's a safer record than you'll
ever be able to boast.

Two towns within two years is more the case.

Pride parades have been happening for 30-odd years, moron. Are you upset
because you didn't get to provoke a riot?

If you are a real liberty advocate you should read the law and stop acting
like every person has a right to do what it termed to be legal here.
There are a quite a few things in practice in the USA now that are not in
line with overriding mandates.

No one gives a damn about your delusions of adequacy.

Do delusions come from not whining for special/unequal protections in law?

Yours come from your choice to be insane.

Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.

Ergo, you're AWOL from the Home yet again.

The Home?

You're obviously mentally ill enough to be under some doctor's care.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 19 Aug 2006 11:09:34 AM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr6zdd70b.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpseyf8wl.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


[...]

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things;
which
causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to themselves as
a
threat to their security.


If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.


Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?


Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,


What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.


You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations from
on
high.


Does that mean anything that doesn't align with the Constitution?


Learn to read for context, and you'll have your answer.

I did. Will you learn to do as you tell others to do?

The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.


Cops are busy being in real life, moron.


Isn't that the objective?
So, they can be in real life with the rest of us?


You're truly brain-damaged, son...they're out there to protect and serve.

Which means you don't think they can be in real life like the rest of the
population?

[...]

If you would pay attention and notice when the former Attorney General
himself, Ashcroft, called the Justice Department, the "Criminal" Justice
Department, maybe you would know there are too many criminals in
government.


If you could understand what you read, you wouldn't be the foaming kook
who's
been nominated for the Looney Maroon Award.


And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic
records?
Huh? Why are they so afriad to turn them over? LOL! If they were
innocent they wouldn't resist so much.


Where's your proof? (No, not the bottle with the "102" on it.)


My proof of their innocence?
Do you think they resist because they would prove their innocence if they
turned over the records?


Idiot! Your proof that they have something to hide.

LOL! You think you can pin anyone down with that when they *are* hiding so
many violations of the law?

Of course, if you're so goddamned sure of yourself, when may we expect you
to post YOUR medical
records?

Do you mean my abortion medical history?
LOL!

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this
planet.


Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.


That's in your imagination.


You think it isn't the status quo now?


I live in reality.

Where you know it is the status quo, huh?

You don't.

Weird.

Try to understand what Pro-Choice means now, without denying the choice to
abort.


You have no idea what pro-choice is about...and you've only spent the
better
part of a decade in proving that.

More denial going to make you any more believable?

Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status
quo,
too.


It's normal, as far as I'm concerned.


So much so that HIV has been eradicated already?


Would you mind putting the crack pipe down?

Would you stop living in denial and ignorance and refusal to admit every
piece of the puzzle into your thinking?

[...]

When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it
is
written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens,
instead
of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily shown
to
be part of the United States? When will you become a bonafide
U.S. Citizen?


I've only been one since I was born, unlike you.


That's all it takes per the Constitution's requirement for citizenship, I
know; but, there are many others words in print here that are designed to
make the USA a good nation.
If you think you are supposed to pick the ones that work for you and
ignore
the ones that you don't like because of your personal opinion, then how do
you expect to be recognized as a real American?


I couldn't care less whether John D. Wentzky, the official lunatic of
Anderson, South Carolina, thinks I'm a real American or not...because you
don't get to decide that for anyone.

I read the words and don't try to squirm around them or avoid them like the
plague as some do.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times, or they get that feeling more often than I think they should,
but then again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing
them.


You don't need to be, if they are.


Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most
of
the time.


Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.


You telling me to be accurate? Why don't you do some research and try
to
conform to the principles of the USA instead of avoiding them?


Been there, done that...you're still a raving crackpot.


Oh, well. You still doing it I assume, right?


I'm still defending my country from morons like you.

You defend the USA from Constitutionalists?

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas in the face of so much opposition.


...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that
shredded
imagination of yours.


Really?


"so much opposition"...in your opinion?


So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade
are
you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?


I'm sorry for Furman's image being slimed by your association with them.


Furman's image is slimed by Gay Pride Parades which incite riots?


Furman's image is not being helped by your insanity being posted under
their
name. (Dance all you want to, but furman.edu is part of your e-mail
address.
They'll get around to asking you to find somewhere else to abuse, sooner
or
later.)

Somewhere else to abuse?
I am not abusing their system.
It is a forwarding address.
Emails do not go to a mailbox with that address attached to it.

[...]

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them
to
be in jeopardy.


You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.


So, what next? Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?


No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.


What sort of Pride Parade?


What the ***** do you think? It's Gay Pride.


Wow. I wonder just how much the people trust HPD then?


More so than they'd trust you.

Meaning gay's trust the HPD more than straights?
LOL!
Why do you even open your mouth with such statements?
Are you trying to mar their reputation firther?
They could tell you to stop doing that.
I know real quick when someone chooses favorites what kind of people they
are.
Are you telling me that the HPD is now a gay defending, anti-straight,
abortionistic security patrol in Houston?

Good thing you told us. Maybe there will be some emigration from Enron
addled Houston soon.


Maybe you're smoking crack again...since Enron was five years ago, and
Houston
has more people here now than then. Sorry to poke a hole in that dream of
yours, but such is reality.

Well, you can go the way of New Orleans and wait on another Hurricane.
Do you think I am going to lose any rest because of that?
LOL!

Maybe the NASD will send me enough cash so normal people can have a safe
place to live.


Maybe they'll send you back to the Home.

They have no authority to fulfill your anti-liberty fantasies.
Your fantasy there is illegal.

How about that racist organization called HispanicAIDSForum that got
their
suit slapped down already?


How about you dragging in irrelevancies when you notice your argument is
the same ***** as it has been since you were first let out of the
Home?


You don't like the judges decision in that case?


I'd have to read it before I decided.

Why is it men don't like dragqueens in their bathrooms and women don;t
like
them in their bathrooms either? Think about it.


You obviously spend a lot of your time thinking about it. I've got
better
things to do.


Like dressing in drag to visit women's rest rooms?


Why would you be interested in that? I'm not.

When it says Men on the door you are expected to look like a man and
dress
like a man.


Do you have a point, or are you just mumbling?


Yes. Men are not comfortable with people coming into their bathroom
dressed
like women.


So, maybe you shouldn't do it, then.

When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman. If you
can
not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the bitches those
who
***** are?


Could you be bothered to explain what the hell you're trying to say, for
once?


Do you think those queenieboy types can act like men so people will treat
them like men?


Do you think APD appreciates having to keep an eye on you because of your
hatred of homosexuals?

What hatred? Can't you understand that I am being objective?
See?
One of your faults is you hinge on one or two statements another person made
far in the past, and it hurts your mind.
Your reluctance to grow by being so self-deceived is quite obvious.

If there is too much trouble at those events cities and corporations
will
be reluctant to sponsor them. Do you think the people in the towns
where
they do those parades are wanting riots in their towns?


So, where's the outcry against them in this "town" of five million?


I have no idea and I am not sure what district such a parade is in
there.


You can't read to save your worthless life, Wentzky. I told you where
it
is.


In the paragraph immediately below?


Bingo.

I thought you would say something like 2nd Avenue or whatever the street
is.
Not to worry, though. I am sure people can find the exact location online.


Normal people can. You, I'd doubt.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about
145,000
or so heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade
route,
enjoying a mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a
summer Saturday night along the road that used to lead to Max
Westheimer's farm way out in the western wilderness, back when the
city
extended all of two miles away from downtown.


I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two
towns
already.


So what? Two towns in 30-odd years...that's a safer record than you'll
ever be able to boast.


Two towns within two years is more the case.


Pride parades have been happening for 30-odd years, moron. Are you upset
because you didn't get to provoke a riot?

Your refusal to notice two occurrences within two years, huh?
Just like the abortionists who like to spread all abortions amongst the
entire female population.
Liars are so descpicable.
They look for ways to slide the blame amongst the
innocents/non-participants.

If you are a real liberty advocate you should read the law and stop
acting
like every person has a right to do what it termed to be legal here.
There are a quite a few things in practice in the USA now that are not
in
line with overriding mandates.


No one gives a damn about your delusions of adequacy.


Do delusions come from not whining for special/unequal protections in law?


Yours come from your choice to be insane.

Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.


Ergo, you're AWOL from the Home yet again.


The Home?


You're obviously mentally ill enough to be under some doctor's care.

You are obviously an anti-liberty anti-freedom, unconstitutional idiot.
You recommned usurious, anti-liberty actions against law abiding citizens.
That is quite unbecoming of you.
Where are your credentials to make all these medical determinations you so
routinely hurl online?

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35

.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 19 Aug 2006 12:03:20 PM
"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr6zdd70b.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpseyf8wl.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

[...]

part of government interference comes from such things. Part of the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things;
which causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to
themselves as a threat to their security.

If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.

Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?

Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,

What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.

You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations from
on high.

Does that mean anything that doesn't align with the Constitution?

Learn to read for context, and you'll have your answer.

I did. Will you learn to do as you tell others to do?

Will you learn to do as you say you do? You routinely whine "Nah." and act
like your word shouldn't be questioned.

The only thing I don't like about what I was telling you is cops lying
online.

Cops are busy being in real life, moron.

Isn't that the objective?
So, they can be in real life with the rest of us?

You're truly brain-damaged, son...they're out there to protect and serve.

Which means you don't think they can be in real life like the rest of the
population?

....which means you can't think, period.

[...]

And, why do you think all these criminals hide the abortion clinic
records? Huh? Why are they so afriad to turn them over? LOL! If they
were innocent they wouldn't resist so much.

Where's your proof? (No, not the bottle with the "102" on it.)

My proof of their innocence? Do you think they resist because they would
prove their innocence if they turned over the records?

Idiot! Your proof that they have something to hide.

LOL! You think you can pin anyone down with that when they *are* hiding so
many violations of the law?

So why aren't you calling the cops on them?

Of course, if you're so goddamned sure of yourself, when may we expect you
to post YOUR medical
records?

Do you mean my abortion medical history? LOL!

I mean your medical records, moron.

Maybe in your world, but it doesn't quite work that way on this
planet.

Maybe in your world killing babies is like the status quo.

That's in your imagination.

You think it isn't the status quo now?

I live in reality.

Where you know it is the status quo, huh?

Reality is where you're a frothing idiot who has the memory span of a mayfly,
if that much.

You don't.

Weird.

You're definitely not quite all there.

Try to understand what Pro-Choice means now, without denying the choice to
abort.

You have no idea what pro-choice is about...and you've only spent the
better part of a decade in proving that.

More denial going to make you any more believable?

A brain transplant -might- make you believable.

Maybe in your world homosexual marriage is so normal it is the status
quo, too.

It's normal, as far as I'm concerned.

So much so that HIV has been eradicated already?

Would you mind putting the crack pipe down?

Would you stop living in denial and ignorance and refusal to admit every
piece of the puzzle into your thinking?

You're the crackhead who can't figure out a two-piece puzzle.

[...]

When are all you people who are so easily shown to be anti-the USA as it
is written on things such as our currency and the Constitution going to
dispense with your other-world agenda, and act like U.S. Citizens,
instead of using the Constitution to ***** about anything that is easily
shown to be part of the United States? When will you become a bonafide
U.S. Citizen?

I've only been one since I was born, unlike you.

That's all it takes per the Constitution's requirement for citizenship, I
know; but, there are many others words in print here that are designed to
make the USA a good nation. If you think you are supposed to pick the ones
that work for you and ignore the ones that you don't like because of your
personal opinion, then how do you expect to be recognized as a real
American?

I couldn't care less whether John D. Wentzky, the official lunatic of
Anderson, South Carolina, thinks I'm a real American or not...because you
don't get to decide that for anyone.

I read the words and don't try to squirm around them or avoid them like the
plague as some do.

You read the words and wander off into some incomprehensible fantasy of
yours. That's archived by Google for a long time.

They seem to respond to some things as if they are in real danger at
times, or they get that feeling more often than I think they should,
but then again, I am not aware of anyone who is actively terrorizing
them.

You don't need to be, if they are.

Maybe so. Doesn't seem like there is much I can do but observe most of
the time.

Maybe you should try to actually be accurate, once in a while.

You telling me to be accurate? Why don't you do some research and try to
conform to the principles of the USA instead of avoiding them?

Been there, done that...you're still a raving crackpot.

Oh, well. You still doing it I assume, right?

I'm still defending my country from morons like you.

You defend the USA from Constitutionalists?

You're not a constitutionalist. You're a crackheaded whackjob who can't
figure out how to get through an open door, more often than not.

I find it quite odd that they would want so much tolerance of their
agendas in the face of so much opposition.

...which, for some reason, mostly seems to exist only in that
shredded imagination of yours.

Really?

"so much opposition"...in your opinion?

So, the next group of gays they get killed at a gay pride 'riot' parade
are you gonna claim bigotry and ignore the riot that caused the damages?

I'm sorry for Furman's image being slimed by your association with them.

Furman's image is slimed by Gay Pride Parades which incite riots?

Furman's image is not being helped by your insanity being posted under
their name. (Dance all you want to, but furman.edu is part of your e-mail
address. They'll get around to asking you to find somewhere else to abuse,
sooner or later.)

Somewhere else to abuse? I am not abusing their system. It is a forwarding
address. Emails do not go to a mailbox with that address attached to it.

You're posting your insanity with "furman.edu" attached to it. Have fun when
that bit of reality is used to clobber you.

[...]

Seems to me they would give up on the very things that causes them to
be in jeopardy.

You're not them, so you don't get to decide what they should do.

So, what next? Increased security at Gay Pride Parades?

No problem, here - HPD enters a float every year in our Pride Parade.

What sort of Pride Parade?

What the ***** do you think? It's Gay Pride.

Wow. I wonder just how much the people trust HPD then?

More so than they'd trust you.

Meaning gay's trust the HPD more than straights? LOL!

Meaning you're delusional (and stupid), as always.

Why do you even open your mouth with such statements?

If you can't handle me pointing out inconvenient facts, what's keeping you
from filtering me out?

Are you trying to mar their reputation firther?

No more than you're trying to be sane.

They could tell you to stop doing that.

You could act like a normal person. (That's about as likely as two blue moons
in one month.)

I know real quick when someone chooses favorites what kind of people they
are. Are you telling me that the HPD is now a gay defending, anti-straight,
abortionistic security patrol in Houston?

I'm telling you you're a delusional idiot, as far as I'm concerned. HPD
doesn't obey your fantasies, either.

Good thing you told us. Maybe there will be some emigration from Enron
addled Houston soon.

Maybe you're smoking crack again...since Enron was five years ago, and
Houston has more people here now than then. Sorry to poke a hole in that
dream of yours, but such is reality.

Well, you can go the way of New Orleans and wait on another Hurricane.
Do you think I am going to lose any rest because of that?
LOL!

Considering you got dumped on by three storms in 2004, we'll see what happens
next time Anderson gets hammered.

Maybe the NASD will send me enough cash so normal people can have a safe
place to live.

Maybe they'll send you back to the Home.

They have no authority to fulfill your anti-liberty fantasies.
Your fantasy there is illegal.

So call HPD and report me, if you believe that.
[...]

When it says women on the door you are supposed to be a woman. If you
can not comply with that, then why are you bitching like the bitches
those who ***** are?

Could you be bothered to explain what the hell you're trying to say, for
once?

Do you think those queenieboy types can act like men so people will treat
them like men?

Do you think APD appreciates having to keep an eye on you because of your
hatred of homosexuals?

What hatred? Can't you understand that I am being objective? See?

You? Objective? Now *that's* goddamned funny, coming from you. The only
thing you understand, from your ravings, is that everyone should obey you.
Try enforcing your delusions on anyone else and see how long it takes for your
obituary to appear.

One of your faults is you hinge on one or two statements another person made
far in the past, and it hurts your mind. Your reluctance to grow by being so
self-deceived is quite obvious.

I outgrew your emotional age a bit more than four decades ago.

Consider that at the average Pride parade in this decade, about 145,000
or so heterosexuals are in attendance along the 8000-foot parade route,
enjoying a mile and a half long block party for a couple of hours on a
summer Saturday night along the road that used to lead to Max
Westheimer's farm way out in the western wilderness, back when the city
extended all of two miles away from downtown.

I am not saying that it happens in every city, but there has been
demonstrated violence and riotous situations already in at least two
towns already.

So what? Two towns in 30-odd years...that's a safer record than you'll
ever be able to boast.

Two towns within two years is more the case.

Pride parades have been happening for 30-odd years, moron. Are you upset
because you didn't get to provoke a riot?

Your refusal to notice two occurrences within two years, huh?

So, where are these two alleged occurrences, which years, and what's your
source? (In the unlikely event you actually provide any of that, I suspect it
won't quite be as factual as you want the rest of us to believe it is.)

Just like the abortionists who like to spread all abortions amongst the
entire female population.

If you hadn't eaten the chocolate acid, you wouldn't have come up with that
delusion.

Liars are so descpicable. They look for ways to slide the blame amongst the
innocents/non-participants.

So why aren't you flogging yourself for being such an incoherent liar?
[...]

Ergo, the reference to the criminals in society.

Ergo, you're AWOL from the Home yet again.

The Home?

You're obviously mentally ill enough to be under some doctor's care.

You are obviously an anti-liberty anti-freedom, unconstitutional idiot.

....and your word is worth how much? (A December 1923 Deutschmark is immensely
more valuable than your word.)

You recommned usurious, anti-liberty actions against law abiding citizens.

So call the cops. (They need a good laugh at times, too.)

That is quite unbecoming of you. Where are your credentials to make all
these medical determinations you so routinely hurl online?

If you don't like my opinion, shove your head back up your ***** and don't read
what I post.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
User: "John D.Wentzky"

Title: Re: BYE IDIOTS! 19 Aug 2006 06:21:36 PM
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksljspsiv.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr6zdd70b.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpseyf8wl.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyfudcwm.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk64grdk0w.fsf@fnord.io.com...

"John D.Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:


[...]


part of government interference comes from such things. Part of
the
problem is the fear they live in now after 9/11 and such things;
which causes them to strike out at anything they perceive to
themselves as a threat to their security.


If you mean that, you're admitting to being truly paranoid.


Me paranoid? Is that why I don't like lying to the public?


Let's see...claiming you run stings on cops,


What I typed wasn't some official organization practice. You got to be
kidding if you think I am against cops. per se.


You're against anything that doesn't agree with your proclamations
from
on high.


Does that mean anything that doesn't align with the Constitution?


Learn to read for context, and you'll have your answer.


I did. Will you learn to do as you tell others to do?