Science > Abortion > California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage.
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Johnny" |
| Date: |
04 Sep 2005 09:43:35 AM |
| Object: |
California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
.
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 03:21:03 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can manage to
follow that complex set of instructions?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 07:45:13 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gh9e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can manage
to
follow that complex set of instructions?
You think that is complex?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 09:31:00 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gh9e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can manage to
follow that complex set of instructions?
You think that is complex?
Given your insanity, figuring out how to go through an open door is a major
task.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
07 Sep 2005 01:02:08 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gh9e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can manage
to
follow that complex set of instructions?
You think that is complex?
While I usually find ad-hominems to be a foil that shows that the
debate has turned from the argument to the arguers, theres little
actually argued. Either Johnny is a particulary persistant troll, or he
is truely astoundingly stupid; The responses illustrated here by our
lofty defender of heterosexual marriage seem to indicate some
psychological defect that renders him incapable of reading in context
or perceiving sarcasm.
I certainly hope Johnny is a troll having a good chuckle posing as a
lobotomised wingnut bigot, because its truely depressing to actually
meet anyone that is so utterly devoid of intellectual fortitude that
they find it the height of wit to respond to sarcasm as if its genuine,
with obtuse one line constructs that convey vast empty spaces where
thought should be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
07 Sep 2005 01:07:48 AM |
|
|
<dezakin@usa.net> wrote in message
news:1126069496.512774.56220@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gh9e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marri
age_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can
manage
to
follow that complex set of instructions?
You think that is complex?
While I usually find ad-hominems to be a foil that shows that the
debate has turned from the argument to the arguers, theres little
actually argued. Either Johnny is a particulary persistant troll, or he
is truely astoundingly stupid; The responses illustrated here by our
lofty defender of heterosexual marriage seem to indicate some
psychological defect that renders him incapable of reading in context
or perceiving sarcasm.
I certainly hope Johnny is a troll having a good chuckle posing as a
lobotomised wingnut bigot, because its truely depressing to actually
meet anyone that is so utterly devoid of intellectual fortitude that
they find it the height of wit to respond to sarcasm as if its genuine,
with obtuse one line constructs that convey vast empty spaces where
thought should be.
You must be new around here....
With Johnny, what you see is what you get. He is not a troll, but is as
stupid as he appears.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
-Mr. Worf, set phasers on "***** You" and fire at will. -Doc Smartass
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
07 Sep 2005 01:49:25 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gh9e8.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
So don't move to California and get married there. Think you can manage
to
follow that complex set of instructions?
You think that is complex?
While I usually find ad-hominems to be a foil that shows that the
debate has turned from the argument to the arguers, theres little
actually argued. Either Johnny is a particulary persistant troll, or he
is truely astoundingly stupid;
Remember, there is absolutely nothing that prevents him from being
both. Stupidity is something that is limitless is supply and limitless
in malleability. It can change its form to suit any situation, and it
never seems to lessen, much less run out. Heck, our current government
runs on stupidity, as can be seen by the Repugnican policies and
responses to troubles and types of crisis.
The responses illustrated here by our
lofty defender of heterosexual marriage seem to indicate some
psychological defect that renders him incapable of reading in context
or perceiving sarcasm.
I certainly hope Johnny is a troll having a good chuckle posing as a
lobotomised wingnut bigot, because its truely depressing to actually
meet anyone that is so utterly devoid of intellectual fortitude that
they find it the height of wit to respond to sarcasm as if its genuine,
with obtuse one line constructs that convey vast empty spaces where
thought should be.
Unfortunately, I think that your description of what he poses as is too
accurate as being what he is. He has too much of a history to think
much else.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 01:40:47 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 07:44:48 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
21-15 is enough votes in a state as large as California of some 30,000,000
people?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 09:30:09 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
21-15 is enough votes in a state as large as California of some 30,000,000
people?
If the state constitution says it's legal, you have no recourse (other than to
keep whining). Remember, you have no say in California. Can you guess why?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 10:41:56 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gxn4e.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
21-15 is enough votes in a state as large as California of some 30,000,000
people?
If the state constitution says it's legal, you have no recourse (other
than to
keep whining). Remember, you have no say in California.
You have a say there?
Can you guess why?
I am not a registered voter in California.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
05 Sep 2005 12:31:06 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvf1gxn4e.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
21-15 is enough votes in a state as large as California of some 30,000,000
people?
If the state constitution says it's legal, you have no recourse (other than
to keep whining). Remember, you have no say in California.
You have a say there?
No more than you do, for the same reason.
Can you guess why?
I am not a registered voter in California.
35 million Californians are doubtless thankful for that small favor.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
05 Sep 2005 12:10:19 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
21-15 is enough votes in a state as large as California of some 30,000,000
people?
For a straight vote, and not an amendment, yes. In fact, 19 - 17 is
enough. That is the way a representative government works. In the
U.S. Senate, a 51 - 50 vote (including the VP tie breaker) is enough
for a country of almost 300,000,000 people.
Try learning something about how the government works, and stop whining
because more intelligent people are working to do the jobs that they
were elected to do.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 07:44:03 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
They failed to represent the voters.
The voters are against this legislative action.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 08:15:03 PM |
|
|
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
They failed to represent the voters.
The voters are against this legislative action.
The ravings of an insane bigot are not the will of the voters.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 08:52:56 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dfg66n$7at$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
They failed to represent the voters.
The voters are against this legislative action.
The ravings of an insane bigot are not the will of the voters.
Tell that to the 21 senators who voted against their constituents.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
05 Sep 2005 12:15:30 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:dfg66n$7at$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
They failed to represent the voters.
The voters are against this legislative action.
The ravings of an insane bigot are not the will of the voters.
Tell that to the 21 senators who voted against their constituents.
Why don't you ask their constituents? (Remember, you have no say in anything
decided in California.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
05 Sep 2005 12:05:27 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1125859247.141075.311220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
And where do you see that? The Senate is ELECTED by the PEOPLE to
REPRESENT them. They were doing the job that they were hired/elected
to do. And that is representing ALL the people, and making sure that
ALL the people have their rights protected and ALL of them have the
same rights and same options.
Since the Senate represents the people, it votes for them as it is
supposed to do. The only reason that you are grousing is because they
did their jobs and you don't like the results.
They failed to represent the voters.
The voters are against this legislative action.
And why do you say that? Is it because you disagree with how they
voted?
Then you must think the same thing about the California House vote on
the same issue, since they did not represent the will of the voters
that are for equal rights, which you seem to find so deplorable.
By the way, equal rights should never be put up to popular vote. If
everyone has equal rights, then the same rights should be guaranteed
to everyone no matter what the popular opinion is. If rights are
subject to vote and opinion as to who has them and who does not, then
the rights are not equal. The California Senate did the right thing by
upholding equal rights for everyone.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 09:58:21 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Insert good reason here:
______________________________________________
(take more space as you need it).
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 11:38:38 AM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marria
ge_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
2.) Those that just love John Wentsky and want him to stay here, vote "no."
This is not a vote of 'right' or 'wrong.' It is merely a determination of
what people want. Nevermind such trivialties such as 'equality,' 'First
Amendment,' etc. It is merely what *you* (the voters) want.
We can only conclude that Putzky, in his neverending quest to affirm 'more
votes' over right and wrong, will immediately follow his own criteria and do
as the newsgroup community states.
Pay attention Putzky....we all know how the vote will go, and you'll have
some ***** reason why you 'usurp' the vote of the people and don't *****
off as instructed.
Let the voting begin.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
-Mr. Worf, set phasers on "***** You" and fire at will. -Doc Smartass
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 11:10:18 PM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marria
ge_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
2.) Those that just love John Wentsky and want him to stay here, vote "no."
This is not a vote of 'right' or 'wrong.' It is merely a determination of
what people want. Nevermind such trivialties such as 'equality,' 'First
Amendment,' etc. It is merely what *you* (the voters) want.
We can only conclude that Putzky, in his neverending quest to affirm 'more
votes' over right and wrong, will immediately follow his own criteria and do
as the newsgroup community states.
Pay attention Putzky....we all know how the vote will go, and you'll have
some ***** reason why you 'usurp' the vote of the people and don't *****
off as instructed.
Let the voting begin.
From Harris County 567: HELL, yes!
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 11:39:26 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in message
news:iCjTe.42036$Nx.36324@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marria
ge_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
My vote is, of course, "yes."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 11:49:50 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:39:26 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in message
news:iCjTe.42036$Nx.36324@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marria
ge_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
My vote is, of course, "yes."
Much as it would be gratifying, something tells me that Wentsky's not
going to see the parallel there...
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 11:11:58 PM |
|
|
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> writes:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:39:26 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in message
news:iCjTe.42036$Nx.36324@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
My vote is, of course, "yes."
Much as it would be gratifying, something tells me that Wentsky's not
going to see the parallel there...
Ya think? ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Vote now--->> was Re: California Senate usurped the peoples'vote on marriage. |
06 Sep 2005 04:24:58 PM |
|
|
Adam H. wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:39:26 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yahooX.com> wrote in message
news:iCjTe.42036$Nx.36324@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marria
ge_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh? Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
Let's use Putzky's logic and have a vote:
1.) Those that believe John Wentsky should ***** and leave these
newsgroups, never to return, vote "yes."
My vote is, of course, "yes."
Much as it would be gratifying, something tells me that Wentsky's not
going to see the parallel there...
Of course not. He'll start whining about rights or something. :))
FWIW, I vote a definite yes.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 09:59:57 AM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
I'm sure that you'd have claimed that southern senates usurped the
peoples' vote back in the day, huh?
When did Southern Senates usurp the people's vote?
Let's see if YOU can put forward a
good reason not to recognize SSM, shall we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 03:23:06 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
[...]
Let's see if YOU can put forward a good reason not to recognize SSM, shall
we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
Thanks for once again confirming that you're insane *and* stupid: it's
obviously Same Sex Marriage.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 07:43:15 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7c4h9at.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
[...]
Let's see if YOU can put forward a good reason not to recognize SSM,
shall
we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
Thanks for once again confirming that you're insane *and* stupid: it's
obviously Same Sex Marriage.
Because I went to school when they did not teach gay blade indoctrination I
am somehow despised for not adopting it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 09:28:30 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7c4h9at.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
[...]
Let's see if YOU can put forward a good reason not to recognize SSM,
shall we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
Thanks for once again confirming that you're insane *and* stupid: it's
obviously Same Sex Marriage.
Because I went to school when they did not teach gay blade indoctrination I
am somehow despised for not adopting it?
***** up a rope, SC Sod: I didn't get taught about "gay blade indoctrination"
in school, either, but unlike you, I didn't choose to be a blithering lunatic.
You picked your course, so shut up and deal with the consequences.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
04 Sep 2005 10:41:12 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmqsxn75.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7c4h9at.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
[...]
Let's see if YOU can put forward a good reason not to recognize SSM,
shall we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
Thanks for once again confirming that you're insane *and* stupid: it's
obviously Same Sex Marriage.
Because I went to school when they did not teach gay blade indoctrination
I
am somehow despised for not adopting it?
***** up a rope, SC Sod: I didn't get taught about "gay blade
indoctrination"
in school, either, but unlike you, I didn't choose to be a blithering
lunatic.
You picked your course, so shut up and deal with the consequences.
You earned how much respect then?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: California Senate usurped the peoples' vote on marriage. |
05 Sep 2005 12:29:58 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmqsxn75.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkr7c4h9at.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:6o2mh1p18nnhegovtc57tbgkio9c5fg5sm@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:43:35 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050902/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_7
[...]
Let's see if YOU can put forward a good reason not to recognize SSM,
shall we?
What is SSM supposed to be?
Thanks for once again confirming that you're insane *and* stupid: it's
obviously Same Sex Marriage.
Because I went to school when they did not teach gay blade indoctrination I
am somehow despised for not adopting it?
***** up a rope, SC Sod: I didn't get taught about "gay blade
indoctrination" in school, either, but unlike you, I didn't choose to be a
blithering lunatic. You picked your course, so shut up and deal with the
consequences.
You earned how much respect then?
More than you'll ever possess in what's left of the rest of your life.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
