| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"papa jack" |
| Date: |
10 Aug 2004 06:02:46 PM |
| Object: |
Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
On August 10, 2004, the Tucson Citizen (AP) posted an article titled:
"McCain, Others Oppose Challenge to Campaign Finance Law." Go to;
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
[...]
"The group wants to run commercials asking people to call
Wisconsin Sens. Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats,
urging them to oppose filibusters of President Bush's judi-
cial nominees. Because Feingold is running for re-election
this year, the group is barred from mentioning his name."
[...]
_______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
It seems so simple:
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
11 Aug 2004 11:46:56 AM |
|
|
papa jackass <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
_______________________________________________________________________
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
Why? You continually argue against freedom.
It seems so simple:
Amendment 13
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the United States
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "papa jack" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
11 Aug 2004 05:43:40 PM |
|
|
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote
in message news:<cfdihv$go4$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
papa jack <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
==========================================================================
Papa Jack remarks:
Over and over we see Ray using his childish "creative
deletions" and stupid comments to try to divert atten-
tion away from the point of an opponent's message.
I've used :: before the lines Ray deleted without any
attempt to show he made deletions. As anyone can
tell, Ray is trying to change the meaning of what I
posted in his usual sleazy way.
Next, I draw our readers attention to the simple fact
Ray's so-called comments do not make any sense and
have no relationship to what I wrote.
==========================================================================
:: On August 10, 2004, the Tucson Citizen (AP) posted an
:: article titled: "McCain, Others Oppose Challenge to
:: Campaign Finance Law." Go to;
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
::Excerpts:
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
::[...]
:: "The group wants to run commercials asking people to call
:: Wisconsin Sens. Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats,
:: urging them to oppose filibusters of President Bush's judi-
:: cial nominees. Because Feingold is running for re-election
:: this year, the group is barred from mentioning his name."
:: [...]
_______________________________________________________________________
:: Papa Jack comments:
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
==========================================================================
Ray Fischer wrote:
Why? You continually argue against freedom.
==========================================================================
:: Papa Jack wrote:
It seems so simple:
:: Amendment I
:: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
:: religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
:: the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."
==========================================================================
Ray Fischer wrote:
Amendment 13
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the United States
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
11 Aug 2004 05:52:42 PM |
|
|
(papa jack) wrote in
news:bd9f1f6b.0408111443.6e77d9bc@posting.google.com:
Over and over we see Ray using his childish "creative
deletions" and stupid comments to try to divert atten-
tion away from the point of an opponent's message.
what exactly is either creative or childish about ray pointing out your lies
and misrepresentations?
do you contend that *all* readers know you are lying and misrepresenting and,
for that reason, there is no need for ray to point it out?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
11 Aug 2004 11:52:12 PM |
|
|
papa jackass <papajack37@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote
Over and over we see Ray using his childish "creative
deletions" and stupid comments to try to divert atten-
Smirk. I see that Jackass is using creative editing and
outright lies in order to distract from the truth. And as
usual, Jackass tries to blame anybody but the one person most
guilty.
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
Why? You continually argue against freedom.
It seems so simple:
Amendment 13
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall
exist within the United States
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "papa jack" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
12 Aug 2004 07:28:12 PM |
|
|
On August 10, 2004, the Tucson Citizen (AP) posted an article titled:
"McCain, Others Oppose Challenge to Campaign Finance Law." Go to;
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
[...]
"The group wants to run commercials asking people to call
Wisconsin Sens. Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats,
urging them to oppose filibusters of President Bush's judi-
cial nominees. Because Feingold is running for re-election
this year, the group is barred from mentioning his name."
[...]
_______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
It seems so simple:
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."
.
|
|
|
| User: "pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
13 Aug 2004 07:24:23 AM |
|
|
(papa jack) wrote in message news:<bd9f1f6b.0408121628.4d5e112e@posting.google.com>...
On August 10, 2004, the Tucson Citizen (AP) posted an article titled:
"McCain, Others Oppose Challenge to Campaign Finance Law." Go to;
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
[...]
"The group wants to run commercials asking people to call
Wisconsin Sens. Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats,
urging them to oppose filibusters of President Bush's judi-
cial nominees. Because Feingold is running for re-election
this year, the group is barred from mentioning his name."
[...]
_______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
I see the only time you're interested in what the Constitution says is
when you feel that YOUR rights, or the rights of those people you
AGREE with, have been infringed upon.
"It is always to be taken for granted, that those who oppose an
equality of rights never mean the exclusion should take place on
themselves."
-- Thomas Paine
It seems so simple:
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: Campaign Finance Law Challenge |
12 Aug 2004 11:26:53 PM |
|
|
In article <bd9f1f6b.0408121628.4d5e112e@posting.google.com>,
(papa jack) wrote:
On August 10, 2004, the Tucson Citizen (AP) posted an article titled:
"McCain, Others Oppose Challenge to Campaign Finance Law." Go to;
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/breaking/081004_campaign_finance.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Excerpts:
"Sen. John McCain and other sponsors of the McCain-Feingold
campaign finance law are asking a federal court to deny a
Wisconsin anti-abortion group's challenge to the law.
"At issue is a provision in the law that prohibits interest
groups from running corporate-funded radio and TV advertise-
ments that mention a candidate's name within 30 days of a
primary or 60 days of a general election.
[...]
"The group wants to run commercials asking people to call
Wisconsin Sens. Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both Democrats,
urging them to oppose filibusters of President Bush's judi-
cial nominees. Because Feingold is running for re-election
this year, the group is barred from mentioning his name."
[...]
_______________________________________________________________________
Papa Jack comments:
I know the USSC has already ruled on this law, but it's still
difficult to believe it's constitutional to censor freedom of
speech in this crude manner.
It seems so simple:
Amendment I
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press;..."
Life is seldom simple. If life was so simple, the FCC would not
exist, or at least it would not have the power it has today.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
