| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
13 Apr 2006 11:27:02 PM |
| Object: |
Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49714
Peace Mom rips 'smear machine,' defends lack of marker for Casey
Cindy Sheehan, the anti-Bush activist dubbed the "Peace Mom" for her efforts
to stop the war in Iraq is lashing back at detractors who decry her lack of
a tombstone for her son, Casey Sheehan, who was killed Cindy Sheehan lies
above her son's markerless grave in Vanity Fair's January 2006 issue in the
conflict two years ago.
"I am so tired of the Rovian, heartless, and ignorant smear machine
attacking me and my family at every turn of my back," Sheehan writes in an
online commentary.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
17 Apr 2006 04:30:21 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-14CBDA.16344014042006@individual.net...
In article
<5ce8a$443f2ac7$45035f0d$25514@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote:
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
certainly that would be far better then to slam the grieving mother,
as you so often have done.
I have to disagree, James. Grieving can be done with dignity and
responsible behavior, as has been demonstrated by too many grieving family
members over the years, in this war and others. I believe she gave up
honoring her brave son, and gave up her dignity, when she became a
self-indulgent media *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
17 Apr 2006 08:10:07 AM |
|
|
In article <2aadnaBtqIICwt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"The Pervert" <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-14CBDA.16344014042006@individual.net...
In article
<5ce8a$443f2ac7$45035f0d$25514@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote:
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
certainly that would be far better then to slam the grieving mother,
as you so often have done.
I have to disagree, James. Grieving can be done with dignity and
responsible behavior, as has been demonstrated by too many grieving family
members over the years, in this war and others. I believe she gave up
honoring her brave son, and gave up her dignity, when she became a
self-indulgent media *****.
i think you've let your irrational political beliefs taint your
humanity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
17 Apr 2006 11:34:03 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-DA4797.09100717042006@individual.net...
In article <2aadnaBtqIICwt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"The Pervert" <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-14CBDA.16344014042006@individual.net...
In article
<5ce8a$443f2ac7$45035f0d$25514@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote:
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen
soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
certainly that would be far better then to slam the grieving mother,
as you so often have done.
I have to disagree, James. Grieving can be done with dignity and
responsible behavior, as has been demonstrated by too many grieving
family
members over the years, in this war and others. I believe she gave up
honoring her brave son, and gave up her dignity, when she became a
self-indulgent media *****.
i think you've let your irrational political beliefs taint your
humanity.
Since you don't know my political beliefs, rational or irrational, I have to
conclude that you've let your ignorance and prejudice overpower your
reasoning skills.
Sorry to have wasted my time and yours with a rational idea that dared
differ with your closed alleged mind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
17 Apr 2006 05:11:07 PM |
|
|
In article <9dKdnSdSqbFzX97ZnZ2dnUVZ_tednZ2d@comcast.com>,
"The Pervert" <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-DA4797.09100717042006@individual.net...
In article <2aadnaBtqIICwt7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"The Pervert" <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jgkeegan-14CBDA.16344014042006@individual.net...
In article
<5ce8a$443f2ac7$45035f0d$25514@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote:
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of
fallensoldiers is for their mothers to act like total
nut-jobs?
certainly that would be far better then to slam the grieving mother,
as you so often have done.
I have to disagree, James. Grieving can be done with dignity
and responsible behavior, as has been demonstrated by too many
grieving family members over the years, in this war and
others. I believe she gave up honoring her brave son, and
gave up her dignity, when she became a self-indulgent media
*****.
i think you've let your irrational political beliefs taint your
humanity.
Since you don't know my political beliefs,
of course i do!! i know them through reading your posts.
rational or irrational, I have to
conclude that you've let your ignorance and prejudice overpower your
reasoning skills.
that's exactly what you just did: again!
Sorry
as you should be.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hc23hc" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
17 Apr 2006 11:38:11 AM |
|
|
james g. keegan wrote:
< The Pervert, war criminal, wrote:
Grieving can be done with dignity and responsible behavior,
as has been demonstrated by too many grieving family
members over the years, in this war and others.
The Pervert's idea of grieving is to killfile anyone who reminds him
about the mass murders he has bragged of having committed as a dyed in
the wool war criminal.
I believe she gave up honoring her brave son, and gave up
her dignity, when she became a self-indulgent media *****.
i think you've let your irrational political beliefs taint your
humanity.
Not so fast. The Pervert knows far more about whores than Cindy
Sheehan ever will. However, if The Pervert had any humanity to begin
with, your courteous assessment of him would be more or less correct.
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hc23hc" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 01:20:42 AM |
|
|
Stain de STD, Fascist Volltrottel, wrote:
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of
fallen soldiers is for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Stain, the President whom you run interference for is a total nut-job.
Your mother, for not aborting you, is a total nut-job. The name Stain
de STD is synonymous with political Cashew Nuts and spoiled Trailer
Park Mix. Your favorite airline serves you hearty meals consisting
exclusively of honey-roast peanuts, and yet still it makes you gain
weight. You don't have any friends, and the closest thing you could
describe as such are nuts, ranging from closet soft-shell genital
nut-lice to hardcore Wal-Mart-Nuts.
But, even taking all of this into account to mitigate your repulsive
character and dreadful behavior, next to Cindy Sheehan, Stain, you're a
total vegetable.
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Weatherlawyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 02:36:08 AM |
|
|
hc23hc wrote:
But, even taking all of this into account to mitigate your repulsive
character and dreadful behavior, next to Cindy Sheehan, Stain, you're a
total vegetable.
What sort of a vegetable might that be? A nut perchance?
Q: How would you be able to tell him from a potus turd?
A: The Kernels eventually turd up.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 12:00:39 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2419$0$15311$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Are you suggesting that you knew Casey Sheehan better than his own mother?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 05:34:07 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2af1$0$15333$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2419$0$15311$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Are you suggesting that you knew Casey Sheehan better than his own mother?
Are you suggesting that you knew either Casey or Cindy better than the rest
of her family, who have chosen to deliberately distance themselves from her
antics?
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 07:42:38 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2af1$0$15333$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2419$0$15311$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Are you suggesting that you knew Casey Sheehan better than his own mother?
Are you suggesting that you knew either Casey or Cindy better than the rest
of her family, who have chosen to deliberately distance themselves from her
antics?
And your evidence for this assertion is... what?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Winston Smith, American Patriot" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 12:15:29 AM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2419$0$15311$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take
her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen
soldiers is for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Are you suggesting that you knew Casey Sheehan better than his own
mother?
Being a card-carrying Swift Boat Lying Scum means that one has certain
obligations, and one of these is for the poster to whom you are addressing
to say the most outrageous things about even Gold Star Moms.
--
http://hume.realisticpolitics.com/
Estimate the worth of a man by how sincerely he greets you.
Arrive at the worth of a man by how he opens himself to you.
Know the worth of a man by how conscientiously he listens to you.
Verify the worth of a man by how warmly he takes his leave of you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 10:13:17 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:443f2419$0$15311$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country and deserves all the honors this nation
can afford to one who has done so. A proper headstone seems the very
least that we can do for him. I am, personally, appalled at how both
sides have used his death to forward their political agendas while
ignoring the ultimate service that one can give.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 03:21:12 PM |
|
|
If she wants a monument to her son she could make it from the large
chip on her shoulder..
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 09:39:01 PM |
|
|
George wrote:
If she wants a monument to her son she could make it from the large
chip on her shoulder..
She has the perfect right to have as large a chip on her shoulder as she
wants.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 12:02:54 AM |
|
|
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:04:35 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:10:14 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Would you prefer chronological or alphabetical? Or do you want them one
at a time?
Here's one to get you started:
"The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did Saddam
Hussein have a weapons program? And the answer is, absolutely. And we
gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them
in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him
from power, along with other nations, so as to make sure he was not a
threat to the United States and our friends and allies in the region."
--Bush, July 14, 2003.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-3.html
--versus--
"In the clearest sign yet that war with Iraq is imminent, the United
States has advised U.N. weapons inspectors to begin pulling out of
Baghdad, the U.N. nuclear agency chief said Monday."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-17-inspectors-iraq_x.htm
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 03:28:25 PM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44409acf$0$15450$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Would you prefer chronological or alphabetical? Or do you want them one
at a time?
Here's one to get you started:
"The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did Saddam
Hussein have a weapons program? And the answer is, absolutely. And we
gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them
in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him
from power, along with other nations, so as to make sure he was not a
threat to the United States and our friends and allies in the region."
--Bush, July 14, 2003.
Lying means making a statement that you know for a fact is not true. If you
think Bush lied, tell us if Clinton, Kerry, Gore, Madeline Albright, and the
leaders of several European nations lied as well, since they said the same
thing. Tell us why a lot of Iraqi generals also happened to believe they had
WMDs as well. Let's see if we get an honest answer out of you, or if you do
the usual game-playing that lefties do when they can't back up their own
claims. :O|
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
18 Apr 2006 08:16:53 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44409acf$0$15450$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Would you prefer chronological or alphabetical? Or do you want them one
at a time?
Here's one to get you started:
"The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did Saddam
Hussein have a weapons program? And the answer is, absolutely. And we
gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them
in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him
from power, along with other nations, so as to make sure he was not a
threat to the United States and our friends and allies in the region."
--Bush, July 14, 2003.
Lying means making a statement that you know for a fact is not true.
Yes. Bush knew, while he was making the above quote that he was saying
something that was, in fact, not true. And the evidence for that is
what you cowardly snipped.
Here it is again:
"In the clearest sign yet that war with Iraq is imminent, the United
States has advised U.N. weapons inspectors to begin pulling out of
Baghdad, the U.N. nuclear agency chief said Monday."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-17-inspectors-iraq_x.htm
Note the date... 4 months between the time that the US told the weapons
inspectors to clear out and the speech that says that the weapons
inspectors were not allowed in.
If you
think Bush lied, tell us if Clinton, Kerry, Gore, Madeline Albright, and the
leaders of several European nations lied as well, since they said the same
thing.
Cite? Oh, and don't bother giving me the oft-debunked "quotes" from
these guys that were made prior to 1998 or after 2001.
Tell us why a lot of Iraqi generals also happened to believe they had
WMDs as well.
Cite?
Let's see if we get an honest answer out of you, or if you do
the usual game-playing that lefties do when they can't back up their own
claims. :O|
As soon as you back up your claims.... Or will I get the usual
game-playing that righties do when they can't back up their own claims?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
19 Apr 2006 10:59:52 PM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4444e539$0$15331$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
If you
think Bush lied, tell us if Clinton, Kerry, Gore, Madeline Albright, and
the
leaders of several European nations lied as well, since they said the
same
thing.
Cite? Oh, and don't bother giving me the oft-debunked "quotes" from
these guys that were made prior to 1998 or after 2001.
How were they "debunked"? Did the aforementioned Democratic politicians NOT
make those statements?
Tell us why a lot of Iraqi generals also happened to believe they had
WMDs as well.
Cite?
Here you are:
Kay: Iraqi Generals Believed Iraq Had WMD
Human Events, Feb 9, 2004 by Sessions, Jeff, Kay, David, Collins, Susan
It has been widely reported that outgoing Iraq Survey Group Director David
Kay told the Senate Armed Services Committee on January 28 that "we were
almost all wrong." It has not been widely reported that Kay said that even
Iraqi Republican Guard generals believed Iraq had weapons of mass
destruction. Kay did not even rule out that Saddam himself might have
believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Here are the pertinent
excerpts from this testimony:
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R.-Ala.): I believe at one point you noted that even his
own military officers believed they had them [WMD]. In other words, they
Would think-
David Kay:-that someone else had them.
Sessions: Could you explain that?
Kay: Well, in interviewing the Republican Guard generals and Special
Republican Guard generals and asking about their capabilities and having
them, the assurance was they didn't personally have them and hadn't seen
them, but the units on their right or left had them. And as you worked the
way around the circle of those defending Baghdad, which is the immediate
area of concern, you have got this very strange phenomena of no, I don't
have them, I haven't seen them, but look to my right and left. That was an
intentional ambiguity.
And realize freedom of discussion and movement was not something encouraged
in Iraq. For example, Republican Guard divisions never entered into the city
limits of Baghdad. Only the SRG [Special Republican Guard] was allowed to.
You didn't even train in multidivisional units because of that issue of his
concern about them. It was a powerful deception technology. We have it
[WMD], but we haven't seen it, but we know that someone else has it.
Sessions: And it is true, I think no one can dispute, that had he not had
these weapons of mass destruction and had opened his country and plainly
demonstrated it, this war would have been avoided.
Kay: Yes, I think that's true. And that's one-always been one of the
mysteries for all of us to determine: how-why would he have run this risk
that cost him his regime and the death of members of his family if he didn't
have those weapons?
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200402/ai_n9385971
Let's see if we get an honest answer out of you, or if you do
the usual game-playing that lefties do when they can't back up their own
claims. :O|
As soon as you back up your claims.... Or will I get the usual
game-playing that righties do when they can't back up their own claims?
My claims are backed up - now it's your turn... :Oo
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
19 Apr 2006 11:53:13 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4444e539$0$15331$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
If you
think Bush lied, tell us if Clinton, Kerry, Gore, Madeline Albright, and
the
leaders of several European nations lied as well, since they said the
same
thing.
Cite? Oh, and don't bother giving me the oft-debunked "quotes" from
these guys that were made prior to 1998 or after 2001.
How were they "debunked"? Did the aforementioned Democratic politicians NOT
make those statements?
No. They most certainly made the statements.
Tell us why a lot of Iraqi generals also happened to believe they had
WMDs as well.
Cite?
Here you are:
Kay: Iraqi Generals Believed Iraq Had WMD
Human Events, Feb 9, 2004 by Sessions, Jeff, Kay, David, Collins, Susan
It has been widely reported that outgoing Iraq Survey Group Director David
Kay told the Senate Armed Services Committee on January 28 that "we were
almost all wrong." It has not been widely reported that Kay said that even
Iraqi Republican Guard generals believed Iraq had weapons of mass
destruction. Kay did not even rule out that Saddam himself might have
believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Here are the pertinent
excerpts from this testimony:
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R.-Ala.): I believe at one point you noted that even his
own military officers believed they had them [WMD]. In other words, they
Would think-
David Kay:-that someone else had them.
Sessions: Could you explain that?
Kay: Well, in interviewing the Republican Guard generals and Special
Republican Guard generals and asking about their capabilities and having
them, the assurance was they didn't personally have them and hadn't seen
them, but the units on their right or left had them. And as you worked the
way around the circle of those defending Baghdad, which is the immediate
area of concern, you have got this very strange phenomena of no, I don't
have them, I haven't seen them, but look to my right and left. That was an
intentional ambiguity.
And realize freedom of discussion and movement was not something encouraged
in Iraq. For example, Republican Guard divisions never entered into the city
limits of Baghdad. Only the SRG [Special Republican Guard] was allowed to.
You didn't even train in multidivisional units because of that issue of his
concern about them. It was a powerful deception technology. We have it
[WMD], but we haven't seen it, but we know that someone else has it.
Sessions: And it is true, I think no one can dispute, that had he not had
these weapons of mass destruction and had opened his country and plainly
demonstrated it, this war would have been avoided.
Kay: Yes, I think that's true. And that's one-always been one of the
mysteries for all of us to determine: how-why would he have run this risk
that cost him his regime and the death of members of his family if he didn't
have those weapons?
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200402/ai_n9385971
I see no evidence here that states that Iraq DID have them prior to our
invasion. But, yes, I concede that, within Iraq's own internal
governance, there was intense sophistry.
Let's see if we get an honest answer out of you, or if you do
the usual game-playing that lefties do when they can't back up their own
claims. :O|
As soon as you back up your claims.... Or will I get the usual
game-playing that righties do when they can't back up their own claims?
My claims are backed up - now it's your turn... :Oo
Easily. http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/
"Iraq Survey Group (ISG) discovered further evidence of the maturity and
significance of the pre-1991 Iraqi Nuclear Program but found that Iraq's
ability to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program progressively decayed
after that date."
"As with other WMD areas, Saddam's ambitions in the nuclear area were
secondary to his prime objective of ending UN sanctions."
"In practical terms, with the destruction of the Al Hakam facility, Iraq
abandoned its ambition to obtain advanced BW (biological warfare)
weapons quickly. ISG found no direct evidence that Iraq, after 1996, had
plans for a new BW program or was conducting BW-specific work for
military purposes."
Do you have something else of substance, Stan?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 10:11:09 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Whether Bush lied or not is irrelevant to the *FACT* that Casey died in
service to his country, not in service to his president or his mother.
Both of you (SD and Ray) should be ashamed of yourselves fort using his
death to shore up your arguments. SD didn't *YOU* serve your country?
Doesn't Casey deserve more respect than you using his death for
political points? I highly doubt that Ray has ever served anything
except maybe a big mac so his transgression is less egregious, he
doesn't and *CAN'T* understand the meaning of service and loyalty to his
country. Of course that doesn't excuse his using Casey's death either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 03:32:05 PM |
|
|
"Miriam Cohen" <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote in message
news:u280g.2298$iF3.356@dukeread01...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Whether Bush lied or not is irrelevant to the *FACT* that Casey died in
service to his country, not in service to his president or his mother.
Both of you (SD and Ray) should be ashamed of yourselves fort using his
death to shore up your arguments. SD didn't *YOU* serve your country?
Doesn't Casey deserve more respect than you using his death for
political points?
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me. My criticism
has been SPECIFICALLY about Cindy's pathetic, self-serving behavior, which
not only does NOTHING to honor the memory of her son, but has caused enough
embarrassment for her own husband to divorce her, and the rest of the family
to in essence tell her to STFU over this matter. How you came to that
conclusion is beyond me...
I highly doubt that Ray has ever served anything
except maybe a big mac so his transgression is less egregious, he
doesn't and *CAN'T* understand the meaning of service and loyalty to his
country. Of course that doesn't excuse his using Casey's death either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
18 Apr 2006 08:19:48 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"Miriam Cohen" <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote in message
news:u280g.2298$iF3.356@dukeread01...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Whether Bush lied or not is irrelevant to the *FACT* that Casey died in
service to his country, not in service to his president or his mother.
Both of you (SD and Ray) should be ashamed of yourselves fort using his
death to shore up your arguments. SD didn't *YOU* serve your country?
Doesn't Casey deserve more respect than you using his death for
political points?
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan. By saying that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and "dishonoring the memory of her son", failing to prove
that "the rest of the family" is telling her to "STFU over this matter."
As evidenced below:
My criticism
has been SPECIFICALLY about Cindy's pathetic, self-serving behavior, which
not only does NOTHING to honor the memory of her son, but has caused enough
embarrassment for her own husband to divorce her, and the rest of the family
to in essence tell her to STFU over this matter. How you came to that
conclusion is beyond me...
And how you came to the conclusion that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and the rest is beyond me as well.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
19 Apr 2006 11:03:05 PM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4444e5e5$0$15331$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Miriam Cohen" <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote in message
news:u280g.2298$iF3.356@dukeread01...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take
her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen
soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought
and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Whether Bush lied or not is irrelevant to the *FACT* that Casey died in
service to his country, not in service to his president or his mother.
Both of you (SD and Ray) should be ashamed of yourselves fort using his
death to shore up your arguments. SD didn't *YOU* serve your country?
Doesn't Casey deserve more respect than you using his death for
political points?
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
By saying that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and "dishonoring the memory of her son", failing to prove
that "the rest of the family" is telling her to "STFU over this matter."
As evidenced below:
My criticism
has been SPECIFICALLY about Cindy's pathetic, self-serving behavior,
which
not only does NOTHING to honor the memory of her son, but has caused
enough
embarrassment for her own husband to divorce her, and the rest of the
family
to in essence tell her to STFU over this matter. How you came to that
conclusion is beyond me...
And how you came to the conclusion that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and the rest is beyond me as well.
Then you obviously haven't noticed that she is a bit of an attention
*****... :O|
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
19 Apr 2006 11:56:48 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:4444e5e5$0$15331$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Miriam Cohen" <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote in message
news:u280g.2298$iF3.356@dukeread01...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44407e7e$0$1532$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
Miriam Cohen <mimiNOgalSPAM@cox.net> wrote:
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
youngopinions@aol.com wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take
her
tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
Have you ever lost a child in a war?
Are you suggesting that the way to honor the memory of fallen
soldiers
is
for their mothers to act like total nut-jobs?
Regardless of Ms Sheehan's actions or words her son, Casey, fought
and
died in service to his country
No, because of Bush's lies, he died in service to Iraq.
And what did Bush supposedly lie about?
Whether Bush lied or not is irrelevant to the *FACT* that Casey died in
service to his country, not in service to his president or his mother.
Both of you (SD and Ray) should be ashamed of yourselves fort using his
death to shore up your arguments. SD didn't *YOU* serve your country?
Doesn't Casey deserve more respect than you using his death for
political points?
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
I equate the criticism of war mothers with criticism of the troops and,
therefore, Casey.
By saying that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and "dishonoring the memory of her son", failing to prove
that "the rest of the family" is telling her to "STFU over this matter."
As evidenced below:
My criticism
has been SPECIFICALLY about Cindy's pathetic, self-serving behavior,
which
not only does NOTHING to honor the memory of her son, but has caused
enough
embarrassment for her own husband to divorce her, and the rest of the
family
to in essence tell her to STFU over this matter. How you came to that
conclusion is beyond me...
And how you came to the conclusion that she is "pathetic,"
"self-serving" and the rest is beyond me as well.
Then you obviously haven't noticed that she is a bit of an attention
*****... :O|
And...? If anyone that is an "attention *****" is "pathetic" and
"self-serving," then all celebrities, leading political leaders,
pundits, and anyone else that craves attention would then be "pathetic"
and "self-serving."
Thanks for admitting that Bush is pathetic. :-D
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
20 Apr 2006 05:43:42 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:444712fe$0$15318$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
I equate the criticism of war mothers with criticism of the troops and,
therefore, Casey.
You can equate it all you want, but it doesn't make it so. Casey was a
hero. Cindy dishonored her son. Criticism of Cindy has absolutely NOTHING
to do with her son or any of the troops. Criticism of Cindy deals with
(amazingly enough) Cindy. That's all. Any additions to that are of your
own creation and fabrication.
Then you obviously haven't noticed that she is a bit of an attention
*****... :O|
And...? If anyone that is an "attention *****" is "pathetic" and
"self-serving," then all celebrities, leading political leaders,
pundits, and anyone else that craves attention would then be "pathetic"
and "self-serving."
Some of them are.
Thanks for admitting that Bush is pathetic. :-D
He did no such thing. You're smarter and better than that... I thought. Am
I mistaken?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
21 Apr 2006 01:29:03 AM |
|
|
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:444712fe$0$15318$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
I equate the criticism of war mothers with criticism of the troops and,
therefore, Casey.
You can equate it all you want, but it doesn't make it so. Casey was a
hero. Cindy dishonored her son.
That you are intolerant of speech and a right-wing suckup doesn't make
her actions dishonorable.
Criticism of Cindy has absolutely NOTHING
to do with her son or any of the troops.
It has to do with the fact that you hate that she dares to embarass
your Glorious Leader.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
21 Apr 2006 12:30:17 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:44487baf$0$1496$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:444712fe$0$15318$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
I equate the criticism of war mothers with criticism of the troops and,
therefore, Casey.
You can equate it all you want, but it doesn't make it so. Casey was a
hero. Cindy dishonored her son.
That you are intolerant of speech and a right-wing suckup doesn't make
her actions dishonorable.
Criticism of Cindy has absolutely NOTHING
to do with her son or any of the troops.
It has to do with the fact that you hate that she dares to embarass
your Glorious Leader.
You've played that stupid dance before, thus proving yet again your
incredible stupidity and blatant dishonesty.
Will you never learn that you're too goddamned stupid to pull that crap off
successfully?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
21 Apr 2006 10:00:08 PM |
|
|
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
Where have I directed ANY disrespect towards Casey? Show me.
By criticizing Cindy Sheehan.
Not the same. Nice try, but a rather pathetic one...
I equate the criticism of war mothers with criticism of the troops and,
therefore, Casey.
You can equate it all you want, but it doesn't make it so. Casey was a
hero. Cindy dishonored her son.
That you are intolerant of speech and a right-wing suckup doesn't make
her actions dishonorable.
Criticism of Cindy has absolutely NOTHING
to do with her son or any of the troops.
It has to do with the fact that you hate that she dares to embarass
your Glorious Leader.
You've played that stupid dance before, thus proving yet again your
incredible stupidity and blatant dishonesty.
And yet here you are AGAIN attacking Cindy Sheehan in defense of the
Bush administration.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|