| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
13 Apr 2006 11:27:02 PM |
| Object: |
Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
tragically succumbed to an act of war. This windbag should take her tired
act back home and slip away into oblivion
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49714
Peace Mom rips 'smear machine,' defends lack of marker for Casey
Cindy Sheehan, the anti-Bush activist dubbed the "Peace Mom" for her efforts
to stop the war in Iraq is lashing back at detractors who decry her lack of
a tombstone for her son, Casey Sheehan, who was killed Cindy Sheehan lies
above her son's markerless grave in Vanity Fair's January 2006 issue in the
conflict two years ago.
"I am so tired of the Rovian, heartless, and ignorant smear machine
attacking me and my family at every turn of my back," Sheehan writes in an
online commentary.
--
----------
J Young
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 12:29:21 AM |
|
|
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 05:35:44 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes than
admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the memory of
her son.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 03:33:19 PM |
|
|
In article
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>,
"Stan de SD" <standesd_DIGA_NO_A_SPAM@covad.net> wrote:
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes than
admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the memory of
her son.
only a crazed neocon would criticize the grieving mother of a soldier
killed as the result of bush's lies rather than criticize the liar
himself.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 07:27:39 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 03:18:22 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others. If
criticism was akin to dictating, the typical left-winger would be the
equivalent of Hitler, Stalin, and Idi Amin all rolled into one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 04:58:01 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<33df4$44400300$45035f0d$30471@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to
uphold the memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others. If
criticism was akin to dictating, the typical left-winger would be the
equivalent of Hitler, Stalin, and Idi Amin all rolled into one.
Wow. What are you, a defective Perl script?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 09:38:27 PM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the military
have no right to criticize. But, if it's freedom of speech you're
trying to pull, then just remember, we, too, have the freedom of speech
to say that you are a dipshit *****.
HTH.
If
criticism was akin to dictating, the typical left-winger would be the
equivalent of Hitler, Stalin, and Idi Amin all rolled into one.
I see. Left-wingers are now responsible for the death of over 5 million
people because you don't like what we have to say. Gotcha. I invoke
Godwin.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 10:12:43 PM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44405b1c$0$15420$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here
embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the military
have no right to criticize.
We could just as easily say thay nobody who has ever served in the military
has a right to criticize, and that would of course rule out Cindy. I suspect
it would silence you as well. :O|
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 12:09:14 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44405b1c$0$15420$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here
embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the military
have no right to criticize.
We could just as easily say thay nobody who has ever served in the military
has a right to criticize,
"We" could, but "we" would be stupid. Simply serving in the military is
_NOT_ the same as losing your child in an immoral war.
and that would of course rule out Cindy. I suspect
it would silence you as well. :O|
I do not criticize the military, though. Nor do I criticize military
families. You, however, are.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stan de SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:07:43 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44407e73$0$15278$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44405b1c$0$15420$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here
embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the military
have no right to criticize.
We could just as easily say thay nobody who has ever served in the
military
has a right to criticize,
"We" could, but "we" would be stupid. Simply serving in the military is
_NOT_ the same as losing your child in an immoral war.
Your erroneous statement about an "immoral war" aside, you're now suggesting
that those who could potenitally die (i.e. those who have served) have less
rights to have opinions than their relatives?
and that would of course rule out Cindy. I suspect
it would silence you as well. :O|
I do not criticize the military, though. Nor do I criticize military
families. You, however, are.
I suppose you are stupid enough to believe that, but tell us what your take
is on the rest of the Sheehan family distancing themselves from Cindy...
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:20:04 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44407e73$0$15278$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44405b1c$0$15420$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here
embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the military
have no right to criticize.
We could just as easily say thay nobody who has ever served in the
military
has a right to criticize,
"We" could, but "we" would be stupid. Simply serving in the military is
_NOT_ the same as losing your child in an immoral war.
Your erroneous statement about an "immoral war" aside, you're now suggesting
that those who could potenitally die (i.e. those who have served) have less
rights to have opinions than their relatives?
Nope. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. They do not,
however, have the right to be critical unless their own position is similar.
and that would of course rule out Cindy. I suspect
it would silence you as well. :O|
I do not criticize the military, though. Nor do I criticize military
families. You, however, are.
I suppose you are stupid enough to believe that, but tell us what your take
is on the rest of the Sheehan family distancing themselves from Cindy...
Care to provide a cite from "the rest of the Sheehan family"? Please
provide URLs to relevant quotes with their names.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atom Bomb" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 03:40:58 AM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44409d1e$0$15411$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44407e73$0$15278$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44405b1c$0$15420$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of
their
loved ones since when?
Like most Lefty Liberals, you assume that commenting on here
embarrassing
and self-serving behavior is somehow akin to "dictating" to others.
Nah, we simply say that those that have never lost a son in the
military
have no right to criticize.
We could just as easily say thay nobody who has ever served in the
military
has a right to criticize,
"We" could, but "we" would be stupid. Simply serving in the military is
_NOT_ the same as losing your child in an immoral war.
Your erroneous statement about an "immoral war" aside, you're now
suggesting
that those who could potenitally die (i.e. those who have served) have
less
rights to have opinions than their relatives?
Nope. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. They do not, however,
have the right to be critical unless their own position is similar.
and that would of course rule out Cindy. I suspect
it would silence you as well. :O|
I do not criticize the military, though. Nor do I criticize military
families. You, however, are.
I suppose you are stupid enough to believe that, but tell us what your
take
is on the rest of the Sheehan family distancing themselves from Cindy...
Care to provide a cite from "the rest of the Sheehan family"? Please
provide URLs to relevant quotes with their names.
He's talking about the cowardly husband who divorced her because of the
rednecks on his job who saw her as a pariah rather than a brave Mother who
didn't want other Moms to suffer the anguish she had for Bush's 'base' of
thieving liars who saw Iraq an an opportunity to make a few dollars.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 11:21:37 AM |
|
|
Atom Bomb wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44409d1e$0$15411$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
Stan de SD wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44407e73$0$15278$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
<snip for brevity>
I do not criticize the military, though. Nor do I criticize military
families. You, however, are.
I suppose you are stupid enough to believe that, but tell us what your
take
is on the rest of the Sheehan family distancing themselves from Cindy...
Care to provide a cite from "the rest of the Sheehan family"? Please
provide URLs to relevant quotes with their names.
He's talking about the cowardly husband who divorced her because of the
rednecks on his job who saw her as a pariah rather than a brave Mother who
didn't want other Moms to suffer the anguish she had for Bush's 'base' of
thieving liars who saw Iraq an an opportunity to make a few dollars.
The "Sheehan family" is a great deal larger than just her ex-husband.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 04:30:18 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes
than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the
memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Who is dictating anything? Since when is only the radical left allowed to
comment on things they take issue with?
If you disagree with something, state the disagreement honestly. Gives you
more credibility. And you don't look like a jerk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 05:03:34 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<IcmdnTQeyoNajt3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to
uphold the memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Who is dictating anything?
You.
Since when is only the radical left allowed to
comment on things they take issue with?
"Radical left! Radical left! SQUAAAAWK! Polly wants a political campaign
donation!"
If you disagree with something, state the disagreement honestly. Gives
you more credibility. And you don't look like a jerk.
Why would I want credibility with a group whose agenda is imploding on
itself faster than you can say "Iraqi civil war?"
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 06:41:18 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:wKednS_XErWrgd3ZRVn-vw@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<IcmdnTQeyoNajt3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to
uphold the memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of their
loved ones since when?
Who is dictating anything?
You.
Oh really? Are you and idiot or simply reading comp challenged. Quote
where I am dictating anything to or about anything.
Since when is only the radical left allowed to
comment on things they take issue with?
"Radical left! Radical left! SQUAAAAWK! Polly wants a political campaign
donation!"
Have I asked for any political donations? No. So are you making up silly
***** that isn't the truth? Yes. Do you enjoy lying and being a jerk?
Apparently. You do it so well and so often.
If you disagree with something, state the disagreement honestly. Gives
you more credibility. And you don't look like a jerk.
Why would I want credibility with a group whose agenda is imploding on
itself faster than you can say "Iraqi civil war?"
Oh really? What's my "agenda?" You're responding to my post, so back up
your *****. Quotes only, of course. Your dishionest misinterpretations
don't count.
I have often said that the Iraq War was a huge mistake and have called it a
cluster *****.
And if you want no credibility, why do you even bother posting if your posts
have nothing to do with reality? Is looking like a jerk your only goal?
Can you really be as stupid as the posts your write? Can anybody?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 07:38:12 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<a46dnTjG8c7ir93ZRVn-sg@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:wKednS_XErWrgd3ZRVn-vw@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<IcmdnTQeyoNajt3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to
object to wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing
to uphold the memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of
their loved ones since when?
Who is dictating anything?
You.
Oh really? Are you and idiot or simply reading comp challenged. Quote
where I am dictating anything to or about anything.
Okay, you're right about that. You jumped in to respond to something I
wrote to someone else and mistook you for them.
So sue me.
Since when is only the radical left allowed to comment on things they
take issue with?
"Radical left! Radical left! SQUAAAAWK! Polly wants a political campaign
donation!"
Have I asked for any political donations? No. So are you making up silly
***** that isn't the truth? Yes. Do you enjoy lying and being a jerk?
Apparently. You do it so well and so often.
If you disagree with something, state the disagreement honestly.
Gives you more credibility. And you don't look like a jerk.
Why would I want credibility with a group whose agenda is imploding on
itself faster than you can say "Iraqi civil war?"
Oh really? What's my "agenda?" You're responding to my post, so back up
your *****. Quotes only, of course. Your dishionest
misinterpretations don't count.
I have often said that the Iraq War was a huge mistake and have called it
a cluster *****.
And if you want no credibility, why do you even bother posting if your
posts have nothing to do with reality? Is looking like a jerk your only
goal?
Can you really be as stupid as the posts your write? Can anybody?
Do you really take Usenet so seriously as *this? You sound like you're
about to burst a blood vessel.
Maybe you should talk to someone...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:50:45 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:3JedneFgHujp3d3ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<a46dnTjG8c7ir93ZRVn-sg@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:wKednS_XErWrgd3ZRVn-vw@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<IcmdnTQeyoNajt3ZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:lNGdnQQhoMGmCKLZ4p2dnA@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Stan de SD in episode
<e53e0$443f7a73$45035f0d$26968@msgid.meganewsservers.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to
object to wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical
platitudes than admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing
to uphold the memory of her son.
And you have the right to dictate how people honor the memory of
their loved ones since when?
Who is dictating anything?
You.
Oh really? Are you and idiot or simply reading comp challenged. Quote
where I am dictating anything to or about anything.
Okay, you're right about that. You jumped in to respond to something I
wrote to someone else and mistook you for them.
So sue me.
Since when is only the radical left allowed to comment on things they
take issue with?
"Radical left! Radical left! SQUAAAAWK! Polly wants a political
campaign
donation!"
Have I asked for any political donations? No. So are you making up
silly
***** that isn't the truth? Yes. Do you enjoy lying and being a
jerk?
Apparently. You do it so well and so often.
If you disagree with something, state the disagreement honestly.
Gives you more credibility. And you don't look like a jerk.
Why would I want credibility with a group whose agenda is imploding on
itself faster than you can say "Iraqi civil war?"
Oh really? What's my "agenda?" You're responding to my post, so back
up
your *****. Quotes only, of course. Your dishionest
misinterpretations don't count.
I have often said that the Iraq War was a huge mistake and have called
it
a cluster *****.
And if you want no credibility, why do you even bother posting if your
posts have nothing to do with reality? Is looking like a jerk your only
goal?
Can you really be as stupid as the posts your write? Can anybody?
Do you really take Usenet so seriously as *this? You sound like you're
about to burst a blood vessel.
I don't like liars and hypocrites. I do enjoy exposing them. No bursting
blood vessels about it. But since when did you ever know what, or who the
hell you were talking about?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 09:12:41 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:3JedneFgHujp3d3ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<a46dnTjG8c7ir93ZRVn-sg@comcast.com>...
snip
Can you really be as stupid as the posts your write? Can anybody?
Do you really take Usenet so seriously as *this? You sound like you're
about to burst a blood vessel.
Maybe you should talk to someone...
<SNERK!> Oh, my pardon me <reaches for tissue>
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 12:19:24 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:3JedneFgHujp3d3ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<a46dnTjG8c7ir93ZRVn-sg@comcast.com>...
snip
Can you really be as stupid as the posts your write? Can anybody?
Do you really take Usenet so seriously as *this? You sound like you're
about to burst a blood vessel.
Maybe you should talk to someone...
<SNERK!> Oh, my pardon me <reaches for tissue>
Yes, that *DID* sound a lot like the pot calling the kettle black,
didn't it? :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 07:43:26 AM |
|
|
Stan de SD wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
And the idiot Lefty Liberal would rather blather nonsensical platitudes than
admit that Cindy's embarrassing antics do nothing to uphold the memory of
her son.
And you know everything about Casey Sheehan, I take it.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 03:44:57 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 07:41:10 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<TsSdndoABqDD_aLZRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
You sure like jumping in to take what appears to be personal offense
at things written to J. Young then claim other people are stupid because
they take you for someone supporting his positions.
Looks like your whole point is picking a fight...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 02:45:22 AM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:3JedneBgHui63N3ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
<TsSdndoABqDD_aLZRVn-tw@comcast.com>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:443f3331$0$1593$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
You sure like jumping in to take what appears to be personal offense
at things written to J. Young then claim other people are stupid because
they take you for someone supporting his positions.
Looks like your whole point is picking a fight...
Looks like once again you're too stupid to know what the hell you're talking
about. For once (and perhaps only once in the past several weeks), JYoung
has half a clue. Cindy Sheehan is an embarrassment and an insult to her
hero son, and a demonstrated media *****.
Ray is generally good at showing how stupid and unknowing (about much of
anything) he is, and you're turning out to be pretty much the same.
Sad. Oh well. Good thing I don't much give a damn about adolescent jerks.
But it's fun showing your dishonesty and hypocrisy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 12:57:32 PM |
|
|
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
You sure like jumping in to take what appears to be personal offense
at things written to J. Young then claim other people are stupid because
they take you for someone supporting his positions.
Looks like your whole point is picking a fight...
Looks like once again you're too stupid to know what the hell you're talking
about. For once (and perhaps only once in the past several weeks), JYoung
has half a clue. Cindy Sheehan is an embarrassment and an insult to her
hero son, and a demonstrated media *****.
Yeah, you're not a neocon. You just hate anybody who criticizes the
government. Her son died for a lie and you think that she's
embarrasing herself for pointing out the government's screwup.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
16 Apr 2006 03:50:13 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4441340c$0$1521$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
Previously, on alt.atheism, The Pervert in episode
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the
military
and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object
to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
You sure like jumping in to take what appears to be personal offense
at things written to J. Young then claim other people are stupid
because
they take you for someone supporting his positions.
Looks like your whole point is picking a fight...
Looks like once again you're too stupid to know what the hell you're
talking
about. For once (and perhaps only once in the past several weeks),
JYoung
has half a clue. Cindy Sheehan is an embarrassment and an insult to her
hero son, and a demonstrated media *****.
Yeah, you're not a neocon.
Ray, baby! Ya got one right! FINALLY! Congratulations.
You just hate anybody who criticizes the
government.
Aw, ya blew it, kid. I criticize the government, and this administation all
the time. Even in response to your posts! Does this mean you don't even
bother to read anything before launching into your usual kneejerk, fact-free
responses?
Her son died for a lie and you think that she's
embarrasing herself for pointing out the government's screwup.
As always, you're too prejudiced to be able to figure out what I think (even
though it's plainly written and easy to understand for a normal person) and
you're wrong. I think the Iraq War is a colossal mistake. If you bothered,
or knew *how* to read my posts to you, you'll note that I called the war a
cluster *****.
And yes, I believe she is embarrassing herself and sullying the memory of
her hero son. That she appeals to people of your intelligence (or lack
thereof) and maturity (or lack thereof) level confirms it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hc23hc" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 01:24:32 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Yeah, you're not a neocon. You just hate anybody who
criticizes the government. Her son died for a lie and you
think that she's embarrasing herself for pointing out the
government's screwup.
You're right on the money about The Pervert. His mass-murdering
background has given him a false sense of priorities.
The Pervert, war criminal, wrote:
< Dirty Uncle Jafo wrote:
I hope they do find WMD, just to shut up the assholes
who are clamoring for it. But who really cares? Saddam
had to go.
They had better find them, and I think they will. Otherwise, the
Anti-American types both here and abroad would have a field day
bashing both the US and the President.
In a moral duel between Cindy Sheehan and Bombsaway Bobb The Pervert,
I'll side with Cindy any day.
..
..
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "DCI" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 01:32:17 PM |
|
|
On 15 Apr 2006 11:24:32 -0700, "hc23hc" <hc23hc1@mac.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Yeah, you're not a neocon. You just hate anybody who
criticizes the government. Her son died for a lie and you
think that she's embarrasing herself for pointing out the
government's screwup.
You're right on the money about The Pervert. His mass-murdering
background has given him a false sense of priorities.
The Pervert, war criminal, wrote:
< Dirty Uncle Jafo wrote:
I hope they do find WMD, just to shut up the assholes
who are clamoring for it. But who really cares? Saddam
had to go.
They had better find them, and I think they will. Otherwise, the
Anti-American types both here and abroad would have a field day
bashing both the US and the President.
In a moral duel between Cindy Sheehan and Bombsaway Bobb The Pervert,
I'll side with Cindy any day.
Points made by Sheehan will be lost in history. Five to ten years from
now, no one will recall anything about her painful protests. The first
thing in war that is lost: truth.
DCI
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
15 Apr 2006 04:53:27 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
government. Her son died for a lie
No, see this is what I was saying to sd, you must never have served
because if you had you'd know he served and died out of loyalty to his
country, not to his mom or the president or any words any person said. I
grieve for the loss of every GI, whether it be "in combat" or by
accident, but I know that between the mid 70s and now it has been an all
*VOLUNTEER* military. No one threatened these guys with jail if they
didn't join up, they felt it was their duty to do so. These guys gave
you something and you use their deaths as political points to further
your agenda.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy Sheehan goes to war over no tombstone for son |
14 Apr 2006 05:57:40 AM |
|
|
The Pervert <pervert12@spambad.yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Miss Sheehan seems more intent in trying to save her own sullied
reputation
than remembering her son Casey; who volunteered to join the military and
The neocon would rather attck a grieving mother than dare to object to
wars and killing.
The war is a cluster ***** and she's still a nut job.
Because she dares to criticize your cult leader.
Then again, I'm not a neocon... despite your fictions.
Walk like a duck, quacks like a duck ...
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
