| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
15 Aug 2005 10:32:25 AM |
| Object: |
Cindy's Victory |
Cindy's Victory
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 15 August 2005
This thing, the wheels are coming off it.
- Gen. Barry McCaffrey, after returning from an inspection of Iraq,
08/12/2005.
They are sunburned and storm-lashed. They sleep in tents that sit
along the muddy earth of drainage ditches by the side of the road. They
have been heckled by "counter-demonstrators" who chanted "We don't
care!" during a rendition of "God Bless America." They have been attacked
by fire ants and hassled by local health inspectors. On Thursday morning,
at about 5:30am, they were blasted awake by a fourteen-car convoy of
Secret Service SUVs which roared through the camp at high speed while
leaning on their horns the whole time.
They have been jolted with fear when a local resident fired his
weapon into the air several times to make them go away. When the shooter,
one Larry Mattlage, was asked why he was firing his gun, he said, "We're
going to start doing our war and it's going to be underneath the law.
We're going to do whatever it takes." It is safe to say, therefore, that
their lives have been threatened.
The thing is, they've already won.
Cindy Sheehan and her ever-growing band of supporters intend to stay
in those ditches outside Bush's Crawford "ranch" until he comes out to
talk or until August 31st, whichever comes first. If he does not come out
by the end of the month, she intends to follow him to Washington and camp
out in front of the White House. She and the others have been there for
more than a week now, garnering more and more attention from the national
and international press. Yes, they are tired. Yes, they are
uncomfortable. Yes, they have already won.
The nearly 2,000 crosses, crescents and Stars of David that make up
the Arlington West cemetery, erected by the demonstrators a few days ago
to represent all the fallen American soldiers in Iraq, stretch almost a
mile down the country road. Bush had to drive past that on Friday when he
went to his fundraising shindig at the Broken Spoke Ranch. 54 crosses
have been added to the cemetery since he first showed up for his vacation
at the beginning of August. It takes a while to drive past them all. This
man, who cannot abide hearing or seeing anything in the way of dissent or
disagreement, saw those crosses whistle past his window. That is a
victory.
Over the weekend, as the camp prepared for the arrival of the
counter-demonstrators, a huge diesel pickup truck rumbled into camp with
its nose menacingly pointed towards the tents. It sat for a while, and
everyone waited to see what would happen. Ann Wright, the main organizer
of camp activities, finally approached the truck and met the driver. He
was a father, Wright discovered, and his son had been killed in Iraq.
He did not agree with this protest, he said, but wanted to know if
his son's name was on one of the crosses in the Arlington West cemetery.
Ann Wright invited the man to walk the rows of crosses and find his son's
name. They found it. Ann and the man from the truck sat down in front of
the cross, wrapped their arms around each other, and wept. Later, the man
shared a beer with Cindy Sheehan and told her he loved her. That is a
victory, one that surpasses any sort of mean politics.
For three years now, both before the invasion of Iraq began and
then after it was unleashed, millions of people have marched and screamed
and stomped in order to try to put a stop to this disaster. The Bush
administration was not pushed off its tracks even an inch in all this
time. Discussions and debates on why we are there and whether or not we
should leave have been bunted aside.
Half a dozen reasons for the invasion and occupation have been put
forth - weapons of mass destruction, ties to al Qaeda terrorism, the
building of a democracy, Hussein was a bad man - but in the end, the
debate is halted by the kind of brainless thinking that left us in
Vietnam for far too long: "We are there, so we have to stay." This was
the accepted wisdom.
Not anymore.
All the protests, all the articles, all the books, all the
whistleblowers, all the criticism combined have not packed the kind of
punch that one mother in a ditch has delivered to this administration's
carefully crafted fantasy vision of what is happening in Iraq. Suddenly,
Bush has been forced to go before cameras and try to explain why staying
in Iraq is the only option available. Suddenly, the accepted wisdom isn't
so accepted anymore. A majority of Americans, according to every
available poll, agree with the lady in the ditch and not with the
president.
Bush isn't doing a very good job of explaining his side of things,
and his people seem unable to keep their stories straight. After the
fourteen Marines from Ohio were killed in Iraq, Bush got up and stated
that it would be unreasonable for him to lay down a timetable for
withdrawal. Yet at the same time, his generals were bent over maps and
logistics notebooks, trying to do exactly that.
The Los Angeles Times on Saturday took a look at the mixed messages
coming from the war party. "Are the president and the Pentagon on the
same page over the war in Iraq?" asked the Times. "That question is
percolating in Washington after President Bush twice in the last 10 days
tried to clarify a message sent by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
and military leaders. After Rumsfeld and other Pentagon officials
indicated their desire to shift away from discussing the struggle against
terrorism as a 'war' - saying it placed too much emphasis on military
solutions to terrorism - Bush repeatedly used the word 'war' in an Aug. 3
speech to conservative state legislators."
"Then," continued the Times article, "on Thursday, Bush dismissed as
'rumors' and 'speculation' reports that U.S. commanders were
contemplating significant withdrawals of American troops from Iraq next
year. His comments came after Army Gen. George W. Casey, the top U.S.
military official in Iraq, and Army Lt. Gen. John R. Vines, the top
ground commander, had publicly raised exactly that possibility."
Hm.
On Sunday, out of nowhere, the Washington Post published a page-one
story titled "US Lowers Sights on What Can Be Achieved in Iraq." The
story stated, "The Bush administration is significantly lowering
expectations of what can be achieved in Iraq, recognizing that the United
States will have to settle for far less progress than originally
envisioned during the transition due to end in four months. The United
States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting
oil industry or a society in which the majority of people are free from
serious security or economic challenges."
The article goes on to describe how any "democracy" will have to bend
itself around the laws of Islam, a fact that chucks the secular-
government talking points into the round file. Iraqi women, should not
get their hopes up about being granted significant rights of any kind.
The kicker came in the third paragraph, which quotes an unnamed US
official saying, "What we expected to achieve was never realistic given
the timetable or what unfolded on the ground. We are in a process of
absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the
unreality that dominated at the beginning."
In other words, the whole thing was a Charlie Foxtrot from soup to
nuts. There are no weapons of mass destruction, the terrorists connected
to 9/11 were not there (though there are plenty there now learning how
best to kill Americans with bombs), and democracy is not to be found
anywhere on the menu. The hearts and flowers we were promised have not
come, and are not coming. Sure, Hussein is still a bad man, but that
rationale for this war is an outright laugher when compared to the cost
of getting rid of him. Though Bush clings desperately to his canned lines
to defend his actions, the facts speak for themselves. This whole bloody
enterprise has been a colossal, expensive, murderous failure.
The funny part is that Bush almost certainly could have maintained
the public fantasy with one simple act. He could have jumped into his
pickup truck last Saturday, when Cindy Sheehan was alone except for her
sister in that ditch, and driven down to see her. He could have invited
her into the shotgun seat and driven her around the neighborhood for a
few minutes. He could have then gone back up to the "ranch" and told the
press corps that he met with her, and that they had looked into each
other's hearts. That would have been the end of it.
He did not do that. Now, his generals are at loggerheads with the
public line coming from the White House about getting out of Iraq.
Unnamed officials are going on the record to state that the whole plan
was hare-brained from the word "go," and that the entire deal sits now in
the ashes of its own utterly ruined failure. Bush has to keep explaining
why we have to stay, why rearranging the deck chairs on this Titanic is a
noble and worthwhile process. Meanwhile, the whole world mocks him for
hiding from one woman and her broken heart.
Cindy Sheehan has done this with one act of conscience. She has
managed to do what no other protest or action or statement has been able
to do. She has knocked the wheels right off this absurd applecart. She
has called the man to account. She can hang her own "Mission
Accomplished" banner above her tent in that ditch. She has already won.
Her son would be very, very proud.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/081505Z.shtml
--
"Yes, I served in combat during Desert Storm." --Osprey (lying about his
military service) Message-ID: <1116416113.714744.65540
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
15 Aug 2005 10:46:33 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96B375687F332keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
Cindy's Victory
By William Rivers Pitt
Did Mr. Pitt post this?
LOL!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
15 Aug 2005 06:18:07 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96B375687F332keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4...
Cindy's Victory
By William Rivers Pitt
Did Mr. Pitt post this? LOL!!!!!!
Are you stupid enough to believe anyone will claim Pitt posted it? Maybe you
should report James to his ISP. (I'm sure they'd appreciate the laugh.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
15 Aug 2005 10:47:33 AM |
|
|
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
15 Aug 2005 06:19:27 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 08:07:12 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 11:30:07 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Keep telling yourself that.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
....just not you, right?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 08:16:55 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 11:32:52 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
What's more amazing is how you claim to be not responding to us, but you keep
on finding anyone who'll listen to your whining.
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Pretty funny for the prison babysitter who's back to posting from his
workplace.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Even the blind hog occasionally finds an acorn, and in this one instance we
both see it the same way.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 08:29:48 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
No, her husband is filing for divorce.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 11:34:15 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
Not all of us believe your fairy tale.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render him
dead. No, her husband is filing for divorce.
So, when are the GOP going to run you for office in South Carolina?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 08:38:49 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
No, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead. That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line; however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children. What did they die for?
What are they dying for Johnny? Seriously, tell me.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions, but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 08:55:46 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124199529.825595.107860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
Now, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead.
Case closed.
That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line;
Yes.
however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children.
Whose side are you on?
What did they die for?
They were ordered to do a job. If you don't like it, then don't join.
The draft serves us better than this ***** welfare army.
What are they dying for Johnny?
Open your eyes and see. They are dying because they are being killed.
Why are Iraqis dying?
For is a moot point.
Dead is dead.
Seriously, tell me.
Tried to.
I do not dwell on all this vain speculation.
Dead is dead.
Who cares what they are dying for?
Dead is dead.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
The answer will never change.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions,
I appreciate that.
but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
Because our military saw it fit to be involved there and anyone else who
wanted them there for whatever reason they saw fit to send them there.
You know the people of the USA are allowed to run wild and are duped into
funding the activities of foreign interests, don't you?
The days of real Constitutional rule in the USA were gone in 1973.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
I do not care if we were lied to or not. We are there and we went in and we
must complete the task in the best way we can. I leave that to our President
and his men to decide what is best, and I am glad he only has 'til 2009.
Hopefully, we will not need to invade Iran.
I very much do not like to fight.
This is deja vu 'all over again', huh?
Vietnam, OPEC oil sky high.
Will inflation begin to seep in next?
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Sometimes, extremists can bring the thing back to center, but I do not see
many of these extrmeists as being so extreme as far as I see them as the
types that will do whatever society seems to think is the chique thing to
do.
I think they are stylists, and have no regard for people who are not 'in
touch'.
Abortion is still chique to some people and so is homosexuality.
It isn't much different from people who think bad about people who dress
differently than they dress.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
Sure seems that way.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
"Sorry, but he was a soldier, ma'am."
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 09:06:11 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124199529.825595.107860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
Now, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead.
Case closed.
That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line;
Yes.
however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children.
Whose side are you on?
This isn't about sides, I am for wanting to know the truth..even if it
means admitting I was wrong.
What did they die for?
They were ordered to do a job. If you don't like it, then don't join.
The draft serves us better than this ***** welfare army.
Wait a minute Johnny, I don't know if you are a parent or not but I am.
And if that was my child, while I couldn't stop him or her from
joining, if they died I would want to know why and what for.
It's only fair, and a parent has the right to ask that.
What are they dying for Johnny?
Open your eyes and see. They are dying because they are being killed.
Why are Iraqis dying?
For is a moot point.
Dead is dead.
Seriously, tell me.
Tried to.
I do not dwell on all this vain speculation.
Dead is dead.
Who cares what they are dying for?
I do Johnny, as many other Americans do. As a vet myself, I care about
our military and what they are doing. I'm sorry Johnny, as much as I
would like to support your position and normally I do, I can't this
time.
Dead is dead.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
The answer will never change.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions,
I appreciate that.
but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
Because our military saw it fit to be involved there and anyone else who
wanted them there for whatever reason they saw fit to send them there.
You know the people of the USA are allowed to run wild and are duped into
funding the activities of foreign interests, don't you?
The days of real Constitutional rule in the USA were gone in 1973.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
I do not care if we were lied to or not. We are there and we went in and we
must complete the task in the best way we can.
Can we? The insurgency is growing Johnny, their attacks are becoming
more sophisticated. It's clear that they don't want our way of life
and the longer we are there the more likely the insurgency is going to
grow and the hatred towards the U.S. is going to grow. It's time, in
my opinion, that the U.S. swallow some pride and just admit this was
the wrong thing to do.
Like you, I am entitled to my opinion. And in my opinion, we made a
mistake. Parents shouldn't be looked upon as a military factory and be
expected to pump out kids so when they are old enough they can join the
military and die for no reason. Parents are losing their children,
wife's are losing their husbands, sisters and brothers are losing their
siblings. They deserve an answer Johnny, they need to know what they
died for.
I leave that to our President
and his men to decide what is best, and I am glad he only has 'til 2009.
Hopefully, we will not need to invade Iran.
I hope not too because if we do, kiss the price of oil goodbye..it will
sky rocket and a lot of us here at home will be in big trouble.
Nuclear weapons will most likely be used and we will be in a world of
trouble.
Russia learned their lesson and had to tuck their tail between their
legs after they outspent themselves fighting a war that could not be
won. I don't want to see the U.S. follow in their footsteps and make
the same mistake.
I very much do not like to fight.
This is deja vu 'all over again', huh?
Vietnam, OPEC oil sky high.
Will inflation begin to seep in next?
Isn't it already?
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Sometimes, extremists can bring the thing back to center, but I do not see
many of these extrmeists as being so extreme as far as I see them as the
types that will do whatever society seems to think is the chique thing to
do.
I think they are stylists, and have no regard for people who are not 'in
touch'.
Abortion is still chique to some people and so is homosexuality.
It isn't much different from people who think bad about people who dress
differently than they dress.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
Sure seems that way.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
"Sorry, but he was a soldier, ma'am."
Well Johnny, as much as I like to agree with you and you certainly have
your right to hold your opinion, this is one time that I respectfully
have to say I can't hold that opinion. A mother, father, sister,
brother, and/or wife deserves more than that. They too, made a
sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 09:43:02 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124201171.847993.195580@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124199529.825595.107860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from
the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in
Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay
attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her
son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could
render
him dead.
Now, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead.
Case closed.
That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line;
Yes.
however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children.
Whose side are you on?
This isn't about sides,
It is to me. How can you win a war without knowing the sides?
I am for wanting to know the truth..even if it
means admitting I was wrong.
Which is a good thing. But, you don't need to be wrong, right?
What did they die for?
They were ordered to do a job. If you don't like it, then don't join.
The draft serves us better than this ***** welfare army.
Wait a minute Johnny, I don't know if you are a parent or not but I am.
Does that mean you would rather your son or daughter go into the welfare
army and be killed in a war that would confuse you as to why we are involved
in it?
And if that was my child, while I couldn't stop him or her from
joining, if they died I would want to know why and what for.
It's only fair, and a parent has the right to ask that.
Sure thing. But there is no difference in a welfare army and the draft.
Both are there to guard and/or fight.
What are they dying for Johnny?
Open your eyes and see. They are dying because they are being killed.
Why are Iraqis dying?
For is a moot point.
Dead is dead.
Seriously, tell me.
Tried to.
I do not dwell on all this vain speculation.
Dead is dead.
Who cares what they are dying for?
I do Johnny, as many other Americans do. As a vet myself, I care about
our military and what they are doing. I'm sorry Johnny, as much as I
would like to support your position and normally I do, I can't this
time.
Sorry. I can understand the questioning.
But, sometimes it is easier just to look at it the way I was telling you. If
you don't it is possible you will never find the a better answer. Semper
Fidelis, right?
Dead is dead.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
The answer will never change.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions,
I appreciate that.
but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
Because our military saw it fit to be involved there and anyone else who
wanted them there for whatever reason they saw fit to send them there.
You know the people of the USA are allowed to run wild and are duped into
funding the activities of foreign interests, don't you?
The days of real Constitutional rule in the USA were gone in 1973.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
I do not care if we were lied to or not. We are there and we went in and
we
must complete the task in the best way we can.
Can we? The insurgency is growing Johnny, their attacks are becoming
more sophisticated.
So, we will probably pull out eventually.
That could work to our advantage and save us from having to foot the entire
reparations bill.
It's clear that they don't want our way of life
and the longer we are there the more likely the insurgency is going to
grow and the hatred towards the U.S. is going to grow. It's time, in
my opinion, that the U.S. swallow some pride and just admit this was
the wrong thing to do.
I won't.
That is too much bad to say about Bush, imo.
I wasn't wrong, and I do not think Mr. Bush was wrong.
Like you, I am entitled to my opinion. And in my opinion, we made a
mistake.
It ain't over 'til it's over.
Parents shouldn't be looked upon as a military factory and be
expected to pump out kids so when they are old enough they can join the
military and die for no reason. Parents are losing their children,
wife's are losing their husbands, sisters and brothers are losing their
siblings. They deserve an answer Johnny, they need to know what they
died for.
Can you ask them?
I leave that to our President
and his men to decide what is best, and I am glad he only has 'til 2009.
Hopefully, we will not need to invade Iran.
I hope not too because if we do, kiss the price of oil goodbye..it will
sky rocket and a lot of us here at home will be in big trouble.
Nuclear weapons will most likely be used and we will be in a world of
trouble.
Russia learned their lesson and had to tuck their tail between their
legs after they outspent themselves fighting a war that could not be
won. I don't want to see the U.S. follow in their footsteps and make
the same mistake.
Ok. I read all that.
I very much do not like to fight.
This is deja vu 'all over again', huh?
Vietnam, OPEC oil sky high.
Will inflation begin to seep in next?
Isn't it already?
Not bad though.
It isn't as bad as ti was in the seventies, not even close.
Gold is at ~$450 an ounce which isn't bad either, imo.
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Sometimes, extremists can bring the thing back to center, but I do not
see
many of these extrmeists as being so extreme as far as I see them as the
types that will do whatever society seems to think is the chique thing to
do.
I think they are stylists, and have no regard for people who are not 'in
touch'.
Abortion is still chique to some people and so is homosexuality.
It isn't much different from people who think bad about people who dress
differently than they dress.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
Sure seems that way.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
"Sorry, but he was a soldier, ma'am."
Well Johnny, as much as I like to agree with you and you certainly have
your right to hold your opinion, this is one time that I respectfully
have to say I can't hold that opinion. A mother, father, sister,
brother, and/or wife deserves more than that. They too, made a
sacrifice.
They get more than that.
You forgot about the commendations and flag on casket stuff?
Remember you are in the U.S.A.
Don't join the military if you don't feel up to fighting.
Any more questions?
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 03:06:55 PM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124201171.847993.195580@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124199529.825595.107860@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from
the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in
Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay
attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her
son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could
render
him dead.
Now, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead.
Case closed.
That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line;
Yes.
however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children.
Whose side are you on?
This isn't about sides,
It is to me. How can you win a war without knowing the sides?
I am for wanting to know the truth..even if it
means admitting I was wrong.
Which is a good thing. But, you don't need to be wrong, right?
Johnny, I was wrong though. Bush was wrong, this war is wrong. It's
costing us dearly and the cost is going to get much higher if we don't
do something now to correct it. Not just in lives lost, but the price
we are going to pay with the economy.
There wasn't any WMD Johnny, and that is what we were sold on as our
reason for going in. Bush is losing support, even in his own party.
We want to save face and we want to save our pride, but it is getting
increasingly difficult to do that as we are running out of reasons to
be in Iraq.
So in my opinion, I was wrong in my support and I have no problem
admitting it. I want us to do the right thing Johnny and bring our men
and women home and start taking care of problems right here at home.
We are not going to win this war.
What did they die for?
They were ordered to do a job. If you don't like it, then don't join.
The draft serves us better than this ***** welfare army.
Wait a minute Johnny, I don't know if you are a parent or not but I am.
Does that mean you would rather your son or daughter go into the welfare
army and be killed in a war that would confuse you as to why we are involved
in it?
If my son or daughter joins the military, I would want it to be on
their own choice. If they were sent off to fight for our country, and
God forbid died, I would want to know what they fought for and what
they died for.
Right now, Arlington is growing daily with soldiers that frankly I
can't tell you what they died for.
It's easy to say, "they died for our country". O.k., from what though?
What was the actual reason?
During WWII, we knew the reason. They died for our freedom. Our
freedom was threatened in WWII.
Our freedom is threatened from terrorism, but is the war in Iraq really
the war against terrorism? I once thought so, but I am not so sure
now.
There was no WMD and there was no link found between Iraq and 9/11, the
two primary reasons we were told why we were going in there.
Now, terrorism is growing and the hatred is growing as long as we are
in there. They think we are trying to take over Johnny, and they think
we want to take the oil.
What woke me up to this was reading a speech made by Bin Laden in 1996,
where he predicted that the U.S. would invade Iraq, take over and
divided it up into three sections.
If you were from the Middle east, living in Iraq, Iran, Saudi, Turkey,
and so on...wouldn't it look that way to you? I am not supporting Bin
Laden in any way, I personally look forward to the day we either find
his bones or we kill him ourselves. But I am trying to view this from
another point of view.
Everyday, their fight grows stronger and we lose more people. I am
questioning the war Johnny, and questioning the reasons. This isn't
about taking sides, this is about wanting to know the truth.
Were we lied too?
Why?
What are we going to do?
Are our men and women dying in vein?
And if that was my child, while I couldn't stop him or her from
joining, if they died I would want to know why and what for.
It's only fair, and a parent has the right to ask that.
Sure thing. But there is no difference in a welfare army and the draft.
Both are there to guard and/or fight.
What are they dying for Johnny?
Open your eyes and see. They are dying because they are being killed.
Why are Iraqis dying?
For is a moot point.
Dead is dead.
Seriously, tell me.
Tried to.
I do not dwell on all this vain speculation.
Dead is dead.
Who cares what they are dying for?
I do Johnny, as many other Americans do. As a vet myself, I care about
our military and what they are doing. I'm sorry Johnny, as much as I
would like to support your position and normally I do, I can't this
time.
Sorry. I can understand the questioning.
But, sometimes it is easier just to look at it the way I was telling you. If
you don't it is possible you will never find the a better answer. Semper
Fidelis, right?
Yes, Semper Fidelis. I will always believe that. I will also believe
in going to war for just reasons though, not just blindly following our
leader and accepting death for no reason.
Dead is dead.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
The answer will never change.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions,
I appreciate that.
but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
Because our military saw it fit to be involved there and anyone else who
wanted them there for whatever reason they saw fit to send them there.
You know the people of the USA are allowed to run wild and are duped into
funding the activities of foreign interests, don't you?
The days of real Constitutional rule in the USA were gone in 1973.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
I do not care if we were lied to or not. We are there and we went in and
we
must complete the task in the best way we can.
Can we? The insurgency is growing Johnny, their attacks are becoming
more sophisticated.
So, we will probably pull out eventually.
That could work to our advantage and save us from having to foot the entire
reparations bill.
Let's hope something happens soon.
It's clear that they don't want our way of life
and the longer we are there the more likely the insurgency is going to
grow and the hatred towards the U.S. is going to grow. It's time, in
my opinion, that the U.S. swallow some pride and just admit this was
the wrong thing to do.
I won't.
That is too much bad to say about Bush, imo.
I wasn't wrong, and I do not think Mr. Bush was wrong.
Like you, I am entitled to my opinion. And in my opinion, we made a
mistake.
It ain't over 'til it's over.
True
Parents shouldn't be looked upon as a military factory and be
expected to pump out kids so when they are old enough they can join the
military and die for no reason. Parents are losing their children,
wife's are losing their husbands, sisters and brothers are losing their
siblings. They deserve an answer Johnny, they need to know what they
died for.
Can you ask them?
Johnny, the other week I talked with a mother who lost her son in Iraq.
There are no answers, and there is no closure for them right now.
I leave that to our President
and his men to decide what is best, and I am glad he only has 'til 2009.
Hopefully, we will not need to invade Iran.
I hope not too because if we do, kiss the price of oil goodbye..it will
sky rocket and a lot of us here at home will be in big trouble.
Nuclear weapons will most likely be used and we will be in a world of
trouble.
Russia learned their lesson and had to tuck their tail between their
legs after they outspent themselves fighting a war that could not be
won. I don't want to see the U.S. follow in their footsteps and make
the same mistake.
Ok. I read all that.
I very much do not like to fight.
This is deja vu 'all over again', huh?
Vietnam, OPEC oil sky high.
Will inflation begin to seep in next?
Isn't it already?
Not bad though.
It isn't as bad as ti was in the seventies, not even close.
Gold is at ~$450 an ounce which isn't bad either, imo.
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Sometimes, extremists can bring the thing back to center, but I do not
see
many of these extrmeists as being so extreme as far as I see them as the
types that will do whatever society seems to think is the chique thing to
do.
I think they are stylists, and have no regard for people who are not 'in
touch'.
Abortion is still chique to some people and so is homosexuality.
It isn't much different from people who think bad about people who dress
differently than they dress.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
Sure seems that way.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
"Sorry, but he was a soldier, ma'am."
Well Johnny, as much as I like to agree with you and you certainly have
your right to hold your opinion, this is one time that I respectfully
have to say I can't hold that opinion. A mother, father, sister,
brother, and/or wife deserves more than that. They too, made a
sacrifice.
They get more than that.
You forgot about the commendations and flag on casket stuff?
Remember you are in the U.S.A.
Don't join the military if you don't feel up to fighting.
Any more questions?
Yes, Johnny, I am going to have more questions. While I will always
stand up and support our military and be proud of them, I will ask
questions. They are doing their job, they are following orders. This
is not their fault, they are not to blame. I will not lie and say that
my eyes don't tear up when I see another casket coming home. In my
heart and in my prayers, I say to the American soldier, "job well done
soldier". But in the back, I ask myself, "did you die in vein"? "did
you die for a lie"?
The parents have a right to ask, and I believe Bush should face them
and talk to them. Which from an article I read yesterday he is doing.
I do believe he has met with more than 900 families so far, and from
what the article said Bush is very sympathetic with the parents. One
mother said he was like a father figure, and he showed true emotion and
found it very hard to answer their questions. Which if I was in Bush's
shoes, I don't think I could answer their questions either. What do
you say???
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 03:25:48 PM |
|
|
Was it this discussion with the mother whose sone died in the war, that
changed your mind?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 09:05:40 AM |
|
|
On 16 Aug 2005 06:38:49 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
No, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead. That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line; however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children. What did they die for?
What are they dying for Johnny? Seriously, tell me.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions, but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
That Bush is a greedy *****?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
19 Aug 2005 10:29:47 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1124198215.469574.48250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
Yep. Exactly one reason why they will not be regarded as great in Heaven.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Well, yes, and the reason is because he agreed to a job that could render
him dead.
No, her husband is filing for divorce.
Yes, it's true he agreed to do a job that could render him dead. That
is something all parents must accept when their child signs the dotted
line; however, they still deserve the right to know why our country
sacrificed their children. What did they die for?
What are they dying for Johnny? Seriously, tell me.
Because like most Americans, I am asking the same question now.
Johnny, you know that for the most part I am going to agree with most
of your positions, but in the war in Iraq, I am wondering why we are
there.
Ah... the good question. :)
Here's an explanation by one who has briefed the Pentagon on such
things. I tend to believe that the author knows exactly what he's
talking about.
http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/published/pentagonsnewmap.htm
Note that it was written prior to the invasion.
To pique your interest, here's the article's opening statement:
"LET ME TELL YOU why military engagement with Saddam Hussein’s regime in
Baghdad is not only necessary and inevitable, but good."
When you compare what he states with America's history since WWII, you
will see that his explanation seems spot-on. You will also see that what
he states would *not* be approved of by the American public. If Bush had
told the people that Iraq was only the first step, he would have been
run out of office before he finished speaking. Thus, he lied.
We were lied too Johnny, it's as simple as that and we must realize
that our President along with intelligence was wrong.
As far as what these loons, like keegan, humphrey, somewriter (who by
the way has about fifty different alias and is actually talking to
herself using two different alias), and other loons..they are just
that..loons. I don't pay attention to their crying and whining, they
are extremist.
Like the hard core right wingers they accuse of being blind, they are
no better. They are blind to other possibilities and to the possibility
that they are often wrong.
But seriously Johnny, if you were President Bush and I was Cindy
Sheehan and I asked you..
"Mr. President, why did my son have to die"?
What would you say?
"He didn't have to, but he showed great courage by accepting the risk
that led to it. There is no greater thing for a man to die for than in
an effort to help another, which is exactly what your son was doing when
tragedy struck him. He was attempting to rescue those who would lay down
their own lives to rescue him. He took a risk that only a small
percentage of men are willing to take, and he deserves to be honored by
all for sacrificing himself so unselfishly.
Mrs. Sheehan, that is the 'noble cause' that your son died for, and it
demeans his sacrifice for his own family to claim that his death meant
nothing. He was an adult who made a choice, and his decision should be
respected by all of those who respected him.
Now get your ***** back on your little 'Impeachment Tour' bus and get your
stupid little political agenda out of my face, you Mary Schindler
wanna-be. As President of the United States, I have better things to do
than waste my time explaining the obvious to the ignorant. Have a nice day."
That's if I were President Dwyer. President Bush would just say
something along the lines of "well... umm... it was a noble cause...
uhh... he was liberating the Iraqi people... uhh... overthrowing an evil
dictator... umm... uhh... doing noble things in a noble way... umm... he
was nobly doing noble things for the Iraqi people." :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
16 Aug 2005 09:04:18 AM |
|
|
On 16 Aug 2005 06:16:55 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Johnny wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xz2n5z4.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works from the
publishers?
What are you going to do about it? Call his police department?
I'm not as stupid as you.
Anyone could notify the publisher(s) of the copyrighted work(s).
What is making me laugh is during the whole time I would post an
article, people like humphrey and barnes would scream "copyright"
violations. Isn't it amazing the double standards they hold?
Their motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
In regards to Cindy Sheehan though, I think Bush needs to pay attention
to what these mothers are saying. She has a right to know why her son
died and what for.
Would you rather Sheehan hear the truth, or Bush's version of the
truth?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Cindy's Victory |
15 Aug 2005 12:03:39 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:47:33 -0400,
John Wentzky <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
You got permission to reprint all these copyrighted works
from the publishers?
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!
He's really getting your goat, isn't he, pathetic little
laughingstock of an ignorant bigot?
Funnier than hell to watch!!!!!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
P.S. -- Oh, BTW... you can COUNT on the fact that those
writers and publishers are happy as clams to see their
indictments of losers like you get even WIDER
dissemination, thanks to patriotic egalitarians like
James Keegan. I've been a writer and publisher for
most of my life, and I find it delightful when people
do that. Egalitarians don't write about these matters
out of greed. We do it out of DEDICATION to seeing
people being treated RIGHT. (E.g., my strategy &
tactics book against the Anti-Choice bigots -- "The
Pro-Choice VICTORY Handbook," sells on Amazon
almost exactly at cost, for that very reason. The more
people who read it, the more damage can be done
to the loathsome agendas of the RRR cultists.)
And... to James: Keep up the GREAT work!!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|