| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Mike D." |
| Date: |
07 Mar 2005 01:41:52 PM |
| Object: |
comment |
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
.
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 11:14:15 PM |
|
|
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> writes:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
It says a lot about your lack of thought, for sure -- assuming your alleged
deity exists, he created us (so says the Babble)...so obviously he's not quite
the benevolent deity you want people to believe he is. Got any other idiotic
assertions you need debunked?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Grand Rapids 1 (March 7)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, March 9 at Chicago, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike D." |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 01:07:21 AM |
|
|
Here is number three of the people who can't argue their way out of a paper
bag group. You make your post with, I can't even call them misleading, you
just make facts up.
QUESTION Where in my post which you replied to, or in ANY of my posts, did I
say that God is benevolent? I didn't even assert that God Almighty exists,
although YOU said I did. WTF are you talking about? Are you knowingly making
false statements, or are you just not too sharp mentally? Is it perhaps
something else? Mike.
PS debunk this assertion Whoever is the person making statements on this
usenet group using the name "Patrick Lee Humphrey" makes statements so
obviously false as to lead an observer to think he is either stupid or
lying. DEBUNK THAT. Mike.
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhdjmk9co.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> writes:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so
maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly
acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
It says a lot about your lack of thought, for sure -- assuming your
alleged
deity exists, he created us (so says the Babble)...so obviously he's not
quite
the benevolent deity you want people to believe he is. Got any other
idiotic
assertions you need debunked?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Grand Rapids 1 (March 7)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, March 9 at Chicago, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 02:53:48 AM |
|
|
(Top-posting repaired)
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhdjmk9co.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> writes:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
It says a lot about your lack of thought, for sure -- assuming your alleged
deity exists, he created us (so says the Babble)...so obviously he's not
quite the benevolent deity you want people to believe he is. Got any other
idiotic assertions you need debunked?
Here is number three of the people who can't argue their way out of a paper
bag group. You make your post with, I can't even call them misleading, you
just make facts up.
....and your proof of that is where, precisely?
QUESTION Where in my post which you replied to, or in ANY of my posts, did I
say that God is benevolent? I didn't even assert that God Almighty exists,
although YOU said I did. WTF are you talking about? Are you knowingly making
false statements, or are you just not too sharp mentally? Is it perhaps
something else? Mike.
You're the schmuck dragging the Christian deity into it, and you obviously
couldn't care less about your lack of logic in making your argument, whatever
it may be. "I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's description of human
beings." -- you said it, and it's no great effort to infer you're using it as
your authority. I'll continue staying clear of organized religion, seeing its
less than stellar record in showing concern for humanity when it interferes
with the church's power over the rest of us.
PS debunk this assertion Whoever is the person making statements on this
usenet group using the name "Patrick Lee Humphrey" makes statements so
obviously false as to lead an observer to think he is either stupid or
lying. DEBUNK THAT. Mike.
You're making the assertion, Jersey Boy -- so you get to prove it. Try not to
sprain anything in your head any more than it's already affected.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Grand Rapids 1 (March 7)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, March 9 at Chicago, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, itll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD RIDDANCE!" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 11:36:20 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:07:21 -0800,
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
Here is number three of the people who can't argue
their way out of a paper bag group.
Nah. There were a LOT of loons in here that were more
hateful and ignorant than you are, BEFORE you ever showed
up. You'll have to post a whole lot more of your moronic and
sociopathic swill before you can achieve the ranking of
"Number 3."
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "EggNog" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 09:11:37 PM |
|
|
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:nbOdnXPbspGkGbHfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
Yes, very twisted are some humans.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 11:11:20 PM |
|
|
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
It's interesting that you cite the Bible while violating one of it's
most important commandments by lying about people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike D." |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 12:58:48 AM |
|
|
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
Is that how "pro-choicers" here and elsewhere argue their points? I refer
to you just calling my opinion a lie at face-value. Also, I refer to Mr
Creaig Chilton's ridiclous and dishonest arguments in a slightly previous
post. Is that how it is anything the oter side says is a lie, and any
inconvenient facts are not true, and what we say is fact, etcetera? Sheesh.
Mike.
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d0jc5o$osc$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so
maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly
acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
It's interesting that you cite the Bible while violating one of it's
most important commandments by lying about people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 11:02:10 PM |
|
|
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
You have sex with dogs.
Is that a lie or an opinion?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike D." |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 11:09:55 PM |
|
|
I consider it a lie, because you don't believe it is true. Since you
knowingly make false statements, that makes you a liar by definition. It may
also or may not be an opinion. Mike.
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d0m00i$qje$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
You have sex with dogs.
Is that a lie or an opinion?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 09:10:39 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:09:55 -0800, "Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <k9mdnfr4V5LBMbLfRVn-qA@comcast.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d0m00i$qje$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
You have sex with dogs.
Is that a lie or an opinion?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
I consider it a lie, because you don't believe it is true.
How do you know that? Perhaps he has a reason for this position. Why
should what you consider matter?
Since you
knowingly make false statements, that makes you a liar by definition.
That is a circular argument. Can you prove Ray does not in fact think
you have sex with dogs?
It may
also or may not be an opinion. Mike.
Evidently you cannot make up your mind.
What is Top-Posting and why is it considered bad?
http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike D." |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
10 Mar 2005 09:03:25 PM |
|
|
What I consider matters because he asked me a question. Do you even read the
***** you respond to before you start yapping? Buttmunch. Mike.
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:igev21hu01ers15e1c1tf2mq6t18rk6rfm@4ax.com...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:09:55 -0800, "Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <k9mdnfr4V5LBMbLfRVn-qA@comcast.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d0m00i$qje$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
You have sex with dogs.
Is that a lie or an opinion?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
I consider it a lie, because you don't believe it is true.
How do you know that? Perhaps he has a reason for this position. Why
should what you consider matter?
Since you
knowingly make false statements, that makes you a liar by definition.
That is a circular argument. Can you prove Ray does not in fact think
you have sex with dogs?
It may
also or may not be an opinion. Mike.
Evidently you cannot make up your mind.
What is Top-Posting and why is it considered bad?
http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
10 Mar 2005 06:46:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:03:25 -0800, "Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <5JidnZrrCbepfa3fRVn-iA@comcast.com>
wrote:
"Attila" <prochoice@here.now> wrote in message
news:igev21hu01ers15e1c1tf2mq6t18rk6rfm@4ax.com...
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:09:55 -0800, "Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> in
alt.abortion with message-id <k9mdnfr4V5LBMbLfRVn-qA@comcast.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d0m00i$qje$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion.
You have sex with dogs.
Is that a lie or an opinion?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
I consider it a lie, because you don't believe it is true.
How do you know that? Perhaps he has a reason for this position. Why
should what you consider matter?
Since you
knowingly make false statements, that makes you a liar by definition.
That is a circular argument. Can you prove Ray does not in fact think
you have sex with dogs?
It may
also or may not be an opinion. Mike.
Evidently you cannot make up your mind.
What is Top-Posting and why is it considered bad?
http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html
What I consider matters because he asked me a question. Do you even read the
***** you respond to before you start yapping? Buttmunch. Mike.
Yes
Did you read the top post reference?
What is Top-Posting and why is it considered bad?
http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/faq_topp.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, itll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD RIDDANCE!" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 11:57:11 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:58:48 -0800,
"Mike D." <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:
Mike D. <mikdan7@comcast.net> wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God
allow the evil that happens to innocents to occur". I guess
they are ignorant of The Bible'sdescription of human beings.
The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe God allows
evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)
man does not deserve any better. People really don't like to
truly acknowledge and accept this . The bottom line, is, in
rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
Uh-huh. And such people make headlines for weeks, every
time they do it. I'll bet you can't tell us the names of ones you
can count on the fingers of one hand. I'll spot you the first one:
Susan Smith.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
A lot of utter NONSENSE on *your* part, yes.
It's interesting that you cite the Bible while violating one of
it's most important commandments by lying about people.
I didn't lie. I expressed an opinion. Is that how "pro-choicers"
here and elsewhere argue their points? I refer to you just calling
my opinion a lie at face-value. Also, I refer to Mr. Craig Chilton's
ridiclous and dishonest arguments in a slightly previous post.
Hey! LOSER! you are so bone-**dumb**, you whine about
people who told NO lies, while **you** are stupid enough to LIE
about *them*. (LOL!! What a tool.)
Talk about being a complete idiot! Are you trying to win a
trophy for that?
[[[ READERS: **This** should be FUN!!! ]]] --
Let's see you PROVE that **anything** I said in ANY response
post to you was *either* ridiculous OR dishonest.
[[[ Of course, since that's not the case, he
won't even BEGIN to be able to do that.
So if he does what *most* of those lying
bigots do when cornered, we can expect
him now to either (1) spew even MORE
lies, thus making an even **bigger** *****
of himself... (2) WHINE a whole lot... or
(3) IGNORE this post and RUN like hell. ]]]
<Remaining incoherent tripe of Mike's flushed>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 12:29:36 PM |
|
|
Mike D. wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
Here's something that says even more: I understand the BTK killer was an
avid churchgoer.
--
--sexkitten--
Let the president answer a higher anarchy
Strap him with an Ak-47, let him go, fight his own war
Let him impress daddy that way
No more blood for oil, we got our own battles to fight on our own soil
No more psychological warfare, to trick us to thinking that we ain't loyal
If we don't serve our own country, we're patronizing a hero
Look in his eyes its all lies
The stars and stripes, they've been swiped, washed out and wiped
And replaced with his own face, Mosh now or die
If I get sniped tonight you know why,
Cause I told you to fight.
Eminem "Mosh"
.
|
|
|
| User: "EggNog" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 09:14:24 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:393kt9F5vcb5sU1@individual.net...
Mike D. wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so
maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly
acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
Here's something that says even more: I understand the BTK killer was an
avid churchgoer.
--
--sexkitten--
Let the president answer a higher anarchy
Strap him with an Ak-47, let him go, fight his own war
Let him impress daddy that way
No more blood for oil,
Oil War? Oh yes, that's right. We went to war for oil. Lol........
That's why in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 09:20:08 PM |
|
|
In article <sbidneRzsrwMhbDfRVn-hQ@intertex.net>, EggNog
<NotRealAddres@hotmail.com> wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:393kt9F5vcb5sU1@individual.net...
Mike D. wrote:
People often say, rhetorically, "How can any just God allow the evil that
happens to innocents to occur". I guess they are ignorant of The Bible's
description of human beings. The Bible says that people are vile, so
maybe
God allows evil to happen to humans because (as it says in The Bible)man
does not deserve any better. People really don't like to truly
acknowledge
and accept this . The bottom line, is, in rhetorical form
Q: How evil/wicked/foul/vile are humans?
A: So much so, that they kill their own babies.
I guess that says a lot. Mike.
Here's something that says even more: I understand the BTK killer was an
avid churchgoer.
--
--sexkitten--
Let the president answer a higher anarchy
Strap him with an Ak-47, let him go, fight his own war
Let him impress daddy that way
No more blood for oil,
Oil War? Oh yes, that's right. We went to war for oil. Lol........
That's why in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, itll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD RIDDANCE!" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
07 Mar 2005 10:24:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 08:50:52 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 10:11:05 AM |
|
|
In article <gZiXd.635$P15.269@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
$2.80 in some parts of California.
Osprey claims it approached $2.00 under President Clinton. Here is an
article from a year ago.
http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a55/news/an552004058.htm
Interestingly, the articles says the gas prices are at "record levels"
at 1.838 cents.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 02:47:20 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <gZiXd.635$P15.269@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
$2.80 in some parts of California.
It just broke $2.00/gallon (87 octane) here, 93/94 octane is nearly
$2.40 a gallon. At these prices, I can't wait for the spring thaw when
I can break out the motorcycle and enjoy 40 miles/gallon again (give or
take a few miles depending on driving conditions). The problem is,
until the spring thaw, my wife and I are driving vehicles that get 15
to 20 MPG (city driving). I like the comfort of a little bigger
vehicle, so I guess I'm going to have to pay for it. *sigh*
Osprey claims it approached $2.00 under President Clinton. Here is
an
article from a year ago.
Who the hell believes anything Asspry says?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 09:35:10 PM |
|
|
In article <1110314840.050325.208410@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Pr0r3p <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <gZiXd.635$P15.269@news01.roc.ny>, Frank Dwyer
<fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
$2.80 in some parts of California.
It just broke $2.00/gallon (87 octane) here, 93/94 octane is nearly
$2.40 a gallon. At these prices, I can't wait for the spring thaw when
I can break out the motorcycle and enjoy 40 miles/gallon again (give or
take a few miles depending on driving conditions). The problem is,
until the spring thaw, my wife and I are driving vehicles that get 15
to 20 MPG (city driving). I like the comfort of a little bigger
vehicle, so I guess I'm going to have to pay for it. *sigh*
Well - at least you got that $60 tax cut from the Republicans.
Osprey claims it approached $2.00 under President Clinton. Here is
an
article from a year ago.
Who the hell believes anything Asspry says?
True.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 07:45:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:50:52 GMT,
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
A few weeks ago, I paid $1.47 at a Macon, GA station that
made the national news a couple of days later, as being the nation's
lowest-priced gas station. My brother (who lives in JAX, Florida)
stopped there a couple of days ago and said it was up to $1.66.
(Georgia typically -- due to its low taxes on gas -- has the best
gasoline prices in the nation.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 02:37:59 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton <dpn@mchsi.com> writes:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:50:52 GMT,
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
A few weeks ago, I paid $1.47 at a Macon, GA station that
made the national news a couple of days later, as being the nation's
lowest-priced gas station. My brother (who lives in JAX, Florida)
stopped there a couple of days ago and said it was up to $1.66.
(Georgia typically -- due to its low taxes on gas -- has the best
gasoline prices in the nation.)
A couple of weeks ago, you could find regular for $1.639 (US) at a few Diamond
Shamrocks in the southwest metro here (oddly enough, they were clustered
around 6 south of the Harris/Fort Bend county line), and tonight the cheapest
Dale and I saw was $1.819 at a Conoco/Phillips along the I-10 Katy. It can
get a lot worse than that, though, as some locations along the major freeways
are going for $1.959 for regular...and that's with having more than a few
refineries less than 20 miles away over on the east edge of the city limits
along the Ship Channel.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Grand Rapids 1 (March 7)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, March 9 at Chicago, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 11:35:50 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:50:52 GMT,
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
A few weeks ago, I paid $1.47 at a Macon, GA station that
made the national news a couple of days later, as being the nation's
lowest-priced gas station. My brother (who lives in JAX, Florida)
stopped there a couple of days ago and said it was up to $1.66.
(Georgia typically -- due to its low taxes on gas -- has the best
gasoline prices in the nation.)
Damn... I'll have to do the math. It might be more economical for me to
drive down to Georgia and fill up... and I'm in NY. :)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, itll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD RIDDANCE!" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
09 Mar 2005 12:27:52 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:35:50 GMT, Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net>
wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:50:52 GMT,
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
That's on the low-end of the spectrum.
http://www.gaspricewatch.com/usgas_index.asp
I pay about $2 around here.
A few weeks ago, I paid $1.47 at a Macon, GA station that
made the national news a couple of days later, as being the nation's
lowest-priced gas station. My brother (who lives in JAX, Florida)
stopped there a couple of days ago and said it was up to $1.66.
(Georgia typically -- due to its low taxes on gas -- has the best
gasoline prices in the nation.)
Damn... I'll have to do the math. It might be more economical for me to
drive down to Georgia and fill up... and I'm in NY. :)
LOL!!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 02:48:51 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
$1.98 here. I rest my case.
--
--sexkitten--
In Loving Memory of Jim Addison
9/18/71 - 12/30/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 09:35:10 PM |
|
|
In article <396hdhF431m2sU1@individual.net>, --sexkitten--
<ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
$1.98 here. I rest my case.
Here where?
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 10:07:30 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <396hdhF431m2sU1@individual.net>, --sexkitten--
<ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton -- On 1/20/09, it'll be BYE-BYE Bushie! Then, GOOD
RIDDANCE! wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:08 -0800,
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote:
"EggNog" wrote:
[ ... ]
...in CA fuel is $2.47 Gallon today.
(In the cheap areas of town...)
YIKES!!! And I've been griping about the $1.81 I've been
paying in Iowa... up from $1.53 only about 4 or 5 weeks ago!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
$1.98 here. I rest my case.
Here where?
Bullhead, Arizona.
--
--sexkitten--
In Loving Memory of Jim Addison
9/18/71 - 12/30/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 10:11:27 PM |
|
|
In article <397b4uF5n2kgvU1@individual.net>, --sexkitten--
<ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote:
$1.98 here. I rest my case.
Here where?
Bullhead, Arizona.
I heard it was really high in AZ
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: comment |
08 Mar 2005 10:12:28 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <397b4uF5n2kgvU1@individual.net>, --sexkitten--
<ladyhawk_twoFILTER@hotmail.com> wrote:
$1.98 here. I rest my case.
Here where?
Bullhead, Arizona.
I heard it was really high in AZ
It's been mid-range here. We're right at the CA-AZ-NV border, and
everyone's been coming over to the Arizona side to buy. Phoenix is
probably higher.
--
--sexkitten--
In Loving Memory of Jim Addison
9/18/71 - 12/30/04
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
