|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
13 Sep 2004 07:12:37 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
13 Sep 2004 08:24:37 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
You're too stupid to know how to be afraid.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 01:03:24 AM |
|
|
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
"a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions"
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 05:33:47 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 08:06:31 AM |
|
|
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 01:28:52 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
You need it badly.
I got it long ago.
....and obviously, you threw it away long ago. Sorry, but this isn't long
ago. Pull your head out of your ***** and start living in today, which means
you have to start earning respect all over again, just as the rest of us have
to do just about every day.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 03:35:26 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now you have none.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 04:57:20 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now you have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 09:50:31 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<KOJ1d.60396$Np2.55606@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now you have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
That you are not respercted as a person nor as a debator. I though
that it was rather clear, given the context.
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
The election is still almost 2 months away, and both Bush and Kerry
are in an almost statistical dead heat. The people that are currently
projecting a Bush win are the ardent Repugnicans like yourself.
For the good of our nation, even for at least the next generation, I
am hoping that Bush loses, badly. And that the Rupublicans lose their
races badly. They have shown what they will do if given a free hand,
and that is to dismantle our Constitution and our freedoms and
liberties that we have worked so hard since WWII to secure. Their
goal is not to respect others and their constituents, it is to force
their ideas and beliefs on the nation at large, and the world if their
can. They are not for freedom and liberty, they are for tyranny and a
theocracy.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
15 Sep 2004 10:30:38 AM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141850.70479409@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<KOJ1d.60396$Np2.55606@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized
delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now you
have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
That you are not respercted as a person nor as a debator. I though
that it was rather clear, given the context.
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
The election is still almost 2 months away, and both Bush and Kerry
are in an almost statistical dead heat. The people that are currently
projecting a Bush win are the ardent Repugnicans like yourself.
For the good of our nation, even for at least the next generation, I
am hoping that Bush loses, badly. And that the Rupublicans lose their
races badly.
The people are realizing the Dems are for same-sex marriage and for abortion
on demand.
The people are more in line with republican values.
They have shown what they will do if given a free hand,
and that is to dismantle our Constitution and our freedoms and
liberties that we have worked so hard since WWII to secure. Their
goal is not to respect others and their constituents, it is to force
their ideas and beliefs on the nation at large, and the world if their
can. They are not for freedom and liberty, they are for tyranny and a
theocracy.
How so?
The NASD is against justice.
That occurred during the Clinton administration.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004
To the White House?
Personally, I am not so concerned about who is President as long as the
President is for our people and not only for himself or only special
interests without regard for others.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
15 Sep 2004 01:33:59 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<ilY1d.136655$0o5.93953@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141850.70479409@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<KOJ1d.60396$Np2.55606@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized
delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now you
have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
That you are not respercted as a person nor as a debator. I though
that it was rather clear, given the context.
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
The election is still almost 2 months away, and both Bush and Kerry
are in an almost statistical dead heat. The people that are currently
projecting a Bush win are the ardent Repugnicans like yourself.
For the good of our nation, even for at least the next generation, I
am hoping that Bush loses, badly. And that the Rupublicans lose their
races badly.
The people are realizing the Dems are for same-sex marriage and for abortion
on demand.
Which respect the dignity and freedom of others, as well as the
equality of everyone. I have yet to see even one good reason to deny
homosexuals the same right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice as heterosexuals have. Therefore, that denial amount to
prejudice and bigotry, and all such laws should be struck from the
legal codes.
The people are more in line with republican values.
If that was true, then there would not be a statistical dead heat.
So, you are saying that people are for prejudice, bigotry,
dismantleing the Constitution, restriction and voiding of rights,
denial of rights to certain groups of citizens for no good reason, and
other methods of denying rights and liberties to US citizens? Because
that is what the Republican party has been working towards, as is
evident from the last 4 years.
They have shown what they will do if given a free hand,
and that is to dismantle our Constitution and our freedoms and
liberties that we have worked so hard since WWII to secure. Their
goal is not to respect others and their constituents, it is to force
their ideas and beliefs on the nation at large, and the world if their
can. They are not for freedom and liberty, they are for tyranny and a
theocracy.
How so?
"Faith Based" Initiative, racial profiling, religious profiling,
trying to restrict abortions, especially to women that need them for
medical reasons, trying to write bigotry into the Constitution by
denying homosexuals the right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice, the unnecessary war in Iraq, squandering a budget surplus and
turning it into a massive deficit, CAPPS, trying to set up an national
ID progarm, encouraging churches to break the law and endorse him to
their congregations, attempts to remove various checks on the powers
of the executive branch, authorization of "black bag" searches,
failure to obey the law with respect to Freedom of Information Act
requests, failure to expidite requests under the same laws after being
ordered to by the courts, harrassment of actvists and peaceful
protesters, denial of citizens their legal rights, harrassment of
legal immigrants, etc. The list goes on.
The NASD is against justice.
Who? I am talking about the fact that the Republicans care nothing
abou the people or for freedom, and desire to change the USA into a
theocracy like in the Middle East, only "Christian" (the far right
extremist type) instead of Muslim.
That occurred during the Clinton administration.
In almost every aspect you can name, the Clinton administration was
expodentially better than the Bush administration. The Republicans
were determined to take Clinton down, and all they could get on him
was penny ante stuff. If the Democrats did the same digging and
malicious campaigning against Bush as the Republicans did against
Clinton, Bush would have been impeached long ago.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004
To the White House?
No, back to Texas. We need to remove him from the White House, and
every other political office. That way, he will not cause more
lasting harm to the country.
Personally, I am not so concerned about who is President as long as the
President is for our people and not only for himself or only special
interests without regard for others.
Well, that leaves Bush out. All he has done in the last four years is
to work for himself and for big business and far right special
interest groups. That is one of the main reasons that I was against
him four years ago, and I am against him now. He cares nothing for
the people.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004,
SO LET'S SHOW
HIM THE DOOR
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
15 Sep 2004 04:18:13 PM |
|
|
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409151033.2847e855@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<ilY1d.136655$0o5.93953@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141850.70479409@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<KOJ1d.60396$Np2.55606@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized
delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a
little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now
you
have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
That you are not respercted as a person nor as a debator. I though
that it was rather clear, given the context.
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
The election is still almost 2 months away, and both Bush and Kerry
are in an almost statistical dead heat. The people that are currently
projecting a Bush win are the ardent Repugnicans like yourself.
For the good of our nation, even for at least the next generation, I
am hoping that Bush loses, badly. And that the Rupublicans lose their
races badly.
The people are realizing the Dems are for same-sex marriage and for
abortion
on demand.
Which respect the dignity and freedom of others, as well as the
equality of everyone.
Another lie from you.
I have yet to see even one good reason to deny
homosexuals the same right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice as heterosexuals have.
I do.
Therefore, that denial amount to
prejudice and bigotry, and all such laws should be struck from the
legal codes.
Another lie.
The people are more in line with republican values.
If that was true, then there would not be a statistical dead heat.
Dead heat?
Like you?
Dead wood.
So, you are saying that people are for prejudice, bigotry,
dismantleing the Constitution, restriction and voiding of rights,
denial of rights to certain groups of citizens for no good reason,
Which is Pro-Choice and same sex marriage amongst other things.
and
other methods of denying rights and liberties to US citizens? Because
that is what the Republican party has been working towards, as is
evident from the last 4 years.
No rights are being denied by Pro-Lifres or by people who are against
same-sex marriage and no bigotry is being practiced by Pro-Lifres or by
people who are against same-sex marriage.
They have shown what they will do if given a free hand,
and that is to dismantle our Constitution and our freedoms and
liberties that we have worked so hard since WWII to secure. Their
goal is not to respect others and their constituents, it is to force
their ideas and beliefs on the nation at large, and the world if their
can. They are not for freedom and liberty, they are for tyranny and a
theocracy.
How so?
"Faith Based" Initiative, racial profiling, religious profiling,
trying to restrict abortions, especially to women that need them for
medical reasons, trying to write bigotry into the Constitution by
denying homosexuals the right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice, the unnecessary war in Iraq, squandering a budget surplus and
turning it into a massive deficit, CAPPS, trying to set up an national
ID progarm, encouraging churches to break the law and endorse him to
their congregations, attempts to remove various checks on the powers
of the executive branch, authorization of "black bag" searches,
failure to obey the law with respect to Freedom of Information Act
requests, failure to expidite requests under the same laws after being
ordered to by the courts, harrassment of actvists and peaceful
protesters, denial of citizens their legal rights, harrassment of
legal immigrants, etc. The list goes on.
I do not like to read what you write when it goes on too long.
I imagine you lied again, but I did not even read it all.
The NASD is against justice.
Who? I am talking about the fact that the Republicans care nothing
abou the people or for freedom, and desire to change the USA into a
theocracy like in the Middle East, only "Christian" (the far right
extremist type) instead of Muslim.
I am talking about the USA.
That occurred during the Clinton administration.
In almost every aspect you can name, the Clinton administration was
expodentially better than the Bush administration. The Republicans
were determined to take Clinton down, and all they could get on him
was penny ante stuff. If the Democrats did the same digging and
malicious campaigning against Bush as the Republicans did against
Clinton, Bush would have been impeached long ago.
Nah.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004
To the White House?
No, back to Texas. We need to remove him from the White House, and
every other political office. That way, he will not cause more
lasting harm to the country.
He goes to Texas when he wants to.
You against allowing him liberty in his own naiton?
Personally, I am not so concerned about who is President as long as the
President is for our people and not only for himself or only special
interests without regard for others.
Well, that leaves Bush out.
How so?
You leave so many out with your hypocritical ideas.
All he has done in the last four years is
to work for himself and for big business and far right special
interest groups. That is one of the main reasons that I was against
him four years ago, and I am against him now. He cares nothing for
the people.
You so sure?
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004,
SO LET'S SHOW
HIM THE DOOR
He knows where the door is.
Why do you want to show him?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
16 Sep 2004 02:46:01 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message news:<br12d.137836$0o5.104082@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409151033.2847e855@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<ilY1d.136655$0o5.93953@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141850.70479409@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<KOJ1d.60396$Np2.55606@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:c30d43e8.0409141235.73ef4944@posting.google.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:<21C1d.59687$Np2.7575@bignews4.bellsouth.net>...
"somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:i7idk094j6lgflgu7e4d68cmtf87vkukil@4ax.com...
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized
delusions
of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our
species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a
little
respect.
You trying to tell me how to be or what to do again?
I do not need to earn respect.
I got it long ago.
And, like Bush, you squandered it and threw it all away, so now
you
have
none.
What is that supposed to mean?
That you are not respercted as a person nor as a debator. I though
that it was rather clear, given the context.
Is that why Bush is preojected to win re-election?
The election is still almost 2 months away, and both Bush and Kerry
are in an almost statistical dead heat. The people that are currently
projecting a Bush win are the ardent Repugnicans like yourself.
For the good of our nation, even for at least the next generation, I
am hoping that Bush loses, badly. And that the Rupublicans lose their
races badly.
The people are realizing the Dems are for same-sex marriage and for
abortion
on demand.
Which respect the dignity and freedom of others, as well as the
equality of everyone.
Another lie from you.
Nope. The clear and unadulterate truth.
I have yet to see even one good reason to deny
homosexuals the same right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice as heterosexuals have.
I do.
But you cannot produce it.
Therefore, that denial amount to
prejudice and bigotry, and all such laws should be struck from the
legal codes.
Another lie.
Again. that is not a lie. It is an example of denying people equal
legal rights because they happen to belong to a certain class of
people, which is the very definition of prejudice. In this case,
homosexuals are being denied the right to marry the consenting adult
of their choice and thus enjoy the same guarentees and rights that
every heterosexual married couple enjoys. Homosexuals are being
denied a large body of rights simply because they are homosexual.
Therefore, the law is prejudiced against them, and there is no
instance of their loosing these rights due to due process.
The people are more in line with republican values.
If that was true, then there would not be a statistical dead heat.
Dead heat?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/06/presidential.poll/index.html
"Among registered voters in the most recent poll, Bush and Kerry were
about even -- 49 percent to 48 percent respectively -- with a margin
of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points."
Yes, a dead heat. The difference in their percentages is less than
the margin of error.
Like you?
Dead wood.
"Dead Wood" describes what is inside your head.
So, you are saying that people are for prejudice, bigotry,
dismantleing the Constitution, restriction and voiding of rights,
denial of rights to certain groups of citizens for no good reason,
Which is Pro-Choice and same sex marriage amongst other things.
Actually, Pro-choice and same sex marriages are examples of GRANTING
rights to citizens, and withholding these rights are examples of what
I am talking about.
and
other methods of denying rights and liberties to US citizens? Because
that is what the Republican party has been working towards, as is
evident from the last 4 years.
No rights are being denied by Pro-Lifres or by people who are against
same-sex marriage and no bigotry is being practiced by Pro-Lifres or by
people who are against same-sex marriage.
Rather confused statement that you made. However, as I understand
what you are trying to say, here is my reply.
Anti-choice advocates are denying women the right to control their own
bodies. Nobody is required to let another use their body against
their will. If they do, this is called assault, and the victim, the
pregnant woman in this case, is allowed to use any reasonable means
available to stop the assailant from using her body. This includes
killing the assailant if that is what it takes. And it does not
matter that she "changes her mind later". A couple could be having
sex, and have even progressed to penetration. However, if one person
changes his or her mind, and tells the partner to stop, the partner
must stop, or it changes from sex to rape, and is thus prosecutable.
Also, nobody is required to allow another person to use their body or
any part of it, even if that use is require to keep the other person
alive. And a person has complete control of what medical services
that they choose to avail themselves of, or not avail themselves of,
for any medical condition.
And as far as same sex marriages, rights are very much being denied.
Homosexuals are being the denied the right to marry the consenting
adult of his or her choice. They are also being denied the myriad of
rights the every married couple enjoys, because they are not allowed
to get married. This includes things like hospital visitation,
inheritance, insurance, custody of any children, and a thousand other
things. That is just plain bigotry and prejudice written into the
law.
Therefore, both of your points are false.
They have shown what they will do if given a free hand,
and that is to dismantle our Constitution and our freedoms and
liberties that we have worked so hard since WWII to secure. Their
goal is not to respect others and their constituents, it is to force
their ideas and beliefs on the nation at large, and the world if their
can. They are not for freedom and liberty, they are for tyranny and a
theocracy.
How so?
"Faith Based" Initiative, racial profiling, religious profiling,
trying to restrict abortions, especially to women that need them for
medical reasons, trying to write bigotry into the Constitution by
denying homosexuals the right to marry the consenting adult of their
choice, the unnecessary war in Iraq, squandering a budget surplus and
turning it into a massive deficit, CAPPS, trying to set up an national
ID progarm, encouraging churches to break the law and endorse him to
their congregations, attempts to remove various checks on the powers
of the executive branch, authorization of "black bag" searches,
failure to obey the law with respect to Freedom of Information Act
requests, failure to expidite requests under the same laws after being
ordered to by the courts, harrassment of actvists and peaceful
protesters, denial of citizens their legal rights, harrassment of
legal immigrants, etc. The list goes on.
I do not like to read what you write when it goes on too long.
And that is not even a complete list. You can thank Bush and the
Republicans for its lengh.
I imagine you lied again, but I did not even read it all.
Nope. Every single item was in the news since late January 2001.
The NASD is against justice.
Who? I am talking about the fact that the Republicans care nothing
abou the people or for freedom, and desire to change the USA into a
theocracy like in the Middle East, only "Christian" (the far right
extremist type) instead of Muslim.
I am talking about the USA.
So am I.
That occurred during the Clinton administration.
In almost every aspect you can name, the Clinton administration was
expodentially better than the Bush administration. The Republicans
were determined to take Clinton down, and all they could get on him
was penny ante stuff. If the Democrats did the same digging and
malicious campaigning against Bush as the Republicans did against
Clinton, Bush would have been impeached long ago.
Nah.
Yes, he would have been. The Democrats are just not as malicious as
the republicans.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004
To the White House?
No, back to Texas. We need to remove him from the White House, and
every other political office. That way, he will not cause more
lasting harm to the country.
He goes to Texas when he wants to.
And we need to throw him out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington D.C.
as soon as possible, so he does not have a reason to return to the
Nation's Capital.
You against allowing him liberty in his own naiton?
I am against him being President.
Personally, I am not so concerned about who is President as long as the
President is for our people and not only for himself or only special
interests without regard for others.
Well, that leaves Bush out.
How so?
Read what I wrote next.
You leave so many out with your hypocritical ideas.
Just means that you cannot read, since I explain it in the next
sentence.
You are a fine one to talk. You leave everything out of your
hypocritical ideas, including logic, reason, sense, compassion, and
intelligence.
All he has done in the last four years is
to work for himself and for big business and far right special
interest groups. That is one of the main reasons that I was against
him four years ago, and I am against him now. He cares nothing for
the people.
You so sure?
Yes.
BUSH MUST GO
IN 2004,
SO LET'S SHOW
HIM THE DOOR
He knows where the door is.
Why do you want to show him?
You really need to work on your idioms. "Showing someone the door" is
an euphamism for throwing someone out. That idiom has been around for
at least a century.
All you are doing in your post is showing that you are an idiot, and
bigotted to boot. You are your own worst enemy.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 05:37:41 AM |
|
|
somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
Wouldn't be prudent. He'd have to be responsible for his own actions. Ain't
gonna happen. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 08:07:03 AM |
|
|
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szku0u1qgp6.fsf@fnord.io.com...
somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
Wouldn't be prudent. He'd have to be responsible for his own actions.
You think Pro-Choicers are being responsible?
Ain't
gonna happen. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero. |
14 Sep 2004 01:30:00 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Patrick Lee Humphrey" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szku0u1qgp6.fsf@fnord.io.com...
somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:37 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:chvfg0$3m9$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Johnny <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
Pro-Choicers =
Conspirators to Kill Human Infants in Utero.
paranoia: a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of
persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
I am not afraid of you that attack the weakest members of our species.
Stop being such an *****, and you might earn yourself a little
respect.
Wouldn't be prudent. He'd have to be responsible for his own actions.
You think Pro-Choicers are being responsible?
They're being more responsible, in general, than one psychotic welfare leech
(that's you, in case you can't figure out the big words) in South Carolina.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|