Science > Abortion > coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated
| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
06 Sep 2004 07:17:58 PM |
| Object: |
coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
.
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
07 Sep 2004 04:59:37 AM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns955CCE7B3E5A8keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
As most can see, and from reading other replies, the general consensus
is.."James has issues"
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
It is obvious now, more than ever, that James is so consumed with
hate, bitterness, and jealousy that I choose not to engage in any
debate or conversation with him, other than to correct his lies...he
has now completely flipped and can't handle the fact he recieves
little or no attention.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
07 Sep 2004 09:05:32 AM |
|
|
(osprey) wrote in
news:8912d58d.0409070159.3bebace9@posting.google.com:
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
proof that you did:
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" <> replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
07 Sep 2004 10:20:16 AM |
|
|
(osprey) wrote in message news:<8912d58d.0409070159.3bebace9@posting.google.com>...
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns955CCE7B3E5A8keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
"Osprey" < > wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" < > replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
As most can see, and from reading other replies, the general consensus
is.."James has issues"
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
Sure you did.
ausstu said "Since 1956 no sitting president who had less than 50%
support after February was reelected. I believe the support for Bush
is weak even though he has a temporary bounce."
To which you replied, "You are believing very foolishly, you should be
careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
Now, since ausstu was talking about SITTING PRESIDENTS when you
replied with your Mondale statement, the logical conclusion is that
you thought Mondale was a president.
Of course, you're not very logical, nor are you very bright, and in
order to try and save what's left of your shredded credibility, you
are now lying about what you said. Your words are above Asspry, no
matter how hard you try and lie about what you wrote, what you wrote
remains the same.
It is obvious now, more than ever, that James is so consumed with
hate, bitterness, and jealousy that I choose not to engage in any
debate or conversation with him,
More lies, eh?
other than to correct his lies...he
has now completely flipped and can't handle the fact he recieves
little or no attention.
Actually, it appears that you are the one who has flipped after your
intelligence was just *****-slapped all over the newsgroup.
Now, instead of whining, why don't you use your time more wisely by
reading a book so don't post something as stupid as this in the
future? This will also eliminate your need to lie about what you
wrote when others point out the blatant stupidity in your posts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
13 Sep 2004 06:41:25 PM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b41296b4.0409070720.bc98921@posting.google.com...
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0409070159.3bebace9@posting.google.com>...
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns955CCE7B3E5A8keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be
careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
As most can see, and from reading other replies, the general consensus
is.."James has issues"
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
Sure you did.
ausstu said "Since 1956 no sitting president who had less than 50%
support after February was reelected. I believe the support for Bush
is weak even though he has a temporary bounce."
To which you replied, "You are believing very foolishly, you should be
careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
Now, since ausstu was talking about SITTING PRESIDENTS when you
replied with your Mondale statement, the logical conclusion is that
you thought Mondale was a president.
Of course, you're not very logical, nor are you very bright, and in
order to try and save what's left of your shredded credibility, you
are now lying about what you said. Your words are above Asspry, no
matter how hard you try and lie about what you wrote, what you wrote
remains the same.
Actually, on this one I don't believe Assprey meant what he said. We all
know that he has a habit of just spouting off the latest load of right-wing
***** without actually thinking for himself.
Truth be told, he probably just pulled a piece of random ***** out of his *****
and responded with it, the subject or context be damned.
This time, though, it showed him to be a dumbass, rather than display his
usual liar persona. I'm certain he'll be back on track in no time.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
14 Sep 2004 10:01:28 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<Feq1d.460$aZ1.188@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b41296b4.0409070720.bc98921@posting.google.com...
noneedtoknow@mail.com (osprey) wrote in message
news:<8912d58d.0409070159.3bebace9@posting.google.com>...
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns955CCE7B3E5A8keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be
careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
As most can see, and from reading other replies, the general consensus
is.."James has issues"
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
Sure you did.
ausstu said "Since 1956 no sitting president who had less than 50%
support after February was reelected. I believe the support for Bush
is weak even though he has a temporary bounce."
To which you replied, "You are believing very foolishly, you should be
careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
Now, since ausstu was talking about SITTING PRESIDENTS when you
replied with your Mondale statement, the logical conclusion is that
you thought Mondale was a president.
Of course, you're not very logical, nor are you very bright, and in
order to try and save what's left of your shredded credibility, you
are now lying about what you said. Your words are above Asspry, no
matter how hard you try and lie about what you wrote, what you wrote
remains the same.
Actually, on this one I don't believe Assprey meant what he said.
He claims to have straight A's in English class and professes to be
smarter than most people here. How could someone like that possibly
not mean what they've written? ;) (take note that I'm not
disagreeing with you here, but instead I'm finding great pleasure in
watching Asspry make an ***** of himself while he gets salt rubbed into
the gaping sore that was once his credibility).
We all
know that he has a habit of just spouting off the latest load of right-wing
***** without actually thinking for himself.
Truth be told, he probably just pulled a piece of random ***** out of his *****
and responded with it, the subject or context be damned.
I agree with you completely. But, it sure is fun to be able to use
Asspry's tactics on him. :)
This time, though, it showed him to be a dumbass, rather than display his
usual liar persona. I'm certain he'll be back on track in no time.
As evidenced by his most recent postings.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: coward bobby thinks walter mondale was president of the united stated |
07 Sep 2004 05:14:40 AM |
|
|
On 7 Sep 2004 02:59:37 -0700, (osprey) wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message news:<Xns955CCE7B3E5A8keegannycaprrcom@130.133.1.4>...
"Osprey" < > wrote in news:bOudnTGSd5vaYKHcRVn-
vQ@comcast.com:
Nowhere was that statement ever saying that Mondale was a president.
"ausstu" <ausstu@primus.com.au> wrote in message
news:85667340.0409041613.197e6164@posting.google.com..."Since 1956 no
sitting president who had less than 50% support after February was
reelected. I believe the support for Bush is weak even though he has a
temporary bounce."
"Osprey" < > replies in news:l--dnTZedKI_x6fcRVn-
pA@comcast.com: " You are believing very foolishly, you should be careful.
Remember, Mondale had a huge lead and he lost."
heh.
As most can see, and from reading other replies, the general consensus
is.."James has issues"
As anyone can plainly see, nowhere did I say Mondale was ever the U.S.
president.
It is obvious now, more than ever, that James...
Speak to him about your problem. I am sure Keegan has a lending ear.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
