| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"David W. Barnes" |
| Date: |
25 Nov 2005 06:20:52 PM |
| Object: |
Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
As usual, Osprey has been shooting his mouth off about things he knows
nothing about. He hopes to claim the economy is, somehow, doing as
well under Bush as Clinton. (He used to claim it is better under Bush,
but even HE knows that will never sell at this point.)
According to public opinion polls, most Americans feel the U.S. economy
has been moving in the wrong direction. Indeed, an analysis of several
important economic indicators shows they're right.
Rather than accepting some Right Wing hated filled guards opinion,
consider the opinions of economists Robert D. Atkinson and Julie Hutto.
As they put it: "In apples-to-apples comparisons of annualized data,
these indicators of the country's economic well-being show mostly
negative change during President George W. Bush's administration,
compared to mostly positive change during President Bill Clinton's
administration."
<http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=107&subsecID=295&content
ID=252964>
.
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
01 Dec 2005 11:31:05 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:dmoibm$555$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer at
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
I'm sure you can afford to trade your wife in, should she get
fat...
I don't have a wife..... My lady and I stay together by choice,
not law, or fear of financial consequences....
Easy out. No commitment.
No surprise.
The surprise is there's a woman stupid enough to stay with
Nevermore
WITHOUT getting a lock on a big chunk of the money he TELLS us he
has...
1) It's his mother
2) She's supporting him
3) It's his sister
4) She's desperate
5) She's inflatable
A "gem" of a response. :o)))))))) for # 5.
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
02 Dec 2005 12:17:17 AM |
|
|
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message news:Xns971FDAEEBCAAASD@70.169.32.36...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:dmoibm$555$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer at
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
I'm sure you can afford to trade your wife in, should she get
fat...
I don't have a wife..... My lady and I stay together by choice,
not law, or fear of financial consequences....
Easy out. No commitment.
No surprise.
The surprise is there's a woman stupid enough to stay with
Nevermore
WITHOUT getting a lock on a big chunk of the money he TELLS us he
has...
1) It's his mother
2) She's supporting him
3) It's his sister
4) She's desperate
5) She's inflatable
A "gem" of a response. :o)))))))) for # 5.
And about as old as most natural gems too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
02 Dec 2005 12:16:21 AM |
|
|
"shrikeback" <hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:MpidneP9beU6eBLeRVn-sg@comcast.com:
"BOB" <sd@sd.net> wrote in message
news:Xns971FDAEEBCAAASD@70.169.32.36...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:dmoibm$555$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer at
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
Paul Duca <p.duca@comcast.net>
I'm sure you can afford to trade your wife in, should she get
fat...
I don't have a wife..... My lady and I stay together by choice,
not law, or fear of financial consequences....
Easy out. No commitment.
No surprise.
The surprise is there's a woman stupid enough to stay with
Nevermore
WITHOUT getting a lock on a big chunk of the money he TELLS us he
has...
1) It's his mother
2) She's supporting him
3) It's his sister
4) She's desperate
5) She's inflatable
A "gem" of a response. :o)))))))) for # 5.
And about as old as most natural gems too!
Some things just get better with age.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 08:38:14 PM |
|
|
Paul Duca wrote:
in article bs7po1979s8fsm414bjonvc7r8v5kco56a@4ax.com, nevermore at
stevencanyon@y***hoo.com wrote on 11/29/05 2:15 PM:
On 29 Nov 2005 09:41:12 -0800, (Ray Fischer)
wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from
young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain?
Watching Bubba tell the country he's been fooling around on
Hillary..... <LOL> ...with a fat girl, yet..... I'll bet that
did wonders for her self esteem.....
I'm sure you can afford to trade your wife in, should she get fat...
Assumes facts not in evidence, there has been no evidence provided that
loser steve even has a girlfriend, let alone a wife.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 05:57:50 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:38:14 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Paul Duca wrote:
in article bs7po1979s8fsm414bjonvc7r8v5kco56a@4ax.com, nevermore at
stevencanyon@y***hoo.com wrote on 11/29/05 2:15 PM:
On 29 Nov 2005 09:41:12 -0800, (Ray Fischer)
wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from
young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain?
Watching Bubba tell the country he's been fooling around on
Hillary..... <LOL> ...with a fat girl, yet..... I'll bet that
did wonders for her self esteem.....
I'm sure you can afford to trade your wife in, should she get fat...
Assumes facts not in evidence, there has been no evidence provided that
loser steve even has a girlfriend, let alone a wife.
You think I worry about you not having evidence concerning my life?
<LOL> Gosh... it must be terrible for you leftists to be *that*
concerned about other people's opinions.....
--
Steve
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 11:19:46 PM |
|
|
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 09:41:12 -0800, (Ray Fischer)
wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain?
Watching Bubba tell the country he's been fooling around on
Hillary..... <LOL> ...with a fat girl, yet..... I'll bet that
did wonders for her self esteem.....
Political fanatic willing to destroy America for political gain.
I'd guess you also laugh at seeing animals tortured.
only you leftists...
As opposed to you fascists?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 05:57:51 AM |
|
|
On 29 Nov 2005 21:19:46 -0800, (Ray Fischer)
wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 09:41:12 -0800, (Ray Fischer)
wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain?
Watching Bubba tell the country he's been fooling around on
Hillary..... <LOL> ...with a fat girl, yet..... I'll bet that
did wonders for her self esteem.....
Political fanatic willing to destroy America for political gain.
So why don't you stop?
I'd guess you also laugh at seeing animals tortured.
only you leftists...
As opposed to you fascists?
--
Steve
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
01 Dec 2005 12:51:11 AM |
|
|
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer)
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer)
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain?
Watching Bubba tell the country he's been fooling around on
Hillary..... <LOL> ...with a fat girl, yet..... I'll bet that
did wonders for her self esteem.....
Political fanatic willing to destroy America for political gain.
So why don't you stop?
Stop what? Embarrasing you?
I'd guess you also laugh at seeing animals tortured.
only you leftists...
As opposed to you fascists?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 12:43:42 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain? I'd guess you also laugh at seeing animals tortured.
No doubt about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 01:45:07 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:43:42 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
nevermore <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, "David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com>
wrote:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell. Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Why shouldn't people get a good laugh at things that are so funny?
What was funny? Political fanatics willing to destroy America for
political gain? I'd guess you also laugh at seeing animals tortured.
No doubt about it.
Oh yeah, I beat puppies and kittens with a big stick, poison
squirrels, and shoot and robins and bluebirds with a pellet gun......
<LOL> You pathetic loons actually seem to think that having you
think ill of me hurts my feelings, don't you?
Keeryst, I can't imagine how vulnerable you must be to others'
criticisms, to actually believe that everybody else cares what you
think of them.... but then, one must have a pretty poor self-image to
be a leftist in the first place....
--
Steve
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 07:51:13 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, in alt.atheism
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
<281120051727107353%dbarnes@aol.com>:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell.
Yep, but it's not my business.
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 09:32:14 PM |
|
|
In article <jvcno1leecl4334vt33f8hc93dqa95g4pd@4ax.com>, David Jensen
<david@dajensen-family.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, in alt.atheism
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
<281120051727107353%dbarnes@aol.com>:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com>
wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from
young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell.
Yep, but it's not my business.
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 09:40:10 PM |
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <jvcno1leecl4334vt33f8hc93dqa95g4pd@4ax.com>, David Jensen
<david@dajensen-family.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, in alt.atheism
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
<281120051727107353%dbarnes@aol.com>:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com>
wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several, long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs from
young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell.
Yep, but it's not my business.
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Clinton was the boss. Would you tolerate him borrowing money or
accepting other special favors from "consenting adults?"
Whey are you oblivious?
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 11:19:08 PM |
|
|
In article <1133235610.501562.172110@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <jvcno1leecl4334vt33f8hc93dqa95g4pd@4ax.com>, David Jensen
<david@dajensen-family.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:27:10 GMT, in alt.atheism
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
<281120051727107353%dbarnes@aol.com>:
In article <1133197429.806224.108180@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Kate O'Flaherty <2.8.1855@safe-mail.net> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
In article <1vvjo1pn6ho6r2qc82gtq6ueg2tmi4a7i7@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:31:02 -0500, Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com>
wrote:
Either way, he was getting a ***** in my White House instead
of
tending
to
his duties.
Getting a ***** for a couple of minutes compared to several,
long
vacations that the average worker isn't privy to having, is
nothing.
???? He was elected to protect this country, not get blow jobs
from
young
girls.
She was a consulting adult, you *****. And if you are suggestion
Presidents shouldn't have sex while in office, you must be some Right
Wing religious *****.
It's not okay for a president to have an affair while in office; but
it's okay to several extended vacations and kill thousands of people
for nothing.
Hillary should have been pissed as hell.
Yep, but it's not my business.
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help.
According to "Monica" that didn't happen here. In fact, she threw
herself on him. Why believe she was taken advantage of?
Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
I don't know, but they don't. I don't believe he took advantage of
her. He was a scoundrel, but nothing more.
Clinton was the boss. Would you tolerate him borrowing money or
accepting other special favors from "consenting adults?"
Boss or not, it appears that they both consented and were more than
capable of making that decision.
Whey are you oblivious?
I'm not. I just have trouble accepting the idea that anyone really
feels this is important. Clinton did a great job. Bush is responsible
for the deaths of hundreds of thousands, the economy is weak and the
deficit deep, he tends to the wealthy at the expense of the needy. But
I am supposed to judge Clinton because he received a ***** from a
consenting adult? I don't think so.
All people are hypocrites, to a certain degree. But the degree of
hypocrisy that goes on with those who find Bush's acts acceptable but
Clinton's act unacceptable is shocking. Clinton could get elected
again today. And ***** or not, he was a great president while Bush
is despicable.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 10:31:09 PM |
|
|
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault. Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Cross" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 10:37:51 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl. She was a student-intern.
If Sandra Day O'Conner pulled the same stunt with a Supreme Court
Intern, you bet your britches the same principle would apply.
TCross
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 11:12:25 PM |
|
|
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
And women don't want to give up any power.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
And, of course, it's always the women who need to be protected?
Your sexism is showing.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
Too far to travel.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government.
But he was not her boss and had no ability to affect her job.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
28 Nov 2005 11:09:14 PM |
|
|
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl. She was a student-intern.
If Sandra Day O'Conner pulled the same stunt with a Supreme Court
Intern, you bet your britches the same principle would apply.
TCross
NO ONE *DIED* WHEN CLINTON LIED, your commander in chimp has killed
thousands so far with *HIS* lies. Come on, for years you RRRwingnuts
have been saying "it wasn't the sex it was the lies". That was *YOUR*
lie because you swallow every lie the chimp spouts by lying yourself or
condoning and supporting his lies. Bush *IS* everything you RRRwingnuts
accused but couldn't prove Clinton of.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate OFlaherty" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 03:54:38 AM |
|
|
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 07:58:12 AM |
|
|
Kate O'Flaherty wrote:
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 08:45:14 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Kate O'Flaherty wrote:
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
....and Bubba was unable to resist the "come-ons" from a fat girl....
--
Steve
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 09:49:46 PM |
|
|
"nevermore" <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote in message
news:i3qoo1lp1c9jujahg6pibnrieb3klbhook@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Kate O'Flaherty wrote:
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
...and Bubba was unable to resist the "come-ons" from a fat girl....
That's the real embarrassment. She wasn't even all that attractive.
This is the POTUS that we're talking about, fer chrissake.
That Administration most assuredly was not Camelot II.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 05:57:47 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:49:46 -0800, "shrikeback"
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"nevermore" <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote in message
news:i3qoo1lp1c9jujahg6pibnrieb3klbhook@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Kate O'Flaherty wrote:
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
...and Bubba was unable to resist the "come-ons" from a fat girl....
That's the real embarrassment. She wasn't even all that attractive.
This is the POTUS that we're talking about, fer chrissake.
That Administration most assuredly was not Camelot II.
At least Kennedy went after nice looking bimbos.... I've seen
pictures of "Fiddle" and "Faddle," his two favorites ***** sockets.
--
Steve
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 08:09:44 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
Kate O'Flaherty wrote:
Terry Cross wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Terry Cross <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:
David W. Barnes wrote:
David Jensen
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in
Everyone else should have
found something better to think about. (Michael Jackson?)
Missing white women.
LOL! Yeah.
As a shareholder in this corporation, I get a little miffed when I
discover that the top executive is using his power and privilege to
molest the young, low-paid help. Most universities and corporations
have rules about that, and so does the Pentagon. Why not the
Whitehouse?
Ah yes, the assumption that it's always the man's fault.
Unequal power is the problem.
Women are
always the victims, always the ones taken advantage of, always the
ones who need to be protected.
The powerless need protection, the powerful need to be constrained.
So Miss Lewinsky was the "poor little victim"? She got caught up in the
ideal of being with the president of the United States, and in terms,
Clinton did act inappropriatelty--but his sex life was not of interest
to me. They were consenting adults at the time relations began--who
bloody well cares?! If GWB pulled a stunt like that I'd be on his
"moral" ***** like syrup is on pancakes, because then he'd be shown,
again, as a lying hypcrite. And I'll bet he's paid handsome sums to
hide his sexual indiscretions--he knows the name of the game, and you
do, too.
Equal rights is dead because women don't want equal responsibility.
There are some of us who take our "equal responsibilities" very
seriously.
I invite you to shout that slogan on the streets of Memphis.
I don't need to.
Clinton was the boss.
No, he wasn't.
Officially and functionally, Clinton was the top executive of the
Exeecutive Branch of the US Government. He had hire and fire power
over the girl.
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
She once said that she was out to "earn her presidential kneepads"
--
"'I’m not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I’m concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 09:25:37 PM |
|
|
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that. Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway? But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 10:04:02 PM |
|
|
In article <g6-dnRNQvI_XgRDeRVn-tA@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that.
I guess that is why he ran for President instead.
Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway?
Apparently the Republicans.
But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
Or those murders he was responsible for, right whack job?
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
29 Nov 2005 11:21:27 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:291120052004024856%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <g6-dnRNQvI_XgRDeRVn-tA@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that.
I guess that is why he ran for President instead.
Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway?
Apparently the Republicans.
But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
Or those murders he was responsible for, right whack job?
Did I say anything about that? Hmm, let me think. No, I didn't.
What I said was he sold a few pardons. That isn't even controversial.
It's public record. It's obvious that's what happened, though nothing
illegal was neccesarily done. Ethical is a different question. Come
on, Party-line Apparatchik. Even Bill Maher thought it was sleazy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 09:47:39 PM |
|
|
In article <z_6dnRhyXsA7qxDenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:291120052004024856%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <g6-dnRNQvI_XgRDeRVn-tA@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that.
I guess that is why he ran for President instead.
Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway?
Apparently the Republicans.
But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
Or those murders he was responsible for, right whack job?
Did I say anything about that? Hmm, let me think. No, I didn't.
What I said was he sold a few pardons. That isn't even controversial.
It's public record. It's obvious that's what happened, though nothing
illegal was neccesarily done. Ethical is a different question. Come
on, Party-line Apparatchik. Even Bill Maher thought it was sleazy.
I'm still chuckling at the "Chestnut" line.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 09:30:07 AM |
|
|
shrikeback wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:291120052004024856%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <g6-dnRNQvI_XgRDeRVn-tA@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that.
I guess that is why he ran for President instead.
Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway?
Apparently the Republicans.
But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
Or those murders he was responsible for, right whack job?
Did I say anything about that? Hmm, let me think. No, I didn't.
You're inability to recognize that you're being ridiculed noted
What I said was he sold a few pardons. That isn't even controversial.
It's public record. It's obvious that's what happened, though nothing
You lie, it is not "a matter of public record" that he *SOLD* pardons.
He's been out of office for 5 years and he still owns you. Clinton's
pardons were less unethical / corrupt than the pardons 41 handed out to
cover his ***** for Iran/Contra.
illegal was neccesarily done. Ethical is a different question. Come
on, Party-line Apparatchik. Even Bill Maher thought it was sleazy.
Ah, yes, the great pundit Bill (libertarian) Maher. Who gives a *****
what "entertainers" say? You have no "there" there and none of it
excuses W from being a corrupt, power mad, vile creature.
.
|
|
|
| User: "shrikeback" |
|
| Title: Re: Economy has been moving in the wrong direction |
30 Nov 2005 11:19:16 AM |
|
|
"Mimi Cohen" <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote in message
news:_zjjf.9732$Wu.9234@fed1read05...
shrikeback wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:291120052004024856%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <g6-dnRNQvI_XgRDeRVn-tA@comcast.com>, shrikeback
<hewpiedawg@hotmail.com> wrote:
"2108 Dead, 22 since Hunter resolution" <zepp2108#2211finestplanet.com@>
wrote in message news:77ooo1hjbhsfrpfdu3d7k59a8424jgesvb@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:58:12 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
I am so sick and tired of this "girl" nonsense. She was an adult --a
young and stupid adult (like that's a crime)--when she consented to
giving that man a *****.
Funny how she's always said that *SHE* came on to him.
And Slick couldn't say "no"? What a moron! If he were the CEO
of a corporation I was on the board of, I'd lobby to have him fired for
that.
I guess that is why he ran for President instead.
Who needs sexual harassment lawsuits, anyway?
Apparently the Republicans.
But this
whole sexual harassment thing of Slick's doesn't compare to the
sale of a few first-rate pardons, eh?
Or those murders he was responsible for, right whack job?
Did I say anything about that? Hmm, let me think. No, I didn't.
You're inability to recognize that you're being ridiculed noted
You're inability to recognize that I did recognize the ridicule noted,
and this was my all-too-subdued response.
That means you currently have two moron points. Soon you
will have enough to get a big bag of M & Ms.
What I said was he sold a few pardons. That isn't even controversial.
It's public record. It's obvious that's what happened, though nothing
You lie, it is not "a matter of public record" that he *SOLD* pardons.
Okay: bartered, if you're going to be a semantic purist. Clinton bartered
a few pardons.
He's been out of office for 5 years and he still owns you.
He owns me? Haven't you heard of the emancipation proclamation?
Clinton's pardons were less unethical / corrupt than the pardons 41 handed
out to cover his ***** for Iran/Contra.
I don't know. Those were over a policy dispute with Congress. Clinton's
were just for personal gain, kind of like how Hillary made sure there
wouldn't
be a Universal Health Care system for a good long time, just so she could
sell short on some Aetna stocks.
illegal was neccesarily done. Ethical is a different question. Come
on, Party-line Apparatchik. Even Bill Maher thought it was sleazy.
Ah, yes, the great pundit Bill (libertarian) Maher.
He calls himself that because he favors legalizing drugs, prostitution, etc.
But he's just a liberal. And a big fan of Slick's too.
Who gives a ***** what "entertainers" say?
Politics _is_ just a branch of showbiz, after all.
You have no "there" there and none of it excuses W from being a corrupt,
power mad, vile creature
I wasn't discussing Turd W. Sandwich. I was discussing the
Giant Douchebag, and what surprises me is how much you
people think he's god, that's all. That doesn't mean I think
W is god.
.
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
