| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"james g. keegan jr." |
| Date: |
21 Jan 2005 10:00:13 AM |
| Object: |
Even less respected in the world |
Even less respected in the world
January 20, 2005 3:28 PM
During her confirmation hearing this week, Condi Rice acknowledged that
the U.S. government has some bridges to rebuild with the rest of the
world. On the day of George Bush’s re-inauguration, a new poll
commissioned by the BBC World Service helps demonstrate how much repair
work remains.
"Our research makes very clear that the re-election of President
Bush has further isolated America from the world," pollster Doug Miller
told The Guardian. "It also supports the view of some Americans that
unless his administration changes its approach to world affairs in its
second term, it will continue to erode America's good name, and hence
its ability to effectively influence world affairs."
That’s not terribly surprising, though it’s worth noting that the
percentage of those polled who disagree with the idea of the U.S. having
a mainly positive impact on the world has gone up 12 percent since last
year, when that view was already approaching majority status. As this
site has noted before, this is a poll of 21 nations, and in only three
(India, the Philippines and, lest we forget, Poland) was Bush’s November
victory viewed positively. Fifty-eight percent of those polled believe
Bush will have a negative impact on peace and security, while only 26
percent think he’ll improve it in the four more years that began earlier
today.
- Jeff Fleischer
http://www.motherjones.com/news/blog/index.html#2
--
"A post edit is not a forgery. The entire post is
under my name. I can post whatever I want. I even
documented my correction to your post."
-Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> explaining why he forged
text and falsely attributed it to me.
<yOCdnRiVUdGQwUXcRVn-iQ@rcn.net>
news:yOCdnRiVUdGQwUXcRVn-iQ@rcn.net
.
|
|
| User: "Graham" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
21 Jan 2005 12:59:05 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." wrote:
Even less respected in the world
January 20, 2005 3:28 PM
During her confirmation hearing this week, Condi Rice acknowledged that
the U.S. government has some bridges to rebuild with the rest of the
world. On the day of George Bush’s re-inauguration, a new poll
commissioned by the BBC World Service helps demonstrate how much repair
work remains.
"Our research makes very clear that the re-election of President
Bush has further isolated America from the world," pollster Doug Miller
told The Guardian. "It also supports the view of some Americans that
unless his administration changes its approach to world affairs in its
second term, it will continue to erode America's good name, and hence
its ability to effectively influence world affairs."
That’s not terribly surprising, though it’s worth noting that the
percentage of those polled who disagree with the idea of the U.S. having
a mainly positive impact on the world has gone up 12 percent since last
year, when that view was already approaching majority status. As this
site has noted before, this is a poll of 21 nations, and in only three
(India, the Philippines and, lest we forget, Poland) was Bush’s November
victory viewed positively. Fifty-eight percent of those polled believe
Bush will have a negative impact on peace and security, while only 26
percent think he’ll improve it in the four more years that began earlier
today.
- Jeff Fleischer
http://www.motherjones.com/news/blog/index.html#2
More Bush-bashing. No alternate plans, of course. That would require
thinking.
Btw the less popular George Bush is with short-sighted foreigners, the
better.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
21 Jan 2005 10:41:30 PM |
|
|
Graham <hjg@ghj.ghj> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." wrote:
Even less respected in the world
During her confirmation hearing this week, Condi Rice acknowledged that
the U.S. government has some bridges to rebuild with the rest of the
world. On the day of George Bush’s re-inauguration, a new poll
commissioned by the BBC World Service helps demonstrate how much repair
work remains.
"Our research makes very clear that the re-election of President
Bush has further isolated America from the world," pollster Doug Miller
told The Guardian. "It also supports the view of some Americans that
unless his administration changes its approach to world affairs in its
second term, it will continue to erode America's good name, and hence
its ability to effectively influence world affairs."
Most of the rest of the world hated Reagan too. They had
a hissy fit over things like his deployment of Pershing II
missiles in Europe, but they got over it.
http://www.motherjones.com/news/blog/index.html#2
More Bush-bashing. No alternate plans, of course. That would require
thinking.
Most libs have *nothing* interesting to say these days.
Nothing constructive or amusing either. The vast majority
of their posts can be condensed to "Bush sucks". There's
no point in reading most of their crap anymore.
Btw the less popular George Bush is with short-sighted foreigners, the
better.
They're our competitors, of course they dislike anything
that makes us stronger.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
21 Jan 2005 11:57:26 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Graham <hjg@ghj.ghj> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." wrote:
Even less respected in the world
During her confirmation hearing this week, Condi Rice acknowledged that
the U.S. government has some bridges to rebuild with the rest of the
world. On the day of George Bush’s re-inauguration, a new poll
commissioned by the BBC World Service helps demonstrate how much repair
work remains.
"Our research makes very clear that the re-election of President
Bush has further isolated America from the world," pollster Doug Miller
told The Guardian. "It also supports the view of some Americans that
unless his administration changes its approach to world affairs in its
second term, it will continue to erode America's good name, and hence
its ability to effectively influence world affairs."
Most of the rest of the world hated Reagan too. They had
a hissy fit over things like his deployment of Pershing II
missiles in Europe, but they got over it.
And trading with America's enemies in order to promote terrorism.
No, I don't think that they have gotten over it. The ones that are
still alive, that is.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
21 Jan 2005 11:20:59 PM |
|
|
In article <4el3v0lf151m1ea5jpdvrap69gaeq6j8d8@4ax.com>,
foxtrot@null.com says...
Btw the less popular George Bush is with short-sighted foreigners, the
better.
They're our competitors, of course they dislike anything
that makes us stronger.
Do you think that forcing a nation to accept US rule makes the people of
that nation a democratic and free nation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
21 Jan 2005 11:49:10 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
foxtrot@null.com says...
Btw the less popular George Bush is with short-sighted foreigners, the
better.
They're our competitors, of course they dislike anything
that makes us stronger.
Do you think that forcing a nation to accept US rule makes the people of
that nation a democratic and free nation?
You talking about Iraq? America defeated them in the
Gulf War, remember, limey? FYI winners of wars *DO*
get to tell the losers what to do.
Geez, are you really this clueless or are you joking?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 08:12:23 AM |
|
|
In article <snp3v0t21lh4nnr8ffaut74o1cb06d43ec@4ax.com>,
foxtrot@null.com says...
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
foxtrot@null.com says...
Btw the less popular George Bush is with short-sighted foreigners, the
better.
They're our competitors, of course they dislike anything
that makes us stronger.
Do you think that forcing a nation to accept US rule makes the people of
that nation a democratic and free nation?
You talking about Iraq?
Amongst others.
America defeated them in the
Gulf War, remember, limey? FYI winners of wars *DO*
get to tell the losers what to do.
Geez, are you really this clueless or are you joking?
In what way does defeating an unarmed country by force of arms make the
people of that country free and democratic, yank? :-))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 01:56:12 PM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
foxtrot@null.com says...
America defeated them in the
Gulf War, remember, limey? FYI winners of wars *DO*
get to tell the losers what to do.
Geez, are you really this clueless or are you joking?
In what way does defeating an unarmed country by force of arms make the
people of that country free and democratic, yank? :-))
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies? What do you call the missiles
he fired at our surveillance planes? If he was unarmed,
it was extremely stupid and self-destructive of him to
behave the way he did, doncha think?
You lefties are determined to make Hussein into a
completely harmless victim, aren't you?
BTW does Blair get as much blame as Bush?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 03:19:53 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
foxtrot@null.com says...
America defeated them in the
Gulf War, remember, limey? FYI winners of wars *DO*
get to tell the losers what to do.
Geez, are you really this clueless or are you joking?
In what way does defeating an unarmed country by force of arms make the
people of that country free and democratic, yank? :-))
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 03:40:27 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
I count over a dozen SCUD attacks against Israel and
Saudi Arabia, some involving multiple missiles.
But according to you Bush haters, Hussein was actually
just throwing flowers to his friends, wasn't he?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 05:19:34 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
That's from 1991, idiot, and has nothing to do with the 2003 invasion.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 05:43:30 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
That's from 1991, idiot, and has nothing to do with the 2003 invasion.
I said the "SCUD missiles he launched". The "he"
that was the dictator of Iraq in 2003 was the exact
same dictator they had in 1991, you dolt. LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
22 Jan 2005 11:29:17 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
That's from 1991, idiot, and has nothing to do with the 2003 invasion.
I said the "SCUD missiles he launched". The "he"
You chickenshit little *****. All you can do is play little games
in your desperate attempt to justify killing tens of thousands of
innocent people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 10:37:57 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
That's from 1991, idiot, and has nothing to do with the 2003
invasion.
I said the "SCUD missiles he launched". The "he"
You chickenshit little *****. All you can do is play little games
in your desperate attempt to justify killing tens of thousands of
innocent people.
We have experience from debating a similar subject with Japanese
militarist sympathizers.
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 01:57:22 PM |
|
|
Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
UNARMED?!? What do you call the SCUD missiles he
launched at our allies?
Fiction.
Really?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/nirq050.htm
That's from 1991, idiot, and has nothing to do with the 2003
invasion.
I said the "SCUD missiles he launched". The "he"
You chickenshit little *****. All you can do is play little games
in your desperate attempt to justify killing tens of thousands of
innocent people.
We have experience from debating a similar subject with Japanese
militarist sympathizers.
Japan attacked the US, *****. Iraq did not and could not.
You just want to justify killing tens of thousands of innocent
people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 02:10:12 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
We have experience from debating a similar subject with Japanese
militarist sympathizers.
Japan attacked the US, *****. Iraq did not and could not.
You just want to justify killing tens of thousands of innocent
people.
Iraq attacked an ally of ours, then failed to comply
with the ceasefire agreement.
Lots of innocent people were killed when DEMOCRAT
Harry Truman nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Does
that make Truman a mass murderer?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 02:37:27 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
We have experience from debating a similar subject with Japanese
militarist sympathizers.
Japan attacked the US, *****. Iraq did not and could not.
You just want to justify killing tens of thousands of innocent
people.
Iraq attacked an ally of ours, then failed to comply
with the ceasefire agreement.
That's no justification for invasion. Especially since the agreement
was not with the United States.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 02:51:18 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Iraq attacked an ally of ours, then failed to comply
with the ceasefire agreement.
That's no justification for invasion.
By itself, perhaps not. But couple it with Hussein's
attempt to assassinate GHW Bush, his shooting at
our surveillance aircraft, and his financing homicide
bombers. Put all those together, and the little *****
had to go.
Especially since the agreement
was not with the United States.
You libs anoint the UN as the ultimate word in justice.
So shouldn't what they say be enforced?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
23 Jan 2005 07:12:15 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Iraq attacked an ally of ours, then failed to comply
with the ceasefire agreement.
That's no justification for invasion.
By itself, perhaps not. But couple it with Hussein's
attempt to assassinate GHW Bush,
Fiction the equivalent of the WMD scam.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/content/?020930fr_archive02
his shooting at
our surveillance aircraft,
Over Iraqi airspace.
and his financing homicide
bombers.
An outright lie.
Put all those together,
And we find that you're a psychopathic ***** who uses lies to justify
your perverse desire to murder tens of thousands of innocent people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 01:07:51 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
By itself, perhaps not. But couple it with Hussein's
attempt to assassinate GHW Bush,
Fiction the equivalent of the WMD scam.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/content/?020930fr_archive02
Seymore Hersh?!? LOL, no thanks.
Are you calling BJ a liar?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/timeline/062793.htm
Clinton said he ordered the attack after receiving "compelling
evidence" from U.S. intelligence officials that Bush had
been the target of an assassination plot and that the plot
was "directed and pursued by the Iraqi Intelligence Service."
his shooting at
our surveillance aircraft,
Over Iraqi airspace.
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
and his financing homicide
bombers.
An outright lie.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/04/03/international1353EST0619.DTL
Iraq increases payments to families of Palestinian suicide
bombers to $25,000
Wednesday, April 3, 2002
Put all those together,
And we find that you're a psychopathic ***** who uses lies to justify
your perverse desire to murder tens of thousands of innocent people.
Now you claim that we have some "perverse desire to
murder"? You were batting zero so far in that post, but
now you're downright embarrassing yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 01:38:06 AM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
By itself, perhaps not. But couple it with Hussein's
attempt to assassinate GHW Bush,
Fiction the equivalent of the WMD scam.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/content/?020930fr_archive02
Seymore Hersh?!? LOL, no thanks.
Are you calling BJ a liar?
No, I'm calling you a liar.
his shooting at
our surveillance aircraft,
Over Iraqi airspace.
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
Is that non sequitur supposed to mean something, *****?
and his financing homicide
bombers.
An outright lie.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/04/03/international1353EST0619.DTL
Iraq increases payments to families of Palestinian suicide
bombers to $25,000
Famili`es. Not bombers.
Proving that not only are you a liar, you're a stupid ***** as well.
Put all those together,
And we find that you're a psychopathic ***** who uses lies to justify
your perverse desire to murder tens of thousands of innocent people.
Now you claim that we have some "perverse desire to
murder"?
Not "we", *****. YOU.
YOU try to justify an illegal invasion that has killed tens of
thousands of innocent people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 09:19:51 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/content/?020930fr_archive02
Seymore Hersh?!? LOL, no thanks.
Are you calling BJ a liar?
No, I'm calling you a liar.
Aw poor Fishy doesn't like the fact that BJ says he's
wrong, so he's attacking me!
Over Iraqi airspace.
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
Is that non sequitur supposed to mean something, *****?
Yeah, it means that we beat them in a war, so we
are entitled to use their airspace any way we like.
Suppose we should have allowed the remaining
Nazis to tell us what to do after we won WW2, Fishy?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/04/03/international1353EST0619.DTL
Iraq increases payments to families of Palestinian suicide
bombers to $25,000
Famili`es. Not bombers.
Proving that not only are you a liar, you're a stupid ***** as well.
The bombers were dead, moron. Hussein was paying
their families, thus subsidizing their efforts. You are
one dumb individual, Fishface!
And we find that you're a psychopathic ***** who uses lies to justify
your perverse desire to murder tens of thousands of innocent people.
Now you claim that we have some "perverse desire to
murder"?
Not "we", *****. YOU.
YOU try to justify an illegal invasion that has killed tens of
thousands of innocent people.
51+% of American voters voted for Bush. Are they all
perverted murderers? You're just seething with hatred
for Bush. Gonna take it all out on me? Heh heh
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 10:11:43 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Over Iraqi airspace.
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
Is that non sequitur supposed to mean something, *****?
Yeah, it means that we beat them in a war, so we
are entitled to use their airspace any way we like.
The rational of the murderous lunatic.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2002/04/03/international1353EST0619.DTL
Iraq increases payments to families of Palestinian suicide
bombers to $25,000
Famili`es. Not bombers.
Proving that not only are you a liar,
You're a liar and a coward, and all so that you can rationalize
killing tens of thousands of innocent people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 03:02:05 PM |
|
|
In article <8docv0h22spj4d0bk79jutmrcjjh38kg8g@4ax.com>,
foxtrot@null.com says...
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
Is that non sequitur supposed to mean something, *****?
Yeah, it means that we beat them in a war, so we
are entitled to use their airspace any way we like.
You wish! ;-))
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
25 Jan 2005 03:01:34 PM |
|
|
In article <3arbv0lrb8odamhnni852aeubjuo1eridt@4ax.com>,
foxtrot@null.com says...
his shooting at
our surveillance aircraft,
Over Iraqi airspace.
We defeated them in a war, dumbass.
A heavily armed military superpower (in possession of WMDs) massacres a
lightly armed (with no WMD) forces.
There was no 'war' in Iraq that the US 'won'.
The US has attacked Iraq on two basic occasions:
1. When Iraq invaded Kuwait and the US went to help, pushed the Iraqis
back into their own country... then occupied about half of Iraq.
Needlessly! Iraq wasn't a viable threat any more to any other country by
then!
2. When, about a decade later, the US illegally fully invaded Iraq
giving blatant lies, and since clearly proven to be lies, as the reason,
overthrew their democratically elected government, with NO EXCUSE, and
proceeded to massacre the Iraqi civilians!
War?
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Foxtrot" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
28 Jan 2005 12:45:54 AM |
|
|
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL, I love it when you left wing globalists talk about
an "illegal" invasion. Illegal implies that there's some
kind of mechanism capable of enforcement.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
28 Jan 2005 09:12:52 PM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL, I love it when you left wing globalists talk about
an "illegal" invasion. Illegal implies that there's some
kind of mechanism capable of enforcement.
"Murder and theft are legal provided that you don't get caught."
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
28 Jan 2005 09:37:34 PM |
|
|
In article <cteuvj$hdm$1@bolt.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL, I love it when you left wing globalists talk about
an "illegal" invasion. Illegal implies that there's some
kind of mechanism capable of enforcement.
"Murder and theft are legal provided that you don't get caught."
Osprey, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: David Barnes admits he is ignorant and a coward |
29 Jan 2005 08:01:07 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:280120051937348694%spam@aol.com...
In article <cteuvj$hdm$1@bolt.sonic.net>, Ray Fischer
<rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote:
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote:
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL, I love it when you left wing globalists talk about
an "illegal" invasion. Illegal implies that there's some
kind of mechanism capable of enforcement.
"Murder and theft are legal provided that you don't get caught."
Osprey, right?
From: "David W. Barnes" <s...@aol.com>
Message-ID: <250120050815024643%spam@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:15:02 -0800
Well, for me, I don't use a killfile, I just ignore posts that are
meaningless.
David Barnes said
I don't either - I find it kind of cowardly and ignorant. I can handle
these idiots just fine.
Barnes said above, killfiling people is cowardly and ignorant...lets see
what Barnes said Friday, Nov. 15, 2002....
From: David Barnes <dbar...@barnsco.com>
Message-ID: <141120022050126465%dbar...@barnsco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:49:40 GMT
"Pat, excuse me for cutting in but I "kill filed" him long ago and I
rarely see his stuff."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
28 Jan 2005 09:36:31 AM |
|
|
Foxtrot <foxtrot@null.com> wrote in news:8gnjv0pbg7anaj0vemndap48uql2c7tg8r@
4ax.com:
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL, I love it when you left wing globalists talk about
an "illegal" invasion. Illegal implies that there's some
kind of mechanism capable of enforcement.
What happened to Bush 41's "New World Order"?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pat Winstanley" |
|
| Title: Re: Even less respected in the world |
28 Jan 2005 01:56:47 PM |
|
|
In article <8gnjv0pbg7anaj0vemndap48uql2c7tg8r@4ax.com>,
foxtrot@null.com says...
Pat Winstanley <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
There was no *war*.
There was illegal *invasion*!
LOL,
You seem to think that acting illegally is somehow 'funny'.
Perhaps you'll grow up some day and become an adult with an
understanding of the reason society (whether local, national or global)
has laws.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
