Evil abortion



 Science > Abortion > Evil abortion

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "IBen Getiner"
Date: 10 Jul 2005 08:40:14 PM
Object: Evil abortion
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m74.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m68.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m71.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m80.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m69.jpg
.

User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 10 Jul 2005 09:46:50 PM
On 10 Jul 2005 18:40:14 -0700,
Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual. And in line with the
subject headers of his recent demonstrations of his ignorance
and asininity --
... abortion is not the LEAST BIT "evil," "vile," "wicked,"
"selfish," "sick," "murderous," "immoral," "insidious," or
"heinous."
In fact, it is the exact OPPOSITE of all those ludicrous
descriptions.
Abortion is nothing more than a hugely-beneficial REMEDY
for the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed pregnancy, for
all who choose to access it.
Like ALL other remedies, it is a form of SELF-DEFENSE on
the part of the victim against the offending pathology.
And over any given recent 18-year-long period, it has enabled,
and continues to enable, no fewer than a BILLION (with a "B")
girls and women, worldwide, to immediately put their lives back
on track, and have complete RESTORATION of their well-being,
and full range of future opportunities, to the status enjoyed
BEFORE the ill-timed pregnancy occurred. It becomes as though
that dangerous and opportunities-threatening inconvenience had
never happened. It totally UNDOES and *reverses* the unwanted
condition. Harmlessly.
(And then MOST of those girls and women go on to HAVE
children later on, also by choice -- when the timing for that is
better and more opportune for them. Thus, there is no impact
on population growth... despite the fact that LYING that it does
that is part of the hate-propaganda and disinformation that is
ignorantly spewed by thoughtless and bigoted people like you.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "IBen Getiner"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 01:17:48 AM
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/photosbyage/images/07w-02.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/monica/m59.jpg
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 07:58:16 AM
On 10 Jul 2005 23:17:48 -0700,
Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 10:01:52 AM
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message...

On 10 Jul 2005 23:17:48 -0700,
Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:

...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled to their
opinion and you can just delete it? Why not act mature, a MAN (something you
have a hard time with) and respond to his post without DELETING it and
calling him childish names?
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 03:14:56 PM
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:01:52 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled
to their opinion and you can just delete it?

SURE he's entitled to his opinion. Just as *I* was entitled to
express MY opinion about the faked body parts he posted links to
photos of -- which thus comprised nothing worthwhile. And which
I was by no means required to repeat for him in *my* post.

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ... names?

I employed only accurate descriptors.
A person has to be a MORON *and* a BIGOT to support a
loathsome agenda that seeks to impose IMMENSE hardship upon
no fewer than tens of MILLIONS of women by FORCING childbirth
upon them. AGAINST their will.Resulting in the DENIAL of their
rights... their RELEGATION to second-class-citizen status... their
INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE to mere, NON-sentient developing
entities which are, in all important ways, equivalent to sperm and
ova (human, unique, NON-sentient, a stage of development
without which NO births would occur -- and alive); entities which
the WOMEN would very properly, under the circumstances,
regard to be parasitic. Further manifestations of that hardship
would be the DISRUPTION of their well-being, both short-term
and long-term (as in, for decades or a lifetime)... and the
DESTRUCTION of countless of their opportunities.
That's not something that ANY person having both intelligence
and common sense could ever do. Doing something that mindless
and hateful is clear evidence of the lack of one or both of those
attributes.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 03:26:19 PM
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:0nk5d1th1kncj3aqc4r6t36mjnc8v96gvn@4ax.com...

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:01:52 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:



...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled
to their opinion and you can just delete it?


SURE he's entitled to his opinion. Just as *I* was entitled to
express MY opinion about the faked body parts

What faked body parts? You DELETED his post and posted NOTHING worthwhile in
response.

he posted links to
photos of -- which thus comprised nothing worthwhile. And which
I was by no means required to repeat for him in *my* post.

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ... names?


There you go, forging my post. Thanks for proving me correct yet again.
Aren't you man enough to respond to the WHOLE post? What are you so afraid
of?
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 07:28:47 PM
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:26:19 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled
to their opinion and you can just delete it?

SURE he's entitled to his opinion. Just as *I* was entitled to
express MY opinion about the faked body parts he posted links to
photos of -- which thus comprised nothing worthwhile. ...

What faked body parts?

The ones in the photos he linked to. A very idiotic and lame
attempt at hate-propaganda by their dishonest crafters.

You DELETED his post and posted NOTHING worthwile in
response.

I deleted the hate-propaganda, rather than compound his stupidity
by *repeating* it. My comment that his post had contained nothing
worthwhile was an honest observation, and therefore IT *was* worthwhile.

And which I was by no means required to repeat for him in *my* post.

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ... names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.
Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.
BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case of
Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and magazines).
Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

Aren't you man enough to respond to the WHOLE post?

Aren't you man enough to simply write it honestly and truthfully in
the FIRST place -- thus making editing unnecessary?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 07:51:08 PM
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:0nk5d1th1kncj3aqc4r6t36mjnc8v96gvn@4ax.com...

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:01:52 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:



...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled
to their opinion and you can just delete it?


SURE he's entitled to his opinion. Just as *I* was entitled to
express MY opinion about the faked body parts

What faked body parts? You DELETED his post and posted NOTHING worthwhile in
response.

he posted links to
photos of -- which thus comprised nothing worthwhile. And which
I was by no means required to repeat for him in *my* post.

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ... names?


There you go, forging my post. Thanks for proving me correct yet again.
Aren't you man enough to respond to the WHOLE post? What are you so afraid
of?
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 08:44:29 PM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:51:08 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" <noneya@youwish.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling
him ... names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "IBen Getiner"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 11 Jul 2005 11:35:07 PM
Craig Chilton wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:51:08 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" <noneya@youwish.com> wrote:
.com>

<snip>
INTOLERANT
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 07:50:29 AM
On 11 Jul 2005 21:35:07 -0700,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
<snip>


INTOLERANT

ROTFL!!!!!
That from a clueless BIGOT who supports a loathsome
agenda that seeks to impose IMMENSE hardship upon no
fewer than tens of MILLIONS of women by FORCING childbirth
upon them. AGAINST their will. Resulting in the DENIAL of
their rights... their RELEGATION to second-class-citizen
status... their INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE to mere, NON-
sentient developing entities which are, in all important ways,
equivalent to sperm and ova (human, unique, NON-sentient,
a stage of development without which NO births would occur --
and alive); entities which the WOMEN would very properly,
under the circumstances, regard to be parasitic. Further mani-
festations of that hardship would be the DISRUPTION of their
well-being, both short-term and long-term (as in, for decades
or a lifetime)... and the DESTRUCTION of countless of their
opportunities.
And THAT is intolerant as it GETS.
Why not just join the Ku Klux Klan? It couldn't make you
any *worse* a sewer rat turd floating in humanity's punchbowl
than you already are.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.


User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 03:24:09 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:25:05 GMT,
"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:



...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


So you figure that since you know best, others aren't entitled
to their opinion and you can just delete it?


SURE he's entitled to his opinion. Just as *I* was entitled to
express MY opinion about the faked body parts he posted links to
photos of -- which thus comprised nothing worthwhile. ...


What faked body parts?


The ones in the photos he linked to. A very idiotic and lame
attempt at hate-propaganda by their dishonest crafters.


Where is your proof they are faked?



You DELETED his post and posted NOTHING worthwhile in
response.


I deleted the hate-propaganda, rather than compound his stupidity
by *repeating* it.


So, you don't mind your hate-propaganda being deleted?


My comment that his post had contained nothing
worthwhile was an honest observation, and therefore IT *was* worthwhile.


No, that is YOUR opinion.



And which I was by no means required to repeat for him in *my* post.


Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ... names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST manner?


You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 07:43:12 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:24:09 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 08:33:06 AM
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:p9d7d1pntjfhghsce152vgjnuhidvv6pgo@4ax.com...

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:24:09 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit, forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 09:05:00 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:24:09 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 09:12:49 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.

User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 09:13:09 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 11:44:46 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:24:09 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.


User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 12 Jul 2005 12:35:16 PM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 12:25:32 AM
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:35:16 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.
User: "IBen Getiner"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 04:01:05 AM
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/photosbyage/images/08w-2002-07.jpg
http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/photosbyage/images/08w-2002-05.jpg
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 08:45:40 AM
On 13 Jul 2005 02:01:05 -0700,
Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual. And in line with the
subject headers of his recent demonstrations of his ignorance
and asininity --
... abortion is not the LEAST BIT "evil," "vile," "wicked,"
"selfish," "sick," "murderous," "immoral," "insidious," or
"heinous."
In fact, it is the exact OPPOSITE of all those ludicrous
descriptions.
Abortion is nothing more than a hugely-beneficial REMEDY
for the unwanted medical condition of ill-timed pregnancy, for
all who choose to access it.
Like ALL other remedies, it is a form of SELF-DEFENSE on
the part of the victim against the offending pathology.
And over any given recent 18-year-long period, it has enabled,
and continues to enable, no fewer than a BILLION (with a "B")
girls and women, worldwide, to immediately put their lives back
on track, and have complete RESTORATION of their well-being,
and full range of future opportunities, to the status enjoyed
BEFORE the ill-timed pregnancy occurred. It becomes as though
that dangerous and opportunities-threatening inconvenience had
never happened. It totally UNDOES and *reverses* the unwanted
condition. Harmlessly.
(And then MOST of those girls and women go on to HAVE
children later on, also by choice -- when the timing for that is
better and more opportune for them. Thus, there is no impact
on population growth... despite the fact that LYING that it does
that is part of the hate-propaganda and disinformation that is
ignorantly spewed by thoughtless and bigoted people like you.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.




User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 07:47:46 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 08:46:24 AM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:47:46 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.


User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 09:05:57 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.

User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 09:05:59 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 13 Jul 2005 09:15:15 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:05:59 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.


User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 14 Jul 2005 03:10:15 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.

User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 14 Jul 2005 03:14:36 AM
Immature & Hateful little Bigot, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
whined and lied again:

"Sir Marksman" spoke the truth:

Immature Loser, Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:


...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.


[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?


There you go, forging my post.


Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.


[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]

###--->

ROFL! You REALLY ARE an immature moron! It is OK for you to edit,
forge and
delete other's posts, but when the EXACT same is done to yours, you
whine
and claim FOUL!
.
User: "Craig Chilton"

Title: Re: Evil abortion 14 Jul 2005 12:48:17 PM
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:14:36 GMT,
Anonymous Bigot, "Sir Marksman" lied:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Immature Loser, "Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sir Marksman" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Moronic Bigot, "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" wrote:
...NOTHING worthwhile, as usual.

[ ... ]

Why not ... respond to his post without ... calling him ...
names?

There you go, forging my post.

Forging is an attempt to make it appear that someone else wrote
something. Not even remotely forging. That's called FAIR editing.

[[[ READERS: Material delineated by "###" symbols is RESTORED
relevant material that he DUCKED by omitting it from his response. ]]]
###--->

Fair editing is the omission (substituting ellipses for the omitted
material) or substitution of accurate/honest terms -- within brackets,
so that everyone will know that the substitution was not written by
the original poster.

BOTH of those are accepted editing methods, both in the case
of Netiquette, and in the real world (such as in newspapers and
magazines).

Such editing generally is done so that such things as profanity,
lies, or distortions are not included in the response. I in no way
changed the meaning of what you said with the acknowledged (by
ellipses) editing. I simply removed the insulting distortions.

<---###

You FORGED my post. Why can't you respond in an HONEST
manner?

You actually ARE a very *ignorant* person, aren't you?

Nope. Why can't you respond in an honest manner?

I **always** do.
A concept that obviously is totally alien to your entire psyche.
(BTW, I notice that you still are babyishly directing followups to
your posts to alt.idiots and alt.morons, so presumably you are
"residing" -- very APPROPRIATELY -- in those groups, and then
monitoring the conventional groups for responses. Since, in *my*
case at least, I always post only to the latter, and you're seeing
those responses. Tell me... were you BORN a total fool, or did
you take special lessons in stupidity?)
Thus... you remain one of the biggest laughingstocks in Usenet.
-- Craig Chilton

~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
On Those Who Post ANONYMOUSLY...
"As for posting anonymously, it makes no difference
whether a FAIR-MINDED person who is opposed to a hateful
agenda (Anti-Choice) posts anonymously or not, since he/she
has NOTHING to be ASHAMED of in the first place, when
putting up such posts. The only anonymous COWARDS
are those who spew shameful hate and repression, while
hiding behind an alias in the process... just like a Ku Klux Klans-
man who cravenly hides his face under a hood."
~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~*~*~*~*~*~~
To E-mail me, simply remove the "_" .
.
















  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER