| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"bobandcarole" |
| Date: |
11 Nov 2006 04:36:14 PM |
| Object: |
Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8%
of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as "homosexual" or
"bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the
Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in
homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex
within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our
population is heterosexual in orientation.
Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are
"heterosexual" males, thus shifting the focus away from their own
very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is
heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations
are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that
homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do
heterosexuals.
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/one.php
.
|
|
| User: "Juanjo" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:51:49 PM |
|
|
"bobandcarole" <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163284574.097151.102690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8%
of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as "homosexual" or
"bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the
Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in
homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex
within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our
population is heterosexual in orientation.
Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are
"heterosexual" males, thus shifting the focus away from their own
very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is
heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations
are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that
homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do
heterosexuals.
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/one.php
These claims are based not upon any scientific study but rather upon the
selective reading of various scientific studies to create an impression of
such a conclusion. It is a creation of right wing fundamentalists to
support their foregone conclusions.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 04:38:11 PM |
|
|
In News 1163284574.097151.102690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com, typed this:
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 06:15:48 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL003@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
In News 1163284574.097151.102690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com, typed this:
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
Do you think the fraction of the population that is gay changes
significantly over time? 1992 is current enough. The real problem is
that the survey "bobandcarole" came up with 2.6 percent of the
population that admitted to having gay sex in the past 12 months, and
4 percent had gay sex within the past 5 years. Somehow that gets
turned into only 1 to 2 percent - obviously bobandcarole made the 1 to
2 percent up.
Also, you should note that the margin of error in the survey was not
stated, and it is probably fairly high. If they surveyed 1000 people,
2 percent is 20 individuals, with a standard deviation of around 4 to
5. It is not unheard of to see errors that are several times the
standard deviation. So basically, the survey (if reported acurately)
might not have turned up anything we didn't already know: most
estimates of the fraction of the population that is gay come up with
numbers around 3 to 5 percent (higher if one includes bisexuals).
.
|
|
|
| User: "ByTor" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:18:37 PM |
|
|
In article <87psbteczt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>,
says...
Do you think
Is it possible that maybe you can remove <alt.recovery.aa> from your
replies.......It's off topic & does not belong in that group.
Thank You.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 08:08:30 PM |
|
|
ByTor <ByTor@snowdog.com> writes:
In article <87psbteczt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>,
says...
Do you think
Is it possible that maybe you can remove <alt.recovery.aa> from your
replies.......It's off topic & does not belong in that group.
Thank You.
I didn't notice - hardly anyone manages to consistently. The person
to really harass about it is the person who added your group in the
first place. Sometimes when I have snipped an irrelevant group, a
subsequent reply to my post has that irrelevant group added back
anyway.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ByTor" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 08:18:02 PM |
|
|
In article <87bqnda02m.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>,
says...
I didn't notice - hardly anyone manages to consistently. The person
to really harass about it is the person who added your group in the
first place. Sometimes when I have snipped an irrelevant group, a
subsequent reply to my post has that irrelevant group added back
anyway.
Well as I said to someone earlier, less posts of this stuff is better
than all of em ya know........I know who the main ***** is as
he/she/it is targeting someone here in the aa group...... ;0)
I sometimes make the mistake of not looking in the list of groups but
try very hard to keep on top of it......Problem with x'd groups is not
knowing who is in what group to respond in or else I'd wipe the groups
myself.
Thanks for responding.......
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ronald More-More Moshki" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:26:10 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL003@THISADDRESS.FOAD> writes:
In News 1163284574.097151.102690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com, typed this:
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
Do you think the fraction of the population that is gay changes
significantly over time? 1992 is current enough. The real problem is
that the survey "bobandcarole" came up with 2.6 percent of the
population that admitted to having gay sex in the past 12 months, and
4 percent had gay sex within the past 5 years. Somehow that gets
turned into only 1 to 2 percent - obviously bobandcarole made the 1 to
2 percent up.
Also, you should note that the margin of error in the survey was not
stated, and it is probably fairly high. If they surveyed 1000 people,
2 percent is 20 individuals, with a standard deviation of around 4 to
5. It is not unheard of to see errors that are several times the
standard deviation. So basically, the survey (if reported acurately)
might not have turned up anything we didn't already know: most
estimates of the fraction of the population that is gay come up with
numbers around 3 to 5 percent (higher if one includes bisexuals).
Gay men are attracted to men, not kids.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gilgoe" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:01:57 PM |
|
|
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
True, but it's not all that long ago, either. Do you think the
percentage of homosexuals in the population has drastically changed
since 1992?
Even if it has doubled, that would still mean that....in proportion to
their numbers....
way, way more homosexuals molest children than heterosexuals do.
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:12:28 PM |
|
|
In News 1163286117.458083.168520@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,, gilgoe at
whitemountain6@aol.com, typed this:
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
True, but it's not all that long ago, either. Do you think the
percentage of homosexuals in the population has drastically changed
since 1992?
Do I think that such survey's are anywhere close to accurate?
Even if it has doubled, that would still mean that....in proportion to
their numbers....
way, way more homosexuals molest children than heterosexuals do.
Which is utter nonsense. A quick look at the FBI Criminal stats and the sex
offender registries for the various states shows that in a heartbeat.
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
And "60 Minutes" credentials for making such claims are what exactly?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "gilgoe" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:26:33 PM |
|
|
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
And "60 Minutes" credentials for making such claims are what exactly?
I think they said the statistics came from the FBI, but I'm not
positive about that part. I remember for certain, however, that it was
stated during a segment about homosexuals trying to force themselves on
the Boy Scouts as "out" gay Scout leaders, and I believe the segment
was presented by Leslie Stahl....therefore maybe we can hunt down a
transcript.
I'll see what I can find.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gilgoe" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:40:11 PM |
|
|
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
And "60 Minutes" credentials for making such claims are what exactly?
I think they said the statistics came from the FBI, but I'm not
positive about that part. I remember for certain, however, that it was
stated during a segment about homosexuals trying to force themselves on
the Boy Scouts as "out" gay Scout leaders, and I believe the segment
was presented by Leslie Stahl....therefore maybe we can hunt down a
transcript.
I'll see what I can find.
Seems that it was longer ago than I thought....March of 2001, to be
exact. Here's a page referrencing the broadcast I am referring to, but
I see no way to link to a transcript of the show segment or order a
video or DVD of it.
I'll keep trying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gilgoe" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:47:52 PM |
|
|
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
And "60 Minutes" credentials for making such claims are what exactly?
I think they said the statistics came from the FBI, but I'm not
positive about that part. I remember for certain, however, that it was
stated during a segment about homosexuals trying to force themselves on
the Boy Scouts as "out" gay Scout leaders, and I believe the segment
was presented by Leslie Stahl....therefore maybe we can hunt down a
transcript.
I'll see what I can find.
Seems that it was longer ago than I thought....March of 2001, to be
exact. Here's a page referrencing the broadcast I am referring to....
Forgot the link....sorry about that.
Here it is:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/03/29/60minutes/main282495.shtml
but
I see no way to link to a transcript of the show segment or order a
video or DVD of it.
I'll keep trying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ByTor" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:18:07 PM |
|
|
In article <1163288872.694755.217630@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
whitemountain6@aol.com says...
Forgot the link....sorry about that.
Is it possible that maybe you can remove <alt.recovery.aa> from your
replies.......It's off topic & does not belong in that group.
Thank You.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:41:02 PM |
|
|
ByTor wrote:
In article <1163288872.694755.217630@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
whitemountain6@aol.com says...
Forgot the link....sorry about that.
Is it possible that maybe you can remove <alt.recovery.aa> from your
replies.......It's off topic & does not belong in that group.
Most child molesters are ***** heads
Thank You.
Anytime
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bobandcarole" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 07:37:57 PM |
|
|
gilgoe wrote:
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
Considering the fact that we outnumber the ***** packers considerably,
that's a LOT of queer baby rapists.
And "60 Minutes" credentials for making such claims are what exactly?
I think they said the statistics came from the FBI, but I'm not
positive about that part. I remember for certain, however, that it was
stated during a segment about homosexuals trying to force themselves on
the Boy Scouts as "out" gay Scout leaders, and I believe the segment
was presented by Leslie Stahl....therefore maybe we can hunt down a
transcript.
I'll see what I can find.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: heterosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 08:34:19 PM |
|
|
bobandcarole <bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com> wrote:
gilgoe wrote:
The TV show, "60 Minutes", stated a year or so ago that research shows
that about 30% of child molesters are homosexuals.
Considering the fact that we outnumber the ***** packers considerably,
that's a LOT of queer baby rapists.
I thought you were one of the "***** packers".
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "F.H." |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
11 Nov 2006 05:16:38 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
You can drop araa any time. ;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 05:46:12 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163284574.097151.102690@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, bobandcarole
at bobandcarole1010@hotmail.com, typed this:
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current
surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992
1992 can hardly be considered "current".
Then you can provide something you consider "current" that can debunk
bobandcarole's cite?
No?
I didn't think you could.
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about Saddams
17 U.N. Violations. First you said he violated none of them, then you
said he violated two. The whole time you were unable to provide any
cites to debunk the Federal Governments cite I gave.
Then again, it's a proven fact that you will believe what ever you want
to believe WITHOUT checking the facts.
Well, here we go again with you trying to attack the source and not the
issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 08:55:56 AM |
|
|
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about Saddams
17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam violated 17
UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out to be
erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your ***** once again.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 03:58:09 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about Saddams
17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam violated 17
UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out to be
erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your ***** once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you. Show a credible source to
support your position that the UN tentatviely said he only violated
two.
You lost, which is nothing unusual for you. Debate, as far as you and
I are concerned...over.
Osprey 1
Andrealpussey 0
Another question put to you.
Did you have another credible source to dispute the figures from 1992?
Answer: No you don't.
You just stay on the losing side.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 04:23:17 PM |
|
|
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out to
be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your ***** once
again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered. It was in every news source during that period
of time and is well known.
Now answer the question, or will you simply once again act like the coward
you are?
Hint: No WMD were ever found.
C'mon coward! Answer a question for a change!
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 05:05:37 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out to
be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your ***** once
again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't. You have NEVER provided one single credible source. So
now we have established you believe anything without verifying the
facts and you lie.
Let me know when you can stop lying, then maybe I will answer your
questions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 06:23:33 PM |
|
|
In News 1163372737.607360.187020@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out
to be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your *****
once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was. Just because you're too ignorant to have paid attention when it
was happening doesn't mean the rest of us are going to do your homework for
you. You confuse Bush and Cheney's shrill voices as what was a
violation for what the UN actually said without question, partisan hack.
Hint: A UN Resolution requires an agreement of the entire UN Security
Counsel, and a violation finding requires the same agreement. Not just Bush
prancing about and screaming.
That is the answer to your question. If a low class prison guard is too
stupid to figure it out, tough.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 07:20:00 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163372737.607360.187020@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out
to be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your *****
once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was. Just because you're too ignorant to have paid attention when it
was happening doesn't mean the rest of us are going to do your homework for
you. You confuse Bush and Cheney's shrill voices as what was a
violation for what the UN actually said without question, partisan hack.
Hint: A UN Resolution requires an agreement of the entire UN Security
Counsel, and a violation finding requires the same agreement. Not just Bush
prancing about and screaming.
You were asked to provide credible sources to debunk my statement, you
have failed to do so. Why do you insist on making yourself look more
foolish?
That is the answer to your question. If a low class prison guard is too
stupid to figure it out, tough.
Now there is a sign of weakness, you attack a position. You haven't
even a clue as to what a prison gaurd does or the many different
functions that the career holds. Let alone, you failed the entrance
exam, maybe that's why you hold such angry resentment.
Well, maybe if you tried to apply yourself you could get away from your
job at the Royal Farms. By the way, you guys suck at having the coffee
ready.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 07:28:36 PM |
|
|
In News 1163380800.551321.239590@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163372737.607360.187020@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out
to be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your *****
once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was. Just because you're too ignorant to have paid attention
when it was happening doesn't mean the rest of us are going to do
your homework for you. You confuse Bush and Cheney's shrill
voices as what was a violation for what the UN actually said
without question, partisan hack. Hint: A UN Resolution requires an
agreement of the entire UN Security Counsel, and a violation finding
requires the same agreement. Not just Bush prancing about and
screaming.
You were asked
You were asked to answer a number of questions that you chose to ignore.
Too bad you're too much of a republican stooge to have paid attention to
what was happening at the time.
Now there is a sign of weakness,
LOL! Your entire mentality is a portrait of weakness, fool.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 07:43:27 PM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163380800.551321.239590@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163372737.607360.187020@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned out
to be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your *****
once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was. Just because you're too ignorant to have paid attention
when it was happening doesn't mean the rest of us are going to do
your homework for you. You confuse Bush and Cheney's shrill
voices as what was a violation for what the UN actually said
without question, partisan hack. Hint: A UN Resolution requires an
agreement of the entire UN Security Counsel, and a violation finding
requires the same agreement. Not just Bush prancing about and
screaming.
You were asked
You were asked to answer a number of questions that you chose to ignore.
Too bad you're too much of a republican stooge to have paid attention to
what was happening at the time.
You lost the debate. I provided the source, you provided nothing.
Stop whining.
Now there is a sign of weakness,
LOL! Your entire mentality is a portrait of weakness, fool.
You're embarrassed...well you should be. First you attack something
you know nothing about, then you allowed me to reveal your so called
career at Royal Farms where you can't even make a decent pot of
coffee!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 08:11:37 PM |
|
|
In News 1163382207.331501.98320@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163380800.551321.239590@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163372737.607360.187020@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Andrealphus wrote:
In News 1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about
Saddams 17 U.N. Violations.
Two questions put your in your place on that argument.
Which governing authority had the authority to rulet hat Saddam
violated 17 UN Resolutions?
Hint: The UN
Which governing authority has ruled that Saddam violated 17 UN
Resolutions?
Hint: It wasn't the UN.
The UN tentatively said he violated two, and even that turned
out to be erroneous over time.
Can you name the two? We know you are talking out of your *****
once again.
And one MAJOR question was put to you.
Which was already answered.
No, it wasn't.
Yes it was. Just because you're too ignorant to have paid
attention when it was happening doesn't mean the rest of us are
going to do your homework for you. You confuse Bush and
Cheney's shrill voices as what was a violation for what the UN
actually said without question, partisan hack. Hint: A UN
Resolution requires an agreement of the entire UN Security
Counsel, and a violation finding requires the same agreement. Not
just Bush prancing about and screaming.
You were asked
You were asked to answer a number of questions that you chose to
ignore. Too bad you're too much of a republican stooge to have paid
attention to what was happening at the time.
You lost the debate.
LOL! You're a fool.
Now there is a sign of weakness,
LOL! Your entire mentality is a portrait of weakness, fool.
You're embarrassed...
Not at all. You're wrong, and you're too much of a coward to admit it.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 07:29:26 PM |
|
|
In article <1163380800.551321.239590@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You were asked to provide credible sources to debunk my statement
he didn't need to debunk it. you made the claim. then you failed to
support it.
according to your own words:
"Your statement is to be considered a lie until you
can prove it to be true."
"osprey" in <1161104485.981302.246...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 04:11:12 PM |
|
|
after getting caught lying again,
In article <1163368689.194301.194910@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
You lost, which is nothing unusual for you. Debate, as far as you and
I are concerned...over.
typical coward bobby: get caught lying, declare victory, and run away.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Exposed: Homosexual Child Molesters |
12 Nov 2006 11:55:18 AM |
|
|
In article <1163331972.605576.321040@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[..]
Well, it's no different than your last attempt to argue about Saddams
17 U.N. Violations.
he didn't have to document your claim, which, by your own admission
shown below, was a lie.
"Your statement is to be considered a lie until you
can prove it to be true."
"osprey" in <1161104485.981302.246...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
