Exposing the Democrats



 Science > Abortion > Exposing the Democrats

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Xomicron"
Date: 23 Jul 2004 09:39:01 AM
Object: Exposing the Democrats
President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.
When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim? Many prominent
Democrats, including Tom Daschle, attended the premiere of Moore・s
cinematic screed, and the Congressional Black Caucus is sponsoring a
screening of it at the Democratic National Convention. By comparison,
Milhouse, a scathing documentary about Nixon, received nowhere near the
critical acclaim, political recognition or box office returns of Fahrenheit
911.
The Clinton Chronicles, an anti-Clinton film, was never released
theatrically, was sold mostly via direct mail, and never received support
from any prominent Republican elected officials. In fact, many GOP
politicians did everything they could to distance themselves from it.
The hatred among Democrats and others for President Bush rivals their
earlier abhorrence for Nixon, and is approaching the hatred that large
numbers of Americans had for Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt. This
loathing manifests itself in many ways.
The President is hounded at a press conference to admit mistakes in his war
plan, so that David Gregory and Terry Moran can squeal on the air that
President Bush admitted he was wrong. Sen. John Kerry undoubtedly has a
ready-made TV ad, awaiting only the insertion of a freshly-minted clip from
a Presidential press conference.
Most major media give short shrift and non-graphic coverage to the gruesome
beheadings of Americans in favor of screaming headlines and redundant
pictures of a minor military prison scandal that is currently being handled
with military efficiency.
Rich Lowry of National Review Online calls attention to the media-driven
perception of President Bush as a dimwitted fool or a mastermind shyster
capable of astonishing corruption and deceit, depending on which side of
the bed Peter Jennings awakes each morning. The President・s decision to
hand over sovereignty to a free Iraq -- a major event in the history of the
world -- is reported and forgotten in a day or two.
Organizations made up of extreme radicals, such as MoveOn.org, a group that
routinely compares the President to Adolph Hitler, have suddenly and
inexplicably moved beyond the nut margin, treated by Democrats and the
media as a legitimate organization because they happen to give Al Gore a
platform from which to rail.
Kerry, John Edwards, Gore, and their ilk are seldom, if ever, asked to
bridge the disconnect between their former hawkish stances on Iraq, the
availability of weapons of mass destruction to Saddam Hussein, and how it
was the President deceived them by using the same information they used to
make the case for action against Iraq in 1998, and even in 2002 and 2003.
Democrats are allowed to merrily imply that the President lied to them and
to the nation at large, though this canard is beginning to unravel before
their eyes.
President Bush is constantly accused of running a racist government worthy
of the Confederacy by Julian Bond, Kwesi Mfume, and the NAACP, though it is
difficult to imagine Jefferson Davis appointing African Americans to two of
the most important positions within that government. Yet the President is
roundly criticized for declining an invitation from the NAACP to be jeered
and booed at their annual convention, as if his appearance would placate
:the community; in the first place.
In this environment of constant howling against the administration, it is
easy to become discouraged, and to think that President Bush will be
defeated in November. Yet the situation is not so grave.
As Richard Baehr adroitly points out, John Kerry・s mere public presence has
a damaging effect on his campaign. His public utterances are so boring and
useless that his own wife looks as if she・d rather be capping ketchup
bottles on the line rather than listen to Kerry talk. Kerry has said almost
nothing memorable or of significance, and has no coherent plan for Iraq or
the war on terrorism. In fact, Kerry・s speeches are devoid of anything
regarding the war on terrorism save for some nonsense about restoring
America・s standing among our :allies.; Kerry acts as if he does not realize
a war is being waged and that he was in outer space on September 11, 2001.
His alarmist notions of the American economy are at odds with the facts.
On the stump campaigning for the vice presidency, Sen. John Edwards is
positively Jeffersonian. The steady reminder that this self-made
millionaire is the son of a mill worker puts one in mind of America・s
favorite rags-to-riches dry cleaner, George Jefferson, who never hesitated
mentioning to anyone who would listen that he :was born the son of a
sharecropper.; Yet like his running mate, Edwards looks like he could be
President until he opens his mouth. During the Democratic primaries, he
clearly was not well versed in foreign policy issues, and even had trouble
grasping the nuances of domestic legislation such as the Defense of
Marriage Act.
Once the summer has passed, the Olympic torch has been extinguished, and
football begins, the nation will begin to focus intently on the race, and
the most important aspect of the race in this video-driven culture V the
debates. The debates will showcase the ineptitude of Kerry and Edwards, and
remind voters why they should have confidence in the Bush-Cheney
administration.
Those who underestimate the President・s ability to not only hold his own
during a debate against Kerry, but also effectively argue the case for his
leadership, do so at their own peril. Michael Kelly famously wrote that
Gore lost his first debate with then-governor Bush by a nose V the one Gore
spent the entire evening looking down. While it did not seem possible in
the aftermath of that debacle, the Democratic Party is going to nominate a
man whose opinion of himself makes Gore look sheepishly modest. Kerry・s
obvious disdain for the President will not serve him well on the debate
podium, and he, like Gore, will have difficulty hiding his condescension.
As in 2000, the President will come across as competent, confident,
steadfast, and the guy with whom most people would like to sit down to
dinner V barbecue in Crawford, of course.
Likewise, Vice President ***** Cheney・s calm, measured presence during the
lone vice presidential debate will make Edwards look like the neophyte that
he is, and demonstrate Cheney・s effectiveness as perhaps the strongest vice
president in the nation・s history. Watching Cheney logically and reasonably
defend the administration・s policies, it will be difficult to imagine
Edwards playing a similar role should he and Kerry win. Voters will be
reminded of why Cheney is a better candidate than Edwards: Cheney has the
qualifications and the know-how to assume the Presidency.

Despite all of that, Kerry and Edwards could somehow win. The record of the
American electorate is not exactly perfect V Buchanan, Harding, and Carter
have all been elected President. The hatred drummed up by enemies of the
administration is not to be disregarded. But supporters of the President
should resolutely march on realizing that, side-by-side, the Bush-Cheney
team will expose Kerry and Edwards for who they are in front of the entire
nation. Be patient.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3698
.

User: "Family Man"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 02:38:33 PM
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics

And he should be tried in a war crimes court, then sentenced to death for
the murder of over 900 of our kids and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

No other president has ever been such a moron.
.
User: "Henru! Rustic"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 24 Jul 2004 02:06:20 AM
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:38:33 -0400, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> blurted:

"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics



And he should be tried in a war crimes court, then sentenced to death for
the murder of over 900 of our kids and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

I'm pretty sure you could not care less about America's kids, but your love for
mozlum terrorists is standard leftist spew. After all, liberals hate America.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?



No other president has ever been such a moron.

Yale would grajumacate a moron? If so, then how much more of a m0r00n ewe are,
ewe dammmmmmm community college reject!
.


User: "Mr. N"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 03:32:55 PM
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon.

FYI - Nixon was a criminal piece of *****, too.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

Never. That should tell you something about your corrupt, mentally retarded
hero.

The hatred among Democrats and others for President Bush rivals their
earlier abhorrence for Nixon

You say that like it's a bad thing.
--
-Mr. N
-------------------------------------------
"I believe that the president's leadership in the actions taken in Iraq
demonstrate an incompetence in terms of knowledge, judgment and experience
in making the decisions that would have been necessary to truly accomplish
the mission without the deaths to our troops and the cost to our taxpayers."
"The emperor has no clothes. When are people going to face the reality?
Pull this curtain back."
-Nancy Pelosi, American Patriot
.
User: "madmax"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 05:14:46 PM
Mr. N wrote:

"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon.



FYI - Nixon was a criminal piece of *****, too.


When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?



Never. That should tell you something about your corrupt, mentally retarded
hero.


The hatred among Democrats and others for President Bush rivals their
earlier abhorrence for Nixon



You say that like it's a bad thing.

"I was not lying. I said things that later on seemed to be untrue."
-Richard M. Nixon
--
To help you stay safe see: http://www.geocities.com/maxpro4u/madmax.html
This message is virus free as far as I can tell.
Change nomail.afraid.org to neo.rr.com so you can reply
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in Usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
.

User: "Henru! Rustic"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 24 Jul 2004 02:10:46 AM
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:32:55 -0700, "Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com>
blurted:


"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon.


FYI - Nixon was a criminal piece of *****, too.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?


Never. That should tell you something about your corrupt, mentally retarded
hero.

The hatred among Democrats and others for President Bush rivals their
earlier abhorrence for Nixon


You say that like it's a bad thing.

Yes, it is. I wish Homeland Security would come pick you left-wing enemies of
America up, dump you off at Gitmo, and force ewe to wear panties on yur heads
while taking pictures.
.
User: "Mr. N"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 24 Jul 2004 11:43:06 AM
"Henru! Rustic" <@ Z. > wrote in message
news:fn24g0p97186mo5ki8kjt997ko3ttfb40i@news-server.satx.rr.com...

The hatred among Democrats and others for President Bush rivals their
earlier abhorrence for Nixon


You say that like it's a bad thing.


Yes, it is. I wish Homeland Security would come pick you left-wing enemies

of

America up, dump you off at Gitmo, and force ewe to wear panties on yur

heads

while taking pictures.

So let me get this straight:
You believe that the United States of America should amend the Constitution
(you'd have to eliminate a number of Amendments in the Bill of Rights as
well as several Articles) so that people who express hatred of the President
of the United States (any party? or only when the President is a Republican)
should be rounded up by the government and shipped off to a military base in
a foreign country.
Why do you hate America, traitor?
--
-Mr. N
***************************************
"While we may not support the President's ill-advised war, we do support our
troops. . Without any coherent international blueprint, the White House has
bombed its way around the globe while dropping troops far and wide for
ill-defined peacemaking duties. This policy has gutted the American
military, which now must be rebuilt."
-Republican RepresentativeTom DeLay May 14, 1999
.



User: "Rev. Pigpen"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 10:07:54 AM
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

<snip>
WAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaah.
(and republicans say that democrats are whiners)
.
User: "Chuck"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 12:00:15 PM

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his

opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes

of

which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.

Probably not. The press was much more brutal to politicians earlier in our
country's history than it is now.


When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the

United

States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

Well, as propaganda, it is pretty good. And about half the country agrees
with the film's basic premise - that GWB is an idiot heading a country
surrounded by too many people with ties to the oil indutry and Saudi Arabia.
Add that hype is built surrounding the film since the director has an
Academy Award for a previous documentary and the buzz the film got overseas
and that Disney made public that they didn't want to release it - of course
it has been huge phenomenon. It says a lot about the Bush presidency,
whether you like him or not, that a film so scathing would be so popular.
Whether you like him or not, there is no denying that this country has
become increasingly divided and polarized under his leadership.
.
User: "Henru! Rustic"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 24 Jul 2004 02:02:37 AM
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:15 GMT, "Chuck" <nicklow_nospam@mindspring.com>
blurted:

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his

opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes

of

which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.


Probably not. The press was much more brutal to politicians earlier in our
country's history than it is now.



When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the

United

States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?


Well, as propaganda, it is pretty good. And about half the country agrees
with the film's basic premise - that GWB is an idiot heading a country
surrounded by too many people with ties to the oil indutry and Saudi Arabia.
Add that hype is built surrounding the film since the director has an
Academy Award for a previous documentary and the buzz the film got overseas
and that Disney made public that they didn't want to release it - of course
it has been huge phenomenon. It says a lot about the Bush presidency,
whether you like him or not, that a film so scathing would be so popular.
Whether you like him or not, there is no denying that this country has
become increasingly divided and polarized under his leadership.

Michael Moore wishes he had even a fraction of the credibility the Honourable
President George W. Bush has with the American people.
.
User: "Chuck"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 29 Jul 2004 06:20:51 PM

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his

opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the

likes

of

which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it

is

unprecedented.


Probably not. The press was much more brutal to politicians earlier in

our

country's history than it is now.



When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film

like

Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the

United

States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?


Well, as propaganda, it is pretty good. And about half the country agrees
with the film's basic premise - that GWB is an idiot heading a country
surrounded by too many people with ties to the oil indutry and Saudi

Arabia.

Add that hype is built surrounding the film since the director has an
Academy Award for a previous documentary and the buzz the film got

overseas

and that Disney made public that they didn't want to release it - of

course

it has been huge phenomenon. It says a lot about the Bush presidency,
whether you like him or not, that a film so scathing would be so popular.
Whether you like him or not, there is no denying that this country has
become increasingly divided and polarized under his leadership.


Michael Moore wishes he had even a fraction of the credibility the

Honourable

President George W. Bush has with the American people.

A fraction? I'd say at least 1/4 of the country agrees with Michael Moore!
.




User: "Dr_Postman"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 11:34:56 AM
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:39:01 -0400, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.

I miss the good old days when major government hearings were over a
*****.
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com
"Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?"
- Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how
sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time.
.

User: "Harry"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 02:49:42 PM
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local>...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation・s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

I believe it was the last time our sitting president was a primary
candidate for war crimes indictments at the International War Crimes
Tribunal in the Hague. Fortunately, President Cheney probably won't
live long enough to stand trial.


http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3698

So, the "americanthinker.com" (sic) is funded by Scaife, or Murdoch?
Just wondering.
.
User: "Henru! Rustic"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 24 Jul 2004 02:08:04 AM
On 23 Jul 2004 12:49:42 -0700,
(Harry) blurted:

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local>...

President George W. Bush has endured an onslaught of attacks from his
opponents and critics in the nation??s dominant media organs, the likes of
which have not been seen since the days of Richard Nixon. Perhaps it is
unprecedented.

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?


I believe it was the last time our sitting president was a primary
candidate for war crimes indictments at the International War Crimes
Tribunal in the Hague. Fortunately, President Cheney probably won't
live long enough to stand trial.

Is that the same sham of an organization that says Israel has no right to
defend itself from izlomist terrorism?
.


User: "Kenny"

Title: Re: Exposing the Democrats 23 Jul 2004 11:13:23 PM
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<fa25xleuytcj.dlg@alaska.local>...

When was the last time, if ever, that a mendacious propaganda film like
Fahrenheit 911, aimed squarely against the sitting President of the United
States, received such widespread attention and acclaim?

Rush Limbaugh has been receiving "widespread attention" for a long
time. (I don't know about acclaim though...)

The President is hounded at a press conference to admit mistakes in his war
plan, so that David Gregory and Terry Moran can squeal on the air that
President Bush admitted he was wrong.

As was Clinton was hounded about the blue dress, etc. Nothing new.

Sen. John Kerry undoubtedly has a
ready-made TV ad, awaiting only the insertion of a freshly-minted clip from
a Presidential press conference.

This writer is making accusations against things he THINKS Kerry has?
He has no actual material to criticize, does he?

Rich Lowry of National Review Online calls attention to the media-driven
perception of President Bush as a dimwitted fool or a mastermind shyster
capable of astonishing corruption and deceit, depending on which side of
the bed Peter Jennings awakes each morning. The President??s decision to
hand over sovereignty to a free Iraq -- a major event in the history of the
world -- is reported and forgotten in a day or two.

If he handed over actual power, maybe it would have gotten more press.
Nobody cares about a symbolic gesture.

Organizations made up of extreme radicals, such as MoveOn.org, a group that
routinely compares the President to Adolph Hitler,

This is a complete lie. MoveOn.Org had a contest where people were
invited to submit ads. Two of the submissions compared Bush to Hitler.
MoveOn.Org pulled the ads from their web site.
But apparently it's OK for the Bush campaign to use those same images
of Hitler in THEIR ad:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-06-27-bush-hitler-ad_x.htm
The rest is just wishful thinking which I'll ignore.
K
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER