| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"George" |
| Date: |
07 Dec 2005 05:37:02 PM |
| Object: |
Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
< http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/07/airplane.gunshot/index.html>
MIAMI, Florida (CNN) -- A 44-year-old U.S. citizen who claimed to have
a bomb was shot and killed when air marshals opened fire on a boarding
bridge at the Miami airport, several sources told CNN.
.
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:17:54 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that, I was hoping you
wouldn't have caught it for about another post or two.
Well, I guess I am entitled to a "typo" card like you used all those
times you misspelled words.
It's a TYPO!!!
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and repeating it
a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a left-handed Dvorak
keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on that keyboard. (That's
obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard that most of us use.) You're
still a sod unable to write very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from
you, but you can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and
"two" quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much
less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:25:09 PM |
|
|
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that, I was hoping you
wouldn't have caught it for about another post or two.
Well, I guess I am entitled to a "typo" card like you used all those
times you misspelled words.
It's a TYPO!!!
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and repeating it
a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a left-handed Dvorak
keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on that keyboard. (That's
obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard that most of us use.) You're
still a sod unable to write very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from
you, but you can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and
"two" quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much
less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on
that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard
that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write very legibly.
No one's expecting perfection from you, but you can't even figure out
the difference between "to", "too", and "two" quite often. That does
nothing to make you look any more credible, much less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder why
you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Rochester 2 (December 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, December 10 at Hamilton, 6:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 01:06:42 PM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on
that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard
that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write very legibly.
No one's expecting perfection from you, but you can't even figure out
the difference between "to", "too", and "two" quite often. That does
nothing to make you look any more credible, much less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder why
you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 10:17:20 PM |
|
|
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on
that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard
that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write very
legibly. No one's expecting perfection from you, but you can't even
figure out the difference between "to", "too", and "two" quite often.
That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much less
respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder
why you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to be
calling that number. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Hamilton 7, Houston 1 (December 10)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, December 11 at Cleveland, 4:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 04:46:43 AM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on
that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard
that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write very
legibly. No one's expecting perfection from you, but you can't even
figure out the difference between "to", "too", and "two" quite often.
That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much less
respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder
why you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to be
calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 11:18:55 PM |
|
|
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent
on that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes
keyboard that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write
very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from you, but you
can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and "two"
quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible,
much less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder
why you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to be
calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no problem.
;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 11:28:18 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 12:57:15 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
[...]
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and
repeating it a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a
left-handed Dvorak keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent
on that keyboard. (That's obviously not the case on the Sholes
keyboard that most of us use.) You're still a sod unable to write
very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from you, but you
can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and "two"
quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible,
much less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
Small world, eh? So do hers.
The information that was sent to me suggest that you were one of those
wacko's on the Jerry Springer show that had to go through several
different men to get parental tests done and you still don't know who
the daddy is.
Suggest, eh? So, you just took that idea and ran with it...and you wonder
why you get no respect.
Seriously, get that help I suggested. I am worried about you, I think
you might snap one day getting all worried about what "osprey" is
saying or thinking.
Since "osprey" == "Robert Heishman", have fun convincing your supposed
personal attorney that the truth is defamatory.
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to be
calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no problem.
;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 11:48:22 PM |
|
|
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to
be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no problem.
;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 11:52:17 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going to
be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no problem.
;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
11 Dec 2005 11:59:30 PM |
|
|
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going
to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
12 Dec 2005 12:04:02 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_ going
to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--and 617, don't forget!
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
12 Dec 2005 12:39:33 AM |
|
|
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_
going to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--and 617, don't forget!
....not to mention 339, 781, and 857 as well. ;-)
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
Funny, how that was his first response - when I never said he did anything
illegal, to begin with...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
12 Dec 2005 01:06:06 AM |
|
|
On 12 Dec 2005 00:39:33 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_
going to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--make that 978, for the MA area code. (The 979--well, we know who
that belongs to, don't we.)
--and 617, don't forget!
...not to mention 339, 781, and 857 as well. ;-)
Oh, and don't forget 413 and 508, depending where I am. If you get one
from a 416, chances are, it might be me, too--but you'll know in
advance, either way.
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
Funny, how that was his first response - when I never said he did anything
illegal, to begin with...
Guilty conscience, that little *****! ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
12 Dec 2005 11:05:03 PM |
|
|
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 12 Dec 2005 00:39:33 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_
going to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--make that 978, for the MA area code. (The 979--well, we know who
that belongs to, don't we.)
--and 617, don't forget!
...not to mention 339, 781, and 857 as well. ;-)
Oh, and don't forget 413 and 508, depending where I am. If you get one
from a 416, chances are, it might be me, too--but you'll know in
advance, either way.
Add 774 to that, since if you're in 508, you're also in 774...and add 289 to
416 (which is small enough that you could be in 905 as well at times).
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
Funny, how that was his first response - when I never said he did anything
illegal, to begin with...
Guilty conscience, that little *****! ;-)
He's got a conscience? ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
13 Dec 2005 01:32:53 AM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 12 Dec 2005 00:39:33 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware _isn't_
going to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site, no
problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--make that 978, for the MA area code. (The 979--well, we know who
that belongs to, don't we.)
--and 617, don't forget!
...not to mention 339, 781, and 857 as well. ;-)
Oh, and don't forget 413 and 508, depending where I am. If you get one
from a 416, chances are, it might be me, too--but you'll know in
advance, either way.
Add 774 to that, since if you're in 508, you're also in 774...and add 289 to
416 (which is small enough that you could be in 905 as well at times).
Oh my word--I did not realize that Massachusetts had so many area
codes. When I left USA. there were only four. Now there's twice that:
339, 351, 413, 508, 617, 774, 781, 857, 978
http://www.allareacodes.com/massachusetts_area_codes.htm
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of phones
ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
Funny, how that was his first response - when I never said he did anything
illegal, to begin with...
Guilty conscience, that little *****! ;-)
He's got a conscience? ;-)
You have a point.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
13 Dec 2005 02:32:06 PM |
|
|
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 12 Dec 2005 00:39:33 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"Gaia" <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
On 10 Dec 2005 22:17:20 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Gaia <starchaser@inorbit.com> writes:
[...]
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
It's a pretty good bet that one DoC employee in Delaware
_isn't_ going to be calling that number. ;-)
;-)
No calls, yet. :-)
As long as I don't see any calls from 302 at my voicemail site,
no problem. ;-)
I haven't received any, either, from the 302 area.
I received a call, though--from somebody else, somewhere else. :-))
If it's from 606, no problem. If it's from 502, problem. ;-)
Tahahaha. Right.
Of course, 713, 940, and 979 are welcome, I hope. ;_)
--make that 978, for the MA area code. (The 979--well, we know who
that belongs to, don't we.)
--and 617, don't forget!
...not to mention 339, 781, and 857 as well. ;-)
Oh, and don't forget 413 and 508, depending where I am. If you get one
from a 416, chances are, it might be me, too--but you'll know in
advance, either way.
Add 774 to that, since if you're in 508, you're also in 774...and add 289 to
416 (which is small enough that you could be in 905 as well at times).
Oh my word--I did not realize that Massachusetts had so many area
codes. When I left USA. there were only four. Now there's twice that:
339, 351, 413, 508, 617, 774, 781, 857, 978
http://www.allareacodes.com/massachusetts_area_codes.htm
That's indirectly a result of the evolution of telephone companies, combined
with the Rube Goldberg method of assigning office codes to areas. There are
about 7,920,000 possible valid numbers in a given area code, but because of
the way they were assigned - 10,000 at a time, at a minimum - it was possible
to completely fill up the area code with fewer than 800 lines, in an extreme
case. That's since been revised to a thousand numbers, which has slowed down
the need for new area codes. (I got to watch that here, as well - when I
first came here forty years ago, six area codes were more than enough for the
whole state. Now, what used to be covered by 713 has six different codes
inhabiting it, with the original 713 shrunk to basically inside Beltway
8...and that's overlaid by two other codes. Dallas has gone through the same
process with two extra, Fort Worth has one extra, and Austin will be getting
an overlay some time in the next couple of years.) When I was home in
Kentucky last year, I had a tendency to dial all calls as ten
digits...fortunately, I didn't make very many.
Well, if it's from 206, I don't think it'd be a problem. I can handle
that caller. If it's from 864, _that caller_ might have a problem.
At least he didn't leave a message when he called here, a couple of
phones ago...
Oh, yes--I remember that fiasco; "I didn't do anything illegal."
Funny, how that was his first response - when I never said he did anything
illegal, to begin with...
Guilty conscience, that little *****! ;-)
He's got a conscience? ;-)
You have a point.
....which puts me that much farther ahead of him, for whatever that's
worth. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Cleveland 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 16 vs. Peoria, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:35:18 PM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 10:25:09 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that, I was hoping you
wouldn't have caught it for about another post or two.
Well, I guess I am entitled to a "typo" card like you used all those
times you misspelled words.
It's a TYPO!!!
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and repeating it
a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a left-handed Dvorak
keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on that keyboard. (That's
obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard that most of us use.) You're
still a sod unable to write very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from
you, but you can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and
"two" quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much
less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
At least my children--who "do know who their daddy is"--aren't jilted
because of their gender or your relationship with their mother.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:40:12 PM |
|
|
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:25:09 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that, I was hoping you
wouldn't have caught it for about another post or two.
Well, I guess I am entitled to a "typo" card like you used all those
times you misspelled words.
It's a TYPO!!!
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and repeating it
a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a left-handed Dvorak
keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on that keyboard. (That's
obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard that most of us use.) You're
still a sod unable to write very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from
you, but you can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and
"two" quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much
less respectable.
Coming from a boy who read a post I made ...
Which one of YOUR boys are posting? I'll bet little Devon is more
literate than you.
At least my children know who their daddy is.
At least my children--who "do know who their daddy is"--aren't jilted
because of their gender or your relationship with their mother.
At least I know where my children are..:o)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:47:56 PM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 10:40:12 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
At least I know where my children are..:o)
Yes, not with you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:16:47 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that, I was hoping you
wouldn't have caught it for about another post or two.
Well, I guess I am entitled to a "typo" card like you used all those
times you misspelled words.
It's a TYPO!!!
She doesn't make them on a regular basis like you do, Spud...and repeating it
a couple of times is a typo? Only if you're using a left-handed Dvorak
keyboard, maybe, since "i" and "e" are adjacent on that keyboard. (That's
obviously not the case on the Sholes keyboard that most of us use.) You're
still a sod unable to write very legibly. No one's expecting perfection from
you, but you can't even figure out the difference between "to", "too", and
"two" quite often. That does nothing to make you look any more credible, much
less respectable.
Indeed.
(Chicken parmesean is in the oven!)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 11:35:47 AM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 09:21:06 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that,
I actually caught it the first time I saw it--in this thread.
Do you not remember the many words you blundered...I figured
misspelling blackmail...
You didn't misspell blackmale. But it is funny you let that slip
during our discussion about your crossdressing past.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 11:46:36 AM |
|
|
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 09:21:06 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that,
I actually caught it the first time I saw it--in this thread.
Do you not remember the many words you blundered...I figured
misspelling blackmail...
You didn't misspell blackmale. But it is funny you let that slip
during our discussion about your crossdressing past.
Take note: Gaia is scared, she is embarrassed, so much so she had to
snip out ALL those misspellings and grammar errors of hers from the
past.
She is "scared"
Poor Gaia
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 11:53:11 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 09:21:06 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that,
I actually caught it the first time I saw it--in this thread.
Do you not remember the many words you blundered...I figured
misspelling blackmail...
You didn't misspell blackmale. But it is funny you let that slip
during our discussion about your crossdressing past.
Take note: Gaia is scared, she is embarrassed, so much...
Poor osprey is projecting, again. he doesn't want the world to know
what an incredible idiot he is. Too late.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 01:33:12 PM |
|
|
Gaia wrote:
osprey wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 09:21:06 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 10:34:37 -0600, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences" unless they
make ammends with you does in fact constitute a threat..and blackmale.
So much for Wilmington College's effort to educate you...
Indeed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail
Maybe it's the "blackmale" he lusts...
Darn, it only took you two posts to catch that,
I actually caught it the first time I saw it--in this thread.
Do you not remember the many words you blundered...I figured
misspelling blackmail...
You didn't misspell blackmale. But it is funny you let that slip
during our discussion about your crossdressing past.
Take note: Gaia is scared, she is embarrassed, so much...
Poor osprey is projecting, again. he doesn't want the world to know
what an incredible idiot he is. Too late.
such a loser that boy is.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 12:54:38 PM |
|
|
On 2005-12-10 12:21:06 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> said:
Oh, remember your claims that I "made" up my grades and my Deans List
certifications.
what about your lie about mimi shown below?
"To anyone reading my words let it be known that Mimi Cohen is aka:
Krisblake, Pauline, Gia, Somewriter, and several other nicks."
--"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
news:1130988022.230071.12110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gaia" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 11:00:18 AM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2005 08:19:19 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:03:21 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 03:28:21 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 9 Dec 2005 23:02:16 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 9 Dec 2005 04:40:25 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 8 Dec 2005 22:35:35 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:30:02 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
George wrote:
On 2005-12-08 06:22:52 -0800, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> said:
George wrote:
< http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/07/airplane.gunshot/index.html>
MIAMI, Florida (CNN) -- A 44-year-old U.S. citizen who claimed to have
a bomb was shot and killed when air marshals opened fire on a boarding
bridge at the Miami airport, several sources told CNN.
And how, precisely, were they to know that he did not have a bomb?
Is that the default position? Shoot first and ask questions later?
George, by any chance did you sleep through the last 4 1/2 years? If you
want to blame someone for a kook getting shot maybe you should blame his
sister (the one who claimed he was crazy and unmedicated) for not making
sure he was taking his medication. It's really easy to be a Monday
morning quarterback and condemning a guy who did the job he was hired
and trained to do. Yes, protecting the passengers, crew and plane from
terrorists *IS* the "default position". I suppose you'd have been
happier if the Marshall didn't do his job and the fruitcake did have a
bomb and blew up the plane on the ground killing everyone on board and
in the airport because it had full fuel tanks? If that had happened
you'd be bitching that more people died, wouldn't you?
The *fruitcake* didn't have a bomb.
Oh how sensitive you are.
I'm very sensistive.
No you are not,
I am.
you are a lying sack of *****.
No, I am not you.
Especially when people are alleged to have said
something that hasn't been corroberated by anybody else but the people
who subdued him with bullets.
The man supposably had a mental illness,
He did, you moron. A very serious one.
And you moron, called him a "fruitcake".
At least mock me properly, fruitcake. (Now _that_ is calling you
fruitcake.)
and
you call him a fruitcake.
I didn't call him fruitcake in the context you think I have.
Oh you slime buckets
This is highly amusing coming somebody who'd stoop as low as taking
credit for military honors you haven't earned.
Contact the Pentagon and file a grievance...and if you can get my
records changed..go for it.
I'll bet Yanya's proud.
The new site will be up and running, soon enough.
And???
That's your childishness...so what is one supposed to do?
;-) You'll see, boet.
And???
You'll see, boet. :-)
Right.
Read my other post runt,
Crossdresser, you're scared.
There you go with that fetish again.
You're the one who prefers women's hosiery--we all know it.
Hmm, interesting...I didn't know that...wow. You would have thought I
would be the first to know.
You don't think, and pretend to not to know. You do remember whining
to Google about your posts, yes?
Will you forge me, again?
Why, are you going to blackmale again?
A Fruedian slip, dear?
;-))
as my predictions in the coming year
The upcoming year will prove very trying, for you, boet.
Right...and as you find that not happening, it will be fun watching
your next temper tantrum.
I should invite you to my graduation..:o)
come true
and all you have is this newsgroup and your fellow runts.
I am pushing you right over the edge,
You're not.
Oh but runt...I am...
...Oh, *****; you're not.
You like ***** or something???
I love my cat. Her name is Julia.
She is smarter than you.
You are being pushed right over the edge.
How so, scaredy-cat?
If you get stupid, that's on you.
You got stupid, it's on you, and you've yet to make ammends.
And you don't dictate and control...
You're right; I don't.
You are right..
Of course I don't. I am not a control-freakish *****.
You are
...not.
We can go back and forth all day on that..but ...
....you're too much a chickenshit chickenhawk.
[...]
you don't so stop trying.
I never said that. Of course, leave it up to Robert heishman to lie
about what people said.
You are the one who is making silly "demands".
Enjoy the new website, when it's posted.
And when is it going to be posted?
Very soon...
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
And?
:-))
I have nothing tomake ammends for.
That's your choice. However, suffer the consequences of it.
Oh my....now it's suffering the consequences...
You will be, prison schmuck.
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences"...
So you are feeling threatened.
[...]
[...]
I don't
have a prejudice against people who have bonafide mental illness.
Naa, you just call them "fruitcakes".
No, I don't call them "'fruitckaes.'" You and Johnny are the
exceptions, though.
Yes, you do, you did in this case. So stop lying
Stop lying.
I
just mock and wreck kooks bonafide dishonest fruitcakes like you.
Awww...why don't you go and type another post claiming I am
"scared"...ROFL
I don't need to. It's apprent you're very scared.
Of what???
You are delusional
ROFL
Tanya and Valerie have made you frightened, too, eh?
You sure like to think you scare people,
You _are_ scared.
See what I mean?
LOL
I do; you're scared shitless.
Intimidation attempt?
No attempts. You are already there.
Ahhh..o.k....:o)
Thanks for the admission.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Fanatics Gun Down Innocent Man |
10 Dec 2005 11:13:28 AM |
|
|
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 08:19:19 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:16:13 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 06:03:21 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 10 Dec 2005 03:28:21 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 9 Dec 2005 23:02:16 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 9 Dec 2005 04:40:25 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On 8 Dec 2005 22:35:35 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Gaia wrote:
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:30:02 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
wrote:
George wrote:
On 2005-12-08 06:22:52 -0800, "Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> said:
George wrote:
< http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/07/airplane.gunshot/index.html>
MIAMI, Florida (CNN) -- A 44-year-old U.S. citizen who claimed to have
a bomb was shot and killed when air marshals opened fire on a boarding
bridge at the Miami airport, several sources told CNN.
And how, precisely, were they to know that he did not have a bomb?
Is that the default position? Shoot first and ask questions later?
George, by any chance did you sleep through the last 4 1/2 years? If you
want to blame someone for a kook getting shot maybe you should blame his
sister (the one who claimed he was crazy and unmedicated) for not making
sure he was taking his medication. It's really easy to be a Monday
morning quarterback and condemning a guy who did the job he was hired
and trained to do. Yes, protecting the passengers, crew and plane from
terrorists *IS* the "default position". I suppose you'd have been
happier if the Marshall didn't do his job and the fruitcake did have a
bomb and blew up the plane on the ground killing everyone on board and
in the airport because it had full fuel tanks? If that had happened
you'd be bitching that more people died, wouldn't you?
The *fruitcake* didn't have a bomb.
Oh how sensitive you are.
I'm very sensistive.
No you are not,
I am.
you are a lying sack of *****.
No, I am not you.
Especially when people are alleged to have said
something that hasn't been corroberated by anybody else but the people
who subdued him with bullets.
The man supposably had a mental illness,
He did, you moron. A very serious one.
And you moron, called him a "fruitcake".
At least mock me properly, fruitcake. (Now _that_ is calling you
fruitcake.)
and
you call him a fruitcake.
I didn't call him fruitcake in the context you think I have.
Oh you slime buckets
This is highly amusing coming somebody who'd stoop as low as taking
credit for military honors you haven't earned.
Contact the Pentagon and file a grievance...and if you can get my
records changed..go for it.
I'll bet Yanya's proud.
The new site will be up and running, soon enough.
And???
That's your childishness...so what is one supposed to do?
;-) You'll see, boet.
And???
You'll see, boet. :-)
Right.
Read my other post runt,
Crossdresser, you're scared.
There you go with that fetish again.
You're the one who prefers women's hosiery--we all know it.
Hmm, interesting...I didn't know that...wow. You would have thought I
would be the first to know.
You don't think, and pretend to not to know. You do remember whining
to Google about your posts, yes?
Would you like to call my wife and tell her? Didn't you claim you knew
my phone number?
Will you forge me, again?
Why, are you going to blackmale again?
A Fruedian slip, dear?
Can't get anything past you brainiac...lol
Yes, it's sarcasm..:o)
;-))
as my predictions in the coming year
The upcoming year will prove very trying, for you, boet.
Right...and as you find that not happening, it will be fun watching
your next temper tantrum.
I should invite you to my graduation..:o)
come true
and all you have is this newsgroup and your fellow runts.
I am pushing you right over the edge,
You're not.
Oh but runt...I am...
...Oh, *****; you're not.
You like ***** or something???
I love my cat. Her name is Julia.
She is smarter than you.
And I am smarter than you...so where does that leave you...LOL
You are being pushed right over the edge.
How so, scaredy-cat?
Now, do you really think I am going to tell you everything? Come on, I
am yanking your chains so hard right now, you are close to choking
yourself...I wouldn't dream of telling you too much.
If you get stupid, that's on you.
You got stupid, it's on you, and you've yet to make ammends.
And you don't dictate and control...
You're right; I don't.
You are right..
Of course I don't. I am not a control-freakish *****.
You are
...not.
We can go back and forth all day on that..but ...
...you're too much a chickenshit chickenhawk.
Says the one who is to afraid to come out from behind her computer.
[...]
you don't so stop trying.
I never said that. Of course, leave it up to Robert heishman to lie
about what people said.
You are the one who is making silly "demands".
Enjoy the new website, when it's posted.
And when is it going to be posted?
Very soon...
Oh yea...uh...aren't you going to say I am supposed to make "ammends"
thedecosecret.bravehost.com
And?
:-))
I have nothing tomake ammends for.
That's your choice. However, suffer the consequences of it.
Oh my....now it's suffering the consequences...
You will be, prison schmuck.
Ahh...is that a "threat"?
It's not a "threat."
Really..telling someone they will "suffer the consequences"...
So you are feeling threatened.
By you...no runt..you couldn't hurt me even if you paid someone.
However, someone else may find some of your words very interesting..:o)
[...]
[...]
I don't
have a prejudice against people who have bonafide mental illness.
Naa, you just call them "fruitcakes".
No, I don't call them "'fruitckaes.'" You and Johnny are the
exceptions, though.
Yes, you do, you did in this case. So stop lying
Stop lying.
I
just mock and wreck kooks bonafide dishonest fruitcakes like you.
Awww...why don't you go and type another post claiming I am
"scared"...ROFL
| | |
