Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical



 Science > Abortion > Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Abortion
User: "Mimi Cohen"
Date: 28 Jan 2006 10:29:04 PM
Object: Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical
So why shouldn’t we REALLY treat the Palestinians in a more humane way?
This is a question that we are often asked in the letters people write
us after seeing our presentations – especially the last one on
anti-Semitism.
Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical –
A young woman, a mother of two young infants living in the Gaza Strip,
arrives at the Israeli army checkpoint terminal. Each day this terminal
crossing regulates the entry of 15-20,000 Palestinians into Israel. As
this woman passes through the magnetic gate the alarm goes off. At this
point the soldiers at the gate are instructed to do one of two things:
1) Not allow her to go through the gate, or
2) Take any precautionary measures necessary (including the use of
firearms) in the event that they suspect this person is a suicide
bomber.
In this scenario, the “person” is a woman. Women are treated differently
(you can’t ask them to lift their shirts up). The woman at the magnetic
gate starts crying – saying that she needs to get to the hospital
urgently for treatment. She explains that the reason the metal detector
in the gate sounded the alarm is because she has metal plates in her
leg.
Now, here is the dilemma. There is a woman at the magnetic gate. She has
triggered the alarm. We know that in past months there have been a
number of suicide bombings carried out by women. So what would YOU do in
this situation? What would YOU do if you were the one who has to take
this decision? What action would you take?
Here are your options:
1) Send her away – and prevent her from receiving the treatment she
claims she needs – and, by so doing, eliminate the possibility that she
can activate the bomb in Israel. 2) Accept her explanation, and accept
responsibility for letting her through the checkpoint despite the fact
that she has triggered the alarm, and ask her to accompany you to a
special room where a female officer can make sure that she isn’t
carrying explosives (don’t forget that the metal detector went off as
she passed through).
So what would you do if you were the person in charge of the checkpoint?
The scenario continues. The person in charge, under instructions to make
life easier for the Palestinians needing to pass through the checkpoint,
and especially faced by a woman who claims she needs urgent medical
attention (a mother of two infants, don’t forget), decides to let her
through and accompanies her to a room to be searched by a female
officer. The woman falls over as she enters the room and, as people rush
to help her up, the woman presses the button and activates the 5 kilos
of explosives that she’d been carrying on her body. She blows herself
up, murdering 4 Israelis and wounding a dozen others in the process.
Now, here is the REAL dilemma. What should the soldiers at that terminal
crossing do tomorrow morning? Should they deny entry to the thousands of
Palestinians seeking work in Israel in order to provide for their
families? Based on their experience of the previous day, should they
deny entry to Israel to any person claiming that s/he needs medical
attention? These people, with their crutches, wheelchairs, pacemakers,
etc., are the ones most likely to trigger the alarm on the metal
detector.
Or – should they put this incident behind them, and carry on risking
their lives just because the rest of the world (which isn’t present at
this checkpoint) condemns them for not treating these people in a more
humane way.
We would really like to hear your opinion on this matter. And please
spare us the platitude that we shouldn’t be there in the first place. If
we weren’t there, the suicide bombers would have absolutely free
passage.
http://www.conceptwizard.com/info.html
.

User: "serwad"

Title: Re: Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical 28 Jan 2006 10:46:42 PM
"Mimi Cohen" <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote in message
news:43DC4490.123999D9@cox.net...

So why shouldn't we REALLY treat the Palestinians in a more humane way?

stop your lies you kike witch!
--
When a Jew has gentile in his clutches another jew may go to the same
gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that gentile shall be
ruined. For the property of the gentile, according to our law, belongs to no
one, and the first jew that passes, has full right to seize it.
Talmud, Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical 29 Jan 2006 01:20:03 AM
Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote:

So why shouldn’t we REALLY treat the Palestinians in a more humane way?

Notice the presumption that it's a question even worth asking, as if
Palestinians are the equal of dogs.

This is a question that we are often asked in the letters people write
us after seeing our presentations – especially the last one on
anti-Semitism.

The usual double-standard: Any criticism of Jews is intolerable
anti-semitism but outright persecution of Paletsinians is negotiable.

Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical –

A young woman, a mother of two young infants living in the Gaza Strip,
arrives at the Israeli army checkpoint terminal.

Because the Israelis have Palestinians under military rule and subject
them to searches and checkpoints and generally act like any other
military dictatorship.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "isaac_the_blind"

Title: Re: Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical 28 Jan 2006 11:49:55 PM
Mimi Cohen wrote:

So why shouldn’t we REALLY treat the Palestinians in a more humane way?

This is a question that we are often asked in the letters people write
us after seeing our presentations – especially the last one on
anti-Semitism.

Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical –

A young woman, a mother of two young infants living in the Gaza Strip,
arrives at the Israeli army checkpoint terminal. Each day this terminal
crossing regulates the entry of 15-20,000 Palestinians into Israel. As
this woman passes through the magnetic gate the alarm goes off. At this
point the soldiers at the gate are instructed to do one of two things:
1) Not allow her to go through the gate, or
2) Take any precautionary measures necessary (including the use of
firearms) in the event that they suspect this person is a suicide
bomber.

In this scenario, the “person” is a woman. Women are treated differently
(you can’t ask them to lift their shirts up). The woman at the magnetic
gate starts crying – saying that she needs to get to the hospital
urgently for treatment. She explains that the reason the metal detector
in the gate sounded the alarm is because she has metal plates in her
leg.

Now, here is the dilemma. There is a woman at the magnetic gate. She has
triggered the alarm. We know that in past months there have been a
number of suicide bombings carried out by women. So what would YOU do in
this situation? What would YOU do if you were the one who has to take
this decision? What action would you take?

Here are your options:
1) Send her away – and prevent her from receiving the treatment she
claims she needs – and, by so doing, eliminate the possibility that she
can activate the bomb in Israel. 2) Accept her explanation, and accept
responsibility for letting her through the checkpoint despite the fact
that she has triggered the alarm, and ask her to accompany you to a
special room where a female officer can make sure that she isn’t
carrying explosives (don’t forget that the metal detector went off as
she passed through).

So what would you do if you were the person in charge of the checkpoint?

The scenario continues. The person in charge, under instructions to make
life easier for the Palestinians needing to pass through the checkpoint,
and especially faced by a woman who claims she needs urgent medical
attention (a mother of two infants, don’t forget), decides to let her
through and accompanies her to a room to be searched by a female
officer. The woman falls over as she enters the room and, as people rush
to help her up, the woman presses the button and activates the 5 kilos
of explosives that she’d been carrying on her body. She blows herself
up, murdering 4 Israelis and wounding a dozen others in the process.

Now, here is the REAL dilemma. What should the soldiers at that terminal
crossing do tomorrow morning? Should they deny entry to the thousands of
Palestinians seeking work in Israel in order to provide for their
families? Based on their experience of the previous day, should they
deny entry to Israel to any person claiming that s/he needs medical
attention? These people, with their crutches, wheelchairs, pacemakers,
etc., are the ones most likely to trigger the alarm on the metal
detector.

Or – should they put this incident behind them, and carry on risking
their lives just because the rest of the world (which isn’t present at
this checkpoint) condemns them for not treating these people in a more
humane way.

We would really like to hear your opinion on this matter. And please
spare us the platitude that we shouldn’t be there in the first place. If
we weren’t there, the suicide bombers would have absolutely free
passage.

http://www.conceptwizard.com/info.html


Its a tough one all right :-(
Isaac.
.

User: "Attila"

Title: Re: Here is a scenario that is not at all hypothetical 29 Jan 2006 10:04:02 AM
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:29:04 -0800, Mimi Cohen <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net>
in alt.abortion with message-id <43DC4490.123999D9@cox.net> wrote:
More off topic religious propagandizing.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: To Maria, Chris, Papa Jake, and all the others who seek justice
Americans aren't so lazy after all
Subject: Re: Remember the value of life... all life
Re: Remember the value of life... all life: SUBMISSION TO JABRIOL
Re: Abortion has NO Effect on Children... ALL of which have been BORN...
vanexxas fetish room all request free phone chat pics video clips much more http://vanexxa.myifriends.net
613th GI Killed By Bush's Big Lie. Where Are All You ***** AWOL Chickenhawk Neocaon Cowards Now?
Re: yes yes yes Australia is all haters to we know criag we know
We Are All Torturers Now
Another "Loose Cannon". All info. provided
Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?Good_morning_or_good_evening_depending_upon_your_location._I_want_to_ask_you_the_most_important_question_of_your_life._Your_joy_or_sorrow_for_all_eternity_depends_upon_your_answer._The_question_is:_Are_you_saved=3F_It_is_not_a_ques
US Army: 1 Battalian Lost Every Month In Iraq Due to Casualties (Where are All You NeoCon Cowards Now?)
Kicking Yang's ***** Snorting Fairy ***** ==> Robert Reich, 4'6" and All Communist!
Bush Administration Unwilling to Release All Documents Written by Roberts
1935th GI Killed by AWOL WMD Lie, Where Are All You Fucking NeoCon Chickenhawk Traitors Now? (GOP, The Party of Treason)
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER