| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"biniohas" |
| Date: |
06 Sep 2005 08:03:47 PM |
| Object: |
Homosexuals have no souls. |
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
.
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
12 Sep 2005 06:26:44 PM |
|
|
Frank DeJesus wrote:
"Natalie Clifford Barney" <> She meant that she felt that as an out Lesbian
I am in danger if i stay in the US
What kind of an idiot quotes herself? Of all the dykes and fairies that you
admire, you can't find a single one that said anything more intelligent than
what you have said?
You are the one with the reading comprehension problem. Read the
thread again. The "she" that Natalie was referring to was her associate
at McGill University in Canada. Natalie was not quoting herself, she
was answering a question someone else asked about what Natalie's
associate was referring to by her fear for Natalie's well-being, and
her invitation to teach in Canada.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank DeJesus" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
12 Sep 2005 09:12:31 PM |
|
|
Mark Sebree" <> You are the one with the reading comprehension problem.>>
Read her signature line idiot. She posts different quotes of her own wisdom
in every post. Next time pull the ***** out of your mouth so that you can see
the screen clearly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 11:44:06 AM |
|
|
"Frank DeJesus" <frankdejesus@juno.com> wrote in message
news:2AqVe.3382$XZ1.1213@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Mark Sebree" <> You are the one with the reading comprehension problem.>>
Read her signature line idiot. She posts different quotes of her own wisdom
in every post. Next time pull the ***** out of your mouth so that you can
see
the screen clearly.
Only after you pull you OWN ***** out of your own eyes!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 03:19:24 AM |
|
|
Frank DeJesus wrote:
Mark Sebree" <> You are the one with the reading comprehension problem.>>
Read her signature line idiot. She posts different quotes of her own wisdom
in every post. Next time pull the ***** out of your mouth so that you can see
the screen clearly.
Actually, I prefer *****. I have never tried *****, and I have never
had any desire to. You also seem to have a problem with making
erroneous assumptions about people's sexuality and orientation.
And I thought that you were talking about something else that she said,
not what was in her sig. I saw her sig about her as an affirmation, a
statement that she was a lesbian, she was proud of that fact, and that
she would not kowtow to the extreme religious right, the bigots, nor
would she live in fear and deny such a basic component about herself.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomIntern" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 12:01:03 AM |
|
|
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to Frank DeJesus:
Mark Sebree" <> You are the one with the reading comprehension problem.>>
Read her signature line idiot. She posts different quotes of her own
wisdom in every post. Next time pull the ***** out of your mouth so that
you can see the screen clearly.
Natalie Clifford Barney was a noted turn-of-the-19th-Century lesbian writer,
famous for her French salon. The poster to whom you refer isn't using her
legal name, as I am not using mine, Daedalus isn't using hers, Attila isn't
using his, and many others in this thread are not using theirs. Using one's
legal name in a public forum is a risk, a potentially deadly one.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Zeligg" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 12:36:37 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:12:31 -0400, "Frank DeJesus"
<frankdejesus@juno.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree" <> You are the one with the reading comprehension problem.>>
Read her signature line idiot. She posts different quotes of her own wisdom
in every post. Next time pull the ***** out of your mouth so that you can see
the screen clearly.
Why don't you post unconfusingly, then. This is what you posted:
------------------------------------------
"Natalie Clifford Barney" <> She meant that she felt that as an out
Lesbian
I am in danger if i stay in the US
What kind of an idiot quotes herself? Of all the dykes and fairies
that you
admire, you can't find a single one that said anything more
intelligent than
what you have said?
--------------------------
To any intelligent person it would look like you are talking about the
section Natalie quoted that you posted, not the signature that you
didn't post.
Zeligg
"Prayer has no place in the public schools,
just like facts have no place in organized religion."
- Superintendent Chalmers, The Simpsons
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 11:43:02 AM |
|
|
"Natalie Clifford Barney" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:43260302.55FAF9F8@20RueJacob.fr...
Jude wrote:
"Natalie Clifford Barney" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:43259B3D.D8DECDFF@20RueJacob.fr...
The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to JohnN:
biniohas wrote:
They have no souls, which make them on the same level as insects
or
plants.
If there is no soul then there can be no sin. The Mosaic laws of
the
OT do not apply and there is no abomination.
One could even argue that a homosexual could be hunted down for
food,
Remember Elmer Fudd, homosexuals can hunt back.
also such an action would surely subject the population to a
host of deadly diseases.
In the OT and the NT, God visited diseases on human kind as
punishment
for sins. As homosexuals have no souls, they can have no sin, thus
no
diseases. You are better advised to be weary of your fellow
'Christians' as they are sinners, armed and dangerous.
Goddess knows we're all weary of them...;-{)}
A colleague at McGill University approached me today by phone,
requesting
that
I consider leaving the US for Montreal "while there is still time
Natalie...."
to teach there. Would have to relearn francais, but that would not be
terrible.
Tempting offer, but i had a shudder as I realized that she saw me in
the
same
light that friends saw jewish women in germany after 1932.
"....while there is still time....."
Natalie, I'm not getting what you're saying. What was she meaning?
Are our neighbors seeing something that we are missing?
She meant that she felt that as an out Lesbian I am in danger if i stay in
the
US
How nice some people are, huh? They go out of their way to warn you of
dangerous things and situations.... lol
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roneal" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
12 Sep 2005 11:32:00 AM |
|
|
The first step in the process of mankind doing monumental evil to another
group of people, is to de-humanize them.
"They are animals. They are not human. They have no souls." and so forth.
It makes it so much easier to turn your back, ignore the suffering and sleep
comfortably at night.
This post contributes to that end. It worked well for the inhumane things
done to Jews in Europe. It worked well in justifying slavery here in the
US. It should work similarly well in doing bad things to homosexuals.
Keep up the Hate Messages. People like you are reminders to the rest of us
that Evil can cloak itself in "logic and reason".
You are a true Beanbag.
RO
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126535472.197427.269800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
They have no souls, which make them on the same level as insects or
plants.
If there is no soul then there can be no sin. The Mosaic laws of the
OT do not apply and there is no abomination.
One could even argue that a homosexual could be hunted down for
food,
Remember Elmer Fudd, homosexuals can hunt back.
also such an action would surely subject the population to a
host of deadly diseases.
In the OT and the NT, God visited diseases on human kind as punishment
for sins. As homosexuals have no souls, they can have no sin, thus no
diseases. You are better advised to be weary of your fellow
'Christians' as they are sinners, armed and dangerous.
JohnN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daedalus" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
12 Sep 2005 02:41:59 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:32:00 -0500, "Roneal" <roneal@wt.net>, wrote:
The first step in the process of mankind doing monumental evil to another
group of people, is to de-humanize them.
"They are animals. They are not human. They have no souls." and so forth.
It makes it so much easier to turn your back, ignore the suffering and sleep
comfortably at night.
This post contributes to that end. It worked well for the inhumane things
done to Jews in Europe. It worked well in justifying slavery here in the
US. It should work similarly well in doing bad things to homosexuals.
Keep up the Hate Messages. People like you are reminders to the rest of us
that Evil can cloak itself in "logic and reason".
You are a true Beanbag.
RO
Not that I don't completely agree with your post, but I found the
choice of calling him a "beanbag" quite curious and amusing.
There were other types of bags that came to my mind, douche,
*****...but not bean.
Jade
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1126535472.197427.269800@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
They have no souls, which make them on the same level as insects or
plants.
If there is no soul then there can be no sin. The Mosaic laws of the
OT do not apply and there is no abomination.
One could even argue that a homosexual could be hunted down for
food,
Remember Elmer Fudd, homosexuals can hunt back.
also such an action would surely subject the population to a
host of deadly diseases.
In the OT and the NT, God visited diseases on human kind as punishment
for sins. As homosexuals have no souls, they can have no sin, thus no
diseases. You are better advised to be weary of your fellow
'Christians' as they are sinners, armed and dangerous.
JohnN
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 01:01:23 PM |
|
|
biniohas wrote:
They have no souls, which make them on the same level as insects or
plants.
Since they have as much of a soul as you do, that must mean that you
are also on the same level as insects and plants.
One could even argue that a homosexual could be hunted down for
food,
So now you want to practice actual cannibalism as well as symbolic
cannibalism.
also such an action would surely subject the population to a
host of deadly diseases.
Well, we can start the hunt by hunting you, and see if you like it.
The fact that you seem to miss is that they are people, human beings,
and American citizens. They are supposed to have the same rights as
you do, as well as the same liberties and the same protections. If you
want to take any of them away from homosexuals, then we should start
with taking those liberties and protections away from you first. That
way, you suffer the same way they do and for the same reasons.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie Clifford Barney" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 06:46:03 PM |
|
|
biniohas wrote:
They have no souls, which make them on the same level as insects or
plants. One could even argue that a homosexual could be hunted down for
food, also such an action would surely subject the population to a
host of deadly diseases.
Very creative for people with no souls,
--
Natalie Clifford Barney
Le membre de L' Academie des Femmes
One of the Lesbian Immortals of the Left Bank
We never die....
"I am a lesbian. One needn't hide it."
Natalie Clifford Barney
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 06:14:47 AM |
|
|
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 06:28:39 AM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 06:38:44 AM |
|
|
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 12:08:55 PM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126093124.773037.113670@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the conservatives
on a daily basis here.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 12:24:55 PM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126093124.773037.113670@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Door... hit... *****...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 10:53:01 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly. At least social
liberals support freedom, equality, and liberty, concepts that seem to
be foreign to the mindset of the ERR.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 11:20:41 AM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 12:56:54 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time. The statement above
that homosexuals have no souls, people calling for their execution,
supporting discrimination against them are all examples of this hatred
and intolerance. Plus their desire to force their intolerance and
"morals" on everyone else, whether or not everyone else believes as
they do shows both their desire to control others to the others'
detriment, as well as their intolerance toward anything that they do
not believe in or consider "proper", whether or not that item is any of
their business.
Your own history shows that I am not a liar, and there is no reason to
rescind my observation or statement since there is overwhelming
evidence in support if it.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 01:09:03 PM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 02:10:37 PM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126116543.172463.133280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than
Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death,
surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All
human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they
have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase
religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on
a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes he does.
Before you even respond, IKYABWAI.
[plonk]
.
|
|
|
| User: "MFOgilvie" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 11:57:24 AM |
|
|
Dennis Kemmerer wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126116543.172463.133280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than
Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death,
surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All
human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they
have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase
religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on
a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes he does.
No he doesn't, and neither do you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
07 Sep 2005 02:37:01 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do. I even gave examples, which you snipped. I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
If you cannot stand the truth about the people you admire, then you
should not be in alt.abortion. This place is a rather no-holds-barred
debating forum.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "MFOgilvie" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 11:59:51 AM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
If you cannot stand the truth about the people you admire, then you
should not be in alt.abortion. This place is a rather no-holds-barred
debating forum.
IF...and that is a big if...yu tell the truth, I'll comment on it.
Until then, hush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 12:59:51 PM |
|
|
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I did not lie. The truth should be read, and I have told the truth.
You, apparently, cannot handle the truth that throws light on the
darkness of your intolerance and misconceptions.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
Look again. I was describing people like you. The hatred and venom of
the Extreme Religious Reich (ERR) is meant to harm others, and to deny
them their personal and civil rights. If there is any venom in the
speech of "Clinton Liberals", it is to defend those rights.
Basically, "Clinton Liberals" are a better breed of human being than
you and ERR are. They defend rights and freedom and liberty, while you
see to tear them down and take them away.
I would much rather be a "Clinton liberal" than a "Bush conservative",
since I believe in upholding and expanding people's rights and
liberties rather than tearing them down.
If you cannot stand the truth about the people you admire, then you
should not be in alt.abortion. This place is a rather no-holds-barred
debating forum.
IF...and that is a big if...yu tell the truth,
Which I do constantly. And there is no "if" about it.
I'll comment on it.
Last time I did, you ran away from the truth, and called it a lie. And
there in, you have shown that you do not respect the truth.
Until then, hush.
No. This is a public forum, and you have no authority over me
whatsoever. I will continue to write the truth and the facts, even if
you do not like it. You can ignore the facts and the truth, but you
cannot silence me, nor can you make the truth go away just because you
disagree with it.
By the way, you have provided another small example of the controlling
attitutde and intolerance that I was speaking of earlier that the ERR
is so well known for.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "MFOgilvie" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
13 Sep 2005 01:10:01 PM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I did not lie.
Yes you did.
The truth should be read, and I have told the truth.
You, apparently, cannot handle the truth that throws light on the
darkness of your intolerance and misconceptions.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
Look again. I was describing people like you.
No you didn't. You described every liberal walking the face of
America. Liberals are the ones who constantly practice intolerance ahd
hatred towards those simply opinions may differ.
The hatred and venom of
the Extreme Religious Reich (ERR) is meant to harm others, and to deny
them their personal and civil rights.
Religious conservatives practice absolutely no hatred, and you have no
proof of such. End of discussion.
If there is any venom in the
speech of "Clinton Liberals", it is to defend those rights.
Oh please. Tell that to 87 dead people in Waco, whose only "crime" was
that they chose to live separated from Clinton's socialist utopia
police state.
Basically, "Clinton Liberals" are a better breed of human being than
you and ERR are.
Liberals are not even human beings. they contribute absolutely nothing
beneficial to society, with the possible exception of serving as object
lessons of societal rejects.
They defend rights and freedom and liberty, while you
see to tear them down and take them away.
That's why you applauded the stealing of land away from the people in
New England, right?
I would much rather be a "Clinton liberal" than a "Bush conservative",
So you would rather be a non-human. thank you for clarifyuing where
you rank as compared to me...one step to the left, 20 steps to the
rear.
since I believe in upholding and expanding people's rights and
liberties rather than tearing them down.
If you cannot stand the truth about the people you admire, then you
should not be in alt.abortion. This place is a rather no-holds-barred
debating forum.
IF...and that is a big if...yu tell the truth,
Which I do constantly. And there is no "if" about it.
Not if you are a liberal. Liberals never tell the truth abot anything
political.
I'll comment on it.
Last time I did, you ran away from the truth, and called it a lie.
I called it what it is, and you couldn't handle it.
And
there in, you have shown that you do not respect the truth.
Until then, hush.
No. This is a public forum, and you have no authority over me
whatsoever. I will continue to write the truth and the facts, even if
you do not like it.
I'm waiting on you to get started.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
14 Sep 2005 01:13:18 AM |
|
|
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I did not lie.
Yes you did.
You would have a great deal proving that, since I have been telling the
truth. You just do not like the truth, apparently.
The truth should be read, and I have told the truth.
You, apparently, cannot handle the truth that throws light on the
darkness of your intolerance and misconceptions.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
Look again. I was describing people like you.
No you didn't.
Yes, I have. And you continue to prove that I have been.
You described every liberal walking the face of
America.
No, I was describing the extreme right conservatives.
Liberals are the ones who constantly practice intolerance ahd
hatred towards those simply opinions may differ.
You are the ones that constantly seek to force others to live by your
rules. You seek to shove your sick "morality" down our throats. You
are the ones that wish to deny rights to large groups of people that
you do not like, such as homosexuals, pagan, non-Christians, and
liberals. You are the ones that seek to remake America into a
tyrannical theocracy.
Liberals tend to defend the rights of others that you seek to deny
rights to. If there is any intolerance in liberals, it is towards
inequality and tyranny such as you espouse.
The hatred and venom of
the Extreme Religious Reich (ERR) is meant to harm others, and to deny
them their personal and civil rights.
Religious conservatives practice absolutely no hatred, and you have no
proof of such. End of discussion.
You are blind, then. They have a long history of hatred. Witch hunts,
the Crusades, the Inquisition, seeking to deny homosexuals the right to
marry, opposing inter-racial marriages, opposing solid science and
teaching it in school, oppression of pagans, etc. The list goes on.
And as far as some of your pundits, take a look at people like Jerry
Falwell, Pat Robertson, Tim and Bev LeHaye, Fred Phelps, all those nice
terrorists that are bombing medical clinics, Donald Spitz, and so many
other people. YOU!
I have plenty of proof. You just will not accept it, since it
disagrees with your delusions.
If there is any venom in the
speech of "Clinton Liberals", it is to defend those rights.
Oh please. Tell that to 87 dead people in Waco, whose only "crime" was
that they chose to live separated from Clinton's socialist utopia
police state.
Bush is the one that promotes a police state. We have lost many
freedoms under him, and they may be hard to get back.
Basically, "Clinton Liberals" are a better breed of human being than
you and ERR are.
Liberals are not even human beings.
That is another example of your hatred and intolerance.
they contribute absolutely nothing
beneficial to society, with the possible exception of serving as object
lessons of societal rejects.
Again, you know nothing about history. They are one of the main
driving mechanisms for creating a beneficial society. Examples include
the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the end of slavery, allowing
women to vote, changing the voting age to 18, the Civil Rights Act, the
Voting Rights Act, ending segregation, promotion of sciences, the
Protestant Reformation, women's rights, gay rights, the rights to use
contraceptive, the right to an abortion, Equal Employment Opportunity
Act, minimum wage laws, environmental protection laws, and on and on
and on. Conservatives have a tendency to oppose these advances in out
society.
They defend rights and freedom and liberty, while you
see to tear them down and take them away.
That's why you applauded the stealing of land away from the people in
New England, right?
Wrong. I did not agree with that decision. Luckily, most states have
checks in place to limit the use of eminent domain.
I would much rather be a "Clinton liberal" than a "Bush conservative",
So you would rather be a non-human.
I am very human. I am also more compassionate and a better quality of
human being than you are. That is why I am a liberal.
Your calling me a "non-human" is just another example of your hatred
and intolerance.
thank you for clarifyuing where
you rank as compared to me...one step to the left, 20 steps to the
rear.
And you are the one walking backwards. You need to turn around, and
see that I am actually in front of you, and getting farther ahead. I
favor progress, not the regression you seem to want.
since I believe in upholding and expanding people's rights and
liberties rather than tearing them down.
If you cannot stand the truth about the people you admire, then you
should not be in alt.abortion. This place is a rather no-holds-barred
debating forum.
IF...and that is a big if...yu tell the truth,
Which I do constantly. And there is no "if" about it.
Not if you are a liberal. Liberals never tell the truth abot anything
political.
They are telling more of the truth than conservatives are.
I'll comment on it.
Last time I did, you ran away from the truth, and called it a lie.
I called it what it is, and you couldn't handle it.
You have yet to tell the truth about anything. All you have done is
call me names, and I have consistently slapped you down. And that is
because I have actual facts and history on my side, whereas you only
have childish name-calling.
And
there in, you have shown that you do not respect the truth.
Until then, hush.
No. This is a public forum, and you have no authority over me
whatsoever. I will continue to write the truth and the facts, even if
you do not like it.
I'm waiting on you to get started.
I have been telling you the truth all along. You just cannot handle
it. That is why you have to resort to lies, name-calling, and running
away.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
14 Sep 2005 07:17:09 AM |
|
|
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I did not lie.
Yes you did.
You would have a great deal proving that, since I have been telling the
truth. You just do not like the truth, apparently.
The truth should be read, and I have told the truth.
You, apparently, cannot handle the truth that throws light on the
darkness of your intolerance and misconceptions.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
Look again. I was describing people like you.
No you didn't.
Yes, I have. And you continue to prove that I have been.
You described every liberal walking the face of
America.
No, I was describing the extreme right conservatives.
Hardly. Conservatives are not the ones who go into a pure blue rage
when a student wears a cross to high school, and want the school
administration to expel her on the grounds of the made up "separation
of church and state" lie.
Conservatives are not the ones who threaten elected and appointed
cabinet officials over the radio airwaves. Remember Randi Rhodes and
Al Franken?
Conservatives are not the ones who want Christianity made illegal in
America. we are not the ones who have apoplectic strokes whenever a
city council wants to put up a nativity scene at Christmas, or threaten
school teachers with their jobs or jail if they hang a "Merry
Christmas" banner in their classrooms.
Conservatives are not the ones who continuously embrace and make
excuses for immoral behavior. Like it or not, the moral principles as
taught in the Holy Bible played a large part in the overall structure
of American society. Indeed, those principles make up the fabric that
has held this country together all these years. We expect a certain
level of behavior form our fellow citizens, and as far as we are
concerned, those expectations are not unreasonable. Moreover, to
expect certain moral behaviors is not even remotely "sick", as you so
putridly spewed. Nor do they violate anyone's so-called "rights." God
set forth these expectations Himself. I'm not about to quesiton His
wisdom, and I resent anyone who does.
And please, spare me the "liberals defend people's rights" spew. The
only so-called "rights" that liberals concern themselves with are the
right to abortion, and the right to be "homosexual in public." And
don't even try to pretend you do not know of what I speak. Basically,
these two so-called "rights" form the foundation for the leftist
"I-can-behave-as-selfishly-and-hedonistically-as-I-want-and-you-can't-tell-me
what-to-do" freedom from personal responsibility mindset. This
mindset, as you have been so aptly demonstrating, stems from an
unlimited and unjustified hatred of Christianity and everything it
represents. Christianity flies right in the face of what you believe,
so rather than live and let live, Christianity must be destroyed.
Otherwise, how are you going to advance your perverted anti-American
leftist agenda?
Well I got news for you, junior. We aren't going anywhere. Your
agenda is wrong, and if you think you can bully us into silence with
your usual hateful namecalling, think again. Conservatives are the
ones who make this country work, and we're not about to just roll over
anymore and let you destroy what it has taken us 200 years to construct.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
15 Sep 2005 03:47:40 AM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
No, I was describing the extreme right conservatives.
Hardly. Conservatives are not the ones who go into a pure blue rage
when a student wears a cross to high school,
Conservatives are the ones who lie about others. Conservatives are
the one who turture and kill gays. Conservatives are the ones who
turtured and lynched blacks who got too friendly with white women.
Conservatives are the ones who burned alive those who dared to
criticize your religion.
Conservatives are not the ones who threaten elected and appointed
cabinet officials over the radio airwaves. Remember Randi Rhodes and
Al Franken?
You're one of those who lies about others.
Conservatives are not the ones who want Christianity made illegal in
America.
I have seen NOBODY who wants to make Christianity illegal. But you're
rather spew your hatred and your lies and your evil than accept that
other people might be more moral that murderous lunatics like you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Homosexuals have no souls. |
14 Sep 2005 07:22:42 AM |
|
|
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126700229.162211.152320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
MFOgilvie wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Mark Sebree wrote:
mattogilvie55@aol.com wrote:
Andrealphus wrote:
<mattogilvie55@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126091687.749569.138880@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
biniohas wrote:
The were descended from a seedline completely
diffrent than Adam, the
Creation of God the Almighty. They must be put to
death, surely.
Oh, shut up spewing that filth. That's a bunch of
BS. All human
beings have souls. the problem with homosexuals is
that they have
allowed their souls to be had by Satan.
Great. Two loons arguing the relative merits of
their nutcase religion.
Just what the newsgroups need more of.
Beats the pure blue heck out of the vomit spewed by the
liberals on a
daily basis here.
Which in turn is far better than the hatred and
intolerance that the
Extreme Religious Riech (ERR) spews forth constantly.
Religious conservatives don't "spew hatred", liar. Care to
try again?
No, because I seem them doing so all the time.
No you don't.
Yes, I do.
No you don't. I even gave examples, which you snipped.
Because you lied,a nd your lies do not deserve to be read.
I did not lie.
Yes you did.
You would have a great deal proving that, since I have been telling the
truth. You just do not like the truth, apparently.
The truth should be read, and I have told the truth.
You, apparently, cannot handle the truth that throws light on the
darkness of your intolerance and misconceptions.
I can even name
names of prominent ones, if you wish.
The Extreme Religious Reich/Right is well and rightly known for
the
hatred and venom that they spew towards those that they do not
like.
Now you just described the Clinton liberals.
Look again. I was describing people like you.
No you didn't.
Yes, I have. And you continue to prove that I have been.
You described every liberal walking the face of
America.
No, I was describing the extreme right conservatives.
Hardly. Conservatives are not the ones who go into a pure blue rage
when a student wears a cross to high school, and want the school
administration to expel her on the grounds of the made up "separation
of church and state" lie.
Perhaps not, but I have seen Conservatives go into a pure blind, blue rage
when a student wears a pentagram, and upside down crucifix, and numerous
other such devices. It seems they very much believe in a seperation of
church and state when it is convenient for them to do so.
Conservatives are not the ones who threaten elected and appointed
cabinet officials over the radio airwaves. Remember Randi Rhodes and
Al Franken?
Really? Apparently you've never listened to Liddy's radio show.
Conservatives are not the ones who want Christianity made illegal in
America. we are not the ones who have apoplectic strokes whenever a
city council wants to put up a nativity scene at Christmas, or threaten
school teachers with their jobs or jail if they hang a "Merry
Christmas" banner in their classrooms.
Why should this be allowed? Why should the public sector be used to promote
one religion over another?
Conservatives are not the ones who continuously embrace and make
excuses for immoral behavior.
LOL! I suggest you wake up. Entering us into a war that resulted in tens
of thousands, perhaps more, deaths based on a lie is immoral behavior.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
