| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
19 Oct 2006 10:52:22 PM |
| Object: |
Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52503
By D. James Kennedy
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
The Legislature acted on the twin findings of a task force that found
irrefutable scientific proof that abortion hurts women and life begins at
conception. In passing this bill, the Legislature sought to protect women
and save the lives of hundreds of children every year. The good citizens of
South Dakota will have the opportunity to ratify the legislation in November
by voting "yes" on Referred Law 6.
While this seems on the surface simply to be the right thing to do, those
who profit from abortion, such as Planned Parenthood, are directing their
formidable national resources against the success of the effort. Their
strategy seems to be to confuse and frighten the voters. But South Dakotans
are not easily manipulated.
One thing that the opponents of the legislation will not admit to is that
there are limited exceptions for abortion in instances of rape, incest and
to save the life of the mother. This means that abortion will no longer be
used as a method of birth control, which most people object to. Instead, it
will be used only in situations where women have been the victim of abuse or
are at risk of losing their lives. Once South Dakotans know this, they will
overwhelmingly vote yes for life.
Hollywood elites such as Jane Fonda and Robin Williams have given money to
"enlighten" the heartland about the virtues of abortion. Groups such as the
National Organization for Women are working in South Dakota to reverse the
ban. One wonders why leading feminists support an act that so harms women
and makes them more subject to exploitation by men. Where are the real
women's advocates when you need them?
In a more tragic act of misguided morality, a small group of South Dakota
ministers recently weighed in at a press conference. These ministers are
supposed to represent Christ in South Dakota, yet they argued that
protecting women from exploitation and saving the lives of babies is not a
simple matter of right and wrong. I am sure that many of their parishioners
were shocked to see their ministers echoing the Planned Parenthood position.
Thank God for the hundreds of faithful ministers in South Dakota who have
endorsed the VoteYesForLife.com campaign.
What the South Dakota Legislature did is not radical. The Legislature is
standing in our great historic Western legal tradition. It was paganism,
like that in ancient Rome, that practiced abortion on demand. This was
always rejected throughout history wherever Christian values were followed.
Christ honored women and did more to exalt women than anyone in history. We
must also seek to protect them from sexual exploitation, including abortion.
Christ valued children and tenderly blessed them. We, too, must love them
into the world, because all life is created in the image of God.
This is the hope we have from the heartland - the simple, common decency
that South Dakotans have always exhibited. There is no confusion here - only
the hope of the end of this most egregious exploitation of women and loss of
precious human life. For the sake of women and babies, I urge a "yes" vote
on Referred Law 6.
--
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
20 Oct 2006 06:38:39 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:t4SdnYtwZZPC1aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52503
By D. James Kennedy
From Wikipedia:
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has severely criticized[5] the
neo-creationist documentary produced by the Coral Ridge Ministries "Darwin's
Deadly Legacy,"[6] which attempts to link the theory of evolution to Hitler:
"This is an outrageous and shoddy attempt by D. James Kennedy to trivialize
the horrors of the Holocaust. Hitler did not need Darwin to devise his
heinous plan to exterminate the Jewish people. Trivializing the Holocaust
comes from either ignorance at best or, at worst, a mendacious attempt to
score political points in the culture war on the backs of six million Jewish
victims and others who died at the hands of the Nazis." The ADL further
denounced Kennedy as "a leader among the distinct group of 'Christian
Supremacists' who seek to 'reclaim America for Christ' and turn the U.S.
into a Christian nation guided by their strange notions of biblical law."
Coral Ridge Ministries described the ADL's criticisms in a press release[7]
as "harsh" and "unfounded" while reiterating points made in the documentary,
along with citing British evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith who the center cites
as saying in the 1940's, "The German Führer, as I have consistently
maintained, is an evolutionist. He has consciously sought to make the
practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution". Furthermore, Daniel
Lapin, a Jewish Orthodox rabbi, issued a statement [8] criticizing the ADL
for what he claims was a miscategorization of Jewish opinion, and said
"...the ADL, though filled with good intent, is utterly, compleatly
clueless.". Also, the center released a statement[9] concerning the ADL
statement's accusations that a Dr. Francis Collins was misled in the
documentary, saying that he signed a "Talent release", giving the center
rights to use his statements, and denying that Collins had "NO knowledge
that Coral Ridge Ministries was planning a TV special on Darwin and Hitler"
as the ADL put it.
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
The Legislature acted on the twin findings of a task force that found
irrefutable scientific proof that abortion hurts women and life begins at
conception. In passing this bill, the Legislature sought to protect women
and save the lives of hundreds of children every year. The good citizens
of
South Dakota will have the opportunity to ratify the legislation in
November
by voting "yes" on Referred Law 6.
While this seems on the surface simply to be the right thing to do, those
who profit from abortion, such as Planned Parenthood, are directing their
formidable national resources against the success of the effort. Their
strategy seems to be to confuse and frighten the voters. But South
Dakotans
are not easily manipulated.
One thing that the opponents of the legislation will not admit to is that
there are limited exceptions for abortion in instances of rape, incest and
to save the life of the mother. This means that abortion will no longer be
used as a method of birth control, which most people object to. Instead,
it
will be used only in situations where women have been the victim of abuse
or
are at risk of losing their lives. Once South Dakotans know this, they
will
overwhelmingly vote yes for life.
Hollywood elites such as Jane Fonda and Robin Williams have given money to
"enlighten" the heartland about the virtues of abortion. Groups such as
the
National Organization for Women are working in South Dakota to reverse the
ban. One wonders why leading feminists support an act that so harms women
and makes them more subject to exploitation by men. Where are the real
women's advocates when you need them?
In a more tragic act of misguided morality, a small group of South Dakota
ministers recently weighed in at a press conference. These ministers are
supposed to represent Christ in South Dakota, yet they argued that
protecting women from exploitation and saving the lives of babies is not a
simple matter of right and wrong. I am sure that many of their
parishioners
were shocked to see their ministers echoing the Planned Parenthood
position.
Thank God for the hundreds of faithful ministers in South Dakota who have
endorsed the VoteYesForLife.com campaign.
What the South Dakota Legislature did is not radical. The Legislature is
standing in our great historic Western legal tradition. It was paganism,
like that in ancient Rome, that practiced abortion on demand. This was
always rejected throughout history wherever Christian values were
followed.
Christ honored women and did more to exalt women than anyone in history.
We
must also seek to protect them from sexual exploitation, including
abortion.
Christ valued children and tenderly blessed them. We, too, must love them
into the world, because all life is created in the image of God.
This is the hope we have from the heartland - the simple, common decency
that South Dakotans have always exhibited. There is no confusion here -
only
the hope of the end of this most egregious exploitation of women and loss
of
precious human life. For the sake of women and babies, I urge a "yes" vote
on Referred Law 6.
--
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
20 Oct 2006 12:02:41 PM |
|
|
Born again as a loser, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:t4SdnYtwZZPC1aXYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
<Wholed Nutz tripe flushed>
By D. James Kennedy
You really do cast your lot with the loons, IBen:
"Meet the Dominionists -- biblical literalists who believe God has called
them to take over the U.S. government. As the far-right wing of the
evangelical movement, Dominionists are pressing an agenda that makes Newt
Gingrich's Contract With America look like the Communist Manifesto. They
want to rewrite schoolbooks to reflect a Christian version of American
history, pack the nation's courts with judges who follow Old Testament law,
post the Ten Commandments in every courthouse and make it a felony for gay
men to have sex and women to have abortions. In Florida, when the courts
ordered Terri Schiavo's feeding tube removed, it was the Dominionists who
organized round-the-clock protests and issued a fiery call for Gov. Jeb Bush
to defy the law and take Schiavo into state custody. Their ultimate goal is
to plant the seeds of a "faith-based" government that will endure far longer
than Bush's presidency -- all the way until Jesus comes back.
{...}
The godfather of the Dominionists is D. James Kennedy, the most influential
evangelical you've never heard of. A former Arthur Murray dance instructor,
he launched his Florida ministry in 1959, when most evangelicals still
followed Billy Graham's gospel of nonpartisan soul-saving. Kennedy built
Coral Ridge Ministries into a $37-million-a-year empire, with a TV-and-radio
audience of 3 million, by preaching that it was time to save America -- not
soul by soul but election by election."
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7235393/the_crusaders/
LC~ Hypocritroll "J": pedophile for Gawd.
"are you the same harry that takes it in the arse? or are you the harry that
just loves to suck horse's *****?"
From: "J 'quack-quack' Young", stalking nutcase and beastiality fetishest.
Message-ID:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
20 Oct 2006 12:57:01 AM |
|
|
J Young a =E9crit :
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=3D52503
By D. James Kennedy
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
No matter how many times you write it, there are no nore "unborn human
life" than "undead human beings".
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
Funny, how about asking women what they prefer: abortion on demand or
prohibition of this right? Talk about "treating women"... BTW, what do
you know about women, J Young?
..=2E.
Hollywood elites such as Jane Fonda and Robin Williams have given money to
"enlighten" the heartland about the virtues of abortion.
Abortion is not a question of virtue. It's a private matter and NO
FUCKING ONE has the right to decide for someone else.
Groups such as the
National Organization for Women are working in South Dakota to reverse the
ban. One wonders why leading feminists support an act that so harms women
and makes them more subject to exploitation by men.
Idiot.
Where are the real
women's advocates when you need them?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Good Reverend Roger" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
19 Oct 2006 11:00:30 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
Why does South Dakota hate article VI of the US Constitution?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
20 Oct 2006 10:00:47 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:00:30 -0700, The Good Reverend Roger wrote:
J Young wrote:
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
Why does South Dakota hate article VI of the US Constitution?
Just Article VI?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
22 Oct 2006 01:24:16 AM |
|
|
In article <jbadnaCZGOICeaXYnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:00:30 -0700, The Good Reverend Roger wrote:
J Young wrote:
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
By the passage of this bill, artfully crafted by a bipartisan majority of
the South Dakota Legislature and signed by Gov. Mike Rounds, we have the
hope of beginning to reverse a tragic epoch in the way we treat women and
babies.
Why does South Dakota hate article VI of the US Constitution?
Just Article VI?
And I suppose that they also think that the Bill of Rights is optional.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Kutchie" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
19 Oct 2006 11:48:57 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52503
By D. James Kennedy
The historic South Dakota law that ends abortion on demand is described in
its opening paragraph as "An Act to . reinstate the prohibition against
certain acts causing the termination of an unborn human life. ."
Well, since the most commonly used one is conception, maybe they should
sterilise everyone.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PerfectlyAble" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
19 Oct 2006 11:31:06 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52503
One thing that the opponents of the legislation will not admit to is that
there are limited exceptions for abortion in instances of rape, incest and
to save the life of the mother. This means that abortion will no longer be
used as a method of birth control, which most people object to. Instead, it
will be used only in situations where women have been the victim of abuse or
are at risk of losing their lives. Once South Dakotans know this, they will
overwhelmingly vote yes for life.
Women will be force to take retarded children to term.
Women will be denied grandkids as their handicapped
children will never marry and have kids.
State enforced eugenics.
Women who cannot prove rape, will accuse the men as a rapist.
Women who cannot prove rape and aren't allowed to have
an abortion will have to worry that the rapist genes will
become transmit to their family line, that one day a child
of rape will turnup on their door looking for their mother.
Or worse they keep the child, not adopt, and spend their
lives staying at the face of their rapist.
Adopt and be ostracised by their family, and fear every day
a knock on the door; or murder their child or go insane wanting to.
Oh, joy, the loony heartless religious nutters are at it again.
If they pass a law it will fix everything, back allay abortions
won't reappear.
Man are fundies nuts!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
21 Oct 2006 08:11:00 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:52:22 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
The Legislature acted on the twin findings of a task force that found
irrefutable scientific proof that abortion hurts women
Of course it hurts SOME women. So does giving birth. The task force
wasn't scientific, it manipulated scientific findings to prove its
foregone conclusion - a religious tactic. (The phrase "scientific
proof", alone, is proof of that.)
and life begins at conception.
The question isn't whether the conceptus is alive (broccoli is alive),
but whether it's a human being, and science hasn't even addressed the
issue, let alone reached a conclusion.
One thing that the opponents of the legislation will not admit to is that
there are limited exceptions for abortion in instances of rape, incest and
to save the life of the mother.
Assuming that the on-the-ground implementation of the law doesn't make
the proof so onerous that, for all practical purposes, the exceptions
don't exist.
Once South Dakotans know this, they will overwhelmingly vote yes for life.
Which would only serve to prove what fools they are.
Where are the real women's advocates when you need them?
Fighting the enemies of women - the ones trying to get the law passed.
Thank God for the hundreds of faithful ministers in South Dakota who have
endorsed the VoteYesForLife.com campaign.
What more evidence do we need that this is a religious, not a
scientific, matter?
What the South Dakota Legislature did is not radical. The Legislature is
standing in our great historic Western legal tradition. It was paganism,
like that in ancient Rome
In ancient Rome, Christians were considered atheists.
that practiced abortion on demand.
The entire human species practiced "abortion on demand" for tens of
thousands of years - until Western doctors realized how much money
they were losing by letting non-doctors perform abortions.
Christianity was silent on the subject for nearly 2,000 years. The
Old Testament, in fact, specifically stays away from the subject.
This was always rejected throughout history wherever Christian values were followed.
Not in Christian Constantinople. Not in Christian Rome. Not in
Christian Europe. Not until the 19th century.
Christ honored women and did more to exalt women than anyone in history.
Christ? Paul. And he told men to stay away from women or, if they
couldn't, to get married. Some exaltation.
Christ valued children and tenderly blessed them.
Unless they disobeyed their parents. Or showed them lack of respect.
We, too, must love them
into the world, because all life is created in the image of God.
Then stop eating and start sucking your nourishment from the ground,
like the plant you are. Or learn the difference between "life" and
"human being".
Don't these morons realize that the choice isn't between abortion and
no abortion, but between a clean safe abortion and a dangerous butcher
job in a back alley? Women have been terminating pregnancies since
before history began - and they're not going to stop just because some
misogynistic theists say they should.
If men could get pregnant, abortion wouldn't only be legal, it would
be a sacrament.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever.... This is a somewhat new kind of religion."
- Letter to Hans Muehsam March 30, 1954; Einstein Archive 38-434
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Malcolm" |
|
| Title: Re: Hope from the heartland for women and babies |
22 Oct 2006 04:58:30 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
If men could get pregnant, abortion wouldn't only be legal, it would
be a sacrament.
Abortion is the feminist sacrament.
Only a woman can make this deeply personal, highly serious decision about
the course of her pregnancy.
Abortion is seen as dignifying the woman.
--
www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
freeware games to download.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
