| Topic: |
Science > Abortion |
| User: |
"Kurt Greske" |
| Date: |
08 Jun 2005 08:01:48 PM |
| Object: |
If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
.
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
09 Jun 2005 12:19:54 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn? If you don't want to
father and support kids get a vasectomy.
LP.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
09 Jun 2005 08:02:54 PM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
If you don't want to
father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lovin Spoonful invalid@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
09 Jun 2005 09:20:20 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
If you don't want to
father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 07:10:33 AM |
|
|
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a8f8e7$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
So why aren't we lobbying for that?
We may as well spay every man who causes an abortion.
Since the big argument is unwanted babies, we should spay the males who are
creating the unwanted babies.
If you don't want to
father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
Sure looks sexist to me.
And, it looks unnecessary for men who are careful.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 12:48:29 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a8f8e7$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
So why aren't we lobbying for that? We may as well spay every man who causes
an abortion. Since the big argument is unwanted babies, we should spay the
males who are creating the unwanted babies.
Keep on convincing the audience that you are indeed as insane as you act in
this newsgroup. You can foot the bill for the costs your psychotic wet dream
would run up. The rest of us aren't obliged to take you for anything but the
whackjob you are.
If you don't want to father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
Sure looks sexist to me. And, it looks unnecessary for men who are careful.
You're the brain-dead cracker who's whining that abortion is sexist, because
YOU can't get pregnant...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 09:04:05 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhdg5h2aa.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a8f8e7$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist
pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
So why aren't we lobbying for that? We may as well spay every man who
causes
an abortion. Since the big argument is unwanted babies, we should spay
the
males who are creating the unwanted babies.
Keep on convincing the audience that you are indeed as insane as you act
in
this newsgroup.
You're showing your mysoginistic side there.
You can foot the bill for the costs your psychotic wet dream
would run up.
I won't.
You ***** up in my kingdom, you pay.
I pay nothing for your fuckups.
The rest of us aren't obliged to take you for anything but the
whackjob you are.
You're the nutcase, looney bin, freak show.
You want to be obliged?
LOL!!!!!!!
If you don't want to father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
Sure looks sexist to me. And, it looks unnecessary for men who are
careful.
You're the brain-dead cracker who's whining that abortion is sexist,
because
YOU can't get pregnant...
You think I wish I could get pregnant?
You *are* off your rocker.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 11:11:12 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhdg5h2aa.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a8f8e7$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist
pecker in their pants or get vasectomies.
So why aren't we lobbying for that? We may as well spay every man who
causes an abortion. Since the big argument is unwanted babies, we should
spay the males who are creating the unwanted babies.
Keep on convincing the audience that you are indeed as insane as you act in
this newsgroup.
You're showing your mysoginistic side there.
You're supporting my opinion of you - how the hell is it that you're almost 44
years old and you can't even get the basic facts right? You don't spay men.
That term is reserved for female animals - you know, pets? Your caretakers
need to get you back to the Home, and soon.
You can foot the bill for the costs your psychotic wet dream would run up.
I won't.
Of course not. It's never your responsibility.
You ***** up in my kingdom, you pay.
Your kingdom has a population of one. The rest of us aren't obliged to obey
you, period.
I pay nothing for your fuckups.
Likewise, I'm paying nothing for your continuing abuse of your fellow
taxpayers.
The rest of us aren't obliged to take you for anything but the whackjob
you are.
You're the nutcase, looney bin, freak show. You want to be obliged?
LOL!!!!!!!
At least I won't have to worry about you ever showing up anywhere I am - in
which instance, you *would* be obliged, and not in a way you'd like.
If you don't want to father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
Sure looks sexist to me. And, it looks unnecessary for men who are
careful.
You're the brain-dead cracker who's whining that abortion is sexist,
because YOU can't get pregnant...
You think I wish I could get pregnant? You *are* off your rocker.
You've made no secret of your opinion that abortion is sexist - since only
women can get one. That's for a reason obvious to everyone saner than you,
but that hasn't stopped you from whining about it anyway. Maybe you should go
back to the AOP MHC - willingly, this time.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 12:02:17 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkis0j4ktb.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkhdg5h2aa.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a8f8e7$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want
the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist
pecker in their pants or get vasectomies.
So why aren't we lobbying for that? We may as well spay every man who
causes an abortion. Since the big argument is unwanted babies, we
should
spay the males who are creating the unwanted babies.
Keep on convincing the audience that you are indeed as insane as you act
in
this newsgroup.
You're showing your mysoginistic side there.
You're supporting my opinion of you - how the hell is it that you're
almost 44
years old and you can't even get the basic facts right? You don't spay
men.
That term is reserved for female animals - you know, pets? Your
caretakers
need to get you back to the Home, and soon.
You can foot the bill for the costs your psychotic wet dream would run
up.
I won't.
Of course not. It's never your responsibility.
You ***** up in my kingdom, you pay.
Your kingdom has a population of one. The rest of us aren't obliged to
obey
you, period.
I pay nothing for your fuckups.
Likewise, I'm paying nothing for your continuing abuse of your fellow
taxpayers.
The rest of us aren't obliged to take you for anything but the whackjob
you are.
You're the nutcase, looney bin, freak show. You want to be obliged?
LOL!!!!!!!
At least I won't have to worry about you ever showing up anywhere I am -
in
which instance, you *would* be obliged, and not in a way you'd like.
If you don't want to father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
Sure looks sexist to me. And, it looks unnecessary for men who are
careful.
You're the brain-dead cracker who's whining that abortion is sexist,
because YOU can't get pregnant...
You think I wish I could get pregnant? You *are* off your rocker.
You've made no secret of your opinion that abortion is sexist
Current abortion policy *is* sexist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 12:23:41 PM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkis0j4ktb.fsf@eris.io.com...
[...]
You've made no secret of your opinion that abortion is sexist
Current abortion policy *is* sexist.
....in the opinion of one certified lunatic named John Wentzky. That's the
detail you keep overlooking. No one else is obliged to cater to your fantasy.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Greske" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 05:35:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:20:20 -0500, "Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid>
wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
For myself, if any woman ever has my child and aborts it, I feel it
is my duty to make her pay, life for life. My feelings are so strong
on this that before I got married all my GF's knew this.
If you don't want to
father and support kids get a vasectomy.
Sexist?
Sexist?
LS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 09:24:30 PM |
|
|
Kurt Greske <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote:
For myself, if any woman ever has my child and aborts it, I feel it
is my duty to make her pay, life for life.
So you're a murderous control freak.
My feelings are so strong
on this that before I got married all my GF's knew this.
"If you get an abortion I'll kill you"
Classic abuser mentality.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 12:51:46 AM |
|
|
Kurt Greske <kurt_greske@eee.org> writes:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:20:20 -0500, "Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid>
wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Fx5qe.75813$CR5.6864@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn
that are carried to term by a sexist woman's right to choose?
And sexist men have the sexist right to choose to keep their sexist pecker
in their pants or get vasectomies.
For myself, if any woman ever has my child and aborts it, I feel it is my
duty to make her pay, life for life. My feelings are so strong on this that
before I got married all my GF's knew this.
Don't worry about it - no sane woman would let you lay so much as a hand on
her, once she's informed about your defects. (It'd be a shame if you picked
one who didn't mind defending herself, even if she didn't bother letting us
know where your pauper's grave would be located.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 04:22:50 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 07:11:25 AM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 12:49:27 AM |
|
|
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
....in sales tax, on money that you didn't earn. So?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 09:11:45 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkd5qth28o.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
...in sales tax, on money that you didn't earn. So?
There are plenty of taxes to pay.
The money I receive is earmarked for me via a formula.
It can not be changed.
The amount is predetermined.
Had I not earned enough in wages my benefit amount would be less, but there
would still be some minimum stipend even had I not contributed anything.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 02:23:27 AM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 00:49:27 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
...in sales tax, on money that you didn't earn.
....eith money he hasn't earned. If he had received something from
Duke, why the decade-long temper tantrum? Otherwise, he retired, very
early.
So?
Precisely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 09:14:45 AM |
|
|
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:284la1l63v81smgh17c887dl2qc9tbqleo@4ax.com...
On 11 Jun 2005 00:49:27 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
...in sales tax, on money that you didn't earn.
...eith money he hasn't earned.
What a lie.
If he had received something from
Duke, why the decade-long temper tantrum?
You actually care?
Otherwise, he retired, very
early.
I was terminated in 1993.
You want me to quote what the other Duke employee said, verbatim?
"You can't have it, you're fired."
Now, that is about the worst thing anyone has said to me in my entire life.
So?
Precisely.
I sure hope you can be smarter than to rashly resort to misconceptions
ruling your mind with regard to other people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
12 Jun 2005 02:58:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:14:45 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:284la1l63v81smgh17c887dl2qc9tbqleo@4ax.com...
On 11 Jun 2005 00:49:27 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
...in sales tax, on money that you didn't earn.
...eith money he hasn't earned.
What a lie.
If he had received something from
Duke, why the decade-long temper tantrum?
You actually care?
of course I care -- that's why I am questioning your integrity.
Otherwise, he retired, very
early.
I was terminated in 1993.
You want me to quote what the other Duke employee said, verbatim?
"You can't have it, you're fired."
Now, that is about the worst thing anyone has said to me in my entire life.
I have been told worse -- but I moved on.
So?
Precisely.
I sure hope you can be smarter than to rashly resort to misconceptions
ruling your mind with regard to other people.
Who is supporting you, if I am grossly amiss?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Someriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 11:27:56 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 03:33:20 PM |
|
|
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit do you disagree with?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
10 Jun 2005 06:08:51 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 12:54:09 AM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
....or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 02:21:22 AM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 AM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 07:27:52 AM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want the
best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
So he hasn't any money. Whose money, then, is paying for the purchase
of services and goods which are taxed? I wonder...
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 07:50:29 AM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want
the best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
So he hasn't any money. Whose money, then, is paying for the purchase
of services and goods which are taxed? I wonder...
Given what he's managed to get out through his foaming, probably his parents
or kin - who else in their right minds would put up with him?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 07:56:16 AM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 07:50:29 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want
the best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
So he hasn't any money. Whose money, then, is paying for the purchase
of services and goods which are taxed? I wonder...
Given what he's managed to get out through his foaming, probably his parents
or kin - who else in their right minds would put up with him?
So he's never earned a dime of it from work.
He's a fucking leech moaning about what other people have earned paid
through work.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 08:30:27 AM |
|
|
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:50:29 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want
the best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
So he hasn't any money. Whose money, then, is paying for the purchase
of services and goods which are taxed? I wonder...
Given what he's managed to get out through his foaming, probably his parents
or kin - who else in their right minds would put up with him?
So he's never earned a dime of it from work.
He earned a bit while working, but after they canned him (apparently, for
taking all that time looking after his brother, after his accident and
subsequent problems resulting from the hospital care he got) it looks like
what he had went to try and sell his shares of Duke Energy and they did
something to keep him from selling until it wasn't worth very much; what he
had left was swallowed by the court costs.
He's a fucking leech moaning about what other people have earned paid
through work.
His refusal to work after the aforementioned series of events is what's drawn
my disrespect.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: If it is a woman's body and a woman's choice |
11 Jun 2005 08:42:54 AM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 08:30:27 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:50:29 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 07:22:07 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 11 Jun 2005 00:54:09 -0500, The Chief Instigator <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Somewriter <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Someriter" <somewriter@writingsomething.com> wrote in message
news:srfja1hgfm91p9herj8ci5t3d9jhlfvkhg@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:11:25 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
news:ttmia19e990d44ubkp7rc4j1803ask0bf6@4ax.com...
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:02:54 -0400, "Johnny"
<wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Lovin' Spoonful" <invalid@invalid> wrote in message
news:42a7d17a$0$18640$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
"Kurt Greske" <kurt_greske@eee.org> wrote in message
news:uj4fa1lapv365sq1rj8qhvagdn2g3pjeul@4ax.com...
why the hell should men have to pay child support. Bitches want
the best of both worlds.
Why should us taxpayers support men's unwanted spawn?
Which means you are asking us why should taxpayers support unwanted
spawn...
Why should you worry? You haven't a tax liability!
I pay a tax almost every day here.
--with somebody else's tax contribution.
What part of earned benefit...
What is it that you've earned? Being a malinger doesn't honestly
entitle you to benefits, fraud.
...or even a malingerer. ;-) To be honest, if he worked for his former
employers, he will have some earned benefits coming to him at some future
time. (Assuming they don't manage to run themselves out of business a la
Enron, anyway.)
Social security? So he retired at 30?
Not quite - he was punted. In any case, his (and Duke's) SSI contributions
will be gathering interest until he's old enough (in his case, the start of
2024) to start getting his monthly check...assuming there's still a Social
Security to pay anything.
So he hasn't any money. Whose money, then, is paying for the purchase
of services and goods which are taxed? I wonder...
Given what he's managed to get out through his foaming, probably his parents
or kin - who else in their right minds would put up with him?
So he's never earned a dime of it from work.
He earned a bit while working, but after they canned him (apparently, for
taking all that time looking after his brother, after his accident
WAIT -- his accident?
and
subsequent problems resulting from the hospital care he got) it looks like
what he had went to try and sell his shares of Duke Energy and they did
something to keep him from selling until it wasn't worth very much; what he
had left was swallowed by the court costs.
Oh, lord.
He's a fucking leech moaning about what other people have earned paid
through work.
His refusal to work after the aforementioned series of events is what's drawn
my disrespect.
I'll comment on that when I hear more about this alleged accident. Do
tell.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
